[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1512785516730.png (630.62 KB, 617x614, Screen Shot 2017-12-08 at 8.08…)

No. 215253

A couple of days ago, 23-year-old August Ames committed suicide. She did so a day after she received criticism for tweeting that she would not have sex with a porn star who did gay porn out of concern for her health.

What do you guys think?

I don't agree with the huge amount of criticism she got. Apparently she had depression? It's too bad no one managed to address it sooner. But her loved ones really cared about her, why did they let her go into porn the first place?

No. 215256

>why did they let her go into porn the first place?
Uh… she's a grown woman, they can't force her not to do it.

Anyway, my take on it is this: I'm a strong believer that hate on the internet can get to such an obscene level and I really wish online witch hunts and gross shit like sending death threats/desire for the person to commit suicide would stop being a thing. Anytime someone commits suicide as the result of online harassment, my heart goes out to them.

That being said… she was being a hypocritical homophobic cunt. I'm sorry, but you can't be a fucking porn star then sperg out about how gays are such a risk to your health without me judging the ever living fuck put of you for being such a retard and a bigot. Sad she killed herself, though. I wish she just realized the extent of her idiocy, put out a sincere public apology, and got help for her issues.

No. 215268

>That being said… she was being a hypocritical homophobic cunt. I'm sorry, but you can't be a fucking porn star then sperg out about how gays are such a risk to your health without me judging the ever living fuck put of you for being such a retard and a bigot.
The porn industry is riddled with STDs as it is, and gays have higher HIV rates. She'd put herself at a significantly higher risk. Soz but it's true.

No. 215278

>>215253
>But her loved ones really cared about her, why did they let her go into porn the first place?
This is stupid, she was an adult capable of making her own choices, do you think they should have tied her up or something? Or that porn stars don't have family that care for them?

She should never have had the pile on she got, but I do think part of the reason for the bullying was the way she went about it. Had she phrased it all as personal choice and/or a call to arms for stricter STD testing, she likely wouldn't have received the amount of hatred that she did. After all, straight porn stars could likely easily have HIV too and it's a community with a lot of intermixing. It's hypocritical not to want to have sex with someone who did/does gay porn if she's willing to sleep with other porn stars who could be carrying something.

No. 215280

>>215256
>I'm sorry, but you can't be a fucking porn star then sperg out about how gays are such a risk to your health without me judging the ever living fuck put of you for being such a retard and a bigot.

Gay porn has less strict testing, it's very likely the dude's partners were not tested and it takes time for anything to show on a test. Of course this isn't common knowledge and she also didn't phrase herself well.

Unfortunate ending to an unfortunate story though.

No. 215281

>>215268
Except that it isn't just that she was making a personal decision for herself, it's that she was going on about how horrible it was for porn companies to pair women with men who've done gay porn because "omg the gays are gonna give us aids!" and publicly singled out someone in her industry for doing it.

I'm sorry, but it's incredibly homophobic to make a post like that in regards to an industry that, like you said, is already riddled with STDs. This woman has been in 200+ porn movies by 23, she's already put herself at risk literally hundreds of time, yet she has then nerve to single out gays when she has a much higher chance of having something than many people who've done gay porn. The fact the porn industry still casts people who've been in 200+ movies is a far greater health risk than someone whose done a little gay porn.

No. 215284

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if this chick had BPD. Everyone is talking about suicide, but I don't think this is normal suicidal behavior. BPD is way less sympathetic. But it's just my gut reaction and I'm talking about of my ass.

Everyone is talking about how young this chick is, like it somehow makes her automatically naive and too young to understand the consequences of her actions. I'm the same age, and I couldn't imagine responding this way.

>>215268
Well if you want a safe job I don't know if porn acting is for you.

Even if the math adds up I don't think she should have been so public about it on twitter. I get she was being an ~adovocate~ but of all the sketchy stuff the porn industry makes you do now you suddenly speak up?

>>215281
I agree.

No. 215286

says dumb shit and couldn't take the backlash? what did she fucking expect? I need more backstory to this. So she decided to just off herself after people didn't appreciate what she said? Instead of being "an adult" and clearing the air? Jesus Christ I'm sorry for her family's loss but I'm also sorry they had such an idiot in their family

No. 215287

>>215284
There had to be something pre-existing that was plaguing her for her to commit suicide over this, yeah. I can't imagine this specific situation being someones only reason for offing themselves.

No. 215288

File: 1512800071675.jpg (295.38 KB, 720x1017, 20171208_221336.jpg)


No. 215292

>>215286
No one just up and kills themselves after a day of some social media backlash. She obviously had some kind of mental illness. "I'm sorry they had such an idiot in their family" is a really callous thing to say.

No. 215293

>>215281
>This woman has been in 200+ porn movies by 23, she's already put herself at risk literally hundreds of time, yet she has then nerve to single out gays when she has a much higher chance of having something than many people who've done gay porn
She was tested regularly. Gay performers are not.

No. 215294

>>215268
>The porn industry is riddled with STDs as it is
Yeah no doubt, people are acting like everyone is clean and she had no reason to be paranoid about that stuff. I remember there was a case a while back where they managed to spread ringworm a while back due to their non existent sanitary standards. It's an open secret that their already weak standards are especially shit as far as gay porn goes.

People are whining about how homophobic she is but the fact is there IS an STD issue in the porn industry and it's even more pronounced with homosexuals.

>>215286
It's not like people were just saying "hey I disagree with what you're saying", major heads in the industry were telling her to kill herself and doubled down when she actually did so. There were undoubtedly other issues going on but reasonable discussion was no longer an option before she killed herself.

No. 215304

>>215294
Major heads? It was like two guys.

No. 215305

>says she doesn't approve of homosexual porn stars fucking heterosexual ones because of "bodily safety"
>she kills herself
Okay.
>she thinks she has the right to make blanket statements about gay porn stars
>she doesn't think other people have the right to make a blanket statement about her tone being homophobic and singled out
Okay.

She sounds like a brat. And committing suicide just because she received some backlash and people questioning her statement on Twitter is retaliatory and vengeful. No one in their right mind would think that's an appropriate reaction. She was 1000 kinds of dicks in the ass fucked.

Can't wait to see all her relatives crawl out of the woodwork to shake her cold body around for sympathy cash.
Protip: Being a whore for hire significantly increases your chances of catching an STD and developing a mental disorder.

No. 215307

>>215288
I agree with this 100%. Is anyone going to post caps of the "homophobic" shit she said?

No. 215308

File: 1512804176289.png (131.71 KB, 737x476, replace me, will you.png)

>>215307
Why put it in quotations? She's clearly bitter that she got ousted in lieu of someone else and had to make a jab at the gay man who was working with her replacement.

No. 215309

Of all things… Why would a regular porn star be co-starring with a gay male porn star?

No. 215310

>>215309
Because the porn industry doesn't give a shit about your sexual orientation. Only that you can look good and perform if it's demanded.

No. 215311

Confirmed bipolar disorder and multiple personality disorder.
>https://hornetapp.com/stories/august-ames-suicide/
"Ames having revealed her personal struggles with bipolar depression and multiple personality disorder three months before her death on a podcast: 'Some days I’ll be fine and if I’m not doing anything I’ll get these awful flashbacks of my childhood and I get very depressed and I can’t get out of bed and cancel my scenes for like a week or two,' she said."

No. 215312

>>215311
>Some days I’ll be fine and if I’m not doing anything I’ll get these awful flashbacks of my childhood and I get very depressed and I can’t get out of bed and cancel my scenes for like a week or two
That doesn't sound like bipolar disorder or multiple personality disorder.

No. 215313

>>215312
It's literally confirmed on multiple sources based on the podcast interview where she admitted them.
>http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/porn-star-august-ames-revealed-depression-struggles-death-article-1.3683371

No. 215314

Did you guys know her husband used to be married to another porn star who killed herself?

>>215311
First of all multiple personality disorder isn't a thing. Maybe the writer was thinking of dissociative identity disorder which probably isn't real either.

No. 215315

>>215314
>>215311
It's almost like people don't take their own lives unless there is something really wrong in their own lives and heads.

No. 215317

>>215314
>multiple personality disorder isn't a thing

Do you think you have a 'gotcha' moment here?
Dissociative identity disorder was formerly called multiple personality disorder.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissociative_identity_disorder
>"Dissociative identity disorder (DID), also known as multiple personality disorder (MPD)"
>https://www.psychologytoday.com/conditions/dissociative-identity-disorder-multiple-personality-disorder
>"Dissociative identity disorder, formerly referred to as multiple personality disorder"

No. 215319

>>215317
That's technically true but it's a good way to make it look like you have no idea what you're talking about.

>>215315
That's true and why I'm tired of people blaming bullies for her death. As well as the suicide of every attractive white girl out there.

No. 215321

>>215319
>but it's a good way to make it look like you have no idea what you're talking about
More like that's bullshit and you're nitpicking.

No. 215323

>>215321
How is it bullshit? I just think it's something annoying. Alright I'll admit "MPD" and DID are the same thing.

Either way DID is an incredibly rare disorder that doesn't exist outside of Anglophone countries, so I would be surprised if this chick actually had it.

No. 215324

>>215319
jesus your tumblr is showing pretty far away

We've entered an age where it's okay for people to attack someone for a single thoughtless tweet and drive them into killing themselves. Mental illness doesn't show to the outside and not everyone wants to make it their identity like so many SJWs do, so you never know when you're telling a bipolar-DID-patient to commit suicide.

No. 215325

>>215324
How is this about tumblr? You're really making assumptions. I actually received a lot of hate from SJWs when I was on tumblr. Like a sane person, I did my best to ignore the messages I got even though I have some mental issues too. And I found that laying low made most people forget about you after a while even if you said really controversial things. People don't have the attention span to keep up these days.

I never said it's ok to send death threats. But people aren't going to stop sending mean messages anytime soon, and everyone has to know that walking away usually solves the issue. I don't approve of online mob justice, but this is the reality we have to deal with.

I don't get it. Is it suddenly ok to tell someone to kill themselves if they don't have a mental illness? And what does DID have to do with suicide?

Some comment made on this imageboard could really set someone out on the edge. Does that mean we need to shut this place down? I don't think so.

I guess I'm a SJW because I think people should try to take control of their behavior. Yeah… that's like the opposite of what SJWs do.

Another thing is I've also suffered from suicidal thoughts. But it's not like there was anything objectively horrible about my life that's made it worse than most people's. Some things had gone wrong, but the main problem is that I have had trouble controlling my emotions. That's it - That's what makes me and a lot of other people different from non-suicidal people.

From what I've read people who follow through with committing suicide have higher impulsivity and fear pain less. That's why men have higher suicide rates than women. It's not because there's something objectively wrong about their lives.

So in the words of Tyler the Creator, "Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Walk Away From The Screen Like Nigga Close Your Eyes Haha"

No. 215326

>>215281
You're stupid af if you think all they do is "a little gay porn".

Way to try and minimize that. I'm lesbian and hang a lot with other gay people and let me tell you how promiscuous gay guys are, let's not be PC here. It's true, end of story. Gay guys have to navigate dating while being paranoid of HIV and for good reasons.
So it's safe to assume that if you do gay porn, you're likely to engage in gay sex outside of your porn job and be at more risk of catching something.

She's totally within her rights to protect HER health even if it means shutting out a part of the population due to very real risks. She's not pulling that out of thin air. She wasn't saying she doesn't want to fuck black people because it's icky or arabs because something else.

Sometimes you have to chose between offending a part of a population and shutting out someone due to health concerns and worrying about catching a still lethal disease, if you wanna be dumb and put yourself at risk go ahead but don't shit on other people who prefer to protect themselves.

No. 215327

>>215326
T h i s

No. 215329

>>215324
>be sensitive and delicate towards people who write aggressive tweets, never know who might have a mental disorder
>lol but who cares if she said to hell with those gay guys man, everyone knows they all have AIDs


She didn't care about her health. She killed herself.
She cared about her brief moment of smug superiority up until some people said she was shitty and that delusion came crashing down.

No. 215332

>>215309
A lot of men who do gay porn also do straight porn, it's a pretty common thing. The pool of male porn stars is kind of small anyway. I understand why she had concerns especially regarding the issue with testing in the gay porn community, but since there is overlap and other porn stars apparently had no issue with shooting with these men then she should have taken issue with the entire industry, not just the gay side of it. After all, it's pretty easy to pass along a disease between multiple people who have sex every day, or nearly so.

>>215314
>Did you guys know her husband used to be married to another porn star who killed herself?
Well he has a type I guess. Hope other girls know to avoid the black widow(er).

No. 215335

File: 1512821008475.jpg (56.5 KB, 980x544, HIV.jpg)

The same people who are saying "she's an adult, she can choose to do porn" are calling her a homophobe for choosing not to have sex with a gay man. Men who have sex with men have greater risk of HIV infection. It's not homophobic to recognise that.

None of us know what happened behind the scenes. There are so many problems with the porn industry, yet the sex-positive crowd would rather criticise the women in porn than the horrible agents who don't give a shit about the safety and mental health of sex workers.

No. 215336

File: 1512822429422.png (44.92 KB, 575x190, aspenbrooks.png)


No. 215338

>>215335
You can't talk about anal sex being riskier in terms of STD contamination without getting stoned and called a homphobe these days.
I had that discussion about gays being restricted from giving blood in my country and tried to explain that the reason behind it wasn't discrimination (and also that giving blood isn't even a fucking right) but public safety and oh boy, it was a fucking shitstorm.

No. 215339

>>215335
>calling her a homophobe for choosing not to have sex with a gay man
No one is criticizing her for her personal decision. Did we read the same tweet anon? She wasn't just like "I wouldn't feel safe doing a shoot with someone who's been on gay porn because it's not regulated enough and increases my chance of infection", if that was all she said, that would be fine. She was putting the industry on blast for pairing them with people who've done gay porn as if they were the only risk to her health.

Also, all of you defending her Tweet keep saying "she gets tested regularly and there's more testing in straight porn", but HIV and herpes don't show up in a test for months. She might be at less of a chance of getting it than a gay porn star who has been in just as many films, but she still has put herself at risk for infection 200+ times. There's no way to truly protect yourself in the porn industry other than always using a condom and taking PREP every time.

So yeah, if she was that concerned with her health, she shouldn't have been doing porn in the first place.

>>215338
Yeah, because a guy who has anal sex once can't give blood, but someone who has fucked hundreds of people can. You can't single out gays but allow hyper promiscuous straight people to do it as if they're magically immune. Spoiler alert: straight people get it too.

It's like you guys think gays and those who fuck them are the only segment of the population susceptible to it just because the rate is higher. Also, heterosexual people who engage in anal sex are still allowed to give it. But keep telling me about how homophobia plays no role in the fact that gays are singled out.

>>215329
This

No. 215340

File: 1512826404359.jpg (68.84 KB, 598x792, C24jXVUXcAEP0LH.jpg)

It's funny how much of liberalism is basically this willed, conscious denial of reality (gays aren't insanely promiscuous and orders of magnitude more likely to have diseases, all races commit violent crime at exactly the same rates, all cultures have exactly the same level of respect towards women etc.)

You can't argue with these people either because they simply do not recognize the concept of general trends as being real things. To them, the existence of exceptions in of themselves means that trends don't exist. This way of thinking has its roots in a Medieval philosophy called "nominalism".

Of course, on some visceral level these people do recognize this. E.g. ask them to live in a black ghetto for a few months and they'll balk.

>"To deny the existence of objective reality and yet, all the while, to take account of the reality which one denies."


>- George Orwell

No. 215341

>>215294
>It's not like people were just saying "hey I disagree with what you're saying", major heads in the industry were telling her to kill herself and doubled down when she actually did so.

It gives you an insight into how warped the morality of the left is. These are people who honestly believe someone who makes off-color remarks about homosexuals or other races on twitter deserve physical violence or even death, but will throw their lot in with "activists" working for death-penalty reprieves for violent rapists and murderers.

The whole morality in the west is sick and twisted in so many different ways that I just think the entire system needs to come crashing down at this point. There's no way it can be salvaged.

No. 215342

>>215329
Takei, Spacey and the rest of your heroes are all predators. And the more that comes out of Hollywood the more will be revealed about predatory homosexual behavior. Gay men are promiscuous and disgusting, keep your fag-hag love-in to yourself. Gay men are among the biggest misogynists I've ever encountered.

No. 215343

File: 1512828427392.png (297.71 KB, 600x512, 084.png)

>>215342
>Takei, Spacey and the rest of your heroes

No. 215344

>>215343
>same picture
>same filename

No. 215345

>>215339
>But keep telling me about how homophobia plays no role in the fact that gays are singled out.

Gay men are singled out because they are disproportionately affected by this. We'll never solve the problem when we can't even accept that there is one in the first place. Why does the choice have to be between denying reality in order to not seem homophobic and shit like this: "Gay men are promiscuous and disgusting"?

August Ames drew the line at having sex with gay men. Everyone should respect her decision to say no. It's her choice. But apparently it's homophobic now to not have sex with gay men. How did it come to this?

No. 215346

>>215339
Yes, straight people can get it too but it's a FUCKING FACT backed up by STUDIES that gay males are statically more prone to get HIV. I don't care about what gays do in their bedrooms, but I do care about risks of contamination. Anal sex IS riskier. Lack of lubrification makes condoms less efficient and anal sex results in more tearings.
You're like those men who like to cover their eyes about the fact that any vaginal coitus can result in a pregnancy regardless of contraception because they don't like thinking about the risk.
That's just plain stupid.

No. 215348

>>215345
No one is denying reality except for the people who don't see it as homophobic to allow incredibly promiscuous straight people or those who have engaged in anal sex give blood, but not guys who've fucked even just one dude in their life.

No. 215349

>>215345
Holy shit, people have already said several times they have no problem that she personally didn't want to, but that's NOT what she said in her Tweet. She shat on the industry for ever putting women in a movie with anyone who's done gay porn.

Tell me, would you support a man who insisted that men should never have sex with promiscuous women because their chance of getting an STD from them is higher?

No. 215350

Okay, but if homophobia plays no role in this and the straight porn industry is so much safer, then wouldn't they be testing him anyway?

No. 215351

>>215349
Well, men can choose not to sleep with someone too. Seems fair.
That's a shit argument.

No. 215352

>>215348
Gay men can give blood now so I don't see what that has to do with anything I said.

>>215349
>Tell me, would you support a man who insisted that men should never have sex with promiscuous women because their chance of getting an STD from them is higher?

It's actually more likely that women get STDs from men but whatever. If men only want to date virgins I'm not going to tell them they're discriminating against promiscuous women. They probably won't get laid a lot but that's their choice.

No. 215353

>>215351
It's not the personal choice aspect, as stated many times now.

No. 215354

>>215352
Because what you quoted was me referencing them being singled out when it comes to giving blood, so I thought that was what you were referring to.

No. 215355

>>215341
Can you please not derail the thread with your bitching about the left? It's not relevant to the discussion

No. 215356

it's her job, her decision who to have sex woth, her health. HIV is untreatable and i am sure she knows way more about the industry than spergs on the internet. nobody also knows what was happening in her life at the moment and it's very sad she killed herself.

No. 215359

>>215354
I was responding more in the context of August's decision to single out gay men. I can't really discuss the blood donation issue because I have no experience with it. I would have thought there's a questionnaire or something and they exclude all sorts of people based on their responses. Donating blood isn't a right. I don't meet the weight requirement for example.

>>215353
So are lesbians who don't want to date transwomen transphobic then? Even if it were transphobic I don't think it even matters. Everyone has the right to refuse sex with anyone for whatever reason and no matter how offended you are by it you don't get criticise that choice.

>>215356
Exactly. She mentions the studio and the agent in her tweet who are notoriously unethical. Maybe she was pressured or made uncomfortable.

No. 215360

As tragic as her suicide is for everyone that knew her, I'm keking so hard at all those altright neckbeards twisting this story into "Pornstar bullied to death by liberals for speaking the TRUTH". Like as if they would care if she hadn't been in porn and this wouldn't have been about gays.

No. 215361

gay men
>sleep with anything that has a cock, put their dicks into glory holes, go to public bathrooms for sole purpose of fucking strangers
also gay men
>why can't i donate blood? why are we considered a high risk group?? oppreshun!!!

poor girl did the right thing, it probably took her 200+ porn movies to get anywhere near the level of risk that fucking a gay actor would put her in. shouldn't have said anything though, tumblrites are fucking vicious

No. 215362

>>215338
Eh yeah, no that rule is fucking bullshit. Blood should be tested before given to ANYONE. Banning gay people from donating blood doesn't prevent others from catching HIV, straight people get it too. It also cuts out a huge proportion of people from helping to save lives.

No. 215363

>>215360
It's not just altright neckbeards saying that. Most of those guys would side with a gay man before they'd side with a woman.

No. 215365

>>215362
Oh yeah, because that wouldn't generate massive cost on already spread thin ressources, right?
By the way it's done, everything is tested, but they mix tanks of blood before they test it. There is no risk in it, but if one sample is contamined, you throw away the whole tank and it's a massive waste. That's why they ask questions to try to weed out people who are statically more are risk (like gays and people doing drugs).
Stop talking out of your fucking ass.

No. 215366

>>215339
Why are you so upset that she didn’t want to have sex with a guy? Even porn stars have the right to refuse sex whenever they want. Maybe she didn’t phrase things correctly, but she was being honest, and I don’t understand why people are so upset at her bringing up the issues of STD rates in porn. SOMEONE had to bring it up eventually, why not her?

No. 215371

>won't have sex with a regularly tested gay person for health reason
>will gladly cut off oxygen to her brain and die of slow asphyxiation
Hah.

No. 215378

All women have the right to refuse sex for whatever reason they choose. End of.

No. 215380

>>215366
Of course people don't need to have sex with anyone for any reason. But I think there's a difference between having a preference and putting "Sorry, no blacks, but I'm not racist" on your profile.

And I'm pretty sure the problem of STD rates in porn doesn't have much to do with women being forced to have sex with gay actors. Just saying. Collectively, all the times she had sex with regular actors wasn't talking about? lol

>>215371
lol breathplay is dumb

>>215356
The prognosis for HIV isn't that bad these days. And a lot of other STDs are becoming untreatable. Why you would become a porn actor if you care so much about your health lmao

>>215349
I still don't get it. The industry does a lot of other things to women. And is it like gay porn actors are sloots who deserve to get AIDS in their line of work but women actors deserve something else?

I'm curious about the statistics here. Let's say that the probability of catching HIV from a straight actor is 5% and then catching it from a gay actor is 4 times that.

So if you have sex with five straight actors the chances of catching aids.

P(not A) = 1 – P(A) = 1 - (0.95)^5 = 22.6%.

In this arbitrary example I came up with on the top of my head, it's about the same. It really depends on what the numbers actually are.

No. 215381

Now she never has to worry about getting AIDS ever again :^)

No. 215382

>>215366
>>215359
How many times do people need to tell you guys it has nothing to do with the fact she doesn't want to have sex with gay men? No one gives a fuck who she chooses to have sex with. It has already been explained multiple times that it's about her demonizing the porn industry for daring to pair the pure female pornstars with the ones who have done gay shit. You keep repeatedly ignoring this for some reason.

>>215361
Right, because all gay men are sluts and absolutely none of them aren't, so let's just discriminate against every single one of them while we let a girl that's taken hundred of cocks im every hole donate because at least she's not a gay dude amirite?

No. 215384

>>215378
Literally no one is contesting this, strawman.

No. 215385

>>215380
>Why you would become a porn actor if you care so much about your health lmao
This. I don't give a fuck that she doesn't want to sleep with guys who've done gay porn, but the irony in her logic is amazing. This is a girl who's done almost 300 porn films at 23. But it's the gays she's worried about. Kay then.

No. 215386

File: 1512846835853.png (94.21 KB, 522x484, Screen Shot 2017-12-09 at 1.08…)

Ok after reading her tweets, it's just so dumb. What a non-apology.

Why don't we have people understand you don't HAVE to tweet every thought that comes out of your mind? If you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Especially if you are a public figure. I thought that this chick was one of the random people whose tweets they thought were private got public attention. But given how popular she was, she had to have known that her online postings could get backlash.

>>215382
>No one gives a fuck who she chooses to have sex with. It has already been explained multiple times that it's about her demonizing the porn industry for daring to pair the pure female pornstars with the ones who have done gay shit.
But gays, are like, so gross!!! Omg

No. 215387

>>215326

All of my this.

No. 215388

>>215382
Just as you keep ignoring the fact that gay men are at higher risk for carrying the virus. I don't get all the virtue signaling happening here lately. Stop caring all over the place.

No. 215389

>>215384

Maybe you need to not worry so much about 'the demonization of the porn industry' and gay men who actually don't give two fucks about you being their ally.

No. 215391

>>215386
Seriously though, why do women like her word things in such a catty and bitchy way and then backpedal later with bullshit like "sorry it's my opinion and my body didn't mean to offend"? Bitch please, nobody is saying you should be forced to fuck a gay man, it's how you fucking said it.
It's how she acts like being a porn star is a healthy body decision in the first place.
It's how she acts like recruiters don't screen for STDs and that straight/lesbian stars don't have them.
It's how she comes off as jealous and scornful towards gay/bi porn stars because they actually get a lot of work for being able to switch.

She makes a big deal out of all this shit on the basis of "health" and then kills herself because she neglected her mental health enough that petty Twitter comments got to her. It's all bullshit.

No. 215392

>>215382
>it's about her demonizing the porn industry

my sides

No. 215393

>>215391
Why do you sound like an incel?

No. 215394

>>215386
It's like the people going "hdu be offended by her choice of who to sleep with!" are reading different Tweets.

No. 215395

>>215393
How is anything I said "incel"?

No. 215396

>>215326
No one would have cared if she didn't tweet about it.

>>215385
I think the sad thing is maybe getting to act picky was a way of reassuring herself she wasn't in "real" danger. And people have weird leaps in logic all the time.

>>215393
Because someone said something critical of a pure innocent woman. B/c women do nothing wrong. lol

>>215391
I think sounding jealous is a stretch but I agree with your points. She looks like one of the girls who are obsessed with being "blunt". I think "it's my opinion" is a legitimate thing to say but it doesn't sound good in the context she wrote it. Very unprofessional.

>>215394
No I think they're the kind of people who think writing "No fats/femmes" is perfectly fine because IT'S MY BODY!!!!

No. 215397

>>215388
Literally no one is denying this, but you people act like it's the majority of gay men who have it when they don't. They're still very much a minority among them.

>>215395
Because pointing out the obvious is not welcome in this thread

No. 215398

>>215395
>women like her
>catty, bitchy
>backpedaling
>how she said it, so wrong, rage

No. 215400

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/19/porn-hiv-penis-bleeding_n_3944401.html
>Porn Performer With HIV Says Costar Was Bleeding During Shoot

This should show you how safe the straight porn industry is

Was it ok she didn't want to have sex with a gay porn actor over safety concerns? I do think so
Did she have to tweet about it? Nope
Was she too young to understand her situation? No
Was she someone who was concerned about her health? No
Is she a tragic figure? Not more than your average porn star

No. 215402

>>215398
>women like her
Exactly, women like her because most women aren't hypocritical sex workers too high on their horse.
>catty bitchy
Which is what she was being.
>backpedaling
A very common word used on this website quite often. God, you're reaching here.
>how she said it
And? You're telling me no cows or flakes posted on this website are ever policed for their tone and the way they word things?
You just want to believe I'm a man because what I'm saying makes you uncomfortable. Better to put my argument in the "incel" box so you can ignore it.
As if every feminist has to embrace the tenet of some loudmouth sex worker who said some dense shit and got a proper backlash for it.
Do you even realize had she said something like "I choose not to work with gay porn stars," I, nor anyone else, would've had a problem with it?

No. 215403

>>215360
I get the feeling the same people going on about how evil and diseased gay men wouldn't have given a fuck if she had been bullied to suicide for any other reason. Online bullying only counts if it supports their talking points.

>>215391
This is all true though, had she gone about this a different way she would have gotten a very different response, ignoring her hypocrisy (or at best, how short sided she was).

No. 215404

Apparently the guy who she was supposed to film with hadn't done gay porn in about 10 years. Way to accuse some guy of maybe having HIV.

>>215398
How is backpedaling an incel word now?

No. 215406

File: 1512848828709.jpeg (85.96 KB, 750x550, 88304FF5-D0A9-49AF-954D-1F8197…)

I was originally going to post this in the tranny thread, then I noticed that this already had its own thread so here I go.

I’m 500% behind real transwomen with actual gender dysphoria who treat cis women with respect and show gratitude for the support they get, yet people like pic related are the reason I also understand TERFs and why they’re so wary of people who call themselves transwiminz. As we can see with this degenerate fuck, some ugly, disgusting and pathetic men who have failed too hard at being men call themselves trans just so they can get away with spreading their putrid hatred of women. Imagine pissing on the grave of a girl who was just bullied into killing herself over refusing sex and having the GALL to claim you’re doing good. This right here is proof that SJW shitstains don’t give a fuck about rape victims and “my body, my choice” unless it suits their narrative. They’ll readily shit on their graves as long as they can get away with it and justify it with “muh advocacy”

I’m so fucking mad I could cry rn

No. 215407

>>215403
>I get the feeling the same people going on about how evil and diseased gay men wouldn't have given a fuck if she had been bullied to suicide for any other reason. Online bullying only counts if it supports their talking points.

You're on a site for conjecture and gossip.

No. 215408

>>215393
You know what sounds incel?

Assuming all female sex workers have STDs without proof.
Yet it's okay for you to defend someone who was literally accusing a specific gay sex worker of having HIV.

No. 215409

>>215408
Heh never thought of it that way before but you have a point.
>male incel refuses to fuck porn actresses and prostitutes because they have higher incidences of STDs
>they're misogynists for stereotyping
>female porn actress assumes gay porn actor must have HIV on the basis that gay porn actors transmit on a greater scale
>HER BODY HER CHOICE

I think in either situation you can agree that if both parties were civil about their preferences or didn't post about them, nobody would care.

No. 215410

>>215406
Can't we keep this at one of the bajillion trans threads that already exist? Thx

>>215402
Agreed. Some people are reaching so hard every opinion that doesn't jive with their views must be the work of a dirty incel.

No. 215411

>>215408
You're so right. It is okay for me to do that. Just like it's okay for you to keep virtue signaling to no one on an anon image board. Isn't the world a great place?

No. 215413

Seems like women can't choose who to get laid anymore. Nothing changed, in the end.

No. 215414

>>215402
Restrain your autism, please.

No. 215416

File: 1512849627581.jpg (4.71 KB, 190x153, 1510546572372.jpg)

>>215414
>>215411
>"Not an incel? THEN SHUT YOUR MOUTH YOU VIRTUE SIGNALING AUTIST!!!"

No. 215417

>>215413

Same old, same old. It's laughable. When they start hanging out with gay men who are more misogynist than any straight guy they ever met, maybe the lightbulb will go off.

But I doubt it.

No. 215418

>>215416
Keep going, please. You don't sound like an unhinged loser at all.

No. 215419

>>215417
You know disagreeing with the tone of an arrogant whore who killed herself doesn't mean we wanna be friends with faggots.

No. 215420

>>215418
>"I have no argument left, better call other people names even though I look even more unhinged for not leaving."

No. 215421

>>215417
Not having sex with a man is literally violence, according to men, meanwhile triggering someone to suicide is okay, because the person is a homophobe porn actress.

No. 215422

>>215413
So you really think twitter would have cared if she had just quietly told producers and people behind the scenes that she didn't want to work with a specific person and let that be that? She made it public and chose to write the way she did. She didn't deserve to be bullied or the shit she got but she also should have anticipated that the way she went about things would be controversial and would get people riled up. And nobody seemed to want to force her to sleep with anyone, they were just butthurt at her alleged homophobia (up for debate) and the dumb way she went about things, because if she were really worried about STDs then she should have reconsidered her career choice.

No. 215423

>>215392

Demonization of the porn industry is relatively low on my list of things to sperg about.

No. 215424

>>215400
>>215404
THANK YOU. This is why everyone rationalizing it with "b-but the gays have a higher infection rate than heterosexuals!" is being fucking dumb. Higher infection rate among one group of people than another doesn't mean they're automatically a risk to you and the lower one isn't like she was acting.

"I do my homework for my body" lol clearly she didn't.

I'm sad she killed herself and her life was so tragic and riddled with bad decisions that probably stemmed from mental illness, but I'm not gonna pretend she wasn't an idiot just because she died.

>>215408
This

>>215417
I know a lot of gay men and none of them are misogynistic. Misandrist if anything. Not saying none exist, I'm sure they do, but stop acting like that's a blanket trait they have.

No. 215425

>>215420
Who else is still here and still posting greentext two minutes after my posts? I'm taking a shit, hon. You need to stop frothing.

No. 215426

>>215419
>whore
>faggots

If you are not an incel you sure sound like one. Back to /pol/.

>>215422
Do you realize that if she starts to disagree to do certain things she might be entirely boycotted from this industry, an industry that induces women to endure all sorts of things otherwise they won't get people to buy their dvds. There is no consent in pornography, if you are paid to have sex with someone, it's not consent, it's coercion.

No. 215427

File: 1512850092817.jpg (39.87 KB, 576x472, 1511021285453.jpg)

>>215425
Are you still here and accusing other people of being upset incels? LMAO

No. 215428

So the incel's opinion is that we shouldn't ever talk about things we disagree. We can disagree, but quietly. Otherwise we are petty and arrogant bitches.

No. 215429

>>215424

No, you don't know many gay men. You certainly don't know how they talk about women when they're alone. But keep kissing man ass. You are laughable.

No. 215430

>>215429
The gay men this person knows are probably her fresh-out-of-the-closet shy nerds she hangs out with in her community college.

No. 215431

>>215428
Nobody is trying to silence you, people are just saying to have more tact and to actually "do your homework" when you fucking claim to holy shit.

No. 215432

>>215426
You think the industry would give a shit about her posting stupid opinions on twitter? Her fans wouldn't care and they'd keep buying her stuff, so the industry as a whole wouldn't care. And there is consent in pornography, those companies don't want that kind of scandal on their hands (as in, the kind of scandal with legal repercussions). A porn star can put her foot down and refuse to sleep with someone, she just wouldn't go about it this publicly if she were smart.

No. 215433

>>215426
>There is no consent in pornography, if you are paid to have sex with someone, it's not consent, it's coercion.

While I'll agree that porn actresses are often forced to do things against their will AMD the rape culture is strong in that industry, you can knock it off with the prostitution=rape bullshit. Look up the meaning of coercion because clearly you don't know it. If a woman wants to have sex for money, there's nothing wrong with that unless she's being forced against her will.

No. 215434

>>215430
Exactly. The people posting in this thread are pretty funny, though. From caring about porn being demonized to thinking gay dudes are their BFF's, they have a lot to learn.

No. 215435

>>215431
There is no "tact" way to say you don't want to have sex with a gay actor because gays have more STDs due not being tested. SJWs will get mad either way because muh gays can't ever have flaws and people gotta have sex with them no matter what. The same happens when a lesbian says she won't get laid with a trans woman. People get mad. There is no soft way of saying this. If you imply it, you are attacked.

No. 215436

>>215382
>it's about her demonizing the porn industry
The porn industry is fucking disgusting and deserves whatever flak it gets.

No. 215437

>>215432
>And there is consent in pornography, those companies don't want that kind of scandal on their hands (as in, the kind of scandal with legal repercussions).
NTA, but this isn't entirely true. I encourage you to look into some of the horrifying accounts from some porn actresses on this issue. Also, there's A LOT of porn that's filmed with literal human trafficking victims.

No. 215438

File: 1512850484371.gif (370.19 KB, 500x333, 6hu.gif)

>>215429
Lol, this. Even in high school, the gay dudes were obnoxious as fuck towards girls but girls would just sit and take it because lel muh sassy shopping buddy.

When you end up on the receiving end of their shit for absolutely no reason other than you're competition in the race for cock then shit stops being fun. Gay men don't give a fuck about us except when they need something.

No. 215440

>>215432
The industry DOES give a shit when it's called out for bullshit, they paid actresses to say good things about it after some doc about how it harms women in the industry, but of course you are an uneducated piece of shit and probably never researched or cared about it and only cares about your precious porn being demonized because you are either a virgin masturbating daily incel or a stupid clueless libfem that thinks porn is empowering.

No. 215441

>>215392
>>215436
I worded this really poorly, but to clarify: I'm totally down with demonizing the porn industry, but I think this is a dumb fucking thing to do it over unless you're going to address the lack of concern for safety in general. She acts like this is the only issue within it that can negatively effect her.

No. 215442

>>215435
>There is no "tact" way to say you don't want to have sex with a gay actor

"I prefer to not have sex with gay actors."

But at least you agree it's hard to make a tactful approach, and therefore she should've expected backlash for posting a public tweet of her opinion.

>muh gays can't ever have flaws

Well they can, but that's not at issue here. It's different to say gay men have flaws than make a public tweet accusing one of them specifically of having HIV when she doesn't even know for sure based on a study.

No. 215443

>>215442
>she doesn't even know for sure based on a study.

People did post studies in this very thread, once again showing you are an ignorant retard…

No. 215444

>>215436

this thread is a gold mine.

i saw that and literally did a double take to my laptop. wtf lol is that anon talking about, yes, let us defend the poor, downtrodden porn industry that's given us such gems as anal gapes

No. 215446

File: 1512850697469.jpg (76.69 KB, 1280x720, 1487699988472.jpg)

>>215444
>let us defend the poor, downtrodden porn industry that's given us such gems as anal gapes

No. 215447

>>215443
Do you have troubles with reading?
I'm saying just because there's a study doesn't mean the INDIVIDUAL she called out had HIV.
You're the retard, tardlette.

No. 215448

>>215447
So if studies show something also she has knowledge that gay porn actors are not tested she is being homophobe because that individual might not have STDs even if studies and practice show otherwise? K then

No. 215449

>>215440
I like how you can't even decide on a strawman. And do you think the people giving her shit were all working for porn companies? She chose to make her statements public and the public responded.

No. 215450

>>215440
You are so stupid, please stop. I know you're unaware of this, but you're an embarrassment and every time you type you look worse and worse.

No. 215451

>>215442
Yeah, I can't understand for the life of me how it's not homophobic to single a specific actor out for possibly having HIV because he's done gay porn in the past when she knows absolutely nothing else about his history.

No. 215453

>>215447
Honey, honey. Stop. Please. I'm so sorry for you.

No. 215454

>>215435
>People get mad at others when they don't agree with them.

Yeah, take a look at all the spergs screeching about how SJWs and gays attacked this girl into suicide, but also have no problem attacking the anons disagreeing with them itt by calling them incels and idiots. Mhmm. I see that fully.

No. 215456

>>215453
Lol, knock it off and stop trying to make yourself feel better.

No. 215457

>>215410
Apologies. Is it okay to crosspost? Didn’t see the reply until 30 minutes had already passed so can’t delete it anymore.

Either way my point still stands. Too many people will take any chance they can get to abuse women when they exert their right to say no despite preaching “NO MEANS NO!!!!1111!1” when it gets them asspats.

Regardless of how it was handled she was openly bisexual so I think anyone with enough brain cells to type on a keyboard would be able to figure that she probably wasn’t a homophobe.

No. 215458

>>215450
Do you have a counter argument or you will just call me stupid? Do you want a bucket so you can cry inside?

>>215449
There are more than one people in this thread disagreeing with you, you paranoid drug ridden homo dick sucking stupid bitch. Also how was that strawman if we are talking about how the industry cares about scandals? lol

No. 215459

>>215451
Ignoring the issue of homophobia, it's stupid that she'd get all upset about working with one actor who had/has done gay porn when he was working in mainstream porn too, and he probably wasn't the only one. In that case, any of the straight performers she worked with (and never had issue with) were all also exposed to whatever potential diseases this man in question might have had. Her putting it all on him/gays was stupid and misguided.

No. 215460

>>215449
How dare she make a statement! How dare she! What a rude nasty bitch to not want pozzed loads in her ass.

You are actually an idiot. Go home.

No. 215461

>>215448
Except this actor hadn't done it in a decade and has been tested since. Plus, most gay porn stars don't have HIV. If she didn't feel comfortable having sex with him then fine, but she singled him out in a fucking tweet with no evidence he had poor health.

No. 215462

>>215461
How do you know most gay porns don't have HIV if according to her, someone in this very industry, said they don't get tested often? Also, did you know there are more STDs than just HIV? Really blows your mind, doesn't it.

No. 215463

>>215459
Fucking this. It's not even the homophobia that's worth criticizing as much as the sheer lack of logic.

No. 215464

>>215459
Tell me about how you think the porn industry works. Please. This should be good for some laughs.

No. 215466

>>215462
>gay porns

Lol brain fart, I meant gay porn actors, hopefully this won't be used as a "counter argument" by the very intelligent and culture people in this thread.

No. 215467

>>215462
The hits just keep coming! Muh contradictions!

No. 215468

>>215464
Not that anon but seriously are you a camslut or something? You're awfully invested in this and act like you know better than others when you're not even posting much. Usually camwhores are pretty fucking dumb defensive like this, which is why I ask.

No. 215469

>>215462
They do get tested, anon. Just not as often. And it also depends on the company, some make you test every single shoot.

Plus, as someone mentioned before, HIV and some other STDs don't show up for months, so she was already putting herself at risk of getting it as her fucking career. But, omg how dare the agents even consider tainting her sparkly clean cunt with the evil gay death stick.

No. 215470

>>215468
Plot twist: it's DumDolly. lol

No. 215471

>>215468
Samefagging anon is just going type out insults and claim superiority while not backing anything up with actual evidence or logic, just hysteria.

No. 215472

>>215469
Sooo let's see if I understand. A porn actress can't choose to not have sex with a gay guy because they DO get tested, but not as often, thus putting her in higher risk. But she can't deny having sex with gay men because her cunt is ridden with disease either way already, since she's a porn actress. So she doesn't get to choose either way. Alright.

No. 215473

>>215468

look out, they called for backup

No. 215474

>>215472

i think you got it in one

No. 215475

>>215472

and you're not allowed to say it on twitter

No. 215476

>>215475
Of course, because saying anything bad ever about any kind of men will get you backlash. Meanwhile gay men insist in not having sex with trans men and get 0 backlash from it, literally none cares.

No. 215477

>>215469
>sparkling clean cunt
No internalized misogyny there.

No. 215478

>>215472
Why are you guys clinging so hard to the "it's her choice!" shit. No one is fucking disagreeing with that. It's the fact she was so offended that the agents would even try to put women in porn with men who've done gay porn at all and singled out a specific actor in the process. Why can't you guys grasp that's why people are upset? It has nothing to do with her personal choice not to do it. That's been stated itt so many times now.

No. 215480

>>215476

yep pretty sad in here today tbh

No. 215481

>>215478
Because it's clearly NOT her choice if she got this amount of backlash exposing this.

No. 215482

>>215481

lol exactly but watch the goalposts move again

No. 215483

>>215478
Why are you clinging so hard to 'what a mean, nasty cunt for hurting the poor gay man's feels'?

No. 215484

>>215482
>>215481


Yeah, how dare she decide she doesn't want to fuck someone.

No. 215485


No. 215486

>>215484
Look, I agree, but the tastemakers of this thread have already told us what we should think, and that's to call the girl a stupid whore for being mean to men.

I don't know, all I can say is get in line or go home.

No. 215487

>>215323
>DID is an incredibly rare disorder that doesn't exist outside of Anglophone countries

what

No. 215488

>>215481
>mean people on the internet force me into choices
?????

No. 215489

>>215487

DID is extremely rare, period. It's nothing to do with the west, it's remarkably uncommon everywhere.

No. 215490

>>215488
Try again. I know it's really important for you to tell everyone here what a giant, stupid cunt you think this girl was, but you could go outside too.

No. 215491

>>215490
I'm not even the same anon, you need to calm down and quit acting like a cunt.

No. 215494

>>215488
30 minutes and this is all you could come up with?

No. 215495

>>215488
>mean girl on the twatters says stuff bout gays!!1!1!!1

No. 215497

>>215494
They held off for a whole half hour, hoping they could turn it around. How long will it take them to try again?

No. 215498

>>215494
>>215497
>implying you've argued with the same people this whole time
>implying people want to continue to argue with you when you're aggressive, hostile, and insist on calling people secret men

No thanks. I guess you "win."

No. 215499

>>215491

awww don't get upset!

it's not like you're getting blasted on social media by a pack of nasty gay dudes and their idiot allies desperate to dogpile and virtue signal, it's just friendly chat!

let's make certain it's not about demonization of the porn industry
that would be tragic

???

No. 215502

>>215499
You sound upset. Please don't kill yourself because people didn't agree with you.

No. 215504

>>215502

that's so sweet tysvm for your concern ~uwu~

bye now

No. 215575

Where did the idea that women are obligated to be "allies" of gay men even come from?

Gay men are far more likely to be misogynists than straight guys in my experience. Their sexual behavior is also far more disgusting on average.

No. 215577

>>215575
Same reason why women are expected to be allies of trannies. We're no longer safe even in the social justice movements that used to fight against sexism. Nobody gives a shit if a male is a flaming bigot, but women are expected to say "yes, sir" to whatever cocksleeve fag that comes along claiming to be oppressed.

No. 215586

>>215577
Posting this without realizing the irony that women like OP will be someone's cockslave about 300 times over as long as a man puts some currency in their thongs.
But sure, fags are the real problem.

No. 215587

>>215586
>spot the faggot
I don't see your point, are you implying that women are the problem? That faggots are better because they'll become cocksleeves for free? Enlighten me, anon.

No. 215589

>>215575
Maybe because the same mentality used to oppress women is used to oppress gay men? Seems pretty obvious unless you're horrifically uneducated.

Also, your anecdotal experience doesn't mean gay men are more prone to misogyny. If we're going by anecdotal shit, I've literally never met a misogynistic gay man in my entire life other than closet cases, and I've known many gays. They're usually massive allies to women. I'm not saying they're incapable of it, but the "gay men hate women!" shit I've seen in this thread as a blanket statement is fucking dumb. How about don't be a bigot? It's not that hard.

And the only reason they're more promiscuous than straight men is because straight men are going for women, who are much less about the "hey, you're hot, let's fuck!" life than men are. Obviously if you have men attracted to men, they're gonna be fucking a lot. Men are incredibly slutty, it's just that women aren't nearly as much so, so men going for women are gonna have a harder time getting laid.

>>215586
This

>>215587
NTA but their point is obviously that you're shitting on gays for having disgusting sex lives while defending a woman that's been in 300 porn films. If you don't see the hypocrisy in that, you're a fucking moron.

No. 215592

>>215587
Why the fuck are so many posters accusing other anons of being men itt? Holy shit, this belongs in the conspiracy thread.

No. 215593

>>215587
>are you implying that women are the problem?
No you stupid shitbrain.
It's anons like you who bicker and gatekeep about PORN when it's all sexist and misogynistic horseshit no matter which mentally ill bitch or fag is taking it up the arse. Then you rationalize it away when you come upon that realization by saying that it's "empowering" just because the workers get paid for doing degrading shit that ultimately cheapens human beings.

But no, of course, what's making spaces unsafe for you? Fags. What's causing sexism? Fags. Sure.
Not the straight men who consume the porn, demand the porn, and direct the porn. Pornography as a whole isn't the problem, it's fags.
You're fucking stupid and aren't worth the shit off a fag's ass.

No. 215594

File: 1512932493424.jpg (31.38 KB, 552x369, 1503119363692.jpg)

>>215575
>Gay men are far more likely to be misogynists than straight guys

No. 215595

>>215593
Preach it, anon

I'm so amazed by how fucking clueless and irrational some of the "feminist" anons ITT are

No. 215597

ITT:
>IT'S HER CHOICE AND IT'S NOT HOMOPHOBIC
>-explanations that's not the problem-
>IT'S HER CHOICE AND IT'S NOT HOMOPHOBIC
>-more explanations that's not the problem-
>IT'S HER CHOICE AND IT'S NOT HOMOPHOBIC
>-even more explanations that's not the problem
>GAY MEN ARE TERRIBLE DEGENERATES AND HOW IS IT WRONG TO HATE THEM???

Well, you guys certainly revealed your real reason for defending this girl so adamantly…

No. 215601

Anybody else in here get the vibe that anons are hating on August because she was a sex worker and many of the cows that get made fun of on here happen to also be sex workers? I'll probably be told that I'm reaching, but it feels like jealousy.

No. 215604

>>215601
How sad do you have to be to be jealous of a porn star?

Maybe so many porn stars are lol cows because the same issues that cause people to be cows are similar to the ones that cause people to work in porn.

No. 215605

>>215575
How can you call gays disgusting but defend a porn star?

I don't get why I'm expected to be an ally of sex workers. They sure as fuck don't give a shit about me or my problems.

No. 215606

Why she got criticism doesn't matter as much as how that criticism led to her suicide, imo.

I can't even imagine the pain that she was in at the moment she decided to take her own life.

How can this be prevented in the future? She's not the first person to kill herself after getting negative attention online, and unfortunately she won't be the last, but is there any way to at least lessen the number?

No. 215607

>>215601
>jealous of a pornstar
MY FUCKING SIDES

Anyway, I'm one if the anons against her tweets and I think shaming sex workers is very wrong. I don't even participate in the threads about sex workers at all.

No. 215608

>>215601
>"You guys are just jealous."
Said every cow that's posted here.

I'm sure anons are soooo jelly of a dead woman.

No. 215610

>>215604
I mean, a lot of farmers are denizens of /cgl/ so would I be shocked if they were jealous of a girl who gets paid to be ogled at and fucked? No, not really considering they're the same girls who wish they got famous the way Nigri, Bellechere, and Yaya did.

>>215605
Tbh I don't get why I'm expected to be an ally of gay men when they don't give a fuck about me or my problems. Am I supposed to fawn over them just because they're sassy and dominate the fashion industry with their shit-tier designs or something?

No. 215611

>>215609
>Anyone saying that you're not allowed to turn anyone down for any fucking reason you please, is a rapist supporter and a sack of shit.
I don't know why I'm repeating this because if you haven't gotten it through your head by now, clearly you're too fucking stupid to get it now.

No one speaking against her gives a fuck that she didn't want to have sex with him. Not a single person in this thread has made it about that other than you people defending her. This has been repeated like ten fucking times.

It's the fact that she singled out a man for doing gay porn (that hadn't even done it on a decade and had been tested since) as a possible threat, as if he was more so than anyone else she's fucked in her 300 movies, and shamed the porn industry for pairing women with anyone whose done gay porn. It's the fact that she acted like straight porn was so safe, but those gays they'll kill ya.

It has nothing to do with the fact she doesn't want to fuck gays. That's not what her fucking tweet was about, she was publicly blasting a person and her employers for wanting to pair her with someone for doing gay porn. No one else in this thread has made it about that except you people.

One more time because y'all apparently can't read if you haven't got it by now: no one cares that she won't fuck gays.

So, you can take your "RAPIST ENABLERS!" bullshit and shove it up your ass.

Also, Roman Polanski is a piece if shit who deserves to rot the rest of his life in prison.

No. 215612

>>215609
>Feminism has never been against rape.
You're one deluded cow.

Women who don't want to catch STDs, have sex with seedy people, or become victims of sexist/misogynistic bullshit DON'T BECOME PORN ACTRESSES. And IF they make the choice to become porn actresses, they don't act like pornography was ever a safe space where straight actors magically have no STDs and the only ones who have em are the fags. Or that they'd never have to film with a guy who's put his pecker in another man before because that's literally what the industry demands.
>"I don't want to have sex with a queer because he might have HIV even though he doesn't. But I will film myself having unprotected oral, anal, and vaginal sex on hundreds of straight dudes because I care a lot about not getting an STD."
The contradiction is LOST on you because you have an agenda to make this about fags and trannies.
BTW you have a tranny containment thread already.

No. 215613

>>215593
We (the three posts above) are just saying that women shouldn't be bullied into being gay "allies" just because we fight under a similar flag when gay men are often misogynistic as fuck and don't get called for it because ~omg that would be homophobic~.

They get to shit on women's appearance, say menstruation is disgusting, etc etc and it's okay because they don't see women as potential partners so it's somehow not misogynistic. Oh, and it's apparently also okay when they insult a woman for being with a man they want, or a man they think is gay.

I'll defend gay rights on principle, and I don't hate them as a group, but from personal experience, gay men do tend to be pieces of shit. They're still men, the fact that they take it up the ass doesn't change that.

No. 215614

>>215613
>are just saying that women shouldn't be bullied into being gay "allies"
Stop with this bullshit strawman already. Nobody is asking her to be an ally.
The argument is about her stereotyping a fag about having a serious STD when he didn't actually have it, meanwhile she's been fucking unprotected straight guys for hundreds of films and there's no telling if she would've, or had, gotten an STD from them already.
If the argument is
>STD tests aren't reliable and that's why she's discriminating against the fag based on stats
Then the tests were just as unreliable for all the straight men she fucked as well. It makes no sense.

AFTER ALL, she could have just said "I don't want to shoot this project," and been done with it. But no, she brought his orientation into it as if it had any merit.
Would it be different if she had said "I won't fuck a black man because they're more likely to have STDs"? Yes you say? Gee, maybe because it's tone deaf and insensitive towards a group of people who've been marginalized before. She based her bias on a way of interpreting statistics that is made irrelevant by modern screenings and preventative medication. If STDs were that spooky for her, again, she wouldn't have raw-dogged so many straight men in the first place.

No. 215619

>>215606
She seemed like she had thin skin

>>215610
You're retarded if you think Nigiri or costhots are like porn stars

>>215616

Except the guy hadn't done gay porn in like 10 years

No. 215620

>>215616
She singled him out and shamed them for daring to put her with a gay porn star, anon. She could have… Idk not slept with him, but not singled him out because he has a somewhat higher chance of HIV? Ffs, those with HIV are still in the minority among gay people.

What if a guy singled her out and was like "warning: this girl has been in 300 porn movies, she might have aids"? You'd probably be freaking out over slutshaming.

If you don't see how publicly insinuating someone might have HIV because they've done gay porn when you've done 300 straight porn movies is homophobic, you're a fucking idiot and homophobic yourself. I don't know what else to tell you.

And stop fucking acting like we're pro-rape. That's the worst case of reaching I've ever seen on this site.

No. 215621

>>215597
>thinking there is only one person ITT disagreeing with you and thinking they all think the same things

You are retarded, but whatever makes you sleep better at night.

No. 215622

>>215606

She killed herself probably due being in an abusive relationship (her husband dated another porn star that also took her life), being traumatized by working in the porn industry, maybe drug usage which is very common with sex workers, the hate she got online was just one more thing to it.

No. 215623

>>215616
You realize you just responded to a post emphatic about how it's not about her choosing not to have sex with him… by again making it about how she chose not to have sex with him and completely ignoring everything else. And you're also making it about "being against rape" even though that idiotic argument you had was also quashed.

It's official, you guys are fucking dumb and have no valid arguments.

No. 215624

>>215609
The fact you blame feminism for all these things but carefully pick demonstrations of LIBERAL feminists and ignore radical and marxist feminists show that you clearly have an agenda in this thread. Radicals have been accusing liberals of all these things for decades, but it's only heard when a conservative says it.

No. 215625

>>215621
What the fuck are you talking about? Notice how the post says "you guys" as in plural. Never is it said there's only one person.

Your side is the one who keeps acting like they're responding to the same person.

No. 215626

File: 1512940581469.jpg (71.9 KB, 537x399, qJFr0qe.jpg)

Ya'll discussing this as if "lefties" killed her directly via twitter comments. She was clearly already on edge for other reasons, no one to blame here other than her close ones and herself.

No. 215627

>>215616
>yes, the filthy slut had it coming.
Lol, well if you want to word it that dramatically–'statistically'–YES SHE DID.
Am I not allowed to use statistics against your arguments? Are we only allowed to bring up statistics when it's in the interest of crushing fags?
People who care about not catching STDs don't work as sex workers having unprotected sex.

>she thinks she's entitled to a safe work environment

Who was denying her the "safe" (lol) work environment?
The gay man would've underwent the same screenings a straight man would have. There's nothing that makes sex with that gay man necessarily unsafe if he's proven to have no STDs. Therefore, she'd be rejecting him solely on the basis that he's a fag–which, since she aired that preference very publicly, does make her sound homophobic.

>she didn't subscribe to your brand of feminism

I find this ironic when this WHOLE TIME your side has been accusing me and others of being men just because we don't subscribe to your brand of feminism! And what kind of "feminist" are you that you can't see how pornography is inherently misogynistic and sexist and that one probably shouldn't support it if they're claiming to want bodily respect and choice? It's a joke.

>She had every right to believe this

Nobody has the right to go around publicly accusing others of having HIV without proof. I'd raise a brow if she accused someone straight of this as well.
>she had every right to have unprotected sex with some guys
Some? Lol, try a lot.
And yes, she has that right but she's a HYPOCRITE for crying about catching HIV from a fag who doesn't have it while banging the other men's she's fucked with less scrutiny just because they're straight. Even men who are "straight" in name have done gay porn. It's so stupid, if everyone is subjected to the same testing then she has as much chance catching an STD from a straight man than a gay one.


>>215621
But of course, everyone who disagrees with you must be a samefag. Lmao.

No. 215630

>>215626
We brought that up a longggg time ago but then anons started to switch the argument to make it about feminism bullying sex workers into rape and being forced to fuck fags or some shit. Now here we are.

No. 215631

>>215624
Lol no one gives a shit what radical and Marxist feminists think

>>215626
True

>>215620
>What if a guy singled her out and was like "warning: this girl has been in 300 porn movies, she might have aids"? You'd probably be freaking out over slutshaming.
That's a good way to put things.

No. 215632

>>215626
So I see arguments like this and wonder why the virtue signaling assholes who told her to eat a cyanide pill couldn't just "walk away from the screen" when they saw her tweet. They acted like her venting over being replaced because she wouldn't fuck a gay man suddenly meant their marriage rights would be taken away and they'd be thrown off rooftops. It was ridiculous. A lot of the tweets were deleted once it came out she killed herself because people were too much of a pussy to admit they said nasty shit to her. But the people tweeting at her were overreacting.

I feel bad for her. I listened to that podcast she was on and apparently she was molested by her grandfather and when she opened up about it to her father, she was told she was lying. She also tried going to therapy but felt they immediately dismissed her issues because she did porn. Sounds like a lot of posts in the vent and confession threads yet everyone here is attacking her being pushed to the edge.

The hypocrisy in this thread and about this situation over all is appalling.

No. 215633

File: 1512942609063.jpg (38.23 KB, 507x640, rn3OpACYQ6I.jpg)

>>215632
>assholes who told her to eat a cyanide pill couldn't just "walk away from the screen" when they saw her tweet
Irrelevant, I wasn't defending anyone.

>I feel bad for her.

Cool. No one is trying to change your mind on that.

No. 215634

>>215632
>So I see arguments like this and wonder why the virtue signaling assholes who told her to eat a cyanide pill couldn't just "walk away from the screen" when they saw her tweet.
No need to get on your high horse. Why does anyone here get upset/annoyed at what lolcows do instead of ignoring here?

>But the people tweeting at her were overreacting.

Yeah but suicide is even more of an overreaction.

>Sounds like a lot of posts in the vent and confession threads yet everyone here is attacking her being pushed to the edge.

What does this have to do with anything? It still means most of her suicide had to do with her mental health issues, not "bullying".

>The hypocrisy in this thread and about this situation over all is appalling.

How do you know who is a hypocrite and who isn't? You don't know any of my beliefs that's for sure.

SJW, incel, or whatever, just don't kill yourself and learn how to deal with a situation like this. Or think about what you say if you don't want blowback.

No. 215638

>>215616
>Having unprotected sex with a straight man is way safer that having sex with a man who is into gay sex. It's a fact, sorry that it hurts your fee-fees.
Right, and having unprotected sex with hundreds of men, especially in the context of porn, is incredibly unsafe and you can't claim to be that concerned about your health if you do it unless you're an idiot. Sorry to hurt your fee fees.

It's like you think straight men are immune to it or something.

No. 215641

>>215632
>The hypocrisy in this thread and about this situation over all is appalling.
What hypocrisy is there other than the anons sperging about how gays have a higher STD rate, but acting like being in almost 300 pornos is totes nbd?

No. 215648

>>215641
Acting in 300 pornos doesn't mean disregarding completely your health (and she was negative after all that, she probably was caring about this).
It's always funny how liberals wants women to have choice but only those they deem OK. Being in 300 porns = suddenly you can't refuse anything because you've already put yourself in danger.
Next, you're going to tell us if a woman is raped at a party, she shouldn't make such a fuss if it happens a second time, because at this point she was going at parties and shit, so she shouldn't be whinning about the possibility of getting rape?

No. 215653

File: 1512949519728.gif (918.1 KB, 177x228, 34455.gif)

>>215648
They're just gonna reply with, "DON'T MAKE DIS BOUT RAEP!1!1!!" and avoid the situation entirely while accusing everybody else of not understanding them and having an agenda. Like god forbid you see through bullshit. Must mean you have an agenda.

No. 215659

>>215641
>>215634
>>215638
>>215633
And many more, but I'm not bothering to scroll–

You are the most repellent samefag I've ever seen. Stop sperging. You were at it all day yesterday and now you're back for another try. How about you accept that a bunch of people here disagree with you? You have so much self loathing and it's really sad.

No. 215660

>>215641
Sweetie. You are the only one sperging. Go outside and stop working yourself up over the gay men who need your support. They don't give a shit about you. They think your cunt stinks like rotten haddock. Have a great day.(infighting)

No. 215662

lol this whole thread is a dumpster fire filled with virtue signallers engaging in another round of cannibalizing their own, THAT DEAD GIRL WAS A WHORE NO1CURR, just lol

>>215633
3edgy5me

No. 215663

>>215648

Don't bother. These are self hating women.

No. 215664

>>215662
How's anything I said edgy?

No. 215666

File: 1512952756951.jpg (33.73 KB, 557x360, QPUQ7BAVPw0.jpg)

>>215648
>Acting in 300 pornos doesn't mean disregarding completely your health
No one claimed that. Acting in gay porn does not mean disregarding your health either. Anon just pointed out it's hypocritical to assume having 300+ straight dicks in all of your holes is less risque than having gay pooper sex once.

>Being in 300 porns = suddenly you can't refuse anything because you've already put yourself in danger.

Anyone can refuse sex for whatever reason, I think it was said enough times already.

>>215660
>They think your cunt stinks like rotten haddock.
You seem to have some personal issues.

No. 215675

>>215663
We're self-hating because we're not in denial that it's fucking dumb to do 300 porn films if you're so fucking paranoid about getting STDs? We're self-hating because we aren't delusional enough to not see how publicly calling someone out for possibly having HIV because they did gay shit ten years ago is homophobic? We're self hating for pointing out it's hypocritical for someone to do that when they themselves are high risk since they've been in hundreds of porn films?

You guys are fucking crazy. Like for real.

>>215666
We'd have better luck talking to a wall. These idiots are just parroting how we're wanting this girl to be forced to have sex against her will, despite that's been debunked 100 times now because they have no argument and don't want to face the music that they're fucking homophobes.

No. 215676

>>215659
One of those posts is mine and I'm none of the others.

Please fuck off with the calling samefag on everyone who disagrees with you.

No. 215677

It's heartbreaking that she killed herself. One thing is that she posted her last tweet saying "fuck y'all" online before killing herself. That's not how I would want to be remembered on Earth. I have major second-hand embarrassment for her and for her family. She left the world without much dignity, so I feel bad for her family who have to deal with seeing cruel, trolling tweets and snarky comments about her death.

I wish people would be more careful in expressing their opinions on social media or else they may get attacked by others. This is what people need to expect! If you can't handle social media or can't deal with different opinions, then don't talk about certain issues or don't tweet at all.

I read that August Ames was already depressed but she decided to use social media anyway to tweet things that people found offensive.

I hate how some public figures don't know how to keep their lives or opinions private. There's a reason why certain public figures like Angelina Jolie or Leonardo DiCaprio don't tweet, blab and share their personal lives. They keep quiet on it and just share info about their current projects and sound all polite and professional online.

No. 215679

>>215677
>I wish people would be more careful in expressing their opinions on social media or else they may get attacked by others. This is what people need to expect! If you can't handle social media or can't deal with different opinions, then don't talk about certain issues or don't tweet at all.

This this this. There's a reason why I never post anything controversial to social media. I have a strong opinion, I post it to some anonymous site. People post shit that obviously someone is gonna find offensive then freak out when they inevitably do. People simply don't understand that freedom of speech goes both ways.

No. 215680

>>215679
>>215679
Look at the recent examples of Tyrese Gibson who practically had a meltdown (or nervous breakdown?) when he posted so much personal, private details on his social media about his family life and his divorce and custody battle. I have no idea why a movie star like him thinks he's obligated to tell everyone about his problems. Like dude, STFU and keep it private for your family and don't tell anyone what you are going through! People made fun of him and attacked him mercilessly and he had a breakdown because of it.

No. 215682

>>215648
>Being in 300 porns = suddenly you can't refuse anything because you've already put yourself in danger.
No, but it means you're a massive hypocrite for shaming the industry for pairing women with former gay porn actors and saying a specific person is a risk based on the fact he did it

Why are you people so hellbent on ignoring every single time we say that we don't care she personally chooses not to have sex with gay porn actors? You act like this is what the entire conversation is over when what we're talking about has been clarified time and time again. Yet that's the thing you choose to zoom in on and one of you even reached to the stars to say we were enabling rape, despite constant reassurance we don't fault her for not sleeping with people she doesn't want to. You act like that's all she said in her Tweet, like there was nothing else said.

None of you ever addressed a question in a previous post: how would you feel if a man posted a warning telling people to not sleep with her because she has been in 300 porn films and might give them an STD?

No. 215693

>>215679
How is bullying someone to death freedom of speech?

Well, I suppose you are american and you guys can be racist and sexist in public with few to no consequences.

No. 215695

>>215693
Who said anything about bullying someone to death? You guys have done nothing in this thread beside put words in everyone's mouths. I don't believe telling someone to kill themselves should be considered free speech, but criticizing them for what they sure sure as hell is.

>Well, I suppose you are american and you guys can be racist and sexist in public with few to no consequences.

Wtf, I was literally saying that in reference to those types, including fucking homophobia, but that one doesn't seem to count to you.

No. 215698

File: 1512963483074.jpg (181.14 KB, 1680x1050, fry_suspicious.jpg)

>>215693
>How is bullying someone to death freedom of speech?

Saying mean things on Twitter isn't "bullying to death."

>you are american and you guys can be racist and sexist in public with few to no consequences


But airing discriminatory stereotypes about a gay person and accusing people of having STDs is a-okay in your book, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~?

Maybe this is a low key troll at this point. Nobody is actually this thick in the head.

No. 215699

>>215677
>>215679
This >>215693
>or else they may get attacked by others.
>This is what people need to expect!
>If you can't handle social media or can't deal with different opinions, then don't talk about certain issues or don't tweet at all.

So… people should expect bullying and harassment? The ones who should police themselves are the people expressing their opinions, not the bullies? Wow, that's nice. Good thing we have these nice, brave, tolerant social justice warriors fighting for us.

Maybe THEY shouldn't be using social media if they can't deal with different opinions without attacking whoever disagrees with them and telling the person to kill themselves?

No. 215714

>>215699
>So… people should expect bullying and harassment?

You got it.
Substitute a gay man for any other kind of minority group and it's easy to see why people would take offense to a negative opinion with poor logic.
>"Did you know black people are more likely to have HIV? Haha, well good luck to the porn actress fucking one tomorrow. I care too much for my health to fuck blacks."
You're telling me you wouldn't expect anyone to find that racist? It is a statistical fact that black people carry the biggest HIV burden.
So you can stop pretending like extreme opinions don't beg for backlash.

Notice you have no sympathy for the gay guy who actually didn't have HIV, hasn't done gay porn in a decade, but still was falsely stereotyped by her.

No. 215726

File: 1512965138090.jpeg (74.18 KB, 356x374, 1505551605586.jpeg)

>>215714
>Notice you have no sympathy for the gay guy who actually didn't have HIV, hasn't done gay porn in a decade, but still was falsely stereotyped by her.
Yeah, but homophobia plays no role in their thought process at all. Say otherwise and you support rape.

No. 215740

File: 1512966597340.jpg (83.14 KB, 960x597, k5879HPRSh8.jpg)

>>215699
>So… people should expect bullying and harassment?
Can't believe you're asking this on an imageboard. Yes, it's the internet. The internet is cruel.

>Maybe THEY shouldn't be using social media if they can't deal with different opinions without attacking whoever disagrees with them and telling the person to kill themselves?

Maybe they shouldn't. Still, have to expect it. Especially if you're a sensitive person.

>>215726
>Yeah, but homophobia plays no role in their thought process at all. Say otherwise and you support rape
I was with you until the last sentence. How do you even connect supporting rape to this.

No. 215743

>>215726
Right?
If anon thinks mean tweets are bullying, then she's the biggest bitch for slandering someone by saying they must have HIV. Afaik it's a pretty serious charge to accuse someone of having it and trying to criminally infect people.

No. 215744

>>215740
>How do you even connect supporting rape to this.

I think anon meant that sarcastically because earlier in the thread when anons were trying to explain why it was homophobic, these people reached to say that we were suggesting women shouldn't have choices and that fags should rape them.

No. 215753

>>215682
I adressed it and said it you would seem fair to me. Being a man leave you with the choice of deeming something to risky to do, just like being a 300+ set pornstar.

Also good grief, so I'm guessing nurses not wanting to get HIV and asking for strict security measures are massive hypocrites? They shouldn't draw blood daily if they were so afraid!

Also stop making it about the fact she supposedly was singling out one guy. She wasn't naming him, she was making a point about not wanting to do a certain thing. Yeah, maybe that guy wasn't positive, who knows. Gay guys are still statically more at risk and denying it is horse shit.

No. 215756

>>215753
>guessing nurses not wanting to get HIV
Are the nurses fucking the patients too?

But seriously, nurses need to assume precaution because there are pathogens that are contagious even after they are exposed to air, and they are not able to test patients beforehand like a porn star is able to get test results before fucking. Your analogy doesn't work because nurses take precautions for everyone, and don't discriminate their level of caution because of the patient's sexual orientation, race, or gender.

>she wasn't naming him

She named the event. Doesn't take a high IQ to figure the guy and girl featured would be the people she vaguetweeted about.

>she was making a point about not wanting to do a certain thing

Because he was a fag.

>gay guys are still statistically more at risk

And black people are statistically more at risk too.
As are drug users.
And people who raw dog without protection.
But we won't hear her object to people with those parameters because they're not fags.
You're the one in denial and it's honestly sad.

No. 215757

>>215740
I know the internet is cruel, but we're not talking about imageboards here, we're talking about social networks. Maybe you haven't left your room in a while, but out there we have normies populating facebook and twitter en masse. These people don't know as much about the internet as we do, saying "welp they should know better" is retarded.

Also, we're talking about SJWs and people concerned with "bigotry" here. You can't call this girl a hypocrite then turn around and say that it's fine for politically correct people to bully someone for not being perfectly PC.

No. 215758

>>215757
>bully someone for not being perfectly PC

Quit trying to minimize what she did. She accused someone of having HIV and then tried to hide behind a bullshit, irrelevant statistic because she didn't want to admit she's prejudiced against gay men.
You can't say statistics mean something and then ignore the fact that she had sex with black men and fucked unprotected because there are, conveniently, statistics also showing that black men have higher rates of HIV and that unprotected sex leads to more STD transmissions.

She was full of shit, and now you're full of shit. Full circle.

No. 215762

>>215758
Uh… thanks for confirming that you're a hypocrite?

No. 215763

>>215757

>Also, we're talking about SJWs and people concerned with "bigotry" here. You can't call this girl a hypocrite then turn around and say that it's fine for politically correct people to bully someone for not being perfectly PC.


That statement ends the thread, but don't expect anyone here who's REEEEEEEing to hear you. This thread is teeming with salty SJW's who can't let the thread die because they need to prove to you how wrongthinky you are.

It's not their fault. They're about as bright as a religious zealot. That's the other reason they can't walk away. They're proselytizing right now, and you're just supposed to sit there and nod like a good little idiot.

Oh well.

No. 215767

>>215762
Thanks for proving that you'll ignore something if it doesn't fit your "SJWS R BOOLIES" narrative.

No. 215769

>>215758
Clearly she should be burnt at the stake for all of that. Sure is a good thing for you that she necked herself.

No. 215770

Here’s the problem. We all agree that no one should have sex unless it is consensual. Her rules for herself included not having sex with other partners who have had homosexual sex. Okay? And? Big deal if she fucked black guys, or anyone else within the higher range of STD transmission statistics. She didn’t want to have sex with someone- full stop. AND she asked for disclosure from the company whom was representing- which they did not provide. So, here we have a person, who entered into a position of WORK- who did not want to fuck a person she did not want to fuck- after the agency she was working with neglected to inform her of one of her deal breakers. And she’s the bad guy? Wtf.

In no way, shape or form did she openly condem all gays to burn in Hell. That’s the problem with SJW- they think that agreeing and accepting are the exact same thing.

She didn’t have to fuck a gay guy to prove she’s socially with it. She can actually not like gay people, (or simply not want to fuck them) AND let them live their lives.

The people who went after her and defending the mob are full on retarded. Everyone has standards. If I don’t want to fuck a red head, ya’ll coming for me? Fuck outta here.

No. 215772

>>215740
Anon, my post was completely sarcastic.

No. 215775

>>215763
This may come as a shock to you anon, but you can acknowledge her tweets were fucked up without condoning people telling g her to kill herself. In fact, no one in here says they're okay with that. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

No. 215776

>>215768
>>215769
Nobody said that retard. See >>215775 if you're still too dumb to fucking get it.

No. 215779

>>215756

Nurse here: we DO take extra precaution with known HIV+ patients, as well as anyone carrying communicable diseases. Hospitals screen for that sort of thing based off of suspicion. Is that wrong, too? We don’t treat them like a regular patient. There are always more precautions the higher the risk. It’s why hospitals and offices usually have anti contamination rooms and gear for people with stuff like TB, or C Diff- and why no visitors are allowed to those hospitalized with such a thing.

Not everyone gets the same treatment. That doesn’t even make sense. You bet I’m wearier taking care of someone with a communicable disease, rather than something like cancer or heart disease. But I do it because it’s my job, and most importantly: my choice.

No. 215781

>>215770
>She didn’t want to have sex with someone- full stop.

She didn't just say she didn't want to fuck a gay dude, or better yet have kept that preference to herself. She's the one who had to try to explain her way out of looking homophobic by bringing up statistics. It matters because SHE IS THE ONE who made it so statistics are what drives her sexual choices, which we've clearly debunked if she actually gave a fuck about that.
Sorry, but you can't get out of that by saying "who cares."

>after the agency she was working with neglected to inform her of one of her deal breakers

If they didn't inform her then how did she know who it was?

>in no way, shape or form did she openly condem all gays to burn in Hell

Non-argument because you have nothing else to strawman about. Nobody in this thread claims she wanted gays to die.

>she didn't have to fuck a gay guy to prove she's socially with it

Another non-argument strawman. Nobody is saying she should be forced to fuck a gay man. She just shouldn't have tried to reenforce her preference with sloppily done cherrypicking of statistics and an empty concern about her health when she's done statistically riskier sex scenes. That's what makes it bullshit and makes her homophobia so transparent.

>people who went after her are retarded

People should probably stop the edgelord shit like telling people to kill themselves, but they had every right to voice their opinions like she did aside from that. Free speech works both ways.

>If I don't want to fuck a red head

Well are you going to abuse a statistic you pulled out your ass and pretend you have standards about STDs after you've let about 500 tramps root you in the ass without a condom? Probably not.

No. 215784

>>215779
You're twisting the argument and clearly didn't read it.

Initial intake: You know nothing of that person's communicable diseases. You don't know that they're unhealthy or not. Therefore, regardless of suspicion, you handle everyone with precaution.

>"But but muh containment wards and limited visitors after we knowwww"

And? Once porn stars are found to have severe STDs like HIV+ they're often not recruited or allowed to work with negative persons. And then, they too, are forced to take precautions like wearing condoms and taking medications if they decide to continue their career.

No. 215786

>>215781

I can’t really assume anything about the company other than she requested to not work with gay guys, and they gave her the actors name right before the shooting. She’s entitled to know who she’s working with, in the same regard she can choose not to work with them.

It doesn’t matter if her rationale was a statistic. The statistic is true. Gay men carry a higher risk of transmission. It’s not cherry picked, it’s a fact. It’s why there was an AIDS epidemic in the gay community in the 80’s. It’s why sexual health is something incredibly important, and sexual health clinics exist with AIDS prevention, specifically for the queer communities.
Most sexual health clinics/classes that focus on all sexual health don’t have as big of a focus on it, for veritable reasons.

She’s allowed to pick that statistic and be uncomfortable with it.

What should she have done? Why isn’t she allowed to be vocal about not wanting to fuck gay dudes?

For the sake of argument: if she hated gays, who actually cares? She didn’t say anything other than she was uncomfortable with the situation she was in.

No. 215789


No. 215791

>>215786
>I can’t really assume anything about the company other than she requested to not work with gay guys, and they gave her the actors name right before the shooting.
Maybe the company had no reason to believe he still identified as gay considering his last shoot was over a decade ago.

>The statistic is true.

Nobody is saying the statistic isn't true, but it's irrelevant considering the amount of screenings that porn actors go through. Today's HIV rates are nothing like the 80s.
Why will you hold others to standard about this gay man statistic when other statistics such as black men having high HIV transmission rates, and unprotected sex having high transmission rates, goes unchecked to her and to you?
Those statistics aren't false either.

>She’s allowed to pick that statistic and be uncomfortable with it.

Sure, but she looks like a hypocritical moron as she has unprotected sex with a bunch of black guys.

>What should she have done?

Why are you acting like she was forced to Tweet about it? Why are you implying that her sexual preferences must be aired publicly and have a gay person shamed because an agency didn't give her the disclosure?

>if she hated gays, who actually cares?

I presume other gay/bi people who are tired of industry stereotypes.

>She didn’t say anything other than she was uncomfortable with the situation she was in.


"whichever (lady) performer is replacing me tomorrow for @EroticaXNews, you're shooting with a guy who has shot gay porn, just to let cha know. BS is all I can say. Do agents really not care about who they're representing? #ladirect I do my homework for my body."

The word "uncomfortable" isn't even in that Tweet. She was just being bitchy towards some rando gay man because the agency screwed her. She didn't have to imply he might be HIV+ to get her point about not wanting to work with gay people across.
Come the hell on.

No. 215792

>>215791

Gay men who shoot gay porn, (assuming he’s gay) also have gay sex with other men. Regardless of who he’s sleeping with now, if he wanted to donate blood, he’d have to answer that he has, in his lifetime, had sex with men.

Even if his prior shoots were far off, I find it hard to believe he’s been celibate for 10 years. Being out of the business for 10 years would make me MORE inclined to side with her, in that any standard he once had for regular testing (which is actually different in gay porn) has gone to the wayside, and only done when he felt necessary, whenever that may be. Should he have contracted HIV or certain diseases a few weeks ago, it wouldn’t have shown up on an immediate panel for the shoot. She’s 100% right to be weary in that regard.

We have laws in place for gays to not donate blood, either. For the same reason.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/banned-life-why-gay-men-still-cant-donate-blood-6C10622947

This is a pretty good article on that topic. It takes 7-10 days on a test to show up if you’re HIV positive now, for things like a blood donation. We don’t know when he took the test, how long they waited to view the results, or when his last unprotected sexual encounter had been. Or even if he was exposed at all.

Why does it matter how many black cocks she took? We still get in a car and drive, every day. It’s the most dangerous form of transportation, and everyone does it. You don’t want to die, I assume. So why drive?

Most people put on their seatbelts, though. For safety.

This is what she, and statistics say will keep her safe: not having sex with someone whose also had gay sex with a man.

She’s allowed to be mad at the agency that didn’t give her all the important information about her performing partners.

I don’t get why we have to keep bringing up that she fucks black dudes. They’re still not as high of a risk for AIDS as gay men. Admittedly, they’re higher, but they also wouldn’t have the same leisure sex that’s prevalent in the gay community.

No. 215793

>>215791

>What should she have done?

Why are you acting like she was forced to Tweet about it? Why are you implying that her sexual preferences must be aired publicly and have a gay person shamed because an agency didn't give her the disclosure?

Also: why is pointing this out shaming the guy? How does not wanting to engage in statistically riskier behavior SHAME him, he who was not named?

When I read the story I didn’t give 2 shits who was, or wasn’t fucking who. I just didn’t get why the company wasn’t forthcoming about what she seemed invested in. In the end, that’s what was important.

It’s almost as if the porn industry is built on the exploitation of women, and no one actually cares what their preferences are! I was always more concerned with WHY her preferences are being disregarded, in lieu of some fictive narrative where we all need to be 100% perfectly monogamous, and never engage in any risky behavior in order for the idea of self preservation to carry merit.

Effectively, you’re saying that her experiences as a porn Star have made her drive to protect herself from harm less valuable BECAUSE of the black dicks she’s ridden.

I don’t know where to start, the misogyny or blatant racism! /s

No. 215795

Personally, I’m voting for the “porn stars who take black cock unprotected in the ass still deserve full disclosure on sexual partners within the industry, in an effort to determine the risks associated and directly intertwined with their own health, and should be allowed to not fuck gays, or anyone else, should they so decide that the risk outweighs the reward of taking dick in the money, for money” party.

No. 215796

>>215792
>poor analogies again

Lol, anon they simply don't work.
Just because the US doesn't allow gay men to donate blood (yet) doesn't mean other countries don't, or that as long as they meet certain requirements.
If that same gay man wanted to donate blood in Canada, he could granted he was at least 1 year celibate from the last time he screwed another man. Do you happen to know what a "deferral" means?
Look it up.

And do you know why countries are easing up on blood donations from high risk groups? Because the screenings are effective and efficient and the demand for blood is too damn high to be turning people away based on oogey boogey stereotypes.

Now, to address other things:
>Should he have contracted HIV or certain diseases a few weeks ago, it wouldn’t have shown up on an immediate panel for the shoot.
As it would for anyone else straight or not.

>Why does it matter how many black cocks she took?

Because behind gay/bisexual men, black people are the second highest group to contract and transmit HIV in the US.
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/racialethnic/africanamericans/index.html

>So why drive?

Is taking black dick–no, scratch that–is being a porn actress having unprotected sex with anyone not gay as essential as driving? Nah.

>most people put on seatbelts for safety

Most people wear condoms and take medications if they don't want to contract HIV.

>statistics will keep her safe

Then statistically she should've stopped being a sex worker.

>she’s allowed to be mad at the agency

Didn't say she shouldn't be.

>black dudes are not as high of a risk

Doesn't matter. A risk is a risk if she wanted it to be about her health. But she didn't care, she killed herself.

>>215793
>why is pointing this out shaming the guy
Just because someone belongs to a group doesn't mean they're infected with HIV? She's based her decision to not fuck gays on that they may have HIV. She didn't have to name him for people to figure out who it was shooting that day and for them to associate his identity with questions about his HIV- status. Power of suggestion, dear anon.
It's like high schoolers accusing the promiscuous girl of having an STD because she had a few sex partners (statistically 'true,' but not necessarily the case AND a stereotype).

>It’s almost as if the porn industry is built on the exploitation of women.

But huzzah as long as they can say they've got their money while others suffer for other reasons? That's not the only problem with porn industries.

>why are her preferences being disregarded

Again, for the umpteenth time, nobody is saying she should be forced to fuck gay people. But that doesn't justify unfair generalizations and being untactful when airing those preferences publicly.

>you're saying that her experiences as a porn star have made her drive to protect herself from harm less valuable

As a matter of speaking–again–if she cared about her bodily health and STD statistics, she likely would not be a porn actress. When you join certain occupations you accept that there is risk involved.
Scenario: A cop wants to patrol in a black neighborhood, and statistically, black people are responsible for more crime. Does that give the cop the right to racially stereotype and be more aggressive towards blacks on the generalizations that they may be more difficult and criminal? What's that? That's racist you say…?

>misogyny

How? A porn star has done more to promote misogyny than I ever have with simple lolcow posts. You're reaching.
>You're a racist for bringing up black statistics
…but it's okay for her to bring up gay statistics and she's not being homophobic?

No. 215799

>>215253
>>215796
Honestly? I’m done. They’re not poor analogies, you’re just not very bright, to the point where you didn’t even see the /s in my post about the racism or misogyny.

You seriously don’t get why she’s allowed to pick and choose her sex partners based on what she believes is right?

I hope you’re never in the position where picking a sex partner is condemned by your own need for safety. The whole thing is ludicrous.

She’s guilty of being a porn Star, not wanting to fuck a particular group of people. That’s all. Who cares.

No. 215800

>>215799
Yeah, easier to call me dumb than admit I have a few points you can't effectively refute.

>You seriously don’t get why she’s allowed to pick and choose her sex partners based on what she believes is right?

Omfg I need those little clap emojis in between the words lmao.

For the LAST time: NO. ONE. IS. SAYING. SHE. MUST. FUCK. FAGGOTS.

She's fucking dumb though to believe she's at higher risk for HIV transmission from a screened gay dude than any other of the straight men and black men she's fucked unprotected. If she gave a shit about her bodily health and used statistics to pick what's safest, she wouldn't be a sex worker.
You tell ME what's "incorrect" about that statement. If not, piss off with your self-righteousness.

>who cares

YOU DO.

No. 215803

>>215314
>DID isn't a thing
Are you just fucking stupid and like to pretend tumblr makes up mental illness terms or something? It's an actual medical term and all you have to do is take 10 seconds of your time to look up a legitimate documentary on Youtube. Just because it's uncommon doesn't mean it does not exist. Just take two seconds to educate yourself before spitting out things you know nothing about.

>>215311
DID tends to happen in extreme cases of abuse, so I think it's very troubling she was diagnosed with that. The "multiple personalities" are really just states of disassociation, because it's like the mind is stepping back to protect itself as best as it can. She said she was molested by her grandfather and her mother was bipolar and abused her. It's likely she had "fronts" when she went through her worst episodes with them.

No. 215817

>>215803
You really rustle my jimmies by saying that documentaries are a good source of anything.

No. 215818

This chick rejecting someone for "health reasons" is like a binge drinker rejecting a cigarette for health reasons and then being self-righteous about it. Yeah it's technically true but it's laughable.

No. 215832

>people expecting anything at all from the porn industry
kek. also ffs can we not say how shit the porn industry is without people thinking we're attacking the people who are involved in it? i feel bad for people who choose to do porn, especially since the porn industry is absolute trash, hopefully this will shed light on that. (though everyone is just bitching about gay guys)

also, it's funny that she's worried about dicks in men's asses, when it's really dicks in women's asses that she has to worry about. plus, aren't american pornstars circumcised? she already has a higher chance of getting STDs from a circumcised guy, since circumcision only protects the man.

No. 215836

>>215800
>For the LAST time: NO. ONE. IS. SAYING. SHE. MUST. FUCK. FAGGOTS.
I gave up arguing with them because this has been repeated a dozen times now yet they're somehow still too retarded to understand that's not the problem or insistent on ignoring it. They've been giving numerous explanations of what was wrong with that tweet, but this is the one thing they keep coming back to, despite constant reminders that's not the problem. It's like we're having two completely different conversations.

No. 215840

Since it seems there's some confusion on this topic and one anon posted an out of date article on it- men who've had anal sex with men CAN give blood in the US now. It says so right on the Red Cross website. They just need to have abstained for a year.

No. 215842

>>215840
It's the same in some european countries as well: if you are gay or if you've had intercourse with an african or some asians as well you are't allowed to donate for a year; that might sound racist etc. but if the doctors say it's better like this, i sincerely believe they have their reasons and know what they're doing, better not risk anything just for the sake of not hurting some peoples feelings…

No. 215845

>>215836
Yeah, 'cause public lynching is in no way done to force people to do things against their will (and a fortiori people like porn actress who depend on public image), right?
People can do exactly what they want as long as they don't wrongthink out loud.

It's their choice ! They'll just get told to kill themselves, no prob, it's only a gentle reminder not to express their personnal choices regarding having sex in public.

No. 215848

>>215845
>lynching is equal to saying mean things on the internet

Stop it kid, your false equivalence are truly as ignorant as your way of thinking.

No. 215859

>>215800
And you don't care? You've dripped caring all over this thread, you greentexty samefag. I hope you make an error of judgment in the future that destroys your entire fucking life. I genuinely do.

Merry Christmas!

No. 215870

>>215859
>samefag I hope you die
Lmao just hide the thread if you're so triggered geeeeeez. Never said I don't care btw. You're the one who asked, damn.

No. 215883

>>215845
Another thing that's been clarified multiple times to you guys that you wont listen to is that no one here agrees with shit like telling people to kill themselves. No one here isn't sad she died. However, it did deserve criticism, just not at the level some people took it to.

>>215859
Way to be above the people who attacked August

No. 216229

>>215870
>>215883
Are you sure you're a woman? You're incredibly misogynist and self loathing. Sad.

No. 216251

>>216229
And you're a homophobe who's flinging those words around in contexts that aren't valid because you think that somehow justifies your shit argument.



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]