File: 1456356449460.png (200.46 KB, 285x429, too_short_shorts.png)
No. 143849
>>143848I still firmly believe crop tops, mini skirts, short shorts and leggings have definite bmi limits.
A big pudding belly or flabby thighs in those sort of garments looks awful.
No. 143851
File: 1456359559960.jpg (375.18 KB, 1210x1600, oh god.jpg)
Please stop wearing leggings in public if you're fat.
No. 143856
>>143855I did as well, when I worked my last retail jobs because of the no jeans restrictions they had. Leggings are dance wear, meant for constant movement when sized/fit correctly, perfect for someone who is on their feet walking around all day.
If you sit on your ass all day you have no excuses. Wear pants like you are supposed to.
No. 143858
>>143857Can I wear them if I don't have a camel toe and they aren't so under-sized they're see through?
Leggings that fit don't usually have any of the issues you mentioned.
No. 143859
File: 1456528667335.jpg (17.74 KB, 300x500, yummie-tummie-shaping-leggings…)
>>143857I wear leggings like this, and I'm less curvy than the model so they are basically just pants on me. Light doesn't show through, either. There's a time and place for them of course but if I'm just going to an 8 am lecture I don't really care.
No. 143861
>>143857for this reason I wear ponte leggings.
They're made of thicker material and usually have decorative seams and shit so they don't look so basic.
Aslo I agree, they look best with a top that at least covers your but/vag
No. 143862
File: 1456529152348.jpg (238.12 KB, 930x1402, 00.jpg)
>>143860but i'd wear them at a grocery store job*
and i've never had the problem of a camel toe or having my pants be see through. maybe the fact that theyre yoga pants means theyre thicker than leggings, but theyre basically the same thing, no?
No. 143864
>>143858imo, it looks kinda trashy without something covering your ass. Leggings are basically just hoisery/tights without the feet part, so it is like you are running around with your underwear showing.
I have seen girls do their makeup and hair nice, wear a pretty blouse, but throw on leggings on bottom with nothing covering up. idk, it looks so half-dressed, like they forgot their skirt at home.
>>143862Yeah, this looks bad. Might as well go pantless, since it is basically a second layer of skin.
No. 143866
File: 1456539422142.jpg (152.54 KB, 488x750, tumblr_o2ohf3dy0I1uwqnx6o1_500…)
>>143859>I'm just going to an 8 am lecture I don't really care.I never really understood this… there's no difference in effort/ability between putting on real pants or putting on leggings/sweatpants. I hate how people treat looking decent and presentable as some kind of chore.
Everyone says leggings look good when you're thin/pretty but lets be real, how many of the people who wear leggings are thing or pretty? lmao. I think leggings look nice with some kind of well thought out fashionable outfit, but most people just wear whatever shirt and whatever shoes and looks bad and lazy.
Fat people need to stop wearing patterned leggings as well.
No. 143867
>>143864Eh, leggings are a completely different fabric so I don't think they look like hosiery.
Mine just look like right pants.
A skirt would look silly over leggings imo, because of the fabric.
No. 143869
>>143866Honestly I've never seen leggings look good on anyone. Too thick, so it looks weird under a skirt or shorts, but too form fitting so that they always look a bit obscene on their own. On top of that the form fitting aspect isn't even sexy to me, it just seems frumpy.
I'll never understand the love for them.
No. 143871
>>143866Fat people ALWAYS Look bad. Always.
And they're too lazy to lose the weight. i hate seeing them assault my eyes in public and online.
No. 143875
>>143870Nobody wears nylon leggings here anon.
They're cotton and elastane. They would look retarded under anything because they weren't meant to be footless tights.
No. 143876
>>143870I've only ever seen those called footless tights. I've never seen nylons called leggings even without the foot.
I don't own any leggings in the same material as my tights tbh, I don't wanna show my ass every time I bend over.
No. 143878
>>143877Then don't buy your leggings two sizes too small?
A pair that guys don't ride up anywhere, you only get cameltoe and visible crack when you insist you can wear something too small.
No. 143880
>>143877Because leggings obviously look nicer than sweats
I don't even understand the debate ITT. Something like 80% of the girls in my school wear leggings, it's normal and has been for several years now. Why are people still so "shocked" by them?
No. 143890
>>143886As long as the sleeves are full length.
Those floppy arm bags obeasts get make me queasy. Ankle length too.
No. 143900
File: 1460781754138.jpg (26.58 KB, 500x734, 3f4dfc555d9576bd4175d5671bcd1b…)
>>143899Do you mean like pic related anon? Or specifically when they have fat bulging underneath the pants/skirt? I personally think the crop top + high waisted pants/skirt looks cute and is probably the only way I'd wear a crop top.
No. 143903
File: 1460847313725.jpg (33 KB, 387x366, large.jpg)
I don't understand creeper shoes. At all.
No. 143908
>>143903I hated all of them at first, but then I started seeing some I did like. I wish I had a photo to post, but I haven't crossed into the "like" territory enough to save any yet.
But I always like my skinny legs/ankles in clunky boots or shoes.
No. 143909
File: 1462250024869.jpeg (683.12 KB, 2480x2480, image.jpeg)
I can't wear leggings anymore unless I'm going to the gym. I've been building lean leg muscles and losing weight so leggings outline my gains. Leggings look awkward on muscular legs imo (although I'd rather see girls with muscular legs in leggings than fatties).
No. 143912
File: 1462277987152.jpg (41.6 KB, 720x720, 1457714483498.jpg)
>>143882I wear pjs all over the damn place and i dont even give a fuck.
No. 143913
File: 1462278277001.jpg (87.14 KB, 1400x786, WomanBehavior.jpg)
if you'te wearing anything less then a full burka you're a filthy, diseased, cockteasing whore.
the only time you should get on your knees is to pray to G*d
No. 143914
File: 1462301046216.jpg (24.63 KB, 340x270, choker.jpg)
any opinions on choker necklaces? Is it too over used now? or do you guys think it looks trashy? i recently bought one similar to the pic but i dont know if i should just wear it for pictures or do i dare to go outside
No. 143915
>>143914how old are you?
Age aside, though, I think it's just those fish line chokers or anything with a fucking yin-yang that look so immature
I mean, anything you wear depends on the over all look.
No. 143916
File: 1462302870182.jpg (4.53 MB, 2212x3318, sweater-dress-with-leggings-an…)
>all this salt against fatties with leggingsWell no shit they're gonna look bad if they're paired with crop tops, bras, or the leggings have ugly ass designs on them like
>>143866.
Now I know most of you are frustrated at fattie fashions from dumblr, but
>>143873 isn't what I realistically see on fat girls on the daily.
Pic related is usually how I see fat girls wear leggings: solid colors paired with sweater dresses or long shirts with at least boots or a heel/wedge.
No. 143917
>>143916I agree with you, but I think it's just a matter of not being ignorant.
Even a skinny girl can look gross if she leaves her house looking like a fishwife.
No. 143918
>>143916for me personally it isn't because they're wearing leggings, or what they're wearing leggings with. i see girls like your pic more often too.
my #1 main issue with fat girls and leggings is that they just go for whatever leggings that "fit". this will invariably end in really stretched out fabric to the point where you can see everything and they might as be wearing pantyhose. its disgusting. no one wants to see that.
mind you, this same gripe applies to skinny girls as well but for obvious reasons it doesn't occur that often (maybe not "disgusting", but definitely trashy as fuck)
No. 143921
File: 1462310085669.jpg (225.64 KB, 1000x757, 1395516144845.jpg)
I'm kinda glad seapunk is dead. It looks ghetto and disgusting on anyone who's not super beautiful.
No. 143923
>>143918Oh gosh anon I totally know what you mean. I never even really thought about it but now I understand all the fat girl legging shame. I find it fine if the leggings fit and they dont just wear them as pants (use a sweater dress, shorts, skirt, w/e).
I was tabling at a con and I saw so many large girls with bad muffin tops or their ass hanging out of anime leggings. I've also seen what you are describing where the fabric becomes sheer and you see their pale doughy ass.
>mfw i'm a chubby-chan but at least I dress myself in clothes that fit properly No. 143925
>>143920 I'm totally on board with average body size acceptance and not being rude to fat people, but I think the cure for full on fat acceptance is better biological education. OT sorry but I wish there was more focus on showing people the way weight puts a strain on knees and fat builds up in arteries, and explaini g what that means and how to actually eat healthily. Dispel myths by teaching kids what a metabolism really is. Stop putting cheap corn syrup and sugar in everything!
>tfw none of this will happen and trying to educate people will get you called a fat shamer Agreeing with
>>143918 if you're fat and wearing leggings you need to wear firm, non-sheer leggings in your size and a top long enough to flatter your muffin top. Shape what you have, frame your body, don't just let it all hang out.
Ill fitting and cheap clothes look dumb on most people.
No. 143926
>>143925>Dispel myths by teaching kids what a metabolism really is.OT but there is actually new evidence coming to light that obese people who do attempt to lose weight experience slowed metabolisms (that is never stabilized again even at goal weight), and overweight teens and children who dieted young are more likely to be obese adults.
So while I agree that preventative measures are necessary to stop people reaching obesity to begin with, we do have to hold our prejudices and understand obese people who are legitimately making informed changes but who still struggle.
>http://www.healio.com/endocrinology/obesity/news/online/%7B68b8e361-32ed-4ead-9b4c-b26659c62e67%7D/metabolic-adaptation-persists-after-weight-loss>http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/02/health/biggest-loser-weight-loss.html?_r=0 No. 143928
>>143926the study as shown in your article is bullshit.
- they created a formula that gave them literally the results they wanted
- studies become relevant with 40 people, they only got 14
this whole thing is a joke.