File: 1576678938207.jpg (252.79 KB, 1900x2168, PicsArt_12-18-08.19.39.jpg)
File: 1576930460315.png (14.01 KB, 530x90, reddit.png)
Everything is discrimination against menz, even an Iranian women's site reporting deaths.
File: 1576939875541.jpg (360.34 KB, 1080x1444, Screenshot_20191221-085057_Red…)
Of course they don't give a fuck.
Tells you something that they're more upset about the women's deaths being reported in a women's publication than the actual male on male violence that led to the deaths in the first place.
Men killing men, but what do they choose to be upset about? Women reporting the tragedies of women.
They just want all the sympathy and for the women to be invisible. Maybe journalism chooses to report the number of women and children dead in atrocities such as these because, generally speaking
, the women and children aren't being the hostile ones and so it would take a force especially heinous to have killed them. With men there's doubt they weren't doing something to instigate a rebuke.
File: 1577004955057.png (28.89 KB, 1132x294, wtfreddit.PNG)
Saw an r/jokes thread about Billie Eilish turning 18 and the amount of comments that cited her lyrics and went "well but she writes explicit songs so really how can you blame people (*men, they don't say it, but it's men) for counting down till she's 18?"
Gross, how often do men use this excuse for raping children? "Oh but she lied about her age!! she TOTALLY initiated it!!" yeah dude, but if you're an adult it's YOUR responsibility not to reciprocate.
These lyrics are weird as fuck when you take into account her brother wrote them, but also do these scrotes ever consider she's singing about guys her own fucking age and not weird 30=year-old obese reddit shut-ins? She makes music aimed at teens but these scrotes act like she's personally asking to suck them off lmao. It's so weird how men assume everything women do is personally for them.
I lost my shit at a now ex-friend over this the other day when he asked me why I posted a picture with my cleavage out if I didn't want him commenting on it. I asked him if it ever occurred to him I was putting it out there for attractive guys and he blocked me lmao.
The 'might seduce your dad type' line is probably why they assume it's old men.
The lyrics are straight up nasty but I would never blame a child for them, there are way too many people involved in/influencing the writing process and creating her persona in general that I wouldn't assume she was legit into it. And even if she was, it's the adult's responsibility to never act on it or entertain the idea.
She seems distinctly uncomfortable with being sexualized, I'm pretty sure she's explicitly said that's why she wears baggy clothes.
Also forgot to say >I asked him if it ever occurred to him I was putting it out there for attractive guys and he blocked me lmao.
fucking rekt lmao
AITA is an anti-woman sub in general.
Post as a man there and you will get a fair and balanced perspective.
Post as a woman there and people will be looking to poke holes in your narrative to find out how you are, in fact, always the asshole.
And so god help you if it's money-related, you gold digging whores.
the bar is so fucking low that woman are now expected to accept paedophiles. notice how he was clearly never going to tell her and it was his sister that told him?>>245
I've noticed the same, if it's a man telling the story they accept it as truth, if it's a woman there must be important information that she's left out
Pedophillia can’t be cured. The stupid neckbeard defending him are probably pedos themselves.
The scary thing is the “some pedophiles are actually nice people who haven't
molested any kids yet
“ thing that everyone is enabling. Pedophiles should be neutered like dogs and watched heavily by authorities (or better yet euthanized) anyone who disagrees is a pedophile themselves
File: 1577473447958.jpeg (216.35 KB, 640x840, E1E00553-16EC-4C54-A9D9-4DC67A…)
The fucker ADMITTED TO LOOKING AT CHILD PORN, HES AN ACTIVE PEDO WTF!
File: 1577474130310.jpeg (710.9 KB, 2400x2400, 67100BB8-9626-4558-87CA-30BEA8…)
Someone points out that her “one strike rule” is basically her passively allowing him a chance to rape a child and this is the response
A mans bollocks is more important than a child’s entire life, body, sa free ty and security. What does a man really lose when you lop off his nuts or even his dick as well? In fact, pedophillia is so deeply ingrained that even that won’t cure them. They need to either be locked up for life or killed, only then can they not be a “non offending pedo”
I'm not trying to tinfoil but holy shit people predicting that the public will be open and emphasize with actual fucking that get sexual enjoyment from abusing children
are right. This agenda is pure evil. I don't think there will be proper treatment unless it's a brain transplant
>>328>you want to just round up these potential child rapists, castrate them and lock them up for life?
These pedo apologists are so annoying, who cares if you’re “ruining someone’s life” if they have the potential to permanently damage a person and take away an aspect of their childhood. They say they don’t wanna molest kids, fine, take it a step further and chop your testes off, what do you need them for anyways?
I can't wrap my head around the absolute cumbrain of it all. To be such a primal piece of shit that an orgasm overrides a CHILD'S wellbeing, safety, and mental health for the rest of their life.
How in the fuck getting off is so important to these people that they're willing to excuse horrific actions is maddening to me. There's no such thing as a non offending pedophile.
If it’s good enough for our beloved dogs and cats then for sure it’s good enough for the filthiest scum on the planet, whether they have the guts or the opportunity to offend or not. Not only that but spayed/neutered animals are so much calmer and more content, they also live longer and are less likely to get cancer. So what is so bad about it? They act like it’s inconceivable torture, worse than a child being molested. It affects you less than losing a kidney.
The only reason I’m against castrating pedos is because it doesn’t stop them being pedos. It’s far deeper ingrained. It’s not just a primal physical urge, it’s an obsession, a sickness, a disease of the entire mind, even without sexual pleasure or abilities they will still be pedos. You really got to just lock them up, give them menial factory jobs for the rest of their lives, or just kill them. T he very very least is lifetime probation, banned from being married, banned from all public spaces for the rest of their lives. If they don’t like it they can fucking rope.
File: 1577717320884.jpg (40.96 KB, 750x432, cmm992dv8js21.jpg)
It's true, it won't make them stop abusing others since the sickness is in their mind. It's only fair as a punishment though. Misuse you dick and lose it.
File: 1577736258504.jpg (946.73 KB, 1502x2526, downwiththeclown.jpg)
I really hope you're feeling my cool vibes and want to be my friend, fellow gays
We should tbh. We know there's a high chance that they will reoffend so why not use the death penalty when we know beyond any doubt that a pedophile (or any rapist imo) is guilty? I think the only reason we don't is because there's too many pedos in government and law enforcement, but maybe that's for the conspiracy thread.>>466
Not to sound like a tankie, but I wish we could send pedophiles and rapists to a gulag somewhere inhospitable and away from people they could hurt. Send these freaks into the mines or something. Dangerous but unskilled work.
File: 1577916318834.png (72.9 KB, 1103x474, badumtis.PNG)
His sentence implies being fatherless is worse than being black in the 70's lol.>https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/egcaxa/being_male_and_having_no_father_figure_in_life_is/Besides I think some studies have shown these problems are because poor households are more likely to be father less. It's because they're poor not because they have no dad
Well fucking talk about it amongst yourselves then, start shaming other men for being non committal, abandoning their children and shirking responsibility. Start praising and encouraging involved fathers who are exited about parenthood and do 50% of the childcare instead of considering it women's work. But they wont do that, they will just keep blaming and shaming single mothers for not being good enough to keep a man or raise a child, because women are always at fault.
And you're right, it's far more likely to be poverty than the lack of a dad or insufficiency of the mother. Obviously a relationship is more likely to fail when the parents are disadvantaged to begin with, and those disadvantages will be passed on to the child.
I agree with you, the mere thought makes me giddy and id probably gleefully inflict prolonged penis torture on a lot of vicious scrotimals that I know of, but it’s not something that I’d ever expect to happen. We will have to settle for a socialist lifelong gulag-esque dystopia.
It’s a pity that pedos seem to get more protection than victims
of stalkers, because it’s exillerating when these people get their comeuppance, after dedicating their lives to the sexual degradation of innocents.
File: 1577978838359.png (60.83 KB, 1037x289, Capture.PNG)
This sounds like a legit mental illness, but the comments are full of 'you're this random sexuality!' https://www.reddit.com/r/offmychest/comments/78uoua/im_sexually_attracted_to_girls_but_only/
I used to say shit like this back when I was still dealing with a ton of internalized misogyny and 'not like other girls!' syndrome.
File: 1578030757980.png (118.14 KB, 771x914, 51e97f0f487ad5ce859bc03d844e44…)
OP himself isn't bad in this, but holy fuck the comments are cancerous.
"LEAVE HER IMMEDIATELY SHE'S A PSYCHO"
Yet somehow this shit:>>255
is totally acceptable.
Women can be shrill and annoying when they don’t get that way, men straight up go for low blow insults and shout at the top of their lungs; they also constantly flirt with very young women because they know that the poor women has to continue to be polite. They literally stalk and harass women doing their jobs, but yeah “Karen”
There are too many negative Male stereotypes to assign one male name to the behaviour.
Honestly, she's not really wrong, but she should've just had a hidden personal account like a lot of women have.>>683>>684
If you send a moid a nude, you have to assume at least all his friends are going to see it. Showing his dad seems weird and almost incestuous to me though. Why does he want his dad to want to fuck his girlfriend so badly? Degenerate.
Comment >>501262 in the /OT/ reddit thread made me think of Carys Whittaker, a former fitness and current fashion youtuber.
There is an entire subreddit dedicated to her of coomers just going through her fashion hauls and vlogs with her husband to find nip slips and things and talk about jerking off to her.
It's especially gross cause her audience skews young and can easily find this subreddit that contains even edits of her face onto porn bodies and men talking about cumming by simply googling her name.https://www.reddit.com/r/Busybeecarys/
>>796>One of these fuckers used Vaush to convince his wife
I seriously wonder how many of these women just sigh and go along with things so their husband doesn't constantly sperg at them.
Also kek at "I have to tell her I think women are people" since that's such a basic take. They don't realize how much little shit wears away at that conception of humanity. They think that by not going full Handmaiden's Tale with it that they're looking out for women while still projecting coomer mindsets and worse.
Being married to someone like that is so crazy to me. I guess things don't come up too often so there's not a huge conflict but I don't know how they don't reconsider things or feel terrible once they realize their husband doesn't think women go through some shit.
File: 1578302537743.jpg (131.15 KB, 720x897, ykqo6h8fpc541.jpg)
tbf both IRL and online I have more commonly seen the seen reverse of this situation, hyper woke libfem feminist women dating bland vanilla men who are more or less indifferent to thier wives/girlfriends activism but don't ever argue with them, don't comment on politics just keeping quiet, smiling and nodding and doing the bare minimum
I also don't really get how the hell men can be okay in relationships like that but then I guess they're happy as long as they're laid.
As for the flipside I'm pretty sure reddit bro dick is nowhere near worth being shit on. I'm glad it's rare but it's still baffling.
File: 1578522829097.png (81.68 KB, 885x266, Screen Shot 2020-01-08 at 5.34…)
Another gem from there. How dumb can you be?
File: 1578526582413.jpg (144.28 KB, 694x900, ENx-si4W4AEQEx3.jpg)
this whole thread is blaming women for men taking 0 responsibility for their choices in life. There literally a gilded post saying that the reason the UK has so many single moms is that it's "easier to be a single mom than work" and they "substitute a father with the state."
Men need to ask themselves why they're so easily substituted, apparently.
He pulled this entire argument out of his ass. The idea that the petty concept of social popularity is why women didn't want to go into STEM more in the past is peak delusion, and as >>1290
explains, STEM always had prestige. It's also an incredibly wide, diverse, and practical group of fields that goes far beyond being a "computer nerd." He calls out "massive ignorance of social history" but doesn't even seem to understand that STEM goes back for ages, it means teams of scientists working in labs with limited dependence on and before the introduction of computers, it means field engineers who do manual labor at male-dominated and remote sites, academia, medicine, and a lot more. He's basing his whole concept of the progression and historical gender imbalance of the field on his very recent little bubble of web-based employment and experiences growing up feeling weird for being a "nerd" paired with his total obliviousness to any of the experiences of the women around and before him.
thats right ladies, according to reddit you now have to accept and ignore it if your boyfriend looks at loli and borderline underage porn. there are even people in the comments saying that the boyfriend should be uncomfortable not her kek
why is everyone on this website so degenerate and out of touch with realityhttps://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/em3hbg/boyfriend_21m_watches_pornography_that_makes_me/
File: 1578612940491.jpg (74.03 KB, 640x853, reddit.jpg)
I'm sorry for shitposting but I know there are some Finnish anons here and I really want to share this. I found a troon that looks exactly like Juha Sipilä.
File: 1578689124471.jpg (242.82 KB, 2031x2031, 46c33ce.jpg)
Just fucking gross
>>1450>get free drinks uwu>reject all the boys>flash boobs at everyone
so men fantasize about doing stupid stupid shit they accuse women of doing.
I feel awful for his wife, if he's not lying
>>1450>wash my vag thoroughly
He'd have a nice yeast infection or BV the whole time anyway.
File: 1578780711398.jpg (735.14 KB, 1080x1544, Screenshot_20200111-161157_Red…)
I see. Men are in general less aesthetically pleasing than women to me, too, but I still find them hot regardless.
But if your attraction is more personality-first then that explains it.
And getting a dick is probably about as uncomfortable as suddenly having boobs. It would definitely be weird/take some getting used to.
Almost definitely. If men put effort the same into shaving, fashion, and hair and skin care that women do they'd probably look better on average.
They'd still be top heavy and roughly angular compared to many women, but they'd be closer to "pretty."
i think so. i don't see women as sexy, just more normal looking, but i think society has conditioned even women, into thinking they're overall sexy. i think this is maybe the reason why they say women are bi, not because they really are, but because they've internalized the male gaze so hard.>>1546
i dont find either sex sexually attractive, personally, but men are truly strange looking. facially they can be cute, but the rest is a turn off, especially their legs. they shouldn't even have legs. theyre just so bizarre.
It's the same thing >girl on reddit expresses feeling bad about herself because she's comparing herself to her bfs porn since that's what he likes and is jerking off to it>reddit tells her porn has nothing to do with her and it's her insecurity and self esteem issues that's the problem
Then go look through anti porn/porn free subs. men flat out admit that their porn caused them to see their gfs/wives as unattractive compared to porn. Yet cumbrains can't connect the two dots or read the literature behind porn addiction ruining their brains and dicks
File: 1578791563286.png (154.89 KB, 1092x753, 355365636.PNG)
CMV is full of cringy 'let's debate' redditors using it as their soap box, but the comments are always fun because they gtfo the Op's most of the time. >https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/eijvn5/cmv_i_find_it_impossible_to_support_feminism_as_a/
File: 1578791694907.png (40.77 KB, 1084x267, 24554245.PNG)
Dude trust me
File: 1578836416716.png (75.94 KB, 1098x515, 35345.PNG)
sorry for same fagging, but why name your movement after a gay perfume?
It's definitely a thing. They watch it because they want to see some sex but feel bad when they see a woman because of the misogyny she is experiencing on screen or that she could have been coerced into doing it. There's also how straight porn is gross or triggering
, while lesbian porn is made for straight men and nothing like what lesbians actually do (they stick every random object in their vaginas in lesbian porn). I think the joke that lesbians watch gay male porn was even in some movies directed by lesbians.
File: 1578985159048.jpeg (183.59 KB, 640x512, 870A1F58-6097-4C14-B427-C790E9…)
Reddit is where memes go to die
File: 1579125700948.jpg (100.06 KB, 620x1024, 45737547.jpg)
I'm not one for 'you're going to regret it', but the way reddit treats vasectomies they are going to regret it.
The men getting this don't care. It reduces their liability in sleeping around. Especially if they would be deadbeats and abandon the woman and baby anyway. Sperm can be frozen and vasectomies are easier reversed. If anything their gfs/wives might come to regret it if they change minds and want kids later.
I actually like it when men volunteer this information. They tend to be douche canoes who don't want responsibility which translates to overall lack of ambition in every aspect of their life. It's different when a woman says she doesn't want children because let's face it, pregnancy is risky and we'd get stuck will all the work of raising a child. When a man says he doesn't want children, he's saying he doesn't want to have to step up. Likely the same kind of man who would blow off his obligations if they became inconvenient, or divorce you if you developed a chronic illness that required care from your spouse.
I cheer that these men won't reproduce. And in theory, they're doing the right thing by not propagating their genes.
File: 1580243959886.jpg (119.02 KB, 1242x1122, kvltx8rv35d41.jpg)
muslim men are the worst possible garbage known to my imagination.
I genuinely feel happy when i hear some of them dying, Religion itself is a cult but the men into them are horrid and deserve to die.(Race-baiting)
File: 1580406392033.png (70.91 KB, 915x740, oh no no no.PNG)
One of reddit's most liberal subreddit shuts down 'men are trash' with the most basic bitch MGTOW tier arguments.>I'm nonbinary. Can I say women are trash since people with binary privilege oppress me? Just wonderin'>This is some borderline personality shit.>(men are trash) can also be indistinguishable from - and lead to - actual misandry (as opposed to just a transitory generalized release of anger)
They both kinda sound like dumbfucks tbh.
Clearly the men commenting are just pissed that a woman would rather carry someone else's child to help out their situation than carry and birth their genes. The comments are just a manifestation of their primal outrage at that level of rejection lol.
But the woman in this story just doesn't make sense either.
If she's never been pregnant before then how would she qualify for surrogacy? Sounds like a shady dealing to start with, possibly cheating?
If there's money involved, I can't imagine it being all that worth it in the grand scheme considering a bad pregnancy can mean nine months of suffering, permanent bodily harm, or in the worst case–death.
Also pregnancy hormones do batshit things to the brain insofar as bonding. She should realize there may be lifelong mental problems if she experiences depression or anxiety post partum. For someone who doesn't want kids, it's fucked that she's being so nonchalant about the negative outcomes here.
It almost reads like fiction writing because the scenario doesn't make sense.
Sounds to me like they simply don't have a lot of money, and know they don't, but the husband is insistent on having kids, and being a surrogate also gets a lot of money which is why it may seem like a better option
Men are so selfish and fixated on their crotch goblins they don't care about the money situation, if they even want to stay, the woman's physical and mental health, etc