/ot/ - off-topic

100% of them would fuck teenagers. Maybe about 60% are traditional pedophiles who would go 12 or under if it were legal

Maybe move this to /2x/ instead? Seems more suitable for that

>>1721411
Agreed.

>>1721411
yeah, 100% men are attracted to post-pubescents or adolescents. but I think the actual number of legitimate pedophiles is much lower, i would say 40%

>>1721408
I think 99% of them, excluding the ones who have "milf" fetishes or are asexual due to mental illness.

>>1721470
I feel like it would be 15/16 and younger? I feel like most people look the same way they did as an older teenager as they do in their 20s-30s unless you go through a major life change like having a baby or drug addiction. Low quality moids date teens because most teenagers are too stupid to see red flags and so overly filled with emotions and obsession over social status they literally think if they don't have have a boyfriend their life is over which is why they're willing to stay in relationships when the moid is toxic and dangerous

>>1721501
Not even that. The moid who groomed me and said he wanted to fuck me when I showed him a picture of me at 12 goes on Twitter saying he likes older women. No one is safe

Why would I want to think about this shit, this is so 2x. I come here for escapism not to discuss how many men think about having sex with children.

Men’s sexual strategy has always been grab whatever is available. So the answer is whichever percentage think they can get away with it. That’s it.

>>1721531
>feel like most people look the same way they did as an older teenager as they do in their 20s-30s
Most people look better. Acne clears up, your weight distributes in a more flattering way, you learn how to dress and style yourself better, etc. Where do people even think "glow ups" come from?

My friend's a social worker and told me our hometown has the highest incidence of known pedophiles. They're addresses are known to authorities and loads of them live near schools. My town is a big satellite town with a large transport hub. When I was a schoolgirl I had to get the bus to town to switch to a local service and wore a uniform. Due to the interactions with men on public buses I never work socks with my skirts always tights because men would leer and bend down to look up before handheld cameras were common. I use to use my block file as a shield when sitting on the bus because I had separate incidents of men, some middle age some pensioners intentionally sitting next to me when there were free seats and trying to touch my thighs. Sitting upfront near the driver did not deter this. Older women would catch on sometimes and let you sit with them but it is insane how often I was harassed in town. I use to think it was weird you never see kids in the town but if I had a young daughter I'd be bedu reluctant for her to take public transport if I could give her a lift.

>>1721539
This.

i think i saw a paper the stats are like 5%. not sure how much i believe it, i never read the paper.

>>1721539
>>1721470
I think these two are correct, and when it comes to children it might depend on age. More men would go after a 10 year old than an infant, for example. Unfortunately, I think the majority of men would go after a child if they think they could get away with it.

It depends on what you consider pedophile, if you mean how many men are legitimately attracted to kids/teens when they're past those stages, I'd say it's rare (although I do think it's possible to become a pedo due to porn and society's obsession with youth influencing it). But if you define it as acting on it, I'd say it's more common. Sexual abuse is more often about having power over someone than attraction (unless a criminal has a repeated pattern of certain kind of victims, then I'd say they are attracted). The only reason men prefer younger women and girls is because they're easier to take advantage of.

Moved to >>>/2X/20280.