/ot/ - Bumble

Name
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment	V s}hlUKz78I%\3yjW nlrBQP_W.7!#0g3}]G\|&<8k[@S`O9>R=hsKFz/{m+NbMCVxX?$fYAq6Hvj J-t
File	(20 MB max) Imgur:
Video A}?Emkxz{Q3>re\,[L$ptU*;_v`0V]+JP7CdIR5	1708
Password	(For post deletion)

File: 1449013014115.jpg (34.23 KB, 303x349, 1416956588771.jpg)

Bumble Anonymous 12/01/15 (Tue) 11:36:54 PM No. 165627

Has anyone here had any experiences with the female-driven Tinder?

Anonymous 12/02/15 (Wed) 12:08:07 AM No. 165628

>>165627
sounds like something that encourages degeneracy and sluts

Anonymous 12/02/15 (Wed) 12:50:22 AM No. 165629

What's wrong with tinder?

Anonymous 12/02/15 (Wed) 07:11:14 AM No. 165630

>>165627

I don't know why but my mind read that as "female-driven Uber" and I was just like 'yeah ok I guess uber guys can be creepy' lmao

But I've never used Bumble, it sounds kinda silly imo. With Tinder, anyone can start the chat so it makes the process a lot quicker. I don't know…

Anonymous 12/02/15 (Wed) 07:18:14 AM No. 165631

>>165627
Are they even trying to make this thing go anywhere? The advertisement for this app is shit. If you want to convince me to approach men, at least show me a range of 8/10 boys that I may possibly meet on this app.

Anonymous 12/02/15 (Wed) 08:41:46 PM No. 165632

When I see "female-driven Tinder" I assume it's a lesbian dating app. Which speaking of, how would same-sex dating even work with that app? Also, I don't understand the point of this.

Anonymous 12/03/15 (Thu) 04:09:09 AM No. 165633

>>165632
the girl has to message the boy

Anonymous 12/03/15 (Thu) 07:27:00 AM No. 165634

>>165633
So?

Anonymous 12/03/15 (Thu) 08:17:38 AM No. 165635

>>165632
I don't really get it, either, if it works like the OP image. If both people "make a connection" why not let either of them start the conversation? What advantage does this give to the app users?

Anonymous 12/04/15 (Fri) 01:16:28 AM No. 165636

So is this app for guys tired of making the first move or something? I don't get the incentive for a girl to really try this.

Anonymous 12/04/15 (Fri) 01:54:06 AM No. 165637

I think the point is that men are always going to message a girl many times even if she does not want it. If a girl innniciates in order for the Convo to start the woman gets less spam and the man has someone who is actually interested in seeing him

Anonymous 12/04/15 (Fri) 09:45:06 AM No. 165638

i just hate the name "bumble"

Anonymous 12/05/15 (Sat) 02:23:01 AM No. 165639

>>165636
guys are expected to make the first move 100% of the time. I can imagine that is very stressful, especially when the risk of rejection is very high. I mean, the whole stupid PUA thing exists for men but a equivalent doesn't exist for women

Anonymous 12/05/15 (Sat) 11:05:48 PM No. 165640

I thought it was to reduce the amount of "ayo u wan some fuk" type messages, then again I'm not really sure how tinder works.

Anonymous 12/06/15 (Sun) 12:35:12 AM No. 165641

>>165640

this is what I thought too. But I don't think it would go anywhere, since women won't really make the first move unless they're ugly or desperate. And I can't imagine a lot of guys going on there, it really only makes sense if it's just an app for lesbians.

Anonymous 12/07/15 (Mon) 02:35:29 AM No. 165642

>>165638
I hate that they say 'girl' and not 'woman.'

There shouldn't be any girls on a dating site.

Anonymous 12/08/15 (Tue) 01:08:12 PM No. 165643

I guess they're hoping women are tired enough of being spammed with message from ugly dudes that they're willing to put in more effort themselves.

I'm not sure if it will appeal much to women, but as a shy submissive guy it's appealing. I predict having to swipe through throngs of betas.