[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1463930770998.jpg (1.18 MB, 2480x1654, 1463921360382.jpg)

No. 93622

What does lolcow think of modern art? I mostly just think it's bullshit used by the rich to dodge taxes. Is there still any good art around?

No. 93623


No. 93629

Modern art is a pretty wide topic bruh. Nothing you get out of this thread is going to be anything special compared to what is already a we quick Google away.
If you want to see "good" modern art then go look at galleries and blogs. If you want to see modern art "debunked" by angry purist shut-ins then go to /ic/

No. 93630

>>93629
Conceptual art pretty much dominates the "fine arts" scene academically and commercially. You can't really moan, it's traditional artists that are cut off from the mainstream.

No. 93639

>>93622
Wouldn't this pic in really count more as performance art?

No. 93640

>>93623
Yup, this is what I believe.
Look at these douche bags admiring a dirty bed.

No. 93641


No. 93658

>>93639
What's the difference? It's all talenless crap.

No. 93663

My favourite performance. The use of rancid ravioli is genius.

No. 93664

>>93663

What's laughable is that the vast majority of these idiots hail from considerably wealthy, financially secure familial backgrounds. Poor people don't have the time to be pissing around with this kind of bullshit.
Modern 'art' is the hobby of the contemporary bourgeoisie.

No. 93665

>>93664
Art has always been for the rich, regardless of the time period. Poor people can't really take part in most "higher" pursuits, for obvious reasons.

>>93622
>Is there still any good art around?
Yes, but you probably won't come across it often. The concept of "good" has been abandoned since the advent of the romantic and the modern waves. They pretty much brought down traditional forms and standards, and that was over a hundred years ago. IMO all the social movements for equality made matters worse and assured the permanence of this "good and bad are a matter of opinion" free for all. It's already hard to recover lost traditions in the first place (the standards and movements changed over the years, but AFAIK this is the first time they were effectively erased), couple that with the PC paranoia that dismisses all standards as oppression and voilĂ , if you don't think neon letters saying MY VAGINA IS WET WITH FEAR is great art then you're a bigot.


But to be quite honest I find most people who complain about it disgusting. They feel superior for noticing how terrible contemporary art is but have no real background, knowledge, or taste either. That's even more pathetic than sucking a hairy asshole as artistic performance.

No. 93682

>>93663
why is she cutting her jeans…OH GOD NO

No. 93696

File: 1463998967264.jpg (15.27 KB, 300x257, faggotvile.jpg)

>>93622
>modern art
You mean contemporary art. At least do some fucking homework before criticizing something.

No. 93700

>>93665
If a boy says a king is naked, does it makes said boy worse?
Do you, even for a second, consider that people are genuinely disgusted by modern art, and they don't need even to say anything against modern art to be morally superior, because ones who enjoys said art is degenerate by default.

No. 93735

>>93700
It was just a passing comment, why so defensive? You also missed my point.
I'm not defending "modern" (an outdated label I might add) art, I'm not saying it's good, I'm saying your average whiner (correctly) recognizes how bad is it, but doesn't know why good art is good (besides "old paintings were so beautiful why is modern art abstract and ugly!?!!?").

>booohooo the meanies are ruining MUH PRECIOUS ART with their degenerate bullshit :(

No1curr. It doesn't affect most people's lives.
Art is not part of most people's everyday lives, or their social lives, or their professional lives.

You only rage and feel disgust towards the current bad stuff because you have (unquestioningly) put art on a pedestal, as if its value was self evident. It's not. Art is useless. And there is nothing inherently noble and admirable about it either.

No. 93880

>>93622
Most of the time when people talk about "modern" art, they mean contemporary. Modern art was prominent in 1960s- 1970s. Contemporary art we see today is the kind of stuff done for "shock" value, plus a lot of shit performance art which correlates with a lot of shitty and lazy feminist art.

Anyways I just came in here to let you know that you're complaining about the wrong art movement.

No. 93882

>>93880
Who gives a shit? Aside from you.

No. 93888

>>93882
>creates thread complaining about thing
>gets rekt for not even knowing the name of thing you supposedly hate
>OMG, LIKE, WHO CARES

Ok

No. 93901

>>93888
>implying >>93882 is OP

No. 93990

>>93882
Why are u in this thread if u don't give a shit then????!



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]