File: 1713533795384.gif (982.02 KB, 256x256, IMG_0054.gif)
No. 75576
File: 1713565527147.jpg (293.07 KB, 968x759, 1000002775.jpg)
it really feels like you can get banned for anything. posting a meme in a relevant thread? ban. being a little silly? ban. pointing out how dissolving the dumbass shit thread has lowered the quality of posting site-wide because there is no longer a containment thread for dumbassery? b-
No. 75581
>>75579>these supposed oldfags act like this isn't the case even for the more mundane postt. confirmed newfag
>>75578nta but it was fucking bulbapedia. imagine someone links to a wikipedia article and gets banned for not taking a screenshot of it first, because that's exactly what happened to that anon. it was a retarded ban, simple as. did someone tell you you'd get offered mod privs one day if you bootlick hard enough?
we screencap things that cows can delete. not the sex ratios of over 1000 pokemon on the biggest pokemon wiki there is. this is insane.
No. 75582
>>75581Second ayrt, like I literally said in my post, sometimes farmhands do give out unreasonable imageboard bans and I agree that the Bulbapedia one was one of them. That anons post was not solely about that specific incident, it was giving a (bad) suggestion.
>imagine someone links to a wikipedia article and gets banned for not taking a screenshot of it firstThis just depends on the post. I feel like this is common sense, but you don't have to screenshot an entire page. If there's a specific part that's relevant to the post, then yeah it should be screenshotted. Afaik for the Bulbapedia post, anon wasn't referencing a specific thing that was said in the article but something she just observed from reading.
>did someone tell you you'd get offered mod privs one day if you bootlick hard enough?I probably criticize and complain about the admin and jannies in /meta/ more than the average anon, but sure lol.
No. 75583
some vendettafag is trying to remake a thread that was locked months ago
>>>/snow/1987088old, locked thread
>>>/snow/1954761 No. 75586
>>75584I don't think that you guys get that this site isn't meant to coddle you or spoon-feed everything to you. You either learn how to do certain things as a part of integrating, or you don't and get banned.
Also, "this is an imageboard" bans probably aren't that long. Likely no more than a few hours. You guys need to stop taking short bans personal rather than just a correction.
No. 75590
>>75588Im not complaining. Anon(s) can post, I just think it's a bad suggestion.
>has been whiteknighting the mods for several days Wtf are you talking about kek. The past few hours have been the first time I commented on this and I said in two different posts (>>75582
>>75578) that they sometimes give out wrong bans, including the bulbapedia one. The OP was not even specifically about the Bulbapedia post. This board really is schizo central.
No. 75608
>>75597Yes… they’re external websites, and you embed the images they host on this imageboard. They’d just extend this functionality to embed other websites. Nice try.
>>75602They couldn’t even figure out a way to archive chats. It is for this reason I believe we don’t have a troon admin team.
No. 75614
>>75611Embedding images from a link doesn't even make sense. The whole point on posting caps is to specifically screenshot want you want to show (plus archiving for cows) other anons. How will the site know specifically which part of the website to screenshot and then embed onto the post?
Again, every other year before this no one had a problem posting caps. I don't get why it's suddenly an issue now. It's like you guys are spinning a wheel to find things to complain about.
No. 75615
>>75613Idk the same way anyone capping a link probably just caps the first page they link to? Plus embedding wouldn’t take away the ability to screenshot a specific area of the screen and upload it. It would just make it easier. And from a user perspective it’s like staff are finding things to ban people for when they could be automated. It makes sense when it’s a snapchat that a cow could delete, not so much when it’s a Wikipedia link that’s not going anywhere.
>>75612You said “this is an imageboard” and I asked what other imageboards stipulate this as a rule. Apparently none do so it being an IB clearly has nothing to do with it.
No. 75619
File: 1713591751402.png (310.25 KB, 734x742, 1000024453.png)
Never saw a ban page so no idea if my ban is over or what. Not using vpn or mobile data either. I posted media and an opinion (picrel and
>>>/w/325219). It's not nitpicking to say a dog actively trying to remove a tight hat doesn't look comfortable. And pretty low blow too with your toady or sockpuppet talking about how "if you had ever had a dog, you'd know they actually love having tight elastic hats shoved on their heads" Yeah fuck you, one of my most recent long posts was about grieving my dead dog. I've posted many times about my dog from this location/ip, which is where I cared for her during her final months. I don't go into that thread to ree about dogs, unlike the dog sperg, who usually never gets banned. So I find it suspicious how targeted the red text and retarded replies were. Save your mockery and calling me crazy, I don't care and it's not the first time an anon has had suspicions like I'm having. I brought it to /meta/ and I'm done now.
Meanwhile we have wks in the thread gushing over how Taylor is too pretty and too perfectly shaped to wear some designer's clothes:
>>>/w/325231 Can the mods actually mod instead of banning everything that doesn't fawn over the cow? She chose the designer and liked what she wore (I also liked it fwiw), why is it not "nitpicking" to shit all over the designer then?
No. 75623
>>75619I always try to be supportive of our mod team but yeah, that /w farmhand is really weird and Cerbmin should investigate them a little bit (and take a look at the obsessed WKs post history too)
There's one or two anons abusing the report system, marking every post as nitpicking and then they come cry here in /meta (the only reason I know about them since I don't read that thread) and the farmhand just goes along with it.
The way they're caping for her ugly scrotoid is especially weird to me.
Like, imagine the same redtexts anywhere else on the site :
> Noooo! You can't make fun of a cow's boyfriend ! You're so mean and this is not ok ! Lurch is not that ugly and he doesn't look like a corpse!!1 No. 75624
File: 1713608312269.png (7.83 KB, 570x111, image.png)
This anon should have said where she got this from, but is there really no place for rumors here anymore? There's been countless instances over the years where someone claiming to know a cow came here to leak info without screenshots or share private information that turned out to be true. If every update requires a screenshot regardless of whether that's even feasible then people will stop coming here to share dirt on cows they know and the only type of new content will be whatever the cows post on social media.
No. 75627
>>75619tl;dr
where are all you entitled newfags coming from? sucks to be your dog but that doesn't mean this wasn't sperging. Animal sperging derails things quickly, that's why they ban it.
No. 75629
>>75625I made the thread and I'm not sure either why I was banned (it has now expired, so whatever. I didn't even notice until today lol). I don't remember there being a rule forbidding creating new threads until X number of posts are left in the old one or something, so who knows. Do enlighten me if there
is such a rule.
>wks thought the old one was finished and started shitting up the nextMay be this is why?
No. 75631
>>75630just report them for derailing if it's not relevant to the thread.
jfc i can't believe we're circling back to the 00s where you had to warn "boy x boy content!!1!" or else people would throw a fit.
this is an imageboard for weeb women, of course there's going to bhe fujos. why should hetero shippers get precendence?
No. 75638
>>75623Isn't
>>75619 the one being in meta?
No. 75675
is it just me or is the strike witches spammer
>>>/ot/1966995>>>/ot/1968317>>>/ot/1973013>>>/ot/1973024acting very similar to rancefag
No. 75683
>>75679>would you be like UMMMM POST PROOFyes. I was one of the anons shitting on the retard who banned that person in the /m/ pokemon thread earlier but this is a situation where that rule is actually supposed to be enforced. gossip site =/= shit up threads with your baseless rumors.
>>75681>if someone just said this to you verballythen no one gives a fuck or has any reason to believe you, end of story.
No. 75689
File: 1713676597270.jpg (2.07 MB, 2685x2012, worldsshittiestcapcollage.jpg)
Can farmhands tard wrangle the Fujocoomer and Fujo vs Antis discourse threads?
There's been an anon claiming to be a lesbian into loli anime, posting racist shit. overall just being an obnoxious personalityfag. Both fujos and antis are flinging shit trying to pin the blame on each other for making them look bad.
No. 75693
>>75691Well, it's a little hard to follow, but she derailed the fuck out of the lesbian thread for days to attention whore and sperg about fujos. She tried to get women to add her on Discord here
>>>/g/363983 and the Vocaroo was here
>>>/g/364094. She also recommended some oneeloli
>>>/g/364750 and then backtracked
>>>/g/364756. People also got upset because she posted a sexual fantasy about "curing a fujo's bisexuality."
>>>/g/363960. There are enough coincidences to make me think this is her, but maybe it's not.
No. 75699
>>75690We don't know if it's the same person. It could be a coincidence, or it could be an elaborate troll who pretends to be her.
I'm still in the camp that the hand poster was a fujo.
No. 75709
>>75623agreed.
>>75627Well, I wasn't banned for "sperging" and also I didn't sperg, I just said I thought the previous Rosie birthdays were better.
>>75643You have no idea who bumps it, pretty sure the WK(s) do so it gets attention from their fav mod. The last time I mentioned a problem with that thread getting bumped,some bootlicker in here insisted it's people testing their bans and that this is a normal thing to do. It's not normal.
No. 75726
>>75714According to the farmhand that banned the baiting fujos in the cringe thread it's like 3 people
>>>/ot/1973705 That was tones of posts, so I assume it's the same for their contributions to the discourse thread. Some anon said they have won a war
>>>/ot/1973502 so I assume a few retards think spamming as many posts as possible = winning some made up fight. Shippingfags are insane.
>>75723The fujos were the ones banned for baiting the cringe thread anon…
No. 75729
>>75728>twisting my words this hardYou and others like you are retarded cows. You're effectively being trolled
because you are retarded cows. You will continue to be trolled until they get bored of you. Best you get back to it now instead of wasting your time trying to spin the narrative to people who don't like either of you. Maybe if you guys can prove to them just how deep your retardation reserves run they'll get bored a little faster.
No. 75739
File: 1713770716842.png (38.43 KB, 727x229, 1000024590.png)
MtF thread:
>>>/snow/1987653 (not my ban)
Seriously? We can no longer use any black humor about TiMs abusing children? Men will abuse anything that moves. wtf how is this "tinfoiling," this nona didn't even specify which stunning brave troon she meant.
No. 75746
>>75736That's not what cowtipping means. Cowtipping is directly interacting with the cow themselves, which in this case would be Scott. Letting
victims know that there's a place they can come to share the experiences they had with a cow in the past isn't tipping, and has been done since the beginning of this site. It was even done in Lori's early threads, with Soni, Scott and others being told about it and they came to spill milk.
>>75743>>75745You are way too passionate about begging for this thread not to be made. To suspicious levels. If the thread ends up shitty, mods will deal with it. But let it be made and see what happens.
No. 75774
>>75763I agree with all of this.
>Fandom threads never should've been left in ot and moved to m.Remember when the kpop critical threads were on m? Why is anime fandom discussion different?
No. 75776
File: 1713824405384.gif (267.03 KB, 220x217, IMG_0018.gif)
>>75768It’s because one of the mods created those bait threads in the first place. Think smarter not harder
nonnie No. 75806
>>75804The Lori/Scott stuff is old milk and anons can go through old threads to read about it. Other than trying to have something to talk about because anon said the thread is slow, it's not new content and we don't need anons just talking about it again for funsies. I don't think anons understand how threads work anymore at all. A slow thread is a fine thread. Not every cow has longevity when it comes to milk. She's just a normal e-thot who's aging at this point. The most milk she has anymore is complaining about hating her outfits and faces she makes in facetune, blocking/unblocking of Kevin, and that's about it. There's tons of threads that are stagnant because the cows aren't interesting anymore even if they are interesting to a few people. If there is nothing to post about who cares, but trying to force discussion and then having to expand it because you
need milk is pretty sad. Not to mention the anon who said they have contacted the cows that would be called calves.
No. 75812
>>75811There is a tinfoil thread. And interesting, any mention of zionism is pol tier now?
Anyway, i want a farmhand to respond, so i know for sure.
No. 75817
>>75814basically nothing is allowed anymore. And you're replying to someone who is anti-everything.
I wouldn't agree with your conspiracy stuff but idk why that's forbidden if it's confined to a thread. And for what it's worth, even some very mild things have been marked as racebait, including any mention of Islam as a misogynistic religion.
No. 75820
>>75819I said if it is confined to a thread, meaning the conspiracies thread. Was anon saying posts about Zionism were being banned from that thread? I thought that was the implication.
I don't support it taking over other threads. I don't enjoy reading it, but if it's in one specific thread I can just scroll past.
No. 75827
File: 1713898818252.jpeg (542.07 KB, 734x1225, IMG_2107.jpeg)
>>75826Kek was this you? Banned deserved. Please go be schizophrenic elsewhere
No. 75832
>>75828The history of it goes:
>artist general created in /ot/, in practice it's a way to complain about fandom discourse >fujos start reclaiming their name (from 2009 to 2022 calling yourself a fujoshi online was cringe) and making memes about it, awareness of fujos grows>meanwhile, artist general is a toilet of fandom discourse, fandom discourse thread gets made>artist thread is now peaceful and has been ever since>fandom thread is normal for a while until the awareness of fujos reaches critical mass, and it gets taken over by fujo vs antifujo sperging>No thread allows anons to discuss with each other on this topic, attempts at a fujo coomer cringe and anti-fujo cringe threads prove unsuccessful, what anons really want to do is argue with each other as is the nature of jobless imageboard users >Fujo vs antifujo thread created >fandom discourse thread suddenly peaceful, history repeating itself.The containment has proven effective. Despite what it seems, there's actually not that many bans in it. If you remove this containment, it will go back to fandom discourse and spill over to the rest of the site again. Mods are going to have to ax fandom discourse for being a hive of infighting, meaning the discussion will go back to artist general. Rinse and repeat.
It's impossible to ban fujo content on this website as half of the /m/ threads would have to go. Conversely, it's impossible to ban antifujo sperging because the FTM thread would have to go, too. In an ideal world we wouldn't need containment threads but sadly we need them and most of all they work.
No. 75837
>>75835>The fujo threads in /m/ existed long before the artist salt threads in /ot/pretty sure this is just straight up untrue, but maybe I'm remembering wrong. both threads weren't always the generals we know them as now before /m/ was a thing.
but also the fujos who've been on /m/ for years aren't the same fujos in the /ot/ threads. the autistic ones from /ot/ stand out immediately in /m/ because they start acting the same way they do on /ot/ and act like
victims of cruel boolying when the /m/ regulars say they're annoying and should kts.
No. 75842
>>75838right, and that's how /ot/ has been as a whole since the unpopular opinions thread came about. it's neither fujos nor antifujos who are the problem, it's the board culture of /ot/. infighting has gotten out of control, /ot/s userbase encourages it, and the mods are incompetent in dealing with it. infighters become obsessed with their topics and attempt to spread their beliefs in unrelated threads at every turn, whether they're doing it subconsciously out of autism or because they're trying to get more people on "their side" or a mix of the two. but banning the topics they fight about outright has never worked because those anons are here to fight, and they will find a new thing to fight over within a day. this isn't a problem on any other board, and when someone tries to make it one they get dogpiled and chased right back to /ot/. this all reminds me of what happened on 4chan with /pol/.
>>75840>RFH is a mod heresince when? post pics
No. 75844
>>75839Having a line break between every one or two sentences
or god forbid two line breaks
looks fucking retarded and wastes space. While it could improve walls of text that are several hundred words or more, it's fine if two or three paragraphs are combined into one.
No. 75846
>>75839Reddit spacing is when you put spaces between small amounts of text that don't need to be broken up for readability.
Like this.
If you're writing a really long post, adding some space is fine.
But there's no reason a post with five sentences needs three breaks. It's not a poem.
No. 75848
>>75835Nice try, no they did not.
>>75837 is right, artist salt general has existed since 2017 while the fujo thread in /m/ was created in 2022. I know not every fujo jumped on the bandwagon of not calling themselves expressly "fujoshi" during this period but let's be real, the ones that still called themselves by that name proudly and openly were a mocked minority. The original audience of this, the artist general, is of course made out of half-twitterfags because 99% of online artists have to be active in woke ass tumblr/twitter circles to get their art seen. That's why I said fujos
reclaimed their name and got it to be accepted in mainstream internet culture again.
The first fujo thread even has a definition of what fujoshi means, exactly because it was "new" for the zillennials on social media who were shitting their diapers in the 2000s. Nowadays even moids know what a fujoshi is which really was NOT the case in the decade before. I've been on LC before any of the offtopic boards even existed and fujo or anti-fujo were really not topics that even grazed this website.
No. 75855
>>75853but the infight fest on /ot/ isn't that at all. we need to stop having threads that both condone and criticize the same topic, it's not how threads work on here, and
that is what's newfaggy. imagine if the dog love and dog hate threads were the same one, it makes no sense. i know the site is kind of slow but if one topic creates another they need to be separate.
No. 75858
>>75855>imagine if the dog love and dog hate threads were the same one, it makes no senseThe difference is that dog haters and dog lovers don't want to interact with each other. Fujos and antifujos desperately want to argue and shit up the entire website looking for their opponent if they're not contained. Do you want to go back to before the containment thread was created? At least now there's a place to direct them to so they can make hatelove in peace.
>i know the site is kind of slow but if one topic creates another they need to be separateThey were separate before and as a result the fandom, fujo and FTM threads were absolutely fucking obnoxious. And it's not like we all love each other and live in harmony discussing cows in this website, anons have been fighting about a cow's nasolabial folds and 22 inch waist since LC's inception. Despite some recent moderation trends, farmers have never been passive consumers of milk shaking hands with each other that the cow is BPD fat and cringe.
No. 75861
>>75853Ayrt and kek, I forgot about this completely even though I just found some of my posts in there from 8 years ago. Forgive me nonna.
That said, it says a lot that that thread lasted for 5 years before filling up. There's definitely been a resurgence in popularity when it comes to the awareness of the term "fujoshi" ever since 2022. The thread has more posters and goes much faster now. As a sad collateral, xitter Discourse about fujos exists now too.
No. 75866
File: 1713952415916.jpg (68.88 KB, 640x463, 1652416529225.jpg)
>>75862I think it all went downhill with the Genshin thread in /m/. It attracted a certain type of infighting zoomer, newfags who arrived here from twitter and tiktok. Always saw fighting there will scrolling down /m/. While browsing LC on my phone a "related searches to lolcow.farm" popped up. The first was "lolcow genshin". Sigh.
No. 75867
>>75866nta but i wonder if it's because zoomers don't have an outlet for being mean? they have to virtue signal constantly online and irl and they can only criticize others for morally "
valid" reasons. if they go anon they can chimp out without any consequences so they just vent their bs here and fight with everyone.
No. 75871
>>75863>this behavior shouldn't be encouraged. having a single infighting shitshow instead of just two on-topic threads where infighting is moderated goes against the entire landscape of the siteWhat landscape? It's /ot/, the offtopic board. Containment threads (and boards) are a concept inherent to all imageboards and while it would be awesome not to need them, we do and they keep the rest of the site clean. Don't forget that lolcow was created because PT and cow discussion was banned from /cgl/. Go to /cgl/ now and take a look at the catalogue. From one of the most active 4chan boards to a fucking wasteland, being slowly colonized by coomers.
A lot of current farmers are involved in internet culture in general otherwise they wouldn't even be here. Fujoshi and yumejoshi shit are part of internet culture, and that's why this website counts multiple threads dedicated to anime husbandos. You cannot ask farmhands to ban discussion of fujo and anti-fujo ideological talking points while allowing things that clearly fall under that very broad scope, like the FTM general, to continue existing. This would only make the sperging go back to the original threads they came from, see historical timeline
>>75832. If you ask for effective moderation, you'll need to ask for the whole ban hammer to come down on anything that is fujoshi or anifujoshi/yaoiboyTIF-critical. And let's be real, while certain threads move much faster now the entire website is considerably more empty than it was in 2016.
No. 75875
>>75871what are you even talking about? it's as if you didn't comprehend my post. by landscape i meant the state of the site, as i said, incorrectly, but overly moderated in the wrong areas. and my entire point is that
COMBINING the threads should not be allowed because it directly promotes infighting rather than infighting being a secondary occurrence in their own respective threads that could be banned as derailing. we should not be doing anything to directly promote or condone infighting.
No. 75887
>>75875First of all, define infighting. Disagreeing with other anons on yaoi and having a discussion about it is not infighting. Like our own farmhands like to say, women are not a monolith. An anon disagreeing with you and stating their opinion is not infighting. By your own metrics, we would be infighting right now.
And believe it or not, bans for infighting do still happen inside the discourse thread. For a questionable (and honestly unfounded) example, see
>>75576. All this goes to show that thread is being actively moderated and the infighting rules apply, even if strangely enforced. You're acting like the thread is a special exception to infighting when that's not the case. There are farmhands who are still moderating it and banning what they consider infighting.
No. 75903
>>75895Here's your anti-fujo cringe containment thread (originally on /ot/)
>>>/snow/1966263Here's your fujo cringe containment thread
>>>/ot/1959358 No. 75928
Can a mod go into this thread and tell the users they need to be posting caps with the cows names and stuff? We can't verify anything is true or even from the cows themselves because anons are talking to the users directly for info.
How are we supposed to believe anything being posted isn't from anons pretending to be the cows when they are going out of their way to hide who is sending messages? The girlfriends are cows too, stop protecting them if you're ging to be posting about them. We don't need a whole thread full of selfposting, cowtipping retards.
>>>/w/325436 This is exactly why users were saying don't make a Scott thread. Nothing seems legit.
No. 75932
File: 1713978549142.png (67.74 KB, 702x270, ot - Unpopular Opinions #124.p…)
Not my post. Farmhands, the OP did mention other races. While I’m glad to see more of a crackdown on racebait, this is an embarrassingly retarded ban
No. 75936
>>75932The OP that started the discussion mentioned Americans and American isn't a race. She then said
>Asian/Black/Whatever? which includes all races. Her post was not targeted and any one race in particular.
No. 75941
>>75918True. Ot was at it's best when pinkpill, gc, etc. threads were in ot honestly. It worked as a great filter for newfags. You don't even have to agree with it or post, just not seethe in the thread of a controversial topic, showing they could follow the rules and allow other anons to express their true thoughts. The lack of new anons ability to do this at least 90% of the time is why certain boards have sunk in quality.
>>75858I think only a couple want to interact with each other, like the ones who spam each others containment threads.
>>75897Based. They even have their own imageboard already yet can't stand not everyone being 100% uncritical of their thing.
>>75912We need more normies who don't come here after being ousted from reddit, tumblr, or twitter.
No. 75942
>>75876i agree with the rest of this post but
>like a kuromi anon writing a TikTok caption on the vent thread (someone literally asked her if she made a tiktok with the same thing she wrote)it was never confirmed if she was the tiktok poster. seemed like another case of poor detectivefagging imo like when some anon in another thread thought zhang yong was actually self posting a years old meme on here kek
No. 75943
>>75897>t. was not here when kpop got bannedJust so you know, back then twitter behavior wasn't the norm. On modern day lolcow, it is, and that's not just a fujo problem. Whine about it all you like, it's not going anywhere. If it did, that ban would entail all the anti threads going down with it and calling a tif a fujo in that thread resulting in a 3 day ban, you cannot have your cake and eat it to. Kpop was banned because of the kpop CRITICAL thread, not the normal kpop threads. The situation isn't comparable and to insist it is is to announce to us that you're a newfag. Go sperg about muh pinkpill on /2x/, you have a whole board and you're mad you can't have a scrote magnet on
tw/ot/ter? Kek
No. 75953
File: 1714040067209.png (3.02 KB, 413x80, stop making shit up faggot.png)
>>75897no one said hetters in those threads. Where did you get that from? why do you guys need to make shit up, this is why no one likes you.
No. 75954
File: 1714047171432.jpg (168.33 KB, 945x468, Screenshot_20240425_071124_Sam…)
This wasn't a fucking "infight" you retarded ass mods this is what plenty of people would call a joke. Did the retarded mod think I was infighting with fucking Tony Evers himself?
No. 75961
File: 1714059349798.jpeg (107.56 KB, 1280x1137, pouter.jpeg)
>>75959>anyone that uses AI is a moidThat's enough LC for today
No. 75975
>>75972There already is and every time they breach containment normal anons hate it. There's no fucking reason Stupid Questions or Unpopular Opinions or any other thread should have that fucking slop as a threadpic.
It's not fucking hard to find a new picture of a cow or nun jesus fucking christ.
No. 75978
>>75972there is a containment thread already but some aifags insist on posting that shit out of containment then get pissy when peoole don't like their slop
also there's 0 reason to have that shit as a threadpic
No. 75980
File: 1714088903684.jpeg (715.05 KB, 828x1499, IMG_3587.jpeg)
AI crap is all over /ot/ now
mods please ban it or at least make a rule against using it in threadpics
No. 75981
File: 1714090684740.jpg (157.15 KB, 1280x1280, Computer-Geek-Rubber-Duck-Scha…)
>>75980seeing the ai duck made me so upset
:( No. 75986
>>75985Shaming leads to an
(infighting) redtext these days.
No. 75992
File: 1714141252545.png (459.51 KB, 717x1054, satan.png)
cerbmin! farmhands! permaban this devil and save our souls from the blight of ai threadpics once and for all
No. 75996
File: 1714147492455.jpeg (409.95 KB, 821x821, IMG_3590.jpeg)
mfw i gotta see this (unsaged) bullshit in the mtf thread with my own two eyes. /ot/ tradtards have found their way to the cow threads rip
No. 75997
File: 1714148947692.jpeg (381.76 KB, 716x855, IMG_2212.jpeg)
Denying baseless accusations isn’t allowed? Why is only the response banned for infighting? I hate this culture that farmhands enable where anons can project whatever they want onto you, accuse you of being a different anon, holding certain opinions that are never stated, etc and we’re not allowed to call out their retardation. Fuck off
No. 76006
File: 1714161364371.jpeg (110.24 KB, 699x221, IMG_3591.jpeg)
>>76005quit sucking your own dick, ai tard
No. 76014
>>75997That's still infighting, don't whiteknight yourself as if you didn't do anything wrong. Maybe you need to go back to Twitter.
>>75987Then the malicious accusation doesn't apply to you.
>>76012You're going to find a lot of banned VPN IPs one websites like 4chan, lolcow, CC.. Other imageboards.
No. 76024
>>76023No one wants to listen to possible made up stories they have to take with a grain of salt. Cow threads thrive on proof and milk that comes with it. This isn't an anecdotal website unless there's some kind of papertrail.
Why is this cow's thread trying to make uncapped posts canon? This is why anons warned about people reaching to people and telling them to come to lolcow to post. Anons warned about this lol And now you're mad you're being held accountable for it.
No. 76026
File: 1714221111245.png (57.49 KB, 1738x218, image_2024-04-27_222945316.png)
Not my ban and I thought this person was stupid but really? I mean the link says what the entire news story is, I don't think anon needed to screen cap and post bleeding injuries
No. 76027
File: 1714221632944.png (232.61 KB, 1792x412, Screenshot 202.png)
Not my post but jannies this is so dumb. It's not even being used as a thread pic, and the anon isn't avatarfagging or derailing to spam AI shit. It's just a reaction pic or random image. If some people start shitting up /meta/ demanding all images of, idk, anime characters be spoilered or put in a containment thread because "anime is pedophilic, unethical, ugly and spammy af", will you listen too?
No. 76032
>>76027don't be disingenuous. that anon was infighting. and a lot of anons are asking for an ai moratorium, especially since it's being used to bait.
topics that shit up the boards get banned, this isn't new. (cf. kpop)
>>76030agreed. I hope all ai slop outside of dedicated threads is banned for good
No. 76033
File: 1714228232896.jpeg (105 KB, 640x622, 1702197028167.jpeg)
>>76027God bless that farmhand. We have enough AIslop on the internet, we really don't need it here- go to Facebook and 4chan if you absolutely
must post your awful images and not using it to start fights for your own dull amusement.
No. 76037
>>76030>>76033It's actually far more normiebrained to get
triggered over random 3D pictures, I wish underage twitterfags would leave. It's pointless censorship when there are unironic trannies spamming this place with scat and it gets left up for an hour or more.
No. 76040
>>76037>wuh wuh everyone whobdisagrees with me is a twitterfagif you absolutely must post that shit ti satisfy hour autism, just put it in a containment thread, it's not that hard
>>76038ai shit looks creepy and relies on art theft. many ppl don't like to see it, that's why there's containment.
No. 76042
>>76040Notice how you didn't deny it. Go back already. I'm tired of performative retards reeeing over nothing, you have the rest of the internet for that.
>art theftHope you ask artist's permission before you post any picture here. This isn't the fucking Louvre, it's Lolcow.
No. 76045
>>76042it's far from the firdt time a topic has been banned outside of containment, whybshiuld ai be special
>>76043>notice hiw you didn't deny itbeen here since 2016 but this isn't a court of law, no one is obligated to disprove your retardo "everyone i don't like is a newfag" arguments
regardless i genuinely think ai slop is low quality posting and shits up the board. Clearly i'm not the only one with that opinion.
if your autism compels you to bang prompts on a keyboard like a monkey with a typewriter until your husbando comes out with a regular number of fingers, you can do that in the containment thread. ain't life grand?
No. 76047
>>76046>projecting your own newfaggotry whenever it's called outClassic
>>76045Sure, Jan. You probably would've thrown a shitfit in 2016 Lolcow daily.
>more strawmanning because reee everyone who doesn't share my opinion must make ai imagesYou keep doing this because you can't argue with anything I've said. Again: It's just dumb to ban inconsequential things over a couple of autists malding. This goes for Sonic, it goes for doodles, anything. If it's not gore, porn or avatarfagging, it doesn't matter.
No. 76052
File: 1714235656595.jpg (17.97 KB, 474x473, 0923811.jpg)
>>76051Where's the bait, though? It truly isn't a significant problem if someone types something here and uses one AI pic. There are actual issues on the site.
No. 76058
File: 1714237638070.png (773.71 KB, 1080x642, l0umer0dspb31.png)
>>76053If you could read, you'd see me saying the constant OPs and avatarfagging were bad. A random post by some anon with an AI pic attached isn't that, and treating it the same is just being overzealous and retarded.
Accusing me of posting it is kind of worthless when mods can look at post history.
No. 76060
File: 1714237916143.gif (1.59 MB, 372x298, 1640279846539.gif)
>>76055
No. 76071
File: 1714251862063.jpg (90.25 KB, 348x468, GCKWdQKbsAAFk5b.jpg)
Probs a dumb question. Is there an extension ala 4chan X to save threads that you visit often?
No. 76098
File: 1714262262575.png (67.28 KB, 1071x889, janniesaregay.png)
Jannies have suddenly been granted the ability to moderate threads properly, and which thread do they get overly strict with? The moid worship thread.
Stop deleting posts like the faggots at CC you fucking softies.
No. 76107
File: 1714263244729.png (87.41 KB, 720x747, IMG_20240427_181049.png)
Immediately banned for a simple question?
Why are you allowing a thread no one wants to exist?
No. 76113
>>76106>>76107It honestly feels like a jannie got her
or his feelings hurt and is lashing out because lc isn't more accepting of moid praise
No. 76114
>>76112Jesus Christ, kek
>>76113Exactly how it looks.
No. 76126
File: 1714264293205.png (21.8 KB, 720x188, IMG_20240427_182645.png)
What's going on? Why are you deleting so many comments? I don't want to be mean to farmhands because they do a lot for the site. But this feels like power tripping, there's a whole collection of deleted posts from dissatisfied anons, it feels like discord/reddit levels of petty. You can do better than this. I'm sorry. This isn't okay, anons are allowed to decide what threads should not stay up as a community. Reported threads that people don't want stay locked. This was a thing before
No. 76128
File: 1714264456329.png (9.75 KB, 816x201, Lmao.png)
Kek, they deleted the lower one, but let the other stay. Embarrassing and clearly showing their side of the argument.
No. 76153
File: 1714265457977.gif (984.83 KB, 500x334, IMG_1535.gif)
damn tgat pickme jannie needs to get the mop taken away from her
anyway
moids get the rope
troons get the rope
moids get the rope
No. 76154
File: 1714265491462.jpg (140.94 KB, 1080x1017, Screenshot_20240427-214650_Chr…)
Stop deleting posts lmao you guys don't get that fast when men post gore but a flayed statue gets insta deleted also not my fault the only good men are Jesus and his merry band.
No. 76159
File: 1714265744172.jpeg (121.83 KB, 750x933, 7E67B00C-5FCB-4FF9-A74A-EC5327…)
that’s not very goated of you, farmhand :(((((( <3333
No. 76173
File: 1714265943175.jpeg (11.81 KB, 219x290, IMG_0225.jpeg)
>>76152My sides are folding in completely. They have time to delete all of those posts but they couldn’t quickly delete the thread when it was requested to? They aren’t that fast or efficient when it comes to cp or gore
No. 76183
>>76167You can't have been around for Shaymin. CP was posted multiple times a day and left up for hours.
>>76171Fucking retard. LC is a privately owned website and the admins can do whatever they want with it. No one has a right to post on this website. It's like going into a cafe, calling the female owner a tranny and then complaining that she kicked you out
Previous post deleted for grammar error.
No. 76206
>>76201>watching it and banning anons in minutes.In seconds more like
>>76202Kek
No. 76207
File: 1714266658288.jpg (26.71 KB, 1328x109, okay.JPG)
So calling women
>nasty ass literal cum receptacles
is cool and fine to leave up, but posting Jesus is a 7 day ban and a deleted post
No. 76211
File: 1714266763304.png (188.29 KB, 583x1243, picture .png)
At last it was finally locked. Thank you
>>76200That thread isn't even blackpill
No. 76224
>>76223>Everyone who disagrees with me is the same anonYou janny wk's
and actual jannies are so embarrassing
No. 76229
>>76200oh no we shouldn't be too mean for the poor moids unu
leave
>>76201ikr. it's only a small step from allowing moid worship threads and banning dissenters to allowing male posters outright
No. 76234
>>76230It was the same farmhand that we had to unfortunately let go.
>>76231This is false. We have very strict rules about this that we go over with staff when they start. If we see them doing so, we remove them from their position.
>>76232Yes.
No. 76236
>>76228>as there required a longer discussion about it's existence.Im so confused what is there to discuss about when the majority of the userbase here doesn't want that thread or do you not care about how the userbase feels and are trying to run rhis site to the ground?
I dont think the admin or farmhand privileges should be used this way…..
No. 76238
>>76228ty for the response but why should there be a discussion about its existence? doesn't seem such a thread is compatible with board culture
>>76235It's kind of a weird complaint, as long as it's on topic wrt anime why would it warrant mod action?
No. 76240
>>76233>Dehumanizing women for being sexual beingsStandard lolcow. Rant about men, posture at separatism but rage with the fury of a thousand suns if anyone mocks BPD promiscuity because of a guilty conscience.
If you don't like most men, and I would count myself as someone who doesn't, then stop caping for trashy and promiscuous behavior.
No. 76242
>>76214It seems like this site is now for weird tradthot baiters like you.
This is like the 30th post this week ive seen of something misogynistic like this and it didnt get banned but i bet after my post the jannys will give you a small 2 hour ban to make it look like they are dokng their job when you baiters deserve a permanent ban.
No. 76243
>>76236To be honest, I'm referring to not just that specific thread, but a general restructure of some threads/boards. There's been some discussion on /meta/ about some things like making /img/ for images and such but we wanted a proper concession with the farmhands for such actions before moving forward and proposing it to the rest of the users here.
>>76239This is indeed the case for some.
No. 76246
>>76243Your post was specifially about that thread though but whatever you say. Also i dont know if i could ask this but was the farmhand who got let go also the same one who was banning anons unfairly? Im asking because i had to deal with some unfair bans where all of a sudden i got a permanent ban for no reason on months old posts and i always appealed them and the bans got removed because they were false.
The recent false ban i received was on a weeks old post of me just saying that the ariana hate was going too far, i apealed it and the permanent ban was removed but the fact that i got a perm ban for it (the post didn't break any rules) in the first place was so weird.
No. 76247
>>76244You are very obviously a baiter that im not even going to bother feeding you attention anymore.
That anon who made the swedish roommate post was obviously a baiter and you are also a baiter.
No. 76253
>>76248You have no idea how mod.php works.
>>76249The admins can see more than IPs. Browsers and devices that are used to access the internet have several identifiers. Even if the IP changes, these identifiers remain the same.
No. 76258
>>76255I've been around image boards for a long time.
>>76256Lurk more
>>76257I'm not a farmhand and I never have been.
No. 76262
>>76259Its a moderator anon. They are using anon right now to defend their lame ass before they switch back to their mod status and start banning us for 3 month old posts.
The mod php thing they said 100% coninves me of this being a janny on anon.
No. 76269
File: 1714275997336.jpeg (34.78 KB, 452x678, IMG_3625.jpeg)
So ummmm… can we have a “bad moid stories thread”? Pretty please?
No. 76280
>>76234>It was the same farmhand that we had to unfortunately let go.Kek why does this sound so sad? Power tripping isn't good.
>>76228I don't think the thread should come back. Same thing will repeat. It really wouldn't be the wisest decision to let it stay.
No. 76282
>>76228>As for the good moid stories thread, it is locked until further notice as there required a longer discussion about it's existence.I think it should stay locked.
>>76243>To be honest, I'm referring to not just that specific thread, but a general restructure of some threads/boards. There's been some discussion on /meta/ about some things like making /img/ for images and such I think this is a different topic altogether that doesn't really relate to the good mood thread, but as for /img/, I approve of its creation
No. 76286
File: 1714294158707.gif (980.4 KB, 376x285, 1000387896.gif)
There's always been a divide in the site because not every single person who uses it is a radfem (this is a lc site first) but the radfem users want it to be. I came here to follow the queen but I think the progression of the site is natural and I don't mind it, it was way worse and the post quality was so much lower when moids were allowed, I just hate the constant infighting.
I think the thread should stay locked because it only highlights this userbase division and it's already caused a shitstorm. There's also way too many fucking threads about males, I already avoid /g/ for this reason, don't turn /ot/ into /g/ please
No. 76297
>>76286I think there must be some sort of middle ground between allowing men on this site and turning this into a suffragette imageboard. It's just that it's gotten a little overbearing these past few years and every other post/topic is about MEN and feels like a competition on who's the most radfem and anons grandstanding/getting on their high horse/whatever you wanna call it. It has contributed to the aggressive and overall less fun energy of lolcow recently, imo. I also think it's always going to look off and out of place here considering this is ultimately a gossip board. Even with the dying milk boards, there's always gonna be someone in /m/ and /ot/ saying "hey, look at this weirdo". I think all of this is the fault of the second to last admin banning /2X/. But then it's also like, what can you even do to change the site now? If staff were to do anything they'd probably be accused of trying to make this site male friendly so it's purely a userbase issue.
This isn't about that "good moid" thread btw. I didn't care about that thread. It's just my thoughts on the state of lolcow.
No. 76306
>>76299NTA. This isn't a feminist website or even an anti-male website. It's primary purpose is as a gossip website for documenting lolcows. It became female only over time because the main demographic of the site was women from /cgl/.
If you want a website that is dedicated to hating men, then create your own and administrate it how you want. IB software is free and open source. Trying to transform an already existing site with an established purpose and culture into your personal political safe space is never going to work.
No. 76312
>>76306there is a
terf banner now, cope
No. 76314
File: 1714307390386.gif (2.79 KB, 300x100, IMG_3610.gif)
>>76306but this is an anti-male website, have you looked at the banners lol
you don't have to be a radfem or suffragette to dislike moids btw.
>>76292/g/ and /ot/ have a pretty different culture, many /ot/ anons don't much go to /g/ and vice versa
No. 76317
>>76307I wish this was true. I don't have a problem with man hate, the problem only occurs when it takes over everything else the site is supposed to be about. As I said LC's primary purpose is as a gossip website but it's also unique in that it's a site where women can talk about anything within the rules. Yet we have people fighting to destroy that and trying to limit what can be discussed.
>>76310No shit there's man hate on a women's website. My point is that man hate is not the primary or only purpose of the site. Man hate is part of the culture, not the entirety of it.
>>76314>>76316My point is not that man hate doesn't belong here, it's that discussion that is not man hate should also be allowed.
No. 76323
File: 1714309895603.png (59.69 KB, 1806x141, 1714265904205.png)
>>76292Because the nigel thread wasn't created by a power hungy baiting farmhand to troll the site, why is that so hard to get? Which is also why I don't get why Admin is even entertaining unlocking it, why tf would we want troll threads made by sockpuppeting jannies opened? It was just made to ruin the site, not for any real discussion.
No. 76330
File: 1714312818618.png (157.86 KB, 594x1157, IMG_20240428_075813.png)
If you red text the infighter you should also red text the person who came into the thread to infight in the first place, just saying
No. 76336
>>76322Why is it bait? Is any opinion you don't like bait?
>You can discuss your nigels and family members in many other threadsYou can also vent about men or complain about men in other threads.
>Anons dunking on retarded ass kissing of moids is not a limit of your free speechIntentionally derailing a thread until it's impossible to use for it's intended purpose is limiting the speech of others.
>>76325I'm the anon that originally posted the screenshot to /meta/. An anon asked why a post was deleted and then the now fired farmhamd replied with "I ss'd it" and posted the cap of the anon post with mod.php clearly visible. The post had been up for around 10 - 15 minutes and none of the mentally delayed retards shitting up the thread recognised the screencap for what it was.
Farmhands identifying themselves and revealing the IPs of posters is a violation of trust between the moderation and site users, which is why I posted it to /meta/. I wanted to alert the admins as to what happened. I didn't do it as some sort of epic "tranny janny" own.
No. 76337
>>76336And apparently you're the same user as me since there's oy one
bootlicker. /meta/ is unusable and users like
>>76334 who avatarfag so hard for funsies. These users aren't here to use the site properly.
No. 76344
>>76341I don't think you realize it's to
mock users same way the shitposters do it to
mock users. There's no
singular user kek
No. 76352
File: 1714346961887.png (809.55 KB, 1080x1961, Screenshot_20240428-182422~2.p…)
I got banned for "ai bait" in the Ugly Man PsyOp Discussion Thread #3 for posting this.it isn't even ai at all it's something that got made over 10 years ago, dumbass mods.y'know the funny thing is that Zac Efron is looking exactly like that even if 40 years haven't passed yet lol.
No. 76353
File: 1714357115888.png (15.39 KB, 903x224, 111111111111111111111111.png)
Anyone else noticed the uptick of typo nonas in /ot/? I don't know if it's the same person but they keep replying to their post with the correction rather than deleting and reposting. They all stand out so much.
No. 76365
Since when is the ugly man psyop thread a place to discuss moids you find attractive? What happened to the thread topic?
>>76358This might be a good idea
No. 76378
File: 1714437856166.jpeg (98.74 KB, 640x631, farmhandspolicy.JPEG)
just jokes
No. 76379
>>76378Lmfao. Years ago some
nonny showed me a trick on how to make an (allegedly) acceptable heart emoticon using #s. I did it and a farmhand banned me and I’m still kinda salty about it. Why encode the trick if we can’t even use it?
No. 76392
File: 1714505373142.jpg (614.8 KB, 926x1389, Trannyjanny.jpg)
This is not a tinfoil this is pattern recognition and a hypothesis. Can mods remove the retarded janny that camps in Jill's thread? Thanks.
No. 76399
>>76395>>76396>>76398Please report them as soon as you see them. As
>>76397 has said, it's a scrote trying to raid and they get banned and deleted on sight but try to ban evade every so often. I understand the frustration of those baits but please do not respond to them, it only encourages them to continue.
No. 76417
File: 1714700302256.png (46.33 KB, 926x407, firefox_uX8B3dswR5.png)
>>76071You can enable 4chan X to work on lolcow.