File: 1707936388338.png (2.69 MB, 1694x1544, IMG_2399.png)
No. 70464
I'm going to be annoyed if leftcows gets locked again. It feels inevitable at this point
>>70463That anon is deranged kek
No. 70466
File: 1707937583099.jpg (133.21 KB, 1172x551, 4965681020.jpg)
>>70463She's unrelenting with this conspiracy
No. 70474
File: 1707938984427.jpeg (913.68 KB, 1170x1593, IMG_2402.jpeg)
>>70466Good job cowtipping, sped
No. 70480
File: 1707940303331.png (282.88 KB, 1867x847, rattle.png)
>>70478Why are you posting this in like 3 different threads if you aren't sure? This is some of the dumbest admin fearmongering yet. Here's the source for everyone else
>>>/snow/1962520 No. 70481
File: 1707940351737.jpg (Spoiler Image,102.65 KB, 613x571, Why not just delete it.jpg)
Genuine question but why didn't farmhands delete this post? Sure it shows consumerism but does it need to have a ethot in it? They banned the user because of it I'm sure but why keep the post up when lesser bans have their posts deleted?? I'm seeing more and more clear moid posts being kept up? Why?
No. 70488
File: 1707941726405.jpeg (624.77 KB, 693x1045, IMG_0431.jpeg)
>>70486Well it wasn’t. Attaching my screencap that I have since deleted from /snow/ for context. I now see that
>>70474 has the same theme as me, which may have caused the confusion, but this was posted before me. I thought /snow/ would be a more appropriate place to discuss it, which is why I posted it there
No. 70491
File: 1707941841764.jpeg (235.48 KB, 713x708, IMG_0432.jpeg)
>>70487The anon in this thread and in picrel. I was too busy laughing to use critical thinking, my sincerest apologies
No. 70519
>>70514It's ridiculous the lengths you'll go to trying to spin up a story to discredit all the many anons unhappy with recent moderations choices. Here's a list of all the ones tried so far.
Anons criticizing cerbmin are:
>all the same person just samefagging>newfags who want lolcow to be discord>underage and should be banned>personalityfags (? don't get this one but ok)>just bitter social rejects (kek what)>trannies running gayops <- NEW No. 70529
File: 1707958833136.png (224.19 KB, 889x305, Screen Shot 2024-02-14 at 7.57…)
>>70528Holy fuck can you shut up about that ban. You got banned because you were baiting in the vent thread with an anti-Lesbian post, then you started infighting with other anons, when they called you out for baiting you started samefagging to roleplay as different people to continue infighting. That's why you got banned the first time. Then you got so pissed off about the ban that you hopped over to another thread to complain about it and in the process you demonstrated that you were evading your first ban, so you got banned again. It's not that deep. It's a ban on LC. It's not the end of the world. You've been sperging about that ban for the past 3 days in multiple threads. It's annoying as fuck.
No. 70530
>>70529I was never baiting nor pretending to be other people. There were more posters responding to that anon and they said they weren't banned. Stop making shit up to justify your retarded mods doing stupid shit. And that still doesn't answer why I was banned again for an old post after serving my ban.
Also I wasn't evading my first ban, it expired and then I appealed the second, and it was accepted because they know it was bullshit. Aren't you tired of being wrong? Thats embarrassing.
No. 70531
File: 1707960580246.png (313.99 KB, 818x681, can you shut the fuck up about…)
>>70530You posted bait in the vent thread. You started infighting and double-posting in the vent thread as per the redtext you received. You went to the stupid questions thread to start freaking out about the ban. Then you got banned again and came back to the stupid questions thread to complain about it again. Then you started infighting again so you got banned again, for the third time. It's been five days since you got banned for posting bait. Can you shut the fuck up about it already, seriously.
>I appealed the second and it was accepted.So why are you malding about it. Seriously what is the point of talking about your retarded bans if you're just going to ban evade anyway?
No. 70537
>>70531Where are you taking double posting? I haven't. Does doubleposting for you means something different because I wasn't and I didn't get ban for baiting nor doubleposting. I wasn't the anti lesbian baiter, I probably made like 5 posts in the vent thread responding that anon and they banned me after I disengaged from this stupid discussion. Please, provide proof of doubleposting, you followed me on that thread to accuse me of doubleposting and keep doing it here.
>if I was the anti lesbian baiter(I wasn't) then why I wasn't banned for that?
>if I was double posting (I wasn't)Then why I wasn't banned for that?
>if I was samefagging (again… I wasn't)Then why I wasn't banned for samefagging?
Instead I was banned for infighting, and another anon came saying she was involved in the fighting before I even got to that thread and she didn't get any bans.
That's what you can't explain, instead you follow me everywhere to call me out on things that aren't true. That's what is pissing me off. My whole problem is that I waited for my ban to expire like I always do. Many years in this site I never used vpn, I never post bait, I am not even anti lesbian, I am attracted to women myself and said many times in g and ot, and I am accused of being a scrote from time to time because I express myself in that crude way, yet I never ban evade. I appealed my bans two or three times all these years for things that are clearly unfair, the mods got nothing on me and the proof is that they needed to ban me for a day old post instead of banning me for things you accuse me of.
Now read what I just wrote because I am repeating myself and you still can't understand. Stop reading picture books of gay families and start to actually understanding the words. What do you get out of this? Spreading lies, have no proof of anything, what? A crumble of attention from the farmhand? Pathetic.
No. 70549
File: 1707962290719.png (171.47 KB, 399x655, jm-e1527175750863.png)
do you think he could have saved us
No. 70551
>>70545The "big kek" post was a part of her weird rant. If you go back to the lesbian book cover rant (which was 5 days ago at this point) it's obvious it's the same anon that's arguing with everyone else. Her "big kek" was probably the one that got her banned because it was the last response she posted in her tirade before she got bored. She even admits in her post here
>>70537 that she was infighting and responding to bait and made 5 posts doing so. At this point I don't bother interacting with her, she's obviously just doing all this for attention or something. I only responded to her this time because it's like the 10th time she's posted about this and I wanted to clear the record for the other anons in this thread that might not realize she's retarded and full of shit.
No. 70556
File: 1707962787479.png (300.21 KB, 1718x1882, x.PNG)
I have a suggestion: instead of rules about how we're supposed to post and what we're allowed to discuss, simply make a list of things we are allowed to post. The list will be very short making it easier for everyone.
No. 70557
>>70549No, he is a disgusting pig
>>70551Attention? I am unhappy with the moderation and I will say so. You are happy having crap admins/jannies, alright, but don't go making shit up. You can't even point out my posts, just go like a retard "samefag samefag samefag, doublepost" you can't even read and conveniently ignore all the other anons that also said they were unfairly banned. What do you get from this? Honest question, because it is pathetic that level of devotion to a bad administration.
>>70552And you decided that you will keep kissing their asses because "nothing will change"? Grow some spine you fucking coward.
No. 70559
File: 1707963143653.jpeg (447.21 KB, 1242x675, IMG_1705.jpeg)
>>70557>>70553>>70550>>70548>>70535>>70534Picrel. Don't bother engaging with this poster. It's a waste of time.
No. 70565
File: 1707964826789.png (126.24 KB, 1238x339, idiocy live in 4k.png)
>>70539She camps in /meta and when she doesn't get enough attention she starts posting bait in /ot threads to get banned so she can complain about it more in /meta. She's been milking her own bans for the past 5 days to tinfoil about the farmhands and to try and sow discord among the site's userbase.
>>70542She tries to mix up her typing style to make the samefagging more innocuous but she does the same typing style mix-ups each time so it gives her away really easily. Once you get a grasp of her habits in forming sentence structure you can easily identify her.
No. 70569
File: 1707965849778.gif (749.93 KB, 358x480, u mad?.gif)
>>70566Uh oh everyone, she's mad we can see through her samefagging bait antics.
No. 70574
>>70570Thanks
nonny thumbs up
No. 70591
>>70586so only two people are getting banned in /ot/?
>>70590this is the only time i mentioned posts slowing down wtf are you on about?
No. 70593
>>70584The tranny comments are probably self-reflective. The samefag troll is obsessed with accusing the farmhands of being trans is probably some crazed tranny trying to create division as
>>70514 mentions. It's funny because the camper directly responds to that point with derision in these posts:
>>70515,
>>70517,
>>70520,
>>70521, trying to discreetly play both sides. I assume this /meta camper is some TIM NEET that is really really bored and trying to entertain themselves.
No. 70604
>>70593None of these posts are mine kekk
>>70600I'd still be here because I am not this mythical camper samefag vpn user troon psyopper. Imagine thinking I'd leave the site because you've adquired a brand new type of mental illness.
No. 70605
File: 1707976751679.png (21.63 KB, 1024x73, Screen Shot 2024-02-15 at 12.5…)
>>70565>When she doesn't get enough attention she starts posting bait in /ot threadsPicrel is an example of this behaviour. The camper tries to fan the flame she started in /meta and goes into other threads to try and lure anons into coming to /meta themselves to read through all her bullshit and try to fight with her when this thread slows down and we stop responding to her bait.
No. 70607
Anons claiming that it’s some samefag vpn gayops camper posting complaints in /meta/ are retarded baiters. Ignore them, as
>>70595 said. Anyone that genuinely believes this is delusional.
No. 70609
File: 1707977858374.jpg (38.61 KB, 736x699, 7434343636357.jpg)
>>70608i'm only the second post you linked. what can i do to prove i'm not a samefag? i can send my device info to cerebmin if that helps
No. 70613
File: 1707978305631.png (454.87 KB, 1722x1090, 07234.png)
please do sth about the anti-fujo retard losing its shit every time it sees the slightest mention of m/m.
No. 70637
>>70633No, there isn't. The fandom thread is possibly the only option and that discussion gets hijacked by retards who want to sperg about how fujos are all misogynist trannies addicted to rape porn and shota because they caught brainworms from endlessly doomscrolling the fakeboi thread for their confirmation bias.
>>70636Thanks for the swift explanation, please add the "moved to /x/ board" text next time when you do it to avoid confusion.
No. 70640
>>70636Thank you for the reply farmhand.
However I argue that the fujocoomer cringe thread should also be moved to /snow/ to maintain coherence. Despite not having an OP mentioning specific cows as this one does, the caps posted there consist in highlighting specific users' posts just like what you might find on /snow/ with Tiktok/Instagram cringe girls, bookcows, and FTM/MTF threads. Both fujo and anti-fujo cringe threads are complementary, and serve as a way to divert the discussion from shitting up /ot/ constantly. It's only natural they be together on the same board or they will not serve a containment function, even if containtement was not the first goal of the thread creation. Some of the above-mentioned threads do not mention specific cows in the OP either yet they are perfectly placed in /snow/. Fujocoomer cringe should follow.
No. 70644
>>70640I really don't wanna get in trouble for personalityfagging and since this is the only
valid way to respond, I should let you know that of the 3 posts you linked in the anti-fujo thread of "fixation", only one is made by me, the other were made by separate users, saying I have a fixation of little boys being raped is on par with TRA's claiming "TERFs are obsessed with children's genital, cause they oppose child mutilation" I'm simply pointing a strong correlation between extreme misogyny and pederasty, granted I too repeat myself often, I'm willing to admit that.
also I don't know what the fuck is going with my status.
No. 70654
>>70650The threads that we have on other imageboard personalityfags are ones who were mainly on/from 4chan, and Rita, who no one even knew about until admin exposed her. Making threads on all the personalityfags here is just going to encourage infighting, which would defeat the purpose of the last hellweek.
>The thread hasnt even talked about her yet.That thread basically immediately got locked.
>Seems like a certain pakistani ban evader doesnt like reaping what she sowsVery predictable
No. 70661
File: 1708024315478.jpeg (111.68 KB, 686x990, EAA64181-E8CC-4E8F-B6A1-F9D728…)
>>70659Sorry I got it slightly wrong but here it is.
No. 70669
File: 1708033548460.png (20.51 KB, 719x371, are you sure.PNG)
>>70459not a complaint or a suggestion, but how is this blogging? we can't shit on sissies?
No. 70670
File: 1708033908858.jpg (38 KB, 551x401, stefan.jpg)
>>70667Same. The meta thread has it all: conspiracy theories, name-calling, baseless accusations, schizoposting, mod drama, legit complaints, memes, lore. I'm on no anon's side; I'm on everyanon's side
No. 70694
File: 1708044624981.jpg (338.88 KB, 1080x1147, Screenshot_20240216_004533_Chr…)
Not my post just catching up on the thread but what was twitter like about this?
No. 70708
File: 1708050747024.jpeg (1.04 MB, 1620x1470, A1F581C2-0130-4A31-831C-A8E95D…)
Why is every other group allowed to have a race based thread except Muslim and white women? Why did the Muslim girls thread get locked immediately.
No. 70712
>>70711This.
Holy fuck admin. Please take the hint. Everyone is tired of this bullshit.
No. 70714
>>70713Not this shit again. Yet again, an anon here claims multiple anons to be the same person. I’m
>>70709, but none of the others. Some people may have different opinions from you. Shocking, right?
No. 70715
>>70714Lolcow 101 is if someone says something you don't like they're either a scrote, tranny or samefag. Couldn't just be women with differing opinions
>>70713If you're gonna claim all this then either flair up janny or stop being a schizo
No. 70718
File: 1708052665749.png (173.88 KB, 1575x368, C05348DE-F2E0-45B2-B82F-5E6F30…)
Why is a-logging and encouraging terrorism allowed now? What the fuck has happened to this board.
No. 70719
>>70718Again this post is from the same person as I mentioned in this post:
>>70713. You can tell it's the camper because they're purposely targeting the Black Girls thread, this screenshot they attached is from their earlier attempts to troll that thread today. They're now posting it here to try and sow more weird racial division because they're too stupid to realize we all see through bullshit.
No. 70729
>>70722I believe he keeps using a VPN to ban evade. I don't think farmhands are on the site 24/7 moderating everything that goes on. If they are banning him, they might not be redtexting. For context this poster:
>>70726,
>>70727,
>>70720 are all posts from the retard camper.
No. 70730
>>70726You made the exact same accusation in your first spergout where you samefagged, and self-reported, saying there are "no biological women in the thread".
These are deleted, but I'm sure mods can see them:
>>>/g/379602>>>/g/379554If not, I can screencap but it'd be multiple images.
No. 70734
>>70732Thanks, I'll screencap a bunch and try to get them together.
>>70729You're right, it's definitely an unintelligent male trying to get all the threads locked with fetish posts and general racebait. I don't know why he's convinced he can trick the mods and all farmers, it's unsettling.
No. 70743
>>70737>who the fuck browses meta kekLots of people? As another poster said above, this is one of the milkiest threads on the board right now because we can finally see who’s constantly baiting and trolling when we piece it all together.
>>70740Nah you need to take your meds, you’re clearly upset because I clocked your racist ass calling mixed girls half breeds because you literally posted in the EXACT same format in the same thread. Now you’re backtracking and claiming you love blasian girls. And you worship a pedophile which says it all. You disgust me.
No. 70744
>>70741>>70743Lol yep see, he deleted his post accusing us of being the same person. What a retard.
And I’m
>>70743Btw.
No. 70750
>>70747No it’s not. I don’t know about the other posts but only
>>70743>>70744>>70736Are mine. I know you’re a troll but you really suck at it. Farmhands can check the IPs.
No. 70754
>>70749Yup it's most likely the same guy.
>>70752Yup it is hilarious. His meltdown in this thread right now is cringey. He keeps responding to himself (in the exact same typing style) and pretending to be a different person.
No. 70759
I’d like a farmhand to confirm that
>>70751>>70748 (me)
And
>>70741>>70743 (me)
Are indeed different posters and have different IPs, unlike what the schizo inbred troon is claiming. I’ll wait.
No. 70764
>>70760I don’t use VPNs. I always use the exact same IP going back months/years, mods can check.
>>70761I’ve never spammed porn because it’s fucking disgusting, and I’m the one defending blasian and mixed girls from racists who call them half breeds. As usual you’re the troon troll simply deflecting your own posts. The mod can see everything, remember that.
No. 70765
>>70764This is me btw.
It’s so funny that the Muslim pedophile worshipping schizo who spams porn and calls mixed girls half breeds is now accusing me of being him. Mods can likely see months and months back if not years on my IP, and can confirm I have never posted porn or mixed girl hate, ever. I’m literally the one trying to get porn spammers and mixed girl haters/racists banned. Nobody is falling for your bait and switch garbage, tranny-kun.
No. 70767
>>70763Yyyyup. I feel like he can't go without attention, so he waits a couple of days and then accuses other people of posting his own bait to try and "win" any given argument.
He typically talks in the same nasty way, but sometimes tries to mix in "ebonics" and "stan speak" from Twitter in the black girl thread. The freakout and projection when that was pointed out here basically confirms it to me. I'd love for him to point out the "constant ebonics" in any of "my" posts.
No. 70769
>>70768I'm
>>70767, and my post was made one minute apart from the one you're claiming is me. Lie all you want, mods can see deleted posts, all your racism and moid admissions, and other information besides IP.
"I have one IP I use and a VPN for my troll posts" isn't a flex. 41% and leave black, Asian, mixed and white women alone.
No. 70771
>>70767>>70763>>70761>>70754>>70752>>70745>>70740This is what an actual samefag on a VPN looks like.
>>70769I’m the mixed French nona. I’ve already posted a vocaroo before proving I’m a real woman. You want me to do it again or something? You can’t pin all your mixed girl hate and porn posting on me, sorry transvestite-kun.
No. 70775
>>70771>Camper pins 7 different posts.>Only the last 2 are his posts.>The first 5 are two different anons cognizant of the camper's antics.Okay camper.
>>70774This post is also from the camper.
No. 70778
>>70771I'm all those posts but
>>70754 and
>>70763. Replying to your sperging isn't samefagging, unless you're planning to impersonate me for your next AGP mental break. No one cares about your totally real vocaroos, we won't send you any in return, and we don't want your nudes.
No. 70797
>>70793t. Mindbroken tranny
Glad I hit a nerve
No. 70802
>>70782>make a joke on otBan for infighting
>comment on a cow Ban for derailing
>just post anything on ot reallyBan
>bait in meta about "camper" to change the subject and downplay farmers concerns about unfair bansNo ban
Are we really expected to believe the mods are not on this
>>70795I had an anon during oldmin era telling me she used to be a janny and the reason I was getting too long bans for harmless posts was because I say tranny a lot. Since then no one can convince me tranny jannies are not real, I don't care if I get called schizo, it was too weird and specific.
No. 70806
>>70800Sure. Mods can see all your posts, including ones you think are gone. Keep digging and projecting until you finally rope.
>Mindbroken isn’t a porn termhttps://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=MindbreakDo you ever get tired of lying about verifiable things and blogposting with second person pronouns?
No. 70811
>>70799Anons have posted about being former jannies before. You probably got rejected because they saw your post history you're so convinced you can hide.
>>70807It's because the moid (or moids) thinks this place is 1:1 with 4chan and wants to discredit the mods in case they expose them.
No. 70823
File: 1708061087351.png (490.09 KB, 449x401, 78971721-9AED-426E-B6E5-B7FE06…)
>>70817That’s it? That’s your sick tranny burn? Lame. Dilate your rotpocket hon, it’s healing closed. And don’t forget to keep worshipping your beloved pedophile.
No. 70844
File: 1708063476812.png (117.56 KB, 342x396, Catalog.png)
hmmm
No. 70851
>>70483You mean how it was up until oldmin? Good. Maybe it will mean less of the everyone I don't like is a scrote shit and derailing.
Fucking newfags.
>>70487I'm trying to catch up on this thread and all I see is Ritard doing her latest conspiracy and faggots like you buying in.
No. 70852
>>70514LMAO
Fucking hell. This shit is like clockwork now.
No. 70875
>>70870>/w/Sorry for your thread's death,
nonnie.
Farmhands are getting pretty heavy handed when it comes to which threads they consider to have "cows" and which don't. LC in itself is a drama website, it's normal that most threads be filled with drama whether they be in off-topic or cow boards. Moving threads to the cow boards is not going to revive them.
No. 70878
>>70876>proposal to merge /w/ back into /snow/Considering the interest in fashion threads on both /ot/ and /g/ I wonder if a general purpose cosplay and fashion board would be worthwhile.
>create /img/Agree.
>proposal to allow MTF and FTM discussion threads back on /ot/, since the /snow/ thread is apparently just for specific tiffy and timmy cowsIf it's cow discussion it should stay on /snow/ imo
No. 70888
>>70870It was a stupid move. That thread doesn't fit in with /w/ at all.
>>70876>proposal to merge /w/ back into /snow/Admin should do a formal vote on this. I think a lot of people would be for it. /w/ is dead as hell, moving everything over to /snow/ would ramp up activity at least a little.
No. 70894
File: 1708115524204.png (40.86 KB, 836x226, Screenshot 2024-02-16 at 21.28…)
Not my post but what's with this ban? She didn't contribute milk but she saged
No. 70905
>>70904Last thread their whole reasoning was because no one
ever namedrops lolcow which isn't even true lol There's even some spergy cow on tiktok commenting on the same lame crap the Venus Angelic posters have been peddling recently about posts being made by her even though they are automated. Lolcow is known on tiktok, twitter, Instagram.. We aren't some secret website. RFH is probably also just a poster.
No. 70910
>>70908Farmers are not troons spamming porn;
Only a couple farmers are schizo kek;
Being accused of being a scrote is just part of being on the site, only newfags get all offended and fight about it and newfags are a perpetual issue.
No. 70931
File: 1708139279092.png (988.63 KB, 1148x1254, kek what?.png)
ok I'm not trying to WK but this post in gioyc was obviously not a vent; it was meant to be a response to the multiple posts made by anons lately about being harassed, which you can see in the recent vent threads.
No. 70936
>>70934I'm an oldfag and I'm also not autistic, which is why I'm able to utilize these context clues to understand that the original post is meant to be a snarky response to all of the anons (because it looks like there have been many) who are currently
victims of harassment/stalking. It would be different if it was just a regular vent post but she made the decision to make it about other users, so you can't be surprised when other users decide to respond. I shouldn't have to explain that to you, but here we are.
No. 70939
>>70938>about you second anon but I'm not TA in the commentary from this post
>>70931 , I'm simply stating that we can all see the publicly posted comments in the vent thread and even other threads over the last decade the lolcow has been alive about experiencing situations like what we've talked about, and I don't think that they're all from one user. It's obvious that OP was trying to make a crude comment about how she thinks that you have to be 'worthy' of being harassed by some scrotal or another harmful individual, which is simply not true. You can't make a post like that and think that your asinine assumption is going to be protected by the 'no responding vain bitch!!' rule.
No. 70944
File: 1708149071414.png (183.18 KB, 2672x264, not bait.png)
Are you guys gonna explain this
No. 70951
File: 1708149487479.jpg (45.91 KB, 735x698, 9fb34507ec59e7472df6f2836d8929…)
>>70949>i gotta step in nowAnd who the fuck are you??
No. 70954
>>70949>>70950>>70952These posts are all from the camper.
>>70951Kek that's funny picture nona but don't bother responding to the camper, it just gets him more riled up.
No. 70962
>>70958It’s ok if you have poor reading comprehension but
>a large pool of womenI personally have never been stalked, but I’ve also been on lolcow for 8 years and have read a boatload of posts authored by women who have, which is why I feel comfortable commenting on how the original post was inappropriate; especially because she went as far as saying ‘None of you’ as if she was directly talking to all of the users on this website who have been vulnerable enough with us online to share their struggles. And it is an incredibly ugly thing to post. I don’t really care if it makes me and everyone else sound like a ‘vain bitch’ but it’s much more vain and bitchy to say what OP said kek.
No. 70968
File: 1708158121868.jpeg (42.82 KB, 946x807, download-1434.jpeg)
>DA CAMPER, DA CAMPER!
No. 70970
File: 1708159184046.jpeg (311.41 KB, 675x777, IMG_0465.jpeg)
Farmhands, this was a missed opportunity to use “user has been put out to the pasture.” Also how is this bait? It just seems like retarded shitposting not bait
No. 70972
>>70916ntayrt but scrote accusations are already bannable
>>70941>(even some in support of pedophilia)wtf can you show the redtext?
No. 70974
File: 1708162477656.png (256.97 KB, 1860x334, realy retarded.png)
the most shortbus redtext i have seen in a while
No. 70982
Those are all baits
>>>/ot/1891124,
>>>/ot/1891432 made by tranny. Might be also posting somewhere else. I suspect this post was made by him too
>>>/ot/1890987.
No. 70984
>>70944kek "bait" for being too honest about moids for farmhands.
>>70894Just make a new rule where you can't poo poo males farmhands. Be honest with your motivations for banning these posts.
No. 70987
>>70459Someone is posting about retarded
terf whores in unpopular opinions. Trying to bait people.
No. 70994
>>70971Because just like scrotes have fun spamming gore and cp because they think it's hilarious to upset women and use children, our anons like baiting the staff and anons for fun. I don't know what to tell you if you haven't seen that drastic change since 2019. It's gotten out of hand because they won't moderate places like /meta/ [because they want these threads to be an open free-for-all because the users deserve somewhere they can talk about anything], so they camp out in here and ruin these threads when they get banned from other boards and then just bait in /meta/.
It's being allowed because they are just allowing it. I understand why they won't enforce banning VPNs because women online need safety and taking that away because men post here isn't the smart idea, but I don't think unmoderating clear bait in threads on /meta/ should be allowed. Instead of making it a place anons can openly discuss and criticize staff, it's turned into a bunch of anons running through threads like crazy due to staff tinfoils and such. Admin and farmhands reminding up every two threads isn't stopping it. Moderating certain types of users constantly will be a pain, but they need to keep on it in all boards. Otherwise you get them overrunning and constantly fucking around with every thread they touch and banning off /meta/ isn't doing enough.
No. 70999
>>70994>just like scrotes have fun spamming gore and cp because they think it's hilarious to upset women and use children, our anons like baiting the staff and anons for fun.the fuck?
These are not remotely comparable, and
>our anonsis a weird way to talk about the women posting on this site. But oh yeah, banning everyone who ever raises a question or concern about moderation is definitely the answer.
No. 71004
>>70993Hey nona, don't respond to this post:
>>70992, it's the camper trying to sow seeds of distrust between us. They figured out how to bold text now. All the "anons" that are "wrongly accused" that "jump in to defend themselves" are actually just the camper. For all the other farmers, cerbmin (or farmhands I don't remember but you can go back and check in the Hellweek thread) did address this in the last thread: he said that there was 1 or 2 retards camping here trying to schizopost and bait us all with pure unadulterated retardation. In the past few days the camper has moved from: complaining about justified bans (what farmer really cares about getting a <24 hour ban?), then he started sperging about troons (nobody talks about troons this much but he assumes we are all obsessed with troons so that's his ultimate insult as he pretends to be one of us), then he moved to posting racebait (like in the black girls thread last night), now he's moved back to posting retarded shit on /ot/ (like the gun post, seriously who posts a random gun saying "hehe i use this to murder people!!!" in the VENT thread? like
>>70998 says it screams moid post; another example is the troon bait being posted in the unpopular opinions thread like
>>70987 points out) to get more justified bans so he can sperg about how "bans aren't fair reee the farmhands are destroying this site by issuing bans reeeee i hate redtext reeee." It's all very basic retarded bullshit and it's easy to see through once you recognize his pattern. He will pretend to be many different anons to continue infighting with himself and to bait others into responding. Don't bother responding to his stupid bait.
No. 71005
>>71004I’m the latest “the camper” camperanon is pointing to, and it’s clear to me now more than ever that camperanon is a knowingly malicious actor and not a confused anon. Farmhands, do something about this NOW. If you do not, I know that either you are in on this, or you are conducting this psyop yourself. Other anons, read my bolded post
>>70992 , and report post I’m currently responding to. We need to force a response from the mod team. I cannot express how ridiculous this all is for farmhands to be banning every other post on /ot/ for bullshit reasons, but refusing to step in here even after DAYS of camperanon’s bullshit. I think our only option at this point is to flood the report system and force a response.
No. 71007
>>71006Kek for real! Happy you see it too nona. He has a hate boner for the farmhands because they do their job. I honestly feel bad for them and I'm happy farmhands take care of the website so well. If it's not obvious for others reading,
>>71005 is the camper: he is always complaining about the farmhands and does all this bullshit to create some ill-feeling towards them. It's just so stupid.
No. 71009
I’m
>>71005 and here
>>71006>>71007You can see camperanon samefagging as usual. All of camperanons accusations are mirrors of their own behavior (samefagging and baiting)
I call on anyone who has been accused of being “the camper” by camperanon over the last 3 days to mass report their posts NOW. I know there are a lot of us. Force a response from farmhands. Farmhands can see we’re not the same person camperanon is accusing so they have no reason to ignore our reports. Camperanon’s antics are baiting 101 and can be reported as such. No. 71014
>>71008Ayrt, I really don’t want to believe it and the thought is making me actually sick because I’ve loved this site for so many years, but I can’t think of any other explanation at this point. If this is true this is going to go down in lolcow history as a huge betrayal of the userbase unlike anything we’ve ever experienced before (if the site even survives under such a psychotic moderation team). This is next level and I’m in utter disbelief.
I’m glad you have reported camperanon, please don’t give up and please continue and urge others to do so as well if you are around to do so (unlike camperanon I can’t hang around this thread all day). Something needs to happen. Also, if you or I or any other anon get a retribution ban from farmhands for reporting camperanon (I sincerely hope this will not happen, but I’m scared at this point), let’s promise to
post our bans ITT and show other anons what’s going on.
No. 71017
>>71015For real it's been making me cringe since day one. I try my best not to respond directly to him, but I would feel amiss if I were to ignore completely lest my fellow farmers fall
victim to his baiting antics. Plus I think the farmhands get too much flack for waht they do; they keep the website operational and moderate the whole thing so I think they deserve a hearty 'thank you,' even if sometimes I disagree with their decisions I can see that they make them for the best. For those reasons, I'll occasionally come onto the thread to identify the camper's posts and make fun of him. The post above yours (>>>>71014) is especially cringe it reads like a soap opera script for D list actors. It's honestly just so deeply pathetic and unfunny. I'm gonna stop responding to you now nona but I'm happy we can agree that the camper is annoying and cringe as fuck.
No. 71018
File: 1708196978633.png (574.92 KB, 750x1334, 28B6F74A-E916-4BE8-9B77-067914…)
>>71014>>71009>>70992These are me and this is the last time I’m going to post for now, but I understand if anons haven’t been following this since it started it may be hard to make heads or tails of who is telling the truth, since camperanon likes to use our fears and lingo to LARP as one of us with their accusations (“look it’s a tranny! Look it’s a moid! Look it’s a racist! Don’t trust them!”). It’s hard to prove identity on an anonymous imageboard, so I know this isn’t much, but I offer up picrel, a screenshot from a normal day of browsing last month (date is in pic) before all of this started, to try to show that I am who I say I am— a normal farmer who more than anything just wants this to stop and for lolcow to survive. I love this place. I’m just hoping and praying at this point we can come through this and that the mod team has not abandoned us or actively psyoped us like it seems.
No. 71035
File: 1708204538649.jpeg (139.68 KB, 723x321, IMG_0469.jpeg)
>>71033Fucking retard jannies
No. 71036
File: 1708204551334.jpeg (163.48 KB, 828x330, IMG_2574.jpeg)
>>71033yeah and yet the radfem cows one stays open. hmmmm
No. 71058
File: 1708213783180.gif (1.85 MB, 344x352, ecb459f5292070f4d6516fa367ad80…)
So admins and farmhands, how do you guys feel now that killing the dumbass shit thread didn't change anything in /ot/ but instead turned this thread into the circus?
No. 71072
well, looks like the "this is the camper" baiter is awake again. remember to report and not respond. At least we had a few hours of peace where we could talk to each other
(from here
>>71032 to here
>>71070 , coincidentally a 7 hour gap. Hmm!)
No. 71076
>>71075Yup, its always around 10PM CST that this retard:
>>71074,
>>71072,
>>71067, decides to start camping and baiting. At this point you'd think he'd get a tent or something and actually go to a campsite
No. 71085
File: 1708234705162.jpeg (173.31 KB, 864x828, 351F728F-C25D-4D01-9FE2-7EA6D6…)
>>71082Thank you nona, but I disagree. I give up on this place. When farmhands become this rotten, there’s not a good way to come back from it imo. Also, for the first time in his life the schizo tranny was actually helpful to me, reminding me I accidentally had my IP address showing in the picture I posted. You all must forgive me, I’m not used to ban-evading or even being banned at all (unlike him kek) so I’m not in the routine of scratching numbers out from pictures. Here is my post again with the IP redacted:
Well, I tried my best, but as I predicted, farmhands, who have done nothing to stop the tranny from baiting us for 3 days, have given me a ban just for linking back to my own post with info about the baiter (whom they love so much for his help distracting the userbase), calling that “samefagging”. I give up. Predictably, the tranny is going to have a field day samefagging to this post, but will not be banned or redtexted, and farmhands will let him continue to run amok for the foreseeable future. I accept that there is nothing we can do now.
I am actually heartbroken at the state of this website, I have never seen farmhands this antagonistic to regular users, to the point they allow rule breaking if it distracts from farmer’s complaints. This is me giving up on lolcow after years of loving it to death and participating on all the boards from /ot/ to /m/ to /snow/. I’ve drawn Elsie fan art in the doodle board, I’ve created many threads over the years that have turned out so fun (I was the anon who started the MS Paint doodle threads on /m/ which were fun before they got lost in the great shaymin debacle, I created threads in /snow/ for stwawbwewwymilk and Rachel when she first came onto the scene, more recently I started the TMI thread in /ot/, which I’ve really enjoyed seeing everyone’s posts in.) I love you fellow nonas. I’m so sad this is how it ends, at least for me.
I now go out in a blaze of illegal glory, behold:
🎈🎁🧸🪆🎉🎏🎊🪅🚀🎇🎆🌅🌇🌄🔥💥☄️🌟⭐️✨☀️
Onto greener pastures!
No. 71086
File: 1708234745071.png (188.61 KB, 1050x331, Screen Shot 2024-02-18 at 12.3…)
>>71080>>71081>>71082>>71083>>71084Since the camper deleted the post (if it was farmhands that deleted it sorry for reuploading it you can delete my post too) here's what it said to anyone interested in what we're replying to.
No. 71099
>>71097I don't think so nona, sorry. You will have to choose between eye burning or hand burning here.
>>71096IP addresses don't contain that many letters unless it's a VPN (from what I know anyway). The fact that he was so easily and quickly able to ban evade as well is another pointer that the camper uses VPNs. The camper wont stop posting here, this post:
>>71085 was just a false-flag to make it seem like he was fucking off but he will continue to shit up this thread with his retardation. Just remember nonas, if someone is sperging about a ban or trying to rally others against the farmhands, it's the loser troon camper.
No. 71109
>>71108Yeah, whatever schizotranny. Don't you have some loli porn to jerk off to or something?
Anyway, I previously decided to leave because that ban
>>71085 was so ridiculous I figured it was a lost cause to stay. Seeing farmhands nearly instantly reverse my ban has convinced me it was probably a mistake, so I have faith enough to stay at least for now. Still doesn't excuse their absence from this thread while we really need them, though. I don't know what's going through their heads.
To be honest I hope I get banned for this post for responding to the schizo tranny, it would at least show they're finally cracking down here, and I probably need a 24 hour break. Hit me farmhands. I'm ready.
No. 71115
>>71110i'm absolutely sure the "everyone" you speak of is the schizotranny samefagging and perhaps one or two anons who haven't really been following this thread and assumed he was one of us since he uses tranny accusations to blend in (see above post, kek). For the 7 hours he was asleep no posts like that were made, plus, you can tell when it's him because he always posts rapidfire in a row while the natural pace of this thread is like once every 10 mins at MOST, and usually even longer. It also just occurred to me that his fixation on one word (this time it's "camper") is very characteristic of him, I remember back in the day it was "blend" and "sweep" and "jannies", if you were around for that you'll know what I mean kek.
We should get another ~7 hour break from his antics in about 24 hours
No. 71121
File: 1708240114642.png (741.59 KB, 609x581, weareallcampers.png)
>>71120liiiike fucking clockwork kekkkkkk. I wish picrel could be the next threadpic
No. 71122
>>71117I think that weird grandma anon sent moid porn once in dumbass shit and then defended it as "funny images"
>>>/ot/1788748. Take that as you will. Also i'm pretty sure they were that most vocal anti-fujo anon, who then started calling funposting a chatroom, then dumbass became a chatroom too. And they never get banned, as this anon pointed out
>>>/meta/70273.
No. 71128
>>71124they quite literally rescinded my ban because it was incorrect/unwarranted, which gives them +10 based points in my book, but not quite enough to get them out of the negatives. I guess you're mad about that because it was about to be a really miraculous asset for bolstering your narrative. Also, only 3/4 of the posts you tagged as "the camper" were me, but that's par for the course of your tactics I suppose, you throw a wide net on purpose. Again I welcome a ban from farmhands for engaging the schizotranny, I need a break outin the pasture.
>>71126i agree i think, but idk much about that system. If someone is using VPNS, wouldn't their ID still change? Or is that not how it works?
No. 71132
File: 1708242854514.jpg (23.48 KB, 660x266, farmhandbooboo.JPG)
>>71130kek what, you wanted me to screenshot the error page? The error page with no date that just says "error, ban does not exist?" (or something like that, I don't remember the exact wording). It came up when I hit the appeal button. Anyway I think that's pretty worthless as some sort of evidence since it didn't even have a date on it imo so I didn't take a screenshot, but here it is in my history, even though that's equally worthless since it has no hourly timestamp. Anyway, farmhands can see i'm on the same IP address and if they wanted me banned I would be.
I'm actually seriously going to bed now though because it's very late for me so you'll have to find someone else to go after.
No. 71139
File: 1708260256436.png (351.86 KB, 800x650, banvpns.png)
No. 71141
>>70994Spot on.
>>71137I'm pretty sure I even saw the list of providers/ips that get blocked on 4chan (which includes public proxy websites that people like pakichan abuse) somewhere, github maybe? It would make moderation much easier too.
>>71139This doesn't even make sense, it's bad actors like trannies who depend on vpns. You're also just making yourself more obvious with these autistic meme edits.
No. 71148
File: 1708269679458.jpg (405.07 KB, 1080x1824, 157.jpg)
So mods and even admins do indeed post in the farms without their trip while acting as such. In the midst of the shitshow of this thread I thought the nonnas saying so were being conspiratorial but now I've seen it. Picrel from /ot/.
No. 71156
File: 1708272348632.jpg (7.01 KB, 268x188, tbvhfvbfut.jpg)
Just seen someone tried starting a pick me general thread and that was banned also for having too many crossovers with the infamous tradthot threads. It's really interesting how much seething those threads attract they must have been mentionned in incel circles like 4chan or KF and the posts on there made them seeth so hard they couldn't stay silent. Thoughts?
No. 71158
File: 1708280699747.jpg (157.82 KB, 720x1188, I NEED NAMES NOW NOW NOW.jpg)
Fagmins never disappoints."Unknown egirl" which has been posted in the last thread?? Maybe lurk more yourself retard and in the very thread there are multiple posts with no names yet they remain unbanned? I'm believing more and more these retards mods want their site dead since they've made it annoying for to post anything without getting a ban yet moids can post cp and troons can go calling terfs"retards" and moving popular boards to dead boards yeah real smart people we have here.
No. 71168
>>71167>thinks cerbmin gave a coherent explanation, or even gave one at allApparently they don’t do that anymore before making overarching decisions. We’re in a new era and idk what
triggered it since cerbmin used to be communicative and reasonable.
No. 71169
File: 1708291019665.jpeg (207.3 KB, 770x447, IMG_0509.jpeg)
I hope we get communication from cerbmin today. They still haven’t posted the hellweek stats as promised and the hellweek feedback banner is still up?
No. 71175
Sped in vtuber begging to post porn, replying to themselves and all caps. Either underage or newfag.
>>>/w/ 321122
No. 71176
File: 1708298046055.png (473.8 KB, 1242x2688, IMG_3455.png)
>>71099It’s an IPV6 address, they all follow the same convention, idk where you got that IPs don’t have letters in them unless they’re VPN IPs. This is an example of what an IPV6 might look like: 2001:DB8:1234:0:A1EA:A004:4001:53C8, they all have letters. I also looked up the original IP of the poster and it wasn’t a VPN IP. There’s tons of ways to ban evade that aren’t VPNs so I don’t see why you’re so insistent on this.
No. 71198
>>71196I just think statistics are cool, and since admins themselves said they'd do it I don't see the issue in speculating what they'll include.
>>71197Oh I don't care about timezones/locations, I just think it would be interesting to see if this site gets rowdier at certain times.
No. 71208
File: 1708310507863.jpg (220.64 KB, 1200x800, TheVanLifeTwoWanderingSoles.jp…)
Get in loser, we're going camping.
No. 71210
File: 1708310930438.png (2.65 MB, 1125x942, lil camper.png)
>>71208>>71209It’s camping time
No. 71212
File: 1708312878088.png (277.27 KB, 452x357, smores.png)
>>71208I brought smores nonnies
No. 71218
File: 1708331940901.gif (196.09 KB, 576x152, camping.gif)
I love camping with my nonnies
No. 71221
File: 1708337127045.jpg (52.44 KB, 720x288, Screenshot_20240219_110628_Chr…)
Fire aspie farmhand who doesnt understand jokes. I've seen so many obvious jokes that dont disrupt conversations get unironically red texted. Farmhands red texting banter disrupts more than a little joke does
No. 71227
File: 1708350943102.png (79.73 KB, 738x255, 1000020612.png)
She appeared on live with missing or broken teeth, and confirmed that her "teeth suffered" in a story. How is this speculation, farmhand? Please. They are clearly damaged or gone. I guess it's your decision that no one should comment on how she might have gotten such a traumatic, life-changing injury, but to deny it exists is insane. She confirmed her teeth are fucked.
No. 71232
File: 1708357860409.png (10.21 KB, 1102x43, uglywomenwhotmen.png)
Where is the ugly women with hot men thread? On the ugly men with hot women it says there's a thread about it but I can't find it
No. 71246
File: 1708367549795.png (1.2 MB, 1742x1080, pass the yaoi.png)
>post pakichan in the anti-fujo cows OP
>she stops sperging and derrailing the fandom thread
I am sorry I told that schizo anon that giving attention to attention whores didn't work. It actually worked like a charm and she retreated back to her containment thread.
No. 71275
File: 1708379640226.jpeg (452.55 KB, 1335x1420, 26601816-F929-41C0-AC89-189474…)
Posting my complaint about the bottom two bans here because I can. I was the top anon and was banned because I forgot to sage (I don’t dispute this justification for the ban, I had a retard moment and forgot to sage). However, when I was banned, farmhands initially redtexted it vaguely as “user has been put out to the pasture” instead of specifying what I was banned for (which I’m not criticizing personally, I actually prefer when farmhands don’t put their own little unfunny quips about why an anon was banned). Farmhands also misidentified me as a scrote in their direct message to me regarding the ban, maybe because I was posting from a different IP address than usual (I sort of understand how that looked, from their perspective). But because of the vague ban, nonnas likely assumed that I was just banned for talking shit about trannies, so they posted the edits below that were funny little jests at farmhands. Farmhands then went back and edited the redtext on my post to be more specific about the rules I broke and banned the bottom two anons. I don’t agree with those bans because I think we should be able to post funny little jests, especially when it legitimately does not derail the entire thread. Thank you for your time
No. 71286
>>70981That was me. I knew someone would tinfoil me being trans kek. I thought it was a thread for tinfoiling but apparently only if your tinfoil aligns with the mods political views
>>70982Those other two aren't even me are you okay
No. 71295
File: 1708386864685.png (360.9 KB, 512x512, Z7HeRxU.png)
>>71221I've also noticed this. Wondering if it's a series of mistakes or there really is one legit autist among them.
>>71275Current mod team are trying to revive the glory days and I appreciate that they're trying but some of the moderation is very much picrel.
No. 71363
File: 1708441286294.png (59.52 KB, 1164x456, infighting.png)
>>71362kek are you going to negate how whenever fujos get brought up you call them pornsick and TIFs and you initiate ifighting even though no one was talking about that? here is a tl;dr for admins
>anons talking about cringe fujo trying to sell some shitty academic paper for 40 usd(so making fun of fujos)>anon posts pic rel>infighter instead of ignoring it posts obvious baitit's always the antifujo spergs who initiate infighting
link to the posts
>>>/ot/1894661 anon responding to a post literally making fun of fujos, as a fujo
>>>/ot/1894673 'her' initiating the infight
No. 71364
File: 1708441504660.png (100.61 KB, 1136x672, bait.png)
>>71363and mind you, it was fujos making fun of the fujo academic trying to sell her shitty 3deep5u pappers on BL but 'she' had to jump in and start infighting.
here are more examples of 'she' trying to bait.
>>>/ot/1894691 No. 71366
File: 1708442009245.png (137.93 KB, 2551x639, infighting2.png)
another example of her initiatianing infighting yet again. But nooo its the fujos that 'start shit' even though all of them were actually making fun of other fujos and pakichan had to jump in to start infighiting.
posts
>>>/ot/1894694 post of radfem fujo making fun of tranny fujo
>>>/ot/1894694 'her' initiating the infighting as always.
It's hilarious because fujos were actually laughing at fujo cringe that's related to the topic of thread, but pakichan had to start infighting about how fujos are all pornsick coomers tifs who self insert as the uke blah blah blah.
No. 71367
File: 1708442436201.png (38.26 KB, 2376x303, infighting3.png)
even more examples of this particular user infighting
No. 71409
File: 1708459158018.png (371.64 KB, 1161x1156, really? you retard?.png)
Uh was this supposed to be a satirical redtext on the second one or
No. 71410
File: 1708459208716.jpeg (139.76 KB, 1080x1220, IMG_2580.jpeg)
>>71409The second plane is gonna hit the Lolcow headquarters
No. 71411
File: 1708463267859.png (491.94 KB, 996x735, Screenshot_20240220-130713_(1)…)
Can you retard mods actually do your job right instead of banning any poster you disagree with. Picrel, was in the anime thread on /m/. It's like the moderation team actively want to kill this site.
No. 71425
File: 1708473400998.jpg (80.81 KB, 720x710, Redtext.jpg)
I'm the one who posted this because part of Jill's aesthetic is peeps. I wouldn't have just posted it if the owners were just Jewish but in the pic there were two things about the owners donating to Jewish causes/organizations and the Israeli government giving the owners recognition and the shema yisrael award. Since it never specified that the donations were only to American ones and the Israeli government gave the owners recognition there could be a chance that Jill's cozy wozy peepy weepys donated to Israel/Israeli government. Jill is pretending to boycott places and companies to look good. I get I didn't write this in the post and I'll accept the post getting redtext but can it please have religion baiting instead.
No. 71476
File: 1708525384374.jpeg (232.69 KB, 1170x580, IMG_2602.jpeg)
So…are all vents supposed to be big long paragraphs about how miserable we are now? How dare I vent my joy within a simple statement, right?
No. 71531
>>>/pt/928686>>>/pt/928688>>>/pt/928692These are not off topic, this sheriff was on Hansens stream promising everyone he was going after Onision. The news that came out was important and very related to the topic.
tl;dr shit janny is shit.
No. 71598
>>71589I got banned for making a joke in meta last year, so they only do it when they feel threatened for some weird reason. It was not even a joke against the moderation, it was about some other dipshit posting in meta. I had posted criticism of the moderation earlier though. It was weird since I am otherwise a "good" poster and even did the OPs for several cow threads, including a couple new cows. idk just don't believe what they say, you're not safe in meta.
Movieanon got permabanned because of posting in meta last year and her ban appeal was denied even though a story about "spam" was concocted.
No. 71600
what is the point of having XX hidden if an anon makes a thread in ot and links it
>>>/ot/1894283Some people are so stupid
No. 71614
File: 1708614677612.jpg (290.84 KB, 1400x2100, enough starring jlo.jpg)
I'm fed up with the mommy debate going on in the hellweek stats thread. It's completely derailed the purpose of thread and anons are acting absolutely deranged. Can mods please put an end to it? It's been going on for days now and no one has anything new to add to the conversation.
No. 71629
>>71628>People are allowed to talk about her>She has removed her implantsNone of that was even mentioned.
>(you samefagging yourself) defending, complimenting the cow, and whining about PULL.If you mean
>>>/snow/1968681 That is not me kek Take some serious medication. I've never even used PULL because it was a shit site.
>I believe the rumors on cc that said some cows are mods themselvesWho even cares about Crystal Cafe? Go back home to the scrotes since you seem to lurk there.
No. 71634
>>71627KEK what? Anons were just discussing degeneracy in kpop fandoms, don’t let the word kpop
trigger you so much
No. 71641
File: 1708636781867.png (6.22 KB, 961x77, lolicon pedo admin.png)
welp it's over nonnies, the tinfoils are true. We have a tranny/scrote admin. They just censored anons for discussing a disgusting pedo game with semi realistic loli graphics for 'derailing' in a thread that's for discussing sexism in videogames. So to the troon/moid admin a little girl in a thong is not sexism in videogames and discussing it is derailing, yay! dont you dare speak up against the sexualization of minors because pedo troon scrote admin gets angry his lolis in thongs get criticized
>>>/m/357860 No. 71646
File: 1708637146138.png (357.79 KB, 1353x734, context.png)
more context. dont you dare criticize scrote games with little girls in thongs in the correct thread, that's derrailing!
No. 71647
also funny how they didnt ban the scrote ban evader
>>>/m/357842 who doesnt want women to shit on his precious pedo scrote shit game in the game to talk about sexism in videogames
No. 71663
File: 1708685446939.png (16.97 KB, 425x291, Screenshot 2024-02-23 105047.p…)
kek this is my bye from lolcow. mods are genuinely horrific dictators. there clearly is a moid on the team and thats why we arent allowed the belle thread back. i also love how ive raised good points as to why it should be back and the mods just ignore it.
No. 71677
>>71676Admin made a message that less redtexting was oldmin stuff. More redtexts allow for more transparency in mod actions, also to hold them accountable too. Maybe if anons didn't post redtext worthy shit it wouldn't be a problem.
Also link your examples. No one cares about vague redtexts upsetting a single anon. You can hide the thread kek
No. 71679
>>71676I agree, it is a new feeling to be afraid to make a joke on an
imageboard like is this really the environment the farmhands want? Complete control over what's funny or on-topic? It never seems to matter that farmers complain about the overmoderation or stifling of discussion. Nothing ever changes.
No. 71682
>>71676As
>>71677 has said, we try to redtext more often now a days for greater transparency and accountability (for both the farmers and farmhands). Prior to this, many bans were still being handed out however not redtexted, which made it harder for having open discussions of banning practices. If you ever feel a ban was unjustified, please link them here and we will review and discuss. There's been a recent uptick of some users purposely going into certain threads just to bait/derail to cause unnecessary infighting, and some times unfortunately a few people do catch strays but we remove the bans quickly in those cases. Keep in mind, not all redtexts are the same – We take into account who started the fight, the content, why etc, and some bans are short (less than an hour) or some much longer.
No. 71683
File: 1708718535174.jpeg (103.93 KB, 750x667, IMG_4213.jpeg)
>>71682Ok for the actual genuine derailing, but may I ask if there are any farmhands of spectrum?
No. 71686
>>71682so why havent you adressed this
>>71646 ? why did you choose to side with a schizo who was angry his favourite pedo pandering game was being criticized?
No. 71692
File: 1708720657104.png (39.59 KB, 1820x361, -g-Fetishes-You-re-Ashamed-Of-…)
>>71682NTA and not my bans, but here's one (of many) examples of obvious jokes getting redtexted as "infighting". There wasn't even a fight going on.
>>>/g/379881>>>/g/379884 No. 71702
>>71694It doesn’t seem like infighting to me, they’re joking. We aren’t allowed to make fun of people now without it being infighting?
>>71691No one is allowed to make mean jokes about celebrities in that thread without being accused of baiting, and we aren’t allowed to have disagreements without it being called infighting. It’s sad that we can’t have a trollish sense of humor about dumb celebrities when they deserve to be made fun of and humbled a little bit. on LSA and datalounge they’re allowed to say whatever they want and they’re pretty funny sometimes because of it
>>71685Kek
No. 71724
>>71723NTA I can only assume you are either a farmhand or the world's most miserable person, or perhaps both? If you told me or any other
nonny a year ago that in the future you would not be able to post jokes on lolcow I would have called you a liar, but it seems this is now our reality.
No. 71738
>>71736Due to allowing that though, a lot of those threads have become chatrooms or were chatrooms during those times as well and some of the cows didn't need threads filled with
jokes which just filled it up faster than was even necessary. Even Shayna has no reason to have as many threads as she does. This is in regard to cows though. Old moderation didn't redtext as often, but that doesn't mean those bans weren't there in those threads and you just never visibly for a cue about it.
No. 71744
Need help on this thread
>>>/pt/928152 they keep removing public information, like photographs you can find from public interviews. Can a mod step in? None of this is doxxing. All public information.
No. 71749
File: 1708796396580.jpeg (343.05 KB, 1037x766, IMG_2773.jpeg)
>>71747The red texts are getting more and more troonish/fag esque though. Like since when is a post like this something that would be redtexted? Are the mods suddenly a bunch of gay moids? Why would they take offense to something like this, because it doesn’t really fall under alogging.
No. 71752
someone’s shitting up Lillee Jean’s thread with a faildox
>>71744Kek
No. 71809
>>71801No even earlier than that, like 2018. Using
nonnie for almost 6 years then reverting back to anon is revealing that this is now an explicitly mixed sexed site, meaning anon is now the default, like how male is the default for everything else in life. Yay another website where men yap at each other the exact same opinions you can find all over the internet and think they’re interacting with the girlies. It’s most obvious in weeb threads, the shift in taste and tone.
No. 71812
File: 1708875364962.jpg (69.93 KB, 640x572, t9053e226.jpg)
>>71809>Using nonnie for almost 6 years then reverting back to anon is revealing that this is now an explicitly mixed sexed site, meaning anon is now the default, like how male is the default for everything else in lifewhat a weird jump. you went from point a to x
No. 71813
>>71809While I've used nonna/
nonnie and don't have any problems with the terms, there's something strangely misogynistic in going by the use of cutesy sweet terms as proof of how many women are here. We're a bunch of grown women, we can use regular words. You're also implying that there's a feminine form of "anonymous" which is weird.
No. 71822
>>71790I wish you'd stop responding to me, Retard Gene.
And then I wish that the jannies in the Greg-thread would stop covering for you.
(hi cow) No. 71829
File: 1708892900082.png (689.84 KB, 640x640, fZ71cwl.png)
>>71800I didn't realize the issues this would cause, I understand that variations of "nonna" are not the in the early foundations of LC, again I've been here for a few years, but my issue is the recent usage of anon was rather sudden(and not natural imo) it's like the recent "breeding" posts being posted on every thread, for me it's obvious that there is some not quite right going on.
No. 71841
>>71800You're just mentally retarded and a terminal newfag. Anon has been the most used term for over 8+ years on this site. I don't remember when I first used this site but I'd say by 2015 at least anon was and has been more popular. Nonna,
nonny and other variants were contentious a few years back and gradually became normalised.
No. 71861
why is this post considered bait?
>>>/w/321572ban evading in itself is wrong but it isn't bait. (neither post/ban is mine)
No. 71883
Wrangle the anon trying to infight with anyone trying to discuss venus because they get
triggered anytime someone brings up venus having cptsd (something SHE has said and anyone watching her online could even see due to margo). They camp and throw a fit every time anyone talks about venus and is not outright attacking her. These are discussion threads, not just vendetta threads but she vendettafags definitely live in that thread. No wonder anons get so many bans on /w/, they don't understand how to use threads.
>>>/w/321623 No. 71887
>>71886Spoiled/NSFW labeled posts that involve the child for no reason and aren't NSFW.
>>>/w/321572>>>/w/319377 [with added "anyone else uncomfortable with this" and it's just the kid eating, why would you word it like that and spoil the image? Not even milk or even remotely milky, behind NSFW censors?]
>>>/w/314063I've been noticing this a lot recently and it's so weird and deliberate to do. It's kind of creepy and users already know the kid is never posted with milk.
No. 71894
>>71887nta, but in the past mods would ban posts that included the kid's face. i guess they went back on their rules. i remember there was a hysteria in meta a year or so ago when anons in the thread started asking why the kid should be censored in the first place.
don't be autistic, it's a post of a child with oil and food all over his face. i for one i'm thankful that i don't have to see it every time i scroll because I find it disgusting, nor do i wanna see tom's uglyass face. to each their own, i guess.
No. 71898
>>71894Global rules don't say anything about children being posted when the parent is posting things publicly. However, I have seen anons get banned for being upset about kids being blurred out though which is hilarious, so there is someone in that thread who gets mad when the kid is not spoiled, but censored.
Here are the global rules:
>Do not make threads on subjects under the age of 16.>Do not post identifiable information on minors such as full names, addresses and schools.>Do not post photos of minors where there is an expectation of privacy.
>i for one i'm thankful that i don't have to see it every time i scroll because I find it disgusting, nor do i wanna see tom's uglyass face. to each their own, i guess.There's no point in posting them anyway.
No. 71902
>>71901it's not about posts discussing sex in general, but one specific anon making the same exact posts across several different threads. the OP is suggesting people who reply get banned, not just the anon who makes those posts.
>However administration is too busy policing dumbass shit to worry about things like thiscum-chan literally got banned for it twice so..apparently the staff cares to some degree
No. 71907
Could you look at their post history
>>>/ot/1902291 and tell me if it's a man or a woman?
No. 71917
>>71898That was one anon, who found the kid being scribbled out creepy. Not plural anons. Tom and Taylor are posting his pics to more than half a million people and he's in videos with an even larger audience. There is no expectation of privacy, because of his parents' decisions.
>There's no point in posting them anyway.There's nothing wrong with discussing Tom, he's listed in the OP.
>>71886>highly unlikely it was just an innocent post when Tom isn't even looking at the cameraDo you know where you are? You've said this shit before. wtf is an "innocent post" on this site? Yeah it's a bad photo of Tom. It was posted because it's bad, he looks fat and gross, and anons wonder why someone would post a pic of their partner looking so bad. That's it. Stop moralfagging and samefagging, since you replied to your own post after taking seven minutes to dig up three examples of posts to ree about.
>>71887Posting about cows, especially about ugly perverted moids, isn't a war crime.
No. 71924
the vent baiter is back
>>>/ot/1903138 she's going to cry again for getting banned for posting obvious bait in the wrong thread
No. 71928
File: 1709012611486.jpeg (523.55 KB, 828x1362, IMG_7281.jpeg)
I’m the redtexted post, and the post above it is what I was replying to. What infight? Who am I infighting with? Sarcastically joking that anons aren’t going to like that post is now considered infighting?
No. 71930
>>71929Okay that’s fair. I wasn’t trying to but I can see why it could be taken that way.
>>71924Entire thread is derailed over it
No. 71942
>>71938Everyone knows you're baiting about humble brag crap in a thread not intended for that at all. There are threads about happy things if you are that desperate to
vent. Maybe also look up what venting means. I don't know why you come to meta as if any farmer if on your side unless its you samefagging yourself.
No. 71954
>>71950>>71946Schizophrenia is an ugly disease
>>71940Isn’t it fascinating how not once in that entire paragraph are you able to describe how it would qualify as ‘bait’ and not simply being under what you would consider to be an improper thread? Interesting
No. 71976
>>71974She got banned like a week ago for doing the same thing. Posting in the wrong thread, being told why it's wrong, acting like nobody will tell her why she can't do it and even if it is wrong she will do it anyway, then banned and proceeded to whine about it in here. You can see it right here
>>71476 Tonight the farmhand is absent so she's gone hog wild doing the same exact thing
No. 72010
>>>/ot/1901418 this ban is a misinterpretation of the posting etiquette. they aren't referring to a single post but an entire account with nearly 900 posts that posts homes with a certain décor style. they don't have to post caps for that. it's just over-moderating, not improving discussion.
how many farmhands does /ot/ have? because the moderation is slow and nitpicky or just wrong.
No. 72036
File: 1709051161999.jpg (348.77 KB, 1080x1099, 1000005615.jpg)
>>72033It is enforced but like farmhands have said before, they aren't going to redtext every post some idiot jumping around to different makes. So they might be banned from another thread in /g/.
No. 72041
Anons have been bitching about "over moderation" for years now when it's been the same moderation lol
>>>/ot/255364 saying it's heavy-handed now and not back then also is pretty delusional. new admins, but the mods have been redtexting posts and judging them the same way they are now. We just now have more visible redtexts for transparency instead of just banning someone without everyone knowing. I just say ignore everyone complaining about bans. They most likely just want to bitch and moan because it's fun for them, not because they actually care about posting etiquette.
Figured I'd post this since it's the same complaining now about "over moderation" when it's always been like this. Anons just refuse to post properly and then throw a fit. Or the ones who obviously bait like
>>71957 No. 72046
File: 1709053533084.png (18.1 KB, 1515x134, 154558070.png)
>>72043Samefag finally found it, it was during July last year
No. 72053
>>72051Yeah
why aren't anons posting caps that the links lead to? I don't understand how you're not grasping this.
No. 72056
File: 1709056581641.jpeg (819.17 KB, 1284x1426, IMG_4068.jpeg)
I thought you guys were exaggerating about the vtumor thread attracting newfags but I guess not
No. 72064
>>72032I didn't take it literally, if you're the airt, you wrote
>Also mods just woke upwhich wasn't even true, the ban was issued after I posted it here. But the post was already 7 hours old so I hardly felt bad bringing it to meta, not sure why you have an issue with it or why I'm supposed to know a mod's sleep schedule, we aren't all in the same time zone.
No. 72082
File: 1709090571795.png (97.27 KB, 1749x916, Screenshot_78.png)
so why do posts just vanish sometimes? trying to backread
>>>/m/232318 and there are…gaps
No. 72084
File: 1709090760156.png (87.53 KB, 1474x732, Screenshot (27083).png)
>>72082Click the button in the purple circle, unsaged posts are hidden
No. 72101
File: 1709141654062.jpg (35.12 KB, 737x237, Screenshot_20240228-143446_Chr…)
>>72098Probably to do with this ban on a old dumbass shit thread which isn't autosaged
No. 72135
File: 1709175079497.png (19.9 KB, 1141x273, asdasdasd.png)
this shit is weird. There doesnt go a day i dont see this type of bait here nowadays, it's obviously not genuine.
No. 72137
File: 1709175906607.png (99.68 KB, 2457x343, muh feminism.png)
>>72136that post was made 3 hours after this one in the same thread. There is no way it's not a scrote.
No. 72154
File: 1709189413441.jpeg (123.47 KB, 927x339, IMG_6277.jpeg)
How is this racebait? It’s literally just a fact? Admin must be a smelly hijabi whore.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)
No. 72157
>>72156Nta but grow the fuck up.
>cweepy This imageboard is 18+. Your posts are seen and occasionally replied to.
No. 72162
>>72158You are such a little bitch.
>cweepyYou have to be 18 to post here.
No. 72165
File: 1709198025283.png (406.54 KB, 640x861, muh eighteen .png)
>>72163The AYRT unironically reminded me of picrel. Probably the same one camping here for hours like
>>72156 noticed.
No. 72246
File: 1709213547570.png (385.2 KB, 1400x720, 1663034231270.png)
>>72198I'm in your walls.
No. 72252
>>72196again, why can't these redtexts be posted in the caps thread as usual?
>>72200i only saw this happen one time, guess someone posted in the wrong thread and deleted it or something
No. 72254
>>72252>Why can't these red texts be posted in the established funny caps thread?Newfags are already reposting red text screencaps FROM the
funny screencaps thread in the
retarded bans thread. It's just a bunch of newfags and baiters trying to get a rise out of farmers, the thread is fucking stupid.
No. 72258
File: 1709214655164.png (4.82 KB, 673x98, Untitled.png)
>>72254i agree and there shouldn't be new threads made just to recycle old content. reasons like picrel are not
valid, people need to learn to lurk the old threads. the /ot/ catalog is clogged enough already.
No. 72275
File: 1709217894314.jpg (33.99 KB, 720x631, 7.jpg)
>>72274how long we gonna keep this up
nonny No. 72276
File: 1709218084455.jpeg (364.48 KB, 838x627, IMG_1959.jpeg)
>>72275For me? Thank you for the roses retardchan. I'll put them in a vase of water.
No. 72281
>>72165I’m not trying to be rude to anyone or question your intellect but what does hamburger helper have to do with being opposed to antinatalism?
>>72156I don’t know if you realize this but when you have a tab open in lolcow even if you’re not looking at it you’ll still receive a notice when a new post is made. I didn’t realize there was suddenly anything wrong with responding? It’s ’creepy’ to respond on lolcow now kek? What the fuck is going on
No. 72284
File: 1709222392209.jpg (191.33 KB, 1106x842, mommy issues.jpg)
Here we go again.
No. 72286
>>72284Farmhands, can you please tell anons to wrap up the derailing in
>>>/ot/1825766?
No. 72288
File: 1709224366848.jpg (125.33 KB, 915x642, 1000020963.jpg)
What was the point of lying and saying I'm ban evading? I don't have a ban and it's clear I'm being confused for someone else. This is why bans shouldn't just be carelessly thrown around. It's clear the farmhands can't keep up with who has one or not
No. 72297
Farmer going on a rant about how Venus could solve all her problems by killing herself
Seriously. The fuck is with the anons that post on /w/ and don't even have milk abut a cow, but will a-log them to death over an internet vendetta?
>>>/w/321768 No. 72304
>>72303>mommyposters derail every threadyour own delusion, also clearly projection considering the massive derail you caused in the caps thread today for example
>you must be a mommyposteryour own delusion
No. 72305
>>72303In the thread
>>72286 mentioned, that's just not true. The mommy fighting starts from both sides and both parties have derailed multiple threads over it. Everyone involved is a retard and needs to go outside
No. 72327
File: 1709232896726.png (10.9 KB, 1264x110, Screenshot 2024-02-29 184602.p…)
This isn't the first time I've seen these retards advertise lolcow on a site full of scrotes. And for what fucking reason?
>inb4 someone pretends /blog/ isn't full of moids
No. 72345
File: 1709245929235.png (143.93 KB, 860x268, ok.png)
was this a politically motivated ban? also not that anon and I think it's a retarded comment though I don't understand what rule it was breaking.
No. 72354
>>72351>>72346I'm not either of those anons and never use gioyc. I retardedly thought it was the confession thread when I screencapped. won't make the same mistake again.
>>72352kek some of you are schizo. I've never been banned.
No. 72368
>>72337hasn't this been a problem for a while? idiots on social media calling themselves
femcels and talking about browsing lc. doja cat was rumored to lurk here and referenced this place allegedly too.
No. 72378
>>72374I hope the farmhands pick you,
nonnie!
No. 72387
File: 1709270060190.jpeg (45.88 KB, 602x463, IMG_1975.jpeg)
>>72386I know nonna you're right I know it but I love the farmhands and I feel it deep in my bones that I have to call our heresy and evil bait posts and if I'm crucified for it so be it this is what Jesus felt like on the cross the picrel is me whenever I think about farmhands getting shit on I just have to defend them with my posts if that homeless schizo lady said something about the farmhands I'd throw hands with her too I don't give a fuck if she's homeless I just get so riled up
No. 72388
File: 1709270563309.jpeg (1 MB, 1518x2000, flemish-school-flemish-school-…)
>>72387well now i'm moved by your spirit… i think you might be even braver and stronger then jesus, he never had the guts to fight the homeless
No. 72393
File: 1709276377746.png (218.63 KB, 792x487, 1000021235.png)
schizos shitting up retarded bans thread with pure garbage. I don't want to get banned myself so not replying there and I won't be responding to whatever retarded comments they make here. Spamming "why do you have a screenshot saved" and Latin and Bible verses and "no one cares," while calling every poster "baiter" is not how to deal with an imageboard thread you don't like. Nor is it appropriate to go into a thread and scream about its existence. You hide the thread. I've marked the relevant rules being broken and reported many if not all of the weird posts, because this is just spam. It's so easy to hide a thread.