[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
(For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1709068351692.png (2.48 MB, 2000x2000, M5rtC88.png)

No. 1904259

This thread is dedicated to all and any fandom discourse, particularly that which has a twitter or tumblr flavour to it.

Current topics include, but are not limited to:
> Proshipping vs Antishipping
> Ao3 Censorship and TOS
> Sapphic Underrepresentation in Fandom
> Carrds, DNIs and Call-out Threads
> Whitewashing vs Blackwashing
> ‘[Insert Sexuality]-Coded’ Characters
> Sapphic vs Fujo Misogyny Accusations

Previous thread >>1892891(known baiter inserting bias into OP)

No. 1904261

>>1904259
Did you really have to use the fucking ugly Mr beast pic?

No. 1904272

>>1904259
Yaoi/fujoshi discussion no longer allowed but yumejoshi discussion is? Kek how transparent

No. 1904315

>>1904272
Fujos should be criticized the same way Yumes are.

No. 1904317

>>1904272
You have your entire containment thread to sperg out at.

No. 1904403

>>1904315
That’s what I’m saying. Policing one type of discussion and not the other is dumb when both are relevant to fandoms.

No. 1904405

>>1904272
they should ban both they always take 80% of threads, some of us dont give a fuck!

No. 1904406

>>1904403
Well thank your local schizos for that

No. 1904408

>>1904405
Either both or neither should be banned. Not this selective nonsense

No. 1904410

>>1904405
Agreed, no new ground ever gets covered no matter which thread the arguement is, it's always the same shit flings and it's boring and annoying at this point.

No. 1904411

>>1904406
Not the thread’s fault you retards cant stop biting schizo bait

No. 1904452

Based farmhands

No. 1904464

Didn't the farmhands literally have to tell us to stop fighting about fujos? Why did another farmhand come and redtext op?

No. 1904472

>>1904464
They told you to stop replying to bait and derailing the thread

No. 1904493

File: 1709077117740.jpg (44.23 KB, 750x671, 1535334639792.jpg)

got friend-requested in a gacha game, when I look at their profile they list their age (11!!), location, and discord handle. wtf happened to basic internet safety? I remember larping as a 20 year old man or warrior cat OC online at that age. tbh even if kid-safe spaces like club penguin came back it would be too late. the popularization of discord as the main source for all online socialization opened pandora's box. these kids are all going to get groomed they're doomed

No. 1904502

I would mission impossible style steal a million dollars from a bank to bribe a farmhand into changing the thread pic and I'm not kidding

>>1904493
Parents don't give a fuck and will blame strangers/corps for their incompetence in the future, internet safety is not taught to children nor parents thus severely worsening the problem on both ends, and oversharing is and has been normalized for years. Welcome to hell

No. 1904509

>>1904259
>known baiter
its pakichan isn't it kek, she's so clockable

No. 1904510

>>1904493
Do they not teach basic safety in school anymore? I used to play gacha games and be online when I was that young but I knew better than to put my identity online

No. 1904518

>>1904493
i remember that some online games with chat, including club penguin, even banned numbers from being mentioned so you couldnt tell your age or other information. it seems like spaces for older kids to preteens are ending, theres no tween demographic anymore, toys and kids shows target toddlers and social media is replacing the need for them.

No. 1904523

>>1904493
all gachas should be 18+ honestly

No. 1904538

>>1904523
It's weird too, cause esrb should be rating gacha games and games with gambling mechanics using real money as AO rating, but I guess gacha games keep lobbying or something.

No. 1904561

>>1904493
Kids as old as 7 are playing gacha which quite frankly sounds gross as hell. We played roblox at that age but now everyone else roblox want the slice of that genshin pie. Credit cards get dispensed, kids get groomed, and no one wins in the end. Oh, and little jimmy wants his dick gone because he's a girl now.

We laughed at horse armor. We made fun of disc dlc and now every single game can't go two steps without shoving truckload of microtransactions down our throats. it should be illegal yet here we are…

No. 1904565

File: 1709081673292.jpg (15.68 KB, 262x275, 1705255260681.jpg)

>>1904493
back in my old days, the "a/s/l" was a quite dangerous question, so you had to lie over it.

>>1904523
>>1904523
Specially when minors ignore that some stuff are obtained with real money without their parents permission.

No. 1904566

File: 1709081776115.jpeg (125.58 KB, 570x415, DB5DBF8B-A1BC-4E30-8BFB-D1A646…)

>>1904561
>we played Roblox at that age
Speak for yourself, I was playing on the Diva Starz website at that age

No. 1904567

>>1904561
7 is old to be playing Gacha? And who plays Roblox at 7? When I was 7 I played ClueFinders and with toys.

No. 1904571

>>1904566
Omg this just made memories flood back to me, I had the Nikki talking doll as a kid!! I haven’t thought about it in 20 years, it was the talking doll with the really heavy feet lol and the snap on clothes. It’s like I can feel myself clicking the cell phone onto her hand kek.

No. 1904579

>>1904567
I think nonna meant "as young as 7." And I also mostly played with toys at that age, but sometimes I was allowed to play on the family computer and roblox, club penguin, and barbiegirlsdotcom was my go to.

No. 1904582

>>1904566
This website was the shit. Endless hours of fun for me

No. 1904595

>>1904561
When I was 7 I didn't even have internet access, I had a Gameboy and played with Pokemon toys. Kids shouldn't even play online games until they're at least 16, and nothing with microtransactions until 18.

No. 1904596

Sorry for the retarded question but did the mods delete the baiting bias in the op? Cuz now it's the same as the old one.

No. 1904600


No. 1904614

Apparently people are selling fanfics?
It never ceases to amaze me how capitalistic tumblr adjacent fandom is despite the communist rhetoric in those spaces

No. 1904620

File: 1709085234990.jpg (450.32 KB, 2894x4093, garoppui-1552276765250183168-2…)

sagging for retarded vent
>join discord art server
>i mostly draw husbandos with guns and military outfits
>start posting my art
>''ummm can you add tw for guns it makes me uncomfy'' ''ummm very problematic you are glorifying war did you know people die in war''
>leave

Why are female spaces so retarded? specially since that server is filled to the brim of women glorifying ''problematic'' stuff like lore olympus crypto-ddlg shit, old man yaoi, etc. And no, before anyone says i was in the wrong, i was not posting husbandos in nazi uniforms or even uniforms with political attachment it was more like pic rel. I find it funny they are ok with everything else but draw the line at the most common male stripper costume. I had such high hopes for that server since it seemed to have a high bar quality where they didnt anyone with mspaint tier skills in.

No. 1904622

>>1904614
I've seen some CN authors who sold their fanfics with lovely covers and binding and partnered with artists who provide illustrations to go along with the text. tbh I wouldn't have minded buying physical copies of fanfics like that. It may actually look nice on a bookshelf (assuming no guest tries to flip through it kek).

No. 1904627

>>1904614
god, a fanfic writer I occasionally read the stuff of recently took down a bunch of her fics that were just on ao3 normally and shoved them behind a paywall. What the fuck. It was even more strange to me because while plenty of her stuff is fun to read, it's basically all ooc au shit, like if you wanted to make money on your writing you can just write things that aren't fanfiction. This writer in particular could've done as little as change the names to monetize them, but no, they're still fanfics behind the paywall. I'm fine with something like fanfic commissions though

No. 1904634

File: 1709086337753.jpeg (2.82 MB, 4096x3761, homestuck.jpeg)

stolen from the bad art thread but this is hilarious and a little bit sad at the same time. i know it has been talked in the past threads that fandom nowadays focuses more on the checkboxes a character might fit in over the characters actual value, but something about the obsession with illnesses disturbs me, see daphne posing with the pill bottle for example. ive seen young teens make their whole carrds about how many totes real illnesses they have, as if it matters in online spaces?
also theres the other thing about remaking already existing popular characters, you could argue that they rather take characters people know over making ocs but you know this kind of art isnt the one getting liked and shared so its not like it changes a whole lot.

No. 1904636

>>1904620
I'm sorry nona, it's really irritating how virtue signal-y female spaces are online, especially ones infested with TIFs. Your art sounds super cool though and I'm sure for every person crying about muh trigger warnings theres a larger number of people who think your art is neat

No. 1904639

>>1904634
>open queerplatonic relationship
2024 where having more than one friend is considered a polyamorous sexuality kek

No. 1904646

>>1904614
What happened to getting a JOB instead of monetising your damn hobbies

No. 1904649

>>1904634
Lol Velma dating herself cause author/artist was copy-pasting from Daphne's description

No. 1904653

>>1904634
I think zoomers are incapable of good character design

No. 1904655

>>1904620
it's really sad honestly but also what's the name of the server kek

No. 1904657

>>1904655
It's a closed server of a mutual from twitter. That's why i even joined in, i though it was going to be more ''professional'', but it's no different from any other server.

No. 1904664

i do not care about genshit impact but the treatment of arlecchino pisses me off. cool gnc woman? we are GOING to draw her in skimpy champagne dresses and feminize her

No. 1904669

>>1904664
That and the onslaught of tranny headcanons. Arlecchino isn't even GNC in the first place, her design just isn't overly feminine moeblob shit like the rest of Genshit's cast. But of course if a female character is slightly masculine fandom will immediately pump out "you can be masc and wear dresses and makeup" "transbian kween" "he/him tmasc butch slay" retardation because simply being a masculine woman isn't woke enough anymore.

No. 1904671

>>1904509
My bet is the twitter zoomer.

No. 1904679

File: 1709089599345.jpg (142.48 KB, 1080x1242, 1584116150241.jpg)

>>1904664
I am so tired of cool female characters getting trooned out. I was in the admitelly cringe as fuck tangled: the series fandom and the amount of retarded tranny headcanons surrounding cass was exhausting.

No. 1904743

>>1904634
It's weird seeing character descriptions that focus heavily on medical/psychiatric conditions as if they were character traits, since I interacted with some younger zoomers recently (I should probably stop going to lolita meetups) who pretty much led with their diagnoses and medications when introducing themselves. I could not fathom introducing myself that way. I wondered if it was related to fandom culture, like if they identify with characters someone slapped labels of "audhd" and "fibromyalgia" onto. Is it a type of activism? Do they think having diabetes is intrinsic to their personality? They're also like this with sexuality and gender identity. Is it just how some young people relate to the world now, connecting to other people and fictional characters by their genders and illnesses?

No. 1904744

>>1904634
kek one thing I always find funny about these kinds of scooby doo redesigns is that they never include the damn dog- I've seen him get converted into a guide/emotional support dog a couple of times, but usually he's just absent (I see this with other properties too where the non-human or more difficult to draw/warp main characters are absent from the redesign line-up). Wonder why there is a bit of a fixation on these characters in general tbh, never really knew anyone who was super into the shows when I was a kid, yet I've seen a fair few things like this even before the Velma show rekindled some discussion on it.

And yeah it is kinda sad and disturbing that there's such a fixation on illnesses as a character trait or core aspect of a person's online identity. I know it was all the emo rage to have OCs with like self-harm scars and such when I was a kid, but that was for the angst, not uwu quirky rep shit

No. 1904779

File: 1709094615920.png (141.88 KB, 710x474, image_2024-02-28_152548935.png)

>>1904634
As someone who grew up on classic Scooby and Mystery Incorporated it's so obvious that they barely know the characters beyond the basics and the illnesses and genderism is attempting to hide that.
>>1904743
As someone who regularly (not by choice) interacts with this type of zoomer they do geniunely think like that, the more labels you have the more interesting you are and how it can be a stand-in for a fully formed personality.
>>1904744
I think from the outset the characters seem really two dimesional personality-wise while having simple and recognisable traits, thus being easy to project a lot of things on them.

No. 1904781

>>1904679
damm, I thought I was the only one who shipped these two

No. 1904787

>>1904743
Honestly, I think it could have something to do with the efforts made to destigmatize mental and physical illnesses. In the past, I'm pretty sure people would usually not talk about things like illnesses openly. I guess with people more comfortable talking about things like this, some people are now treating illnesses like some personality trait.

No. 1904795

>>1904781
varian and cass is my OTP and i am still salty varian wanst present through the entirity of season 2

No. 1904800

>>1904743
Zoomie disable headcanon fanart is going to age as bad as that fat albert retard episode or the aids episode from captain planet. Inclusion for the sake of moralfagging is always so hilariously transparent and stupid.

No. 1904804

>>1904743
>>1904634
There's a whole other discussion about how many see disabilities as aspects of identities that if "fixed" would consider it a form of erasure, like I think the vast majority of people in wheelchairs would probably like to be able to walk again.

No. 1904808

File: 1709097392345.jpeg (40 KB, 580x290, C53E6C36-024F-46A2-9B35-766977…)

>>1904744
the scooby doo gang is very recognizable and iconic, nearly everyone knows who they are, and they're designed pretty well, with obvious personalities and such. i think they're an easy target for redesigns since they have been changed over the years to fit different eras and audiences, so it isn't anything new- they're a bit timeless, honestly. so since they're all white, able-bodied or whatever, ect., so this is what modernizing them is to zoomers/millennials. its sort of an easy way to practice character design since they have a relatively solid base.

it is kinda funny they have an issue with their races all being white when they were designed by a japanese-american man, and their races only began to get changed in different medias after his passing.

No. 1904810

>>1904800
difference is that theyre trying to represent a group they think theyre part of. guarantee artist has self-dia like half of these

No. 1904826

>>1904744
I think the more "iconic" a character is and the more people casually know about them without getting into the media the more butchered and projected on they get. It's the combination of being a fake fan and instant recognizability with only a few traits that makes sjw artists believe they can change everything about the character except their clothes or an accessory and they will still be "themselves" or recognizable enough.

You see this shit a lot with Sailor Moon, Hatsune Miku, Princess Peach. When it's done with characters less ingrained in pop culture that's when you get the "who is this supposed to be" guessing game you see often in the bad art threads so people interact less with it, not recognizing the character. That's why these people constantly gravitate towards the same ones. The attention.

No. 1904831

>>1904620
Female spaces suck so much now. They're usually anti terf and pro tranny. I had to unfollow a few people on social media because they all changed their pfp to the Palestine flag. I hate how sensitive these women are. I think you art and hobby is probably amazing. It sucks what has happened to female spaces on the internet, leaking into real life

No. 1904869

Someone said on another thread that homestuck creator met his current wife when she was 16 and he was 38, is that fucking true? if so how come he didnt get cancel over it

No. 1904876

File: 1709106339299.png (2.51 MB, 2048x1683, GACgtQiXEAAVhri.png)

>>1904259
why did they make tranny bully fanart, i hate twitter so much

No. 1904881

>>1904876
is that supposed to be jimmy and petey?

No. 1904893

>>1904876
kek the bisexual wrist band

No. 1904936

File: 1709112540260.jpg (352.97 KB, 659x1452, no respect.jpg)

>>1904869
You know why kek it's a man and homestuck is already known as Bad so it doesn't matter what the creator did or didn't do. All the fans only like it "ironically" or they have their own fixed version that's soo much better.

That reminds me of the Captain Howdie callout doc though, all of it was such a reach. I can't believe posting something about a memorial between random posts was enough to be an offense in 2022 considering how zoomers treat current events now.

No. 1904943

>>1904936
This is the exact kind of petty "bitch eating crackers" teenage drama I witnessed in high school, I absolutely hate how it's transferred to online spaces to affect everyone even from age 18 and up.

No. 1904949

>>1904943
Kek considering most of the people upset with Howdie were literal 14-18 year olds it makes sense. Maybe they'll grow out of it. I guess Homestuck has an advantage in that regard because it came out in the early 2010s when no one gave a fuck about problematic behaviours, then it became cringe in everyone's eyes and now no one cares anymore

No. 1904978

File: 1709115781494.jpg (64.15 KB, 644x714, 0083RyIhly1h6wirb4m1tj30hw0ju7…)

>>1904664
>>1904669
what pisses me off is that even "progressives" who were asking for more gnc women will turn around and draw arlecchino in drag queen makeup complete with that ridiculous skimpy undersuit (fuck hyv for giving her that btw). in fact, it's not enough to uberfemme her in fanart, they'll even beg for the coomer moidgaze outfit to be part of her stance change in official fucking gameplay. i'm a huge arlecchinofag but man do i despise so much of her "fans".

No. 1904994

>>1904620
Now you have to larp as male to do anything fun online. We had such a short sliver of female only geek spaces, why does God hate us?

No. 1904997

>>1904669
Who knew GNC female characters from the 80s/90s would be the best we will ever see in our lifetimes?

No. 1904998

>>1904978
Calling Arlecchino "GNC" is such a reach to begin with, the bar for "gender-nonconformity" is on the floor when someone wearing a tube sock with huge boobs and a curve-fitting pantsuit vacuumed to her body and walking around in stiletto heels is considered one. With the same logic you could be calling Jean "GNC", they essentially wear the same outfit. Genshin waifufags really out there settling for crumbs and I say this as a Genshinfag myself.

No. 1905007

>>1904595
Mostly flash games here especially dress up. I only touched mmos way later when I was like 12 or 14.

No. 1905036

File: 1709122790862.jpg (832.05 KB, 849x1200, Fg1kO9rUAAABIfl.jpg)

>>1904998
i believe the perception is a holdover from lazzo. back then we thought she had short hair, and reputable leakers were saying hoyo's internal design philosophy for her was that of a "handsome woman" (i believe they weren't bullshitting, it's just that hoyo's definition of the word is…skewed, and resulted in mistakes that never should've happened such as the rattail, the undersuit, and the stilettos). picrel of fanart from back then that might help showcase the initial perception, contrast this to some of the slop you'll see nowadays thanks to both the fandom coomers and hyv's own shitty design choices in regards to her. i just wish arle was allowed to be a proper handsome woman, but i'll quit rambling for now. see you in the genshit thread nonna.

No. 1905079

>>1904994
This shit is so sad, I used to have a group of spergy girl friends in the early 10s (the Homestuck days kek) and as we got older and zoomers started making up the majority of fandom spaces it got infested with sjws, tifs and troons. Even if it went against their beliefs deep down, my friends started sucking up to them and the fandom became a cancel culture shitfest. I'm very blackpilled about online female spaces ever since because they're always full of slacktivism of current thing and the ugliest minority pandering art.

Ironically irl it's moids for me who are insufferable and my girl friends are cool, don't know what the deal is with terminally online girls and gendie shit/politics

No. 1905104

Maybe this is more Reddit hate than fandom salt but it's close enough. fucking hell can I discuss my gacha fave without some fat unwashed neckbeard who pisses in jars replying to me about how my fave will get shot in the head if the developers mention him again? Why is alogging allowed on Reddit? Why do these incels think women will finally pay attention to them if gacha bishie #69420 gets killed off in the game's story? Bro wash your goddamn ass and do not breathe in my direction physically or digitally ever again.

No. 1905118

>>1904646
I don’t have a problem with monetising hobbies but there’s something really sleazy about monetising fanfics for some reason

No. 1905134

File: 1709134228315.png (598.01 KB, 653x479, yea sure a spectrum nona.PNG)

Just no words. I got nothing.besides most "ace" people being some form of mental illness, pornsickness, or both. Long before I peaked, I gave most asexuals the benefit of the doubt until the coomers came in and ruined it for everyone…

No. 1905135

>>1904261
next anon who creates the thread op with mr. beast tranny fanart needs a permaban. I don’t care if it’s ironic, my fucking eyes

No. 1905158

>>1905134
I think that this way of thinking partially comes about because societally there’s a really poor understanding of how men’s and women’s experiences of sexual attraction are different. People will act as if men and women are the same in this aspect to sound progressive (not that conservatives have the right idea either) but really it’s just taking men’s experiences as default. Women see this and then believe they are outside of the norm for not feeling the strong physical attraction that comes with having a testosterone addled brain.

No. 1905175

>>1905134
I mean, it makes sense, those "ace" people have fried their brain so much with porn and hentai they are unable to be attracted to real sex and people, therefore they are asexual!

No. 1905176

>>1905175
>I mean, it makes sense, those "ace" people have fried their brain so much with porn and hentai they are unable to be attracted to real sex and people, therefore they are asexual!
That's called escalation, it's how most fetishes and perversions develop.

No. 1905238

>>1905158
Don't get me started on demisexuals. It's valid to feel horny after knowing someone for a month? Like what? isn't that…normal? Knew someone who ID'd as Ace for like a year before realizing she's lesbian and didn't know it because her frame of reference was almost always men. People often forget humans are biological creatures, where our basal mechanisms are predicated on survival and propagation. Women being horny once a month is natural and co-assigns with men's own sexual cycle. You know why female sex criminals are rarer? socialization and biology.

We will never be as depraved as men, and probably never will. This leads to fandoms getting infested by "aroace" gendies who swear top and down they're hella queer yet often fall into same trad thinking like any bargain bin conservative. Oh, but they're ace,you see, sex is just icky-wucky for them. No, screw that. They're mentally ill, or worse, traumatized from years of sexual abuse. What they need is help. Better yet, take a break from the internet. 

No. 1905240

>>1905158
Most of these “ace” people online are teenagers and kids, I didn’t really develop any true romantic or sexual feelings for anyone until I was around 16ish and I still have no had a crush on anyone because no one around me is that worth it kek. It’s completely normal for an 11-15 year old to not be interested in romance and sex, porn and the need to always have a queer label has fried these kids brains. They can’t see what’s wrong with having not completely developed mentally but still drawing and writing hardcore fetish porn because they’ve been addicted to it since they’ve been 9.

No. 1905252

>>1905134
I feel like a lot of people, both on the young end and those in their 20s (or even 30s), have a really warped idea of romance and sex due, in part, to media on a very basic level– I'm not even talking about degeneracy or fetishes, just the baseline expectations more and more people seem to have to these two aspects of life. Like, a lot of people think that if they're not like the people in the movies they watch or the books they read etc by not being constantly horny/insta-love or immediately falling for someone/fucking like rabbits, then they mustn't be normal and have to be some special other thing. It's fine to not constantly be dating or in love or hooking up with someone if you're not interested in it, or if other things in your life make that unappealing to just jump into. Passion is good and all, in life and fiction, but relationships and sex can take time (they are risky and intimate, after all) and somehow these people haven't gotten that message. Idk sorry for the ramble, these people just often speak like aliens or have wild assumptions on how everyone else operates kek, had to deal with so many of them at uni.

Then yeah, there's the smut brainrot playing its part, and I've also seen some use it as a shield to avoid being called a slut or associated with the term because they're a horny woman and that's not allowed. The unfortunate people who are like this because of trauma really should be addressing their issues instead of covering them up with ace/demi labels.

No. 1905264

>>1905252
What you said is definitely true for my case. I don't think I was anything too extreme, but I was into some cringy DDLG shit. but when I had a personal revelation about it, I realized that I needed to give it up and seek healthier romantic options. Eventually, I learned to let go of it all together.

No. 1905316

>>1905252
I knew one or two who saw romance as a trade offer and not an attempt to spend their lives with somebody. Don't they like this person? I don't see a guy on the road and think he'd make a great business partner. 

I think media as a whole stinks at conveying romance organically, so kids grow up harboring these views until they end up in relationships. People are complex, messy bundles of chaos. Being friends with actual people is more than enough to signal that life doesn't function that way. But since this generation grew up online, media is all they know and operate with. Miyazaki is a scrote, but his "anime is a mistake" speech really opened my eyes to the amount of incest going on in media. Not just in anime, but in video games, manga, live action, and animation. It's everywhere because no one touches grass anymore, or at least the creatives aren't. 

No. 1905317

>>1904978
it just proves to me that they're all faux lesbians. a real lesbian would enjoy her for being GNC not turned into a sex doll

No. 1905323

>>1905317
They are most than likely straight women who are enbies doing this shit too. ugh

No. 1905357

File: 1709148554643.jpg (110.37 KB, 503x509, 1709134444746.jpg)

I sort of knew this was going to happen, despite conservative retards complaining about "muh SJWs". The reason those "SJW" were even hired in the first place is because its way cheaper, as they lacked union quality. However, as soon an even cheaper option presents itself, the soulless media company would take it.

No. 1905368

>>1905323
if it's not that, they simp for the most butchest women alive. No inbetweens.
>>1905357
Aren't some of these "sjw" troons and troon enablers inserting their bull into anime? not a fan of AI but it's hilarious companies never cared for "woke" politics when money was always the bottomline.

No. 1905376

>>1905357
The future is so bleak. I hope their first attempts fail badly and people complain enough to make them stop. What is the end goal of all this, at some point everything is going to be soulless AI generated garbage and no one will be able or wanting to pay for it so the large profit margins won't even matter

No. 1905383

File: 1709149601218.png (716.49 KB, 637x635, Screenshot 2024-02-28 at 2.49.…)

>>1904614
There's a whole amateur fanfic/book binding community out there that prints and binds fanfiction but it's strictly for personal use and they don't sell it/can't offer commissions (picrel is a handbound reylo fanfic). The problem with this is that there are printers on various websites and etsy who are printing and selling popular fics that have been printed on demand and dumbasses on tiktok are promoting these places rather than learning a new skill or just printing it off themselves and putting it in a binder.

There was also a whole incident in the summer? where these fanfic binders decided to hold a charity auction selling off their binds of different fanfics which didn't go over well either. Not only did they not get permission from the authors, it started getting crazy in that some binds were being auctioned off for thousands of dollars because they were done by popular fan binders. I can understand why the authors who are inadvertently involved in these situations want to delete or put their shit behind paywalls. Why should others massively profit off of their work when they don't see a dime? It sucks that greedy ass people have to ruin hobbies like this

No. 1905396

>>1905383
fanbinding also popped off on tiktok which really hasnt helped matters. I know the author of the most popular dramione fic on ao3 Manacled is pulling it to republish as an original story because of people selling fanbinds. In general Dramione fic is a big one for this community due to the massive popularity of villain love / enemies to lovers in romantic fiction right now.

No. 1905408

>>1905368
even calling it "simping for the butchest woman alive" is a generous interpretation when they basically just draw a barafag-tier roided male body and then slap a woman's face on it. that kind of art always ends up looking so uncanny too. there's a clear difference between a muscled butch woman and a man, but i guess i shouldn't expect those totes qweer tifs to know that.

No. 1905452

>>1905383
That's so insane, I've never heard about that before. Crazy how people always manage to find new ways to profit off of people who do stuff for fun and share it for free

No. 1905454

>>1904614
It's pretty common in the doujinshi scene (especially with yumejo fanbases), it's not really different from doujin artbooks and mangas, but restricting it behind a patreon I'd taking it too far imo.

No. 1905457

>>1905134
None of these people are asexual, they're just too deep into their 2D coomery. Not that women are as bad as men but the PWP writing asexuals are the female equivalent of fat neckbeards who gave up on irl women and jerk off to anime girls all day. The fact that being queer is big in fandom spaces also pushes them to pick up any microidentity they can so they're not boring oppressive cishets. You don't see the coomer men identifying as aroace en masse because they don't care about LGBTQIA label shit.

No. 1905474

>>1905357
If it gets good enough to the point it works almost flawlessly, people will just use it themselves once someone makes an open source version instead of paying for a service that does the same thing.

No. 1905495

>>1904634
I'm late to the party but I blame this on an accumulation of "Daphne and Velma are lesbians and dating" memes that were floating around the past few years, the memes about the Scooby-Doo movie being originally a porno making people go "haha porn funny" and wanting to make sexual content of the characters, the director of mystery incorporated posting a pride edit of Velma and Marcie on his insta on pride month a few years ago fueling the "Vemla is a lesbian with combhet!" headcanons, the Velma show racebendind Velma and Daphne and making them lesbians was the last piece of the puzzle for this to happen. The people who make this kind of "art" wanted to get rid of Fred and Shaggy as love interests for each of the girls somehow but didn't want to erase them because they -the artists- themselves are straight and love these two basic white boys, so they gotta make them ~speshul~ to get to like them without getting shit for it, and boom you've got lesbian genderqueer mixed disabled autistic chronically ill Fred and Shaggy.

No. 1905506

>>1904634
>Private school kid trauma
That's a funny way of saying that you were a rich kid.
Also why Scooby Doo? It's a shitty kid's franchise that basically prides itself on being as cheap and repetitive as possible.

No. 1905536

>>1905454
I think a key difference is that doujins in Japanese spaces cost very little (I assume because of copyright reasons). Some of these fanfiction binded books are being sold for hundreds of dollars.

No. 1905568

>>1905536
>I assume because of copyright reasons
I think it's also because printing stuff in your closest conbini is pretty cheap. Meanwhile I keep seeing American and European artists complaining about costs for prints and about how a short comic would take more time to make and would cost a lot more to print for cons. The only novels I see sold by independent writers in artist alleys are always original stuff, never fanfics. I think legit the only times I heard about fanfics being printed and sold was when I learned about the early days of the Stark Trek fandom in the US, decades ago when the internet wasn't widespread for personal use at all.

No. 1905571

>>1905568
if only ink wasn't so expensive, i'd be printing like crazy

No. 1905643

>>1905568
From looking into the cost of printing a book, a single copy of a book can cost from $3-$10 (comics are in a similar price range). And obviously in bulk it'd cost up to hundreds of dollars, but then maybe it's even cheaper to print in Japan. Also I'm pretty copyright reasons are the reason that people at cons usually only sell original writings (fanart and prints of art are a legal gray area I think).

No. 1905649

>>1905357
i am honestly really happy that AI is failing. The other day i found some guy on twitter with admitedly decent AI art, but he barely had 10 likes kek. I just bookmarked the generations that had nice colors and continued looking for real artists. Fuck AI shit.

No. 1905651

>>1905134
why cant these people just be based misandrist yumefujos.

No. 1905778

>>1905134
>>1905651
Honestly so much of these "acespec" label kids are just normal people who have aversion to men but can't admit it because muh sexism. I hope misandry becomes mainstream so fucking bad.

>>1905175
This happens too but thats for male "asexuals".

No. 1905789

>>1905368
Man is when masculine. Woman is when feminine.

No. 1905855

>>1905568
I live in japan and am actually preparing for a fan event atm, there are whole printing companies that specialize in doujin printing, so like 10 copies at 20 A5 pages in monochrome starting at like ~9000 yen, and then people usually sell them for 500-1000 yen each. Idk what printing costs are in the US compared to that, but I guess Japanese fanartists will usually do just one new book per event and then sell off the old extras alongside it.

No. 1905945

>>1905778
>This happens too but thats for male "asexuals".
they most identify as queer though, these days.

No. 1905946

>>1905855
>>1905568
Not to "thing. Japan," but I get so jealous of how passionate Japanese fan communities are compared to western fans. I feel like tons of western fans, particularly artists, care way more about Twitter clout than the actual work they draw art of. I scroll Japanese works for a fairly unpopular manga I like and I still see tons of multipage fancomics and people churning out nonstop fanart for their otp and other high-effort fanworks. coming out, but when I look to western sides of fandom I feel like its mostly just shit like meme redraws or ooc troonshit, and high-effort fanart is a one-off by random pro illustrators. I'm not even saying Japanese artists are more talented, I wade through tons of shitty looking JP fanworks, but I feel like I see way more low-skill JP artists trying to make a sincere effort to draw the things they love, while so much western fancontent feels filtered by a layer of irony.

No. 1905948

>>1905946
>meme redraws
i hate this so much. I will take a million cat and food pics over this

No. 1905981

File: 1709187877057.png (691.36 KB, 1000x1566, jWCOXQf.png)

>>1905948
I think they can be funny if it's something really goofy, but when it's either fetish or coom bait like picrel, then It's beyond cringe.

No. 1905982

File: 1709187952097.png (2.05 MB, 1080x2160, hP8rPQT.png)

>>1905981
mind you, this is what the character actually looks like.

No. 1905983

>>1905981
>I think they can be funny if it's something really goofy
i hate zoomer humor so i find all of them painfully funny, they are also drawn very poorly

No. 1905987

>>1905982
She's cute but where are the muscles? Still looking for them. I'm not getting over the bs going in the Genshin fandom and how assmad fans were because of the "bad representation" from her and the other characters released at the same time. I'm glad I never touched that game before and never will because I don't want to see kids whining that this character isn't an accurate representation of an Algerian woman because of her clothes, like do these tard think Algerian women are cat girls? A friend of mine deleted her save in protest, meanwhile I'm Algerian and just found it amusing.

No. 1905989

>>1905946
Yeah, youre definitely right. In the fandom I'm in, I follow a lot of women who are wholesomely schizo obsessed with their favorite (female) characters, and they just make whatever kind of merch like keychains or wall scrolls on a whim because they personally wanted them, and then share the love with other fans by selling extras. There are some girls who cosplay their favorite character and i see them on twitter always just hanging out together in cosplay and having a fun time together playing games, and when I met them in person at a fan event they were just super sweet and hyper excited to talk together with me about their passion despite only just meeting. They were selling a 40 dollar ~50 page cosplay book that was basically their nerdy paragraph rants about the character, as well as irl location photography related to the character that they had personally mapped out and visited, and handwritten details about their self made cosplays. Everything is focused on the love for the source material and the fans' deeply personal connection to it. Nobody is sperging over sexualities or policing other peoples personal interpretations even if theyre super out of character. Western fans could never.
There are definitely issues with Japanese fandom such as artists amassing small fan cults or going insane and wiping their accounts, but nothing compares to the absolute mental illness of western fandoms that I see, and I pray every day that the bullshit of the latter doesnt infect other places.

No. 1905991

>>1905989
Not to sound like a weeb, but i wish i lived in japan. Although i am from a shithole country so even America would be a step up from my country.

No. 1905997

>>1905989
That doesn't sound healthy tbh.

No. 1906001

>>1905997
Probably not, no, but compared to becoming a housewife to a conservative east asian scrote and popping out 3 kids by 27, I won't shit on women for being schizo nerdy if theyre making use of a good work ethic, using a creative outlet, and fostering healthy friendships with fellow women.

No. 1906006

>>1906001
I mean there can be a balance between living in reality and not being some meek housewife, also most east asian women don't have anywhere that many kids.

No. 1906010

>>1905997
>>1906001
NTA but some of female Japanese fans on Twitter I follow tweet about stuff like their kids or husbands pretty often, sandwiched in betweenposts about their otps or fanart they drew themselves. I obsessively pump out fanart while maintaining a full time job and irl relationships too. I think a lot of online fans have totally mundane normal IRL lives and just do fan stuff as escapism, not everyone is a turboneet. Working women and mothers need the escapism the most honestly lol

No. 1906014

>>1906001
I say this as someone who never wants to marry and have kids, that's an extremely limited duality. Go offline for a bit.

No. 1906026

>>1905997
>having fun isnt healthy
the fuck anon is talking about women who touch grass despite having autistic hobbies how is that a bad thing

No. 1906032

>>1905983
I hope you're light skinned, thin, and conventionally attractive to east asian standards, or else it's gonna be hell for you, nona.

t. also from a shithole country.

No. 1906040

>>1906026
I feel I shouldn't have to explain why
>schizo obsessed with their favorite (female) characters, and they just make whatever kind of merch like keychains or wall scrolls on a whim because they personally wanted them
isn't healthy behavior.

No. 1906051

>>1906040
I still don't understand how that's a bad thing. Are people supposed to be soulless drones who only obsess over work? it's really cute she liked something that much and that it inspires her to make art.

No. 1906054

>>1906051
That's not what she said, don't be obtuse.

No. 1906061

>>1906054
I genuinely dont get it kek what's wrong with it. It's better than obsessing over a nigel.

No. 1906071

>>1906061
First of all, get off lolcow. There's so many women who doesn't exist in tradthot cringe thread and yumefujo cringe thread extremities. You don't have to pick one or the other. I can't believe I have to spell it out: It's not normal to be schizo.

No. 1906073

>>1906071
no offense but how do people like you end up on lolcow in the first place

No. 1906074

>>1906071
I am pretty sure anon meant schizo in a dedicated way and not literally schizo, although you could technically call normies schizos. How many scrotes obsess over sports teams and normie women obsess over taylor swift and other retarded celebrities.

No. 1906083

File: 1709193897880.png (16.68 KB, 300x300, FRPMb6zWYAE5cWz.png)

>>1906073
Because I grew out of ic, earn money, occasionally touch grass and are also in fandom and art spaces.

>>1906074
Kek to me a schizo fan would be something like snapewives or final fantasy house, or St Catherine of Siena.

No. 1906086

>>1906074
>How many scrotes obsess over sports teams and normie women obsess over taylor swift and other retarded celebrities
NTA but from the way I’ve seen those types act on twitter I seriously think there is something wrong in the head with them

No. 1906091

>>1906083
she clearly didnt say she was final fantasy house schizo tier though

No. 1906092

>>1906086
I genuinely think its human nature to obsess over something. It's why so many fucking religions exist, people need something to latch onto because life fucking sucks.

No. 1906106

>>1906091
I don't know, anon. Maybe she shouldn't have used the word meant to describe psychotic people when she just means passionate kek. I don't mean to split hairs like an autist here but there are fans who make shrines out of earnest. In the west there's people who splurge their income on commissioning art of their characters and bankrupt themselves for it. There's actually psychotic people who get worse by being terminally online. I'm not saying that's what the cosplay book lady is. But there's an unhealthy level of devotion whether it is to 2d or 3d. I can't speak for anon but do touch grass if you think a woman only ever is either a trad thot or a yumefujo sperg (or anything in between those tbh).

No. 1906120

>>1906106
I never implied those things though. I just dont understand what you want her to do, anon said they all touch grass by going to cons and meeting other fans.

No. 1906152

>>1906106
Original ayrt, and
>i don't mean to split hairs like an autist
splitting hairs like an autist is what you are doing. Please chill.
Like other people said, these are women who participate in society and still obsess over their hobbies and interests. Of course I'm not suggesting that these women are literally schizophrenic, or that there is some tradthot-yumejo binary that everyone must fall in. If you're the only one drawing those conclusions when everyone else understood what I meant, next time I will personally tailor the speech in my post to your comprehension level.

Besides that, I didnt specifically mean tradthots, just that here in Japan it is still commonly expected that young women become wives and homemakers (see: Christmas cake) and I personally know way too many scrotes who moved here to win a PR card by saddling some poor early 20's Japanese Google Translate girlfriend with a ton of small children and emotionally neglecting them until the inevitable divorce, so fuck me if I'm happy that women can find ways to enjoy a nerdy youth for a bit without men. Kudos to the moms engaging in nerd hobbies too, like another anon said, it's a good way to relieve stress and maintain some identity.

No. 1906203

>>1904634
>acts as a caretaker figure to the group (light term), especially to Fred since he needs the most emotional support from her.
Every time I see caretaker/caregiver of the group sentence used my eyes twitch, I swear. Most of the time the emotional labor falls on the most feminine female member, of course. What's with babysitting entitlement going on their "progresive" circles?

No. 1906241

>>1906203
I mean, I'm actually a caretaker (I even took a course for it), but I'm taking care of a relative who has serious medical issues. Usually, I wouldn't make a big deal about it, but seeing it used so casually as a character trait does kind of rub me the wrong way.

No. 1906247

>>1906203
Not to mention her having to give the most emotional support to the moid who she isn’t even dating in this au lol (yeah I know, “intersex butch lesbian” kek but I assume it’s all just window dressing and the artist treats him the same as she would any other quirky ‘babygirl’ moid)

No. 1906283

>>1906241
There is difference to taking care of a relative with medical issues and to be a local therapist for healthy male friends.

No. 1906289

>>1906283
Samefag, I forgot about diabetes, don't know much on it, my bad.

No. 1906332

>>1906283
Another big difference is that you can (and in most cases, you have to, with regards to hospital and pharmacy bs) get registered as one.

No. 1906336

File: 1709211485582.jpeg (730.75 KB, 4000x4000, IMG_4085.jpeg)

What’s with the woman-fication (for lack of better word) of male characters these days? At first I thought it was ironic spin off jokes of the moid breed obsession meme with “plap plap get pregnant” but now I dont think its as ironic anymore.

No. 1906337

>>1906336
likely a severe case of what >>1905252 described.

No. 1906342

>>1906336
It's what happens when you grow up in an internet dominated by moid coom, it warps young women into believing that only women can be sexualized

No. 1906348

>>1906336
I know I'll be accused of being 'you know who' over this, but there is absolutely no justification for anyone that isn't terminally brain-rotten, to delude themselves for even a moment that a character can be 'male' if they can be pregnant or bear children.

No. 1906352

>>1906336
when it comes to shit like mpreg with what you're talking about, some women see pregnancy or a baby as the ultimate expression of love/a relationship/sexual success, so they kind of force it on their male fixations (force as in the uh, obvious biological hurdles kek). It reminds me of how some authors (or fans) see their previously independent female main characters becoming barefoot and pregnant as the ultimate culmination of their arc (first example off the top of my head is Feyre from ACOTAR lol). The gendie nonsense in fandom doesn't help either, as that lot are biologically illiterate and view their headcanons on how sex, bodies, and masculinity/femininity works as an avenue for activism and self-reassurance.

There's probably a lot of other/different motivators to arrive at the same mess, such as what >>1906342 said, on top of a growing portion of fandom reading and creating way too much omegaverse content (ignoring everything else about it, omegaverse stuff treats babies in quite possibly one of the weirdest and sometimes outright creepy ways I've seen when the main pairing actually has some instead of just leaving it at all the loopy sex), which some are clearly not able to consume without it affecting them.

No. 1906366

>>1906336
I've never, ever understood this shit. I've only ever wanted my husbando to get me pregnant, not the other way around

No. 1906369

File: 1709213839677.png (923.51 KB, 1100x675, 9FUNIdK.png)

>>1906352
>It reminds me of how some authors (or fans) see their previously independent female main characters becoming barefoot and pregnant as the ultimate culmination of their arc
I sort of have mixed views on this because I have heard this criticism almost exclusively from TIMs, especially regarding an author whose work has been criticized by coomers for over 2 decades now, Christie Golden. She writes mostly about badass female characters whose arcs often end up with them getting married to handsome kind men, having children, and living peaceful lives.(thought this doesn't happen to every female character she's written about) I can understand why certain women wouldn't like being the end goal, but I think if a character has completed their goals, then what more is there to do but have the character 'rest' and finally live their life, other than stretch it out where it devolves into either misery porn or a childish power fantasy.

No. 1906400

>>1906336
I don't get the obsession with pregnancy in general within fandoms, it always sounded creepy to me.

No. 1906424

File: 1709217578117.png (219.61 KB, 624x675, 6p9zfo.png)

>>1906336
phallocentrism.

No. 1906451

>>1906424
It's an imposition of sex-roles essentially, It would be a lot easier and less confusing if they just genderbent honestly.

No. 1906459

>>1906336
Omegaverse has destroyed an entire generation of girls. Also no woman I know who has sex irl actually enjoys pegging moids, this kink is a clear indicator of someone being terminally online and celibate

No. 1906469

>>1906336
Yeah, and I'm so sick with the "he's muhh babygirl/wife!" shit which is so prevalent nowadays. Especially if the fictional male in question is a huge and muscular very masculine fellow. It's just so stupid.

No. 1906471

>>1905252
>Passion is good and all, in life and fiction, but relationships and sex can take time (they are risky and intimate, after all) and somehow these people haven't gotten that message.
This post was really insightful, nonna. I’m in the age-range you describe and it really hit home. Sorry to bring up omegaverse more, but I really think this type of fanfiction serves as a way to bypass the “slowburn” type of romance, that imo, is more realistic for most people. It’s scary to deal with uncertainty, which is how real relationships grow

No. 1906478

>>1906459
pegging is whatever compared to rimming, which seems to be becoming more popular in fic (even untagged, as if it's the same as a cheeky bit of oral and can just be thrown in for a paragraph or two, christ), at least in some of the newer fandoms I've been in. Also, it's mildly fascinating how you can map fetishes across fandoms as people move to and from them.

No. 1906489

>>1906478
we know why rimming is a thing with regards to slash shipping.

No. 1906514

>>1906336
Mental illness.

No. 1906522

>>1906336
You know when I see these stupidest joke posts like this get like 10 anons being outraged like "HOW DARE THEY, DON'T THEY SEE HOW MISOGYNIST THIS IS?!?!?!?!" I can't help but be completely mystified by their lack of self awareness in seeing how they've become what they constantly accuse terminally online "twitterfags" of being - taking fiction and fandom stuff too seriously to the point they completely embarrass themselves by their uncontrollable sperging. It's the same for virtue signaling tranny artwork like that ungodly horrible Scooby Doo image here >>1904634 , any normal person would look at that and laugh their ass off at how ridiculous it is yet some anons can't contain themselves and armchair over how ackshuawwy pwobwematic it is. It makes this thread such a drag to read when I know I'm in the company of a bunch of autistic kids acting in bad faith and looking for things to get angry over. Like I have no idea how people justifiably moralfag about how women are always put under the microscope for whatever they do (absolutely true) yet go to fucking war over the most nonsensical, insignificant things like a female fan calling a male character babygirl or something, thoroughly oblivious to the irony. Truly boggles the mind. We need to bring back the talk about Korean gachacels so they can direct their anger at something worth getting mad about.

No. 1906529

>>1906522
>any normal person would look at that and laugh their ass
no they wouldn't newfag, only irony poisoned retards think the whole "men getting pregnant" shit is funny.

No. 1906530

>>1906522
>10 anons being outraged like "HOW DARE THEY, DON'T THEY SEE HOW MISOGYNIST THIS IS?!?!?!?!"
Yeah but this didn’t happen, strawman-chan

No. 1906535

>>1906529
I swear to god the zoomers on this site are a living proof of reading comprehension and drastically shortened attention span being down the toilet. I'll be sure to make a meme image of 5 words maximum next time.(infighting)

No. 1906538

>>1906400
Same. Making marriage and pregnancy a woman's end goal sounds like the opposite of what a fanfic should be. Sounds super trad tbg

No. 1906539

File: 1709224337202.jpg (96.76 KB, 850x1240, __sinclair_and_yi_sang_project…)

>>1906451
Maybe it's naive, but I want to believe they genuinely want to write gnc women and men. I'm sure it's women and girls posting that "I'll impregnate my husbando" thing. They just don't have the vocab and imagination to think of subverting status quo without feminization of their male object lel.

No. 1906542

>>1906535
You are the one without reading comprehension it’s actually embarrassing

No. 1906543

>>1906469
Gen z keeps calling grown men babygirls, and its disgusting

No. 1906547

>>1906539
I just fear this might actually convince way to young women, with moids who have a higher likelihood of trooning out.

No. 1906548

>>1906522
>nooo dont you dare criticize fandom retardation in the thread to criticize fandom retardation

No. 1906551

>>1906471
A lot of omegaverse/soulbond stuff (especially if it includes smut) is all about falling madly, feverishly in insta-love with someone who is also experiencing the same. If it is a longer story and intended as a slow-burn, smut will often still happen throughout with the slow-burn being the characters finally saying 'I love you' or some shit that gets padded out by melodrama. An interesting thing about omegaverse and the like is that sex is arguably more 'dangerous' than in non-abo, as at least one party is at an extreme risk of pregnancy, is out of their mind and completely pliant, and casual sex has the potential to leave a couple permanently bound to one another or even a near thrall to the alpha/dominant of the pair. The relationship part is often pretty certain/basically fate, with each character having a perfect person out there for them which obviously means a perfect romance (I get the fantasy, I do, I just think it's an interesting contrast in context).

(I find omegaverse interesting to observe because horny-motivated worldbuilding sperging can get wild- have a few personal cows that write screeds about their elaborate alt dynamics and biology that still boils down to the standard a/o or a/b/o- and it's essentially got its own fandom of itself, which I can't really think of any other examples of rn. Sorry for the spergout, watching the whole niche genre develop over the last decade or so has been interesting imo)

'Slow-burn' is also starting to lose it's meaning, as I've seen it more and more used to describe romance books where the main couple doesn't bang until the last quarter of the story, which is… slow, I guess, if you're used to stories where the smut comes in by chapter 5 kek.

No. 1906554

>>1906547
Oh, the men will troon themselves from browsing r/196 or something just fine.

No. 1906559

>>1906548
Do it to your heart's content. Find it cringe and retarded. But the "criticism" becomes cringe and retarded in itself when it crosses over to the "ackshuawwy this is soooo pwobwematic" territory talking about one meme image or one wokefied scooby doo character sheet when it's something you should just scroll past. It's like people are completely incapable of reacting to media without making it a political opinion and concern trolling over how everything is a tranny psyop (like asking for tomboy MCs in otome games or the usage of the mentioned "babygirl" term) when nobody without imageboard brainrot ever perceives it that way.

No. 1906561

>>1906551
I've asked this before (I never got a straight answer), but you have to be aware that pregnancy is so tied to female biology, no matter how much you disguise it, having a pregnant man makes him in female in all aspects.

No. 1906563

>>1906559
you cannot deny the ties between this babygirl/pregnant retardation and troonery. What a coincidence it became popular now in the most coomery and misogynistic era of fandom, but naaah bet it has nothing to do with the current climate

No. 1906565

>>1906561
what about seahorses

No. 1906573

>>1906565
Not a mammal, retard. Do we lay eggs too?

No. 1906575

>>1906561
It's fantasy biology.

No. 1906576

File: 1709225571949.png (464.74 KB, 650x674, Screenshot_375.png)


No. 1906577

>>1906576
i wish we worked like seahorses

No. 1906578

>>1906573
They are mammals.
>>1906565
They just carry the eggs, they don't actually get preggo.

No. 1906582

>>1906561
ayrt and you'd think so, but I think these people are so lost in the fantastical shit they've world-built that they can't see the forest for the trees. Omegaverse might as well be about aliens with human faces, the understanding of biology is so bad. Doesn't help that it's a favourite of gendies, since it's basically both wish fulfilment for them and plays directly into a lot of their issues.

>>1906565
Seahorses are very interesting, but the female does still produce the eggs before depositing them into the male to be fertilised and brooded/gestated, so as ass-backward as their system can seem it's still rooted in the same gamete production 'rules' as other gonochoric organisms.

No. 1906583

>>1906565
what the fuck does have to do anything, one single species of sea life, that technically doesn't even have the male getting pregnant.

No. 1906593

>>1906578
Please take an elementary biology class. Seahorses are not mammals. This level of retardation is alarming

No. 1906596

>>1906573
>>1906593
>>1906583
shit i was just joking because the discussion about omegaverse is so retarded, calm the fuck down

No. 1906597

>>1906577
nta but even in that fantasy, it wouldn't change anything. Let's say we lived in a world where men got pregnant and were on average smaller and physically weaker. Well congratulations, because it's just our world, except you've changed the names. Most real feminists (radical and Marxist ones) are aware of the fact that women face specific issues as a class. Our goal is class revolution. What you're saying is a liberal transhumanist fantasy, which is how we got troonism in the first place.

No. 1906600

>>1906593
obviously they're marsupials, he has a pouch!

No. 1906603

>>1906597
anon its a retarded coom genre for women, it's genuinely not different than other trash like those alien/furry romance novels or 50 shades. It's all extremely retarded wish fullfilment for loser women.

No. 1906605

>>1906559
Self awareness and analysis is a practiced trait. You'll get that nothing exists in a vacuum someday. And then you'll still like the things you like, maybe idk.

No. 1906614

>>1906551
I agree with your analysis. Not particularly into abo myself, but I can see why it’s popular and how this reflects unrealistic media depictions of love and sex. It’s wish fulfillment for women, as >>1906603 said. I think it’s so mainstream now though, it’s hard to argue that it’s some kind of fringe kink only loser women engage with

No. 1906644

>>1906614
>>1906603
It's not fringe anymore because the absurdity of it makes for good memes. Then those get spread and more people find out about it and see that they can get into the idea and that's how you end up with that het romance omegaverse show that even big youtubers like Kurtis Conner and Chad Chad talked about kek. It's almost like a trend, just a new thing to write about in fanfic that's also edgy and shocking because it's so bizarre. It's the same way terms like mogging, looksmaxxing and gooning become mainstream. You can say those on regular social medias now without someone thinking you're a neet loser that only scrolls imageboards

No. 1906657

>>1906644
That's a whole other discussion. Why do terms and memes from 4chan(a site with just a few thousand users) have a disproportionate impact on social media spaces? I mean wojaks have become the standard meme comic format these days. And then you have things like "ChudBob SoyPants" that my 30-year-old normie sister was talking to me about. It doesn't make any sense.

No. 1906659

>>1906657
>4chan
>(a site with just a few thousand users)
…4chan has millions of users anon…with even more millions of lurkers who never post

No. 1906678

>>1906659
>As of 2022, 4chan receives more than 22 million unique monthly visitors, of which approximately half are from the United States.
WTF.

No. 1906683

>>1906678
It hasn't been a niche imageboard in like a decade now. You can't say you use it in public but 4chan, or more specifically the culture from certain boards on 4chan, are mainstream. You think /pol/ rhetoric would have infected the entire internet if it was just a few thousand tards?

No. 1906692

that reminds, I think LC had something like 4000 daily users as well, last times someone posted about some webtraffic poll.

No. 1906694

>>1905368
Bad news: the AI is woke too - what do you think they trained it on? It'll be the same, but with incoherent sentences.

No. 1906695

>>1906692
I wonder how that compares to 2020 stats? I feel like the # of users has been on a steep decline for a while. Compare the current state of lolcow to how busy it was during peak COVID. makes me sad

No. 1906697

>>1906695
I think we've gotten most of our numbers back, but it was barren for a while after the shaymin disaster, still hope we get some more radfem users.

No. 1906705

>>1906010
>Working women and mothers need the escapism the most honestly lol
wasn't the star trek fandom a lot of housewives too?

No. 1906714

File: 1709232991266.png (108.06 KB, 1045x449, tuYhHHE.png)

>>1906705
I don't know about that, but I have occasionally looked into the old star-trek fandom and it's genuinely fascinating to read up about, it was the first true fandom, everything in western fandom can trace it's self back to star trek, from what I understand the appeal of star trek was an entire universe where rationalism, equality, diversity and inclusion won out in the end, it attracted a lot of people with that message, people who believed in those things and wanted a better world.

No. 1906748

File: 1709236355824.jpg (1.14 MB, 1080x2400, 1663342976898.jpg)

Regarding a previous discussion in the previous threat about how can deeply attached to a character from a form of media without actually engaging with the original material (such as not watching the show or reading the books). I think I somewhat understand this phenomenon and where it comes. The less we know about something, the more we can project our own ideals onto it. For example, I sometimes fantasize about a guy I knew in high school who was a friend of a friend. I didn't know much about him, except that he was tall, cute and once saw him smoke a cigarette, which made him seem more mature to me at the time. I would imagine our life together and the experiences he had, even though I have no idea where he is now, how much he's changed physically or if holds batshit political views. but my limited image of him keeps me almost perpetually infatuated with him. I suspect that if I knew more about him, my idealized image would likely crumble and the infatuation would stop and so the same concept applies.

No. 1906767

>>1906657
Imo discord is a large part of the reason why 4chan and its memes/lingo became even more mainstream in the last 5+ years or so. Its so easy to link to a thread in your sekrit discord club so now you have the average redditor and twitterfag on there

No. 1906778

>>1906748
I swear this kind of thing just didn't exist or was an extreme niche 10+ years ago. In 2008 you were basically kicked out if it came to light that you're snooping around the fandom making stupid takes without ever watching or reading the source material, now it's so far normalized that it's you who's considered the creepy nerd for actually being invested in something. I can't help but think that this is another issue derived from online fandom spaces being commodified and gentrified. In your picrel the person even admits in the tags that "this is an oc at this point" which it absolutely is. It's just an OC riding the fame of an established property and exploiting its visibility to farm clout. Media has just been reduced to surface level aesthetics instead of stories and experiences because everything needs to be able to be used as grounds for self-insertation and other egocentric purposes.

No. 1906779

>>1906767
4chan has been a part amd plague of online youth culture since the early 2000s it's never been unknown.

No. 1906783

>>1906767
i thought it was because of the 2016 elections

No. 1906798

>>1906779
But its never really been as severe as it has been in the last decade or so

No. 1906835

File: 1709243485254.jpg (63.76 KB, 600x593, e31888f4-500e-4045-8336-637fb2…)

>>1906748
I was thinking about this today but in the context of ships and satusugo. JJK gives some context about how their friendship broke down and the fandom goes wild and starts filling in the blanks or projecting.
It's really funny seeing people being adamant about how they're romantic when even the mangaka himself doesn't understand where the shipping is coming from.

Anyway you see this whole phenomenon in JJK because admittedly it doesn't have much going for it so you can project your ideas of the characters more easily, the fandom really does make the show worthwhile.

>>1906778
I feel the start of normalising this fan behaviour started with comics first (maybe bands actually) from a good place (you're still a fan even if you didn't read Batman's 80's run during 2010 or something) but people have been pushing the limit for it. Same for for video games on tumblr with respect to playing the game and watching playthroughs, which eventually get stretched into seeing tumblr OOC discussions.

No. 1906837

File: 1709243641945.png (344.59 KB, 527x519, 0cf.png)

>>1906424
Obviously the original is much more wholesome.
There's a similar meme where the original was edited to be like "I want him to suck on my dick" or something and it went viral. I think it was patient 0

No. 1906846

>>1906657
I know for a fact that most of it now comes from tiktok stealing 4chan lingo.
Everything about mewing, mogging, even the gym obsessed culture is from 4chan.
A few months pass and it goes makes rounds on instagram first on edgy accounts then more mainstream normie stuff.

No. 1906899

>>1906846
The cycle is more like: meme originates on 4chan, lurkers repost to Twitter/Reddit, "normie LARPers" who want to come off as channers copy and overuse said memes/terminology to their audience, then they go mainstream.

No. 1906902

>>1906899
I think its insane how those people in-between dont realize they’re the very people 4chan hate, but they think they fit in by regurgitating their lingo and memes kek

No. 1906908

>>1906902
So many of the people who were calling Pepe reaction images racist in 2020 now have "pilled" in their bio and use wojaks. I don't care about being there first or anything but the hypocrisy annoys me and in both scenarios they're just following whatever is popular.

No. 1906934

>>1906908
This might be weird but a part of me likes seeing 4chan scrote memes get run down and ruined by normies

No. 1906938

>>1906778
The industry enabled these retarded takes. How many shitty adaptations did we get the past years? They would change the story, the appearance and the personality of a character, but they were still wearing the same outfit and had the same name, so I guess it's the same character, right?
While most of the fandom was usually very critical to adaptations, people who didn't care for the original enjoyed the adaptations and suddenly joined the fandom. Even if they were completely different. It got progressively worse, because so many pieces of media are written by different people now, so they can change the narrative and personality of the characters any time and that becomes canon. Everything nowadays has a spinoff, a sequel or an adaptation. While I enjoyed exploring the "what ifs" in the fandom, but we knew we were deviating from canon. I feel we lost the limit on how much we can distort and adapt or ignore the original content, to te point the original content became just a faint inspiration. Maybe we dont see as many ocs, because it's just a reflection on the shitty quality of the media we have today.

No. 1906954

>>1906938
> They would change the story, the appearance and the personality of a character, but they were still wearing the same outfit and had the same name, so I guess it's the same character, right?
In all fairness that's only a thing in westoid fandoms and media for a reason. Complaining about changes in adaptations got you mocked. Overtime because studios pushed for diversity that way instead of creating original IPs you also got accused of being racist on top of caring too much.

With respect to comics I can understand deviating a bit because certain characters have had a lot of different writers but some characters have remained pretty consistent over the years or have a specific beloved version, but studios just did their own thing anyway with either great success or resulting in isolating fans.

No. 1907234

File: 1709271388924.png (147.16 KB, 1024x760, 51sTB57.png)

This might sound like a strange question, but why do many wokies seem actually unable to accept the fact that white people can get tans? I've noticed this when people discuss fictional characters who are described as having tanned skin (because they work outdoors), and then assume they are "POC". For example, This has become a trend with Katniss Everdeen recently and I saw this reaction to the girl from the 'distracted boyfriend' meme, who had gotten a tan over the years, and Americans couldn't understand how that happened.

No. 1907245

>>1907234
A majority of these people are American who meaning they have a fundamental inability to comprehend different flavours of European. If you presented a wokie with an actual Romanian from Romania their head would explode trying to figure out how they're not milk white

No. 1907255

>>1907245
"But the authors is American, and she understand the basic fact that depending on the weather and how you live, your skintone can get darker or lighter. My father's work colleague is a Danish man living in our warmer country for a decade now, which has given him a fairly earthy skin tone.

No. 1907272

>>1907234
jennifer lawrence did a good job as katniss but i dont think its controversial to say she doesnt match the physical description of the character in the books. you mention a tan but they dont even bother to give her that shes just white as a sheet the entire way through, not to mention shes pretty much the opposite of scrawny. weirdly the girl they cast in that new movie as snows girlfriend looks way more like what i imagined katniss to look like while reading

No. 1907275

>>1907245
Pretty much all Romanians look white though?

No. 1907283

>>1906835
I just finished JJK and tbh there is fujobait between these two. If the mangaka doesn't get why they're a popular pairing then it must come from the anime director(s) and the guys who wrote the lyrics for the opening and ending songs. Kind of like the Get Backers anime has even more fujobait than the manga, the character designer shipped the main guys together iirc. The third opening is straight up a love song about youth and nostalgia or some shit and I just found out that the writer/singer wrote the lyrics from Gojo's point of view about Geto. The movie has the final scene between these two retards plagiarizing a scene from X1999 between a canon gay pairing. I think MAPPA is still salty that they didn't make that much money from YoI because of some contract fuckery but they know who was spending a shit ton of money on BDs and merchs on that series so they're actively trying to attract the fujo audience again. Me being a fujo aside before watching the anime I thought satosugu was going to be a pairing between two random hot guys who happen to share a backstory so I was surprised there was more than that to them.

No. 1907290

>>1907283
I've been trying to get into JJk, but can't get passed ep 3. I just got bored. The art is nice but I'm burnt out on anime, especially zoomer anime

No. 1907294

>>1907290
I liked the movie and the second season a lot more than the first one so I get you. The first season feels more like a long introduction before crazy shit actually happens, but at the same time there aren't a lot of fun, comfy scenes to compensate for all the action scenes where everyone is beating the shit out of each other to near death.

No. 1907310

>>1907234
I haven’t read the books in ages but Katniss was described as having olive skin. I don’t picture a white person tan when I hear olive, I pictured her having a lighter brown skin personally. This isn’t a recent thing, your picture is probably over 10 years old, the look of Katniss in the movies was a bit of an issue with some fans because she’s described pretty racially ambiguous in the books from what I remember.

>gotten a tan over the years, and Americans couldn't understand how that happened

Weird kek where I’m from tanning has always been a beauty trend and some people can naturally get pretty dark so that’s not all Americans. Just very loud, probably young ones who would have a stroke if they went to different parts of the country.

No. 1907314

File: 1709278864407.png (48.6 KB, 634x328, bN8ogGC.png)

>>1907310
I wanted to post another recent image that had gotten really popular(couldn't find it), obviously referencing Hunger Games, It was basically a re-draw of picrel featuring Katniss.

No. 1907321

>>1907275
plenty of americans think italians aren't white nona, the bar is low

No. 1907328

>>1907321
Get off 4chan

No. 1907338

>>1907321
That is not fucking true KEK

No. 1907342

>>1907321
Everybody knows Italians are white gootbye

No. 1907356

>>1907321
only terminally online white supremacists do

No. 1907372

>>1907234
>This has become a trend with Katniss Everdeen recently
This has been a thing for at least a decade, I remember people complaining about Katniss’s skintone back when the movie came out lol

No. 1907385

>>1907372
Tbf, that criticism was among others. She (and many of the characters) didn't look like they were ever in dire straits. I always pictured Katniss as looking more 'wiry' and gaunt.

No. 1907392

>>1907385
They didn’t have JLaw lose lots of weight so she didn’t influence teens to become bone rattling ana-chans

No. 1907394

>>1907234
Easy, terminally online zoomies never go outside so something like being in the sun changing the color of your skin is unfathomable to them.

No. 1907396

>>1907392
there's a way to character be thin without being an anachan.

No. 1907399

It's so exhausting trying to make friends with other women in fandom and once you think you're hitting it off they pull out some terminal gendie shit. I already have a lot of people who are annoying about gendie headcanons on mute, so it's dissappointing to find out someone I thought was chill was going to be annoying about them too, especially when I'm in a tiny fandom

No. 1907405

>>1907399
I just started larping as a man to avoid gendies. It sucks but men dont care about that shit.

No. 1907419

>>1907399
Honest question, are most anons posting here really young or hanging around young people? Like teenagers and early 20's? I'm in my 30's and I barely see any psychotic gendershit despite being chronically online and involved in many popular fandoms, at most I come across a relatively mature tranny my age once in a while but immediately when I step out of my age group to around 16-year olds they're everywhere. I never see people over 25 be as ridiculously obnoxious about it. And that's par for the course for teenagers to be honest, being obnoxious is kind of their modus operandi and they will grow out of it eventually.

No. 1907420

>>1907419
anon said shes into a small fandom though

No. 1907422

>>1907419
I’m in my mid 20s but most of the people in the fandom Im in are relatively young, with maybe ~18 as the average. Though even people my age tend to throw gendieshit at you in my experience, I was bemoaning an experience I just had with another mid 20s woman.

No. 1907455

>>1907342
Nta but I remember back in the 2010s there were posts shitting themselves over drawing spaniard characters blonde or "white washing" them (I remember this with some Tulio and Miguel fanart specifically), things have definitely changed since then though, I think part of it is a bigger presence of black users active in social media. Those retard takes came from sheltered white Tumblr milennials.

>>1907419
Almost every fandom I've had interest in has been infested with under 25 zoomers, they're hard to avoid. Even the ones hitting that age have the terminally online mentality of that generation, look at people like Pixielocks for example who aren't that young anymore and yet still roleplaying autism and being ~qweer~

Sure, the the more obnoxious but I also believe it's a generational thing for Gen Z to obsess over identity politics, and Gen Z is starting to age into their 30s at this point. It makes sense that the internet will be filled with these kinds of people as Milennials age out of fandoms.

No. 1907467

>>1907234
>why do many wokies seem actually unable to accept the fact that white people can get tans?
why do many white racists seem unable to accept that a character they like can be brown? no but seriously, this all boils down to movie portrayal vs book description, and book descriptions can be very ambiguous and are open to interpretation. no one can be right or wrong in this because the book doesn't mention race at all, but insisting a character is white and that every other interpretation is "woke" and wrong is just retarded and does actually come off as racist and a little crazy.

No. 1907541

>>1907275
Ayrt, there a huge visual difference between a Northern European and a Southern European that Americans mentally can not grasp. Romanians are certainly white, yes, but the aesthetic differences between a Southern European (olive/dark/tan skin, brown eyes, dark hair) and the American concept of a white character (aryan blonde milky white with blue or green eyes and 0 cultural background) is a world apart from Eachother. Having a white character with tan skin doesn't even compute to these people because tan immediately signifies POC to them

No. 1907553

>>1907467
>insisting a character is white and that every other interpretation is "woke" and wrong is just retarded and does actually come off as racist and a little crazy.
Have you ever considered maybe, just maybe, not everyone who feels weird about this isn't a seething racist? Harry Potter was a white bitch they can't just roll out a Japanese guy for the movies and say "actually the book just said he was pale with black hair they never said he was white". It's less about people chimping because of brown people being present It's about people just being so fatigued by this weirs insistence that every protagonist has to be a Liza Koshy quirky brown woman to deliver commentary

No. 1907590

>>1907553
Does it really matter that much? Anons always say they don't care about representation and that they can empathize with anyone based on personality and story alone, so it shouldn't be that big of a deal if nothing else changes. Of course it would be better if there was new media made with characters that aren't white from the get-go but we don't live in a world where new things get made kek it's all sequels and retellings

No. 1907662

>>1907234
Everyone is aware that white people can tan. Yet Katniss wasn't described with having a tan, she was described as having olive skin, which is very specific. Besides, the Hunger Games fandom are the same people who threw a fit over Rue being Black despite it being written in the book. I don't expect you all to have arguments in good faith concerning skin color or even race.

No. 1907665

>>1907553
in the case that was discussed, which is the hunger games, the character isn't "clearly white" at all, so your example doesn't even make sense. i don't think everyone who headcanons a character as white is racist, but a lot of the vocal protests against characters being portrayed as brown, when there is literally nothing in the original work that would contradict this (as in the hunger games for example) are indeed coming from seething racists. and feeling "fatigued" with ethnicities other than white in media is silly and childish, but that's my opinion.

No. 1907860

>>1907665
>and feeling "fatigued" with ethnicities other than white in media is silly and childish
Thoroughly examine the non-white characters being peddled at people right now and actually think about what you're saying. Most mainstream POC characters are the same flavour of annoying sarcastic nlog shoehorned into things, they're not well written and they have no depth. You're calling people childish for being vocally bored of the same copy and paste character being shat at them over and over again kek

No. 1907947

>>1906778
>In 2008 you were basically kicked out if it came to light that you're snooping around the fandom making stupid takes without ever watching or reading the source material
The lowest bar for "joining" a fandom back then was just playing the game or watching the show (or reading if it was a comic/book). Which is actually a low bar now, but it feels like everyone's attention spans are fried now and the new hip fandom changes every month. Who has time to play a 50+ hour game that might be uncool by the time you finish it, might as well just watch a streamer play it and read wiki. Or if it's a show you can binge watch it in a day and forget all the important parts.

No. 1907963

>>1907860
>annoying sarcastic nlog shoehorned into things, they're not well written and they have no depth
that's all female characters, all the time. you're just reaching hard for criticisms that could be applied to any female character regardless of ethnicity, because you have no argument against non-white characters in media other than "but mommy i don't want to see the brown people anymore!"

No. 1908051

>>1907321
maybe this anon meant hundreds of years ago kek
>>1907419
some of the most annoying gendies i encountered were 25-30 year olds, i don't hang out in fandoms popular with teens.

No. 1908054

>>1906522
>"waaaahhh it's the rules of feminism to make fun of mpreg weirdos!"

No. 1908070

>>1907590
and i think that's the problem. No one wants to create anything new anymore.

No. 1908127

>>1907963
Literally not once did I say I was completely averse to brown or POC characters, the problem is that the POC and brown characters that are being provided are complete ass. I can pick out multiple examples on non nlog sarcastic shallow characters in modern media but once they're POC or brown they are purposefully written as a vessel for the author to preach through. I'm sorry that nobody wants to sit through another movie/book/TV show where they get preached at by a badly written boring character, but go off I guess

No. 1908140

>>1907314
I don't understand how this isn't seen as racist, especially considering the circles that this sperging always comes out of. Like why single out East Asian artists kek? I usually hate the weeby idol worship that some nonnies in this thread direct toward them but it really does seem like they're just mad that popular East Asian artists draw better than they ever could.

No. 1908142

>>1908070
Not true, tons of pitches are made only to be immediately rejected because no company wants to produce something that isn't guaranteed to make a profit.

No. 1908149

>>1907422
It really feels like a lot of older people in fandom have either retreated to smaller private spaces or have gone to the opposite extreme of gendie anti shippers and spend all their free time talking about how shipping incest is kweer activism or whatever. It sucks, I miss when fandom was about the art only, writing fic or drawing just for the fun of it. Nowadays it feels like everyone's competing and everyone who isn't already has their own impossible to breach circle of friends.

No. 1908166

>>1908127
And plenty of white characters suffer through this, too. Let's be honest, we've seen how fandom will take the most bland, stale bread white boy and give him an entire backstory and personality unrelated to canon. Fandom has plenty of imagination and empathy when it comes to their white faves, yet it's the POC characters that have to be "good and have depth" for you to give a shit about them or be valuable to the story.

No. 1908172

>>1908149
>or have gone to the opposite extreme of gendie anti shippers and spend all their free time talking about how shipping incest is kweer activism or whatever.
God I fucking hate that shit. I honestly don’t give a fuck if people like “problematic” content most of the time, women aren’t the ones out there committing sex crimes so I really couldn’t care less if they like an age gap or incest ship here and there. But they will never fucking shut up about it, they have to make their whole personality revolve around how edgy they are for wanting to see two brothers buttfuck each other and how totes oppressed they are for writing porno fanfics. Part of me thinks people shouldn’t be harassed over fiction when fandoms overreact to any minor aggression, but when people show their whole ass drawing shit like that one TiF drawing shota torture amputee porn I can’t help but think they have the zoomer hatemob coming.

No. 1908177

>>1908149
>or have gone to the opposite extreme of gendie anti shippers and spend all their free time talking about how shipping incest is kweer activism or whatever.
I hate this shit too. I thought 30+ fandom people would be more sane since we grew up dealing with shipwars and how stupid they are, but I guess not. I technically agree with "proshippers" on paper but I don't trust anyone who identifies that way because they're equally obsessed with internet activism.

No. 1908191

>>1908149
>or have gone to the opposite extreme of gendie anti shippers and spend all their free time talking about how shipping incest is kweer activism
I can do you one worse. I've seen and had the misfortune of talking to people who think people being disgusted at their vomit and diaper fetishes makes them oppressed (I fucking wish) so It's always disappointing to meet someone who's pendulum swinged so hard from cringe that it landed in edgy cringe. Women aren't the ones committing sex crimes like that other anon said, so have a little bit of self awareness to realize you just want to see siblings fuck and it's not activism or a personality trait or something, even if I agree with you. Fuck.

No. 1908210

>>1907283
Nta but
>mappa
They do have tons of fujobait in their works it's crazy. They did it with AOT the final season with the infamous table scene and Armin, and they made Floch extra hot for the shipping with either Jean or Eren and for fangirls in general, and they released merch where Floch is holding Eren's jacket as his most important possession.

No. 1908222

>>1908172
tbh I think the whole pro/anti thing being so black and white is why the fans of proship stuff are like that. Almost every fandom has that one ~problematic~ ship where if you like it, you're blacklisted by the rest of the fandom and forced to hang out with the kink freaks. I don't like shota torture amputee shit but that person would be more likely to talk to me than anyone else in the fandom because I ship a character that's 16 or like an incest ship. I'm not oppressed for my taste or anything, don't think there's anything wrong with not liking it, but I wish people could just be more normal on both ends of the pro/anti shit kek. I really hate how "proship" encompasses everything from edgy fanfic TiFs to actual pedo moids making photorealistic 3d loli porn

No. 1908266

>>1908172
I think part of it is the more hate you get for something, the more you counterreact. It's why so many of the people who like problematic ships and kinks are the most edgy try hards in the fandom. They think they're being oppressed, so they become louder and more obnoxious, even encouraging the hatred while simultaneously trying to censor it.

No. 1908267

>>1908142
that's even worse

No. 1908311

>>1908222
"Problematic ship" is too wide of an umbrella in general. There's content that's technically unethical in real life but still in mainstream media, like teacher/student or younger woman/older man. Things like Twilight or Game of Thrones would technically be "problematic content" even if most normies don't blink an eye at it. When I was in fandom during the 2000s things like shipping teenagers or incest wasn't callout-worthy and a matter of "don't like, don't read". I always thought "problematic ship" was for noncon or characters under 16 until I saw things like Sheith or Kaeluc labeled that.

No. 1908312

>>1908172
The world was a better place when being a kinky sex pest was universally frowned upon and if you openly admitted to being a deviant you were shunned by everyone. The man who came up with masochism in the 18th century was put in jail for his pedo masochistic fanfics, bring that back.

No. 1908452

>>1908172
'proshipper' is just a way for tiffies to moralfag about women who arent into their crypto ddlg and old man propaganda garbage. They never harass moids who draw semi realistic lolis or women getting mutilated, they always join forces to go send death treaths to the women drawing 16yo husbandos.

No. 1908454

>>1908312
The world was definetly sooo much better when women were stoned for falling in love with other women or showing a cm of ankle

No. 1908474

>>1906522
You’re correct and you’re only getting unfunny passive aggressive replies because the autistic zoomers are ashamed to see how similar they are to what they supposedly “hate”. It’s like the twitter “radfems” who are literally just woke but with a couple ideological parameters adjusted.

No. 1908475

>>1908474
imagine getting this offended because anons laughed at you for calling an anime scrote cringy terms like baby girl kek

No. 1908482

>>1908454
You joke but the tradthots will think you're being unironic and agree with you.

No. 1908485

>>1908454
It's almost as if extremism is bad!

No. 1908486

>>1908485
>says the person that has been baiting for months

No. 1908499

File: 1709358306916.png (135.31 KB, 523x797, 6N9G1EU.png)

>>1906522
>>1906559
>>1908474
Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe there is something to be said about how a popular way to allegedly sexualize men is to use terms that are usually used for women, like the whole "get pregnant" thing and of course the "big bara tiddies"? We all know that men's chests don't work that way. I would assume that most people who make these memes are likely virgins or have only been with overweight men and TIFs. In my opinion, it doesn't sexualize men because none of these physical traits are found in most men. Regardless of her many issues and beliefs, someone like Ayn Rand could sexualize men better without any issues

No. 1908502

>>1908454
NTA But I hope you're not conflating female liberation and males psyoping sex liberation to women performing kinks for them as a progressive thing to do.

No. 1908503

>>1908499
the obsession with fat moids is so annoying i miss my skinny fit twinks

No. 1908506

>>1908502
the anon i was responding to is a known baiter who only seems to have a problem with ''degeneracy'' when its women enjoying yaoi. Connect the dots and you can tell who's the baiter.

No. 1908507

>>1908499
>maybe, just maybe
I didn't read the rest of your post but anon please try not to sound so fresh off of twitter

No. 1908509

File: 1709358851039.png (245.18 KB, 800x450, TBHWKNP.png)

>>1908499
In her most famous work(The Fountainhead) Ayn Rand literally wrote her self insert character having steamy sex with with her idealized husbando i.e a hot capitalist dude.
the actual lines
>"I pay you big money for one hour of fixing my chimney. Yes, it has only a little scratch and I did it on purpose
>Also I am alone and defenseless, I wonder what would happen"
>"Yes, mister Roark, I am glad we understood each other, now if you want to keep your job come to my place once a week to fix my chimney again and I would pay you a lot"

Ayn Rand wrote a book about genius architect who has a perfect body, Then self-inserts as a strong woman who harasses him and uses him like a whore, IRL she did have an affair with a young psychology student 25 years her junior(While she was married to another man)

No. 1908511

File: 1709358878783.gif (Spoiler Image,2.42 MB, 640x640, 1694183862240937.gif)


No. 1908513

>>1908511
he looks like a downie

No. 1908516

>>1908513
I've noticed some of you try to use down syndrome where it doesn't apply and it begins to seem like a Freudian slip.

No. 1908519

>>1908516
but he does though, he has the small beady eyes fat round face and is definetly low iq considering he's wearing a cap inside. He also looks like dropped his chicken nuggie in the floor and is looking for it to stick it in his fat fuck face

No. 1908520

>>1908499
I'm sorry but pecs just sounds awkward to me. Chest too, it's too short. Boob-bies tid-dies Pecs-. It just doesn't roll of the tongue and as such cannot fill the enotion i am trying to convey. I am sorry.

No. 1908525

>>1908520
i am glad i am a thighs and tummy stacy and i dont have to deal with this level of retardation

No. 1908526

>>1908511
disgusting

No. 1908530

>>1908525
I wouldn't be surprised if some nonna had a problem with the word "tummy" either.

No. 1908531

>>1908530
why would they? its an unisex term

No. 1908534

>>1908531
Childish term, infantilizes people, men say it to be weird, take your pick or wait until someone explains why it's bad.

No. 1908537

>>1908534
>childish term infantilizes people
i dont care if men get infantilized
>men say it to be weird
i dont care what men think
it will never be as retarded as calling male pecs boobies because you are uncomfortable sexualizing men

No. 1908544

>>1908537
I meant that it can be seen as a childish term that infantilizes women, but good for you.

No. 1908549

>>1908530
I’ve no involvement in this argument but the word tummy is gross if someone who isn’t a child says it. Idgaf about what fujos and yumejos call themselves though keep drawing horny art and scaring moids

No. 1908555

Honestly if the first thing that comes to your mind when you think of male pecs is ''boobs'' you might be bit homosexual. Reminds me of moids calling male assholes 'boypussy' to seem less gay. You fags are just homosexuals in denial.

No. 1908566

>>1908555
I see, a man attracted to a man is gay and woman attracted to a man is also gay

No. 1908578

>>1908555
Titties is OUR objectifying term. Only women should be pointed out as big bouncing boobies.
Objectifying a man like that? Sounds a bit gay ngl. They should be nonexistent, like flat boards.

No. 1908579

>>1908566
if the first thought when you see a man is ''boobs'' then yeah, you are a bit gay

No. 1908582

>>1908578
just call them pecs its genuinely not that hard i dont understand why the modern woman is so afraid of sexualizing men

No. 1908583

Fwiw I have never seen a man not become severely uncomfortable at being told he has boobs/tits.
They get very, very insecure about gyno and they do not like being sexualized (even if it's from a homoman woman).

No. 1908584

>>1908583
So you're saying I should keep doing it?

No. 1908585

>>1908583
>misogynistic men get uncomfortable when compared to women
>tehehe i am going to keep doing it i am such a feminist!
reminds of those 'dominatrixs' that think they are so cool and girlboss for force feminizing scrotes and indulging into their sissy fetishes.

No. 1908586

File: 1709362889028.jpg (138.15 KB, 1080x507, 88652279953.jpg)

i keep seeing posts like this but never any actual examples of it happening. one or two people having ocs where the butch has darker skin and the white one is very feminine is not enough to call something a racist trend, not to mention black and brown butches exist irl

No. 1908589

>>1908585
>when compared to women
When described with sexual terms that are usually used to onjectify a woman's breasts.
Who calls breasts "titties" in a nonsexual way?

No. 1908590

>>1904787
>>1904743
>>1904804
There is problems with their weird concept of 'identity', but primarily it's because it makes you a victim and proudly displaying that secures your place in the hierarchy, so it's often a requirement.

No. 1908591

>>1908589
it's still retarded though, you cannot deny that using those terms on men only indulges into their degenerate sissy fantasies and in the further objectification of women. I genuinely dont understand whats the problem with pecs.

No. 1908595

>>1908578
You sound misogynistic. These are words that describe the female body. Disassociating them from that and treating them as a purely degrading thing and trying to apply them to men, who literally do not have them, is weird as fuck.

No. 1908596

>>1908591
Connecting sexualizing terms as only to do with women sexualizes women more than having it describe both.
Anything can set men off, pecs, thighs, tummies just as much. So personally, I don't care what men think.

No. 1908601

>>1908596
then why dont you sexualize pecs instead?

No. 1908605

>>1908586
Where is OP seeing this wealth of butch/femme art that's "done wrong"?

No. 1908606

>>1908591
Girl shut the hell up(infighting)

No. 1908611

>>1908585
Depends on who anon is doing it to. There are different types of guys. Guys who are into working out and being macho (not terminally online ones), will likely get insecure if you call them "boobs" specifically — not titties. Hentai brained imageboard dwelling dorks are a very different story and you should never relate their bodies to ours, particularly in sexualized slang

No. 1908614

>>1908601
I use pecs too but now it's very annoying to see the absolute autism over it.
Maybe it's because I refused to ever call my breasts titties to begin with, that I don't immediately think "woman are the ones with titties".

No. 1908615

>>1908611
I think calling pecs boobs is a terminally online tif thing. No matter how much anons cope about how its ackshually super feminist tehehe it's still something mostly self hating tifs do, which is self explanatory. I still dont understand whats wrong with pecs though.

No. 1908619

>>1908614
I refuse to call pecs ''tits/boobs'' because it's TIF speech.

No. 1908622

>>1908619
Is it girl power to call your breasts bouncing boobies

No. 1908627

>>1908622
i know you are trying really hard to be funny but you just come off as an irony poisoned twitter teen

No. 1908628

>>1908627
Do you call your chest titties though?

No. 1908629

>>1908628
No because i am ESL in my country they are called tetas

No. 1908630

>>1908622
Nayrt but god you people always have to make things weird and hypersexed. "Calling men's pecs tits is stupid" does not equate to "unnnf womens breasts are bouncing oiled mommy milkerssss" like shut up this whole argument is pointless and pathetic. All of you should close tab and worry about your own lives, including tayrt.

No. 1908634

>>1908630
I genuinely dont understand the anons that come to tell anons to touch grass in the thread to discuss fandom retardation. You arent some super mature adult you are still a loser nerd and if you are ITT then you also care about other forms of fandom retardation, which indicates a severe lack of grass contact.

No. 1908644

>>1908634
This thread regularly contains Tumblr-tier shitflinging, nothing you guys argue about is relevant to anyone except those of you entrenched in said fandom spaces. You've reduced yourselves to crying and bitching about pecs and tits. Yeah, I don't care if you go outside or sit in your parked car in the garage and turn the key in the ignition. Just move on.

No. 1908647

>>1908634
You are aware other people can see what you say in the thread preview, right? Like we aren't required to be in your shitty space to see this, it's unfortunately right there.

No. 1908650

>>1908630
The "it's misogyny/gay moid brained(?)/ tranny coded to take titties away from being a woman word" needs to touch grass as much, tbf.
Just say the word sounds gross or its shit or pecs are gross and be done with it instead of both sides dragging "I'm right because I'm the feminist way". It's pathetic.

No. 1908651

>>1908647
this whole thread is about discussing thing that dont matter, it's cringe you come here thinking you are above nerds discussing nerd shit

No. 1908652

>>1908650
you arent taking titties away from its original meaning you, its you pretending you are being feminist while using self hating tif language that's trying really hard to ''reclaim'' a word that has always been used for women and it wont change just because a few tiffies only use it for their inflated fat scrotes

No. 1908655

>>1908651
Nothing will be more cringe than you fags arguing over whether or not it's kosher to call pecs boobies.

No. 1908656

>>1908655
its more cringe to get this offended over anons criticizing retarded twitter tif speech

No. 1908657

>>1908652
Calling men's gyno tits has been done since the dawn of time, how chronically online are you that you associate it with a small subset of people on Twitter

No. 1908658

>>1908656
>offended
I think you are mentally challenged actually

No. 1908660

>>1908657
is your only example of 'based moid sexualization!11!'' moids bullying fat moids and degrading them by comparing them to women? you must be really dumb kek

No. 1908661

>>1908652
Google "night sky", stare at it for a minute, really digesting it, and then look back at what you wrote and realize nobody gives a fuck about some "tif speech" that'll be dead within the decade.

No. 1908664

>>1908661
they definetly care considering they have been defending it for hours instead of accepting its self hating tif speech and not some uber feminist way to take titties away from its original meaning

No. 1908666

>>1908664
They care about your crippling autism. They want you to get help.

No. 1908669

>>1908666
>ur the autist ackshually gotcha
>proceeds to get super offended when she gets compared to self hating tifs
lol ok

No. 1908670

>>1908664
No I just saw all of this, I haven't viewed this for "hours" but im telling you that you are a triggered psychotic bitch because men's chests have been referred to casually as titties for longer than I can remember.

No. 1908671

>>1908669
You do realize multiple anons are replying to you, right?

No. 1908672

>>1908660
You are mentally ill.

No. 1908673

>>1908669
Flabbergasted is more accurate.

No. 1908674

>>1908670
I have never heard mens pecs get refereed as titties except for moids degrading fat moids, which just proves my point that you arent le based feminist who offends moids by calling their pecs titties instead of pecs like a normal person

No. 1908677

Please exit your homes and just take in the fresh air at least once a week nonnies.

No. 1908678

>>1908671
yeah and they are all retarded and offended over me stating the obvious for some reason. They have been doing mental gymnastics trying to justify how calling men pecs boobs/tits is actually super feminist ecksdee when its just something extremely mentally ill tifs do

No. 1908685

>>1908674
>I have never heard mens pecs get refereed as titties except for moids degrading fat moids
We can read back the thread so why lie?
You have nonstopped blabbered on about seething how its being used by "tifs" which at this point, I wouldn't be surprised would count literally any women.

No. 1908689

>>1908678
It isnt feminist you miserable bitch, it doesn't mean much of anything. You're about to have a stroke over it tho, maybe you should sit this out. Can't be good for your blood pressure.

No. 1908694

>>1908685
literally who but tifs calls men pecs boobs its extremely mentally ill modern twitter slang this didnt happen in the pre 2014 internet when women existed in fandom separated from moids and their degeneracy
>>1908689
i mean all of you have been trying to justify how calling men pecs boobs is not misogynistic at all!1! and then all you examples are other men using ''titties'' to degrade fat moids. Still none of you can justify why using 'boobs/tits' is better than just calling them pecs, which proves my point kek

No. 1908698

>>1908694
Theyre on your mind a lot, arent they? Are you an angry lesbian? Are you mad? What is causing you to mald so hard(infighting)

No. 1908702

>>1908698
i am just pointing out the obvious but you keep going ''huh why you malding touch grass ur a miserable bitch'' instead of answering me why not just use pecs instead of boobs/tits? some of you have never done and ounce of introspection and it shows

No. 1908706

>>1908702
I think you're just angry that young people have begun using tits in a gender neutral way. I don't see them using it to refer to fat men, I see it used for built attractive men as well. I also see a variety of people do that, not muh ebil tiffanies. Aren't you tired yet?

No. 1908709

>>1908706
keep lying to yourself. Those ''zoomers'' using tits instead of pecs are coincidentally the generation thats the most obssesed with gender norms and the most self hating pickme women. You clearly dont like to think or are too dumb to put two and two together.

No. 1908710

>>1908709
No you're like a dog with rabies biting at anyone who comes near you. Your level of delusion is impossible to reason with. You will remain a whingy victim all of your life. Please go find joy in something lol you're going to get Parkinsons disease and dementia simultaneously by age 45.

No. 1908711

I'm calling them peccies from now on.

No. 1908716

>>1908710
all this coping just for pointing out the obvious. Insecure women who have been socialized to feel shame for feeling any kind of lustful thought towards men unless it benefits men calling pecs boobs are no different from self hating insecure faggots desperately trying to not appear gay by calling moids assholes boypussy.

No. 1908717

>>1908709
>All those zoomer pickme tifs.
Can you speak without zoomer tif word salads?
>>1908711
Was on team pecs but I kneel. Peccies it is. Guess we can compromise.

No. 1908718

>>1908694
>literally who but tifs calls men pecs boobs
Tbh I'm a straight woman with no desire to transition who started calling men's pecs titties because of the bara meme on this website. It does happen.

No. 1908719

>>1908711
what about pecties

No. 1908721

>>1908711
I find it very interesting that at the exact same time as this is happening, an anon is calling all women (including lesbians) threatened pickmes in the news thread, and calling women retarded whores in the vent thread. Like just die if harassing women on an anonymous imageboard is the only thing that brings you joy in life.

No. 1908722

>>1908716
We are all laughing at you btw

No. 1908724

>>1908716
Calling pecs boobs gives men a victory somehow?
Have you done this before and fell on top of a tranny or sonething?

No. 1908725

>>1908718
>bara
kek ofcourse
>>1908717
my bad, all those women born between 1997 and 2009 transexual men who are too afraid of their own sexuality and call male pecs boobies are retarded. Is that better for you?(infighting)

No. 1908726

All this whining about tif-speak when you can go into any of the hornyposting threads on this site and see nonnas calling pecs titties…

No. 1908727

>>1908726
most anons are twitterfags, surprise

No. 1908730

it's funny how none of you can give me a reason as to why you prefeer to use boobs/tits instead of pecs, because if you think about it for more than a few seconds you end up proving me right

No. 1908731

>>1908724
I think you are genuinely retarded

No. 1908732

>>1908725
>all those women born between 1997 and 2009
I can see who you have a real problem with, yeah.

No. 1908735

>>1908730
Nonna being a brick wall isn't something to be proud of.

No. 1908737

>>1908732
yes zoomer women ruined fandom did you arrive to this thread today?

No. 1908738

>>1908735
so… no answer?

No. 1908739

>>1908730
You tell me what's wrong with people neutralizing a word commonly used to sexualize women? Also, men do have breast tissue so there's nothing even anatomically incorrect about using the word on them

No. 1908740

File: 1709368708482.gif (4.02 MB, 220x140, 1000003090.gif)

>>1908738
>SO NO ANSWER?

No. 1908741

>>1908739
then are men also super based for calling male ass boypussy instead of ass?

No. 1908743

>>1908740
still no answer

No. 1908744

>>1908694
It's more of a pornsick thing than a tif thing.

No. 1908745

>>1908741
We don't care.

No. 1908746

>>1908745
kek you are just as insecure and retarded as gross coomer moids, couldnt be me

No. 1908747

>>1908741
That's a completely different body part that isn't analogous to a vagina so no. Male breasts are very much analogous to female ones though

No. 1908748

>>1908746
Projection

No. 1908749

File: 1709369000387.gif (42.13 KB, 161x90, sensible-chuckle.gif)

>>1908735
>>1908738
>so… no answer?

No. 1908750

>>1908747
>Male breasts are very much analogous to female ones though
please open an anatomy book, some fat roid injected moid's pecs arent the same as female breasts. You know the bast majority of those moids with ''boobs ecksdee'' literally inject themselves with oil to look that way because its not natural?

No. 1908751

>>1908750
It's funny how all the losers come out of their lonely caves like roaches to make fun of us roided muscle-crackhead enjoyers.
I'm feeding my pig carcinogenic protein dust by the spoonful and he let's me punch him in the jaw because he's too poor to buy his own MEGA BIG-BOY PROTEIN EXTRAVAGANZA CHUM BUCKET from Decathlon. I don't have to worry about when to dump him because his heart will give up on him before I do.
You will be buying diapers for skinnyfat faggot with your own retirement money in a couple decades but MUSCLEPIG will already be six foot under & STILL mogging your faggot even as a skeleton.
Imagine being too scared to drop kick your Nigel becuase he might fucking die. Couldn't be me! Mine is already dying. A heart attack wouldn't be out of the ordinary in an autopsy situation.
Bucktooth Becky's stay seething over the PIG-PUNCHING Stacy. #mindset

No. 1908752

>>1908748
idk anon i am not the one defending a coomer meme for hours on end

No. 1908753

>>1908752
Actually you're just crying and bitching and whining and making false equivalences for hours on end.

No. 1908754

>>1908741
I think titties should exist as a word, just not only as a way to sexualize only female breasts.
I think pussy should never be used for anything.

No. 1908755

>>1908750
I said analogous, not same. Learn to read.

No. 1908756

I'm either dumb as a box of hair or just genuinely unaware of some grammatical issues but I dont care about the term titties

No. 1908757

>>1908751
you got nothing original to say? only an old copypasta and reaping the same thing i say like a child throwing a temper tantrum?
>>1908753
how is that a false equivalent? calling moids pecs boobs and moids asshole boypussy are literally the same. But i guess when moids do it instead of tifs its ''not based'' and ''bad, actually''

No. 1908759

File: 1709369216125.jpg (44.21 KB, 827x576, 20240124_223746.jpg)

>>1908755
She cant read. She is typing from the dim light inside of her hole and she doesn't have much time left

No. 1908760

>>1908754
the point its that it doesnt, no matter how much you sperg about it ''tits'' will always be a synonym for women's breasts. A bunch of terminally online coomer twitterfags arent going to change that, just accept it.

No. 1908761

>>1908755
they still arent though, they are called pecs for a fucking reason

No. 1908762

>>1908760
Looks like you're the one having a hard time accepting reality. How much outside stimulaton do you get btw? Do you have a job? Friends? Any loved ones?

No. 1908763

>>1908760
You know words can change meaning right? And no one is saying the word doesn't apply to female breasts, they've just expanded it to apply to males as well.

No. 1908764

>>1908761
Ooo you're mad as hell

No. 1908765

>>1908762
yes and all of them would laugh at you for trying to imply calling mens pecs boobies is based instead of cringy and terminally online

No. 1908766

>>1908761
Wait until you find out women have pecs too.

No. 1908767

>>1908763
i still dont get it, why not use pecs, why boobs? funny how literally none of you can answer that.

No. 1908768

>>1908765
Not a single person has called it based. You are projecting. The only one being laughed at is you but I have a feeling you are used to that

No. 1908769

>>1908760
>just accept having your breasts called titties
No. I will not.

No. 1908770

>>1908767
God you're like a broken record, shut your ugly ass up

No. 1908771

>>1908769
Nice tits buttercup(infighting)

No. 1908772

>>1908766
they are hiden behind the fat tissues though, that's why they are not the same kek its only something that shows up for super roided women

No. 1908773

>>1908769
men will call them tits anyways regardless of if you like it or not and using for men only normalizes it further

No. 1908774

File: 1709369672493.jpg (81.99 KB, 432x596, 20220927_081158.jpg)


No. 1908776

>>1908771
>>1908773
I'm starting to wonder if this is a moid trying to stop women from using the word.
>i-itll just normalize the word!! And that's bad, f-for women, obviously! Men love being told they have tits! Honest!(scrotefoiling/infighting)

No. 1908778

it's annoying how we can never discuss anything without the resident twitterspergs getting super pissed to the point they start infighting and spamming their shitty unfunny reaction images.

No. 1908779

>>1908776
>scrotefoiling
this is how you show you are truly angry, trying to discredit me not by using arguments but by accusing me of being a moid because i disagree with you.

No. 1908780

>>1908776
Nope you're just really annoying

No. 1908781

>>1908779
>nice tits, buttercup

No. 1908783

File: 1709369883919.jpeg (240.18 KB, 997x2048, GDeQVbTWIAAkoSV.jpeg)

The most entertaining shit I've seen recently was fujoshi and male shonentards arguing over whether Gojo/Geto are an actual thing or not. I thought it would be the same as usual, fujoshi claiming that their non-canon but fun favorite pairing is actually canon or implied or better than the canon ones, and guys saying they're delusional fake fans, but it ended up with the straight powerlevel obsessed guys saying actually they would NEVER act like these two with their friends, or arguing over who's the seme and who's the uke and over how the characters could use their powers to do inappropriate shit to each other like mpreg, etc. I wish dumb things like this would happen more often.

No. 1908784

>>1908778
As opposed to you sperging your shitty same three sentences over and over? No other thread is moving. You're obsessed and this is all you want to talk about.

No. 1908785

File: 1709369898633.jpg (1.21 MB, 1920x2784, 1699222644886.jpg)

Post tatas, ladies(derailing)

No. 1908786

>>1908781
That was me actually. I just think you're obnoxious!! You're malding over the word tit.

No. 1908788

File: 1709370023894.jpg (Spoiler Image,97.61 KB, 1080x1314, Shavkat-Rakhmonov-primo-piano-…)


No. 1908789

>>1908786
Got the wrong person, I'm not the brick wall.

No. 1908790

>>1908784
none of you have answered me though, that's why i keep repeating the question. You would rather insult me when i am being earnest and asking a genuine question because i want to understand how your brain works.

No. 1908792

man imagine being so offended i asked you a super simple question you start derrailing and infighting. This is why we cant have conversations or any meaningful discussion ITT. I have never insulted anyone i just asked a simple question that none of you can answer.

No. 1908794

>>1908792
>look at thread title
I'm not surprised people have brainrot and want to infight, are you?

No. 1908797

File: 1709370394811.jpg (43.73 KB, 828x652, 4fp37o.jpg)


No. 1908798

>>1908790
>>1908792
Set your own perspective aside and reread the replies. If you still can't get it, then maybe you just have to accept that other people walk on a different rhythm than you and that constantly repeating "but I don't get it, answer me, why can't you answer me" after people repeatedly answered you can get real annoying.

No. 1908799

>>1908794
they are acting like i personally insulted their moms and pissed on their dog's grave just for simply questioning some retarded tif meme

No. 1908800

>>1908792
I did answer your question >>1908739 you just decided you want a feminist manifesto from us to justify the use of one measly word

No. 1908801

>>1908799
they're lost in the sauce, don't engage

No. 1908802

>>1908792
You're the one infighting. You are fixated on this topic. Everyone else is responding lightheartedly because you continue to be ridiculous. I don't think you receive much outside stimuli, I bet your heart is racing and your veins pumping with adrenaline.

No. 1908805

>>1908799
Stop trying to garner sympathy and change the tone.

No. 1908806

>>1908799
You did insult people though?
Could you not tell that some of the stuff you said can be seen as a slight?

No. 1908807

>>1908798
all they have done is call me retarded and post shitty memes none of them have answered my super simple question
>>1908800
and i disproved it because i studied anatomy though, pecs arent the same as breast tissue so it makes no sense. I also made a comparison to men 'neutralizing' boypussy but you dont seem to have a real answer despite being the same.

No. 1908809

>>1908806
when did i insult people?

No. 1908811

File: 1709370680326.png (126.22 KB, 562x483, Screenshots_2024-03-02-03-13-0…)

>>1908807
I wasn't talking about pecs. They literally have breast tissue

No. 1908814

>>1908807
You keep talking in echolailic circles. Post hand

No. 1908815

>>1908811
so do skinny twig moids also have juicy titties too?

No. 1908818

File: 1709370823292.jpg (122.54 KB, 720x799, 1000003094.jpg)


No. 1908820

>>1908815
>answer the question you haven't answered the question answer the question you haven't answered the question answer the question you haven't answered the question answer the question you haven't answered the question

No. 1908821

>>1908809
I don't mean this as an insult whatsoever but are you fucking with me or are you genuinely autistic?

No. 1908823

>>1908821
He's autistic

No. 1908825

File: 1709370930156.gif (498.75 KB, 245x245, 64qf.gif)

topic is too long, gonna wait for the movie.

No. 1908826

>>1908821
I genuinely dont get it. I dont use twitter so the though of callign male pecs ''boobs'' disgusts me to the core because it makes me think of women and i am not gay kek. I just want to understand whats to appealing about it and why call them boobs instead of pecs?

No. 1908829

>>1908815
>Skinny moids exist so you can't say buff ones have tits!!!
Flat women exist too, doesn't make busty women not exist.

No. 1908831

>>1908807
Not true, you got one real response, >>1908520

No. 1908834

>>1908826
Oh it disgusts you to the core because you're a FAGGOT huh

No. 1908835

>>1908829
they have pecs not tits though. A flat woman still has boobs, a flat moid doesnt have ''boobs''.
>>1908831
so it is indeed terminally online irony poisoning?

No. 1908837

>>1908834
you are going to catch a long ass ban for scrotefoiling kek and all because i dared to question a terminally online coomer meme

No. 1908838

>>1908826
You've spent the whoooole time waxing about how misogynistic it is to call pecs boobs but now you're changing tune and saying it's because the term boobs disgusts you which is ironically misogynistic in nature. Please go walk directly in front of traffic

No. 1908841

>>1908837
Ooo nooo I'm so scared. Shut up faggot.

No. 1908842

>>1908837
not necessarily because a lot of tifs call themselves faggots so still women

No. 1908843

>>1908838
Maybe it disgusts them because it's a juvenile term a lot of men use. Can you not put 2 and 2 together?

No. 1908844

>>1908835
Yes, and pornsickness.

No. 1908848

>>1908826
i's a little hahahehe kakakiki joke. i didn't even come from twitter like what kek. i'm autistic and even i can tell. there's no "origin" because people have said that since god knows when
>inb4 well i've never seen that happen before internet memes
that would be a personal issue

No. 1908852

>>1908838
it disgusts me because i am not gay though, its not because of ''misogyny'' its retarded to pretend calling male pecs boobs isnt some form of closeted lesbianism. I find pussy disgusting too and it doenst make me misogynistic, it just makes me straight.

No. 1908853

>>1908837
You see, here you are calling it a "terminally online coomer meme"
This is implying that people who use the term are terminally online coomers, right?
People that use the term are here, we can agree with that, yes?
You are calling them terminally online coomers.
This can be seen as an insult.

No. 1908857

You people desperately need to be screened for autism this is genuinely embarrassing to read.

No. 1908858

>>1908853
but it is a coomer meme though keeek what are you on about you are literally derrailing the thread with your ugly 2D scrotes with pecs injected with oil and you expect me to believe you arent a terminally online coomer? c'mon you have been infighting beause i called your coomer meme term retarded

No. 1908859

>>1908852
And the truth comes out.

No. 1908862

>>1908858
I know which posts are yours in other threads. You are a deeply miserable and unlikable human being. Please pass away.

No. 1908864

>>1908859
let me guess now you are going to call me homophobic for not finding boobs attractive? you are starting to sound like those twitter trannies who get angry at women for enjoying yaoi instead of yuri because god forbid straight women dont want to see tits and pussy

No. 1908866

>>1908862
No, you dont. No matter how much you want a boogeyman there are thousands of anons itt and there are a bunch that disagree with you.

No. 1908867


No. 1908868

>>1908852
What is some people in this thread's obsession with calling women who are different from themselves lesbians? It's happened so many times I don't know what think about you people anymore

No. 1908872

>>1908867
nice you are adding alogging to your list of bans. Kinda proves you are a twitterfag incapable of adhering to some sort of imageboard etiquette.

No. 1908874

File: 1709371705595.jpg (163.15 KB, 1200x756, IMG.JPG)

>>1907314
Fair, that picture would be pretty retarded to remake with Katniss because there is no “official” version of her. The book just states she’s olive skinned and that can be interpreted way differently by people. The original of that is probably referencing Marina from the splatoon games. That exact scenario of the plush happened to her. Twitter users water down whitewashing but I think this is probably the least exaggerated case that’s actually happened IMO. But I don’t think that some merchandise or fanart that whitewashes characters is as much of a sin that it’s made out to be. It’s just 1 plush toy, it’s not the same as if suddenly in a new game Marina’s skin was that light. People want to be so upset they’ll call anything whitewashing like when someone was drawing the Indian character from Spider verse in “white people clothing” or Polynesian Star Wars characters having blonde hair which happens naturally in real life.

No. 1908875

>>1908858
This is a site that can be accessed by more than two people.
Just like you can use it, someone posting Sugimoto can also use it. That doesn't mean that the person posting Sugimoto is you or me though. It's tricky, but does it make sense?
>Also a "lol u mad" right after your earlier weepy "but I didn' insult nobody"

No. 1908878

>>1908872
I'm not a twitterfag and you clearly know nothing about "imageboard etiquette" freaks like you are always and have always been alogged for being annoying. The insufferable "enjoy your lengthy ban" means nothing to me you weasel.

No. 1908879

>>1908868
If your first thought when you see a man's pecs is ''boobs'' then you are at least a little bit bi.

No. 1908880

>>1908878
>freaks like you are always and have always been alogged for being annoying
is this your first day in lolcow? alogging has always been a banneable offense here

No. 1908881

File: 1709371851569.jpg (700.17 KB, 1133x840, 1706820950163952.jpg)

>>1908783
I find it funny when moids argue over shipping as if it's powerscaling autism like that kek their brains are really too simple. I've been watching Bravern with some mecha fans and it's been really fun to talk about it with non-fujos like that. That show is very overtly gay though so I guess it's a bit different and obviously bravern is the uke

No. 1908882

>>1908879
Oh my god your brain is the size of a pecan

No. 1908883

>>1908880
And alogging has been a driving force of imageboard culture. Clearly, you don't know much.

No. 1908884

>>1908875
it is still a coomer meme for god's sake we are talking about male's juicy pecs. I am no less of a coomer than you, i just dont use twitter so i dont get retarded modern slang.

No. 1908887

>>1908881
Whatever you do do not post Smith.

No. 1908888

>>1908883
goodbye sweet nonny might your ban be lenghty

No. 1908889

>>1908868
It's either you're a lesbian or a moid, apparently.

No. 1908892

>>1908888
I wont be experiencing any ban at all.(USER HAS BEEN PUT OUT TO PASTURE)

No. 1908893

File: 1709372037352.gif (131.05 KB, 1059x95, 1709288752101.gif)


No. 1908894

>>1908892
Because you will ban evade like you always do.

No. 1908896

>>1908887
Sperganons will have a heart attack if they saw those glorious mantiddies

No. 1908900

>>1908894
I actually rarely get banned. Glad you've finally fizzled out from your shitty argument tho. I'm sure you've just moved on to arguing elsewhere though

No. 1908901

File: 1709372406058.png (224.19 KB, 1200x848, 1706561325980829.png)

>>1908887
ngl the show's a bit bara for my taste but smith is still pretty cute. Also I love this art because I immediately saw the resemblance too kek

No. 1908902

Anyway I roll my eyes every time I get suggested content about queerbaiting. I don't care about millennial kweer academia fags and delusional shippers can go lie in the same tar pit too. At least shippers will admit to be crazy but the kweers pretending to be in a serious field of study or thinking they're actually making serious political commentary deserve to be mocked even more so. Obviously doesn't apply to legitimate cases but it becomes extremely hard to tell when it's sour grapes so often

No. 1908904

File: 1709372483470.jpg (964.9 KB, 1920x1440, Yuuki.Bakuhatsu.Bang.Bravern.f…)

>>1908901
I want to squeeze them so bad…

No. 1908907

>>1908900
no one was arguing with you, you are supposed to have disagreements but once you start insulting anons and derrailing the thread they turn into infighting. Anons like you are why the mods are going to lock this thread eventually.

No. 1908909

>>1908907
You can't gaslight everyone when they can go read upthread. Thank God your echolalia has ran out of steam.(infighting)

No. 1908912

>>1908910
ignore the twitterfags they will die on their hill to defend their stupid coomer meme. Next they are going to start calling dicks manclittis kek.

No. 1908913

File: 1709372916535.png (163.92 KB, 701x300, PrqvuK0.png)

>>1908829
retarded comparison, cause women who are "flat" still have breasts that function like breasts.

No. 1908915

>>1908912
I like them a decent size but I only say "dick".

No. 1908916

>>1908881
I need to watch that series soon, it looks fun. This reminds me of how Samurai Flamenco changed genres every 5 episodes and got super fucking gay in a plot relevant way that cannot be ignored at the end of the story.

No. 1908924

>>1908912
Hopefully there will never be a day when women get memed into liking small penises and copy sissy terms.

No. 1908936

>>1908924
NTA and i’m so sorry to say this but that’s probably going to happen with at least 1 TIF. They already try to engage with troon kinks because they’re into “queer culture” and calling their enlarged clits tdicks. I see it so much in the tranny NSFW art I have the misfortune of seeing. “Here’s Leon getting his dick sucked!” and it’s the worse anatomy you’ve ever seen with the classic awkward TIF erotic stiffness. And they’re into the sissy force feminization shit even though there’s nothing revolutionary about a woman wearing lingerie.

No. 1908944

>>1908904
i want to squeeze to juicy pecs

No. 1908945

>>1908566
Not about your titscourse, but
I hate with passion when male attractiveness is being called gay, like every time when men are good looking or sexy it is automatically homosexual
I hate retarded moids who can’t possibly comprehend the concept of other people - as if there are heterosexual women out there and the world is not revolving around male perception of sexuality wow
And women are doing that too btw: they will call any erotically presented man “gay”, fucking why

No. 1908953

>>1908945
be honest nonnies did you defend or bully the believers in middle school? i used to be in the ''justin is gay ecksdedeede'' bandwaggon until my dad, of all people, told me that just because a man dresses nicely doesnt mean he's gay. Weird as fuck coming from him but it stuck with me and after that i started defending the believers kek.

No. 1908966

File: 1709375745777.png (911.88 KB, 800x1159, 6HesRuU.png)

>>1908945
The weirdest part about that is how recent it is. Up until the 1970s, it was understood that men had to dress well and maintain themselves to be considered attractive. A fit young male was always considered the peak of masculinity, not some 40-year-old steroid gym freak or some fat hairy goblin looking moid.

No. 1908977

Any further derailing/infighting about titties/mantitties will get double the normal ban length. You know infighting is against the rules, report retards and bait instead of responding.

No. 1908993

>>1908966
sauce on this cutie nonnie??

No. 1909070

>>1908586
Marceline2174 and her Vamp/Werewolf OC is one such example. But the Masculine/over sexualize dark skin character paired up with the daintier/feminine lighter skinned character is prevalent across the board really. So I get why they're tired of seeing it in general.

No. 1909092

File: 1709390185370.png (405.37 KB, 500x2124, a-good-concept-ruined-by-immat…)

Funniest thing is seeing how much tumblr hates Vivzie's shows. I have a feeling that if Viv was a man tumblr wouldn't have such a negative response to her shows.

No. 1909095

>>1908586
I get it. Korra/Asami, Luz/Amity, and Marceline/Princess Bubblegum all fit this description (to varying degrees) and their canon, so they're probably influencing ocs.

No. 1909097

>>1909092
Lmaooo love how these aren't even characters in the show

No. 1909102

File: 1709391294306.gif (1.16 MB, 640x460, IMG_4126.gif)

>>1906336
I know this phenomena gets every other nonnie and their nan pissed as shit but as a regular old non-troon fujo, I actually love this shit. The memes can get annoying but I find the core idea of men getting fucked and objectified by other men the way men view women (as sex objects) to be hot. Is it this a perfectly feminist fetish? Lol, not really. Is it kind of funny and does it piss off moids in fandom? Yes. Does it get me off? Double yes. So, I don’t really care what anyone has to say about it.

The only downside is that it’s only funny when normal fujo women do it. Fujotroons using the ‘men pregnant’ meme is just sad and pathetic to watch, for obvious reasons. [Re: I can still be a manly faggot with a uterus! This isn’t cope, I swear!]

No. 1909106

File: 1709391671276.png (416.02 KB, 548x508, Screenshot 2024-03-02 150231.p…)

>>1908586
It is common.
Picrel isn't butch but takes on the "tough" persona masc/butch OCs basically have.

No. 1909107

>>1909092
If Viv was a man the complaints about the female characters lackluster character arcs would be even more prominent.

No. 1909109

>>1908586
I feel like this is way more common as a yaoi thing

No. 1909110

File: 1709391963874.png (1.8 MB, 1920x1080, vlcsnap-2024-02-13-23h18m13s90…)

>>1909092
That's so fucking petty and hilarious kek. There's so many issues in the show but it's like this person never watched an episode beyond compilations on youtube. I like to imagine these are frustrated oc artists who are dead envious about viv's opportunity.

No. 1909120

>>1909110
Sorry to derail but I watched Hazbin hotel as a casual Vivziepop disliker when all of a sudden that little picrel faggot enters left. Somehow, despite knowing his design is peak tumblr skinny white boy bait, I felt some stirrings of attraction but I just cannot fucking deal with the fact that he has no nose. It is so unbelievably discomforting, he looks like a rejected ‘welcome home’ muppet. Someone fix his face… god, please… the potential is there…

No. 1909121

>>1909106
Nta but I'd say that's just a side effect of Japanese beauty stereotypes manifesting in their art (and westerners who grew up on anime subconsciously recreating them). Traditional femininity being associated with being small dainty and pale (à la Yamato Nadeshiko) while masculinity with being taller and stronger (obviously) and being tan. Same reason why tomboys in Japanese media are all sporty, some-what muscular and tanned. And of course they apply those gender stereotypes to butch/femme lesbian relationships because they can't help it.

It's bizarre because in the west being darker skinned (as in tanned) is actually associated with more traditional feminity especially when paired with unnatural blonde hair. Women in media being pale are often associated with being a shut-in and having nerdy hobbies.

No. 1909164

File: 1709394362512.png (101.79 KB, 591x581, v-word.PNG)

>>1909102
Real and based. That one nona in unpopular opinions was right when she said that it's only cringe when you self-insert as bottom instead of inserting as top (or not at all).

>>1909110
I mean, they can still make their own show or comic if they think their ideas are so much more interesting and deep but the fact that OP only posts ugly scribbles and not even frequently tells me all I need to know kek. The ones that do watch and obsess over Viv's shows while considering themselves "critical" of it are even more annoying though. They are always arguing over such pointless shit in this super serious tone

No. 1909173

>>1909120
Kek, you're so valid, nona. Apparently Charlie and Lucifer are meant to look like porcelain dolls for some reason? But also some say charlie's meant to be a goat so I don't know.

No. 1909178

>>1909121
What do you consider "traditional" femininity in the west? Having tan skin is associated with more leisure time or access to the beach, but I don't think it's considered "traditional" in most places in the west.
Even then, the darker the tan, the worst the stereotypes about the woman gets, mainly of the sexualized, promiscuous variety.

No. 1909183

>>1909092
It's genuinely amazing how Vivzie makes people seethe this uncontrollably. It's never good faith criticism of the show either but just aggressive attacks against her character too, a powerful woman is everyone's worst fear.

No. 1909192

>>1909092
This shit is always the funniest part of these threads

No. 1909193

>>1909102
I love it too and laugh at the anons malding over one funny internet meymey. I will continue to breed my fictional anime boys as a woman and both the tranny tinfoil-sperg and the anti-mantits-sperg can cope and seethe about it.

No. 1909196

>>1909178
>>1909178
Traditional is perhaps not the right word, but definitely stereotype, especially when it comes to pop culture and media (and by consequence, fandom). Most current millennial/gen Z/gen X westerners who grew up on TV and Barbie and with other intensified interactions with pop culture probably see the blonde, tanned, pink-wearing makeup-caked female character as a symbol of femininity (though a sexualized on). This is contrasted with east-asian and more specifically japanese society where having darker skinned is considered un-feminine (and thus where reactionary subcultures such as gyaru exist).

As an aside, is there really a pop culture/fandom stereotype of femininity that isn't sexualized in the west? Japan has its sexualized gacha women but also its "submissive barefeet and pregnant waifu" stereotypes to choose from. I guess the 2010s badass warrior Mary Sue character would be one.

No. 1909216

File: 1709397108580.jpg (Spoiler Image,7.48 MB, 3000x3000, 1136812972.jpg)

>>1908586
I hate the way the OP worded this because now there are people thinking the issue is butches being dark skinned kek, when really the problem is how darker women have been portrayed in lesbian art in general, even when they aren't 'butch'.

>i keep seeing posts like this but never any actual examples of it happening

Sorry for the huge schizo compilation but it is a thing. I've been seeing similar complaints going around since 2014.
If you pay attention to lesbian art that has darker women, you start to notice certain trends. The people complaining likely noticed it enough times that it started feeling more like a pattern. If there's a darker woman, she's gotta be the more masculine one, or huge/muscular, or animal-like, or the protector, or… etc etc. And I don't necessarily want the opposite of this trope either. There are some people who obviously do that as a reaction to picrel, and they're the type to be afraid of offending people, so the art/story ends up being boring/bland/passionless with the feminine black/brown girl getting the most blandly 'nice' personality possible. I just want more genuine variety with couples with black and brown girls in lesbian art.

Note, I am not saying all this art in picrel is bad. I think a couple are cute and some are just boring. I just compiled these to show how there's a lot of it, and there's more beyond this but I only included popular art/art by popular creators I could remember, all lesbian/bi or gendie women btw.
There are also lesbian artists who like to draw couples like Pharah/Mercy and Suletta/Miorine where Pharah and Suletta are way more exaggeratedly huge and masculine or hell, futas (in which case I don't consider those artists "lesbians" at all).

The art I do particularly hate are ones where the brown/black woman is exaggeratedly huge/muscular next to a petite lily white girl, and the one where the white artist obviously has a fetish for being dommed by black women. Also the "barsheniqua" shit with a character from a popular wokie lesbian vn lol.

No. 1909219

i think mel/vi could be a good example of the white partner being more ""masc"" but nobody cares about that ship but me

No. 1909223

>>1909102
same, this is partially why i like traps so much. partially because i'm bi, partially because they do piss men off.

No. 1909225

>>1909216
I don't really give a shit about the discourse and I'm unfamiliar with most of that media, but I'm baffled by the aggressive sexual (pseudo-)dimorphism in some of those examples when those are supposed to be same-sex couples.

No. 1909230

>>1909225
well exaggeration in art is pretty normal, it doesn't need to match up to reality at all. it's also just a good visual way of showing who's the more dominant partner (historically, men in art are portrayed as being darker than the women – this is even the case in african art). i'm not saying it's right but that's probably where they're getting their thought process from, millennia of conditioning and etc.

No. 1909233

>>1909109
As far as anime/manga smut is concerned, yaoi, het, yuri, one character will always be darker than the other and sometimes it'll switch through the story. I figure its just a practical matter of being to tell the bodies apart and having a bit more variety.

No. 1909235

>>1909223
>traps
>piss off men
are you dumb? femboys are one of the most popular porn tags with moids right now

No. 1909237

>>1909223
Traps, as in actually a "make a girl and call it a boy" character and not just an effeminate boy, are a 100% male fetish and men love them, what on earth are you talking about?

No. 1909243

>>1909235
I could see it with reverse traps.
There should be more elegant happy to dress as they like and zero "urgh if only I looked good in a dress waah" type.

No. 1909246

>>1909235
>>1909237
as a content creator, i often get angry men in my notifs telling me to just make girls. i've also had people swipe my content and edit them into being girls. it's popular yes but plenty of dudes also hate them

>>1909243
nah from my experience reverse traps are (unfortunately) very popular with males. see kino, the precure girl, rika, etc. they only get hate if they're sakura ogami tier

No. 1909248

>>1909246
Just because one or two men dont like them doesnt mean traps arent a male fetish for men. There isnt a single trap that is popular with women the same way cute bishies like Link are.

No. 1909251

File: 1709399191092.jpg (352.83 KB, 1920x1350, FtBxSYnX0AAMzRG.jpg_large.jpg)

>>1909246
Really? I saw complaints being annoyed at pic related's anime announcement for not having the female leads mend their ways and get their pants wearing cured by the male leads.

No. 1909255

>>1909251
What's the anime called? I like the art style.

No. 1909256

>>1909251
what aminu? also i am sure anon means those crappy low effort tomboys that are basically just hyperactive sporty girls that blush at the thought of senpai, not real reverse traps like original King

No. 1909259

>>1909255
>>1909256
How I attended an all guy mixer.

No. 1909264

>>1909251
i'm just speaking from my own experiences, anon. i'm also not sure how what you've posted negates/disproves anything i've said

>>1909256
bit ironic that you'd mention king as if she doesn't have a shitton of porn/male fans. also no, i meant "draw boy call girl" characters like what this anon >>1909251 posted kek. men seem to like the contrast between the masculine clothing and the female body/the idea that a woman's dressing butch but secretly hiding massive cans

No. 1909272

>>1909264
why do you lie anon? men arent fapping to original reverse trap king, they are fapping to the newer uber feminine non-threatening aunt king

No. 1909276

>>1909272
You would be surprised. All some men need to activate their coombrains is confirmation that a character is female

No. 1909277

>>1909276
reverse traps are extremely unpopular with men, men would rather fuck a scrote in a dress than feel any sort of attraction towards a gnc woman

No. 1909287

File: 1709401235550.png (513.28 KB, 750x900, OflkyZm.png)

>>1909164
>>1909102
>>1909193
This isn't about fetishizing men, though. This is specifically about finding the whole 'get pregnant' disgusting, cause no man will ever get pregnant. Every meme that frames a male character getting pregnant as degrading, it's not actually fetishizing or demeaning men in any capacity, because that trait is solely found in women, and yes it of course gives TIFs delusion about getting pregnant and being true and honest men as well.

No. 1909290

>>1909287
There's a perfect vibe to post gnc women and you post pregnant deku.

No. 1909291


No. 1909298

>>1909277
I am speaking from experience from talking to 4chan scrotes, "confirmed female" really is all some of them need. They get off on the idea of a reverse trap secretly having huge tits or secretly enjoying feminine things and will only show that side to (You).

No. 1909309

>>1909298
Men will fap to a rock with eyelashes anon, that doesnt mean gnc women are popular with men. It's very telling that most scroteshit franchises like Fate and Re:zero have trap characters but not a single gnc woman. Men are fags.

No. 1909313

>>1908924
I have seen fics about lovin' the lil d, so it is out there, but they also always sound like a joke/mocking or subversion of the fanon of one character usually being mega hung or whatever. Hopefully it stays as just rare, weird crack smut and stays contained kek

No. 1909317

>>1909287
For every schizo starting this retarded infight again I'm drawing their husbando pregnant as a punishment

No. 1909319

>>1909251
>>1909259
I tried reading and so far it’s pretty cute but man I couldn’t help but ship the cross-dressing girls with each other instead lol, I’m more into their chemistry but maybe it’s because I’m a (butch) lesbian. I wish I could find more yuri with girls that look like this and with art this nice.
I find the dudes annoying with how often they keep going “OH NO AM I GAY/BI FOR FINDING THIS GIRL CUTE???” kek I’m only 12 chapters in though so maybe they chill out eventually. The interactions between the tan girl and the guy she’s paired with are cute though.

No. 1909321

>>1909317
draw him getting an education

No. 1909325

>>1909287
runawaysiren made a really good video about this. It's less about a ''pregnant fetish'' and more about women being socialized to see pregnancy as the end goal of all relationships. It's honestly sadder than just being a weird cock birthing fetish to be honest.

No. 1909326

>>1909319
I'm just malding over how the only time we actually get attractive GNC female manga characters they're straight.

No. 1909328

>>1909326
Sorry nonny next time will be yours just let us have this one for once i am so tired of shitty meek girly fmc

No. 1909330

>>1909319
Yeah I was pretty disappointed about them not dating each other or some other girls too. But at least they're cute and it's a comfy read.

No. 1909339

File: 1709403247130.png (264 KB, 866x861, Re_Zero_Crusch.png)

>>1909309
Re:Zero has a gnc woman.
They're meant to be a gnc couple.

No. 1909340

>>1909339
where? that's not a gnc woman its just a woman with a knight armor. Definetly not the female equivalent of felix.

No. 1909344

>>1909340
It is by anime standards please understand

No. 1909346

>>1909325
Frankly, I think that's bullshit. The vast majority of people will never see a pregnant man as anything other than a weird, gross thing or perhaps a sick joke. yes this is a fetish and you are jumping through hoops to pretend that it isn't one.

No. 1909350

>>1909344
it's not kek they couldnt even give her short hair god men are such insecure fags

No. 1909351

>>1909346
normie women are out there reading colleen hoover uber retarded novels that put scrote hentai to shame. Some people genuinely underestimate female autism.

No. 1909352

>>1909340
I'm just saying that's how it's written, its unfortunate about the art but it is what it is. I dislike the art so much it's such a bad fit, my god. Why would you choose an artist who can't draw gore???
Anyway, her implied more masculine appearance and character is actually kind of important, but it's a bit weird.
One of the female leads, Rem, also crossdresses.

No. 1909354

>>1909352
my point still stands though, men arent attracted to reverse traps the way they are attracted to traps. They will the catboy faggot in a dress but god forbid there is a reverse trap because that's actually gay.

No. 1909355

>>1909351
They don't have mammalian biology being overruled though.

No. 1909357

>>1909355
colleen hoover novels are way worse than any mpreg fanfic in existence

No. 1909360

>>1909357
I'm sure they are, but this is whataboutism, the overwhelmingly majority of people think men getting pregnant is weird, why is that such a triggering concept for you.

No. 1909365

>>1909360
i am just explaining that female sexuality is retarded. I will take mpreg over ddlg/bdsm shit any day though.

No. 1909366

>>1909365
literally no one brought it up ddlg shit but you.

No. 1909370

>>1909366
because female sexuality is literally bottom of the barrel garbage, complaining about mpreg is stupid when normies are consooming worse stuff and actually normalizing it

No. 1909371

>>1909354
It kinda sucks because underneath the visuals their relationship can be interesting in a "severely austistic codependency" sort of way but then they had to add that hideous outfit.

No. 1909374

>>1909370
nta, but this feels like this could have been writter by a redidt TIF.

No. 1909381

>>1909374
I've been suspecting we had one in here for a while now

No. 1909382

Don't bother. fujo's don't have a single defense that isn't some flavor of 'What about men who abuse real children?' and, in this case, 'What about women who are into worse fetishes?' I would respect them a lot more if they acknowledged they were just fetishists and demanded to be left alone.(fujo derail)

No. 1909386

Anyone else really aware of how some sperg pops up doing cartwheels about how it's acksshually really totally misogynist and pro-tranny every time men are being sexualized and demeaned to have an autistic shitflinging fit lasting for literally hours? In a thread that also has actual meltdowns over gay and nonwhite characters being included?(derailing)

No. 1909387

>>1909374
kek what? i never said mpreg was good, just that its less harmful than other bottom of the barrel fetishes that are more abundant and normalized

No. 1909388

>>1909298
androgyny in general will always be popular. people like contrast and being surprised, it's not really surprising that men love reverse traps/traps

No. 1909392

>>1909317
Draw him being captivated by a smug fat woman

No. 1909394

>>1909386
Yes lol. Also really obvious because of how lesbian is constantly used as an insult

No. 1909397

>>1909386
It is misogynistic if you’re using female terms to dehumanize and objectify women. I don’t care it definitely feels like sissy fetish shit. Can’t ever demean men without comparing them to women first

No. 1909402

>>1909386
feel to draw men in leashes acting like dog if you find that hot, but you can't apply female biology to male character and continue to assert that they are still male, and then act surprised when people call it out as misogynistic, I mean would you argue the same defense about "cuntboys"

No. 1909407

>>1909386
>doing cartwheels about how it's acksshually really totally misogynist and pro-tranny every time men are being sexualized and demeaned
I find the tradthots and fujospergs in this thread annoying but there's a point to be made if said sexualization is basically treating them like women or feminization/sissy shit. Horny women have sexualized men forever without the "babygirl/getting him pregnant/calling pecs boobs/etc" shit.

No. 1909424

>>1909370
No way a woman wrote this. You all out yourselves so much that it hurts.(scrotefoiling)

No. 1909455

>>1909325
Agree.

No. 1909488

>>1909402
it's fantasy

No. 1909490

>>1909216
these "lesbians" do the exact same thing in fanfics. for example with sevika they almost always turn her into a tranny / transfem. its disgusting. their desire to centre penis in everything baffles me

No. 1909511

>>1909216
the dildo licking one is so disturbing to me. Why isn't she licking her gf's pussy instead? And the redesigns of the purple and blue dressed ones are so ugly lmao.

No. 1909516

File: 1709412443338.gif (4.65 MB, 384x384, rika-pokemon.gif)

>>1909388
>it's not really surprising that men love reverse traps
They don't. Only women do. Hardly seen any scrotes that simp for Rika, Yuu Kashima, Haruhi Fujioka or Haruka Tenou but only big ass titty tomboys and short hair women like Ryuko Matoi or Tracer. More so if they feminized her in the male gaze having her in a skirt/dress with revealing skin and emphasis on the breasts to show her vulnerability like Tsugumi Seishirou. If you showed a reverse trap to a moid that look like straight out of a bl/yaoi or otome game they be turned off by it unless she gets sexualized in the moid gaze.

No. 1909517

File: 1709412540696.jpg (99.36 KB, 1007x465, finally some good food.jpg)

>>1909216
Anon I need the name of this artist pronto

No. 1909518

File: 1709412668392.jpg (115.67 KB, 750x728, 51aaba_1.jpg)

>>1909511
You don't have to get it kek

>>1909517
Pretty sure that's 82PIGEON

No. 1909521

>>1909516
I felt immeasurable rage when I saw moids immediately coomifying Rika putting her in lingerie portrayed with big tits and child bearing hips, they really can't bear a GNC female character ever and immediately need to feminize her, even their "tomboy fetish" meme is just about curing GNC women into prim and proper waifus with their magical dicks. Even worse, some anons on Lolcow defended the aforementioned Rika art and called her canon design tranny pandering.

No. 1909523

File: 1709412888276.jpg (227.56 KB, 2048x1152, 1000014834.jpg)

>>1909516
Remember when Rika won the Japanese yumejoshi contest twice in a row and left Gojo and Geto at the second and third place behind her this year? That was hilarious.

No. 1909526

>>1909298
I mean you're sort of proving the point though. The only way they can be interested in a GNC female character is they remove all of the GNC elements of the character. They don't actually like androgynous female characters, they like the fantasy of "curing" her and forcing a woman who resists the male gaze to be refashioned to their tastes. So in the case of King, they're definitely going to be drawn to her more recent feminine designs because that is their fetish, not her original androgynous design. Reverse traps are offputting to moids because they're not actually for moids, so they cope by making them hyper-feminine waifus.

No. 1909554

>>1909216
>The art I do particularly hate are ones where the brown/black woman is exaggeratedly huge/muscular next to a petite lily white girl, and the one where the white artist obviously has a fetish for being dommed by black women.
I've started to notice this too in both original and fanart femslash art. I think the real issue is that the darker skinned woman is always drawn more masculine and sexually dominant, not the fact that it's an interracial couple. (Since that's what the OP tweet made it sound like.) And how in spicy straight smut the masculine one is given a dick and they have straight sex, they literally can't imagine sex that doesn't involve a penis at all. If a female character isn't hyperfeminine she's basically treated as basically a man, I saw some anons point out that Arlecchino from Genshin is literally a feminine woman and not GNC at all, but I've noticed she's gotten the "he/him butch" and portrayed with a penis treatment.

>>1909511
It's just a dom/sub thing.

No. 1909575

File: 1709418643823.jpg (171.98 KB, 750x1000, flat,750x,075,f-pad,750x1000,f…)

>>1909554
Speaking of this trope and Genshin, one of the prolific f/f ships i.e. Beidou and Ningguang often draw Beidou with brown skin despite them both being pale skinned in the game, but of course the strong rough&tumble one has to be brown I guess.

>If a female character isn't hyperfeminine she's basically treated as basically a man

Kek as was proven here >>1909339

No. 1909581

>>1909121
Western and black Feminists have been talking about how black women are often hyper masculinsed and white women are seen as dainty. I’ve never seen Westerners talk about pale skin in connotation with being a shut in

No. 1909590


No. 1909610

>>1909575
>>1908586
It definitely is a trend in fandom, people just like to pretend it doesn't. The whole rougher/more masculine/designated "top" character being turned brown or tan when they're originally pale happens often with all gay ships in general (maybe het too but I don't follow those). Part of it is for muh representation and diversity reasons but mainly just because a lot of people in fandom associate darker skin with being more unkempt and aggressive, while pale skin is associated with being refined and aristocratic. So when you already have two characters fitting that rough vs. refined personality contrast people darken one of the characters to contrast it more. The same happens with another Genshin ship, Wriothesly and Neuvillette, you'll never see Neuvilette be darker than Wriothesly in fanart. I don't mind the trope as a whole but it does come off as having racist undertones sometimes especially if the artist makes the darker skinned character more animalistic when they aren't in canon.

No. 1909628

>>1909575
I've noticed that as well, but for some reason it doesn't happen nearly as often with Jean x Lisa or Eula x Amber for example. Maybe they do that without considering any implications because they simply want to change the skintones for the sake of it, but light hair just won't look as natural with another one and changing the haircolor as well would make the design too difficult to recognize or something?


>>1909610
Tbf Wrio had a darker tone in the first concept artwork but it's weird how people then also go out of their way to add stubble and other bodyhair and make him look generally unkempt when that doesn't fit his personality at all.

No. 1909638

>>1908619
I remember in my tumblr days I called a guy’s chest boobs and this TIF i was friends with got mad and said it was offensive

No. 1909639

>>1909638
The tives have evolved and troon nonsense is ever changing. Hence why I wouldn't worry too much about which words you like to use.

No. 1909655

>>1909610
I've also seen characters who are dark skinned in-canon get assigned the "dom" or aggressive top in ship fanworks.

No. 1909813

>>1909554
>>1909216
I think a fundamental issue with modern f/f ships, as well as m/m ships, is that they are overwhelmingly made by straight/bisexual women. Perhaps this wasn't the case a decade or so ago but it is the case now. It is inherent that they will apply typical male/female sexual dimorphism. This is not a new phenomenon, many real lesbian feminists have spoken about how straight women who pretend to be lesbians would have elaborate LARPs about being butch/femme, only to ultimately fail and end up sleeping with men.

No. 1909818

File: 1709443665740.png (859.64 KB, 1400x1561, spirk fujos in 1980s.png)

>>1909386
I agree. Traits that are inherently tied to women getting sexualized in fandom spaces is an interesting topic but I find it funny that some anons ITT think mpreg is a TIF fantasy when it has been popular among fujos since the 1970s/1980s.

No. 1909820

>>1909813
That and a lot of actual lesbians I know who make f/f content are pressured to be "inclusive" and add "trans representation" and straight sex in their stories/art. It's why I don't really like f/f ships anymore, if it's not rehashed heterosexual dynamics, it's straight/bisexual women with no natural interest in the characters trying to posture themselves as open-minded. I never thought I'd miss when f/f was more niche, but here we are.

No. 1909827

File: 1709445429373.jpg (175.86 KB, 1240x1754, peterg.jpg)

i love how they keep on being tone deaf, its kind of endearing

No. 1909839

>>1909818
I hate that anything historically done by and for fujos is getting associated with TIFs and their obsession to transing characters, no actual fujo reads yaoi or mpreg to see vaginas or short haired girls carrying babies. Yaoi has always been about whole ass men with cock and balls. Het fantasies are unrelated to yaoi, even if people could argue trans shit is so popular it may seem inseparable from each other nowadays, I wish they could keep in mind that doujinkas and fujo mangakas (so basically, the source material and the origin of shippers) aren’t making ship art with vaginas on it. Because it doesn’t actually, inherently, have anything to do with yaoi. 99% of fujos aren’t browsing the sasunaru tag for PiV porn.

No. 1909844

>>1909820
>That and a lot of actual lesbians I know who make f/f content are pressured to be "inclusive" and add "trans representation" and straight sex in their stories/art.
Unrelated to the mimicking het dynamics topic but I hate trannies in fandoms and yurifags that complain about the lack of f/f because of this (as a yurifag myself). Some fujos/hetshippers feel pressured to make f/f content because of retards complaining about misogyny so they try to appease them by "lesbian" content except it's always futa/trans shit. I don't expect m/m and m/f shippers to have any interest in sex without a penis and that's exactly why the yuri guilt tripping is annoying. It rarely ever leads to actual f/f, just spicy straight porn or boring fluff about women putting makeup on each other.

No. 1909899

>>1909820
wow, speak of the devil, because literally just now i saw some fucking tranny try to guilt-trip some poor woman into making futaslop ("transfem") content. this isn't the first time i've seen discussions around here about creators getting badgered into being "inclusive", but actually seeing it at work…truly, the male audacity is unmistakable. of course this was about a gnc woman too, as if any content concerning gnc women wasn't over-saturated with troonery and dicks already. why can't they just leave us the fuck alone.

No. 1909907

>>1909827
Is this not parody? kek

No. 1909909

>>1909523
based reverse trap king mogging the ugly flavours of the month

No. 1909913

>>1909818
kek gigaautism. I wonder why japanese fujos didnt develop mpreg autism, only the western ones.

No. 1909930

File: 1709457480603.png (22.17 KB, 1150x168, GCc5D54WkAAgQ00.png)

internalized misogyny is a killer. fake lesbians obsessed with men policing other women over their sexual preferences because they truly believe their shonen anime boy is supposed to be canon gay is wild. The teen girls sending death threats to kaira x sora shippers for getting in the way of their yaoi ship didn't go away, now they just police you with their badge of honor in homosexual studies even tho they would gag at the idea of actually touching another woman in the flesh

No. 1909935

>>1909913
Low birth rate

No. 1909938

>>1909930
modern anime fandom seems like such a cancer, even worse than the 00s anime fandom filled with speds. I am glad all these seasonal animus have ugly as fuck moids that filter me so i dont have to stand this shit.

No. 1909948

>>1909930
Hetshippers definitely need to be bullied more.(bait)

No. 1909968

>>1909930
Gojohime is a trash ship though, if you want to ship Gojo with a woman do it with Shoko or Meimei.

No. 1909979

>>1909948
So do gayshippers. Both have too uncomfortably thin skins in the current year.

No. 1909998

>>1909948
"Hetshippers" are just normal people who don't suffer from paraphilias.(bait)

No. 1910002

>>1909938
So you stopped watching anime post 2000? Honestly based.

No. 1910005

>>1909909
Are they really flavor of the month husbandos though? Since the JJK manga is still ongoing. iirc a few more female characters were in the ranking but I can't remember which ones at all.

No. 1910007

>>1909930
You could have made your point with any other fandoms like idk, Naruto and sasunaru shippers being spergs instead of enjoying their favorite pairing in peace but you picked the worst example ever. Gojo and Geto are pushed really hard by MAPPA while Gojo and Utahime can barely stand each other and not in a tsundere way. I'm talking about shit like openings and endings being written Gojo's or Geto's POV and being sappy love songs or the mangaka being inspired by specific BL manga when drawing JJK. Assuming if someone's homophobic or not just for liking a shitty non-canon straight pairing is a huge reach though.

No. 1910012

>>1910007
naruto and sasuke actually kissed though it mogs the shit out of low quality fanservice

No. 1910013

>>1910012
True but it was a comedic scene. Knowing that Kishimoto based their relationship on his and his twin brother's relationship is weird though, like wtf was going on in their family? I kinda feel bad for his twin being a less successful mangaka.

No. 1910016

>>1909979
>>1909948
No one wants to be bullied for their interests, that's why they tend to react strongly when it happens. No one "needs" to get bullied for shipping something you dislike either. Even when I feel very strongly about my dislike of some ship I won't go out of my way to ruin a stranger's day. It's annoying how people act like shippers force them to look at their posts when it's really social media algorithms that make it almost impossible to stay in your own bubble

No. 1910021

>>1909827
He would not fucking say that

No. 1910023

>>1909979
Same sex shippers already get to eat shit all the time and everyone tells them their ship will never be canon or even a valid ship since heterosexuality is considered the set default across the board unless otherwise stated, and even then they are screamed at for """sexualizing friendships""" if they ship a clearly implied romantic same sex couple. Hetshippers cry, scream and throw up making endless twitter threads about heterophobia (or "bi erasure" as they call it now) and being "bullied by the alphabet people" like a bunch of crybabies the moment someone says their ship is garbage. No, they need to be bullied way more than they are now.

No. 1910027

>>1910007
I feel I should explain this. I know it's a difficult concept to comprehend, but the vast majority of human beings are straight. Therefore, you can have deep personal friendships with people of your own sex without having any romantic or sexual feelings for them.

No. 1910062

>>1910027
Does that also extend to shipping characters that hate each other because that's how het couples are irl kek

No. 1910067

>>1910016
well this is the problem we are pretty much just forced to see ships that we dislike simply because everyone has to share the same space. decades ago we could have deviantart or livejournal groups dedicated to specific ships, so shippers could stay in their own lane but that's impossible to do now. you could just mind your business and look for fanart of your favorite character and be hit with your NOTP out of nowhere, and it doesn't matter if you blocked the ship name and their shippers. the algorithm doesn't give a shit about your actual preference and will shove whatever is popular down your throat. so of course after this happens multiple times some people are gonna get frustrated and leave a nasty comment to said shipper with a mentality of "i wouldn't have seen this on my TL if you didn't post about it"

No. 1910068

>>1910027
Unrelated to my point but ok.

No. 1910079

>>1910067
And then those people say "it's not that deep" when the random shipper gets rightfully upset over it kek children are so annoying and you can never win with them because they just don't care about anything but themselves. You'll be the idiot for arguing

No. 1910080

>>1910007
mappa knows their audience, they literally pair them together to make money. the odds of them becoming a canon gay couple in canon is literally 0, even fujos don't care about canon representation so both groups are as deluded as the other and it's not homophobia for people to not care about the extreme fujo pandering. literally every other shonen has it these days

No. 1910085

>>1910080
In that case I wouldn't say fujoshi are deluded because they're too aware of satosugu not ever becoming canon, they just willingly take the fujobait and have fun with it. We need another word to describe them. Someone being truly deluded would mean they actually believe it's already canon and not just hinted at for fanservice's sake. Believing Gojohime is canon or could become canon is equally delusional imo.

No. 1910086

>>1910085
but they do think satosugu is canon for real and they think both of them are gay representation.

No. 1910088

>>1909913
Wdym? My first encounters with mpreg were bleach yaoi doujins kek

No. 1910090

>>1910086
I haven't see that, just normal shippers who like that pairing with their own intepretations but that's because I avoid English speaking fanbases in the first place. I've seen plenty of non shippers saying that gojohime is way more delusional though on twitter, including plenty of straight guys who only care about battles and powerlevels so that was pretty funny. Given the spoilers I saw weeks ago it's not like satosugu can be canon, as in, they will date each other anyway.

No. 1910091

>>1910088
i have never in my fujo life encountered mpreg kek and i have seen some weird shit

No. 1910106

I'm not going to force you to drop it, but given that there is absolutely no point in rehashing the same arguments about fujos vs hetshippers, any infighting as a result of this discussion will catch long bans.

No. 1910114

File: 1709474286569.png (3.76 MB, 1400x1406, 17039024443567.png)

>>1909930
>>1909968
Every single weebshit has at least one male character that gets the town bicycle treatment. In JJK, it is Gojo, Genshit has Childe, and so on. It's honestly entertaining to see shippers argue among themselves over which ship makes more sense.

No. 1910116

File: 1709474589206.jpg (39.55 KB, 641x434, kira x gin.jpg)

>>1910088
Let me guess

No. 1910131

>>1910114
>the town bicycle treatment
I always forget that "town bicycle" exists as a phrase kek

No. 1910141

I'm out of touch with flavor of the month shit these days but what are the recent fandom cows these days? I remember todokaras and Andrea "Nicomaki" Ritsu or whatever his name is that were openly shit talked on the internet at large and not just here and on kf. But that's the most recent I can think of.

No. 1910152

File: 1709479260653.png (24.52 KB, 596x196, 545674.png)

>>1910141
She's my personal cow and has been posted here a few times.

No. 1910154

File: 1709479347439.jpeg (345.95 KB, 800x1200, 2F13DD72-AEAD-42F9-809D-47B81C…)

>>1909913
they liked magical baby acquisition, honestly. although if you really want to look, there is a LOT of mpreg BL. one of the most popular shoujo manga of old (patalliro) had mpreg as well. def not just a western fujo thing.

No. 1910164

>>1904893
ok tbf didn't the guy have the option to kiss his boylet friend, tho, he probably would be caught dead with a bisexual flag band

No. 1910166

>>1904876
did the artist get in trouble for drawing jimmy taller and trimmer, when he was fairly short and stock in game?

No. 1910168

>>1905134
i will never forget the fujo-in-denial behind A Matter of Life and Death on Tapas, having a crazy no. of chapters devoted to these faggots, and very willingly making sex scenes of these fags(that weren't even part of the storyline sometimes, she just did it) to then drop it bc of "asexuality" and "growing discomfort" of the series.

No. 1910172

>>1909930
gojohime is annoying because it has the worst possible tropes. people ship it because they have been brainwashed to think "woman angry at man" is peak romance

No. 1910173

>>1910152
give us a greentext why is she a cow

No. 1910176

>>1910152
Is she retarded in a normal way or is she genuinely crazy like the two I mentioned though? I feel like the few callout posts I see these days are just personal beef between 15yo kids on discord brought to social media and not shit like "he-I mean, she changed her middle name to her favorite Love Live yuri pairing" or "she fucked her dog" or "she raised thousands of dollars to make and ship a fanzine and spent it on personal shit, pretended she disappeared from the internet and posted Despicable Me yaoi fanart years later" like what I've seen before.

No. 1910177

File: 1709480969156.jpg (1.29 MB, 3024x4032, 1691841373837.jpg)

>>1910027
>>1909820
>>1909813
This is a whole other topic, but fandom and troonism have unironically convinced us that sexuality is innate, rigid, and cannot be changed. A straight man or woman will always be straight, and whatever same-sex media they try to create, whether it's m/m or f/f, will always carry those lingering traits of their inherent straightness. Even the pseudo-bisexuality developed between men and women, its different from each other.

No. 1910178

>>1910176
>she raised thousands of dollars to make and ship a fanzine and spent it on personal shit, pretended she disappeared from the internet and posted Despicable Me yaoi fanart years later
Please tell me this is true and who it is if so

No. 1910179

>>1910178
She had a thread on /snow/ but it was long ago so give me a few minutes.

No. 1910188

>>1910178
>>1910179
I'm back and found her thread again, despite forgetting her name: >>>/w/17713

As for her current twitter account, I just found it, her ID is @dyscotheque

No. 1910191

File: 1709481858649.png (164.81 KB, 680x453, 1705332320212.png)

>>1910173
>>1910178
Not a greentext sorry. Repost from an old thread but she's the peak fandom slacktivist in my heart. >>>/ot/1855561

No. 1910200

File: 1709482465439.jpg (555.95 KB, 900x1337, F_LaYrcagAAZADh.jpg)

>>1910191
Meant to quote >>1910176

Speaking of Nozmo, I think she's in the bg3 fandom.

No. 1910216

>>1910200
she should have stuck to the despicable me yaoi incest. Also i wonder if she's still muslim, that's very haram.

No. 1910217

File: 1709483465999.png (483.51 KB, 800x1035, tumblr_og7g9pB0c81vknzp5o1_128…)

>>1910200
I really liked her bg3 works, it felt like a fresh air from sterile safe boys love fanart nowadays. And now it's the same person who made Petunia Violet comic. What a wonderful small internet. She also has her thread on /snow, btw.

No. 1910222

>>1910217
i am envious of her improvement her new art looks like something a japanese artist would make, when her old art was the epitome of tumblrtard

No. 1910223

>>1910154
Ntayrt but do egg/magic baby/time skip really count? I thought the issue with mpreg was the act of pregnancy. Skipping it to just get to parenting seems like something else.

No. 1910225

>>1910188
Oh my gosh no way I used to read her comics back in the day

No. 1910242

>>1910200
whats her new handle? didnt she delete her previous account? i thought she stopped drawing altogether so its a surprise to see shes still around

No. 1910246

>>1910242
I posted it here >>1910188 but no idea if she's on other websites.

No. 1910251

>>1910088
>Mpreg
>Bleach yaoi doujin

Good ol' days.

No. 1910253

File: 1709485286249.jpg (87.56 KB, 500x400, tumblr_inline_p7gaepfH8m1qewv8…)

>>1910222
>old art was the epitome of tumblrtard
And that's why you will never be as good as Nozmo.

>>1910242
@sexgoldrevenge

No. 1910255

>>1910200
oh shit, she used to do a lot of twisted wonderland fanart. i hated her characterization, but her art style is really nice (even if every character ends up looking the same). crazy to know shes such a weirdo, wow.

No. 1910267

File: 1709485919128.jpg (156.26 KB, 736x736, life-death-9704.jpg)

>>1910168
Sad to hear. Understandable, playing safe as possible. Making sexual relationship is a skill too. Why bother and risk if just platonic romance works itself.

No. 1910276

Genuinely not trying to racebait (and I'm sorry of this has already been brought up for speculation) but I'm curious as to why it seems as though the average east asian or eastern european twitter artist is often more talented than the average western artist and I want to know what other people think about the phenomenon. Personally, I believe some people have this perception because they use twitter on the western hemisphere and are more exposed to the western side of twitter and view more varied content whereas foreign posts have to create lots of traction, i.e have many likes = be very good to show up on the western users' scrolling experience = narrow view of what the average foreign artist is really like. There is also this phenomenon of wokeshit that when is present in western art, in most cases turns it into pure garbage, as in titchop scars, slapping 495747 disabilities, mental illnesses, genders, pronouns and sexuality in addition to making them hambeasts to pander to 'marginalized groups' slapped onto random characters. I have never seen wokepandering by eastern european/asian artists from my experience, and because they are more focused on their personal designs rather than modifying pre-existing ones to pander to a crowd it seems as though the deviation allows their art to look better or more unique. Also, there is less censorship and dogpiling that happens in non-western communities for 'problematic' behavior like disregarding 'queer/poc coded' headcanons or just the general crime of badthink. In general I feel like western art seems worse in many context because of their hivemind obsession with looking politically correct and rabid cancellation of those who do not fit the current hivemind which drives actual good artists off the internet.

No. 1910288

>>1910276
western artists dont like to draw. The average eastern artist draws a shit ton, meanwhile you will be lucky to find one piece of art every 10 or so shitposts in a western's artists gallery. It's also why western animation is such dogshit. I can count with one hand the amount of talented western artists in the animation industry that are still alive, meanwhile you can go to anilist click a random animu and find 20 talented storyboarders and animators working on it. You would think the twitter accounts of big animation industry creators like rebecca sugar, pendleton ward, jk quintel and alex hirsch would be filled with art, but nope, its either shitty bad doodles or atttention whoring maymays like hirsch.

No. 1910315

>>1910276
How many times does this stupid "Russian and Chinese artists create god tier art while westerners are just LE GENDERSPECIAL SNOWFLAKE WOKIES" discourse come up? Unless you actually speak an East Asian or East European language and are immersed in their fandom on the same level as you are in the western one, you don't really have a realistic comparison. If you only speak English (and possibly some other major western language) and hatescroll fandom drama day in day out while admiring those exotic other artists on repost sites or their art accounts, of course you get a warped perspective. Slavic and Chinese artists are notorious for photobashing and tracing so they also get to produce seemingly high-quality work at a faster pace at they both have insanely schizo level drama in their communities with a terminal crab bucket mentality, Korean artists suicide bait all the time and nuke their accounts during their numerous meltdowns and Japanese artists will delete if their art becomes too popular because they're too afraid of getting a flood of jealous anonhate and being doxxed on 2ch. And all three major countries are constantly butting heads calling each other racist colonialists like that spiderman meme picture, especially Koreans and Chinese. And Korean gacha incels, that we have been through before. Just because they're not drawing your fave as a fat black transwoman (because they live in a monoethnic society for one thing) doesn't mean they don't have their own version of retarded fandom bouts and cancellations, if anything their dogpiling is even more aggressive than in the west.

Also Russians draw plenty of trans/gay/whatever headcanons too, only post-war a lot of west-minded liberal citizens escaped the country and are living in a diaspora because surprise, their country is a totalitarian dystopia.

No. 1910316

File: 1709488502731.png (1.01 MB, 1920x1080, tumblr_janellefeng_72278206470…)

>>1910276
The west is such a big umbrella kek. This east vs west art debate has been had and rehashed in this and art salt thread many times already. I think anons forget the accessibility of art education as a hobby. I hear Japanese kids are expected to pick up a hobby to be a serious skill like music, art, sports, etc. without pursuing that as a career directly. I think the website being western made definitely skews more kids western kids/hobbyists using the platforms.

No. 1910317

>>1910116
Nope, it was Ichigo x Ishida and Ichigo's dad x Ishida's dad. So they were step siblings dating. Wild.

No. 1910319

>>1910316
i hate frenchaboos so much

No. 1910327

>>1910276
I'm not an artist but I browse pixiv a lot and some Japanese/Chinese/Russian artists works on twitter. I think it's that the eastern ones still prefer beauty and for their art to be beautiful and don't moralfag about how liking beauty=evil. While the westerns do the opposite.

No. 1910328

File: 1709489284884.jpg (476.71 KB, 2048x1154, GCl6tWvawAAFVX5.jpg)


No. 1910329

>>1910276
I'm not sure about other people, but from personal experience the arts just aren't as big as a thing in education in the west.
In Japan and other mentioned countries there's more effort in teaching, not just illustration but calligraphy, so the base level is a bit higher.
Meanwhile art, home economics, wood shop, it all got cut/dropped as much as possible when I was in school.

No. 1910331

>>1910267
during that time i was a mogai handmaiden, but even then, i thought it was rather stupid to make such a smutty series as an "asexual", but looking at the state of things now, maybe it was for the best since she'd get loads of shit for being a straight woman writing yaoi.

No. 1910332

>>1910319
they prefer the term "Ouiaboos".

No. 1910335

>>1910328
why be into the ugliest faggiest baldiest scrotes?

No. 1910342

>>1910327
"beauty" lmfao. as if generic anime girl art is beautiful, its just a silly argument. there are plenty of western artists whose work is amazing, and i would even argue that the western comic book industry, for example, has many incredibly talented artists that frequently share their work on twitter/tumblr but don't get attention/notes because they don't do it "right" (such as glenn fabry). maybe their work is held back by just doing covers for superhero comics, but i have yet to see a manga, for example, manage to touch the beauty of comics like stray toasters or the artwork of alex ross.

if you're talking about fanart, its because a lot of the western artists you are posting are on the younger side. there are thousands of talented western artists that do professional grade fanart, just as the eastern side does. even on pixiv, there are thousands of horrible fetish art drawn by eastern artists and AI spam, its just you get a biased view on which get attention from the western fandom.

No. 1910344


No. 1910352

>>1910315
that anon is right, all the ''asian art pretty, western art ugly'' is just pure selection bias from anons.

No. 1910354

File: 1709490928783.jpg (1.8 MB, 2029x2976, berni wrightson.jpg)

>>1910342
seriously nonny? are you really trying to defend western art by using ugly scrote hyper detailed grimdark capeshit art as examples? at least give good examples like Berni Wrightson

No. 1910356

>>1909844
AYRT, I mentioned that later on in my post that
>if it's not rehashed heterosexual dynamics, it's straight/bisexual women with no natural interest in the characters trying to posture themselves as open-minded
I remember on Livejournal and early Tumblr, f/f was rare but the devoted female fans were passionate and actually gave a fuck about the characters. The fic and fanart was good, too. Now most female-written f/f is from women guilt-tripped to just headcanon two random women as lesbians to pair the spares, but they have nothing to say about them besides "they're so gay" or redraw the photo with two women putting on makeup as the ship. I'd rather have nothing than those performative scraps.

No. 1910360

>>1910329
Are people genuinely comparing Eastern Art students studying actual art with random fandom artists on social media? Like even with a meme school like Calarts people graduating there are still immensely skilled at what they do, it's just a shame that the school has become synonymous with the bean mouth pandering crap when that doesn't reflect the reality. Like yeah it's not generic moeshit anime girls that they draw but a different style of beauty and aesthetics. It's not like Japanese art students sit around drawing them all the time either.

No. 1910362

File: 1709491429056.jpeg (1.65 MB, 1988x3056, A8245C3C-E433-445C-B32E-B81E38…)

>>1910354
yeah? this shit is better than 99% of the ugly art styles i see in manga, be honest. there are tons of other talented comic book artists such as cliff chiang, greg smallwood, tamra bonvillian, frazer irving, even jordi bernet. i don't see the issue with praising capeshit artists, they are dozens that are extremely talented and overlooked.

No. 1910364

>>1909913
Anon, Japanese have tons of mpreg that came way before ABO

No. 1910365

>>1909106
What's this from? Looks super cute.

No. 1910366

>>1910362
Capeshit is just the western equivalent of generic moeshit, and i say this as a capeshit enjoyer. Capeshit is also extremely hard to pick up if you arent a turbo nerd while manga is very accessible and doesnt have 3 billion storylines. Also, capeshit artists cant into attractive males.

No. 1910368

>>1910360
I was thinking of grade school to highschool art education.

No. 1910373

>>1910366
Why are you talking like your on /co/? Also Tim Drake is hot as hell.

No. 1910376

>>1910368
nta but I'm from western Europe and I can at least say that I wasn't even able to take an art class during high school. During middle school all there was, was around 2 hours of mandatory art class a week for all students but as you imagine that was about as basic and useless as it gets when it's such little time. Especially as it was a class without homework so everything had to be done within those barely 2 hours a week. As for college here you cannot decide which classes you take so no option to take an art class either. Basically was forced to be self-taught during the years where dA was the biggest and there being a weird sentiment of using references being cheating or stealing which took me years to unlearn.

No. 1910382

File: 1709492537817.png (218.68 KB, 1200x759, FFayCiNaMAAXxNz.png)

>>1910373
he's hot in fanart, but in canon they almost always draw him ugly as fuck because western scrotes cant into attractive men. I will also never forgive DC for making a bishie figure line and sabotaging it by having only one actually attractive figure and the rest being generic statues you can find at a toy-r-us, while the female versions all have enourmous asses and thight fitting suits that show their midriffs and tits. You dont get this level of disrespect in animu.

No. 1910383

File: 1709492591490.jpg (65.3 KB, 392x960, 1308451896668.jpg)


No. 1910386

>>1910383
flat ass

No. 1910387

File: 1709492651823.jpeg (87.9 KB, 575x874, 15FDAB6C-05B7-4277-94AD-90A75A…)

>>1910366
yeah, i do agree with you. i just used some comic artists as an example because i, too, love comic books and many of the artists are very talented and overlooked. you get more variation, at times, than manga/manhua/ect. and more experimentation, and there are great content that is not limited to capeshit.

99% of comic book males are hideous, i agree with you there. some gay artists like moore travis and david talaski (when he isn't drawing ugly fat guys) can draw attractive ones sometimes.

No. 1910393

File: 1709492935571.jpg (55.57 KB, 800x277, lenore.jpg)

>>1910387
I just think capeshit is an awful example of good western art, not because they are bad but because superhero comics are extremly offputting and filtering to normal people. I would rather recommend non-capeshit comics like lenore the little dead girl or something like i hate fairyland for people into anime.

No. 1910403

File: 1709493571732.jpg (529.56 KB, 1192x1600, 1000008940.jpg)

>>1910342
I think nonnies like to shit on Western comics more because right now because people are more familiar with anime, but only know about capeshit when it comes to western art. I don't hate capeshit, but western stuff is more varied than that.

No. 1910404

File: 1709493704916.jpeg (1.19 MB, 2048x1441, B2C33C8D-9716-4E47-B653-5A26FC…)

>>1910393
in my defense, i did mention stray toasters, which is not a capeshit comic and instead just an experiment comic that was published by marvel. if i wanted to recommend more western comics with good or interesting art, i would recommend (off the top of my head) rork, my favorite thing is monsters, 5,000 kilometers per second, pretty deadly (bad story, but great art and ginny cannot be touched when it comes to cool female characters), paper girls, lone sloane, the incal, ext.

mainly, i just used comic book artists as an example because people were mentioning how american cartoon artists don't have any good work, so i thought comic book artists would be a good example of professional western artists that have good work that they share online.

No. 1910407

File: 1709493811459.jpg (83.49 KB, 585x792, beautifuldarkness2.jpg)

>>1910366
There's also a lot of good French comics that fly under the radar with a lot of people.

No. 1910413

File: 1709494035221.png (279.1 KB, 318x340, 1315216249003.png)

>>1910386
It's not flat, and bubble butts are for faggots

No. 1910414

File: 1709494106301.png (682.14 KB, 1080x669, examplee.png)

>>1910404
they are good but i dont think they would translate well to a manga reader tastes. The problem with western art is that the realistic style can be very limiting. People that shit on moeface doesnt realize its advantages compared to realistic faces, like how expressive they can be if drawn by a talented artist.

No. 1910415

>>1910413
hank hill ass. manga artists would have drawn him with a massive squishy butt

No. 1910417

>>1910376
Mine (american) consisted of just electives where the teacher would hand us a paper and tell us that art is about being free before complaining about not getting paid enough.
If they felt inspirational they'd teach us how blue and red make purple.

No. 1910418

>>1910415
mangaka do not give male characters nice asses.

No. 1910419

>>1910415
In what universe? Manga is full of flat asses.

No. 1910422

>>1910413
Bubble butts are for women

No. 1910423

>>1910422
true and based

No. 1910424

>>1910412
Is is. Such a nice fairy tale like story. I love stories that take place in small worlds like this.

No. 1910426

File: 1709494673517.jpg (197.8 KB, 528x800, d49tdps-d564f6cf-7fe7-4c9f-b43…)

>>1910419
>>1910418
my westaboo queen ricken always draws them with sexy asses

No. 1910428

File: 1709494766950.jpeg (141.66 KB, 500x1027, 6C56A3F8-E575-4DFB-87B9-A379B6…)

>>1910414
i apologize for the capeshit example, but the right artist can be really expressive in western comics. i do agree it would be hard to shill these comics to manga fans, and i would have to think on what to recommend. the story structure, character design and personalities, and just plotting is so drastically different.

No. 1910430

>>1910428
thats not a good example kek it looks badly drawn and retarded

No. 1910431

File: 1709494880920.jpg (163.93 KB, 659x1014, 1000008941.jpg)


No. 1910434

File: 1709494989486.jpeg (2.03 MB, 3975x3056, D0784300-3B9A-4FF3-959C-291423…)

>>1910430
its just stylized art. i don't think it looks retarded and poorly drawn, it is just supposed to look a little strange and exaggerated.

No. 1910435

File: 1709494998195.png (165.49 KB, 387x320, awooga glasses.png)

>>1910431
thats more like it source?

No. 1910436

>>1910418
Weirdly enough the only one that comes to mind right now is an isekai where the mc had a real big ass.
It wasn't gay or shoujo or anything, it was just mentioned here and there that he had a pretty nice ass and old grannies would smack it on occasion.

No. 1910437

>>1910434
it looks retarded because it looks like a looney tunes face slapped into an otherwise realistic body, it's why manga is allowed to go apeshit with the retarded expressions

No. 1910438

File: 1709495180388.jpg (127.6 KB, 735x1117, Daredevil 2019.jpg)

Some marvel comics look pretty.

No. 1910439

>>1910437
the art is fine. why is manga allowed to go apeshit with the expressions? most of the time it just looks bad when they try to be funny.

No. 1910440

>>1910439
It looks really uncanny when the hyper realistic face suddenly goes cartoony, manga doesnt have that problem because it's already extremely simplified and stylized.

No. 1910441

>>1910438
They're pretty, but sometimes they go a bit overboard and it's more of an abstract art piece than an interesting story, at least imo.

No. 1910445

File: 1709495696373.jpeg (155.9 KB, 500x687, 89E47A9A-3907-4E7D-B54B-82B5C3…)

>>1910440
i dont think the example i posted looks as bad as you're making it out to be, but i guess there some other good examples like nemi (which isn't capeshit). sometimes manga looks really bad when they do exaggerate expressions as well, or just look ugly in ways that are supposed to be humorous but aren't.

No. 1910449

>>1910443
it's not comfirmation bias though, it's something everyone who reads both manga and cape can see. Extremely realistic art IS very limiting. It's why if you are a manga reader its better to check more cartoony stuff rather than capeshit.
>>1910445
see, that works beause its basically manga simplification (big eyes, subtle dot nose and simple mouth) it's easier for the mind to fill in the gaps.

No. 1910450

File: 1709495901501.png (308.41 KB, 602x926, 1000008943.png)

>>1910435
Nightwing (2011-2014) #20

No. 1910451

>>1910414
Again as the nonas have said that's confirmation bias since I say this as both a manga reader and capeshit and French comics aswell some western comics have a very nice style even now and better written stories than some mangas(but again it doesn't mean it's generalising manga into being worse)but sadly they're getting flooded with ass shit skilled artists who've flooded the market with tard toddler calarts diversity quota artstyles and manga has it too with the isekaishit and moeblobs.there are countless mangakas who've taken inspiration from cape shit itself Zakk,murta and countless others.putting one over the other achieves nothing. The nipponese aren't some god gifted artists from birth they have different disciplines sure but it doesn't mean theirs better believe me if the western comic sphere began setting a higher art standard to entry most of these gendie comics wouldn't exist

No. 1910452

>>1910451
nonna please, use commas

No. 1910453

>>1910449
yeah thats fair, but i don't think making exaggerated, retarded expressions is what makes art better than other art. there is a ton of realistic comic book art that looks great, same as cartoonish ones too. not everyone likes extreme expressions either, more realistic manga styles are popular as well, so i don't think thats one of the sole reasons why you couldn't get a manga reader to touch a comic.

No. 1910457

>>1910453
i never said it was better though, i said that people that think realistic faces are better than more simplistic anime ones dont realize of the advantages of such simplistic styles.

No. 1910460

>>1910457
moeshit is ugly, though. i guess it can be very expressive, but there is other ways to do exaggeration in comic books with color and panel layouts that manga can't use (nothing wrong with them being in black and white, either) and doesn't. not every comic book artist i mentioned goes for a realistic style, but i do get what you're saying. some simplified mangas just look weird to me though, like komi can't communicate (especially with the weirdly realistically proportioned bodies).

No. 1910463

For some reason the only comics Ive really like are horror anthologies.

No. 1910465

>>1910460
>moeshit is ugly, though
4 u

No. 1910467

File: 1709496952886.jpeg (56.36 KB, 438x700, images-1.jpeg)

>>1910452
Comas are for commies
>>1910457
Although it is true simplar cartoony artstyles can make expression "easier" bur there in lies the skill of the artists there are many realistic artstyle mangas that portray expressions clearly aswell. Portraying a correct expression in realism is a feat every artist strives to achieve,it seems like you're comparing the easiest artwork to mimic ie the moeblob where as the realistic artstyle you call restrictive is much harder to achieve perfectly without tracing.

No. 1910468

File: 1709496978623.jpg (188.15 KB, 2036x2231, 1000008944.jpg)

>>1910449
Feels weird to call it manga simplification, I would say that comics came up with it first.

No. 1910473

>>1910468
the father of manga was a furfaggot and stole the idea of bug eyes from bambi ackshually

No. 1910476

What was the point in saying "not that I'm saying comics are better than manga"?

No. 1910478

>>1910476
shut up loser we are having an actual conversation for once dont infight

No. 1910491

File: 1709498474249.jpeg (245.27 KB, 1080x1350, roxy-in-my-style-v0-tm8f0tnug7…)

>>1910342
Yeah, I was talking about fan art since this is a thread about fandoms. But the western artists with ugly art are usually 20+, not that young. An example of a fandom I'm in is winx club, Russian and Japanese artists stay true to models or use realistic art styles with nice rendering, giving the characters interesting and creative outfits or drawing them the way we recognize them just in a different art style, be it anime or realism or a mix of both. While American artists and people affected by American politics make lazy ugly art and only care about changing the skin tones of the characters. Or draw them in unappealing tumblr/twitter art styles, with ugly modern zoomer fashion outfits. But there are some rare ones that make cute art though. Picrel is an example of the tumblr/twitter art styles I don't like, and it's worse that they made her fat. I've seen worse where they raceswap her as well because "white girls are lame". They also make Stella, a white blonde character, super tan and darker than the Latina character, Flora, because "white blonde girl bad".

No. 1910493

>>1910366
It's more an equivalent of shitty nekketsu shonen manga that have several dozens of volumes and the mangaka has no clue wtf he's doing in terms of story progression or pacing and doesn't have enough time to polish his art style so the only point of reading them is because of battles and powerlevel autism. Something that makes these manga superior is that you can just read the first volume, then the second one, then the third one, etc. but you'll still have "fans" arguing that you should skip "Dragon Ball" and just read "Dragon Ball Z" or equally insane shit, the same way comicbook fans will tell you that you should read some series in a specific order to understand the newest reboot of whatever.

No. 1910494

File: 1709498557557.png (376.39 KB, 456x668, 1692469853062.png)

>>1910491
Compare this to the most known Russian winx club fan artist, she doesn't have beef with the characters' skin tones and weights and draws them the way they actually look, and she mastered the official art style as well.

No. 1910497

>>1910491
from fashionable teenager to fat only fans hooker

No. 1910498

>>1910491
well, we've had this discussion before. why do you think americans draw like this? why do you think eastern artists don't? you know why.

No. 1910499

>>1910498
Yeah, that was what my original post about but some anon disagreed with me and I wanted to clarify what I was thinking of and referring to when I wrote my initial post.

No. 1910502

>>1910426
this ass is even smaller than the last one kek

No. 1910503

>>1910502
it only looks small because he has a massive fucking back

No. 1910514

>>1910365
Haena and Sora, it is very cute!
>>1910382
In canon they gave him his finger stripes ONE TIME and it stuck forever with the fans, clearly a hit, yet in official designs they leave it out.
Games do it much worse imo
>>1910328
This picture made my brain glitch for a minute.
It's a drawing imposed on a photograph with a painting behind that wasn't drawn by the artist

No. 1910525

>>1910276
Honestly? Because of laziness.
I noticed that whenever someone complains about their art looking bad and wanting tips to improve and someone suggests a book/course/DAB/something to grind at with a million "but take it at your own pace and don't rush yourself!" disclaimers you'll still get a crowd of people getting angry because how dare you suggest assignments to practice in order to improve and this is just a hobby!!! stop trying to make art boring!!!! This kind of pushback is always surprising to see especially in art spaces. I know art spaces attract different crowds but idk if that mentality is around in Asian and East European spaces. I can't speak for my region because the art scene is very small.

There's also massive selection bias, which Asian and East European artist are you taking about? I know that Isayama used to redraw his favourite manga as a kid but then he later went to art (or animation) school, that's not the same as a Japanese person who became an engineer yet likes to draw for fun (and might have an outburst if you recommend practicing perspective to improve)

No. 1910534

>>1910525
i still cant get over this old fart drawing for 40+ years and still being as skilled as a 15yo girl who learnt art through kooleen

No. 1910571

File: 1709502654153.jpg (223.34 KB, 1630x2037, 20231216_155106.jpg)

>>1910534
Yeah imagine being older and not drawing as good as some 15 year old haha

No. 1910576

>>1910571
how old are you? being 30 and not being super good is fine but being fucking 50 and drawing like that while having 40 years of experience is pathetic

No. 1910582

>>1910534
Okay I held myself back from derailing when I first saw this video posted but rough 47.

No. 1910616

>>1910403
source nonnie ? i'm intrigued

No. 1910636

>>1910582
he's 54 actually but yeah still rough
>>1910571
don't listen to her nona, everyone's different. it's ok

No. 1910668

>>1910534
15 year olds being so talented at art is completely new, though. there were far less resources back in the day to improve at such a quick rate like they do, but fuck this guy. there is just something creepy going on with him.

No. 1910810

>>1910491
if it wasn't for the character now being a fattie, the anus lips and the horrid fashion choices for a teenager (the choker, those stocking lingerie belts don't know their name), this wouldn't that bad compared to genuinely horrible tumblr fanart. like those with muddy colors, blush on every single part of the body, vitligo + acne + huge ass noses, made with the purpose of being ugly so it's ~subversive~. at least this one seems to take inspiration from 2000s flash games and doll box illustrations so at least it isn't made to gross you out (like a lot of "stinky goblin" tif art for example).

No. 1910882

File: 1709531392894.jpg (348.45 KB, 1761x1253, 20240304_065031.jpg)

>>1910276
I'm in a small japanese fandom and I can assure you finding art that isn't ugly is hard. The problem is that westerners make meme and woke drawings like the palestine shit go viral, while the asian art that goes viral is the most skilled and beautiful, so that's the stuff that is going to reach your feed.

I remember in the 2000s and very early 10s the western art scene being pretty decent, but the more people dialed up identity politics the more hideous fanart became. Western artists have no motivation to improve or draw better when they can go way more viral doodling blackwashed peter griffin saying trans rights in a void

That said if you dig you can find pixiv tier western artists. Pic rel

No. 1910901

File: 1709532483375.jpeg (246.77 KB, 828x1218, IMG_9601.jpeg)

I think it’s so wild that there are groups that organize themselves to mass report artists kek Gay porn artists of all things. Like you’d think they’d go after something bigger than that.

No. 1910903

>>1910882
100% agree. Also IMO its a lot easier to find talented western artists once you stop floating around fanart circles and try to find "artist's artists" if that makes sense. Fandoms/fanart tend to be full of clout addicted zoomers who don't really care about art for art's sake, there are a lot fewer highly skilled western fanartists who draw out of autistic passion.

No. 1910906

>>1910901
depends, how old the characters being drawn off?

No. 1910909

>>1910901
but what kind of gay porn? if its shota? good it should be banned. the age of characters being drawn matters if its some ol bara this is just retarded

No. 1910910

>>1910882
I know this artist and I think she does a good job overall, but tiny baby hand in this image is sending me.

No. 1910914

>>1910407
>>1910404
>>1910403
could someone tell me what comics these are?

No. 1910930

>>1910901
This google docs culture is the weirdest thing I've seen modern fandom spawn, who has time for this shit? It's like a cringier version of influencer notepad apologies, I don't care if the people in the docs "deserve it"

No. 1910952

File: 1709536185896.jpg (44.43 KB, 725x484, GHrm2P9bIAAB8R6.jpeg.jpg)

>>1910909
It couldn't have been that explicit if the person collecting the drawings could save them "as evidence" which I doubt would work as an excuse with actual CSEM. Interesting doc though, I didn't think moids engaged in this kind of petty behaviour over artwork they don't like

No. 1910958

>>1910930
Likely came up due to twitter's limitations and to save the very important info outside of a social media account that could get banned whenever

No. 1910965

>>1910901
>REEEEEEEEEEEEE WESTERNERS ARE CANCER UPON US FUCK THEM WOKIE WESTIES THANK GOD ASIAN ARTISTS AREN'T LIKE THIS
>The main culprit of this group is a Filipino drawing ugly wokeshit

No. 1911001

>>1910901
it's such petty vendetta. If they genuinely cared about 'muh children' they would go take down mossa cannabis whos 10 times more influential. Fucking speds.

No. 1911003

>>1910952
who even are the artists getting targetted? funny how they are only targetting gay accounts and not loli ones that are dime a dozen and more popular

No. 1911030

File: 1709542301915.jpg (Spoiler Image,215.17 KB, 935x1200, FtnqUjfaEAAnvoK.jpg)

>>1911003
All due to seething jealousy kek these people are bad at drawing and mad at other gay artists for having more skill.

No. 1911038

>>1911030
is this by a tif or a scrote? it's always the ugly old moid betas that seethe at artists drawing non post wall scrotes. I seriously doubt those targetted artist were even drawing shota considering the only good thing about elon's xitter is that it has a pretty good ai to detect loli/shota, they were definetly targetting artists drawing 17yo anime twinks.

No. 1911049

>>1910255
I was friends with her friends (never knew her personally because this was during her disappearance arc), it's not shocking. A lot of them were sickos on their privs, which didn't really come to light until one of them got called out for "problematic" DMC art years later and a bunch of them masked-off in solidarity, kek. Personally I couldn't care less since it's not like they were pedophiles but it was sort of funny to watch since the person at the center of it all was a TiF and the big artists (like Leslie Hung) also involved were lying through their teeth about how much of the stuff they were involved with.
Unrelated, I still like a lot of Nozmo's fanart even if the characterization is insanely off base sometimes. That whole group largely operates on multiple levels of abstraction from the source material because it's all raving headcanons between each other so it's nostalgic to see the obvious byproduct of it. I don't keep up with who she interacts with but I'm sure they welcomed her back openly as they always talked about missing her. They even found her lolcow thread at one point and kept up with it in case they'd hear something about their AWOL friend.
Sage for blogposting that I'm sure most people won't believe. I'm no longer involved with them because they're all TRAs or TiFs and I distanced myself gradually ages ago when I peaked.

No. 1911075

>>1910958
"The very important info" it's just petty fandom drama over drawings. Like what possesses someone to make an entire spreadsheet documenting problematic artists when there are actual pedos targeting children and discord groomers everywhere online. I get spending your free time laughing at lolcows, we're here for a reason, but they don't even find this funny they mald over it and think this is helping society in some way. Can't they spend their free time actually contributing positively to their fandom or go outside and touch grass

No. 1911083

>>1911075
this is the reason the average japanese artist mogs the average english speaking artist, instead of getting involved in vendettas they actually draw

No. 1911116

>>1911083
oh they do kek never forget the torepaku wars where a artist was almost pushed to suicide over using a fucking reference,don't want to start the East vs West tard wars again so no the Japanese art scene is as retarded as the west but we can't read it or it's mostly documented on 2ch or other forum boards

No. 1911156

>>1911116
Christ, fuck the Japanese torepaku bullshit. So many Japanese artists that I know have been cancelled by 2ch faggots because they used a pose reference, like imagine being the autistic son of a bitch sitting there scrolling endless amounts of pose photos just to spot one that's similar enough to claim plagiarism on and then raise hell over it while westerners circlejerk over how based and redpilled those japs are for literally never having any drama. Ridiculous.

No. 1911162

>>1911116
its not the same, in the case of 2ch is faceless NEET scrotes going after sucessful artists, in the case of westerners is other artists moralfagging about better artists while having art like >>1911030

No. 1911173

>>1911162
It's not "faceless NEET scrotes", it's their equal artists who are driven mad by jealousy and use torepaku bullshit to drive out the competition. It's literally the same crabs in the bucket mentality those evil westoids have, only they accuse them of plagiarizing and tracing instead of some made up social issue. But when it's all said and done it's still just them cancelling people over petty reasons and doing career ruination since in Japan if your reputation is ruined by tracing/plagiarizing allegations nobody wants to deal with you anymore.

No. 1911177

I'd love to hear more japanese artist drama. It sounds ridiculous most of the time, kind of like a time capsule to when western fandom didn't use social justice to cancel people or shut down the opposition.

No. 1911197

>>1911177
i remember one anime focusing on the torepaku side of japanese fandom scene where a artist kills her self over allegation on plagiarizing a character, allegations of torepaku are no joke in japan since most artists there are quite possessive of their "ideas"

No. 1911198

>>1911197
That psycho who burned down KyoAni's studio did it because he felt they plagiarized his idea so yeah it's no laughing matter.

No. 1911221

>>1911198
iirc he thought they plagiarized a very basic, common scene in the archery anime where the guys buy food to eat a sukiyaki or yakiniku, something that a shit ton of people do all the time. It's not even something very specific or unique where you could think his reaction is excessive, he must have been an actual schizo.

No. 1911235

>>1911116
>>1911177
This reminds me of the Japanese side cancelling over torepaku the Magnet illustrator until she left the internet while westerners cancelled anyone who drew Magnet over promoting pedophilia because Miku is 16 and Luka 21. The two sides of the jealous retard coin

No. 1911243

>>1911235
i will take being called a plagiarist over a pedo any day though

No. 1911258

>>1910200
oh hey, i follow this BG3 artist on twtr. i don't care about peoples' personal posts but i am curious, what is their history exactly?

No. 1911273

>>1910965
Filipinos may be from the east, but they behave like westoids.

No. 1911278

>>1911273
Fact: filipinos are the most powerful race in the world

No. 1911281

>>1910965
kek filipinos are burgerized as fuck, if you check their twitter you'd struggle to distinguish them from actual americans.

No. 1911331

File: 1709564051197.png (187.78 KB, 658x557, ibPao1C.png)

picrel is more or less what most AGP TIMs entire perspective on characters, all the women should be "hot and gay" for each other, and men(especially handsome men) shouldn't exist or be trans-girls themselves.

No. 1911332

>>1911281
There's also american filipinos, to be honest. Filipinos from the Philippines are far, far less politically correct.

No. 1911336

>>1911331
whos kuvira

No. 1911355

>>1911336
controversial season 4 antagonist from Legend of Korra.

No. 1911357

>>1911355
what did she do? i havent watched korra because i heard it just ruins the original characters

No. 1911389

>>1910914
The first one is Beautiful Darkness, idk about the other two

No. 1911408

>>1911357
Korra tried to be more "political" and each season focused on a villain with a badly handled political theme. The first season's villain was based on communism, the second season on religious fundamentalism, the third season on anarchism and the last season on fascism and militarism. The main villain is a military dictator literally based on Chiang Kai-shek who throws non-earth people into internment camps and talks about "blood and soil"

No. 1911438

File: 1709571020905.jpg (402.95 KB, 900x492, illust_78108471_20200613_11502…)

>>1911258
She scammed a bunch of people who paid for her doujinshi (of various famous fandoms and of her own work) and then she resurfaced when people found out she drew Despicable Me yaoi incest, which prompted a callout for incest and another callout for scams.
Long story short, don't buy from her unless you feel like testing your luck.

No. 1911475

>>1911438
>Despicable Me yaoi incest
what

No. 1911488

File: 1709573849903.jpg (92.49 KB, 1120x630, QauhYVo.jpg)

>>1911438
>despicable me yaoi incest

No. 1911492

File: 1709574050171.png (264.57 KB, 737x692, despicable me incest yaoi.png)

>>1911438
>Despicable Me yaoi incest
ummm hello, based department?

No. 1911499


No. 1911505

>>1911332
The comfortable middle class girls and women with umlimited internet access are too. Though males tend to be unapologetically porn brained.

No. 1911509

>>1911492
yeah totally, memeing yourself into shipping brothers from a children's movie, totally based and not a sign of severe porn addiction.(infight bait)

No. 1911512

>>1911492
Kek still love her

No. 1911515

File: 1709575012030.jpeg (184.43 KB, 750x1092, lmfaooo.jpeg)

>>1911512
its insanely well drawn i wish more of it was archived. I love autistic cringe but free art

No. 1911519

>>1911492
Why is the faggy looking one kinda cute though sorry nonnies I'll show myself out

No. 1911522

>>1911492
I love autism in women

No. 1911524

>>1911438
>>1911492
Her fanart are fun. I'd scroll her archived works.

No. 1911569

>>1911438
>Ougoku shipper
Disgusting, I hate seeing Ouma with someone as ugly and disgusting as Gonta.

No. 1911573

>>1911569
She also shipped him with Saihara if that's more your thing

No. 1911594

>>1910914
the second one is pretty deadly, not sure about the other two.

No. 1911630

I am so done with female-only spaces, they are so spergy. I am going to larp as a moid from now on.(posting the same bait in multiple threads)

No. 1911646

>>1911630
I've just quit trying to talk to fans altogether. Maybe I'll meet someone sane IRL one day but the online environment has deteriorated too much for my liking

No. 1911651

>>1911492
I remember when people were so angry and offended at this and i just found it funny as fuck. I love female autism

No. 1911657

I just think there should be some limits that should be enforced.

No. 1911660

File: 1709583567167.jpg (37.26 KB, 458x458, 1708141335051386.jpg)

>>1909521
You are completely correct about how men view tomboys. Pic related is Andi from Enceladus V. In 4chan threads, men talk about wanting to make her wear a dress and feminize her. What is the point of liking tomboys if you don't like masculinity in women?

No. 1911663

>>1911660
why are you on 4chan?

No. 1911668

File: 1709584146830.jpg (44.54 KB, 600x597, 1484437905315.jpg)

>>1911663
Do you know where you are?

No. 1911713

>>1911660
because the reason why men like tomboys is the caged bird analogy. men want a boyish girl to strip her of her expression and mold her to their image.

No. 1911720

>>1911668
This website isn't 4chan

No. 1911730

>>1911720
This website is an imageboard and crossposting with other imageboards is frowned upon but expected. Stop being a cringe tourist and integrate.

No. 1911735

>>1911663
Kek I guess anons in /meta/ were right about this thread being full of twitterfags

No. 1911742

>>1911713
unrelated but similar, so many guys want a woman who shares their interests but, in the same breath, need a feminine tradwife. They can't handle nerdy and masculine women because then they must confide that most are reflections of themselves. Maybe not the same, but sure as fuck destroys any semblance of an ideal dream girl. Men hate reality. They hate their perverse fantasies having real weight, seeing as some will stop at nothing to realize their debauchery. I fear for any OSA tomboy who dates these guys and forces them into a relentless game of do as I say until their hearts finally break. 
literally just the other day, one moid commented below some art on so-so helping a tomboy realize her "feminine" side. You'd had no idea how hard it was to hold back the projectile vomit in my gut. Absolutely gross. he was also the same guy he proclaimed all women were bi despite evidence to contrary. Surprising to say, he's a piece of work kek.
>>1911735
Explains all the moralfagging. You normally see this in your local twitter thread, not lolcow of all places.

No. 1911749

>>1911735
The first thread had people suggesting to remove the "twitter/tumblr" part of the OP because it kept attracting obvious newfags from said sites.

No. 1911831

>>1911749
We should do this for the next thread, please

No. 1911833

>>1911831
Twitterfag NEETs literally camp this thread and make a new shit OP the second it hits 1200 posts

No. 1911840

>>1911116
I had a bunch of JP artists who followed me before block me over some shitty joke about a pairing because it didn’t fit with their interpretation of it. They got so mad, they tweeted shit along the lines of “how dare someone make such a disgusting joke about our beloved (character).” I made a joke about him having a small brain. JP fandom can be just as autistic and retarded, it’s just about different shit than Western fandom.

No. 1911926

I said this in another thread, but it feels like twitter/tiktok fandom cringe isn’t nearly as good as old tumblr/deviantart. Tumblr and Deviantart was stuff like “Annoying Orange yaoi” which is funny and enjoyable on an ironic level. TikTok and Twitter fandom cringe is “OMG JJK guys are SOOOO hot!!! Gen Z is so crazy, we can fall for Fictional Men but we can’t ask for ketchup packets “ which is more rage inducing than funny, even on an ironic level

Farmhands please don’t ban me for the emojis, I’m trying to convey how these fandom idiots type(emoji autism )

No. 1911963

File: 1709608678623.png (44.16 KB, 527x502, 25a.png)

>>1911926
I remember posting like that about anime characters on tumblr when I was a kid minus the emojis, it's a little nostalgic. Also using too many commas,,,, and spacing the exclamation points !!

No. 1911974

>>1911926
I kind of miss the Deviantart/Livejournal/early Tumblr cringe. People like sephys-little-cloud and Zeriara would not survive in today's climate.

No. 1912049

>>1911926
Tiktok fandom is 90% just thirst edits. That's it. The same videos with the same effects in the trendy song of the week. You captured their lingo perfectly nonna, made me chuckle. Though this will die out with time, like the barking.

No. 1912064

File: 1709617411852.png (797.74 KB, 1524x1154, FLSAU8E.png)

>>1911357
The point I was trying to make is the fact that in fandom spaces you will come across so-called 'feminists', these feminists are not just naive libfems, but TIMs with a very typical pathology, they hate men and male characters, not in the way to which women hate men, it's just jealous Incel hatred and in their ideal situation men wouldn't exist and all women would be badass 'punk' lesbians.

No. 1912070

unpopular opinion but I do think "moralism" is good in fandom spaces, it should be enforced and the existence of "puriteens" is a positive sign that we should be praising exist.

No. 1912071

>>1911926
KEKKKKK

No. 1912072

>>1912070
you're retarded(infighting)

No. 1912074

>>1911492
>>1911515
these pictures are a good limitus test on how ensouled someone is. if you can't see the beauty in this, the earnest bleeding-heart truth and joy then you're a borderline NPC/normalshit

No. 1912079

>>1912074
I think you’re right

No. 1912083

>>1912074
Anons ITT will see pure unadulterated female autism kekfuel and instead of breaking out into side-splitting laughter they will moralfag. Just how dead inside do you have to be?

No. 1912084

>>1912074
>>1912083
As a joke this might be fine, but if you're really expecting me to take "Despicable Me porn" with any sort of sincerity, then I'm sorry but I won't be able to take you seriously. And if you want to call me a 'normie' for that then fine I'm a normie.

No. 1912085

>>1912064
these type of men are a disease, honestly. when they flood a fandom, they completely ruin it (look at the guilty gear fandom, where they discuss which character is a "puppygirl" in the official discord). they are incapable of making content beyond porn and polyamory jokes, and demands every character be a lesbian, while trying to hide its a fetish thing. you should have seen how many of them seethed over the male characters flirting with their ~total lil lesbian~ self-inserts in BG3, they are unhinged and unpleasant.

i think its incredibly weird how many of them plaster their ugly selfies all over their fandom accounts too, unless you're a cosplayer, i believe in fandom anonymity.

No. 1912086

>>1912084
>Ironyfag
Lol. Lmao even.

No. 1912088

>>1912083
irony poisoned
>>1912084
NPC

No. 1912100

>>1912070
I don’t know about “puriteens” being good for fandom as a whole, but the recent demonization of having a normal disgust response needs to be scrutinized more. Fandoms have almost always been a home to freaks with weird kinks, but there’s something insidious about calling anyone that doesn’t want to see mlp cockvore or whatever a “fancop”. I blame the troon influx for this.

No. 1912104

>>1912100
>Fandoms have almost always been a home to freaks with weird kinks, but there’s something insidious about calling anyone that doesn’t want to see mlp cockvore or whatever a “fancop”.
It's funny how those types always go on about how fandom/shipping isn't activism but if you don't like something they do they'll go on a 32 page essay rant about how their porn is radical queer liberation or w/e and you're an assimilationist bootlicker. The idea should go both ways but they only apply it to antis. I'm just here to look at fanart of my blorbos, I don't care about age gap ships being "pedophilia" or how your BDSM fanfic is totes feminist, why can't people be normal?

No. 1912107

>>1912070
"puriteens" aren't good at all for fandoms because kids shouldn't be in fandoms or on the internet in general. I can't believe what I'm reading.

No. 1912114

>>1912104
>I don't care about age gap ships being "pedophilia"
how old are we talking?

No. 1912119

>>1912074
Please don't let the atrocious term NPC be a default word for people who aren't terminally online.

No. 1912121

>>1912114
Not an fictional pair, I've seen a discord member being called out for 3 years age gap relationship with her gf a child predator. It took months of ostracism, mods of official server needed to intervene to prevent further harassment and doxxing.

No. 1912122

>>1912119
It is an NPC response to go "weird thing is weird and I don't like it, so it shouldn't exist". Just have fun looking at strange creations

No. 1912129

>>1912122
It's not, really. You stick out using that term.

No. 1912136

>>1912122
Your "let people enjoy things shhh" ilk is not welcome here

No. 1912140

File: 1709627131302.png (122.09 KB, 900x714, Screenshot 2024-03-05 002728.p…)

I never get this especially with silent protagonist characters, just self insert as the silent protagonist like a normal person.

No. 1912152

>>1911663
girls have always been on 4chan, especially /co/. Bad reputation aside it's the only forum-like site that is active by the hour. I like lolcow but if I wanna sperg about some youtube cartoon that just came out I'll go on /co/ and there's a 300 replies thread on there already

No. 1912153

>>1912152
Man, a couple years ago both /cgl/ and some /co/ threads had female only stuff (particularly stuff like VLD fell into this) but now even that's been taken over by moids…

No. 1912154

>>1912070
As long as it's constantly and exclusively directed at women being harmless like it is now, no it's not. When was the last time you saw a moid harassing living breathing children being called out? Never, and it's not like there's a shortage of those faggots around. I've seen actual callout posts describing heinous and blatant grooming and sexual abuse that never gains any traction because nobody wants to be the one who receives harassment from manosphere cunts protecting one of their own. Try calling out some degenerate fuckboy waving his dick at women and you'll get a Turkey Tom video calling you a liar and a clout digger between the lines and all his equally retarded fans will agree. But some woman drawing nasty porn that instead of you finding gross + blocking her you send a hate mob her way? Everyone will be like sharks smelling blood in the water.

It's not a goodwill moral crusade of cleaning up fandom spaces, it's a power trip and everyone knows it, nowadays they might even say it out loud, but nobody gives a shit. Bottom line, nobody genuinely thinks they're on the good side of history making things better for everyone, it's a tale as old as time to exploit the idea of purity to gain power. People need to learn to accept just blocking people and muting words as a valid reaction or they might as well just get off twitter because most likely they're into something someone else finds to be freak shit that justifiably needs to be taken down. Back in the day people laughed at things like Sonic Passion and clowned on it endlessly to the point it became a fandom meme, now that crazy bitch would've been called a confirmed pedophile (because Sonic is only 16!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and fandom kids would've been contacting the french police in hordes for fictional statutory hedgehog rape.

No. 1912155

>>1912152
And 295 of those replies are scrotes screaming about wanting to lick [female character] feet and pits or something, 4chan fandom threads are genuinely unreadable and filled with mental illness.

No. 1912156

>>1912136
Kek so you're on lolcow but you don't enjoy the milk? What are you even doing here

No. 1912157

>>1912156
Nta but it's clear the nona is calling out those twitfags who don't bother to integrate that force you to stay quiet than to see any critique of a thing they like by using tard terms

No. 1912167

>>1912157
Exactly.

No. 1912179

File: 1709631515243.png (81.09 KB, 929x647, 6bc0oZJ.png)

>>1912085
>>1912064
These TIMs serve as a good example of my point >>1910177, which is that aspects of their sexuality and paraphilias always become apparent. Take a look at how different the f/f ships written by straight women are like. They often comes across as wishy washy and almost asexual(picrel describes what I mean). Instead, it focuses more on the overall atmosphere and "vibes" rather than sexuality or romance, On the other hand when it comes to f/f ships written by straight men or TIMs, their interest in such material is purely driven by coom. basically for straight women f/f ships are an idealized fantasy born out of frequent disappointment with men. However, it can never be explicitly sexual since it originates from straight women, so they have to masculinize one of the women and also essentially give them a penis, on the other hand, for straight men and TIMs their interest in f/f ships, stems from envy towards normal or attractive men who attract women. They don't necessarily want to improve themselves to gain that attention, so they imagine a scenario where women are not attracted to men altogether.

No. 1912195

>>1912157
What? Why is anyone here to make thoughtful critique on why minion incest ships are bad? No one was shutting down nonas for disliking it and I don't think anyone actually likes it either, it's simply interesting to see what people come up with

>>1912070
Not the moralism sperging again. Can you answer how that would even be enforced beyond bullying women for drawing what they like in their free time

No. 1912207

>>1912070
puriteens aren't good, they are just jealous dramafagging teens. Whenever there is a google doc on an artist, it's always by a NGMI begginer who cant draw for shit and is jealous.

No. 1912212

>>1912070
The insistence of moralfagging that exclusively women and tifs have is what ruined female spaces. Why do you think only women ever get cancelled, by fellow women while men get to draw their loli guro skinning machines in peace. "Puriteens" are a disease that ruined women's spaces because they cannot for the life of them mind their business.

I say that as someone who used to be part of women heavy fandoms and when things got bad with Gen Z antis switched to things only moids like, I've never been more at peace and left alone. I sound like the baiting anon that rps as a scrote but I swear I'm not, I'm just talking my experience kek.

No. 1912213

>>1912074
> fandom kids would've been contacting the french police in hordes for fictional statutory hedgehog rape.
I hate this so much, these people must be so fucking sheltered to call everything pedophilia. I am not a CSA victim or anything but i have gotten creepy men in my dms since i was 11 to ask me for nudes, the only reason why i didnt get groomed like 4 times is because i was a retarded husbandofag, my mom had a weird ex that would touch my legs, etc. To see some artist or user(99% of times a woman) get acussed of pedophilia for liking a cartoon sends me into a rage spiral. These people must be so fucking sheltered, i envy them

No. 1912232

>>1912195
NTA I actually don't care what you think of grucest yaoi. You shouldn't use something as retarded as the term NPC to mean whoever you disagree with.

>>1912213
Kek. You're the kennyfag or something aren't you?.

No. 1912250

>>1912232
>You're the kennyfag or something aren't you?.
ex kennyfag. I still cant believe he saved me from getting groomed so many times. I should draw him again to thank him.

No. 1912334

>>1912250
What's this about Kenny saving you from grooming? I need all the deets, asap.

No. 1912347

File: 1709649360326.png (806.57 KB, 896x1122, 0Jvt3or.png)

Here's an example of why censorship and "moralism" are sometimes necessary, in the Western localization of Cardcaptor Sakura, Rika(a 10-year-old) and Tejada(a man in his late 20s) had an relationship where Rika had a one-sided crush on him and he rejected her but still tried to be a supportive figure and learned her feelings were because her father was absent at home. In the actual anime Tejada reciprocated that crush and they promised to wed each other when she was older and in the manga they were dating.

No. 1912355

>>1912347
god ew why tf is that shit in an anime for little girls

No. 1912358

>>1912334
>be me
>have massive crush on kenny from south park from ages 9-16
>friendless loser irl
>start meeting older men online due to my autistic male hobbies
>all of them older teens and grown men
>they inevitably try to groom me/hit on me
>i tell them i am not interested because i only love kenny from south park and they are ugly
>cleanse and repeat like 4 times, it happened a lot
I will always thank god and all the saints that i was an autistic shotafag fujo instead of some coquette ddlg shitter. I had a classmate who was a coquette with a tumblr blog and she got cohersed into a relationship with a college aged men because it was so glamorized back then(and still is). I also knew another girl who was a bit older than me that was groomed on a niche forum that doesnt exist anymore, she was also one of those lolilarpers coquettes. Absolute awful time to be alive.

No. 1912360

>>1912347
what does this have to do with women getting canceled for drawing 17yo anime twinks butt fucking though? do you only think in black and white?

No. 1912361

>>1912355
idk but it reminds me of Fruits Basket and how some of the teenage girls date guys in their mid 20s and it's because Natsuki Takaya herself is into older men so she was projecting that in some of her female characters. Like Arisa or Tohru's mother.

No. 1912370

>>1912360
nta but the post suggests nuance on the topic, nobody even mentioned 17 year olds… if anybody is thinking in black and white it isn't her kek

No. 1912372

>>1912347
>>1912360
They also removed all mentions of gay romances as well.

No. 1912373

>>1912370
the ''moralism is good ackshually'' is the anti fujobaiter. If you have been here long enough you start noticing the speech patterns.

No. 1912398

Repost from the western animation thread, The creator of Rose of Versailles is a member of the Liberal Democratic Party, which is the worst of all worlds. It's not really liberal, it's technically a conservative party that promotes the promotion of Japanese values and traditions. It also supports market capitalism but is also anti-censorship, allowing anything to be published as long as it's not openly advertised and while other mangekas aren't members, they do support it. Even a few porn artists openly support them because "freedom" to write and draw whatever they want and sell it are their main concerns.

No. 1912404

>>1912398
good for him

No. 1912418

File: 1709653354409.jpg (60.92 KB, 750x742, 1687982842819472.jpg)

>>1912347
Female fans tend to have the decency to curate their gross content and give warnings. I wasn't warned when I saw this cringe shit on TV. It's not comparable.
Tbh also I feel like CLAMP are an outlier and shouldn't be counted as some kind of standard for shoujo manga.

No. 1912421

>>1912418
>I feel like CLAMP are an outlier and shouldn't be counted as some kind of standard for shoujo manga.
pretty much every popular shoujo has some sort of weird age gap. Sailor moon is another big example, SCC is not an outlier is more like the more extreme version of it.

No. 1912423

>>1912404
Ryoko Ikeda is a woman and I understand why she'd be against censorship. Oniisama E is a work full of heavy themes and traumatizing scenes, for example (but unlike pedophilia in CLAMP it's shown as 100% wrong).
Plus Ikeda comes from a time where young japanese women were cultured and didn't need for media to be their moral guardians, and they could actually write good stories with problematic content painted as such. If anything she is the proof that writing about something doesn't mean endorsing it.

No. 1912425

File: 1709653942789.jpg (123.33 KB, 620x620, there-is-nothing-very-odd-abou…)

>>1912347
And how would moralism have prevented this exactly? You can say that it's bad to include this type if shit in media and I would agree, but the author, editor or publisher might say there's nothing wrong with it in their opinion. How would you ever come to a conclusion since morals aren't fixed? It'll just end up with the more powerful or loud person being right. Though that doesn't even seem like a good example, grooming is illegal and that's why it shouldn't be presented as something cute.

No. 1912429

>>1912421
No, CLAMP definitely is an outlier. The worst you can find in shoujo is a 10 years age gap between a teenager and an adult, while CLAMP makes it a 20 years age gap between a child and adult. They also write children as if they were adults both in personality and popularity and a lot of their characters are basically crazy stalkers but nobody in the story questions it (like Tomoyo in Sakura). There is a reason why their CLAMPisms are infamous and tend to be ridiculed compared to the average "I am a 15 yo student dating her 21 yo teacher kyaa" crap. The latter is an annoying blemish but will never compare to whatever drug CLAMP is cooking.

No. 1912435

>>1912429
Both normalize the same things, they are equally bad.

No. 1912447

>>1912435
I never said otherwise? I just said one is worse and also an outlier due to an infinite amount of reasons.

No. 1912449

>>1912447
considering that both target the same demographic i dont understand how a 16 yo dating an older man is any different from a 12yo dating an older man. I feel like anime is one of the reasons gross age gaps became super popular lately.

No. 1912450

>>1912449
age gap shit has been popular for forever, there's just more discussion/sperging out about it lately– don't think anime is the specific reason why

No. 1912453

>>1912450
there was a point in time where everyone agreed it was gross, then the 2010s happened, and now we have that gross jenna ortega movie that shouldnt exist

No. 1912457

>>1912450
This isnt exclusive to japan but age gap trash has always been shoved down our throats. You will rarely see reverse age gap shows/films/anime though. Literal moid fucking psyop

No. 1912459

>>1912418
You're joking? They're very famous for their shojo manga, and many other shojo manga have similar stuff going on for the sake of being edgy or giving a potential husbando to the teenage girl audience.

No. 1912461

>>1912429
>They also write children as if they were adults both in personality
Don't read Sugar Sugar Rune, the kids in that one act like they have a middle life crisis kek.

No. 1912470

>>1912421
>>1912347
I just think Japan has some cultural issues that are different from the west and people often forget that.

No. 1912471

>>1912373
You're right, I was almost writing a spergy retort but realized who it was and just scrolled past.

>>1912429
I was never a huge fan of CLAMP but honestly all their stories happen in such an alternative shoujo universe completely detached from the real world that it feels like a waste of time to apply real world logic into them. Kinda like the old Grimms' tales, if you start looking at them from the cultural context of everyday 2024 you're just going to have a bad time.

No. 1912481

>>1912470
Such as?

No. 1912482

>>1912453
>>1912457
I think it's gross (and also fucking boring when it comes to storytelling/characterisation- at least do something interesting with it if it must be present), but it's been riddled through media for decades with little comment. Guys either don't notice it at all or see nothing wrong with it (if it's something like a 40+ action hero paired with a woman in her 20s/early thirties), and if it's lolishit the more degenerate will act as if it's the same. Women like to include it in their own stuff for a multitude of reasons, and I've talked to quite a few women who like the female MC to be significantly younger than the male MC (and themselves) for self-insertion fantasy purposes (eg 16-18 year old student paired with a teacher who is the woman's actual age or near it). I don't personally feel the appeal but it is fucking everywhere so someone must.

What has definitely seen a big uptick in recent years is shit like ddlg– to bring it back to fandom nonsense, untagged ddlg/little has been a recent blight in a couple of the fandoms I'm in

No. 1912487

>>1912064
>>1912085
I was extremely confused over the ridiculous influx of really malebrained and aggressive "lesbians" in fandom spaces screaming about how much they hate the attractive male characters and they should all die to let the lesbians have the world and so on, until one day I actually checked their profiles and sure enough they were all trannies. Like there was a 16-year old rudefem XX with a k-pop avatar amidst the discussion every now and then but most of them were just angry trooncels and I'm disappointed in myself for not realizing it sooner.

>unless you're a cosplayer, i believe in fandom anonymity.

A dying thought tbh and should be brought back.

No. 1912488

>>1912421
Mamoru is only 2 years older than Usagi

No. 1912490

>>1912488
in the anime he's 21 and usagi is 14

No. 1912492

>>1912070
>the existence of "puriteens" is a positive sign that we should be praising exist.
No, it's not. Just because proshippers are degenerate doesn't mean the far extreme is good. Most "puriteens" have awful media literacy and a conservative outlook on fiction, ex. needing their hand held to be told its wrong instead of coming to that conclusion themselves. When I was a kid I stumbled on gross Sonic and Pokemon porn online, but my parents raised me better so instead of it "brainwashing" me to believe bestiality is ok, I just thought "that's gross, whoever drew that is a weirdo". I'm not a censorship/free speech absolutist because I do think there should be some legal limits, but I never see puriteens go after men who own lolicon fleshlights or mainstream media creators who direct movies with pedophilic themes. They always go after women who ship a legal age gap or insinuating a woman over 25 who still likes anime she watched in high school must be a pedo.

No. 1912494

>>1912421
>>1912488
Yeah Mamoru isn't that old, people just think he's older because he lived alone due to being a rich orphan and went to university because people in Japan can start university at 18 or 17 if they skipped a grade.

>>1912490
No he's not, he's 17 in the first season of the anime and 16 in the manga.

No. 1912498

Off topic, but can anyone explain the OP image to me? It freaks me out every time I scroll past it because of the weird facial expressions. Does she (I assume the one with a tanktop is some kind of fakeboy/author insert) actually want him to bite her and is taunting him in her mind? Is it some kind of creepy cannibal fetish thing?

No. 1912501

>>1912487
Fandoms are filled with fake lesbians nowadays

No. 1912502

>>1912498
iirc it's Mr Beast ship art of him and the one that trooned out or something, so you are rightfully disgusted kek

No. 1912503

>>1912498
its mr beast fanart

No. 1912514

I will never understand the age gap discourse between an adult and a mythical being/god that's hundreds of years old.

No. 1912519

>>1912514
kek just imagining someone posting something along the lines of “having a 375 year age gap is creepy and problematic imo” is killing me

No. 1912524

>>1912514
kek it's ridiculous, I've even seen people complain when both characters are a century plus and look/act like adults in their mid twenties. Or fights over if a character that'd been on ice for a thousand years was too old to be shipped with anyone or if they only counted as being the age before they were sealed away etc etc the fantasy age autism spirals ever onwards

No. 1912525

File: 1709659949384.jpg (134.79 KB, 1280x853, tumblr_4ec60266c01237fe7b55081…)

>>1912501
Online "lesbians" who have a million husbandos or "comphet" male celeb faves look like this to me.

No. 1912531

>>1912450
>>1912457
I think it depends on the exact context. for example as far back as 1868, the ending of Little Women caused a lot of complaints when Jo didn't end up marrying her childhood best frien, but instead fell in love and married an older professor. Jo and the professor met when she was 18 and he was in his late 30s. This storyline was based on Louisa May Alcott's own life, where she had feelings for an older educated man but never pursued a relationship. Despite this, young women sent plenty of angry fan-letters, so much that she Louisa May Alcott focused her sequels entirely on young people falling in love.

No. 1912534

>>1912531
>Despite this, young women sent plenty of angry fan-letters, so much that she Louisa May Alcott focused her sequels entirely on young people falling in love.
omega based

No. 1912536

>>1912347
I watched the anime subbed and I remember it was also just a crush there, it wasn't the west that censored it. I do know they didn't bring the character back because the voice actress died and they didn't want to replace her.
>>1912355
Ngl I never looked up if Cardcaptor Sakura was originally made for kids or if it just happened to fall down that line like a bunch of stuff did in that time. Devilman had a "for kids" anime as well, didn't it?

No. 1912540

>>1912531
samefag, In recent adaptations, they have made Friedrich Bhaer(the professor) more visibly attractive, so now it seems like the best of all worlds. However in the novel, he is described as a "stout German man," and Jo is only attracted to his intelligence and "maturity".

No. 1912543

>>1912487
Fujos, Yumejos, hetshippers and actual female yuri fans need to unite against our one true enemy: yuri trannies.

No. 1912545

>>1912543
yuri trannies creep me out so bad. I'd rather be friends with a hundred sperging fujos than a yuri tranny. Why are they all so obsessed with little girls

No. 1912546

>>1912487
>>1912501
real. i don't think there are hardly any lesbians on twitter anymore bc the algorithm pushes futashit if you follow one artist who draws f/f and she happens to mutual with some futard. abandon ship. a majority of the content on that site is geared towards male porn addicts from my experience. couldn't even browse bnha fanart without falling for some moid tricking me into opening gape hentai of ururaka. literally burned into my retinas. not to sound like oldmanyellsatcloud.jpg but back in my day porn was put behind locked accounts and it was considered being apart of an in-crowd or something. nowadays you get everyone shilling their nsfw art hoping to be the next big retweeted freak. ugh disgusting. the only "lesbians" left on that site are either antiporn radfems, have accounts made in 2011, or are het/bi women lying for clout because they think it's the "protection from men" sexuality as if moids have ever given a shit about that KEK, the only thing the men are repelled by isn't their fake lesbian sexuality, but the yaoi they draw and RT.

No. 1912547

>>1912543
They completely destroyed the fandoms of every media with a female majority cast.

No. 1912552

it always feels good when a bitch that tried making it on onlyfans fails and goes broke, makes my day.(derailing)

No. 1912558

>>1912552
What does this have to do with fandoms?

No. 1912561

>>1912543
I have issues with fujos, but they will never come close to even the 1/10th depravity of APGs.

No. 1912565

>>1912558
the onlyfans fandom

No. 1912609

>>1912531
kek her tastes in men were so shit she got bullied by her audience for it, I wonder how she felt about it.

No. 1912617

File: 1709667864513.png (926.2 KB, 800x1159, yiBDOxr.png)

>>1912531
samefag, I should mention the professor she had her self insert fall in love was based off poet and philosopher, Henry Thoreau

No. 1912621

>>1912617
why would you self insert yourself dating a neckbeard

No. 1912626

>>1912621
she was a fan of his essays and poems.

No. 1912631


No. 1912634

>>1906336
Kek so they agree that biology is real? how twansphobic of them

No. 1912654

>>1912429
Doesn't Sailor Moon have weird father daughter incest shit with Chibiusa? Aside from the infamous Rika thing I don't remember any other case of extreme age gaps in CLAMP, and I've read a few of their series. I remember back then a lot of 90s manga written by women my tween friends read was full of rape and weird shit (same thing with yaoi), I don't think CLAMP is "specially bad".

No. 1912669

>>1912654
>Doesn't Sailor Moon have weird father daughter incest shit with Chibiusa?
No. Chibiusa was around 5 years old when she first appeared in the series and IIRC she wasn't aware that Mamoru and Usagi were her parents in the future since she was just instructed to find Sailor Moon without any other guidance, so she was constantly competing for his attention with him being a father figure for her in a situation where her dying parents basically sent her to prevent the genocide of their people. Mamoru was always shown to be very uncomfortable with having a young girl be so infatuated with him too despite being casually cordial towards her, it was quite clearly portrayed as an innocent kid crush.

No. 1912677

>>1912654
In Sakura, highschooler Touya is in a secret relationship with his professor who is a woman in her early 20s iirc. Later on said woman ends up in a relationship with a 10 yo boy who is actually the powerful wizard Clow who disguised himself as a child (and still is in that relationship in.child form).
Another example I can think of is how in RG Veda, the protagonist is a genderless god who starts the story looking like a little girl protected by a handsome older guy and their relationship is implied to be romantic even at that stage (the god later turns into a teen bishie so you could easily paint it as grooming).

I vaguely remember Clamp Detective also had questionable age gaps but I forgot now tbh. The weirdness mostly comes from how all these pedo relationships are all okay and nobody finds it questionable, unlike other shoujo manga which tends to call out problematic behavior or show it in a dramatic way, especially in older shoujo.

No. 1912687

>>1906522
You're the only sane person in this thread, congrats

No. 1912691

>>1912677
80s shoujo was so based. I am honestly salty minako narita isnt more popular, most of her mangas arent translated

No. 1912720

>>1912546
>real. i don't think there are hardly any lesbians on twitter anymore bc the algorithm pushes futashit if you follow one artist who draws f/f and she happens to mutual with some futard. abandon ship
Futa has always been pretty common in anime fandoms but the current state of yuri spaces is literally unbearable. On top of fakebians and people calling their het porn f/f, you have to deal with people saying m/f ships like Asaden or whatever is yuri now. It's even worse if you're a "proship" yurifag because every retard in that circle is into trannyshit. Like I want to see actual problematic yuri not badly disguised corrective rape porn. Pretty much every NSFW "yuri" artist I followed end up drawing futa or started pandering to trannies so I've given up on being a himejoshi.

No. 1912827

>>1912677
>In Sakura, highschooler Touya is in a secret relationship with his professor who is a woman in her early 20s iirc. Later on said woman ends up in a relationship with a 10 yo boy who is actually the powerful wizard Clow who disguised himself as a child (and still is in that relationship in child form)
Just looked this up. According to the wiki:

>it is revealed that not only did Sakura's older brother Touya Kinomoto know Kaho, but also that they had an intimate relationship while she was his junior high school student teacher. Touya reveals that Kaho had broken up with him so she could go to England to study; she also told him that, in their next meeting, they'd be in love with other people

kek sounds more like she broke up with him for getting too old

No. 1912829

>>1908499
They hated her for telling the truth

No. 1912840

>>1912720
DA I remember that futa was always around, but it was always considered a niche, a fetish, or exception to the rule. On Livejournal communities it was always explicitly tagged and considered a "cousin" category and it was understood that yuri fans don't want to look at dicks. Now after 2015 or so it's been everywhere. Futa, breeding kink, etc. It's ironically so heteronormative.

>>1912546
I feel like they all left, including me. I lurk sometimes and the last time I saw a self-identified lesbian have decent takes, it turned out her "girlfriend" in bio was a TIM.

No. 1913102

>>1912720
>>1912546
on one hand you have "Sapphics" straight women who desire a dumb sexless aesthetic but on other hand you have severely porn-sick men with inferiority complexes.

No. 1913151

>>1912840
I think a lot of those people push weird niche shit into the mainstream also for the sake of being transgressive because they think regular sex between two women with vulvas, or two men with penises, or a woman with a vulva and a man with a penis, are just too "lame" and "vanilla" and "boring".

No. 1913182

haunted by the rumors that a portion of lesbians/bi women who draw futashit don't even enjoy it and are just doing it to get the troons off their case. the notion that some of us are so fucking weak-willed that we'd throw our own kind under the bus out of a paranoid need to sate a few entitled moids makes me sick and, quite frankly, ashamed. nobody's asking you to go full terf on main, but the absolute least you could do is not fuel the futa nonsense yourself. if not for class solidarity, then for the sake of basic self-respect.

No. 1913187

>>1913182
>weak-willed that we'd throw our own kind under the bus out of a paranoid need to sate a few entitled moids
Have you ever considered that maybe some lesbians are just good natured people being gaslit? People immersed in the LGBT community are actively told that being any flavour of anti-sex or anti-trans is an act of violence. I don't see it as weak willed lesbians throwing everyone else under the bus ngl it's pretty obvious what's going on

No. 1913201

>>1913187
sure, i'm willing to concede as much if it's just them parroting "trans women are real women" or buying into other kinds of pro-troon propaganda. but going to the extent of drawing/writing futashit they're actively uncomfortable with just because they're afraid of not being "inclusive" is taking it squarely into "no backbone" territory for me. not to mention that by pandering to their own detriment, these women are contributing to the very pressure they feel suffocated by and making fandoms an even worse space for likeminded women. i do see where you're coming from, but i just can't get behind it.

No. 1913213

>>1913182
I buy that somewhat, but I also believe a lot of futashit is written by straight women who are applying male-female sexual dimorphism, we the same happen to male slash ships.

No. 1913216

>>1913182
These rumors are pure cope. There are tons of women who make moid-tier fetish art because of exposure to it and developing their taste in that direction. It's not shocking that futashit is part of this.

No. 1913219

>>1913213
The weirder part is when the same people scoff at het ships, even more so since they don't just change the characters' genitals but also make them OOC to fit the most egregious straight porn dynamics.

No. 1913246

File: 1709723134305.jpg (248.07 KB, 1080x1503, 1000014833.jpg)

>casually look up a pairing on twitter in case I can find good artists
>see this
Gatekeeping isn't enough, wtf is this shit?

No. 1913247

>>1913246
Jjk is cringy shounen garbage anyway

No. 1913251

>>1913247
Doesn't matter because I've seen people do this with other very different shows or video games too but this is the most recent case I've seen. I don't understand how you're going to write a FANfiction if you're not a FAN of something and it's not for a commission.

No. 1913254

>>1913251
The "fandom" for the webnovel Worm is infamous for this, since it's long to read a lot of people just read the character pages on the wiki and then write fics.

No. 1913261

>>1913246
The absolute state of modern fic writers

No. 1913263

>>1913213
I'm straight myself and quite frankly find futa and it's sister cuntboys gross. Why slap sexual organs on differently built bodies? I get the taboo subject matter. Hell, in some cases it could be hot, but the only people I know who like it are either straight moids or pornbrained bi/straight women. I literally know like two gay women, one who draws futa and Another who kinda likes it but i'm not sure if she's joking or legit into it. It baffles me. Out of every sexual orientation on earth, lesbians are the least likely to crank it to futa porn. What is there to offer? it's a penis having woman defiling another. And the strangest thing of all is the sheer lack of futa on male porn. We all know a scrote would sooner die than be at the mercy of someone else unless it's soft mommydom crap. They hate the idea of lacking power so maybe that explains it kek.
>>1913254
I thought the whole point of fanfiction is being such a fan that one could write the most in depth ic ship fic imaginable? it's probably one of the reasons I don't write fanfiction unless it's a series that encourages elsewhere fics. You need to be fan of the source to write a decent fic. I can't believe some fic writers don't consume the material they base their stuff on. why even bother? you're just making something you're not passionate for which is quite frankly stupid.

No. 1913266

>>1913263
>sheer lack of futa on male porn
from the TIMs thread there does seem to be a genre of "futa on femboy" porn. if that counts

No. 1913277

>>1913266
but that's just a pedophile power fantasy of troons,the "femboy" is always drawn as a shota.futa should've never existed its so fucking disgusting

No. 1913279

>>1913263
I hate that I know this, but most futanari from it's inception focused mostly on "futa women" fucking men.

No. 1913280

>>1913182
>>1913187
Yeah anons on this site have spent so much time here with no grass touching that they forget how plenty of lesbians and bisexuals are fine with troons and think they're just doing a nice thing for their "trans sisters" by drawing a girl with a dick. All of the lesbian artists that I know personally are like this and the trannies they interact with are autistic as fuck but completely nonthreatening to them. It's really nothing more than that and I feel like most of the demanding for trannies comes from salty handmaidens trying to moralfag on people.

>>1913216
This. It's also easy to say that all the degenerate moidbrained porn is created by men but there are so fucking many pickmes pandering to them I don't know what to think about it. It's a bleak moment seeing some 20-year old girl drawing loli porn and having men way older than her lust over it.

No. 1913290

>>1913280
I won't say many of them are fine with it but rather many are forced to draw it so they won't get cancelled or harassed. I say this as a lesbian artist myself its truly fucking hard to keep a female only audience when you're a yuri artist unless you draw yaoi to filter them out. moids will always infiltrate your posts and troons trying to force you to draw futa by saying that it's so transphobic not to draw girl dick you are being a bigot!! Although I do hate the codling lesbain and bi female artists do to Tim's,the best course of action is to ignore them its truly infuriating and disgusting to see so much troon shit in lesbian art that I've stopped posting yuri att because I don't want it to be used for some troons fetish

No. 1913291

>>1913290
Just how many times have you been harassed for not drawing enough trannies? I genuinely have never experienced this myself and none of my other artist friends have either, just how large of a platform do you have to have to reach those FOMOfags to threaten to cancel and murderrape you if you don't draw more trannies this instant? I don't get it. I only get disgusting scrotes dropping repulsive replies at worst.

No. 1913299

>>1913279
I'd put that in the same league as tranny porn for moids who like dicks but "no homo". That being said, As A Bisexual I fail to understand the argument that "futa is the best of both worlds". If anything I'd say futa-on-female is the worst of both worlds, male gaze F/F but also with the phallocentrism of most M/F, if not even worse than most M/F. Unsurprisingly those who have to shoehorn penis into lesbian sex scenarios do so because cannot imagine any kind of sex without the almighty dick.

No. 1913307

>>1913280
again, i was specifically referring to the women who are uncomfortable with drawing futashit but who do so anyway for the sake of "inclusivity". i don't doubt that there are (unfortunately) a number of them who either don't mind drawing futashit, or who get some coomer kick out of it, but they are not the people i was talking about.

>>1913291
i have personally seen quite a few writers bombarded by "are you going to write transfem [x]?" or the more accusatory variant, "why haven't you written transfem [x]?". some women are more sensitive to the coercive element of such repeated questions, and being unable to outright state you won't do futashit lest you be branded as "possibly terfy" certainly doesn't help. however, i am still of the belief that caving into the pressure and creating futashit against your will is a disservice to both oneself and likeminded women. as >>1913290 said, the best tactic is to ignore them and carry on with confidence. by the way artist nonna, i'm sorry to hear about your experience. i hope you can gather up the courage to post f/f again someday, although i understand not wanting to engage anymore. fuck futafreaks.

No. 1913311

>>1913279
is this why so many brogressive moids love being pegged by a goth mommy? if so, lmao, so freaking pathetic.
>>1913299
and it's frankly nonsensical. Any sex that lacks penetration isn't regarded as true sex for whatever reason. Perhaps because of decades lesbian denial as well as the calcacave of suppression SSA women have faced. That's if men acknowledged they exist? Two women making out doesn't hold the same water as two men holding hands. As we all know, they'll get over their love of women and settle for a balding moid.
I assumed I was gay for hating futa, but as it turns out, I hated futa for centering on the male gaze not a woman's pleasure. Penis on it's own is fine, in places where it makes sense. When it's shoved in f/f, I absolutely hate it. Quite frankly ruins everything and then some.

No. 1913319

>>1913311
I'd say it's more like the oppression of SSA women stems from the denial of the importance of the clitoris and erasure/bastardization of female sexuality as a whole. Even in M/F contexts sex that is not PIV or PIA or fellatio is often seen as boring, pointless or downright shameful and emasculating for the male. Of coursr that also translates as F/F sex not being seen as "real" or "serious", at best maybe "just foreplay". This is also why moids love MFF threesomes with "girl-on-girl action", so they can have two women serve his dick at once without "having to bother with foreplay" either, since the "real action" is all about the penis. Also notice how so easily pegging got shilled compared to M/F cunnilingus simply because the former is another form of "pole in hole" sex (that still mostly stimulates the moid) while the latter is not (and actually stimulates the woman). To get back to the fandom topic it's quite bleak how smut fanfic even written by women for women, whether it's M/F, F/F or M/M, is borrowing more and more from hentai and mainstream porn for moids.

No. 1913328

>>1913319
Fanfic used to be the main ways for women and girls to explore themes aimed at women when the main source lagged on simple character writing, dynamics, and interpersonal drama. You wanna see two leads with far better chemistry get together? There's a fic for that. Wanna see two guys fuck? fic for that. You wanna see a elsewhere story about a Japanese vampire slayer? There's a fic for that. All you had to do was wrangle some tags and you'd find it. But these days, finding one that isn't riddled with troon, "queer" (read spicy straight), and braindead slop is like wading through a murky swamp for one nice flower. Since the new heads of fandom happily like anything gay, even straight with extra steps, no one has time to scroll down and find what they like anymore.
I want to read m/f and m/m in peace without having to deal with surprise pussy crap. If I wanted straight sex or gay sex, I would hunt it out, not receive it in the least likely place imaginable.

No. 1913332

>>1913279
kek i used to be into futa on male but like 99% of it is futa into femboy

No. 1913340

>>1913247
Then why make fanfiction of it in the first place.

No. 1913350

>>1913340
I can't even say it's for clout because I expect it more from artists drawing flavor of the month shit for engagement. I don't get it either.

No. 1913363

>>1913182
They sound pathetic af. Real lesbians shouldnt cater to men ever. I cant speak on bi-women though
I'm a lesbian and i am so personally disgusted by this shit

No. 1913364

>>1913246
Gatekeeping NEEDS to be a thing or we get gen z little shits like this. So lazy and pathetic

No. 1913410

>>1913182
>>1913201
To be fair, a lot of them make money off their art so there's a tangible risk in actively pissing off the mob. For the ones who don't, I just don't get it. I don't post my art on social media anymore but if I was asked I sure as fuck wouldn't cave. Even when I was a TRA/libfem I never cosigned "translesbians are valid" "genital preferences are bad" rhetoric.

No. 1913426

>>1913410
It annoys me so much how women bend down so easily. Moids will draw loli guro shit and also have fruitful careers and get supported and followed by pros,like mossa. A woman doesnt want to draw troons and she gets death threats and harassment until she draws trannies. I know it's not their fault but it angers me that they just let it happen while moids just simply ignore it.

No. 1913435

>>1913426
It's because women are held to higher "moral" standards than men and a lot of this is enforced by other women in my experience. It's why I see liberals decry JKR more than Orson Scott Card or Stephen King. I stay away from male-dominated communities but the loudest voices about "supporting transwomen" "making translesbians feel welcome" "sniffing out crypto-terfs" were from bio women.

No. 1913443

>>1913435
It's so annoying that women are held to insane standars when we arent the one murdering troons in a spac attack like moids do.

No. 1913567

>>1913410
you make a good point regarding art as a career complicating things, though i'd personally say these women need to understand that there's several steps between pissing off the mob and reluctantly letting them mold you into their own personal futashit showmonkey. there are ways to navigate this situation without creating content that compromises one's own boundaries and alienates women like themselves in the process. it is a delicate dance, but it's a necessary one imo. i also want to add: very insightful comments from all the nonnas here. i'm glad there's at least one place we can talk about this.

No. 1913578

>>1913567
It's insane how women get fired for saying trannies cant be women but moids get to maintain their jobs while being degenerates.

No. 1913985

File: 1709771654915.png (32.59 KB, 533x359, IMG_4116.png)

Reminded me of the conversation from a few days ago

No. 1914040

>>1913985
i mean, this isn't new. most LOTR "fans" i've met never read the actual books, but if you try to gatekeep within a fandom like that people usually get mad.

No. 1914050

>>1913985
This is why fandoms like LOTR and Star Wars are just gay roleplay fanart of whoever is hot

No. 1914055

>>1913985
I am into a fandom that gatekepts itself because of how hard and autistic it is, the downside is that its filled to the brim of turbo autistic trannies. There is no winning in modern fandom.

No. 1914060

>>1912347
IIRC Fujitaka (Sakura's dad) is an University professor and Nadeshiko was a high school student when they meet. So it wasn't the one couple with a big age range in the manga/anime.

No. 1914140

>>1913985
I'm not going to say this has never happened before because it did. This happens even beyond media fandom. I think it's fine to have different levels of interest on subjects, but it still boggles my mind that some people will waste a lot of time and effort into something they show no interest in learning about. It's like watching sports games every weekend and never bothering to learn the rules. It's noticeable when a fandom has a lot of people who don't consume the source material, just look at the fanfics and how shallow and tropey they are or if the fanarts are anything but sexy poses. I guess we like the feeling of belonging to a group, and the fandom provides that to some extent.

No. 1914155

>>1913985
I'd only understand if the original media is excessively inaccessible.

No. 1914220

>>1914155
What would an excessively inaccessible media even be?

No. 1914224

>>1914220
maybe soulsborne stuff where the game is difficult and most people have to rely on wikis to even get story and lore while playing the game

No. 1914247

>>1914224
That's fine if the person actually reads the wiki and watches some videos. At some level, they are interacting with the source material. If the person is aware they're an outlier and the media isn't made for them to be consuming that way, then I don't mind. What I've been seeing, though, is people who only know the name and appearance of the character and remove it completely from it's context and use them in ways that completely detach them from the source material.

No. 1914253

>>1914247
I agree that it is really weird to see people creating fanart and fanfiction for stuff they know nothing about beyond appearances. If you like the surface level (usually fanon) tropes and appearances that much make ocs

No. 1914281

>>1913985
tbh I've gotten into some fandoms/their media by interacting with fan material first while knowing nothing about the source material, though this tends to only happen when a fic author I really like either starts putting out new fics for said media or has a backlog of older works in different fandoms. It's kind of like picking up a random book in a genre and then being able to have a quick glance at a wiki to see what the characters look like etc if you want to or are confused about anything that doesn't get explained due to being fanfic. Wouldn't consider myself a fan or make my own content unless I move on to the original media and get proper into it, though.

Plus, sometimes I make fanart for friends' interests or commissioners without ever interacting with the media the characters are from, which might account for some of those 'yes' votes.

No. 1914314

>>1914281
Fandoms used to be spaces dedicated for fans. Actively participating in a fandom meant being a fan, as the name suggests. I wouldn't say just drawing a fanart makes you part of the fandom, but I can understand how "participated in the fandom" could suggest a broader interpretation. Taking from that perspective, yeah, I think most people have participated in a fandom without knowing the source material a few times. Personally, it never crossed my mind that I participated in fandoms when I drew comissions or fanarts for friends.

No. 1914323

>>1914140
The fanfic quality effect is definitely noticeable with BG3, Astarion especially. There are still fics that are well written, but there's quite a few that are ooc in a way where you can tell the writer hasn't actually played the game and just watches thirst edits on tiktok. Which is fine, but I don't know how you could be assed to write multiple 3k+ smutfics, yet not assed enough to play the actual game or even just watch a playthrough.

No. 1914360

>>1914040
I can understand people liking the movies after watching them and leaving it at that. I'm sure many of the people who answered "yes" can't even do things like this and just read a wikia page of some of the characters and a list of OOC headcanons on tumblr or twitter.

No. 1914364

>>1914220
Old TV shows with missing episodes because the studios destroyed the original stuff, thinking about Doctor Who's old series.

No. 1914625

>>1914220
What >>1914364 said, lost media content or maybe like old newspaper comics or media that got an adaptation but you want to be an nlog and be a fan of the original but it can't be found.
Or actually being a part of an active fandom in the making but it's not the early stages anymore so it's awkward to try and enter, like the North Park 4chan fandom. I wanted to be part of the autism but there's just too much with too little. The fandom is growing on itself like a cancer but newcomers can't really enter because there's no original media to go off of because they're making it up as they go.
I'm sure there are other examples of internet exclusive time sensitive fandoms out there but it's the only one I know of offhand.

No. 1914627

>>1906692
I thought it was more?

No. 1914667

File: 1709831500321.png (175.42 KB, 792x1325, 1709664251965.png)

Unpopular opinion, but I actually do agree with picrel. I know we're all expected to praise Rowling because she "owned the troons", but her work did have a conservative edge to it. It frames heterosexuality as the norm and standard, and it frames being a weirdo as something worth mocking. also she obviously believes that motherhood makes certain women better then others.

No. 1914680

>>1914667
kek I think they're looking into it too much. JK is a straight woman who is also a mom so of course she's going to make characters like that.

No. 1914691

>>1914667
Cool I guess, but she's still a billionaire who did something that people are still talking about and consooming for.
I think the problem that people have with Harry Potter and JK's works is that everyone expects this expertly written masterpiece with absolutely no mistakes or whatever else.
She must have a reason why she wrote what she wrote and the way she wrote, is that something evil that should make her get hashtag canceled, harassed and death threatened? Of course not, but everyone keeps acting like she's the monolith and the example for all women or something like that.
You don't get this level of questioning or nitpicking in Fandoms for shit like Sonic or idk, some scrote made story.

No. 1914695

>>1914667
I don't see the issue here?

No. 1914699

>>1914667
jkr sure isn't a super revolutionary radical feminist but i wouldn't call her cunservative, she's more on the liberal side of things. she also started writing the books around the time her mother died early so maternal characters figure a lot.
it's also a stretch to call hermione and mcgonagall maternal, they're smart and reliable but not exactly stereotypes ofmother hood. mcgonagall is always shiwn in a professinal role as a teacher, you never hear about her family in the booksand they're positive role models for girls imo.

No. 1914701

>>1914667
Rowling definitely has a strong affinity with mothers and family in general as themes in her writing, but I don't think it comes from a conservative place at all. Being a (single, struggling) mother to her children was always a huge part of her own identity so it makes a lot of sense to me that she would encorporate that into her writing, whether that influence was intentional or not. To her, motherhood and creating a warm, caring family environment are very important and so she values those same traits in her female characters.
I don't like it either and would have loved it if she included some more fleshed out female characters without those traits, but I can understand why it ended up this way.
As for the lack of gay representation, honestly it was the 90s. Most writers just didn't put much thought into including nonstraight characters the way they do now, even if they had zero issues with homosexuality.

No. 1914706

>>1914667
oh my god imagine if they dissected scrote books this way, who cares? trannies are so insane, and they are the same people to praise scroteshit with child orgies like stephen king's novels

No. 1914709

>>1914667
God forbid an author who is a mother herself put mother characters in her book

No. 1914713

>>1914667
This is so fucking weird and unhinged.
>>1914706
Seriously. Plus like half of what RR martin shits out has incest in it, and neither writer is particularily shocking as far as moid writers go, but god forbid a woman write stories that dare include MOTHERS, that’s the real issue kek

No. 1914721

>>1914701
>As for the lack of gay representation, honestly it was the 90s. Most writers just didn't put much thought into including nonstraight characters the way they do now, even if they had zero issues with homosexuality.
I also don't understand why everyone acts like JK Rowling wrote the books on 2000 and that she's a 20 years old zoomer.
Why isn't everyone asking why Julio Cortazar doesn't have any explicitly gay characters that makeout in the middle of the story? Everyone is just nitpicking JK Rowling because she happens to be sick of being told to sit down and shut up.

No. 1914726

>>1914667
don't listen to the anons here, you've got good points even if some things in the post are a reach. it's frankly bizarre to see so much aggressiveness targeted at the women not fawning over nearly every single female character of hers popping out 2.5 kids. if jkr's taking the troon mob in stride then she won't die from mild literary criticism.

No. 1914730

File: 1709836482822.jpeg (400.6 KB, 1179x905, IMG_2999.jpeg)

>>1914667
This reddit post sounds like they have mommy issues. Most women become mothers, that is a fact.
>she obviously believes that motherhood makes certain women better then others.
I read an analysis I agree with once that JK is more against romantic obsession like with the bellatrix case and voldemort's upbringing (his mother used a spell on his father) versus maternal/family love, hence why it is Molly Weasley that kills Bellatrix.

In this article (included screenshot) she talks about how she doesn't like the Draco Malfoy obsession. https://time.com/3644311/jk-rowling-harry-potter-draco-malfoy/

>it frames being a weirdo as something worth mocking

Luna Lovegood was weird wasn't she, if by weird you solely mean "doesn't become a mother" then I suppose she's not weird. Lots of the female characters were kooky!

No. 1914735

>>1914701
>honestly it was the 90s
Everytime people complain about the characters' names being stupid, generic or inaccurate I want to remind them that you couldn't just go on google and see if Cho Chang is an accurate or common name in Chinese back when JKR was planning the story like we can now. And regarding the gay rep in HP… It was obvious that something happened between Dumbledore and his evil serial killing ex bf in the last volume. If a 13 or 14yo speedreader like me successfully guessed that before JKR confirmed it in an interview nobody has an excuse, and when I say I'm a speedreader I mean I read the last book in like 2 or 3 days as soon as it got released. These same idiots also shat on the last Fantastic Beasts movie because "too late now it's not groundbreaking anymore" as if 50% of the movie wasn't the actual canon old men yaoi they've been begging for.

No. 1914754

>>1914735
i never understood why 'cho chang' was racist to be honest

No. 1914760

>>1914667
>frames being a weirdo as something worth mocking
maybe she was on to something

No. 1914769

>>1914726
>don't listen to the anons here, you've got good points even if some things in the post are a reach. it's frankly bizarre to see so much aggressiveness targeted at the women not fawning over nearly every single female character of hers popping out 2.5 kids. if jkr's taking the troon mob in stride then she won't die from mild literary criticism.
I hate that the internet can't just be normal about JKR. She's either Literal Hitler or Radfem Jesus, can't just be a good (but imperfect) author who's fun to follow on Twitter. Anons shitting themselves about how male authors are so much worse would have a point if anyone was defending GRRM while calling Rowling a nazi in this thread, but nobody is doing that. It was the mildest critique imaginable.

No. 1914789

>>1914667
Sometimes I read posts like yours and I remember even on lc, I should be prepared for out of touch posts that can't put things into perspective.
For fucks sake nonnie, she's a normie woman. Of course she's going to frame things this way. Valuing family and motherhood aren't inherently conservative traits, they're human traits. We're animals that thrive on forming close bonds with others. I know a lot can be said about the process of pregnancy, motherhood and all of that but at the end of the day a good portion of women will want to be mothers and you'll find these women on quite literally any side of the political spectrum. It's totally fine to critique these things that are expected of women and that destroy our bodies forever, but I also think it's utterly insane to frame motherhood and pregnancy as a concept as something conservative. Don't let tradthots and blackpillers rot your brain kek

No. 1914791

>>1914754
Because of people who don't speak Chinese and who say it sounds like a stereotypical racist name, like naming her "ching chong" or something like that. A few people saw how absurd that was as an argument so they decided to whine about Cho not being a Chinese name but a Korean name, which means to them that JKR is acting as if Korea and China are the same shithole, which is racist. Again, these people didn't think about how everyone is named like a fucking pokemon or an Ace Attorney character in these books and how you couldn't easily google names to check if they're commonly used in some countries and how to spell them like we can now. I've seen people also complaining because one of the major Black characters's family names is Shacklebolt. From what I remember the guy is far from being a racist stereotype and he's pretty cool in general so I never thought people would bitch because of his name having the word "shackle" in it but then again I'm ESL so back when I read the books I didn't even understand all the puns.

No. 1914827

>>1914701
>As for the lack of gay representation, honestly it was the 90s. Most writers just didn't put much thought into including nonstraight characters the way they do now, even if they had zero issues with homosexuality.
I feel like people forget how homophobic people were. It's not like many series back then had a lot of gay characters (and if they were it was often comedic stereotypes like the flamer gay bff) so I don't understand why that standard is placed on JKR. Even ignoring how same-sex wasn't legalized until the mid-to-late 2000s in most anglo countries, there was still a lot of stigma around having explicitly gay characters in childrens' media. She already had Christians in hysterics over witchcraft so I don't really blame her for not adding anything. Not like there was much opportunity to aside from having Dumbledore mention his relationship with Grindelwald or doing gay shit with Remus, HP wasn't romance focused in the first place.

No. 1914844

>>1914667
>Conservatives: JKR is a libcuck because she has gay characters and is fine with black women playing hermione.
>Liberals: JKR is a tradfag because she includes many motherly characters in positive roles (some are a stretch tbh, seems to be any women who are older, smart, or in positions of authority are branded 'Mummy')
I wish people were normal. Motherhood is not something conservative, it's natural. It's only conservative to pretend not doing it makes women lesser/is wrong which she does not do (eg. McGonagall is never mentioned having kids etc).
>>1914706
You're right kek.

No. 1914855

>>1914667
I don't even like Harry Potter or think JK Rowling is a literary genius or anything but this list is so stupid and making a mountain out of a tiny mole hill. It's a book about children and teenagers, of course there would be a lot of mothers since everyone has their parents still involved in their lives. I also don't know how you can call Hermione the "mom friend" when that's absolutely the opposite of her character. I agree about only non-motherly characters being the villains being a fair point but on the other hand this person seems to interpret as just an older woman being nice as "motherly", and obviously villains in a children's book aren't supposed to be nice. I think a bigger problem with female diversity in Harry Potter would be missing any GNC characters since all the women in it are fairly gender-conforming and even Enid Blyton did it before her in the 40's so Rowling has no excuse, but I digress.

No. 1914875

>>1914827
>I feel like people forget how homophobic people were.
Right, when JKR said Dumbledore was gay in 2007 there were actual articles and TV news reports of men with dumbledore tattoos regretting it becuase they had acidentally tattooed a GAY character onto themselves. Laughing at and/or feeling sorry for this "terrible mistake" was seen as normal, "of course no one wants a tattoo of a gay character on them! people might think they are gay!"

No. 1914876

>>1914855
Isn't Narcissa a mother villain character.

No. 1914896

>>1914667
>It frames heterosexuality as the norm
It literally IS the norm nona…
>also she obviously believes that motherhood makes certain women better then others.
The reason JK wrote so much about motherhood is partly because her own mother got very sick at age 35 when JK was just a teen, and she had just died at age 45 when JK only just started writing the first book. She is well aware of how valuble mothers are, and the pain of not having them around.
The other part is because JK escaped a very abusive relationship only when she got pregnant and realized she couldn't let her child grow up seeing mom get beaten bloody and get abused like that. Becoming a mother is what made her strong enough to leave to protect her unborn child.

No. 1914904

>>1914896
Not to mention the plot involves a woman dying to protect her son and family/a mothers love is a big theme in the series.

No. 1914906

>>1914667
Did you forget that JKR is a mother herself? She wrote these books with her kids in mind because she was a single mom. You taking issue with this at all just shows your level of maturity. She is absolutely not a conservative.

No. 1914910

>>1914706
>>1914713
I'm telling you, the way people go after female writers is unhinged. Male writers write literal rape, incest and worse and everyone praises them to high hell. RR Martin is a huge one. I cant stand him, his writing, or the fans who would eat his shit if he told them to do so.

No. 1914913

>>1914896
>>It frames heterosexuality as the norm
>It literally IS the norm nona…
I agree with you so hard. anon sounds like a brain dead gendie. I'm a lesbian myself, but if someone really thinks heterosexuality isnt the majority, despite the gendie agenda, they are retarded. I dont expect to be catered to. JKR is a straight woman and a mother. She is going to write from her experiences alone.

No. 1914924

>>1914875
I'm not a JKR simp but it annoys me how people write off her confirming Dumbledore as gay as something she did just for meaningless performative brownie points. If she said it today then sure, but in 2007 I feel like that was a big thing since it wasn't even necessary for her to. American democrats and Obama himself didn't even support gay marriage until 2010 or something. The landscape for gay people is completely different from now and pre-2010 but people act like her thing with Dumbledore is the same thing as Disney making their "first gay character" every 2 movies to look inclusive and because it's not as controversial to do now.

No. 1914929

>>1914876
Walburga Black is also probably the most racist and mean spirited character the book had kek

No. 1914977

>>1914667
>and she's really judgy on what counts as a woman
I want gender ideology to die.

No. 1914992

>>1914667
>frames being a weirdo as something worth mocking
Gonna have to ask you to elaborate on that cause I'm not sure what you're talking about.

No. 1914997

>>1914726
what >>1914769 she has the views of a moderate liberal, they are not radical one way or the other.

No. 1915292

>>1914924
I was in high school back then and tons of people were legit pissed about it. I heard talk in real life about how JKR made him a pedophile or that he was grooming Harry in the books even though he was in love with Grindlewald (a grown man). I get how it felt like an asspull to reveal it posthumously in the 2010s, but Harry Potter already got enough evangelical backlash in the late 90s and 00s for "promoting witchcraft", if Dumbledore was gay in the book it would've gotten a lot worse.

No. 1915321

>>1915292
wasn't even a fujo at the time but it was so blindingly apparent that Dumbledore was in love with Grindelwald that I was genuinely surprised people, even now, still considered it a big reveal instead of her just confirming pretty obvious gay subtext. for all the fandom takes nowadays about how canonically straight characters are actually "totally L/G/B/T coded to avoid censorship!!" or whatever, you'd think people would recognize a character that was actually gay but written to avoid censorship

No. 1915514

>>1914667
I've read the books when I was young, so I don't remember it as well, but wasn't the reson why Voldemort was an irredeemable evil person because he was born from untrue love and his mother abandoned him? Wouldn't Merope be a bad mother and the source of the evil in the series?
>>1914924
I thought it was weird that she said Dumbledore was gay right after she published the book he died tbh. Why take the corpse out of the closet kek? It just felt like an information that didn't play any role in the story.

No. 1915547

>>1914855
>I think a bigger problem with female diversity in Harry Potter would be missing any GNC characters
i'm sorry nona, but does it really matter

No. 1915671

Don't forget that Britain legally banned talking positively about homosexuality to children/teens until like 2008. No way those books would have been published if she included explicitly gay characters from the start. She did write Dumledore as gay well before book 7, but how she wrote his love story with Grindlewald was like the only way to do so in a YA series at the time.

Sirius/Remus rabid shippers make me lol nowadays though since it's clear they're not relationship material for each other, and Sirius' little stunt with Snape must have completely traumatized Remus.

No. 1915675

>>1915514
Dumbledore loving/being exes with the prior genocide wizard informs his character and his actions throughout the books though. The gay is also blatantly visible in book 7.

Dude thinks nothing of raising Harry as a lamb for the slaughter for the greater good, as he also had to put the good of the Wizarding world before his personal priorities.

No. 1915733

>>1915514
Sort of yes, Merope essentially wizard assaulted his father and it lead to him being born without the ability to love (it's a side effect of Armortentia or something).

No. 1915744

>>1915675
People can come up with the most convoluted explanations on why X character is gay-coded but act like it's completely incomprehensible for Dumbledore. Someone might've linked it in a previous thread but Dumbledore gay jokes existed even before JKR confirmed it (some rap battle video) because of his eccentric clothing, lack of female lovers and other stuff that even the dudebros picked it up. But I guess that's not gay-coding because they need to discredit JKR on everything.

No. 1915843

>>1915675
Honestly, I had forgotten about Grindelwald until someone mentioned him itt. I remember her saying he was gay between the books 6 and 7, but I might be wrong. I agree that book 7 showed more of Dumbledore, I guess my dumb young brain didn't pick on the nuance at the time.

No. 1915888

>>1915514
JK Rowling repeatedly made a huge point about how love potions are unethical, they’re banned at hogwarts and Ron experiences the effects of an expired one which made it basically fermented lol. Even the lightweight joke ones that Fred and George sell are banned at school and it’s considered weird to use them, and they were supposed to cause someone to have a small crush for a short time or something. So at the end of the series JK Rowling revealed that Voldemort’s mother used an actual love potion to essentially drug and rape a muggle through mind control, and anyone conceived with a love potion won’t be able to experience love or form bonds with others, so it creates psychopaths

No. 1916049

>>1913246
Does anyone have that reaction of twitter fans genuinely being genuinely shocked to learn that Bakugo was dead?

No. 1916292

>>1915843
I'm probably misremembering, but wasn't one of the reasons for the stated reveal being outside of the books because she made a screenplay correction for a line mentioning a past female love interest in one of the films? People act like she just tossed the info out in a tweet one day back when she was leaning into interacting with the fandom hard, but I swear it wasn't revealed like that kek

No. 1916301

>>1915547
In hindsight it was a blessing. Troons would have had a field-day with any tomboy type character.

No. 1916369

>>1915744
Nobody can read between the lines any more even when it's this obvious. Dumbledore could have been written as an effeminate man who lives with another effeminate man, is unmarried, dresses in rainbow flag robes, and has multiple statues of naked men in his office, and there would still be people complaining that JKR had retconned him as gay instead of providing the all-important representashun.
>>1915514
Merope was mentally ill and stuck with a seriously shitty family with no feasible way to escape from them, which explains why she'd do something retarded like use a love potion to trap her Prince Charming and guarantee her escape. She didn't know, or didn't care, about the consequences for her child. Even if she did, she probably wouldn't care that much, since she'd faked Tom's love for her with a potion and probably thought she could use another spell or potion to make her kid love her too. Or she just wouldn't notice he was a psychopath in the first place, since her brother and dad were so insane and violent that as long as little Tommy didn't beat her head in on the daily she'd think he loved her.
>>1915888
And you still get brainlets reeing that this is bad because muh IRL rape babies will develop a complex about being unable to love after reading Harry Potter. Because obviously if you're the product of rape, you have no issues in your life at all until ebil JKR tells you that you're bad. The reasoning behind why love potions make psychopaths makes total sense in-universe and also explains why there aren't thousands of other little Voldies running around.

No. 1917119

>>1914735
>>1914754
>>1914791
tbf Cho Chang is a nonsensical name, but all the characters have nonsensical names. No white people in real life are named Albus Albus Dumbledore or Slughorn. People forget that the Harry Potter series was originally meant for children, but it grew with the readers.

No. 1917134

>>1914699
>she also started writing the books around the time her mother died early so maternal characters figure a lot.

Disney also had movies with dead parents too and also due an accident, but it seems people forget that dead parents trope is an old ass trope.

No. 1917136

>>1917119
I could be reading to much into it, but I think part of why she had so many silly names was because fate and prophecy is a big element of the plot, so most of the characters had names that fit their life or personality. She should have done a bit of research into Chinese names though, even choosing a very common typical name would have been better lol

No. 1917145

>>1917119
I think the difference is just that Dumbledore and Slughorn are obvious fairytale names. Cho Chang isn't whimsical or silly, it just looks like a stereotypical Chinese name.

No. 1917171

>>1917145
it also nonsense. the closest it seemed like in Chinese is to 'chou' and the first words that come to mind when seeing that as pinyin would be 'smelly' or 'ugly'. I love the HP books and I love JKR but it really is kind of a poorly researched name.

No. 1917466

File: 1709986390091.png (257.91 KB, 657x548, JK_Hate.png)

>>1917171
I do have some issues about JK's writing. In my opinion the decision to shift the tone to appear more 'darker' had a negative impact on the series as it progressed. However, I don't consider a silly name when the series was still more kiddish to be a valid criticism.
And all that said, the vast majority of criticism she receives is from degenerates who make claims like picrel, that are so retarded that they can't even be bothered to pretend they don't hate her guts.

No. 1917472

>>1914910
>the way people go after female writers is unhinged. Male writers write literal rape, incest and worse and everyone praises them to high hell.
honestly this is all that needs to be said about this JKR conversation

No. 1917474

>>1917145
to a western person it IS a whimsical fairytale name the same way japanese people think bobson dugnutt is a good valid western name, it really ain't that deep

No. 1917477

>>1917466
>white as one of her "crimes"
>whitelady feels
Oh no, how dare she be born with a certain skin colour! And be a woman too! Horrible.

No. 1917478

>>1917474
Literally this, imagine if, say, americans went all up in arms over engrish in east asian media, everyone would eat them up for being stuck up english-centric retards kek

No. 1917519

>>1917478
english speakers are all up in arms about east asian engrish, in asian media and face-to-face to ESL speakers all the time. only instead of crying racism, they make fun of it or croon about their superior English skills for some reason (congrats? on being proficient in your native language??). different form of criticism but still critical. Look at how we even have a specific word for it, engrish.

No. 1917546

>>1917466
NGL something that pushed me into peaking more is how no one could criticize JKR for things she actually said. Even the self-proclaimed "critical thinkers" I knew who had great criticisms about HP's plot/writing, when it came to her politics all they could say is "she's just transphobic" and not explain what part of her tweets or essay were wrong. It's also crazy how these same people are calling her a right winger when before becoming gender critical, JKR had a reputation of being a stereotypical liberal hippie and self-described herself as a centrist.

No. 1917715

File: 1710005688094.png (1.44 MB, 1280x1280, BVhShAP.png)

>>1910177
"sapphic fantasies" like picrel tend to be the usual depictions of female/female by straight women.

No. 1917723

>>1917474
No it's not anon kek. Ayrt, I'm American and even as a kid I never thought it was whimsical or unique. Literally any western person would just think it's a typical Asian name.

No. 1917724

>>1917519
That's just people poking fun at broken words, it's not really "criticism" as much as it is just light banter. Chinese and japanese people also poke fun at westerners that get retarded tattoos with chinese/japanese characters that they think mean something mystical and profound but in reality mean nonsense.

No. 1917741

>>1917715
Yeah, and they're always from straight women who have a "grass is greener" view on female/female relationships. I've known one too many women who know men aren't worth it and try to "go gay" and pursue women anyway despite having zero sexual attraction, because they think dating women and having a girlfriend is like a 24/7 BFF.

No. 1917748

>>1917741
It reminds me of this account by some "lesbian radfem" in the 70's, who went to a women's commune and was disgusted seeing women actually having sex with each other, she called it "succumbing to baser instincts" she claimed being a lesbian meant serving women above all and having romantic connections with women that went beyond sex and that she was more of a lesbian despite not having sexual interest in women cause she had stronger connections with them.

No. 1917761

>>1917741
TIMs tend to have a similar mindset as to why they are focused on lesbianism, 1) is porn and fetishization and 2) is a fear of men, you can see it in the shit they write, where there is always a powerfantasy scenes of his their effortlessly beating and humiliating a group of straight men and stealing their girlfriends.

No. 1917782

File: 1710011623362.png (658.84 KB, 1080x1896, araki-was-so-real-for-this-v0-…)

While Araki can be a faggot sometimes, I feel like this was just a lighthearted joke/scene, but twitards gotta twitard.

No. 1917788

>>1917782
I need to mentally prepare myself because I can see one of my friends brining it up as a #transright thing while the rest of the group sits awkwardly in silence.

No. 1917798

>>1917782
it was definitely just araki going 'lol arent transexuals funny' he loves his gay jokes

No. 1917800

>>1917788
>one friend bringing it up as a #transright thing while the rest of the group sits awkwardly in silence
Hate how much I relate to this, got a recently-turned enby like that in my dnd group (speaking of, the fandom surrounding dnd/its related podcasts [who don't even play the game] are some of the most annoying people I've met online, christ)

No. 1917834

Monty Python is so moid coded and unfunny.(wrong thread)

No. 1917838

>>1917834
wrong thread?

No. 1917861

>>1917834
>coded
Stfu

No. 1918065

>>1917782
I legit thought the joke wasn't tranny but that it's a dude getting into a woman's prison for the rape

No. 1918106

>>1917782
>positive portrayal
>in prison and clearly addicted to steroids

No. 1918290

I'm curious, has a show's voice acting ever made me you wanna stop watching a series?
I watched Blue Eye Samurai sometime back and I have mixed views on it overall, but one thing that really stood out and confused me was the stark difference in the quality of voice acting. The show was packed with recognizable Asian stars (because you can't have Asian characters voiced by non-Asian people anymore). When I first watched it, I believed they had hired random dub actors because it was that mediocre. However, the stark difference between the voice acting is what fascinated me. Kenneth Branagh as Abijah Fowler and Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa as the sowrdmaster probably gave the best performances in the entire cast. Maya Erskine(The MC) and Darren Barnet(the love interest) were just fine, but Randall Park as the official(The other guy in vidrel) and Brenda Song as the princess were just so godawful. Their performance really took me out of the experience.

No. 1918691

>>1918065
Maybe you're into something and that's why Jolyene was freaked out at first, until the doctor gaslit her about it.

No. 1918957

File: 1710079628437.png (335.79 KB, 739x1102, 1000005416.png)

>>1918290
In Dungeon Meshi I really wanted to swap to the Japanese dub when I heard they gave the female dwarf to a troon and she sounds just like a dude, but I'm watching it with a group

No. 1918968

>>1918957
I watched one clip of this in English and it sounded like garbage.

No. 1918977

>>1918957
Does she sound like a guy in the original Japanese? Don't understand why they would otherwise unless it's for performative/inclusitivity reasons. On another note the Lovely Complex dub casted a bunch of trans people out of spite/as an own because the series is transphobic or some shit.

No. 1919002

>>1916369
>Nobody can read between the lines any more even when it's this obvious. Dumbledore could have been written as an effeminate man who lives with another effeminate man, is unmarried, dresses in rainbow flag robes, and has multiple statues of naked men in his office, and there would still be people complaining that JKR had retconned him as gay instead of providing the all-important representashun.
You know I think it's actually more of a cultural thing. Like it's audience expectations that vary.
Some examples I can think of are Asian romance manga/comics that have male lead who are downright abusive and nasty but the audience is split between
>omg he loves her so much! They have so much chemistry! He a red flag but I'm colorblind teehee
>he's nasty and loves controlling her and is obsessed with controlling her, that's not love
And the top is definitely what the author was going for. Or the book Lolita
>it's about an unreliable narrartor pedo grooming a child
>it's an age gap love story and the girl totally wanted it
And somehow TWO adaptations got made with that second interpritation in mind.

No. 1919100

>>1918290
I actually didn’t like the ginger villain’s voice acting, he sounded like he was switching accents very often and it was really jarring

No. 1919101

>>1918977
No, she doesn't. She sounds like a butch woman in japanese, masculine but still female. It's very sad because they made her get a "nonbinary voice" in English because "dungeon meshi is inclusive and queer coded" but instead they erased the butch bisexual woman that Namari is. She literally sounds like a dude in the dub. My bf said he didn't notice anything it makes me so mad tbh.

No. 1919107

>>1918957
I'm sorry what they did to you Namari. You deserved better. I love you

No. 1919125

>>1919101
Fuck, that's gross (manipulative).
Looking it up, it'd funny how the Japanese comments are "why is she a man" and "A man voice doesnt fit her character".

No. 1919200

File: 1710086661478.mp4 (3.12 MB, 960x540, 1705633690983.mp4)

>>1918290
>>1919101
Until a few years ago, I was exclusively watching dubs. But the awful quality of modern dubbing made me to switch over to watching the original Japanese. I find that most female VA's sound devoid of emotion and artificial, while most male VA's come across as whiny fags. It almost feels like their trying to make the dubbing sound unbearable as hell.

No. 1919219

>>1919200
Oh god this sounds like a meme sound on tiktok

No. 1919265

>>1919200
English VA’s have really gone to shit over the last few years. I also used to only listen to dub but switched to the original audio and I can’t go back.
I almost couldn’t finished the Blue Eyed Samurai because of how awful the voice acting was. I know it wasn’t originally Japanese but it just shows how low the bar for English VA’s has gotten.

No. 1919271

>>1919200
This sounds like those youtube parody dubs from back in the day. Is the script accurate to the Japanese script?

No. 1919274

>>1919271
Here's the japanese version.

No. 1919289

File: 1710092240738.mp4 (2.73 MB, 1280x720, TN3PuNkaPd_Mmox_.mp4)

>>1919265
I posted this in one of the previous threads, just a decade ago most voice actors were former local actors who were hired by studios, they would also be doing voice work for Western cartoons as well and this could lead to radically different dub qualities. but when crunchyroll took over the industry, a gap started to emerge where cheaper internet-based non-union LA dubbers suddenly took over the scene and the quality of voice actors has never really been recovered.

No. 1919302

>>1918957
Why do you even watch it with the English dub, you're basically asking to be assaulted with bad taste lmao.

No. 1919319

>>1919274
This was actually funny and less awkward sounding.

No. 1919323

>>1919289
It's literally over for dubfags. The whole scene is constantly deterioating and riddled with YouTube voice actors now because all you need is connections to get in. Not to mention how some scriptwriters just use dubs as a vehicle for their politics. If you care about anime you might as well abandon ship

No. 1919339

File: 1710094538521.gif (5.91 MB, 480x360, 2NnkknM.gif)

>>1919323
It really is, because either it manages to linger on and die slowly or it faces a huge financial loss, crashes and burns with mass layoffs.

No. 1919344

>>1919302
Dubtards are literally unsalvageable. You cannot speak any logic or sense into them.

No. 1919353

>>1919200
Thankfully, my country still has veteran TV actors voicing most dubs.

No. 1919434

>>1919200
The worst is seeing people shill these shitty dubs as being great when the only value they have was already there from the original, even the sound quality in this thing is off.

No. 1919451

>>1919434
That's the thing, a few thousand overly gender specials liking a dub doesn't translate to actual watchers.

No. 1919491

>>1919200
This literally sounds like something out of an abridged series, wtf

No. 1919590

>>1919274
if i'm being honest, this sounds exactly like the english version. its just cause its japanese so it doesn't sound as bad cause we can't actually understand what he is saying, but did this anime just have the shittiest budget in the world?

No. 1919630

>>1919590
They sound pretty different to me tbh. Disregarding language, I cant understand how anybody could confuse the two.

No. 1919643

File: 1710108622214.mp4 (272.36 KB, 1280x720, Dc172AuuJSebl_hm.mp4)

>>1919491
An abridged series would be funnier though.

No. 1919706

>>1919630
its a really unfunny joke with the guy doing the same muffled laugh, its bad in both languages.

No. 1919742

>>1919706
I thought the point of that particular joke was that the VA in the Japanese dub just was laughing for real, so they kept it like that.

No. 1919774

>>1919200
This unlocked a memory of watching Conan O’Brien doing an improv dubbing of the Ghost in the Shell and he was actually better than this.
This is so bad is actually funny.

>>1919742
Yea I had heard that too which is why the laugh sounds a little uncanny for an anime

No. 1920223

>>1918957
THIS is how the character looks like in canon???? all the fanart made me think shes some kind of hairy roided beast wtf

No. 1920508

>>1919274
like day and night!
anya from spy x family is another example for this.

No. 1920561

File: 1710168886475.jpg (218.21 KB, 1080x535, 1000016490.jpg)

I don't watch any streamers but this randomly popped up on my tl and it's a bit jarring how streamer fandoms expect their streamers to bend over backwards for their comforts.

No. 1920575

>>1920561
I'm not an expert, but if their family tradition doesn't allow music, then shouldn't they not be allowed to watch a streamer either? I've only done a basic web search but it looks like music is a contested thing, so I can't imagine being strict on music but not on watching things.

No. 1920578

>>1920561
I feel like there’s a 99% chance this user is a minor whose parents would lose their shit if they heard music playing during Ramadan, and the user is asking politely and doesn’t seem to even necessarily expect a response.

No. 1920580

>>1920575
no it's a thing when you have an Islamic fast, your not allowed to listen to music, have sex, do certain types of labour e.t.c

No. 1920650

>>1920561
This reminds me of when Tumblr screamed at people to tag posts "nsfr" but didn't do it for any other (non-Christian) religious holiday. I never gave into it because I didn't follow muslims or have any follow me, but it was so performative.

No. 1920713

>>1920223
She's just a normal lady, before the anime I wouldn't have expected it at all.

No. 1920815

>>1920650
I remember this. People who acted like it was a mandatory thing to do otherwise you're islamophobic were so retarded. Not even 2 years later I see Muslims saying not to tag nsfr/warn for food because Ramadan is supposed to test their self-restraint and that it infantilizes Muslims and treats them like animals who can't control themselves after seeing a single image of food or whatever. It's never worth listening to the new SJW rule of the week because people are gonna come up with why the reverse is ackshully politically correct days later

No. 1920848

>>1920561
this is so retarded.

No. 1920857

>>1920561
I hate muslims so much, why does anyone have to work extra hard so they can pretend they have an eating disorder for a whole month?

>>1920578
Minors shouldn't be online anyway so whatever.

No. 1920859

>>1920857
Muslims are the most retarded of the religious idiots, but for some reason you have to bend down for them. Ramadan makes zero sense to any normal human being. They should work on their lack of human rights instead

No. 1920862

>>1920561
I dont know much about ramadan, but it sounds like people should care a lot less about catering to these kind of people.

No. 1920866

>>1920862
You're right, it's just yet another harmful religious practice at this point, like if they want to meditate and shit they can just use something called willpower and not turn on their devices, not eat, not drink water and whatever else they do.
Like why is everyone supposed to just stop living? Even those who don't even follow any particular religion? Just for the sake of some people with an immolation fetish? I don't get it.
They could just use their book written by their pedophile prophet and use it to spend their misery period of time on their own instead of expecting everyone else to just cater to them all.
This shit doesn't happen for catholics, for example, during the holy week they're not allowed to eat other than fish, but you don't see whole countries or restaurants closing or putting black curtains everywhere so no one is tempted by the meat and chicken.

No. 1920871

>>1920815
>Ramadan is supposed to test their self-restraint and that it infantilizes Muslims and treats them like animals who can't control themselves after seeing a single image of food or whatever
Because they actually can't but don't want to admit to it. I live in islam capital, and they break into fights in the middle of the streets and cause car accidents on purpose out of anger and frustration that they have to stay hungry, and fight over food in restaurants before maghrib. Violence and street fights increase during this cursed month, and domestic violence as well. They use "I'm fasting" as an excuse as well.

No. 1920875

>>1920871
>>1920815
what's weird is most people in Muslim countries just bare it, it's though but not impossible to deal with, it's the thirst that's most rough but these people are rich kids who aren't working outside and it's not that hard to not be in online spaces that will have nsfw mateiral or music.

No. 1920892

>>1920650
what a throwback, I remember the posts saying you have to do this despite most users having 0 Muslim followers. it was like people tagging every picture of an eye as scopophobia

No. 1920911

>>1920650
I seriously hate how Tumblr's approach to tagging leaked onto Twitter and other sites. Tagging should just be seen as a courtesy thing but some people will jump you if you don't tag, it's retarded. I understand wanting suicide/rape to be tagged but when I was on Tumblr in 2017 people would expect their mutuals to tag the most minuscule shit like playgrounds because it "triggered" them (probably munchies priming themselves to be triggered).

No. 1920940

File: 1710193368489.jpg (87.19 KB, 750x1000, raf,750x1000,075,t,fafafa_ca44…)

Here's a thing that has to be understood, the narrative of "authentic Muslims" comes almost exclusively from Muslims in America. There is a huge difference between Muslims in America and the rest of the world, simply because of the requirements to get in.
Like my cousin(who is a business graduate with no criminal history) only got a VISA after waiting years, compare to that my Uncle who was a violent Islamist who makes his infant daughter wear veils, he's been living in the UK for 20 years now, in fact my grandfather sent him there cause he was being too much of an Islamist in our country, but that's the same with all other ethnicities and religious groups, the Americanized narrative always dominates.

No. 1920959

>>1920859
>>1920857
islam is an archaic religion that refuses to evolve and adapt to modern times, but you can't say anything. i hate how it's never held to the same standards as catholicism and judaism, while not perfect at least they have become more flexible with the passage of time? idc if it's a mostly pee oh cee religion, islam is harmful to many of its followers.

No. 1920973

>>1920871
kek you just reminded me of when I had the misfortune of having to visit my relatives in their muslim country for a whole month in the middle of summer because I wasn't 18yo just yet so I had no say in that and even thought I ate the whole time and nobody gave a fuck it was supposed to be calm outside, yet every single morning you'd have people getting into fist fights right below our windows because they were stressed and hungry and forced to fast or they'd get in trouble with their friends or family or maybe they could get fined, idk. I was stuck there with no internet connection, I thought I was going to kms because I had to go to an internet cafe to not miss the new Free! episodes while the first season was getting released and as soon as ramadan was over everyone went back to chain smoking and giving themselves diabetes in there.

>>1920892
I remember seeing posts about tagging everything as nsfr but I don't remember anyone I followed doing this. At the very best they would tag anything as #food even if a post just vaguely referenced eating lunch but that was way more widespread because of anachans asking people to do this on tumblr more or less at the same time.

No. 1920980

>>1920959
Islam has yet to be reformed like Judaism and Christianity. I would say that Catholicism has only opened up and made progressive strides since Vatican II, and even that's a few centuries post reformation. I believe that Islam cannot be reformed as it is now because too many governments across the MENA countries use Islam as a backing for their style of governance, and treat it like a legitimizing factor. I think a lot of non-muslim westerners are caught in this loop of witnessing the harm Islam brings in countries where it is most firmly established (particularly wahhabism) while also lacking the proper understanding and vocabulary needed to dissect its moral depravity. They feel uncomfortable in their ignorance and they don't want to be objective in their reasoning, so they believe the propaganda they're fed by certain fanatics. I don't associate with muslims anymore for the same reasons I don't associate with die-hard Christians, they make everything about heaven or hell and they judge the shit out of you for anything while always projecting this air of intense pride. It's frustrating.(derailing)

No. 1921580

File: 1710233514266.jpg (35.51 KB, 372x422, 1663157843245.jpg)


No. 1921800

File: 1710251898595.jpg (325.31 KB, 2048x1229, 1000038182.jpg)

I hate coomerfags. It took scrotes less than a year to strip the word tomboy of all of its meaning and turn it into Discord grooming meme.

No. 1921804

File: 1710252021948.jpg (393.78 KB, 2048x1228, 1000038183.jpg)


No. 1921851

File: 1710254073814.jpg (424.35 KB, 1080x2081, 1000014487.jpg)

I really hate the fandommization of religions and religion headcanons.

No. 1921855

>>1921851
I know it's just shitposting but same, nobody wants to remember these ugly scrote religions while we're trying to oogle our husbando.

No. 1921856

>>1921851
only if they're muslim, i haven't see any christian headcanons

No. 1921857

NOTICE

Thread has reached 1100 posts. The thread will be locked and you will be unable to post in it shortly after it exceeds 1200 posts. Please begin preparing a new thread and post a link to it when it's created.

No. 1921858

NOTICE

Thread has reached 1100 posts. The thread will be locked and you will be unable to post in it shortly after it exceeds 1200 posts. Please begin preparing a new thread and post a link to it when it's created.

No. 1921866

>>1921856
I only see characters headcanoned as Christians either as jokes or by other Christians in fandom. Meanwhile mainly Muslim or Jewish headcanons are from people outside of those cultures (I consider ex-Christian liberals that are "converting to Judaism" as outsiders).

No. 1921869

File: 1710255359622.png (543.75 KB, 787x758, sphere.png)

>>1921800
>>1921804
It reminds me of this though a lot of these "phenotypes" is very much aimed to trooned AGPs.
>"Very girly, womanly vibes

No. 1921873

>>1921869
Do you have more posts like that?

No. 1921874

>>1921873
you can find them on the GC Screencaps thread" on /2X/

No. 1921880

>>1921869
the sphere hunter was a tranny porn actor kek i am pretty sure he's a fag and getting pussy wouldnt have saved him from trooning out

No. 1921907

>>1921880
True, they probably would gag at a real one since they don't look like shaved animu children ones. The Lain ideal is pretty interesting to think about though regarding these breed of scrotes

No. 1921908

>>1921880
He did porn cause he's an AGP, it's part of his fetish and view of women.

No. 1921909

>>1921907
its just another gay moid cope. I wish they would just butt fuck eachother and stop bothering women.

No. 1921911

>>1921908
i am pretty sure he did gay porn with other trannies, he is at the very least bisexual.

No. 1921915

>>1921800
It's harmless compared to other porn memes, but the way how the 'tomboys' are portrayed feels uncanny. These artists copy what they see in porn and anime, and end up with these caricatures.

No. 1921917

>>1921915
The "femcel tomling" is literally an incel chud but drawn as a kawaii desu anime girl. Kek moids fall for psyops so easily

No. 1921918

>>1921800
>>1921804
Not a single one of these exists outside of their deranged fantasies, how are men so retarded?

No. 1921930

>>1921869
Trannies trying to appropriate autistic shutin girl culture makes me sad. Cant have shit for ourselves

No. 1921939

>>1921869
Oh that is a depressingly tasteless room.

No. 1921941

File: 1710260026296.png (166.2 KB, 400x400, Pipkin_Pippa_-_Portrait.png)

>>1921917
that ones based on a vtuber named pippa who a giant pickme pandering to 4chan scrotes

No. 1921945

>>1921930
True but they think the le loser neet autism girls are all like Tomoko or whatever MS paint slop describes them as. They won't ever find a real woman like that since we're sentient and have actual interests and personalities nor do they deserve any woman in that matter

No. 1921964

>>1921800
>>1921804
I hate men so much it's unreal. Just seeing this makes me want to eradicate the Y chromosome altogether.

No. 1921977

>>1921941
God I hate vtubers
What do you think changed in fandom culture with their popularity? Iirc they appeared en masse in the beginning of the pandemic, right?

No. 1921990

>>1921800
>>1921804
Most of those are not even 'boyish', what a shitty coomer meme.

No. 1921993

>>1921800
The thing is that if any of these men would interact with an actually mentally ill woman that is unhinged. They would reject her. If they had to interact with someone unwashed, actually unhinged with low self esteem they would reject that girl
They have this fantasy like delusional image of what a mentally ill woman looks and behaves like

No. 1922015

>>1921993
They're completely anime poisoned and only interested in a sexualized idea of a mentally ill depressed shut-in for the coom. If they were in a relationship with one you can bet they wouldn't give her any of the demanding emotional support she needs and would be disgusted by her. They'd ignore her mental health needs unless it involves being hypersexual for them and by consequence by dragged into an extremely unhealthy relationship with no mutual support. Can't forget that moids disproportionately leave their female partners when these get sick or disabled. I hate these moids so much and I hope every single one of them trannies out and cuts off his dick and balls.

No. 1922025

>>1921941
how is this even considered close to a tomboy lmfao.

No. 1922028

>>1921990
They treat "tomboy" literally as a rebranded term for "manic pixie dream girl" but with dommy mommy undertones. It's all because of that fucking Nagatoro anime I swear.

No. 1922036

>>1922015
If they encountered an actual femcel that is dirty, unwashed, unhinged, actually shut in, severely depressed. They wouldn't even have sex with her or initiate any sort of relationship.

No. 1922040

>>1922015
>>1922036
Note how their idea of a "femcel" is also always skinny but slightly curvy, never fat/chubby or emancipated like a lot of shut ins are.

No. 1922046

>>1921941
>tfw my favorite pokemon character will forever be associated with this chick
feels bad

No. 1922049

File: 1710265032508.jpg (50.43 KB, 500x500, totes a tomboy teehee.jpg)

>>1921800
>>1921804
Except for the first one, all of these are pic rel.

No. 1922082

File: 1710266772309.jpg (402.06 KB, 1080x2074, 1000014551.jpg)

This is all so awkward. Idk, maybe it's because I was always told that only Muslims can talk about being Muslim and that even referencing their religion was rude, but looking at anime characters praying like Muslims and making characters wearing hijabs and so on is so weird to me, that I feel like I'm just experiencing a fever dream lmao.

No. 1922087

>>1921800
>>1921804
ugh these have so much gross coomer energy. it doesn't matter if you're mentally ill, unwashed, misandrist, GNC- moids will still fetishize you, sort you into a convenient porn category instead of seeing you as human. I will say the original posts on twitter got a lot of flak from normie women which was refreshing to see. Seems like trannybait tbh kek they love to skinwalk mentally ill female characters like lain and tomoko

No. 1922091

File: 1710267161609.jpeg (162.63 KB, 950x700, IMG_5946.jpeg)

>>1922082
Same energy

No. 1922096

>>1921990
Literally just normal women but because they don't act extremely feminine they are tomboys, smh

No. 1922108

>>1921800
>>1921804
Tomboy is any woman that isn't a caricature of a 50's housewives. Like domestricated tomboy could literally be any woman if she ever sits "like a dude", whatever that means. I was actually sent this shit to "tag myself" and didn't know this retarded shit came from Twitter

No. 1922135

>>1922082
It's especially stupid that they do this with characters from a series that's based on Japanese superstitions and Buddhism. Algerians saying that Vegeta is Kabyle makes much more sense at that point kek

No. 1922140

>>1921800
interesting none of them display actual masculine features but rather coomfied tomboys but theyre all defined by porn tags also kek at pippa griftkin being included. the nsfw twitard community is such a cancer

No. 1922141

>>1921804
>>1921800
eww it has the same art style as that hell harem game where the girls all look like each other

No. 1922342

>>1920561
As a life long Muslim, this is just entitled behavior. You can’t ask or demand someone to bend over like this for your lack of religiousness. A person like this is better off going offline

No. 1922442

>>1921869
>"this (women) only exists in the minds of men"
>women’s ideal men only exist in men written by women
The tragedy of humans distilled kek

No. 1922501

>>1922082
>>1922091

Lmao, never forget the image makers sit the lowest depths of Islamic hell

No. 1922703

File: 1710296744476.png (152.58 KB, 595x798, Capture2.PNG)

I'm glad someone said it but of course people are angry

No. 1922735

>>1921941
Not even 4chan, kiwiscrotes

No. 1922741

>>1922442
it's sad, the ideal waifu for moids is some 50s underage housewife while all women want is some guy whos nice and doesnt watch porn

No. 1922760

>>1922703
>@MenEnjoyers
we can tell

No. 1922777

>>1922703
Why even look at tranny porn to begin with

No. 1922780

>>1922703
Aren't most troon headcanons done by troons themselves? I'm confused.

No. 1922786

>>1922703
>let people enjoy surgery scars
What….they're treating it like some kind of fashion trend.
>>1922780
It's troon on troon violence

No. 1922796

>>1922703
It's so obvious to anyone even remotely plugged into this side of fandom that people just want to recreate heterosexual sex with special words. It's never two TIFs having sex, it's never the TIF topping a man, they always make it a man fucking a woman with masectomy scars and no one is allowed to call a spade a spade. I'm surprised there are any TIFs mentioning it at all. Maybe if they make it problematic faster this godforsaken trend will finally die.

No. 1922816

this was discussed earlier itt but reminder to whoever creates the next thread to remove “twitter/tumblr” from the title so this thread stops attracting baiting newfags, please

No. 1922833

File: 1710305840347.png (142.83 KB, 598x706, right.png)

>>1922703
>trans men do it "too much" is a problem

TIFs want to make gay men to have sex with a vagina to hide their homophobia, girl. That's why they never admit their boyfriend is straight or bi. That's the problem, not that they "bottom".

Picrel, what's the empty threats in Hell?

No. 1922847

File: 1710307296990.jpeg (Spoiler Image,484.38 KB, 1170x2621, IMG_3985.jpeg)

>>1922833
>male character drawn with exaggeratedly handsome, sexy features
>”oMg HoW dArE yOu sExUaLiZe this made up, fictional character!!! It is asexual erasure and literal abuse to think about this drawing in a sexual context!!”
Twitterfags are like this about Alastor from Hazbin hotel too, a character that is a literal demon who kills and eats people kek.

No. 1922848

>>1922833
it amazes me when women pickmemaxx even in fandom, like holy shit we finally have a moid free space and you still use it to babysit moidlings? fuck off i am not going to sexualize astarion because he's ugly, not because it hurts your feefees

No. 1922851

>>1922847
his vision is completly fucked

No. 1922866

>>1922847
not that related and it's stupid but i'd rather have men like this one pretend they're so persecuted for being asexual than see them paint their nails and thinking that makes them a marginalized gendie, or even worse, full-blown mtfs

>>1922851
wow i thought i'd never see someone with lenses thicker than mine

No. 1922871

>>1922866
He's still an entitled scrote angry that women dare to sexualize the tumblr sexyman. He also most than likely mastubates to loli or hentai or some fucked up shit, no man is ''asexual''

No. 1922876

>>1922833
Why do these retards act like fictional characters are real people

No. 1922877

>>1922871
definitely, but i can't lie i'm relieved this one isn't some shape of "alice she/her anarchist catgirl uwu". probably just a dumb autist that seems too old to be into sparkledog hotel.

No. 1922884

>>1922851
I truly believe that some of these people are “asexual” because they’re such genetic dead ends that nature simply prevents them from reproducing, which is for the best

No. 1922886

>>1922884
I knew a guy who thought he was asexual, because he was molested as a kid and had a fear of sexual desire, he stopped identifying one after he grew up and found a girlfriend(who was also a former asexual), so I think people who were traumatized by either porn or sexual abuse also make up a significat portion of asexuals.

No. 1922905

>>1922876
Fictional characters become part of their identity so they get butthurt when anything they don't approve of happens to that character.

No. 1922942

>>1922796
>It's so obvious to anyone even remotely plugged into this side of fandom that people just want to recreate heterosexual sex with special words
cryptos need to start shilling t4t so i don't have to see anymore spicy straight porn in the tags of my yaoi and yuri ships

No. 1922944

>>1922847
I love how Vivzie said she doesn't care but they will not stop sperging. I expect this level of autistic moralfaggotry from TIFs but whenever men do it I have to wonder what's wrong with them. Well, aside from being men.

No. 1923007

>>1909110
he's literally tumblr sexyman bait. pathetic but strong, blonde, wears suit, unique voice, plays an instrument. everything i look for in a man. i did think he was kinda endearing but surprising i ended up hating him because he ruins the plot with his mere existence. fucking deus ex machina ass appearing out of nowhere to save the day when no one expects you in the final battle. human stolas personification of daddy issues twink looking ass you just HAD to be endearing, you had to be. i hate him. don't let his sexiness fool you. that bitch is EVIL i tell you, you've seen what he did with the apple. and he's a coward. "look at me, wah wah i left my daughter for 7 years because i have depression but she called me on the telephone one time and i immediately showed up and changed my mind about her plan". boo hoo, what a crybaby. he believed in free will for humans because he saw how adam and lilith were being treated unequally and that lilith desired independence, and he wanted to grant free will so everyone would be equal. cool, you fucking succeeded with the free will now goddamn try to bring equality. accept damn reality and rule your kingdom. you're so strong you could easily teach them to behave you lil ass. bruh his wife divorced him and now she's on a vacay to the beaches up the clouds. goodness what a failure you have to be for your damn wife who you were with for so many years to go get the milk. his cutie patootie lil ass dried my pussy faster than a fucking droplet thrown into the sun. adam ftw.

No. 1923015

>>1923007
beautiful nonna.

No. 1923018

>>1923007
adam has a gross goatee, while the blonde sexy demon has no nose, which makes him perfect for clit sucking.

No. 1923021

>>1923007
>deus ex machina ass appearing out of nowhere to save the day when no one expects you in the final battle
ackshually, he's an example of a Chekhov's Gun and his inclusion in the final episode was incredibly obvious. Whether a good example of that writing device or not, I don't care, I'm just tired of seeing events in stories that have a clear set up and pay off get called deus ex machinas kek

No. 1923031

>>1909164
why the fuck does it matter if youre a sapphic, cavafic, elytic, seferic or whatever greek word was turned into an adjective now? if they're looking for a sematic change then sure they can do that but they're going the wrong way about it, they're trying to change the meaning of the word without changing the perception people have of the concept they're attributing the word to. they can say faggot all they want until it becomes normal but the implications of faggot will be replaced with another word if that happens unless there's more practical work done. but you know that's the issue with keyboard warriors, they're good at keyboards but bad at practicality. they have a dream but they don't know how to implement it because they're the brains without the body to do the work for them. theyre still using the bad implications of it except now theyre the only ones who can say it. and that makes it even more forbidden. do they think that oppression stacks up and the more oppressed you are the more you can get away with so it will even out? or do they just do not think hard about their goals?

No. 1923033

>>1923021
well i don't really know much about literacy devices except the ones i encounter myself the most often so thanks for correcting me

No. 1923041

it's kinda funny to me that you guys are like, unironically into hazbin hotel kek gives me nausea just looking at those tumblrmaxxed designs but hey you do you

No. 1923059

>>1922942
>No you see it's queer porn because both the guy and the girl are nonbinary, yes yes. No icky straights here. Yes it's t4t. They just haven't transitioned yet, don't be a bigot.
>And that picture is also two nonbinary lesbians with vaginas fucking. t4t also!
>TERF? Now why would you think that? Would a TERF make nonbinary ocs who have lots of nasty queer sex?
>I'm totally not purposely poisoning the well and making up my own rules with your own retarded identity politics just like you do.

No. 1923089

>>1923041
some of us are and some of us aren't, I've actually been a long time vivze hater but I was pleasantly surprised about how decent HH was, it had its issues but miles better then her other work.

No. 1923117

>>1917782
Their ignorance of history is so annoying. From the 1960s to the late 1980s, East Germany and the United States exchanged prisoners. And what else happened during that period? The Olympic Games! East Germany was a very poor communist country. They wanted to distract the public from that fact and make themselves look better than West Germany, so they tried to do that by winning the Olympic sports. At the 1976 Olympic Games in Montreal, East Germany won 40 gold medals. The women’s swim team won 11 of the 13 swimming events! But it would not have happened without the help of steroids. Doctors lied to the athletes about the pills they were taking. The truth discovered after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Testosterone Injections and pills were given without their consent. Anyone who dared ask questions was kicked off the team. It’s very likely that the woman in the picture here was an athlete who was also sent to a US women’s prison after prison exchange. When I see what happens right now during the women's sports I am reminded of this event. I can't believe they refuse to look at history and twist it to fit their own views. Sure, it could be a simple mistake or ignorance but a little bit of misinformation can change a lot of stuff, like what they say about Stonewall and Elagabalus.

No. 1923124

>>1923041
Honestly found it pretty refreshing that anons here aren't all haters for the sake of it. The art style is a litmus test, if you can bare with it, then you'll be "rewarded" with a flawed but pretty enjoyable show with nice singing, and even better dub in Italian for example.

No. 1923167

>>1922703
Fujos usually like to make the male characters they like bottom. In fandoms, male characters who are usually liked the most by women are the ones who are usually trooned out. This kind of explains why male characters who are trooned out usually bottom most of the time.

No. 1923180

>>1923167
there isnt such a thing as 'topping' as a woman KEEEEK(stop)

No. 1923201

>>1923059
With how retarded queer labels are, you could claim all of your gay ships are pre-transition nonbinaries who strictly go by she/her (or he/him if male) and all of it should be valid under their beliefs since you don't need to transition to be trans and nonbinary people don't owe you androgyny. If they think it's spicy TERF porn just accuse them of being transphobes who want to genocide T4T couples.

No. 1923224

>>1923201
this is what ive been doing. i pretend im a black trans woman and nobody dares complain about what i do.

No. 1923236

File: 1710338575545.png (277.56 KB, 636x382, DMyZpS4.png)


No. 1923239

>>1923180
You need to learn more sex positions

No. 1923253

>>1923239
It's a gay thing, anon. Bottoming for gay moids just means who gets fucked in the arse. It doesn't apply to straight sex because, regardless of if a woman has sex in missionary or cowgirl possition, she's still the one ''receiving''.

No. 1923263

>>1923253
that's why gay moid vocabulary from stan twitter has been a net negative for womankind.

No. 1923267

>>1923263
Those anons have to be underage. It's always been a strictly gay male thing and it's wild to see it being used to describe sex positions in straight sex. It also makes no sense because in gay male sex bottom/top has nothing to do with dominant/submissive roles, it strictly refeers to who gets to dick and who gets dicked.

No. 1923278

>>1923267
Agreed. But I have also seen adult women who grew up in fandom spaces online using these terms in the most nonsensical ways
>be me, about to have lesbian sex
>woman I’m hooking up with says something like “sorry I’m such a bottom, teehee”
>me: ”no worries, so should I pull out my strap?”
>her: ”wait… what? can’t we just finger each other?”
It seems like when women call themselves “bottoms,” they just mean they want you to take the lead in the bedroom or something like that, it has nothing to do with sex positions kek

No. 1923280

>>1923278
Mental illness. I wish people would stop seeing sex as a submissive/dominant relationship.

No. 1923281

>>1923278
yeah i think a lot of people just think "top" means taking the dominant role. it's especially prevalent in fandom where yiu'll see shit like "topping from the bottom" etc which makes no sense if you're just talking about who gets dicked
but i can see where sexually inexperienced people could get confused

No. 1923288

>>1923267
Kek I'm not underage, just clueless about gay culture. I didn't look up the origins my bad.

No. 1923291

>>1923280
Hard to do when moids are obsessed with domination and groom women into being accepting of their retarded views on sex.

No. 1923295

>>1922942
The issue is that even t4t gets tagged incorrectly and you'll end up with gay sex in f/f tags and lesbian sex in m/m tags. God I hate gendies.

No. 1923417

>>1923414
i like the twink term i love degrading scrotes and its miles better than the ''femboy'' scroteshit

No. 1923418

>>1923263
The worst is probably the use of the word twink (originally a pedophilic term) being used for any male who isn't a steroid freak or fat goblin. Hell, I have seen it used for women as well, I'll se a post about how an actress whose just a natural woman is a "girl twink"

No. 1923437

>>1921800
true tomboy, tomelder and feral tomcreature are the only character tropes here that seem to be based on legitimate tomboys, although obviously still very coomerish in this version. everything else is just "woman with quirky interests" or "woman who isn't extremely girly"

No. 1923476

>>1923041
Agreed. It's stuff that would've been posted to the old hideous art threads. And despite its mature content, it feels very kid-ish to me. Maybe it's because of her YouTube furry animation origins that it just naturally doesn't feel (for lack of a better word)sophisticated. But also some people here are the type to support things just to be a contrarian, so take some people who like it with a grain of salt.

No. 1923513

>>1922082
this is obviously drawn as a joke. they're monstrous villains of the series so it's funny they're praying. nonnies taking it seriously are autistic kek

No. 1923518

>>1923418
DA but I remember learning from a girl's blog that her gay friend explained that twink is a porn term that comes from twinkie because it's "a young skinny blond thing full of white stuff." Never bothered to confirm with anyone because I am not american. Where did you learn it was pedophilic?

No. 1923534

>>1923518
You're replying to our famous Pakistani friend, anon.

No. 1923577

File: 1710362814767.png (24.24 KB, 128x128, not like this.png)


No. 1923595

>>1923059
You know if an artist does that she'd get posted here and torn apart for being a dumb gendie

No. 1923598

>>1922833
I do agree with this sentiment and I'm glad it's getting momentum, it feels like it already happened with female characters (especially black female characters) in female fandom spaces but then again no one ever goes into that side of fandom expected actual discussion about characters, stories, etc.

No. 1923600

>>1922780
yeah but this is one of those instances where they pretend everyone else does it and it's violence against tifs

No. 1923601

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 1923602

>>1923513
wouldn't that make it extra disrespectful though, if it was drawn by a Muslim?

No. 1923606

>>1922780
there are surprisingly a lot of "x transgirl' hc's by non gendies in pro-ship spaces.

No. 1923608

>>1923602
it's a joke. I promise you Muslims are laughing at how absurd it is.
Maybe one or two British Muslims are butthurt

No. 1923649

New thread:
>>1923647
>>1923647



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]