/2X/ - (XX)

female socialization

sex

>>19089
that pic is fucking dumb. you should delete it.

>>19095
Found the butthurt TIF who's mad she's being called out.

>>19095
Being here also means you're a woman, lmao. Why are trans identified women pretending they're tuff men just to only hang out in women's only spaces?

>>19104
>>19112
so you don't get it. okay.
the pic is horribly outdated. it wouldn't work on a 12 year old these days. reddit is not a scary male space. tumblr is no longer for uwu sjw girlies, it's for (female) autists who don't fit in with normal women.
overall, your picture looks like something made by a boomer who thinks she's very internet proficient. embarrassing and kekworthy.

>>19114
Tumblr has always been a place for femalw outcasts like how reddit was a place for male outcasts. Online spaces are usually filled by chronically online neuro divergent(aka autistic) people regardless of gender.

>>19115
>reddit
>for autists
No kek

>>19114
All it does is validate the TIFs who use Reddit instead KEK

>>19122
And pretty much everyone uses reddit, too. The picture is truly bizarre.

>>19120
Most redditors are literally autists. Idk which anon posted the original image but the tifs itt definitely got angry as fuck.

>>19128
wake up, it's 2k23 and plebbit is one of the normiest places on the net
>point out the idiocy
>y-you're a t-tranny
really?

>>19130
Reddit isn't normie, quit lying to yourself. What kind of popular well adjusted person uses it? If you said tiktok, Instagram or other social medias I'd agree but reddit has always been autistic majority. I don't know why it offends some people that much.

can you retards post pictures at least

>>19131
>What kind of popular well adjusted person uses it?
What do you want me to say to that? You don't have to use a name on your profile, and user ShitPie69 upvoting midget gangbang porn could be anyone. /r/pics has 30mil members. /r/twoxchromosomes is at 13mil. Hell, my entire office is addicted to this dumb fucking app. It's very popular among the 25+ demographic, both men and women. And how could it not be? Reddit is an endless stream of info slop where intelligent discussion is all but impossible thanks to the karma whoring system, retarded rules, tranny jannies, and the usual dopamine addiction enabling design. Calling it a place for autists is an offense.

This thread is not radfem. Aside from the OPs picrel, It's yet another gender critical thread. It's not "radfem" to tear down vulnerable mentally ill women and girls for being "autists" because XYZ flavor of the month website is for wierdos and other petty reasons. Othering women with no good reason other than icky helps no one, only hurts women and nothing about it is "feminist".

>>19087
>Compulsory bisexuality is encouraged
What planet is this person living on? In my world the compulsory binaries of straight and gay is enforced only with little to no leeway. This is then used to justify the abuse and ownership of women by men. Women actually play into this bleakly. Bisexuality is generally downplayed and critized by both if not outright erased because it threatens the binary of sexual orientation. Homosexuals are delegated to a small reject group, lesbians are erased while both butch women and gay men are othered and made an example of bad gendered stereotypes while the remainder controls the narrative that sexual orientation is biological. This reads like a cult manifesto. Leave it at don't harass/pressure homosexual people to alter their sexual orientation because they have been historically made so which was traumatizing. The delusional shit isn't needed.

>>19089
>You write fanfiction therefore you are female
>You use Pinterest therefore you are female
Fighting harmful female stereotyping by harmful female stereotyping; fantastic logic. Surely this is bound to convince troubled women that they belong in their stereotyped should-be shamed communities. You shamed these women for using sites that they congregate in likely because there is little representation for them and escape from rapeape shit on the internet then use this to argue that they are female because it is prototypical behavior of "femaleness". This isn't radfem, this is just misogyny masquerading as gender critical.

>>19104
>Any woman who disagrees with my misognistic stereotyping is a TIF

>>19112
Stereotyping and insulting mentally ill women is radfem

>>19128
Catty petty one liner anyone who uses the popular rapeape space of Reddit known for its CP, abuse, gore, animal violence, and bringing revenge porn to the mainstream public is an "autist" as if that's the biggest problem with the site. Reddit is clearly a mainstream website that everyone uses aged 20+ with the main users being rapeapes therefore it having mainstream appeal of child porn, abuse, assault, and gore from these males. It's more important to sow differences amongst each other and distinguish who's the good normal woman and the bad fucked up ones and say who's autistic than actually pointing at what's fucked up about the site. The inhuman shit and the glutton of information by reposts, misinformation, poor quality posts and low effort content. The overall popularity contest and karma whoring.

>>19115
>Online spaces are usually filled by chronically online neuro divergent(aka autistic) people regardless of gender.
And resultingly catty, petty bullshit. How do any of you breathe and function without constantly judging your own actions online? Is your entire presence online just stewing in 'muh autism' and shit flinging it onto others? I'm tired of this trend of self-loathing self hatred where everyone accuses everyone of having autism until it loses all meaning. What exactly do you even mean by autism? Is it behavior that doesn't fit societal expectations of women? Is it not fitting stereotypes correctly? Is it overfitting stereotypes too well? I've argued with anons here before that autism has been coopted to other, different women. Many agree and some disagree, some argue it's a form of hysteria like how BPD is overdiagnosed in women as the new wandering womb. Some will defend their autism and say it's super real than proceed to use it as the standard throwaway internet insult. It's either real or its entirely a bullshit internet pejorative; it can't be both. I don't understand the logic of shitting on TIFs and whoever you randomly deem as having "autism". What is the goal besides ostracizing troubled women even further? Ostracize the fucked up ideas and logic of mentally ill women, not the women themselves. Stop this catty petty shit.

>>19086
>>19090
Thread pic has decent critism of the mainstream libfem logic of makeup and the picrel explaining the binary of biological sex.

>>19134
I love you.

Screw gender criticals. You guys keep posting your creepy book with a sexualized little girl on the cover, and your hatred for trannies is actually good ol' conservatism. You seethe when you hear "guys can wear dresses" or "girls can be butch". You hate gays. You hate women. You preach evolutionary biology like retards.
>u r a girl, fanfic glitter tumblr pinterest woo woo female behavior
Congrats, you just made me want to a-log.

>>19134
Stating the fact that most fanfiction writers are biologically women isn't misogyny. How can you classify biological women and men having different interests and preferences in media as misogyny? Do you also think it's misogynistic when small girls willingly gravitate towards dolls or small animals compared to boys?

>>19141
NTA but I recommend the book Delusions of Gender by Cordelia Fine. I am interpreting your last sentence as though it's coming from genuine ignorance and isn't intended as bait. I think the reaction you got was from calling using Pinterest female behaviour. A lot of trans-identified masculine women would read that and take it as meaning you agree they aren't really female for having interests that diverge from what you put in the female box, which defeats the meme's purpose. A major target for transition are the girls who preferred the toys labelled as boys', but by your logic they've not been socialised female.

Sorry for double posting but I don't really want to use delete like it's an edit tool.

>How can you classify biological women and men having different interests and preferences in media as misogyny?
Forcing femininity onto children because they were born female is misogyny. Unfortunately acknowledging this often has liberal feminists jumping to claim you think girls can't naturally enjoy things classified as feminine or that you think it's shameful to like pink because you hate women. By extension, actively encouraging females who reject forced femininity to identify as males is misogyny.(read lolcow.farm/info, that's what delete should be used for)

>>19141
>Stating the fact that most fanfiction writers are biologically women isn't misogyny.
It isn't but inferring that it is prototypical expected female behavior is. This is the problem with the argument in picrel; it's circular. What are women? = People who write fanfiction. What are people who write fanfiction who use these sites? = They are women. What are women? = people who write fanfiction, use tumblr, pinterest etc.

>How can you classify biological women and men having different interests and preferences in media as misogyny?
>Classify biological interests in men
Well In males the interests are misogyny, CP, gore, and violence so that's a easy one lel. Observer bias or none.

Having different "female and male interests" due to biology is a tranny argument; Women like pink therefore they are women, this is gender critical trad logic. The only truth to biological and evolutionary arguments is that males are biologically violent. Biological/evolutionary arguments are misognistic by definition. Like I said women don't have free reign on the internet unlike men. Women will be hated everywhere they go by everyone so you can't call the few enclaves they sink into like fanfic sites, Tumblr, Pinterest and LC, "biological behavior". Much of women here are here because there are no other alternatives for voicing truthful opinions. How is that explainable by biology? Wanting to avoid violence is a human instinct of self preservation, not feminized female biological behavior.

>Do you also think it's misogynistic when small girls willingly gravitate towards dolls or small animals compared to boys?
You pose an interesting question is it the chicken or the egg. Are women and girls "willingly" gravitating towards this behavior. Are women and girls interested in sterotypically highly pressured behavior that coincidentally railroads them into lower paying jobs and subjugated roles in "nature" because they biologically want to be subjugated and treated as doormats or is society pushing them into this because of perpetual male violence and the female accomplices who benefit from this perpetual cycle of male violence. I personally think the latter rings true.

>Compared to boys
Males are inherently violent and so few if any have an interest in helping babies or animals. Isn't this supposed to be radfem discussion and picrels, not trad discussion?

This thread went full dumpster fire so damn fast.

>>19149
It's because GCs who call themselves radfems for hating trannies are stupid.

>>19149
farmers are so autistic

>>19149
After seeing the fight in this thread I have no doubt we have /lgbt/ tifs on /2X/. I used to think them calling anon cocksuckers and foids, pornoids, etc (kek) was because they were men but it seems like they were just mentally ill girls paying pretend - which again is a female thing to do.

>>19131
It definitely is pretty normie. Think any person that would visit local forums on x topic before, now visits reddit for the same purpose since forums are dead. That goes for women too, hair, nails, makeup, fashion etc. all have super active subreddits.
Everyone talks nowadays about how google results are fucked and how they search a term + reddit to get a decent result, I've seen this type of thing talked about on tiktok by normie zoomers, reddit isn't just a pretend less offensive copycat of 4chan anymore.
#notallsubreddits are normie, of course, but the site itself is.

>>19154
It's almost like you want the women who disagree with you and your dumbass, trans-validating arguments not to be women. Like calling women "tranny" to other them is your last effort at acting right when you're sat here saying/defending someone saying visiting Pinterest is a female behaviour that proves TIFs are really women after all and using Reddit is a male behaviour which proves the opposite.

>>19134
>>19145
So based it hurts.

>>19181
Trans identified women are women, lmao.

>>19189
Yes, women who don't want to be women, disidentified from their shared biological reality. That's why you're adding "trans-identified" before woman - to point out the differences they believe they have from women. Except you're doing it to women who aren't claiming to be anything other than women and it's exposing your ass.

>>19202
It's not exposing anyone. Women and trans identified women have no differences. Having body dysmorphia, internalized misogyny etc. doesn't mean trans identifying women are super different than other women, they just have some issues and since other women also have their own struggles and issues, you can't "alienate" tifs by pointing out their issues.

>>19205
Yes, of course, but the whole point is you're trying to alienate the women who disagree with your silly meme about so-called "female behaviour" by calling them TIFs. It's really stupid.

>>19212
tbh i am 100% the meme was specifically made to inflame the hyper girly, hyper-susceptible-to-female-socialization tifs that do use pinterest, tumblr, ao3 etc. – your anger over it (and the fight itt) are silly kek

personally the tifs i know of aka stalk online have all used the aforementioned sites for years. they've only recently begun to use reddit after it got popular – and even then, they seem to use it sparingly. this is in sharp contrast to the tims i follow. barring the gay ones they were all on reddit/4chan

>>19086
May post a few more pics

Sorry about the shinigami eyes, I had just begun to peak when I took this

>>19402
>your anger over it (and the fight itt) are silly kek
Nta but no, anger over it is because it's belittling and misognistic, you don't get to make the call of whether you consider it silly you know it's not, ratfem. It's reducing women to acceptable behavior and non acceptable behavior.

>they've only recently begun to use reddit after it got popular – and even then, they seem to use it sparingly.
Women aren't a collective monolith. When you judge women based on your preconceived ideas of stereotypical behavior you do a disservice to us all. No one is denying that tumblr Pinterest and fanfiction sites aren't popular with women but calling this female nature is absolutely misognistic and backwards. Calling Reddit anything but a hellhole full of benign low effort interaction and reposted news is wrong. Reddit is not magically gendered for males only but women prefer not being exposed to screeching hatred of women, gore porn, cp, animal abuse and seeing themselves being beaten and degraded so I can imagine they wouldn't congregate to Reddit as much as males who don't have to be exposed to this masochism save for a few odd subreddits for hobbies, news and ones controlled by other women and maybe some mentally ill women may still continue to use it. Reddit is a good example of why women don't congregate and don't use make up a lot of traffic on these websites you've deemed "male". You could be discussing any subject then a random rapeape comments flys by like picrel.

>this is in sharp contrast to the tims i follow. barring the gay ones they were all on reddit/4chan
Why do you follow any? Bizarre. You realize once again that women congregate to places that they will not be harassed and beaten into submission online, this isn't expected "female behavior". There is no such thing as expected and accepted female behavior, we aren't Tradthots and RP males. This isn't the own you think it is. It's punching down against mentally ill women and then punching yourself in the face in the process.(infighting)

>>19430
>ratfem
stopped reading here…won't be reading the rest, have a good day(infighting)

>>19501
Then you are unwilling to see any other point of views over petty GC shit. I understand tearing down troon males but tifs are victims that only come about from female socialization and the trauma of being a woman in a world made by rape ape males. This is a GC thread not radical feminism. You've slung nothing than insults to women and several of the posts here are the exact behavior your criticizing.(trying to continue the infight)

>>19153
>Farmers are autistic
Hold on, let me go check to see if water is still wet

>>19420
I've been going to cons and seeing "free hugs" signs for long enough that I know scrotes don't hug strangers without an ulterior motive (most likely copping a feel.) I don't even like hugging my blood relatives, let alone random men on the street.

>>19430
I know you've already been redtexted, but "Backdoor Sluts 9" is a South Park reference. It's not a real porno. Did you screencap this thinking it was real? Kek

>>19518
I shouldn't have been redtexted as there was decent discussion there between anons and this board is supposed to exist for disagreement in female politics but a mod has it out for me and has shown preferential treatment. This board exists for political discussion; discussion and disagreement is not infighting to the newfag mod even if you disagree. Actual infighting is instigating petty shit and shit flinging without rhyme or reason. If there's genuine discussion and an argument to be had on a topic here it's not infighting.

I didn't know the reference lol but whether it is a real thing or not the point was it's pretty fucked that this can pop up in unrelated subreddits and be made a passing joke, the context and scope was more the problem. There is far far worse shit on Reddit but I don't have the constitution for that shit, others have on the hate thread but I'm not delving that deep. The point is even in the safe mainstream subreddits fucked up rapeape culture spreads, whether the reference in the comment is real or not is irrelevant as the point still stands. Picrel is another example in a mainstream subreddit. I wonder why women wouldn't be interested in Reddit? Surely it's reductive stereotypes that women like glitter and pinterest and not the gore, the child pornography, the rapeape culture, the seething hatred towards women etc.

>>19535
I better not catch a ban for responding to this but you literally took the bait. The person you were "discussing" with really said "I ain't reading all that" and you typed another essay anyway like an autist. This is a screencap thread, go to one of the other threads designed for you to dump your thesis in response to people who don't care

>>19535
>the gore, the child pornography, the rapeape culture, the seething hatred towards women
Kinda makes me wonder what kind of subs you follow.
My experience with Reddit within the last 48 hours
>skim through the news
>get in a slapfight over TES lore
>get in a slapfight over book genres
>stare at science experiments
>check out some vidya subreddits
>have a surprisingly coherent discussion about mythology
>get in a slapfight over the hollywood writers' strike
>followed by a slapfight about artificial intelligence
>find a funny cat vid to send my mum

>>19518
That makes no difference LMAO

>>19548
>"go to another thread to dump your thesis aka 7 sentences against porn no1curr"
>dumps a tumblr screenshot of a rant from the same perspective
God this board is going to shit with the Crystal Cafe mean girl larping(infighting)

pillarsalt on Tumblr ;3(;3)

mods are active af smh frfr no cap rizzy rizzed up staffing(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE, NO CAP FRFR)