[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password (For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1694984972735.jpg (363.95 KB, 1000x850, Frank_W_Benson_03.jpg)

No. 1700560

Previous: >>>/ot/1668197
Discuss art and related topics such as:

-Talk about Art Youtubers
-Ask about art supplies
-Discuss trashy art trends
-Instagram bullshit
-Art theft!
-General Art Bullshit
-Fandom and Shipping Discourse
-AI generated art

SCREENCAP EVERYTHING!
WRITE SAGE IN THE E-MAIL FIELD OF YOUR COMMENTS!

Articles about useful resources for improving one's art:
https://hubpages.com/art/how-to-draw-learn
https://sites.google.com/site/ourwici/https://www.alexhays.com/loomis/
Tried and true books on perspective, anatomy for artists, etc:
1. Perspective Made Easy by Ernest R. Norling
2. How to Draw by Scott Robertson
3. Framed Ink by Marcos Mateu-Mestre
4. Figure Drawing by Andrew Loomis
5. The Atlas of Human Anatomy and Surgery JM Bougery
6. Drawing the Head and Hands by Andrew Loomis
7. Figure Drawing by Michael Hampton
8. Force by Michael Mattesi
9. How to Render by Scott Robertson
10. Color and Light by James Gurney
11. The Skillful Huntsman by Scott Robertson/Mike Yamada/Khang Le/Felix
Yoon

>useful youtube channels

https://www.youtube.com/@mangamaterialsyoutube9454
https://www.youtube.com/@hidechannel2
>where to find art
https://www.wikiart.org/es
https://artvee.com/
>other useful sites
https://film-grab.com/
https://www.canva.com/colors/color-palettes/
https://line-of-action.com/practice-tools/figure-drawing
https://color.adobe.com/es/create/color-wheel

MANY OF THESE BOOKS ARE AVAILABLE AS FREE PDF FILES ONLINE, GOOGLE AROUND.also check e-hentai

No. 1700596

File: 1694987297708.jpeg (67.16 KB, 735x528, 1669738774951.jpeg)

I am so fucking tired of women being held to the same standards as men in art. History has shown us women dont rape, kidnap, torture, and kill like men do, so why are women held at the same, if not higher standar than men?.
I will always be pro women drawing whatever the fuck they want, even if it's gross shit, same thing doesn't apply to men. If you think otherwise you are a retarded MRA that is desperately trying to pretend women are as bad as men. If women were as a bad as men we would have female jeffrey dahmer, women marrying little boys in middle eastern countries, men fearing going out late at night. I still stand that i would rather have a female shotafag artist than a female DDLG, Maledom, male-gaze artist. That bitch who wrote 50 shades did more damage to women than any female shotfag with 50 followers could do to boys. If women were as bad as men, as MRAs think, we would live in a more equal world, but we dont. Women fear men, men don't. Men are allowed to draw whatever disgusting shit they want and have a following, like mossa, women cant even draw a reverse harem gentle femdom webtoon without being called misandrist racists. The ''two wrongs dont make a right'' bullshit doesnt even make sense, because men make all the wrongs, yet women are the only ones paying for it. So yeah, I stand with women drawing whatever the fuck they want.

No. 1700627

>>1700625
>doesnt know about the queen
go back newfag

No. 1700644

>>1700596
> I will always be pro women drawing whatever the fuck they want, even if it's gross shit, same thing doesn't apply to men
Same here, i may get grossed out and laugh if what they draw is gross or ridiculous but i'll still side with them than with a scrote.

No. 1700646

>>1700596
Prepare yourself for the horde of twitter tourists getting angry at you kek

No. 1700672

>>1700644
yeah, i think all male pedophiles should be shoot on sight, but i think women can like shota without being pedos, or if they do are they can get therapy and change. There is a reason why men commit 98% of crimes, even the trannies with ''uwu feminine brain'' still commit more sexual crimes than women. I don't believe men can change, they are all inherently inmmature perverted creatures. When i was 14-17 i was a huge shotafag, i obviously wasnt nor are a pedo, i just liked femdom and cute boys and there was NOTHING cattering to me, it was all either dorito chin bishies, roided freaks and tons and tons of maledom shit, and all the femdom was sissy shit or dominatrix women for scrotes. Eventually i grew out of it and started drawing my own shit, so from personal experience i can see why a woman would like shota without being a pedo. Men cant even get rejected by some girl without raging and going on a mass shooting spree, they are low iq creatures and i am honestly very offended i am getting put on the same level as the sex that pays to rape gorillas in makeup. I think female shotafags are either just into cute boys, or have been abused in some way or another, i dont think none are capable or harming anyone but themselves. Also, literally no woman is making a male version of lolita/taxi driver/pretty baby/leon the professional/gravure idols, so it's safe to say no woman has interest in the real thing, unlike moids.

No. 1700675

>>1700672
>>1700596
What is the appeal in liking this art if it isn't because you're attracted to little boys lol

No. 1700688

>>1700675
i literally explained it on my post. Male characters come in two shapes most of the time, dorito chin bishie, and muscle pig. Some of us dont like those types, and our only alternative are ''shota characters''.

No. 1700690

>>1700688
Quite literally only true if you only consume anime

No. 1700694

>>1700690
irl moids (3DPD) are butt ugly though

No. 1700697

>>1700694
Kek true, but there's other art forms outside of anime and real people shows/movies/etc. I get it if you're a weeb and that's all you look at, but if you branch out, I promise you'll probably find something that fits the young, cute character type that isn't supposed to be a representation of a kid

No. 1700698

File: 1694999619828.jpg (84.3 KB, 736x1028, Fairydance.jpg)

>>1700688
Have you looked into fantasy art nona? Many of the men pictured in painterly fairy pics are pretty and lithe without a lot of dorito face.

No. 1700699

>>1700698
Can't you at least post something high res

No. 1700700

>>1700699
Sorry I got it off pinterest

No. 1700704

File: 1694999947086.png (274.2 KB, 600x315, genshit for ants.png)

>>1700690
I am not interested in 3dpd and western shows are shit. Videogames suffer a similar problem, too. Only dante and leon are attractive, although i hate their boring as fuck personalities, the rest are roided piggus, disgustingly old and realistic, or downright boring as fuck, so i intuitively end up liking the only fucking male characters in vidya that are allowed to have interesting cute personalities and designs, like pit/link/no9, who happen to be 'shotas'. Best example would be genshit, where there isnt a real ''shota'' equivalent, the ''shotas'' are on the same level as the flat girls, then it jumps straight into boring bishies and muscle pigs
>>1700697
how about you recommend something then
>>1700698
that's really fucking ugly, reminds me of those ai pictures where they turn the long haired fag from berserk into a 3DPD

No. 1700706

>>1700698
dorito chin, too muscular (the armor he's wearing has the appearance of bare muscles but green), humongous lanklet. please post a better example.

No. 1700707

File: 1695000100742.jpg (27.89 KB, 348x348, 46e054d2f5af642be0e69ffd75a7a2…)

>>1700704
Small genshin boys are a cute but don't you dare call Griffith a fag

No. 1700713

>>1700667
Act harder like you're actually from here

I swear twitter tourists don't even pretend to integrate anymore. Zoomers are mentally ill. Most of this general is the example.

No. 1700716

File: 1695000324363.jpg (28.83 KB, 564x669, c6e15a4ab74d7e27f14785fb418278…)

>>1700704
Why so hostile, nonnie? And Genshin character designs are terrible. There is no variety at all. It's all over-designed, tropey garbage. If you are only looking for anime-style games, then of course anything outside of that style will be ugly to you. Personally, I like cute boys so I look at a lot of final fantasy and kingdom hearts fanart. There's also chinese video games(not genshin) that I play that feature lots of cute, feminine men. You just need to expand your horizons.
>>1700713
Before a couple months ago, people were actually against shota here. Most of the talk wasn't even about nonsense like this and had many recognizable cows.

No. 1700720

>>1700716
She's just gonna say he has a dorito chin, too many muscles, and isn't 5 feet tall

No. 1700725

>>1700716
I dont like jrpgs, sorry. I dont understand why you are so mad, sorry i dont like the same fags you do, not like i have 525 animes and 385 videoogames with cute characters to choose from like moids. Isnt sora from KH a 'shota' too? so i dont understand what's your point , seems like you are sperging because someone else doesnt find the same characters you do attractive.

No. 1700726

>>1700704
>Dante and Leon have boring personalities
So you don't have a personality at all kek they're polar opposites and you put them in the same boat

No. 1700727

>>1700725
Just stop being a crab and go find your own sources of inspiration. Every single suggestion you just shoot down immediately. Go and be free! Dunno why you think only moids play vidya and watch anime. If you really only want shotas then go somewhere else to find shotas. There aren't shotas here.

No. 1700729

>>1700726
i just think they are boring
>>1700727
why are you so mad at me? you asked why a person not into 3DPD would be into shota characters and i answered, you didnt like my answer and started sperging about it when i didnt inmmediately like the things you recommended, which were the same things i was complaining about. Men have a bazillion pieces of media to choose from, so them gravitationg towards a generic loli instead of some anime girl with the same personality that's not a loli is more telling than someoe with extremely limited options to choose from.

No. 1700733

>>1700725
Never said I liked Sora in particular. And I'm not sperging, you literally said
>how about you recommend something then
>>1700729
Nta but I'm >>1700675 The person you're responding to is not me. People are just saying you're options aren't limited. It just sounds like you only like characters that look like shotas, which if thats the case, then just own it.

No. 1700735

>>1700729
I am NTA; were you the same anon doing this in the last thread? Just draw your ideal boy and make him an OC.

No. 1700740

>>1700733
i just like cute male characters and there are fucking none, i already spent my teenage years hoping from idolshit for women, to shoujo, to sports anime to no avail. I do like ensemble stars, though, probably the only gacha for women i actually do enjoy the art and character's personalities, probably because it feels like a genderbent version of something like im@s.
>>1700735
i already do, this all started because anon asked why someone that's not a pedophile would be into shota, i answered from someone who doesnt like 99% of male characters. I even used to watch harem shit for moids like onegai teacher because it was the only type of anime willing to make cute submissive male characters.

No. 1700745

Thread ruin

No. 1700766

>>1700763
sanest response

No. 1700774

>>1700745
The lack of actual salt is making me ill.

No. 1700781

What the fuck did I just walk into

No. 1700792

File: 1695007788571.jpeg (1.34 MB, 1125x2017, F43EBA4F-9FB1-4774-8440-73C587…)

Forgive me if this has been talked about but I keep seeing zoomers say they’re going to steal or take inspiration from ai art. Fuck ai art it’s equally as retarded but they really think they’re owning aifags with “stealing” the already shit designs and drawing their own shit art. Zoomers do the same shit with artists that are “problematic”, yeah i’m sure the creator of Ranfren is offended a 14 year old is claiming her OCs as their own. Lazy uncreative little shit heads that want shortcuts to the simplest shit, if you want inspiration open a fucking magazine or book or google images. Or go outside, I saw a cool ass old man with a parrot on his shoulder today and my mind was teeming with ideas from him.

No. 1700799

>>1700792
> the creator of Ranfren
what did she do? isnt she just an edgy tif, how did she offend her fellow edgy tifs?

No. 1700832

File: 1695010961957.png (86.58 KB, 382x283, ignore the red lines its from …)

>>1700799
There was a whole google doc callout but that's gone now but retarded ass shit. I could only find a doc from a fan that's responding to the callout but here's just my shitty rundown based on it.
>drawing the character Nyen completely pitch black therefore it's blackface
>art of an ouija board with a swastika on it
>one of the characters has a the same sweatshirt as nevada-tan
>using the n word in some way
>drawing racist "ratmen" asian stereotype characters, but were supposedly instead inspired by a mouse Touhou character
>something to do with pedo or incest art?
>retweeting porn of Randal
>drawing pedobear
>the character nana's design is transphobic

No. 1700836

>>1700832
fascinating, it's funny to see tifs eat echother alive. Would love to read the google doc callout, i wonder if its archived somewhere.

No. 1700887

File: 1695012461546.png (2.42 MB, 1648x2026, shit collage.png)

>>1700832
Samefag I dug through a Twitter thread and found more including a Russian translation of the original doc that's still up so I'll just screencap some of the shit. She posted or reblogged an image of a memorial for the bodies of native Canadian children found, in between two posts about yaoi shit. She also reblogged gore art of Randal. Isn't she a Russian of course she's had edgy humor. Never let your art pander or be attractive to zoomies anons.

No. 1700905

File: 1695013402345.png (130.08 KB, 720x668, 1kogito1.png)

>>1700887
>Never let your art pander or be attractive to zoomies anons.
Reminds me of another dumb tiktok/twitter drama involving zoomers and a google document.

No. 1700908

>>1700887
you genuinely need ovaries of steel to be a female artist online, no wonder so many female artists become pickmes. Imagine having to walk on eggshells because your fanbase is all retarded terminally online women who are always on the look out to see you commit a mistake to hunt you down, horrifying. I am glad i never got into ranfren

No. 1700910

>>1700905
what happened nonny? what did she/he do to deserve a fucking 114 manifesto

No. 1700915

>>1700905
I hate that I recognize that artist, he draws furry bara shit right? Zoomers need to learn that to just assume that if an artist is a furry they're going to be weird in some way. Sucks that doc is also down tho I want to read it. Kogito posts his art on TikTok though so honestly what did he expect, weird to post your borderline furry porn shit on an app full of 14 year olds with such an insane algorithm that you can never control who exactly sees your posts.

No. 1700917

>>1700915
https://files.catbox.moe/c34vl6.pdf

Here's the doc nona, I had a good laugh while reading it. It only serves as an incentive for me to stay as far away from tiktok as possible.

No. 1700922

File: 1695014979026.png (127.92 KB, 720x1362, contents.png)

>>1700910
Except for a couple of things, the 'controversies' are very silly in my opinion. Typical zoomer behavior. But hey, at least she's not drawing lolicon or shotacon.

No. 1700925

>>1700922
holy shit, let me get my coffee ready

No. 1700942

File: 1695016738363.png (712.94 KB, 768x1920, real human consciousness.png)

>>1700917
Thank you anon! This is amazing, I never thought I would see a furry artist respond to angry callouts from bored kids with screenshots from Talking Angela, or people mad because they think he's drawn incest art of Where's My Water characters. These kids got the wrong ages of the Talking Tom characters because they thought the age of the app Google gives you is the age of the character, that's how retarded TikTok kids are. To be completely honest though, he (she?) completely set himself up for this by posting on TikTok so I don't feel bad at all. You draw a bunch of lewd images and porn of characters zoomers will recgonize and be nostalgic for, on an app well known for it's young userbase, don't be surprised if they start chimping out over it.

No. 1700944

File: 1695016833304.png (379.53 KB, 831x406, autism.png)

>>1700922
wow i am not even half-way through it and this makes me so mad. This poor woman got tons of shit for absolutely no fucking reason. I wonder why this happens? Mossa draws loli guro openly and he's still respected by the twitter community, meanwhile this poor girl cannot draw a fucking shitpost comic of some blob and a cocodrile without being called a pedo. Why is it always women, or artists that draw a content targetted at women, being called out and targetted?

No. 1700945

>>1700942
isnt the artist ESL? considering how skilled they are compared to the average western zoomie artist i can see them being completly oblivious to western faggotry. It's a shame she had to excuse herself.

No. 1700960

>>1700908
The trick is to not give a fuck. Online harassers are like animals: they can smell weakness.
Someone accuses you of being a zoophile? Laugh at them. Someone calls you a pedo? Oh, fuck off. And so on.
Oddly enough, it works.

No. 1700964

>>1700960
i understand, but i cannot imagine it not affecting your mental health in some way, i wasn't expecting the comments calling her a pedo/zoo to have thousands of likes… that's fucking depressing.

No. 1700988

>>>/ot/1700040
Did you hear it from that guy who draws PASWG style street fighter fan art?
>>>/ot/1699849
His works make my blood boil.

No. 1701085

File: 1695039405678.jpg (50.36 KB, 710x472, 9a736d8b57174ae09bc1c2eb60abdb…)

>>1700792
It started with referencing is ok. Then straight up copying is ok because no one owns anything. Then using 3D models/assets or photobashing everything is ok. Then tracing is ok. Then using premade brushes to stamp hands and eyes like you're Tim Buckley is ok. Now AI is ok as long as you act ironic about it, kek.

Not necessarily against most of these things it's just funny and I wonder how far it will go. Artists have never been more apable to learn and stunted by shortcuts and lazy tricks at once.

No. 1701294

>>1701208
>HypnotistSappho
>woman
HypnotistSappho is a tranny, nonna.

No. 1701300

>>1700905
>Springtrap pfp
>Woman that draws femgazey yaoi content
Why are fnaf fans so based?

No. 1701407

>>1701294
anon is probably deeply retarded and thinks the rise of ''female'' predators is actual women and not trannies. Female predators arent ''getting away'' with being predators, that's just a MRA lie. Female predators are treated even worse than male predators, that's why female shota artists get called out more than loli male artist and why >>1700917 got called a pedo for a shitty comic

No. 1701457

Do people still talk about wacom? I’ve had them for years but using other brands and stuff I can’t think of a reason why pen, not display, but the pen tablets cost as much as an iPad. Idk they feel like the apple of drawing tablets

No. 1701490

I dont really have much of an opinion on anything but I felt like sharing my observation that everytime I come across shota, by come across I mean being in a manga reader site and spotting a shota manga among all the other recently uploaded or popular manga, it's obviously male gazey and 99% of the time mixed with some older sister or big titty mommy character.

No. 1701498

>>1701300
Have you seen his twitter he’s a typical gay furfag he just got popular by exposing 12 years olds tiktok to furfaggotry

No. 1701506

>>1700908
I am just too much of a loner to socialize much so nobody even knows I am female.
Uploading fanart since 2006, never had a call out.

No. 1701507

>>1701457
I'm still using the wacom tablet I bought 10 years ago. They don't make 'em like this anymore.

No. 1701509

File: 1695083161752.jpg (56.28 KB, 720x810, 1kogito1.jpg)

>>1701498
It worked though. Which leads me to wonder if it is worth having that many followers even if they are all zoomies.

No. 1701519

>>1700917
Everytime I see people posting such accusations it's fucking instagram, which attracts IMO the same brainlets as tiktok. The central issue of both places is that they are much, much more mainstream and casual than other, more fandom centered places. Even twitter is way, waaaay more fandom centered than these places. Twitterfags are mostly hybrids with a political and a fandom oriented side. Instagrammers and tiktokers are just fullblown normalfags that don't even have a concept of fandom.

Artist is mainly a fujo I know. She's drawing sfw shipping art, mostly of Optimus and Megatron or some anime. Complaints I see a lot are "Why?", "BUT THIS IS A CARTOON!?!?", "Why are you showing me this".
This not only reveals that they don't know what a fandom or shipping is, they are also not aware of what algorithms are, since they are often asking shit like "Why do you want to show me this?", not understanding that it's not the artist that chooses to make a pic appear on some rando's timeline.
In short, it's stupid normalfags. This is why those places are shit since they throw all types of people together that should never meet.

No. 1701526

File: 1695084918705.gif (92.53 KB, 490x498, hmmMMMMMM.gif)

>>1701509
i'm really curious to know where he's from
i legit believe gringos give more shit to foreign artist than they do their own. The exception is like, idk shitty discord servers with "inclusive" retards that eventually dox eachother over saying the wrong thing
but even them i feel like a lot of them HAVE to cover for eachother when they fuck up due to their contradictory and vague silent rules, otherwise they would have like fifty callouts each

No. 1701538

Why are 80% of female pose models wearing high heels or standing on their tip toes? Sometimes I feel like I’m better off looking at stock photos as reference

No. 1701550

>>1701526
This is 100% the case but it’s not a matter of foreigner vs non foreigner, people just love dogpiling. I explicitly remember one of the morons shitting on an artist for drawing a spiderverse character with “too light” skin later retweeting and praising ugly fanart (that their friend drew) of Zoro from One Piece with neon lemon yellow “racist caricature” tier skin. Both instances boil down to a matter of stylization but only one person gets a 10 million likes quote tweet callout for racism. It’s all arbitrary bullshit they want to play victim with. If someone they like does it, it doesn’t matter.

No. 1701565

>>1701490
yeah that's why people arent defending shota itt, only women drawing shota, which are extremely rare and when they do it's something like kuroshitsuji.

No. 1701642

I don't hold women in moid standards, I hold them in human standards. This isn't even about shota but if you find yourself looking at rotting mammal carcasses as reference to furnish your jjba toilet human fantasies, maybe you will benefit in staying offline for a while. Sure, women disproportionately do not harm others compared to men. But you can harm yourself from consuming degen shit kek. This is coming from someone who got exposed to moid lolisho rape of anime characters I watched as early as 10 yo. Which sent me to a rabbit hole of getting off to unhealthy rape shit I'm trying to wean off today. I'm not based just because I get off on things that men normally get off to kek.
Beyond that we're just some anons in an image board. We do not hold power to stop you or anyone else from doing what they want.

No. 1701644

File: 1695097587094.jpg (27.4 KB, 510x510, 1694627432748.jpg)

>>1701642
being a shotafag saved me from being groomed when i was a tween. If i were one of those DDLG/maledom freaks like most of my classmates were(some who were groomed) i would 100% have been groomed too. That's why i would rather women be shotafreaks than maledom/ddlg freaks/male-gaze artist. Realize how the hatred t's always towards women drawing gore/shota, never towards the women drawing bdsm/male-gaze art/ddlg/maledom shit, which has actually hurt people irl(women) and is way more normalized and accepted than women into shota, which are like one in a bazillion.

No. 1701654

>>1701644
It may have saved you from being groomed (lol) but it didn't save you from being a retard this isn't fujo chan you fag stop derailing the thread.

No. 1701664

>>1701654
it's not derrailing, i am talking about the hypocrisy between women being allowed to draw maledom/ddlg/male-gaze/bdsm because it's fetishes approved and normalized by men but people losing their shit when a woman draws gore/shota or art that doesnt pander to the male-gaze. Either women are allowed to draw all freaky shit(like men) or none.

No. 1701674

Also there's shota art that's just a youthful boy but otherwise not infantalized. And then there's just shota content that is specifically about getting off to them being minors.

>>1701664
Kek I don't like them too. Anons were just shitting on a pickme woman artist in the previous thread.

No. 1701678

>>1701644
A lot of terminally online women grow up liking shota, but most of them outgrow it. The ones that grow up to become shotafags have problems. And why is gore lumped in with pedoshit?

No. 1701684

File: 1695102259655.jpeg (254.78 KB, 2048x1327, retard.jpeg)

>>1701678
how is gore different than shota? the absolute stacy drawing toilet dio isnt going to go turn men into human toilets, just like how yana toboso isnt going to go rape children. Women are capable of drawing the most heinous shit and not commit crimes. Men cant even play fucking videogames without getting their wires crossed and shooting people.
>>1701674
that doesnt change my point, one is way more popular than the other, one has actually hurt women, the other has like one anime(kuroshitsuji), and it's the least popular fetish amongst female artists. Pic rel is miles worse than a female shotafag, actually encourages abuse, and has 200k followers.

No. 1701688

>>1701644
I don't think getting exposed to shota as a tween completely saved you from anything. That shit shouldn't be exposed to kids until they fully develop their brains in the first place.
>>1701684
>that doesnt change my point, one is way more popular than the other, one has actually hurt women, the other has like one anime(kuroshitsuji), and it's the least popular fetish amongst female artists. Pic rel is miles worse than a female shotafag, actually encourages abuse, and has 200k followers.
Then I suppose you're not really complaining about nonas shitting on shota here but more so the general culture. Again, I don't like them either. Though it's not the time for whataboutism. I firmly believe something's wrong, either with yourself or the culture you live in, once you start associating mutilating humans as a sexual thing whether you're a woman or a moid, whether you act on it or not.
Again, I'm not gonna mail your president to stop you from making that content if that floats your boat. I don't know about other anons, but my goal posting this is, if not to convince you, then others lurking to change their minds about it.

No. 1701697

>>1701498
People just think it's a guy because she doesn't announce she is a woman and is a degenerate it's pretty clear her drawings are fembrained and yaoi themed despite the degeneracy, if you're horny online but it isn't because of Leon Kennedy with a fat ass or something that makes it clear you're a woman people just think you are a guy. I can't be the only one that believes this, but again lolcow is retarded and some farmers thought that Lacryboy was a genuine scrote.

No. 1701705

>>1701688
>I don't think getting exposed to shota as a tween completely saved you from anything
believe it or not, it did. I used to expend most of my time on fb groups for retro games and anime so ended up developing friendships with older teens and men at 14, they would try to groom me and i would just respond ''ewww noo you arent my qte shota husbandoru!!!'''. If i was into ddlg shit i would have definetly been groomed into finding older men attractive and romantic, as many classmates my age did. I literally rejected all those faggots not because i realized how predatory it was, but because they werent my cute shota husbando(at the time), kek. I love you Kenny, thanks for saving me from gross men.
>I firmly believe something's wrong, either with yourself or the culture you live in, once you start associating mutilating humans as a sexual thing whether you're a woman or a moid, whether you act on it or not.
we are talking about fetishes, if you have any fetish there is something inherently wrong with you, normie couples have missionary once a month out of commitment for a reason. I never said guro wasn't wrong, just saying a woman drawing guro/shota is miles better than a pickme glorifying how her boyfriend abuses her, the latter has real life consequences, whereas the shota/gurofag isnt going to go murder men and rape children.

No. 1701722

>>1701705
My nona in christ. Anime shaped my artworks and tastes and I'm still gonna tell you there's plenty to criticize about it and it's community. I can argue you minors like us getting easy access to sexualized content (lolisho or otherwise, anime or otherwise) was the first step in the grooming pipeline. Hell, I didn't have to be into ddlg, I had my own shota husbando when I was a kid and yet I was susceptible to being manipulated if it weren't for my sister stepping in. In my case, getting exposed to lolisho content at a young age primed me to think children/girls and their vulnerability is desirable to be exploited. I'm glad you found a way not to get further exploited by males but it doesn't work that way all the time kek.

No. 1701727

>>1701722
I wasnt into lolisho porn like you, just into shota made for and by women, like south park fanart and kuroshitsuji. Always hated shota made for men, like boku no pico. Ofcourse you are going to become a pickme retard with raping fetishes if you grew up with pickme retard tastes made for and by men. That's why i am defending female artists being allowed to draw whatever they want, not lolisho specifically. Thankfully i managed to dodge both retarded female adoctrination propaganda like shojo, and male adoctrination propaganda like everything else. I am not going to deny i am a degen, but i am happy being a male ryona/femdom degen, and not a maledom/male-gaze/ddlg pickme retard. I am sorry you are the latter, i dont envy you.

No. 1701741

File: 1695118095612.png (92.28 KB, 836x605, F6VgOZTXUAAVYk1.png)

Just found someone charging $90 for editing pokemon sprites, if I knew people are open to spent that much on them when I was 12 I would've gotten rich kek I used to do sprite edits all the time.
The only ok thing on this sheet are the portraits since they seem made fully from scratch, but that price tag is still too big considering their size and limited colors.

No. 1701802

What's the problem with you shotafags?
They behave like apes at the slightest criticism. It doesn't matter if you have never "touched a real child" in your life, you have questionable taste and deserve people to look at you strangely for that. So you better put up with it, because when they put you on the defensive like that you look like the men you criticize so much.

No. 1701818

>>1701741
The "original styles" rings a bell. Is this the Twitterfag with a large following all because he does nostalgic Earthbound-style sprites?His friend circle fucking sucks.

No. 1701825

>>1701818
The post just showed up on my recomended page so I dunno who that guy is, but yeah when I checked his page he has like 40k followers.

No. 1701839

File: 1695134805984.png (430.83 KB, 743x362, nve.png)

>>1700905
They were calling this CP? I'm out lol

No. 1701845

>>1701825
just checked and it's not the same guy but damn their styles are too similar

No. 1701885

>>1701802
They want to seem morally correct in some way by using their gender as a shield out of guilt for flicking it to little children

No. 1701896

>>1701644
You were attracted to shotas as a tween because they looked yoir age smart-ass.

No. 1701903

>>1701644

it's one thing to consume lolisho when you're a kid and eventually grow out of it when you become and adult. it's a phase.

what people are trying to say here is that if you're an adult woman who's still into lolisho then you're a gross degen because you should've grown out of it ages ago and even though you're not acting on it you're still getting off to/attracted by the representation of a child which is fucked up at the very least.

No. 1701926

>>1701802
>>1701885
no, i just hate you people jumping to say ''omg you are as bad as men, double standars!!!'' like retarded MRAs. I am not even a shotafag, i just defend women drawing whatever they like, and if freaks like >>1701684 are allowed to draw their disgustign shit, so should the 2 or 3 female shotafags and guro artists. I am just putting it in perspective, and female shotafags are genuinely the lesser evil when people like the author of 50 shades is given the green light to make it a movie. I repeat, more women have died thanks to pickme behaviour being pushed by media, than any child or male has been hurted by shota/gurofags. I will stop surporting female shota/gorefags when people stop defending bdsm art as ''a kink''. Until then, men deserve to be cosified too.
>>1701896
everyone else was into bishies so idk. kenny is canonically like 9 and when he was my husbando i was 14/15. do you think that agegap IRL would be normal? I just liked cute boys, shrimple as.
>>1701903
do you think yana toboso is a pedo? some women just like to draw cute boys, nothing wrong with that. Men drawing loli are 100% perverts, though.

No. 1701946

>>1701926
>>1701903
>>1701896

Women who draw/consume shotashit are weird and disgusting, they need to grow tf up and its okay to laugh at them imo. But the men who make and get off to the same shit will always be worse because they use it to justify being real life pedophiles, justify their warped beliefs that women expire when they reach the age of consent, and they will hurt a child eventually. So kind of agree with both sides here. Kennynona, why not project those feelings onto a grown up version of your husbando. There's plenty to choose from.

No. 1701954

>>1701741
The price is fine if people are willing to pay it. If you’re only charging $30 for something like the bottom left you should respect your own time and charge more for your art

No. 1701955

>>1701946
>why not project those feelings onto a grown up version of your husbando.
that's retarded, imagine if moids cared this much about some character's age. Most waifufags have waifus that are at most 15. At this point i have realized that no matter how you sugarcoat it, as long as you are female or drawing female gaze art you are going to be nitpicked to death like >>1701839 . So why not just say ''fuck it'' and do whatever we want, like moids? we are going to get judged more harshly anyways, so might as well just rip the bandaid and own it.

No. 1701975

>>1701955
Agreed. I'm sorry, but I just don't give a shit if some nerdy women like writing fanfiction or drawing fan art of South Park characters.

No. 1701996

>>1701975
i will genuinely only start caring for female shotafags when
1-people, specially women, stop justifying BDSM as a safe kink
2-mainstream media stops pushing gross maledom shit to women(fuck literally all romance shojo shit)
3-men actually start being scared of women and not only use the ''female teacher pedo'' boogeyman when they are trying to justify women being totes as evil as men
4-women stop being called out for the dumbest of shist that moids do on the dozen
until then, female shotafags drawing south park boys kissing is the lesser evil and hold less risk to safety than some pickme retard glorifying her boyfriend treating her like shit and saying to men ''see? women LIKE being choked!!''. If being considered worse than a shotafag helps a pickme stop drawing male pandering shit that actually hurt women, then so be it.

No. 1702022

>>1701644
When will anons realize genders flock together on social media and women have common sense to call out degeneracy, whereas men would rather partake in it

No. 1702029

File: 1695149164648.png (138.9 KB, 358x276, lmao lol.png)

>>1702022
>women have common sense to call out degeneracy
except they dont, women never call out actual pedos or men drawing disgusting shit, they call out other women drawing mildly degen shit that's harmless. I don't care if pickme retards feel morally superior for calling out a girl drawing south park yaoi, i will always side with the south park fujo. Mossacannabis has 300k followers, where is his cancellation? but nah, those retards would rather cancell the ranfren TIF for drawing swastikas or that webtoon chick for drawing gentle femdom.

No. 1702035

>>1702022
Women only call out degeneracy if it's by other women kek. This talk happened one or two threads ago but moids don't care if you call them out on their degen shit because they're proud of it and often get their whiteknights to to attack you back while women tend to fold much faster if dogpiled on with accusations hence why we always see women fighting and calling out each other online for the most ridiculous shit and moids get to thrive with an actual following.

No. 1702036

File: 1695149463326.jpeg (32.65 KB, 458x327, E8UqyEXWEAMAg-g.jpeg)

Could you recommend any low cost screen recording program? I'd like to record small snippets of how I draw hair or something. But my computer is shit and lags when I'm using heavy record software.
Extra points if the software have editing tools aswell

No. 1702038

>>1702036
how about obs? i use davinci for editing but dunno if its too heavy

No. 1702041

>>1702035
mossacannabis is followed by professionals like dave rapozza and other professionals too. Moralfagging over drawings only applies to women.

No. 1702044

>>1702029
>>1702035
Women call out other women because they are women spaces. Women don't follow these gross men, only other men do
>>1702036
OBS is free and you can control the size of your screen, so you can crop it to certain parts of your canvas if you'd like

No. 1702047

>>1702044
>Women don't follow these gross men, only other men do
yes they do, retard. There are a shit ton of female pickmes following that retard. He's also a huge artist, not a small coomer artist with 50 followers, he's followed by fucking professionals for god's sake.

No. 1702049

>>1702047
Okay then go make the callout post if you're so bitter so that women don't call out men. I'm just explaining to you why they don't.

No. 1702052

>>1702044

>Women don't follow these gross men, only other men do

Lmao you have a really innocent view of callout culture online then. Besides even if you don't follow them, one of the people you follow does and so their shit will appear on your TL because the algorithm will push it to you. In all of my years online be it on Twitter or Tumblr or whatever every time I saw a big callout rolling in it was women attacking other women with accusations ranging from reasonable to fucking stupid nitpicks nobody cares about, meanwhile moids with actual pedophilic fetishes get to freely advertise themselves, form a following or even get into the professional scene and almost nobody even lifts a finger against them. Women attack women because it's easier. Moids don't care about callouts because they're proud of their degeneracy and they know they have a bunch of coomer whiteknights to fall back on.

No. 1702058

File: 1695150251006.jpg (56.86 KB, 567x561, 12d.jpg)

>>1701802
You have been at this for like, days now kek, let it rest you obsessed sperg.

No. 1702059

>>1702052
Again, be the change you want to see in the world. If I have to keep seeing this take in this thread for weeks on end, then why don't you guys just do something about it? There's clear reasoning behind that moss guy being a pedo, and I'm sure women would be on your side. Men don't care though, so they won't listen. He'll keep his audience, but that's not womens fault

No. 1702060

>>1701955
Fair enough. It's still weird to thirst over fictional little boys because pedophilia is so normalized and partaking in something adjacent doesn't fix the problem? Pedophile men also lack a gender preference because their "attraction" is just destruction of innocence, so they'll probably get off to some nerdy girl's South Park fics too. But I agree that men drawing lolisho will always be worse, and that BDSM is inherently abusive.

No. 1702064

>>1702029
>>1702047
>>1702052
I hope this Mossacannabis fag goes the Shadman route and becomes a homeless heroin junkie kek

No. 1702067

>>1702049
it's literally not true though, specially not mossa, who outside of his baraag draws appealing sfw art. I have several female mutuals following him who mostly draw men. I don't see the point in cancelling a moid when everyone knows neither he nor the people that follow him care, people will always make excuses for male artists. Dragonmaid it's extremely popular with zoomer girls for some reason, have they ever stopped watching it or called out the moid author for his loli fetish? nah, they would rather callout lardasses thots with onlyfas for cosplaying the obvious pedoshit loli character.

No. 1702069

>>1702059
I'm not saying it's necessarily the women's fault that people like Mosscannabis exist, I'm just explaining why it's bullshit to say women have "more common sense to call out degeneracy" and that most women on the online scene are more willing to harshly condemn other women for shit that's usually meaningless or "offensive" than to turn on a moid who actually creates harmful content or behaves in harmful manners.

No. 1702071

>>1702059
lmaoo remember when that guy minus8 came out as a fucking pedo who fantasizes about irl children? it was at the same time as the kooleen drama, and art drama youtubers would rather make 30 minute sperging videos about kooleen's ''racist behaviour'' because she didnt want to draw uggos or something. None of them did a video on minus8 even though he's one of the most popular online animators. Cancel culture simply doesn't apply to men, that's why shadman was allowed to draw irl children getting molested for years without anyone calling him out.

No. 1702075

>>1702067
Tell your mutuals then that they're supporting someone like him. I'm not saying women don't commonly call out other women while not calling out men, but I'm just saying there are reasons why. And e-thots who cosplay underage anime girls suck, but women don't have enough power to callout the men who make them in general. Also, your posts are incredibly obvious because of your capitalization, nona.
>>1702071
>>1702069
You guys are right in that cancel culture doesn't apply to men. Women are easier targets because they have less power than men. But I still think both should be called out rather than just focusing on one or the other. I don't get why people are whining that women call out other women instead of men, when they should focus on just calling everyone out instead. Sure, this is the artist salt thread where you're meant to be salty about it, but it's redundant to see everyone say the same five things over and over without discussing any ways to fix it

No. 1702078

>>1702071
Tbf, minus8 having a pedo meltdown happens every year or so. He's as self-loathing as he is attention hungry. He's been posting the same Nintendo EPI shit online for 15 years so if he hasn't been called out by now, he won't ever be.

No. 1702080

>>1702071
shadman was only really called out for being a shitty friend to his newgrounds' friend groups. Especially when it has to do with Oneyplays. (this is a derail though, and not art related.) It's weird how much male degen artists are praised and never really in trouble

No. 1702086

File: 1695151648649.jpg (66.05 KB, 1168x1168, _.jpg)

So, who is going to do the mossacannibalism call out post? I have access to his baraag and can provide screenshots, but I don't have twitter because I only publish on pixiv.

No. 1702089

>>1702078
Minus8 did that one disgusting Ankha animation right. Maybe I've been living under a rock but what does EPI mean?
>>1702080
I can name so many sick fuck male artists who get away with vile shit. It just confirms that callout culture in art/fandom spaces is a misogyny problem; it is only used to harass and silence women who were often victims of grooming themselves, once they hit the male-established expiration date where it is no longer socially acceptable for women artists to have a platform.

No. 1702092

File: 1695151898653.png (370.19 KB, 800x900, 74f3a388d4a45509f98b2f1c50fc4c…)

>>1702075
you read my post about women cancelling thots for cosplaying kanna, while making excuses about the original source(made by a man) being totes wholesome and your conclusion is ''yeah, the thots suck!!''. You are the problem, nonny. People are complaining becaue only women are being called out, and not even for real reasons, just retarded nitpicks. Or do you seriously think the ranfren TIF did anything seriously bad to get cancelled over? c'mon, you are just justifying women gettig harassed, i have never seen a callout towards a woman be anything but nitpicks like drawing a brown character one shade lighter or some other equal retarded shit. Does anyone remember this girl? she got harassed for ''cultural appropiation'' to the point she deleted her account at some point. Imagine if twitterfaggots actually harassed lolifags with this much determination.
>>1702086
kek, literally no one is going to give a shit. People probably already know, it's not a well-kept secret.

No. 1702093

>>1702086
Do it yourself on a throwaway account. You have no presence or identity on Twitter so you have nothing to lose by exposing a freak. Turn off all Twitter notifications and be prepared to face a barrage of death threats because the worst thing you can do to a male is say no or criticize a fellow male who draws his jackoff material.

No. 1702096

>>1702075
>women don't have enough power to callout the men who make them in general
>cancel culture doesn't apply to men
>women are easier targets because they have less power than men

You're literally agreeing with them. If men get called out, people stop giving a fuck after 5 minutes and they still have loyal fans. Just look at men like Projared, or ZeRo (zerowondering) who admitted to sexting with and asking a 14 year old girl for nudes, left the internet, then backtracked 6 months later and said he never did it. They'll never reach their old success levels, but a lot of people don't give a fuck. If women get called out, everyone they knows goes scorched earth. It's the same reason why MtFs get millions of asspats everywhere they go, but nobody gives a fuck about FtMs. These women who call out other women for drawing shitty South Park yaoi but not freaky pedophile men who use literal CP as references because they are misogynistic handmaidens. Even if a woman wanted to call out somebody like Mossa, they'd be drowned out by his loyal coomers and pickmes. I also routinely see popular female artists (such as niceupdog) make vague posts about hating loli while regularly interacting with male artists who draw explicit loli porn of 10 year olds. I don't understand how the cognitive dissonance doesn't give them an aneurysm.

Just look at this from the last thread:
>>1697604
>>1699034
She said no NSFW and he drew softcore porn of her anyways. Do you really think it's worth it for her to tell him to stop and get his followers sicc'd on her, and possibly have her own followers turn on her?

No. 1702098

File: 1695152276749.png (Spoiler Image,1 MB, 1280x1512, eahKilA.png)

>>1702089
EPI is coomerspeak for Early Porn Introduction aka the fetish for exposing children to porn. Minus8 is a popular artist for because of his simple, colorful style and obsession with Nintendo and other younger-skewing media. I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong with blending cute and sexy, but his jarringly kawaii pedoshit is the visual equivalent of a van full of candy.

No. 1702100

>>1702098
Thank you for the info but this pedo shit, basically a grooming fetish, makes me want to alog so bad. It explains so much about online spaces being infested with coomer pedo freaks who are constantly defended by their rabid fans.

No. 1702106

>>1702100
Remember that at the end of the day, loli, shota, zoo or anything 'degenerate' is ultimately just pixels on a page that have never hurt or groomed a single real person. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either miserable or jealous. You are valid for using porn to cope, and your favorite artists support your choice of self-medication. There is no such thing as a porn addiction.(bait/unintegrated)

No. 1702111

File: 1695153113854.jpg (517.25 KB, 800x715, 70291197_p23.jpg)

>>1702106
women arent doing this shit, it doesn't matter how much you try to compare male degeneracy to female degeneracy. We both know female shotafags arent drawing something as heinous as shadman/minus8/mossa, it's unfair to compare men drawing lolis raped and shred to pieces then urinated to…this. That's why i defend the right for women to draw whatever they want, not shota specifically. I know women aren't capable of ever doing something as hideous as shadman unless they are pickme retards.

No. 1702115

>>1702092
>>1702111
We get it, women get called out more, shota is good and you like it but you're also not a shotacon, what else can we do about it or are you just going to keep complaining to complain
>>1702096
Yeah, I'm not disagreeing with them, I'm just wondering why this point keeps getting brought up but remains stunted. Women tend to call out other women because (like many people on this imageboard for some reaosn), they're also more ingrained in "fandom culture" and talk about fandoms and art like it's politics. They take things too serious. But about the girl, she should mention that and his 100s of loli drawings. She could also mention him being a stonetoss supporter. There's many things, but I agree it would probably do more harm than good to her. Which sucks, because this should be considered sexual harassment to draw NSFW of the likeness of a real person without their consent.
>>1702106
>There is no such thing as a porn addiction.
What is this grand psyop kek

No. 1702118

>>1702115
>There is no such thing as a porn addiction.
>What is this grand psyop kek
that anon is either baiting or shitposting, what a weird af post.

No. 1702119

>>1702115
>We get it, women get called out more, shota is good and you like it but you're also not a shotacon, what else can we do about it or are you just going to keep complaining to complain
this board can be so dumb sometimes, i could repeat everything i say three times in bold letters and retards are going to misunderstand it anyways. I will repeat my points one last time. Women=/=men. Shota made by men=pedophilia, shota made by women=just cute boy shit like south park yaoi. BDSM/maledom/male gaze is worse than shota drawn by women, as it has actually hurt people(women) IRL. No, i dont condone all shota. No, i am not a shotafag, when i was a shotafag i was watching kuroshitsuji and southpark fanmedia(made by women), not boku no pico(made by men). Women never get called out for real problematic stuff, it's always dumb shit no one cares. Men never get called out and are allowed a massive following(even by industry pros) when they draw heinous stuff. People, specially some women, will make excuses to defend obvious moid shit(dragon maid) but then go harass women for doing the same thing(lardasses cosplaying kanna). From experience i am glad i grew up liking shota rather than misogynistic propaganda(kaichou wa maid sama, for example).

No. 1702120

>>1702118
>>1702115
Pretty sure it's ironic, kek.

No. 1702121

>>1702111
>men drawing lolis raped and shred to pieces then urinated
nta but imagine having the guts to write this sentence just to whine/shitpost about people not liking shotas yet again, jfc

No. 1702122

>>1702121
lmao it's not about people not liking shotas, never was. Please learn to read. Also the >men drawing lolis raped and shred to pieces then urinated it's literally what shadman drew of the X-men underage actress.

No. 1702124

>>1702119
I agree with these points, and maybe others itt too but don't realize it yet. The whole infighting/callouts between women making problematic art feels like a smokescreen to deflect from men who are doing actual awful shit.
>>1702120
Probably but it came across as earnest or baity.

No. 1702125

>>1702111
>We both know female shotafags arent drawing something as heinous as shadman/minus8/mossa,
Nonna, I've come across more shota gurofags than softcore or vanilla.

No. 1702132

>>1702125
literally untrue, kuroshitsuji/south park BL has waaaaaaaay more fanart than shota gore. I checked gelbooru with filters off because maybe shotafags got real wild once i stopped following them, and there are only two pages and only ONE shota guro artist, of like the million of hyper realistic loli/woman guro artists. Stop lying just to try to win an internet fight, women will never be as bad as men it doesn't matter how many boogeymen you try to create out of thin air.

No. 1702134

>>1702124
What's wrong with anons agreeing with that post but still believing women aren't above criticism? I'm trying to find a direct post saying women are just as bad as men for liking degen.

No. 1702139

>>1702134
read last thread, there was a retard even blaming women for some tranny grooming children.

No. 1702152

Can we move away from the shota debates, it's literally only like 4 people engaging in this. Nobody cares, less than half the people in this thread actually draw anyway so it's not like their opinions will cause waves in the art industry anyway. Anyway, does anyone else despise procreate? I came back to Paint Tool Sai after ditching it for an iPad and it really wasn't worth my time nor money. I feel like paint tool sai is hardly used by anyone new, or anyone who's a non-asian artist. Procreate is so shitty and it takes up so much space that I can barely use it.

No. 1702159

>>1702152
I remember watching so many speedpaints on youtube of paint tool sai and being amazed. I was artistically obsessed with the selection tool and how it looked. I remember my first art program after MS paint was Paint.net, so of course getting the cracked Paint Tool Sai was like, touching gold for me

No. 1702167

>>1702159
There should be a fund to get a port of Sai to iOS. If it makes you feel better, Sai is still beloved by many Japanese artists. It's clunky and bare bones compared to almost every other program out there, but the brush engine is unmatched.

No. 1702188

>>1701839
I thought this was about the OddOnesOut at first.

No. 1702189

>>1702089
Ankha was zone.

No. 1702196

>>1702188
It is.

No. 1702201

>>1702196
Wait what? No one is saying his name with CTRL+F. I need a TL:DR because I don't know where to follow the replies.

No. 1702208

>>1702201
some artist drew that comic off oddsonesout netflix cartoon, the cocodrile and the white blob are underage so they were calling the artist pedo, even though the oddsoneout commented on the post

No. 1702210

>>1702208
Omg… Are people seriously calling two very cartoony drawings having maybe sex as being pedo material? This is so stupid. The people pushing that idea are fucking stupid.

No. 1702211

>>1702210
read the doc if you wanna lose the faith in zoomies, there were accussing her of pedophilia for drawing talking tom porn

No. 1702212

>>1702211
Yeah, I'm not interested anymore. This seems like some dumb virtue signaling without any actual proof of the person being a pedo. This isn't like Minus8 or Anubis. Twittertards really reach and attack anyone for the dumbest stuff.

No. 1702245

>>1702086
Do it nonna, make a list of all the popular artists/users who follow his accounts and post it here too because i’m interested. I think that if someone actually looked into ANY of these popular untouched lolicon moids and their followers they could find real pedos and connections, like what happened with the Giggly Goon Clown shit.

No. 1702268

>>1702208
The reason they're calling her a pedo is because the crocodile and "white blob" are the avatars of real people. The crocodile is one of the odd1sout friends he had in summer camp, meanwhile he himself is the white blob. It's like those coomers who draw porn of jaiden animations.

No. 1702372

>>1702152

I can literally sperg all day about how ass procreate is yet everyone is treating it like it's the best thing since sliced bread.

I hate how slippery the brushes are and how reliant it is on finicky hand gestures. people think they're hot shit for using such a weak ass program on an overpriced piece of machinery that can't even save files normally.
I also don't like how big professional artists touted it as being so accessible because it's "only $15" and people get suckered into buying an $800 piece of scrap metal and a shitty stylus just to say they have procreate and can draw with it.
But I think the thing I hate the most about it is how inundated we are now with 'procreate girlies' drawing shitty generic merch and making dumb tutorials on 'how to start an art/sticker business with procreate' making other, better resources harder to find.
There are way better free options out there and you can pry paint tool SAI and clip studio (though they're on thin fucking ice at the moment) from my cold dead hands. Fuck Procreate, and fuck iOS.

No. 1702394

>>1702036
OBS is very good and you can limit recording to specific fps (frames per second.) Lowering it to 3-5 fps might be better for performance and it will look better when sped up. Not sure if Canva has a watermark but I know they have a video editor but require an account. Seconding DaVinci if you can run it.

No. 1702395

>>1702372
NTA, but I personally love procreate. You don't need to come in here and try to tell people the art programs are better than others based on your personal take on it. For me, it's 1:1 and I like not having a delay. Also it's a one time purchase, they have great back compatibility for people who can't afford the newer tablets. Also not everyone has a desk area they can have a wancom on or an actual computer that can process photoshop and CSP. CSP is as bad as photoshop with charges. It is not free in the least bit.

No. 1702404

>>1702268
it's not even porn it's a goofy comic, james even commented on it

No. 1702407

>>1702395

Nowhere did I state Clip Studio was free. I swear, the reading comprehension is at an all time low.

It's good that it works for you, nona. It's the salt thread and I'm allowed to be salty about an art program. You don't need to come to its defense.

No. 1702408

>>1702372
i hate how procreate brushes only work on procreate

No. 1702421

>>1702407
Except everything you are saying is completely wrong.
>I hate how slippery the brushes are
Then adjust them
>how reliant it is on finicky hand gestures.
I've never used the gestures because any program that requires this, including phones, is garbage, so don't use it. It is not reliant on it at all, so I don't know what you are talking about. It's an accessibility option.
>how inundated we are now with 'procreate girlies' drawing shitty generic merch
You mean every single art program that anyone can use to create such merch

You just sound mad for some reason. These aren't critiques you think they are. You can have an opinion, but not when you're being personally mad about even something as simple as accessibility for people who could use it. Do you always use the talk-to-text on your phone? No, because you probably don't need that accessibility.

No. 1702461

>>1702372
Procreate may not be as robust as most paid softwares but it's 10 dollars. How much are you expecting out of software that cheap?

No. 1702479

File: 1695195530494.png (422.49 KB, 477x471, 27921354.png)

What are some mangas with incredible inking?

No. 1702487

File: 1695195953084.jpg (393.57 KB, 980x1400, ExZqpOZVoAITk5h.jpg)

>>1702479
Another one I like. I realized I prefeer when mangakas use more western techniques.

No. 1702510

>>1700570
>>1700575
There are women only busses due to the problem of rape in Japan

No. 1702531

File: 1695198219893.jpeg (448.6 KB, 1914x1080, IMG_2432.jpeg)

>>1702479
Vagabond

No. 1702534

>>1702510
yeah to shield them from moids, not other women. Genuinely what a retarded take.

No. 1702535

>>1700887
>called out for "propaganda imaginery"
lol. lmao, even

No. 1702537

File: 1695199230617.jpeg (671.6 KB, 1310x1801, IMG_2434.jpeg)

>>1702479
Innocent

No. 1702612

>>1702510
You seem so have some serious trouble understanding that the rape and pedophilia comes from men and not women. Children are also protected mostly because of males. There aren't cases of serial child rapists who are women, there are almost no serial killers who are women, women don't harass men on busses or schools, the vast majority of pedophilia cases come from men.

No. 1702655

>>1702372
I don't have any gripes with procreate, but the ipad feels horrible to draw on. The heaviness of the pen, the glass screen (yes I know you can buy textured screen covers but that's an additional expense on top of an expensive tablet), the super small drawing area. It's just an ass drawing tablet for the price, it's a tablet that wasn't made for artists and it shows. Apple is great at marketing though.

No. 1702671

>>1701538
You should always have multiple references. You can outline photos the same way you outline over a model too.

No. 1702676

>>1702461
And its meticulously updated.

No. 1702687

>>1702372
Don't know why the procreate platoon decided to show up and get mad at you, but I agree. It's garbage, and even if you do turn up the smoothing on brushes, the bounciness of each lines feel clunky to work with for me. I much prefer Clip Studio Paint and Sai to Procreate. Somehow, I even prefer photoshop over it due to all the filtering you're able to do.
>>1702612
What does this have to do with thinking pedoshit is bad for either gender?

No. 1702727

>>1702687
>What does this have to do with thinking pedoshit is bad for either gender?
I was replying to the anon who kept saying that rape and child abuse in Japan happens because of women, and that's why it's bad for women to be into some kuroshitsuji type shit. The fact is that women aren't the ones committing 98% of violent crimes, and women who actually abuse children are extremely rare. You can think that it's still bad but that won't change the fact.

No. 1702731

>>1702687

They came outta the woodwork after I shared a sentiment on procreate and proceeded to come to its defense because I don't like it. Feels like twitter behavior, but I'm not going to entertain it any further than that.

has anyone here tried bluesky for art? i don't have one and I'm sick of moving from one shitty platform to another but i'm wondering if anyone has any experience with it so far.

No. 1702740

File: 1695231140579.png (242.23 KB, 668x917, bgfdgdf.png)

the new lol character literally a restrained girl. what the fuck. of course, people are already drawing her lewd and shit.

No. 1702746

>>1702740
The idea could make for a cool horror-themed character but the design they gave her is just coomer material

No. 1702749

>>1702487
What manga is this nona?

No. 1702750

>>1702740
I actually like the idea of a restrained monster girl.
But it's not what she is. They went 200% coomer bait with her. She is a 1000 years old vampire underage loli who walks by swaying her butt, moves by showing her feet, and has a cringe "uwu" personality. I really dislike her because she's wasted potential.

No. 1702754

>>1702537
The climber has a better art style despite being an older work for some reason.

No. 1702756

File: 1695232634653.jpg (334.28 KB, 1000x1421, MADK.jpg)


No. 1702760

>>1702750
This. The pose and face they chose for her tells it all.
They could have made her a guy but men wouldn't be interested in that

No. 1702814

her other drawings look ok, but in this one you can really see how everything crumbles apart from lack of fundamentals. rendermaxxing at its finest

No. 1702852

File: 1695242914493.jpeg (241.14 KB, 2048x2048, 73759393-5E57-479B-9E13-CFBBB2…)

>>1702754
Maybe cause it’s made 100% digitally now? Stuff like that can make some art look stiff in my opinion

No. 1702853

>>1702814
This shit has 2M views? Lol

No. 1702862

File: 1695243822366.jpg (355.73 KB, 1440x1280, 20092023060147.jpg)

>>1702853
It's a yt short, of course it has 2M views. Pic rel are their most viewed shorts vs their most viewed videos.

No. 1702864

>>1702740
Why tf is she barefoot, all the official images of her have some focus on her feet or toes. Shes got long monster claws on her fingers but not her toes? Cowards. She’s so painfully generic even has fucking booty shorts, besides the pillory thing but even that has no cool thought into it it’s just a boring edgy design that comes off more coomerish than monsterish.

No. 1702878

>>1702852
Fair point. But I wasn't talking about the stiffness specifically, more so the character designs and anatomy. Ths climber looks very realistic and has amazing detail, while innocent and everything after it looks animu but with some realism ans detail here and there.

No. 1702879

File: 1695245511321.png (447.12 KB, 1500x1070, kotteri chronicles of seven ci…)

>>1702479
I think the best example of Eastern and western comic inking styles mixing is kotteri

No. 1702991

wow is this thread is almost exclusively gonna be about fucking boring fetish infighting now(/ot/ rule 7)

No. 1703273

File: 1695284119087.jpg (250.63 KB, 749x1073, 1e4bcd74fd5c2e5d5917b9e7e34bd9…)

>>1702479
It's a little scrotey but Ran to Haiiro no Sekai.

No. 1703278

File: 1695284813367.png (196.23 KB, 1024x1473, img000021.png)

>>1702479
shoujo nemu

No. 1703308

>>1703273
>a little scrotey
The MC is a 10 year old turning into a grown up version of herself through magic and the way her brother and her old ass neighbor act whenever they see her rubbed me the wrong way. The art is very beautiful but I couldn't make it past the third chapter. Does it ever get better?

No. 1703320

>>1703308
Arguable. Major spoilers for the story The doctor moid becomes the big bad and dies but the japanese fans and maybe the author has such a soft spot for him because he keeps getting drawn in romantic AUs with the girl kek.

No. 1703325

>>1703320
Also despite sexualizing a still underage girl (not referring to the child version, she's like 14 or 16 when she transforms age) the story focuses on her actual growth as a human being depending less on magic. It's a good story, would be better without the weird fan service, kek.

No. 1703365

>>1702487
What manga? Looks cute

No. 1703682

>>1703325
is it mahou shojo? that trope is very, very old. Reminds me of creamy mami and its copies.

No. 1703689

File: 1695336504755.jpg (353.39 KB, 799x1200, FAAUYIGVIAELutH.jpg)

>>1702749
>>1703365
it's by ohishi masaru, sadly his manga doesnt seem to be translated anywhere

No. 1703759

File: 1695340563818.jpeg (1003.71 KB, 1170x1782, IMG_9148.jpeg)

The wildly different arms are sending me. I hope the commissioner gets a refund kekw.

No. 1703784

>>1703759
how the fuck do people paint so well and suck so much ass at anatomy? where the fuck do i learn how to rendermaxx

No. 1703795

File: 1695342329863.jpg (136.62 KB, 728x1047, 31728_vol1-chapter-1-when-we-d…)

>>1703278
This is cute ty

No. 1703823

>>1703784
That's not good painting. It's airbrush shading and dodge burn over flat colors with a shit ton of filters and effects. Look at it for more than a second and any appeal it may have had crumbles. The arms look like they're made of clay and the legs turn into a quirky lemon slice to hide the artist's inability to draw legs. The hat isn't even on her head the right way.

No. 1703838

>>1703823
It's still pretty in my opinion, and hides the imperfections pretty well

No. 1703847

File: 1695345548142.jpg (155.44 KB, 728x1037, 31728_vol1-chapter-102-comment…)

>>1703278
Anon.. how could you do this.

No. 1703855

>>1701839
Did the alligator bite off his penis or is thr blob female? I’m confused
>>1702092
I didn’t know she left the internet. Her work was a cool interpretation of Native Americans and I remember some actual natives stuck up for her.
>>1702408
You can import Photoshop brushes to Procreate anon
>>1702487
What are Western inking techniques compared to Eastern? I don’t ink but the mage manga you posted has been a fun read. Watching her ink traditionally makes me jealous.

No. 1704049

>>1702092
I'm still mad this artist got run off. By some bitch who would appear on an aryan propaganda poster too oh come ON, we can't ever have cool native art without the "my great grandma was a cherokee princess and this offends me!" people chiming in. So many natives actively praised the art style but of course every minority who disagrees with a twittertard is a token or something

No. 1704144

>>1703847
I was thinking the same thing when I reached that page. Truly a tragedy.

No. 1704149

File: 1695358628711.jpg (117.13 KB, 728x1047, 31728_vol1-chapter-5-a-special…)

>>1704144
Mfw when

No. 1704177

>>1703784
I'm not an artist but I tried drawing something today on ibispaint and all it takes to make it look decent is using the correct brushes and blending modes (burn, overlay, multiply etc.)

No. 1704192

>>1703759
That's just an abuse of "add" blending mode

No. 1704218

>>1703682
It's not but I felt that in spirit. Being a fan of fancy lala myself! It's very whimsical.

No. 1704275

>>1704177
Awww nonna please stop using burn and add layers right now, that hurt to read

No. 1704324

>>1704177
You know, I just got ibispaint for my phone, and it's so much easier than a non-screen tablet. Between that hand-eye coordination game and lousy brush settings I pinned the reason my art previously looked bad (line quality was crap and squiggly.) I notice eastern artists like using layers on blending modes to paint, whereas western artists are more prone to painting manually on one layer.

No. 1704441

>>1703784
tbh half this image looks like free downloaded brushes from Clip Studio (the prism effects, water effects). you could start there lol

No. 1704444

>>1703784
Use backlighting. Super easy: drop in a layer of shadow color on a multiply, linear burn, or darken layer. Then erase the edges for the light. It doesn't matter how crappy your drawing is, if you shade with backlighting, it'll look cool. Add light bloom on top for extra coolness. Rendermaxing is all about making light look really bright, and you can't do that without darks. Most people are afraid to shade with really dark colors.

No. 1704456

>>1703759
How do people lack so much quality control when it comes to commissions? The general style isn’t really for me but I can see why people would like it, but not fixing the character’s right arm/hand feels so inexcusable with how jarring the difference is. I’d be embarrassed to present this to someone who paid me.

No. 1704523


No. 1704791

>>1703759 reminded me of picrel. Does copy and pasting a glitter texture and adding another layer for effects really takes you 3 hours?

No. 1704793

File: 1695435909727.png (561.3 KB, 576x770, Screenshot_20230922-232145~2.p…)

>>1704791
Samefag I forgot the picture kek

No. 1704801

>>1704275
I don't actually use them, I just listed them as examples lol. But I do use them when I'm working on an already existing drawing that I want to change the colors of.

No. 1704815

>>1704793
this looks good. what am i suppose to hate about this?

No. 1704850

>>1704815
No one told you to hate it, just that it's funny minimal changes were made despite it claiming it took another 3 hours to make left look like right

No. 1704883

>>1704850
NTA, but I don't think you understand how long rendering takes. Not to mention just base lines and colors with minimal shading or anything took her 45 minutes. She works slow from the looks of it. Artists usually do these side-by-sides anyway as a way to help themselves keep track of speed progress and share it.

No. 1704886

>>1704883
Still funny

No. 1704967

>>1704850
those don't look like minimal changes, looks like the artist put actual effort into the reflection of the dress

No. 1704968

does accuracy training actually work? it seems a bit insane, but i have seen many pro asian artists shill it

No. 1705186

>>1704968
tldw but it looks like he's doing some basic observation drawing exercises. What's insane about it?

No. 1705191

>>1704886
It's not funny when you're the one who can't grasp basic art and no one agrees with you.

No. 1705274

>>1704968
Yes, but it's not just an asian artist thing. I'd recommend picking up a book on observational drawing. There's this technique that he's doing where you find the negative space and basic shapes to map out the drawing. You measure the length between shapes (or things like eye, nose, etc.) and that will help you make sure everything is proportional.

No. 1705317

>>1705191
Yes it is. People don't have to agree with you always.

No. 1705441

>>1704968
You mean sight size or working from bargue plates? Those are classical atelier methods and I’d say yes they work.

No. 1705626

Thoughts on the dollightfull video? I think she's a little bit rusty, and the paint job incident is a bit sad. Especially considering that it was sooo preventable kek but overall the doll looked nice in the end imo

No. 1705632

>>1705626
her designs don't appeal to me and her high pitched fake voice is obnoxious. there's a lot more talented doll creators than her.

No. 1705659

>>1705626
Saged for slightly off topic but my goodness they destroyed Cleo de nile. One of her legs is supposed to have mummy-like bandages but instead it looks like self harm scars. I still wonder who thought it was a good idea the new designs of mh

No. 1705706

>>1705626
Looking at a lot of Dollightful's dolls you can visibly see the paint strokes used to change the skin tones. It's so thick and uneven and the nails she makes always look like garbage. She is pretty good at doll clothes, too bad she doesn't just focus on that. I really like Poppen Altelier personally because she's just a sweet lady making doll customizations and selling them with the help of her mother who makes the clothes sometimes. I think her mother is a professional seamstress? I also like Poppen because her doll customizations are so varied, I thought she did an amazing job with this one.

No. 1705786

>>1705626
I like her

No. 1705787

File: 1695524510946.jpeg (1.07 MB, 1170x1843, IMG_5189.jpeg)

Drawing an irl teenage girl as an instagram baddie is so bleak

No. 1705791

>>1705626
I haven't liked any of her recent videos. Shes really dropped off lately. Shes pandering to her fans super bad now, and none of her customs seem truly authentic. Like she just wants to make something to get views.

No. 1705807

>>1705787
I have no idea who the girl is but the drawing doesn't even look like the reference.

No. 1705812

>>1705787
I have become so desensitized to this art style. Everything looks the same. Its just people copying off eachother in an endless loop.

No. 1705814

>>1705626
i liked it, dollightfull is the only doll ooak creator i like, the rest are always making drag queen looking dolls or chasing trends instead of making their own characters

No. 1705831

>>1705626
her dolls are so rushed and sloppy as of late, whats the point in drawing concept art if you're going to slap unplanned & unfitting clothes on it half the time? she got me into ooaks but now I watch better artists like catmeleon

No. 1705848

>>1705626
I really used to like her pokemon series and in particular charlotte copperchain. I haven't watched in years now though, mshe kind of fell off I don't know what happened. She's okay though compared to like the drag doll artists. She's not glaringly so-bad-it's-offensive or shitty, there's just some better more talented people to watch or follow on instagram. She's just kind of washed up and that's not a crime or anything. I think anons are okay if they like her.

No. 1705857

>>1705317
Explain why

No. 1705911

File: 1695540182411.jpg (270.9 KB, 1220x1714, [18-03-19] 975837465347964928_…)

Does anyone know of more artists that post their studies?
pic rel is by @Af_Cf_

No. 1705932

So Michie/Twisted Disaster made a new update video and as per usual, she says some ridiculous shit and being melodramatic. I notice that in EVERY update/video she does, she always feels the need to talk about how something traumatic happened to her, how her previous year was "just awful" and waffle on taking forever to get to a point and thinking she's "uwu quirky" while doing it. One of the stupidest things she says in this video is her actually feeling the need to bitch and lecture her viewers that if you become a freelance artist, you can't quality for unemployment. No fucking shit, who the fuck actually believes that you would be able to get on unemployment as a freelance artist. She also calls herself a professional freelance artist and I have to wonder if "professional" is even accurate. The bitch takes forever to finish commission work that can span for year waits and while she does do artist alley at cons, I just have a hard time believing that she has swarms of people lining up to buy her derpy-tier looking merch. I just don't know if I would personally call her a "professional" but maybe I'm just being petty.

Another annoying thing she said in the video was how she said she doesn't like asking for things when it's like, I just don't believe that. I can believe that she probably doesn't like asking for things directly but I feel like she's one of those people who just tries to be boy when she wants something and tries to plant the seed in her much younger friend's heads.

On that note, I've been thinking that aside from Holly Brown, most of her friends are barely entering their 20s (and seem to mostly be troons), I can't help but feel that reflecting on her old video about toxic friendships where she mentioned that she realized her friends from school that she grew up with were all "toxic" and "horrible", I can't help but wonder if maybe she was the one projecting and that she can't handle being around people her age because they won't be as likely to be afraid to call her out on her lazy ways. That they won't tell her what she wants to hear and can even be blunt but to her, that just means they're being "mean".

It's just something I started to think more about after watching a few of her streams and hearing how her much younger friends treat her with this air of naivete and not being as blunt about things. Well with the exception of her TIF/Troon friend "Swayer" who clearly acts like an asshole in a pathetic ploy to come off more like a man. Anyway sorry for blogpost, I just find TD to be an enigma kek.

No. 1705933

>>1705932
>tries to be coy when she wants something
Sorry,typo

No. 1706025

File: 1695556362203.jpg (Spoiler Image,915.57 KB, 4096x3638, kisaniyav.JPG)

>one of tomatomagica’s recent artworks
I don’t get it, is this not a loli…? I guess I just assumed she’d hate this kind of stuff

No. 1706029

>>1706025
>fatfag
>vtuber
>furry
>weeb
genuinely what did you expect

No. 1706031

File: 1695557676967.png (1.78 MB, 1647x1717, small bean uwu.png)

>>1701684
Semi related but I can’t stand this artist. Her whole identity is just being a pickme, and built her entire following around being an internet shut-in’s dream gf. I honestly wonder if her bf emotionally abuses her, since all of her shit comes off as a massive cope + needing validation from other men.

No. 1706040

>>1706029
I mean I get it’s more obvious with her newer art kek, but I knew her for her pandering tumblr-era art and her hateboner for sailor moon (where she shat on it for showing teen girls naked during transformation and anime usagi’s relationship with a college guy), so I thought she’d be consistent with her basic standards despite the coombrain

No. 1706046

>>1706025
Wait THAT tomatomagica? The one that drew those cringy ass lovelive "redesigns"? What the fuck happened??

No. 1706056

>>1706031
i genuinely dont understand the point of pickmes, i am an ugly autistic retard and i have plenty of unwanted moid attention why would anyone willingly want to pander to them? they are all ugly and not worth it anyways.

No. 1706057

File: 1695561211776.png (692.98 KB, 1280x1060, 92bf668a3b5e210286784e49fc7c37…)

>>1706046
WAIT this is her old art?! holy shit i have hope then, kek. Interesting how she went from tumblirina steven universe disney mix to something that could easily pass as the art of some professional japanese illustrator. I wonder how it happened, her old art is so…western…looking.

No. 1706059

>>1706056
internalized misogyny

(forgot to sage)

No. 1706074

File: 1695563841108.png (10.31 KB, 505x211, scott.png)

>>1706031
>>1706056
I can fix her.
Also, ironically, women eat this shit up too. Yes pic rel is a meme. But it just shows how huge the couple market is for pickmeish #relatable content.

No. 1706076

File: 1695563920103.png (5.47 KB, 600x161, think-with-forms-6-lines-2-2-7…)

How can I improve at form drawing and perspective? I'm doing these exercises where I do crossectional drawings of simple household objects and I'm really struggling with them, I never know how wide the circles should be

No. 1706082

File: 1695565396085.jpg (316.92 KB, 2200x2933, design-your-own-mug-1116513_l.…)

>>1706076
like here. how do I know what the size of the base should be? or is it a matter of just practicing until you get a sense for it?

No. 1706108

>>1706082
>is it a matter of just practicing until you get a sense for it?
Unfortunately yes. When you're drawing and applying these guidelines it's not just about what you see but also what you can assume or know. In your example you can't see the entire base, so you will have to go off of a size that would make sense with the upper part. You already know it's a circle in perspective and that it's similar in size to the upper one so that's what you have to draw

No. 1706257

>>1706031
Pickmes with boyfriends are even sadder to me because clearly being picked is not enough

No. 1706298

>>1706257
at that point wouldn't that just be an attention whore?

No. 1706370

File: 1695588152124.jpg (238.62 KB, 750x712, comic.jpg)

>>1706031
>>1706257
Total tinfoil but I keep wondering if the boyfriend is real or just a character she made up to build her comics around, since that’s basically her entire online brand. She’s posted photos of herself, but never anything with him. I get exaggerating some moments for humor/clout, but sometimes I just can’t believe stuff like picrel lol

No. 1706373

>>1706370
She posted a pic of shadow silhoute of her and her boyfriend before. Some anon here claimed that she was able to find a pic of her boyfriend through investigating on instagram but she never posted.

No. 1706448

>>1706370
The boyfriend is probably just ugly or painfully average so doing a face reveal would ruin "the pretty anime boy who loves you" appeal of this content. That said, this dialogue sounds ai generated.

No. 1706464

Best website to sell physical art products Nonnas? Using Etsy is a struggle since everything on there is buried in Amazon crap now. Tia

No. 1706473

>>1706040
I think this has happened with a lot of artists because mainstream internet has become so much more coomer-oriented. It’s sad.

No. 1706510

>>1706464
Plus I'm sure with places like etsy, seller fees don't help. You could make your own site, though you'd have to handle all the marketing yourself.

No. 1706535

I want to start seriously learning how to draw to make art of cute and hot men but 1) I feel ashamed to try especially since I'm still a beginner artist and 2) I don't know where I'd get good reference images. Nonnas who are masters as objectifying men and/or shamelessly horny how do I reach your level? I'd prefer to draw softcore art but would probably learn how to draw dicks well eventually.

No. 1706552

>>1706535
I love drawing hot demon guys. A good source to practice is michael stokes' photos. Watch out if you venture too far you'll eventually find NSFW but on the surface it's just suggestive muscular men, 11/10.
Have fun with your journey nona

No. 1706617

File: 1695614347586.png (1.28 MB, 1184x1134, Screenshot 2023-09-24 at 10.58…)

delusion

No. 1706642

>>1706535
gay porn

No. 1706645

I really am so burnt out from looking at all the same shit all of the time. Everyone tries to monetize it as well, there's nothing wrong with making bad art but thinking you're going to get famous off of bad art that you only ever copy off of other people who actually have any semblance of originality is tiring. I find myself going back to a lot of rudimentary Japanese artists, I'm not a weeb but at least it always evokes something sweet or calming. Im getting really bored with looking at the same stupid thing over and over without end.

No. 1706670

>>1706031
It’s just really fucking weird how pickmes like this will draw porn of themselves and constantly reference how much they look like little kids (who soooo don’t like it at all omg)

No. 1706676

>>1706617
Even if I thought this, I wouldn't post it lmao.

No. 1706708

>>1706464
have you considered opening an instagram shop? Mine does pretty well, tho you have to do your own marketing.

No. 1706961

>>1706552
interesting, guess i'll be drawing amputee porn with this then
>>1706642
thank you although i really do not want to see the buttsecks if i can avoid it

No. 1706979

>>1706961
Found this croquis channel that's focused on male poses, hope it helps nonny.

No. 1707057

>>1706979
this is very helpful, thank you so much!

No. 1707127

File: 1695661612454.jpeg (164.51 KB, 941x706, D69BB13C-12E9-4213-B50E-F71917…)

>>1705911
I rly like following @pikatstudies! Even tho she’s a programmer at Riot! she still takes art classes and continues to build her portfolio thru her studies.

No. 1707157

How do you manage promoting art and making it? I hate being the retweet and follow!!! type of artist I don't like pumping art to have followers and I have some art accounts(fandom alts) which are popular but I hate getting the engagementgendies I just want to post art let people enjoy it and piss off not keep promoting it and being engaged with very dm I get. I feel like someone like me wasn't made out to be the content creator type..how do you all nonnies manage being a pr manager and a artist?

No. 1707166

>>1706370
Ot but this is so pathetic and narcissistic oh my god, how can people be into this trash?

No. 1707170

>>1707166
Yet people are drooling over it in games like BG3 when NPCs do it. It just seems like romanticizing self-fic. Self-instering isn't really new, look at Twilight. Not really sure where the narcissistic part comes in when that's the intention. Art involving yourself doesn't make someone a narc, either.

No. 1707187

>>1707127
i always though pika was a tranny

No. 1707198

I am struggling to ''draw for fun''. I can sit and grind for hours but once I try to sit and draw for myself I struggle not knowing what to draw, I cant come up with poses or anything interesting to draw, any tips?

No. 1707231

>>1707170
My bad, should've clarified what I meant by narcissistic. It's not the art itself but wanting someone to say bullshit like that to her because she wants it to be a reality that someone would dedicate their lives 100% to her. I know man bad but I think that line of thinking is retarded regardless of gender. But tbh I do find self-inserting weird, too.

No. 1707237

>>1707198
I've been struggling with this too nonna. Honestly, if you have more fun grinding or doing studies, try concept art work. It's really fun if you take different things you want to study (like an animal, an article of clothing, or a model/person) and combine these ideas into one. You can try and use your imagination to come up with a design. It's also been helping me a ton by making up my own story and trying to draw scenes from it. Approach it little by little. If you want to study characters one day, come up with character designs that day. If you want to study environments, come up with environments that tell part of your story.

No. 1707352

File: 1695680123162.jpg (51.01 KB, 623x287, 20230925_160648.jpg)

Luxesbytes/vani is at it again but this time on bluesky. What a fucking idiot.

Did she think that because it's invite only she could dump her twitter and leave like nothing happened?

>calls herself kid.

>is in her mid 30s, nearly 40 kek

No. 1707354

I don’t really think it’s assholeish for an artist to not tell someone who their manufacturer for an item is, but apparently it is according to annoying zoomies. I don’t even care the reason for gatekeeping, I just like seeing people having fits and leaving 20 comments because they can’t do even simple google searches on their own, which is the minimum amount you will do if you’re actually serious about having charms or plushes made or whatever.

No. 1707382

File: 1695681754564.jpg (257.1 KB, 1500x1125, IMG-20200202-195112.jpg)

I love his art. I still have a beat up little book of his that I got when I was 13 and treasured so much

No. 1707385

>>1706670
Every time I see an artist claim she looks super young and gets confused for a kid, it's only because of their height and the way they dress so older adults can't tell. They never actually look younger than their age, idk why they try to do that so often.

No. 1707406

>>1707352

Anyone know her alts? I heard she got like 2 or 3

No. 1707437

>>1707187
lol what gave you that impression? Her twitters and twitch are free of gendered stuff as far as im aware and always seemed female presenting to me

No. 1707718

>>1707198
It's a lot easier to be creative within a frame, so give yourself a more narrow frame to work within. Instead of having a vague idea like "maybe I'll draw a summery girl" you make up specifics like "a blonde girl in a long dress eating ice cream while leaning up against her bicycle".
If that's also too hard to come up with, take a photo or artwork you like and make something derivative of it. Copy the pose or vibe but imagine it in a different context and outfit that you like better. Drawing "for yourself" doesn't have to mean "100% from my own brain" it could just mean making cute fanart of something you like.

No. 1707881

File: 1695734536767.jpg (141.88 KB, 1250x423, FDJyWirVgAAEa0U.jpeg.jpg)

Have you nonas seen the recent discussions on twitter about this weird webcomic called Sinfest? It's drawn by a man and used to be a daily comedic strip until he discovered terf talking points, which lead to its downfall according to prior fans of it. It seems like an insane rabbithole to go into, all the panels that I've seen shared don't resemble anything like a plot kek

No. 1707883

>>1707881
It has terf talking points but mostly the poster "white right wing" with super religious undertones. It's odd, is the author even white himself?

No. 1707884

>>1707883
Yeah I saw it on Twitter too. You should post some of the funnier panels lol. He has a lot of weird shit about alien immigrants too and seems obsessed with them. His panels about immigrants are so bizarre that it almost feels like satire especially the one with the crying alien kid.

No. 1707889

>>1707883
>>1707884
isn't he Japanese-American

No. 1707900

>>1707889
He considers himself a good immugrant and divides immigrants into 2 categories : bad immigrants who are drawn as aliens or some weird apocalyptic insect-robots and the good ones such as superman and that DragonBalls goku guy.

No. 1707909

File: 1695738645960.png (95.02 KB, 740x250, FNWOlrtVgAkBuot.png)

>>1707883
Right, it seems to me like he went from radfem points into alt-right shit and I haven't seen enough to get a feeling for what is going on in his brain and if he's even thinking about the real world or just too terminally online and wrapped up in delusions. It's also interesting how this comic has changed, in the beginning it was very different

No. 1707912

File: 1695738880674.jpg (48.58 KB, 650x265, F6iZXpvWYAACI0T.jpeg.jpg)

>>1707909
Random old comic I saw. Apparently these are the MCs but I don't really care to read more about it kek

No. 1707913

File: 1695738923654.png (809.42 KB, 941x600, 1693494196306.png)

>>1707881
>>1707889
>>1707909
While he's an extreme case, he's not unheard of. A lot of formerly left-leaning people switching to the populist right after the mainstream liberal gaslighting regarding addressing troon issues. Their logic being, "if they're being dishonest about this issue, then they are likely lying about everything." A lot of radfems and socialist in general are falling down this pipeline as well, I'm talking about life long communists praising Tucker Calrson. for e.g Kajsa Ekman (who wrote an excellent book regarding the state of prostitution and how it functions in Europe), but at the same time, she retweets and posts literal Russian propaganda and thinks Putin is justified in invading Ukraine.

No. 1707916

>>1707913
The war in Ukraine has caused some Europeans to be left leaning economically but right socially. Just because she supports Putin doesn’t mean she isn’t a communist, she just hates NATO

No. 1707921

>>1707881
Damn, I remember Sinfest before the author went down the radfem rabbithole. It was mostly just silly gag a day shit and was alright but I never really followed it. Then one day he started a whole plot about how the patriarchy is like the Matrix. That's when his fans turned on him. It also pretty much consumed every aspect of the comic and he started doing overarching plots and increasing the scope two fold, completely abandoning any semblance of humor or lightheartedness.

Really reminds me of an Dave Sim in a way considering both fell into radical rabbit holes (but Sim went the opposite route) and both are what I'd consider quite talented artists.

No. 1707956

File: 1695745028069.jpg (191.33 KB, 697x1280, comic1.jpg)

I think the Sinfest comics have been really on point.

No. 1707957

File: 1695745062966.jpg (125.49 KB, 1250x423, comic2.jpg)


No. 1707967

File: 1695746370094.jpg (146.06 KB, 1250x423, 2023-09-08.jpg)

This one is good also.

No. 1707970

File: 1695746553654.jpg (157.61 KB, 1250x423, 2023-08-31.jpg)


No. 1707971

>>1707956
although some of his comics are batshit crazy i really like how he colors also frankly glad hes calling out what a plague troonism is

No. 1707973

File: 1695746984783.jpg (145.27 KB, 1250x423, 2023-08-14.jpg)

Forgot to include the best one based on that arrest of the autistic girl in the UK who told a police officer "You look like my lesbian grandma" and they dragged her out the house crying and screaming to put her in jail.

No. 1707982

>>1707957
Am I the only one tinfoiling he's female? I don't know if I'm just being pessimistic but I doubt moids will understand radfem talking points like surrogacy, pornography, pimps and johns as much as he does.

No. 1707987

>>1707970
This isn't what is happening in classrooms at all but those backpack alt-right nazi shit is. This is so retarded. No winder twitter loves it. Its now an alt-right safe haven.

No. 1707992

>>1707982
He's allegedly married to a feminist woman.

No. 1707994

>>1707992
fair enough, the other way I can see is a woman hassling her nigel about it, kek.

No. 1707996

>>1707992
>>1707994
Or more possible, she's writing the stories and he's just illustrating. Its possible he's also easily molded by his girlfriend.

No. 1708006

>>1707996
In this possibility, I hope and glad she's safe under his name but also I hope he'd stop pandering to reactionary anti-woke crowd.

No. 1708049

I wanna make some paintings of my friend's pets and I wanna know exactly what I need for it to not look like shit. I have painted before but I just used paint, canvas, and brush. Pretty simple but I wanted to know if I needed other stuff that I'm not aware of.

No. 1708132

>>1706025
Genuinely nauseating to look at. I remember her being groveling after that one call-out post circulated about her old incest and loli drawings, saying things along the lines of “I-I promise I’m not like that now! I was 13 I didn’t know any better and I was groomed!!” Those must have been crocodile tears because she is absolutely shameless about it now.

No. 1708140

>>1706031
The termianlly online pickmes who make being short their entire personality are often some of the most crusty looking bitches who are just under if not average height. They want to be uwu irl legal lolis so bad.

No. 1708148

Probably been asked a million times before but do you guys have any advice for a first-timer on how to get commissions? Is it just a matter of making good art, offering commissions, and just hoping someone notices and asks for one? Also, what payment processor do you use? I have a paypal account I made years ago so I might go with that since I’ve heard it’s what most people use, but I’m wondering if there’s better options. Also, kind of worried about revealing my identity and potentially running into tax problems so any tips about that would be great.

I’m thinking I might try to appeal to people who want their OCs drawn. For anyone here who gets commissions, what are you usually asked to draw?

No. 1708179

File: 1695767678390.png (26.09 KB, 580x213, 879264815654613656.png)

Artists are so entitled and whiny. This is why you are being replaced with AI lmao

No. 1708180

>>1707956
i dont get it did they steal the baby?

No. 1708188

>>1708179
??? Do they not give a deadline to the client? Do the clients buy without a deadline?

No. 1708203

>>1708148
A lot of it really is just posting your art and making it clear in your profile that commissions are open. And making a commission sheet to show people your pricing and what you're able to do/won't do. If you have art mutuals who can repost your commission sheet/art that helps attract new customers but it'll be a slow process at first until you build up an audience. I used to use PayPal and it was fine, but my commissions are a bit different as I make crafts/physical items versus illustrations so now I just take commissions over my own website/square. Again, a bit of a different beast for me but I get a lot of OCs and characters from video games/anime/etc. that people like. Good luck, nonna!

No. 1708215

>>1708148
Yeah, I've built my art presence on instagram, I don't have like 1k followers or anything, but I have a small circle of "regulars" who always like and comment on my stuff. I also engaged a lot with posting stories and talking to my followers a bit. I put myself out there and was able to get some commissioners, though I haven't been as active recently. Luckily, I did get that golden client where they can't draw themselves and want you to draw their OCs all the time kek. He's great. I did get commissioned by this scrote to draw nsfw, but it was a decent price too so worked out. He is incredibly patient as well. I hope you can find some clients nonna, especially dedicated, understanding ones. I use Paypal myself for payment. I have taken cashapp before kek

No. 1708270

File: 1695780175024.png (449.65 KB, 365x504, what.PNG)

There are so many mediocre artists out there with TONS of engagement, viewers, and followers…How the hell do people do it?

This artist has 15k+ followers…averages around 200 viewers on twitch every time she streams…and this art got 11k likes.

How do I reach this level of engagement?? I'm so bitter

No. 1708272

>>1708270
keep posting as much as you can. social media has turned art into a commodity so much as so that even the process is becoming a commodity (through tiktok).
its not for everyone so pace yourself accordingly, nonna

No. 1708376

>>1708179
I've done several commissions and I don't get this mindset from artists at all. If I took a whole month to finish a piece I'd be embarrassed as fuck for being so slow. If it's your primary income I get that you may need to secure clients beforehand, but then you should be extremely clear with when their timeslot is and when they can expect the work. Unless the art actually takes a whole month to finish because it's so detailed, but if it's just a "life gets in the way" kind of thing you're just being a dick. If you want people to take art as a serious job then treat it like a serious job and not a hobby you do here and there when you feel like it.

No. 1708397

>>1708270
Sell your soul and draw things that are popular, flavor of the month trends and popular ships.

No. 1708411

>>1708397
Exactly. It's a nice looking drawing of a fire emblem character in a wedding dress, I think there has to be some luck involved but it's clear why that would blow up on a site like twitter. The original tweet from march 2022 even got 21k likes. That artist is also a Vtuber, so the amount of viewers that anon mentioned makes sense to me since it's not just silent drawing but somewhat engaging content. Interestingly her insta and tumblr seem to be pretty small in comparison, I guess the twitter/twitch audience just doesn't care much about the quality of art beyond seeing their own waifus in whatever way

No. 1708442

>>1708270
I also have noticed these kind of people engage with the comunity A LOT and try to make as many friends as they can/join servers. Since most people in these groups feel a bit pressured to share the art since it was many by a friend, it breaches out quickly.
I recently started a Twitter (yeah, I know) and often see outright bad artists get +100 rts on their stuff and it's all because they became friends mostly with people who have +4k followers

No. 1708524

>>1708376
Usually the people bitching about clients pestering them for faster progress than 12 months are the kind of e-beggars masquerading as "artists" who sell shitty $30 emergency commissions with a sob story to pay rent (which they spend on new shiny fandom merch) but then ditch the commissions due to "mental stress" after getting the money. And since the amount of money spent is relatively small the client eventually gives up rather than attempts to fight it. It's a very common hustle. Actual professionals making real money with commissions (think $200+ per piece) know what's at stake and don't try to pull a fast one.

The original anon going "THIS IS WHY AI IS REPLACING YOU!!!" is a retarded cryptobro refugee though and shouldn't be interacted with

No. 1708526

>>1707881
>this weird webcomic called Sinfest
Man it hurts to realize you've been around long enough to remember when Sinfest made the shift from an iconic 4-panel gag comic with risque humor known by literally everyone online into the feminist format and faded into obscurity. It was a huge uproar in the online artist circles back then and it feels weird to realize it was more than a decade ago iirc.

I think the initial feminist narrative was pretty good and he reflected on women and our struggles pretty adequately for being a man, to the point I even wondered if the strip was being ghostwritten by a radfem girlfriend or something, but then he started slipping again towards the antivaxx conservatoid deep end and made the comic just a less white supremacist version of Stonetoss. Which honestly reflects what happened to a lot of online gendercrit spaces. His art is still amazing though.

>>1707913
Yeah, it's grim. At least I've seen some ex-altrighters openly reject their ideas and apologize for falling into the pipeline as vulnerable teenagers so I guess you lose some and you gain some.

No. 1708537

>>1707913
You weren't lying. He is batshit crazy. All his recent comics are about the great replacement and international Jewish conspiracy, far-right conspiracy theories. He makes as much sense as transgenderism.

No. 1708608

File: 1695828888272.jpg (147.28 KB, 1250x423, 2023-08-19.jpg)

>>1708537
Jesus christ the last time I read Sinfest it was still just about how prostitution and sex work dehumanizes women and now he's deadass drawing unironic comics about the great replacement conspiracy, anti-Ukraine and climate change denialist shit. What a waste of talent. His art is so good and he has great storytelling skills and they're spent on this. What the hell happened?

No. 1708611

>>1708608
He's not wrong tho.

No. 1708675

>>1708180
His comics now follow a short storyline. OP posted the follow-up with the two gay men. She was a surrogate for them and realized too late she wanted the baby while the gay men disregarded her as soon as her job was done.

No. 1708686

>>1708270
Is that byleth from fire emblem in a wedding dress? Making content of waifus is an easy way to get following, if a bit mindless if you yourself don't like it

No. 1708721

>>1708611
I think you're on the wrong site

No. 1708943

File: 1695857649545.png (2.31 MB, 2804x1903, image.png)

>makes the most basic furry design you can imagine
> Do not color pick
> Do not reference
> There will be consequences

Why are furfags like this?

No. 1708969

>>1708943
Every time I see big, obnoxious watermarks on generic OC art I get the urge to make a collage of identical characters. The fuck are they going to do? Send the dog police after me?

No. 1709009

>>1700596
shotafag? kill yourself(a-logging)

No. 1709022

>>1708969
Do it kek. Especially if the artists are cows who will screech bloody thief at other characters that resemble a facsimile of theirs.

No. 1709024

>>1708943
The face looks like random blob of brown colors from afar due to the design and low contrast I need to zoom in and turn on my brightness to discern it properly

No. 1709066

>>1709024
Right at first my brain tried to see this as a horse not a dog, with the right ear being the horse's snout

No. 1709081

Nonnies who have ipads for drawing, what kind did you get? Like what size, storage, price, etc. Did you get an older model or shell out for something newer? Did you buy new or used? I’m a poorfag so getting a used/refurbished one is tempting… I’ve never had an ipad before though so I’m not sure what kind to get that would be best for drawing. (I do have a small screenless drawing tablet but I wonder if I’d do more digital art with something more convenient.)

No. 1709122

>>1709081
I have a 2nd generation ipad pro. It still holds up really well and I haven’t really had a desire to upgrade from it.

No. 1709149

>>1709081
I have one of the new iPad Pro's, with a 12.9" screen. I think given the choice you should go for the same size as me, it's decently big that it never really feels too small. I think if I'd got the smaller one, I'd feel like it's just slightly too small. I use Procreate and it's freaking awesome. It also records your process passively so you always have a timelapse you can export, I think it's nice if you post your art on social media or just think it looks cool to see it sped up.

No. 1709162

Hey did any of you watch this. It pissed me off so bad that I thought about overweight Twitter trannies dying. But I know they still exist. So my day is just ruined now

No. 1709167

File: 1695891876544.png (329.97 KB, 680x536, 1690982730692.png)

>>1709162
> I thought about overweight Twitter trannies dying
why not all? popular twitter art troons either turn out to be diapurfurs or pedos puppychan

No. 1709192

File: 1695895148003.jpg (525.08 KB, 1080x1080, quicksquarenew_202392817551823…)

Every now and again this artist goes on some angry rant about other artists stealing her outfit designs or copying her art. But then recently she's even said that crediting her for style inspiration isn't "classy"? I've never heard of an artist getting pissed that someone credited them as an inspiration lol

No. 1709197

>>1708943
furries are something else
>be furfag into inflation
>commission some dude to make you an inflation suit
>dude fucks up the patterns of the suit
>he resells it and the furfag commissions him again
>fuck it up for the second time
>resell it again
>furfaggot gets angry because there are now two similar inflation latex suits with the same generic blue/red/white color combo

No. 1709203

File: 1695896091714.webm (495.34 KB, 720x720, JDGE.webm)

>>1709162
why are all popular wester twitter artists so fucking bad at art? i dont wanna start an east vs west debate, i know there are tons of talented western artists, but the popular ones are always so terrible at art compared to japanese artists who have less followers but are miles more talented.

No. 1709204

File: 1695896447819.png (77.29 KB, 618x390, Capture.PNG)

>>1709167
Really it's not just troons. It's mostly just bored fat teenage girls online.
I'm thinking of what this anon >>1700944 said:
>Why is it always women that draw content targeted toward women being called out and targeted?
Because it's mostly chronically online teen girls starting drama over fucking nothing, which is really a shame. Do you think a single one of those South Park profile picture accounts are run by someone with a penis? They're not even trannies. Well a lot of them are, but they're TIF/fakeboi/ftms.
People really need to stop giving a shit about what kpop stans and other worthless retards say on Twitter. Stop giving weight to it, these people haven't even graduated high school. I feel like all the YouTube drama channels that have cropped up since the mid 2010s are really contributing toward letting those types get their way because they include screencaps and sentiments regurgitated by them. They have no soul and parasitize everything.
They are vile, worthless people. And before you say "they're just teenagers" I would not have done what they do online as a teenager, and none of my friends would have. They are not going to "grow out of it". They never do. All these nasty Twitter ftm 15 year olds are going to either get really fat and move from place to place in hovels with other trannies for the rest of their lives while e-begging, or kill themselves. They will never contribute anything valuable to the world. Why are so many teens furries now? Fuck Gen Xers and Millennials for giving their kids unrestricted internet access

No. 1709205

File: 1695896571145.jpg (147.07 KB, 894x894, 81SDj lZaJL._AC_UF894,1000_QL8…)

What's your opinion on Ohuhu markers? I own about 50 copics and I love them but I'm thinking getting some Ohuhu ones for practice drawings.

No. 1709206

>>1709192
Full offense to that woman, but her art is not unique at all. Unless someone was tracing exactly, her drawings are so Tumblr genetic that I wouldn't be able to tell her apart from other random artists.

No. 1709210

>>1709162
Such an insane situation. There are two streams with or about Chippledipple on his second channel, TomDark. I found them to be kind of interesting, in one of them he "debates" some guy who made a video saying Tom was spreading misinfo about the situation but when pressed he immediately folds and starts saying he was tired and didn't really think about it and says he's sorry kek twitter is just full of braindead people that say things without considering consequences because they never experience any. They don't live in the real world, they have no idea what the shit they are saying actually means and most of the time they don't even care if something they are complaining about really happend. Every so often I see callouts and then someone asks "What did they do? Where's the proof?" and no one answers but the accusation itself, even though it's baseless, is already heavy enough to force an apology

No. 1709213

>>1709203
i mean its goes both ways you also find some godawful art in the east thats popular too, most Popular western artist never improve? theyre stuck making the same suldge theyve making since it gets them follows i mean look at cyraine and ross fundamentally sure the illustration looks good but you cant get past the holier than thou attitude they have(aka kooleen) these artists cant understand that what may be good for them wont be for others look at naoki hes in the same sphere but he never changes the artstyle of the pieces he gets just corrects them to look good

No. 1709217

>>1708270
I know this is the salt thread but the art is fine. It's nothing amazing, but the general composition and colours are pleasant, and 15k followers really isn't that much.

No. 1709220

>>1709210
everyone involved its such an insufferable talentless faggot, but at least it's funny as an outsider

No. 1709221

>>1709192
Must stem from insecurity because her art is generic as fuck and she knows it

No. 1709225

>>1709162
Which part pissed you off nonnie? I was unaware of this drama and I just watched. Fractal county was such a douche and the misogynistic wojack shit was disgusting, but kek at him laughing at a fat fetish tranny.

No. 1709253

>>1709220
Kek that's true, I was surprised I hadn't heard anything about this or puppychan on here. It seems like those were two bigger situations in the community

>>1709203
Western artists oftentimes get popular for their personality or looks, not only the actual art. It's also just a completely different environment with very different influences, so the art that's made looks different. I'm kind of jealous of weebs and anyone who grew up with anime because their art started out as at least somewhat appealing while I was trying to imitate ugly ass tumblr and deviantart slop because I just didn't know anything else and as a kid I couldn't tell how bad it was

No. 1709263

>>1709205
they're good.

No. 1709357

>>1709203
Honestly I noticed the average western artist blows up because of memes, not much else (maybe coom and yet memes still top it). In every fandom I've been in you have very talented western artists with 1-5k and then people who post shitty but consistent doodles with the meme of the day/week with 30k or more.

I don't see this happening with asian communities, first of all they don't seem to care as much about meme shit. Secondly they have a lot more patience when it comes to letting artists create. In the west if you're not grinding daily (which implies lower quality art) I've found that people get bored and constantly unfollow. Meanwhile my japanese followers will follow me for years and still interact even when I completely changed the subject matter of what I post kek.

It's not that western artists are shittier, it's that the western audience is shittier. Plus it makes our artists less motivated to try or improve when they can shit out Reimu drinking grimace shake in a white void in mspaint and get 50k likes.

No. 1709447

>>1709205
Draw with jazza has a video comparing them with copics if you haven't seen that/got your question after watching that

No. 1709454

File: 1695917709495.jpg (135.21 KB, 953x1012, 1624713594938.jpg)

>>1709357
> Secondly they have a lot more patience when it comes to letting artists create
nayrt but my mind is always blown by the level of detail and patience of most jap artists, these people will spend 8h MINIMUM on a single piece and take care of the tiniest details, it's really something to think about.
Whereas most western artists that blow up that you talk about, their art is so subpar it would be an offense to even compare them to a jap artist.
And I say this as someone who's been on pixiv for 15 years, in Japan being able to draw is something that is considered normal.
Given how much the west's artists and people in general have their dopamine receptors fried because of social media, seeing artists who really pour in effort to their work gives me hope
But those who get bored and unfollow aren't a loss anyway, you want people to follow for your art, not flavor of the month memes/art . And here I get to another subject: drawing popular stuff because that's what gets you followers. But that's another topic for some other time

No. 1709488

File: 1695919305214.jpg (397.79 KB, 1448x2048, [20-05-17] 1261847945600622592…)

>>1709454
I have noticed that Japanese artists never stop practicing either. Aruurara is by all means a pro, but you see him streaming his daily figure drawing sessions and talking about the new drawing books he picked up. A bunch of Japanese artists also have side accs where they post their studies, I don't think I have ever seen that with a western artist asides Pika, they normally settle on a shitty style and stagnate. How bleak, at least we aren't on the tumblr steven universe era anymore, although it's still less cancerous than the mspaint doodle of anime girl doing something quirky era that were are witnessing right now.

No. 1709495

>>1709488
There are plenty of professional western artists that do exercisesdaily, but you're all online and most dint stream due to them already having jobs that pay them and usually, likedisney,own everything they produce as long as they are signed up with the company. They don't have the luxury to just stream and show their work. They aren't allowed. Otherwise you're stuck with tumblr westerners who draw for fun and less about showcasing practices. If you're just looking for anime/cartoony work from western artists, you're going to have a hard time not just finding fan twitter anons who post on picarto sometimes,but those tend to just be draw dumps/request streams.

No. 1709502

>>1709495
Most anime artists are also hobbists with a fanbox at best. Aruurara has never done professional work besides having a fanbox. You will never see those uber popular twitter western artists actually practice or strive to be better and get out of their comfort zone.

No. 1709513

>>1709502
Probably because they don't get engagement from posts like that like Japanese artists do either. I don't see sketches and the like getting as much attention on the US side of twitter ever. The closest you get is messy adoptables. People like the end result which sucks because I personally like seeing a whole page of patchy and half-done torsos or eyes. I like seeing the practices, but overall that won't get you the attention you want. A lot of people save that stuff for portfolios, which you can see on websites vs twitter, or for hardcover portfolios. They don't waste their time posting their progress online.

No. 1709515

>>1709454
>>1709488
No offense but there's also plenty of Japanese artists who've draw in the exact same style for many years and while good aren't exactly amazing on a technical level. Just look at how much officially released manga has barely above decent art.

No. 1709524

>>1709515
Thats why it's so easy to spot a Japanese artist lol They all migrate to the same style. Comiket has the same look in almost 80% of the mangas.

No. 1709527

>>1709357
>first of all they don't seem to care as much about meme shit. Secondly they have a lot more patience when it comes to letting artists create.
Asian artists definitely fold harder than western artists under pressure, so in my headit must be that their fandom encourages experimentation. Ah, my favorite artist is drawing for a completely different interest now? Splendid, instead of throwing an entire autistic tantrum of "why aren't you drawing X anymore??" I'm going to support them. You know? Feels like they have stronger support systems. I don't know how to describe it, they just do shit. They just draw things. Not to say there's no fandom drama or petty bickering (there is, lots) but they seem to stick together for most of the time. They don't just exclusively seek out memes and shitposts to retweet. They see something they like they pass it around.
>Meanwhile my japanese followers will follow me for years and still interact even when I completely changed the subject matter of what I post kek.
I have a mixed bag of friends from different asian fandom regions and one of the most surprising things they have told me recently is that they usually make the jump from twitter to other platforms. Meanwhile in the west we build a platform on somewhere else (tumblr, newgrounds, etc) and make the jump to twitter. What does that tell me? I don't know. I feel like twitter is far more successful when you bring in an audience from somewhere else and have them boost your ratings. Then your art actually appears on people's pages… It makes me curious now. I'm going to ask some of them to see if they agree with these notions now.
>it's that the western audience is shittier. Plus it makes our artists less motivated to try or improve when they can shit out Reimu drinking grimace shake in a white void in mspaint and get 50k likes.
Agree completely, unfortunately. And it's been this way for a hot minute now. It's demoralizing. You can make something really good and even if it gets a very good amount of reshares with compliments, it will always be overshadowed by some meme or humorous thing you did. And it made me think, why not make shitty memes and shitposts to bait people into following you and then post what you want? After all it's common knowledge(?) nobody gives a fuck about your original content before you build an audience on fanart. Some of my more popular friends did this exact method and it worked for them. Somehow it feels like you're holding a net out, you'll fail to catch the people that just want their daily consoom dose to-go (they always unfollow in the end), but you'll catch those that genuinely like your style.

No. 1709541

>>1709527
About your first point; yes and no. Japanese fandom is absolutely autistic about tagging your art with the 'right' tags to make sure it only ends up visible to those that want to see it. For example I'm a fan of a joseimuke game, and the fandom for those that ship BL and those that ship yume exist entirely outside of one another. And yes, they get very upset if you fuck up your tagging and your yume fanart ends up on BL timelines.
Secondly it's more common for artists to make accounts just for one fandom, so once they move on they just stop posting there and you have to hope you happen to find them again.

No. 1709555

>>1709203
Good Western artists are probably fleeing social media more and more often, I used to follow many of them in some older fandoms years ago on tumblr and twitter and they stopped posting as often as they used to because they all got annoyed or even harassed at some point by the kid of "artists" who just doodle some unfunny memes and call it a day, and they almost all made private twitter accounts so they can just occasionally shitpost with their friends. Some of them earn money thanks to art so they just post from time to time about commissions and post some art once a month at most and leave asap.

No. 1709557

>>1709541
>Japanese fandom is absolutely autistic about tagging your art with the 'right' tags
NTA but god, I saw this happen a few months ago. I follow this one JP artist (whose entire page is her art of a game series) who did a collab with a popular Vtuber, drawing her with the MC of said game because she started to stream it.
DeepL only could get me so far, but from what I understood looks like the artist tagged the art wrong and she had an avalanche of angry people barking at her on her askbox, so much it remains closed today and her account was locked for a bit. She also received some "waah waah we follow you for [game], stop drawing the Vtuber, we don't care" messages.
It surprised me a lot, specially since she's kind of a profesional artist, I thought people would be more respectful.

No. 1709564

>>1709541
They freak out if they even find out a vtuber is dating someone. Japanese fans are crazy a lot of the time, they don't even see artists as human. At least western audiences tell you to take a break now which wasn't the case years ago when producing daily was an utmost must over your mental health. You have mangakas passing out trying to meet unattainable deadlines. This is why the ones who do have social medias posts usually far between. I don't know why asian fans in general froth at the mouth over stuff. You do anything fan theory away from canon and they freak the hell out.

No. 1709594

>>1709541
Oh wow, I only marginally remember that. Admittedly I don't do ship stuff anymore so that makes sense. Thanks for correcting me. Does anyone happen to know how Japanese fandoms differ from Korean or Chinese fandoms?
>so once they move on they just stop posting there and you have to hope you happen to find them again.
How does that even work? It feels so hard to get the twitter algorithm to pick you up if you're just starting from scratch, am I just stupid?

>>1709555
>and they almost all made private twitter accounts so they can just occasionally shitpost with their friends.
No kidding. Nobody wants to deal with social media anymore. I even see some non artists here and there commenting and/or complaining that everyone's gone insular. Everyone's got some little private this or that with like 5 to 10 to 20 with no moderation and trusted friends just shooting the shit now.

>>1709557
That's disappointing..

No. 1709612

>>1709594
NTA but on your first point, they just do. I have noticed often they don't care about followers/likes as much as we do, specially if they're just a hobby artist. So they just open the account and post about their new fandom, become mutuals with other accounts that post the same stuff as them and that's all. Honestly is kind of how in Tumblr people make (or used to) sideblogs for each of their fandoms and aesthetics.

No. 1709614

>>1709541
I actually prefer tag autism and I think a lot of fandom drama would be diminished if everyone properly tagged their shit and filtered out stuff they don't want to see and just stayed in their respective lane. Can you even blacklist tags on twitter? Centralized algorithmic social media is a plague.

No. 1709627

>>1709614
>>>1709541
I actually prefer tag autism and I think a lot of fandom drama would be diminished if everyone properly tagged their shit and filtered out stuff they don't want to see and just stayed in their respective lane.
This. It's the smallest most miniscule effort at being courteous to tag your shit and I don't get why people act like you're asking them to jump to the moon if you request proper tags.

>Can you even blacklist tags on twitter?

You can mute any word so it doesn't show up on your feed so yes. I've muted ships, series and characters that I don't want to see and it works great, but a lot of aloof artists just don't bother with tagging and I guess it's fine if you're a small artist but when your art consistently gets 200+ retweets it would be polite to add at least a tag for the ship and the source. A lot of people like to browse the algorithm feed because the chronological feed gets clogged up by a lot of unrelated casual tweets so your art might show up for them even when they're not following you.

No. 1709631

>>1709454
I don't know if you posted that image as an example of some "super intricate 8+ hour art piece" or the subpar one because it's extremely mediocre with broken anatomy, unbalanced composition, flat shadows with nonsensical folding.

No. 1709641

>>1709631
most anons ITT are weeaboos, they think soulless anime art with strange rendering is good

No. 1709658

File: 1695931337105.jpg (572.44 KB, 1000x1415, 82693443_p0.jpg)

>>1709631
I posted because it's visually pleasing with a nice level of detail, if I wanted to post an 8hr+ one I'd upload something else
You can post something you consider better if it's not to your liking, if that's mediocre than I don't want to see western mediocrity
>>1709641
Wouldn't call myself a weeb but the soulless anime art you're refering to is probably the ultra generic cute/moe style which is prevalent everywhere nowadays, which I'm also not a huge fan of regardless of how pretty or shiny the colors are,pic related

No. 1709661

>>1709658
anons ITT are gonna nitpick no matter what, the most generic anime shit artist is still miles better than the twitter popular western artist

No. 1709664

>>1709162
This video feels like watching high schoolers fight. I've just gotten way too old for absolutely retarded twitter bouts like this and chippledipple gets way too invested in the """trolling""", it's clear that despite playing the "cool centrist who just makes epic maymays" role it gets under his skin real bad and that's why he keeps lashing out. He was honestly asking for it for constantly picking on mentally ill and chronically online people for attention, like what the hell was he expecting to happen? Play stupid games and win even stupider prizes. Scrotes who poke the hornet's nest with low effort rage bait and then cry about being bullied are pathetic.

No. 1709673

>>1709661
Two countries with different tastes. Same way I hate picasso but love money. I absolutely hate the sameface look most Japanese art has. Everything looks like love live, genshit, or pokemon generic kawaii. Same way you probably feel like everything looks like disney/pixar over here. I don't think a Japanese artist is innovative or unique for drawing the same think everyone else in Japan draws.

No. 1709679

>>1709454
>>1709658
It's hilarious this was posted as some sort of amazing art piece when anons ITT were shitting on an artist for daring to have more then a hundred followers for drawing generic fanart here >>1708270 just because the artist for the first one is Japanese doesn't somehow make it better.
Also if we're talking general 'cute' artists that just draw cute girls, there's significantly better artists around then what you've posted.

No. 1709680

>>1709661
>the most generic anime shit artist is still miles better than the twitter popular western artist
Exactly.

No. 1709682

>>1709673
lurk moar there are tons of japanese artists who dont draw moeshit, just like how there are tons of western artists who dont draw calarts/pixar blobs

No. 1709684

>>1709673
>I hate picasso but love money
Sorry, I laughed

No. 1709793

>>1709454
this post is so funny when compared to places like the CSP marketplace where people buy and sell collections of pre-drawn hands and a traceable 3d versions of anything you could ever possibly imagine. there are so many prefabricated assets it seems like a lot of them are allergic to actually making art. but yeah every "jap artist" out there spends 90% of every waking moment honing their craft and creating magnificent compositions from scratch

No. 1709826

>>1709793
yeah and when they do use them it looks bad, none of those asset flip artists make it

No. 1709851

File: 1695947874975.jpg (1.62 MB, 3000x3600, 5c2a3e5527a5312b4159a03482064f…)

>>1709793
Yeah except only people who don't know how to do digital art and professionals who make their own 3d models and stamp brushes use those type of crutches. One is trying to find a shortcut because they don't know how to draw and they're too lazy to learn how to, the other is most likely in a time crunch.

No. 1709854

File: 1695948228341.jpg (86.29 KB, 300x500, 290599f7498c12ee692182c5e1f28b…)

>>1700740
Maybe you should try Harvest Moon or Rune Factory games Nonna. They're all mostly drawn in chibi or a more simple art style, and the boys are drawn just as cutesy as the girls. All the games have different art styles so maybe someone will strike your fancy

No. 1709856

>>1709851
Unrelated to the discussion but I used to love Avogado's art so much, but now I feel like their art is predictable and cliche. It used to feel more real before.

No. 1709860

>>1709793
CSP is used by comic and manga artists who need to churn out work as fast as possible, this isn't the same as discussing non-comic art and illustrations where most artists are not going to use those tools.

No. 1709866

>>1700887
Claudia (real name of the Ranfren comic author) is canadian. Didn't know she was a TIF now.

No. 1709876

>>1709856
AYRT and yeah, there's only so many angels and metaphors for abuse and depression before it starts to get same-y. His colours and compositions are still nice (although a bit more simple and less intense and visceral) but it feels like his conceptual strength is running a bit low and he's just using the exact same themes over and over

No. 1709882

>>1705706
>>1705626
Do you nonnies have any other doll creators you particularly like?

No. 1709904

>>1709882
Here's Etellan who I peronally think has improved since her older videos as she used to abuse facial blushing to the max but as has gotten better in her recent vids and has some unique dolls too.

No. 1709909

>>1709217
I’m just hung up on her right shoulder missing and right breast is higher than her left. Other than that it just looks generic but if you’re a fan it sells.

No. 1709927

>>1709909
Can't stop thinking how her clavicle bone might be misplaced or how that and her chest seems to be overtly detailed compared to other body parts but thats a given since her chest is THE focal point of it all

No. 1709941

>>1709927
If you’re gonna draw boobs you need to get the skeleton right. I had to double check for the clavicle hut you're right. It’s just small lines lmao. Who is that ecchi Aussie artist? She could learn from him.

No. 1709952

>>1708943
holy shit I recognize this artist because there are a billion callouts referencing him on twitter

No. 1709953

>>1709952
Give us the milk if you aren't going to sage nona

No. 1709959

File: 1695956265610.jpg (61.72 KB, 549x843, uh.jpg)

>>1709952
Oops, fair. I only saw it in passing but browser history came in clutch
https://twitter.com/angelmawsexpose

No. 1709963

>>1709959
Oh my god she's still around??? Wasn't she brought up in a previous artist salt thread for being weird

No. 1709968

>>1709826
>>1709860
CSP is used by illustrators as well, and you can absolutely trace in non-comic art and illustrations. plenty of people do. you just won't notice it if they're not terrible at art, which is a form of selection bias.

No. 1710068

>>1709682
I said that.

>>1709684
I didn't realize that autocorrected from Monet LOL

No. 1710103

File: 1695968736159.jpg (135.09 KB, 942x1062, FvBYYj5WIAAHXEB.jpeg.jpg)

>>1709959
Fascinating how pedo OC, similar designs and scamming thousands out of customers are on the same level for these people

No. 1710126

>>1709658
Most Japanese art is soulless coomshit these days. The only way you can get popular on Japanese social media is by drawing Blue Archive characters or porn.

No. 1710164

File: 1695982765209.jpeg (426.92 KB, 2048x1009, 3BE0E64D-6BC6-4DF5-96DA-71BEA2…)

>>1710126
>Most Japanese art is soulless coomshit these days.
No, only in moeshit anime. There’s plenty of good Japanese art and even famous Japanese cartoonists in our modern day that create super charming art like pic related

No. 1710165

File: 1695983085602.png (614.76 KB, 635x1200, image_2023-09-29_202448916.png)

>>1710126
Nona I beg you to go look at the Westaboo thread in /m/, it's all mostly Japanese artists with massive galleries of goofy fanart. Just because you're seeing one type of art doesn't mean it's all like that, kek what a fallacy you have there

No. 1710168

>>1710126
>>1710164

i feel like there's two big sides of japanese art, the one that is just same faced anime girls with huge boobs, and the one with a lot of different motiffs and full of soul

No. 1710191

>>1710164
Anon don't listen to people like >>1710165 because they can't clearly understand the difference between art for a gallery (your pic) and husbando yumejo shit posted on twitter
>Inb4 some angry baiter says it's all the same
I'm not even going to waste my time explaining this to hobbyists with no real career that use imageboards for gossip occuring between nobody artists on twitter

No. 1710199

>>1710189
Nona, I'm >>1710165 and I was replying to >>1710126 saying Japanese art was souless and was typing my reply before >>1710164 even showed up (my wifi is abymally fucking slow). Actual gallery art is obviously better than fanart, there is no debate and anyone who thinks so is a actual retard.

Unless you misclicked, in which case that contempt was well directed

No. 1710202

>>1710199
I think I'm just sleepy it's 5am here sorry

No. 1710203

>>1710202
Happens to the best of us

No. 1710214

>>1710164
OT and a completely retarded tangent but if I had a dollar for every time i’ve seen both of their art taken and slapped onto a shein quality shirt or print or made into a DIY Y2K kawaii zoomie shit keychain I’d be a millionaire. Swear I’ve never seen artists just stolen from as much as them, not that they probably care kek they’re so big.

No. 1710284

>>1709952
>Him
It's a gendie girl nonita

No. 1710351

>>1709205
i like their pastel set, the main one doesnt have any light shades at all
they don't blend as well as copics (some colors are especially bad) but for the price i can't complain

No. 1710459

File: 1696010454571.png (1.48 MB, 1461x2122, 101664618_p13.png)

>>1710191
The yumejo artists have more skill than those gallery artists used as example. Just because goofy with bed eyes isnt hanging in a gallery and being used to launder money it doesnt mean it requires less skill than painting the same shitty blob with sameface in a void like that guy on the left. I genuinely dont understand disliking anime sameface but then liking some boring ass art just because it's hanging in a gallery.

No. 1710461

I feel like people who say "all modern west art is inferior to east art" and vice versa just don't look art outside of social media

No. 1710467

>>1710164
that scrote's art always gives me bad vibes. i distrust men to meaningfully understand the complexities of girlhood and don't like when they draw little girls
>>1710459
based

No. 1710468

>>1710461
No one is saying that ITT at least, even japanese anime artists appreaciate classical western art. I can't think of a single modern western artist I like though, but that's because I don't like modern western aesthetics like that plastic splashart look.

No. 1710474

File: 1696011147343.gif (1.58 MB, 354x264, tumblr_c2c071e32309180d686c1ec…)

>>1710467
>i distrust men to meaningfully understand the complexities of girlhood
no way his shitty drawings have ''meaning''. I really dislike modern gallery artists, they are all so gimmicky. The dog reminds me of this. I have seen artists with <1k followers post more meaningful and moving art, and the didn't have to explain it to you nor were hanging in a gallery. What a scam.

No. 1710476

>>1710459
Of course someone like you would be triggered this much, not surprised.

No. 1710478

>>1710467
I’ve felt weird about his art too tbh. Before I knew a man made them, I thought they were a woman’s art because it always seemed to feature girls, but when I learned he was the artist, it felt strange but idk why.

No. 1710481

>>1710476
No one is triggered, it's just dumb to disregard art just because it's not haging on a gallery. I am sorry but those examples posted are ugly and uninteresting.

No. 1710482

>>1710481
Sure goofy-chan

No. 1710485

>>1710482
I am not a goofy yume but i would legit kms if a goofy fucker was more skilled than me, those gallery artists need to step up

No. 1710487

>>1710481
By your logic I should always see those shitty pixiv broken anatomy art I see all the time in high regard huh? It's so retarded even to have this discussions both East and west has good and bad artists

No. 1710492

>>1710487
If you aren't capable of seeing the skill past the subject you are just a wannabe elitist. Those examples in particular are not only very low skill but also incredibly boring. At least i can appreaciate the anatomy skill of some turbo coomers, I can't say the same thing for anachans hugging and weird girl blob in the void. It's fine if you like them, but they arent better just because they are handing on a gallery.

No. 1710502

>>1710485
>>1710487
What I'm about to say us subjective and I shouldn't even reply because I know almost everyone itt is a twitter tier artist, a hobbyist, or don't give a fuck, but in the end there's more than one audience for art out there, gallery art is a niche with its own art lovers and has nothing to do with pixiv fan art etc. which is also it's own niche. The art world is so big with so many things in it like a tree diagram or a river that goes through different paths or whatever, gallery artists are not going to be jealous of pixiv artists or viceversa no matter the skill or how many viewers your post has because both people even if they are artists, participate in completely different communities with their own wishes, needs and rules. To compare both is dumb, because there's a bunch of shit behind all kinds of art other than "style = bad" and to reduce it to that is just not fair to any kind of artist out there. You can disagree whatever

No. 1710504

>>1710492
>Coomers are better
Do people in this thread really?

No. 1710510

>>1710492
Can't believe how retarded some of you are, or is this obvious bait

No. 1710515

>>1710504
>>1710510
Look, I just prefeer skill>some gimmick style, so I am going to appreaciate some coomer who put in the time to learn Hampton and Vilppu over some guy with a boring style and low skill. If you like the weird dog guy or the anachan artist that's fine, but I won't hold them at a higher regard just because their art is on galleries. Balthus is a gross unskilled pedo and his shit is hanging on galleries, it's not a metric for being a good artist.

No. 1710520

>>1710515
Thanks for reminding me everyone in this thread thinks like this

No. 1710524

>>1710520
are you a gallery artist? i don't understand why anyone would be that pissed off that people don't kiss the ground gallery mainstream artists walk on

No. 1710526

>>1710524
Sorry but I'm not going to keep this conversation going when I already know all responses are going to be skewed, biased and inflammatory and terminally online just like in every other thread on here, I don't think fanart is inferior to gallery art in any case, just two different things that have no business being compared to each other, but people still will no matter what because no one really gives a shit besides people who do give a shit, so suit yourself

No. 1710530

>>1710526
>calls out people for being terminally online
>on a niche imageboard

No. 1710534

>>1710530
I don't want to infight nonny, because in the end none of what I say matters and will be taken out of context or something else entirely

No. 1710535

>>1710530
Lolcow isn't as niche as you might think, not after creepshow or the kf fiasco

No. 1710565

File: 1696016745754.jpg (1.44 MB, 624x1673, a6eccdc931a8b235f039a7b94e445a…)

>>1710164
Fine art is such a joke. If these were digital drawings posted online, they'd get lost in the sea. But because they're painted on 10ft canvases, it's fine art. There are super skilled fine artists, and then there's people like this who got lucky. Check out Fuyuko Matsui's work, it actually stands out.

No. 1710572

File: 1696017385429.jpg (Spoiler Image,146.63 KB, 785x1024, d95419eb6d35e3a7e732bec46921e2…)

>>1710565
they are trying to pass lolishit as fine art now too kek this dude got to work with pharael williams in a music video just because his loli drawings get hanged on galleries, how bleak

No. 1710591

>>1710572
fascinating how elsewhere anime crap appears in galleries, in Czechia everybody in the academic world of art would laugh at this and probably bully the artist for life kek

No. 1710594

File: 1696018792945.jpeg (Spoiler Image,120.75 KB, 1200x801, Murakami_MyLonesomeCowboy_Hiro…)

>>1710591
Fucking museums overseas bring this shit to be exposed as fine art. I bet they would laugh at the idea of making an exposition about actual anime but ironic shit like this gets a full exposition, kek. The critiques are hilarious too
>mesmerize through an unsettling combination of innocence, carnal knowledge, beauty, exquisite artifice and arrested movement

No. 1710608

>>1710164
the male artist's art is charming when you first see it, but if you have seen one of his pieces you have seen them all. They all look the same. I'm not too familiar with the female artist but the small sample I have seen of her work bores me

No. 1710609

>>1710468
I'm talking about people like >>1709454 There's other facets of art. To say you don't like any western artist at this point just means you haven't sought out others or even looked at different mediums. It's hard to describe modern art as "eras" because there's so many art styles and so many influences. You could branch out more though. But what do you mean by "plastic splashart look"?
>>1710594
God I hate male art from any country. I watched an interview of this one popular American artist from the 90s and he compared his collage art of playboy nude cut-outs as something comparable and influential to Andy Warhol's work. Was even funnier to me because I hate Warhol's shit too

No. 1710614

>>1710609
>You could branch out more though
feel free to recommend me stuff if you want, i like highly skilled art though
>plastic splashart look
lol splash art

No. 1710622

>>1710614
Sorry, when I hear splash art, I think of generic league of legends stuff kek. If that's what you're talking about, yeah that sucks. I'm a game illustrator and that's basically standard for a lot of online games. But what's funny is that half of those illustrations are by asians or people who come from an eastern country. But I could recommend some good artists if I got a sense of what you like. Highly skilled is pretty broad.

No. 1710632

>>1710622
stuff like rockwell, dean cornwell, leyendecker, nc wyeth, mead schaffer

No. 1710697

>>1710632
>Devin Korwin
>Syd Mills
>Phil Hale
>Sidharth Chaturvedi
If you're looking for more anime/stylized I like
>helium_raven on twitter
Most of their styles are realistic, or at least trying to be. The last one, I can't tell if she's eastern or western because she has a big western following and draws a lot of western musicians. I'm sure there's more too, but that's a start. Most people who draw realism nowadays stick to ArtStation, Instagram, or sometimes even stay strictly traditional. You won't be able to get someone who captures the old-timey essence like the artists you mentioned though.

No. 1710699

File: 1696027102648.jpg (427.91 KB, 1000x1500, sidharth-chaturvedi.jpg)

>>1710697
Samefag, dropped the pic. Picrel is Chaturvedi, he mostly does concept work and fantasy stuff though

No. 1710708

>>1710594
This is so depraved and cursed. That quote is killing me though lmao

No. 1710733

>>1710699
thanks anon really liked sidhart and chatuverdi, always loved phil hale, but not a huge fan of the rest. helium_raven art is pretty but i dont think i can follow someone who glorifies rapists, her style is a bit too messy and stiff too so i will pass, sorry

No. 1710734

File: 1696029713163.png (Spoiler Image,2.55 MB, 2048x1365, image_2023-09-30_091741640.png)

>>1710474
>>1710502
>>1710565

I'm >>1710199 and admittedly I was thinking of stuff like Patrica Piccini's dolphin man (picrel) or Louise Bourgeois or Alexsandra Waliszcekwa when I said gallery art was better than fanart, but all you make really good points nonnas.

No. 1710764

>>1710164
These are two very good examples of creative and passionate "rudimentary" artists. Japanese people have really mastered the art of making simplicity and childlike pieces look cute and loveable.

No. 1710768

>>1710734
I fucking hate these obvious pedophile dogwhistles.

No. 1711061

File: 1696045585372.png (90.84 KB, 194x259, image_2023-09-30_134539374.png)

>>1710768
Her art is supposed to be really uncanny and disturbing, it's all about exploring where humanity stands with animals and technology and how we're constantly shifting the environment for both and the ethics of it.
For example, why do you feel uncomfortable about this genetically modified finger baby when you yourself may own a pure breed animal. It has nothing to do with pedophilia, she's just a weirdo.

No. 1711068

Sorry to samefag and OT, but the dolphin man was probably inspired by a hypothetical surgery to put dolphin fetuses inside women and that's probably some fucked up cross breed.

No. 1711189

File: 1696061978636.jpg (53.25 KB, 1067x1200, downloadfile.jpg)

>>1710764
>>1710164
if an american artist had drawn this it would had been posted in the bad art thread and we would have anons saying that it looks like the girl is missing a chromosome. I dont even hate his art but I doubt he would have gotten famous on an international scale if he wasn't japanese. The art world has a mystified image of japan where they describe japanese fine art as "childlike whimsy but eerie" no matter what it looks like

No. 1711192

>>1711189
THANK YOU ANON this shit ugly

No. 1711206

File: 1696065158284.jpg (866.42 KB, 4032x3024, javier_calleja_bill_brady04.jp…)

>>1711189
This spanish artist is like the long-lost cousin kek. Honestly these kind of art is only impresive because they're drawn on giant canvases, the actual art is just mid.
Galleries are full of despotism, have enough money or a some connections and you're automatically considered a fine artist, everyone knows that. Of course there are still actual artists here and there, but the majority of them are just famous because money.

No. 1711207

>>1709963
if scamming people out of thousands is being weird yes

No. 1711219

File: 1696067572396.jpg (Spoiler Image,24.62 KB, 474x711, viggo wallensköld.jpg)

>>1711189
You're right and I don't know what anons are talking about. Design-wise his art is solid but it's also so fucking generic and it's obvious people like it just because it's "cute". And that's perfectly okay but it becomes embarrassing if you claim to like it because it's somehow magnificent in quality when it's actually just the same frowning blob over and over again.

On the topic of moid artists coming accross as creepy through their art, I fucking hate when stuff like picrel gets praised as this super deep fine art dealing with the complexities of humanity. The guy who painted picrel is an old dude and yet most of his paintings like this feature young women. When I saw this in a gallery I immediately got a bad feeling about it but nobody else seemed to notice. If you want to make body horror art or art dealing with your "trauma" like he said in an interview he did, why not make it about your moid body instead of painting the same vaguely young girl half naked? I'm so done with male artists.

No. 1711222

>>1711219
Is that gallery art? It looks like your typical pastel/charcoal introduction exercise a 16yo had to do for class.

No. 1711229

File: 1696069898360.png (Spoiler Image,403.53 KB, 600x770, image_2023-09-30_203133496.png)

>>1711219
Or something like pedo Hans Bellmer's stuff

No. 1711253

>>1710733
>i dont think i can follow someone who glorifies rapists
Nta, but what?

No. 1711270

>>1711219
This is fetish art 100%. It's so weird to me how people can't differentiate between very obvious fetish content/sadistic fap material and regular grotesque shit.

No. 1711295

>>1711253
pretty much all male musicians have slept with underage girls, david bowie raped a 14 year old

No. 1711300

>>1711189
Does anyone else get demoralized that your art can be immediately attributed quality/lack of quality based just on nationality? It's like this for other pieces of media obviously and doesn't just applies to the Japanese, but just by your nationality people either gets put you in a box t,wo artists of identical still, one gets a podium and a megaphone (daring visionary!) and international appraise and the other is some obsolete tryhard. Maybe it has something do too with how each individual country values art, but admittedly I'm not too knowledgeable. Admittedly I don't mind positive stereotypes (eastern european artists are always dark and broody) but coming from a country that has no positive art stereotype I just kind of feel left out. Seething, perhaps. I don't stand out because of my nationality, in fact I'm expected to try harder and go above and beyond for a crumb of appraisal. There was a topic of discussion on twitter at one point a few years ago that third world artists were "cheating" the market by charging cheaper because we have undervalued currencies… sorry? What would you like us to do? It's not our fault.

No. 1711302

>>1711189
>>1711206
is all you need to be a fine artist to have a quirky unique style that's easily replicable? this shit is like nfts

No. 1711304

>>1711219
>>1711229
this is such obvious fetishism, notice how there is barely any art depicting men like this

No. 1711333

File: 1696083382151.jpg (318.31 KB, 720x1009, uuuu.jpg)


No. 1711348

>>1711333
weakest fujoshi

No. 1711353

>>1711219
>>1711229
>>1710572
Repulsive moid fetish shit and childporn. I don't see the difference between fine art childporn and pixiv childporn, topkek

>>1710504
>Do people in this thread really?
Yes >>1710515 they apparently do anon; you are correct people in this thread really. What good is "skill" if it goes towards moid fetish, the humiliation of women and girls and child pornography?

>>1710478
You felt weird and strange because you know in your heart that its voyeuristic as a grown man to feature female children in your "art".

No. 1711355

>>1711353
>What good is "skill" if it goes towards moid fetish, the humiliation of women and girls and child pornography?
to steal from them and use it to draw gay porn and femdom ofcourse

No. 1711356

I hate it when an artist is really skilled but looking at their gallery it's all just a bunch of genshit. What a waste of time. You can always tell when it's genshit because all of it looks the same. I deliberately ignore/don't like any art with it because I'm sick of seeing it. I have some art friends who are in too deep I had to mute, it's like a fucking plague and I wish it'd die.

No. 1711360

>>1711356
That's really petty honestly, let them enjoy their shitty gacha game. I genuinely wish there was a franchise i was obssesed over so I could have something to draw without worrying much about it.

No. 1711364

>>1711360
She's just blocking the content she doesn't want to see, how is that petty? It's way better than people who go out of their way to complain to you for drawing X thing at least.

No. 1711365

>>1711229
I really wish I could unsee this old pedo fossil moids shit from you nonna. I'm looking at this moids art and seething. Why do we as a society even have laws against child porn at this point? How do freedom of childporn "artistic expression" artfags justify this?

Laws against childporn are a larp for males. Child abuse being a taboo is a larp for males, child abuse itself is a larp for males. What's the point if you can make it anyway, and distribute it freely if you call it "art". I can't even bring myself to post it, sickening.

No. 1711366

>>1711364
It's petty to be this angry about it, genuinely dont get the Genshin hate even though I don't play it, I will take it any day over minecraft/fnaf/fortnite and other popular games.

No. 1711376

>>1711366
She didn't sound that angry

No. 1711383

>>1711348
Aomeone tell the weakest fujoshi to take breaks

No. 1711390

>>1711383
not even god can stop her

No. 1711413

>>1711366
I mean if I liked an artist but all they drew was something I was sick of I would be dissapointed as well, I think it's reasonable. She's most likely exagerating with the wanting to die part, honestly it's just social media, blocking/muting doesnt matter.

No. 1711415

File: 1696090759068.jpg (1.14 MB, 500x2687, 1658260830551354.jpg)

Does anyone have examples of inspiring progress? I am feeling really down right now about my art skill level, and I need some motivation.

No. 1711431

>>1711333
if she was really dedicated she'd learn how to draw with her other hand.

No. 1711442

>>1711189
Thank you for speaking the truth. She's definitely missing some chromosomes by the way.

No. 1711448

>>1711442
I'd say she has one extra unnecessary chromosome instead

No. 1711484

>>1711483
all for to draw generic genshit porn…when does dedication turn into retardation? is her whole livelihood relied on art?

No. 1711489

File: 1696095168282.png (26.37 KB, 584x269, omg.PNG)

>>1711431
You would never understand

>>1711484
I don't think so, besides commissions and a patreon that was started some time last year there has been talk about classes unrelated to art.

No. 1711495

>>1711489
still what kind of day classes requires this much hand strain? if shes hurting this much wont that effect the other thing too? why is this shit so romanticized? this isnt the quirky hehe she thinks it is, just take a damn break

No. 1711498

>>1711495
This, having that much injuries because you draw is insane. That's not dedication. If they want to be able to draw a decade from now, they need to take some serious rest and treatment for their hands.

No. 1711505

>>1711333
i was gonna say based but she draws cuntboys so eh

No. 1711514

>>1711495
I really don't think the classes alone are causing the strain, drawing has to be worse than writing. I don't remember if they ever talked about what's actually going on with their body though, maybe it's generally prone to injury. But the issue is, how do you take a long break from it if it's something you really want to do? If it's a condition that'll never fully go away then there's not much of an alternative

No. 1711525

File: 1696098536402.jpeg (846.14 KB, 1170x1541, IMG_5197.jpeg)

Talented artist to pedobait panderer sure is something to be proud of. Yep.

No. 1711527

>>1711514
Sadly once it has happened there's no way to stop it the best you can do is to rest braces and trying to cope since art isn't her income source she doesn't need to worry for money ,as for art finding methods that cut down drawing rather than extending it like doing not so detail art and using photobashing or filters her condition mostly got worse by her coomer addiction and consistently posting(quanity over quality).I don't find this dedicated I find this you reap what you sow always maintain your hands and eyes since those are vital for a artist

No. 1711528

>>1711413

You're right in that I'm not actually that angry. I'm just sharing a salty thought. However I'm referring to wishing the genshin trend would die, not myself.

No. 1711535

>>1711525
from soulless to soulless

No. 1711560

File: 1696101015532.jpg (Spoiler Image,919.69 KB, 3030x3203, 1695509183241230.jpg)

what the hell is wrong with coomers. it was just a mcdonalds commercial

No. 1711564

File: 1696101657317.jpeg (60 KB, 320x244, hxupmnhz9vnb1 (Large).jpeg)

>>1711560
Its perplexing how much of a clusterfuck this one ad caused, you had /pol/tard scrotes trying to make this into a big event by saying this was a attack on wokeness by having a straight "white" couple, coombrained tranny pedos screaming like chimps that there must be porn made of this, coomer artists banding together to bring their degenerate fantasies to fruition and ofc many videos by retards commentating on this situation with the most spineless opinions, what the fuck happened.

No. 1711565

>>1711560
the fact you can tell this is made by some westoid. shadman did irreparable damage to the western art community

No. 1711572

>>1711560
why is her head so huge

No. 1711574

>>1711564
>>1711565
>>1711560
There's another take to this: that this is actually "propaganda" for the Japanese to start dating, marrying, and starting families to get their population back up.

No. 1711577

>>1711574
i genuinely don't understand how people can unironically think a mcdonalds ad is going to raise the birth rate

No. 1711583

File: 1696103287088.jpg (76.22 KB, 441x813, 3e6.jpg)

>>1711574
There's been a lot of talk about anime featuring more family content for this reason and it doesn't seem completely impossible, but depicting a family in restaurant ads also isn't anything out of the norm for any culture.

No. 1711585

>>1711560
>>1711574

They are retarded if they think that would work as if the billions of generic "wholesome" romance mangas and animes didnt already exist and was constantly consumed by the population.

No. 1711588

>>1711560
God I hate when people draw peppa pig faces on a semi-realistic/detailed body, it looks so bad. Some people manage to blend the animu head with the body a bit, but this man didn't even try

No. 1711592

>>1711564
>>1711574
The right answer is probably just that McDonald's competes with family restaurant chains in Japan and markets accordingly. The smarter scrotes try to be, the stupider they become, it's insane

No. 1711594

>>1711592
Idk why they think depicting a cute family eating their food would put them at the same level of places with food other than burgers and nuggets.

No. 1711596

File: 1696104887719.png (29.55 KB, 275x270, 1671504302112.png)

>>1711592
>The smarter scrotes try to be, the stupider they become, it's insane
Ikr? Put any media in front of a scrote, and there's a 99% chance the point is gonna fly straight over his head. Just look at how they missed the point by admiring Patrick Bateman. Did any of those retards even read the book?
>>1711560
I hate art like this because it perfectly demonstrates how coomers see anything at all: just ass and titties. The coomer didn't even bother sexualizing the mother character with the body type she actually has, and these types of artists NEVER stay accurate to characters they sexualize. Coomers obsess over, jack off to, want, and dream about ass and titties, so that's all they fucking draw even if it doesn't match how the character actually looks.

No. 1711599

File: 1696105073383.jpg (71.52 KB, 739x666, cure for scrottery.jpg)

>>1711564
It's fucking insane, rightoids just came up with some hoo-hah about "wokies" ~triggered~ by a mcdonalds ad featuring a straight couple with a kid because someone made a joke about the Japanese birth rate propaganda and everyone just took it and ran with this forced as fuck controversy and now they're drawing coomershit porn of it to own the imaginary "libtards" living inside their heads. Literally nobody was offended by this fucking ad but retards stuck in their anti-SJW era looking for outrage don't care. I fucking hate scrotes and I hate weeb /pol/ scrotes the most.

No. 1711897

>>1711527
anon if you're still here, do you know what her main income is? i can't imagine many jobs that allow you to work with limited hand usage. asking because hand injury is a genuine problem i fear, i do computer work as my day job and i worry about injuries (i'm nowhere near as bad that girl though)

No. 1711899

File: 1696140729910.jpg (30.72 KB, 564x564, 7db159f1c061274a551bb4e3d19dbb…)

>>1711535
Kek artanons on this site are a breath of fresh air, its rare for artists to see reality as is. picrel related

>>1711596
>The coomer didn't even bother sexualizing the mother character with the body type she actually has
Its not about her, or depicting her honestly or any woman or female at that, its only about coom; in this case hyper muscular homoerotic but simultaneously obese woman with pitiful arms and neck but huge man-sized bobble head coom. The original art is a woman but this "woman" is a obese transvestite based off of the proportions.

No. 1711901

>>1711899
The chimerical combination of muscles you would only see at a low body fat combined with fat thighs/tits and then tiny birdlike skeletal arms always triggers me like pick one.

No. 1711998

>>1711333
I'd feel bad for her injuring herself over and over due to excessive drawing if her "haha lmaoooo i can draw a masterpiece with my foot and with a stick guyssss haha" didn't sound like massive humblebrag attempts to make herself seem "cool" and "skilled" when all she draws is cuntboys.

No. 1712129

>>1711560
Retarded males will look at this weirdly proportioned woman and claim it's good art and then screech about some tumblrina drawing their waifu obese, racebent, and hairy. Pot calling the kettle black. It's the same shit. Of course because we live in a patriarchy, no one is making youtube essays about how coomer male artists are polluting fandoms and have art as poorly drawn as "sjw" art. I hate that they sexualized this wholesome ad.

No. 1712212

>>1711270
Agreed. Real gore comes in the form on making humans in to skin suits, purses, mutilation.. This is just fetish 100%, gore fetish trophy killing manipulation into furniture.. Like jfc. There's no other way to look at this. No one who likes gore does this shit. The CLOSEST this comes if in the form on movies like The Collector, and even then it's to displace the bones and skin and not for erotic reasons, more mad science. This image isn't even that.

No. 1712223

>>1711525
What pedoshit? I just went through the media tab and most of the characters have tits, not even drawing teens being suggestive. Do you just equate moe art to pedos for some retarded reason? At least post an example of the stuff you're even talking about. The artist is also a girl, she's drawing kemono type and monster girls.

No. 1712224

>>1711560
Momokun said she's cosplaying this. Be warned, you guys might get a cross-thread update.

No. 1712239

>>1711560
Don’t have the cap now because I saw it the other day, but some scrote was already calling for the child to be drawn like this too.

No. 1712242

File: 1696180452426.jpg (Spoiler Image,531.88 KB, 1447x2047, [23-09-25] 1706279129593881045…)

where do i even start with rendering, anyone got a course rec? i want to paint like pic rel

No. 1712243

>>1712242
I can't tell if this is bait or a serious inquiry.

No. 1712244

>>1712243
why bait, kek. its very well painted

No. 1712276

>>1712242
Do studies from photo references. They look like they're using candid photos that were taken in flash

No. 1712288

>>1712242
Is this sportacus kek

In al seriousness, the fur and some other textures like the the leather hat(?) seems to be photobashed. The rest looks painted with a shit ton of color correction and filters. And I think I'm also seeing a noise filter

No. 1712295

File: 1696184631316.gif (573.59 KB, 275x236, 1666520769961.gif)

Any of you ever take a step back just to be amazed by the unrelenting stream of drama in the "art community"? Especially the "commentary" part of it. Goddamn, it's like Youtuber or Twitter artists can't stop getting into unnecessary squabbles of drama with each other. Don't these people ever get tired? I thought making art was supposed to be relaxing KEK.

No. 1712302

>>1712295
i am honestly more scared by the amount of pedos in the art community it feels like every day you wake up to a google doc of some guy(often tranny identifying) grooming some poor child

No. 1712314

>>1712295
Honestly yes but it doesn't surprise me. Most online artists are advanced level aidens or some flavour of megagendie, they're always going to be a gang of narcs cannibalising eachother over retarded shit

No. 1712347

>>1712224
She posted it today (it’s in her thread) and it’s exactly as bad as you’d expect.

No. 1712668

File: 1696195028338.png (622.07 KB, 640x1023, depressing.png)

>>1712347
holy shit, anons are right its depressing as fuck women cant exist without being sexualized. women arent making porn of the husband, how bleak.

No. 1712688

>>1711560
I’m going to sperg about the animation because I thought it was a still image. After viewing it I cringed. The animation itself is really amateur, only a few looping frames against a static background and I felt bad for whoever made it. Japan is supposed to have better animation, are they falling behind like USA animators? Sad if true.

No. 1712693

>>1712688
I swear we've already had a infight about this in this thread or towards the end of the last.

No. 1712747

>>1712688
It's cute and more soulful than the trash that gets pushed as advertisement nowadays. I imagine it had a very limited budget since its done for twitter, and considering it's both modern advertisement and twitter advertisement at that i think it's pretty good. I enjoyed the one with the monsters more though, it was really cute and the looping felt more natural.

No. 1712756

>>1712688
Anon, it's supposed to be a looping twitter gif, not an animated short.

No. 1712936

File: 1696204919350.jpg (224.14 KB, 1000x667, 1000_F_548951591_QZDoInavvcECP…)

anons do you have any recs for western comics with nice/interesting visuals? i'd prefer original stories but hero stuff is good too ig

No. 1712950

File: 1696206066760.jpg (1.87 MB, 2137x2952, cbe9a2dcb73885db710954b8bf942c…)

>>1712936
bernie wrightson frankenstein

No. 1713009

>>1712668
Mf spoil this nonnie geez.

No. 1713012

>>1711583
Aaah man this is reminding me of Darling in the FRANXX. You know, the anime with the very very subtle sex metaphors (doggy style). Yeah Japanese citizens sure started fucking after that show aired lmao

No. 1713017

File: 1696210249244.jpeg (67.74 KB, 739x415, images (1).jpeg)

>>1712936
It's furry, but Blacksad's art is nice and neat. The facial expression are superb as the artist was a former Disney animator.

Though a little warning if you plan to read it for the story: its female characters are shit. They're either just girlfriends, dead, or dead girlfriends. The art is great though!

No. 1713023

File: 1696210570004.png (106.85 KB, 486x631, images.png)

>>1712936
Check out the works of Craig Thompson—his paneling is very creative and often strays from the standard "square, rectangle, square" type of paneling most Western comics do. His linework is very impressive too.

No. 1713065

>>1711333
instead of this overcomplicated shit, she could stretch, do arm and wrist strengthening exercises, and get more physically active in general. You just know she leads a life of bed to kitchen. Artists will complain about developing tendon and wrist problems but grip their pen like it’s about to make a break for it, shrimp-sit for hours, and have rolled shoulders so severe, it would make a boxer jealous.

No. 1713094

>>1711560
Unfortunately nothing new, /co/ scrotes found some animated Barbie commercial from the 70s and all the pedos and shadman wannabes flocked to it.

No. 1713102

File: 1696216954184.jpeg (35.86 KB, 607x910, 987FFC9A-FD3E-41FC-B0B3-50672B…)

>>1713094
Inb4 “that’s just an evil dead reference” yes but why does this drawing of a little girl put so much emphasis on her body by having it be drawn more realistic and almost giving an upskirt shot? It’s the biggest red flag when an artist draws a child with a realistic body but a cartoony face never ignore it anons it’s always a pedo art style. I am in support of giving cartoon little girl guns however if they could actually shoot moids.

No. 1713111

File: 1696217640202.jpg (1.32 MB, 1844x1971, 072 - copie.jpg)

>>1712936
the black order brigade and the hunting party (picrel is the cover art) by pierre christin and enki bilal. they're both standalone but thematically related comics from the early 80s that were considerd landmarks in the history of franco-belgian comics. then writing and art are beautiful and there was a good english translation, dunno if it's still in print but it's on libgen.

No. 1713121

>>1712688
Might want to get your glasses checked, at least back up what you mean. What about it was amateur kek at least provide a valid reason when its fundamentally wrong what you're saying. There was nothing wrong with the animation. Do you even animate or draw??

No. 1713127

>>1713121
Quoting you and referencing the other replies. Everyone said commercial so I was expecting more shots and better animation. Another anon said it’s a gif for a twitter ad which is not the same as a commercial. That’s why I was sperging. As a gif yeah it’s not bad but I wouldn’t call it a commercial. Something like the FREE! commercial is what I assumed it would be like hence the disappointment.

No. 1713156

>>1713127
being simple =/= amateur. that's like saying you cringed at a good artist, that you feel bad for them, and that they're falling behind because they posted a 20 minute sketch instead of a refind piece they spent weeks on. cope

No. 1713227

>>1713127
You have no idea what you are talking about. Do you call these amateurs too?

No. 1713286

I've been really depressed lately because I feel like there's no way to get my art out there. I KNOW likes shouldn't matter but it's my dream to make drawing my main income and I can't do that if literally no one sees it… I see all the time artists with the same skill level or worse have ton of followers and engagement, so it's not like my art is shitty. I'm genuinely confident I can do even better, it's just that I feel like no one even gives me a chance. I have seen some advice about "reaching out" but how do you do that? Only a big artist could boost my art and there's absolutely no fucking way I can befriend someone of that status or that they would even pay attention to me once they see I have like 30 followers. I tried instagram challenges, trendy hashtags and everytime I look at the post statistics there's almost zero people who see my art. It's so frustrating because whenever I post it simply gets drown in the thousands of artworks that are posted every hour.

No. 1713298

>>1713286
>my dream to make drawing my main income
Then apply for illustrator jobs and stop wasting time on instagram.

No. 1713301

>>1713286
Unless you are drawing porn or a webcomic, social media popularity doesn't have much impact on whether you can get an illustration job. It may certainly help you get more opportunities, but there are many insanely good artists who have very small followings. >>1713298 is right. But if you want popular artists to notice you, draw fanart of their OCs.

No. 1713303

>>1713298
>>1713301
I'm not saying I want to be a viral artist, I don't care about that but I'm thinking about the opportunities you get from having a bigger audience. I know a lot of artists got discovered through their social media accounts

No. 1713308

File: 1696238776958.jpg (344.57 KB, 1080x1920, mcd_jp.jpg)

>>1711560
Why do the mom and daughter look like copy-pasted moeblobs with the same proportions, while the dad looks like an actual adult? This is something that I observe rather often in animanga, particularly in moeshit/cgdct anime - males have normal proportions but all female characters are noseless, bug-eyed moeblobs. Am I being too nitpicky and retarded if I am upset over something like this?

No. 1713310

>>1713286
Being able to make a living with your art is a one in a million chance, anon. It's a dream worth chasing I guess but you also have to be realistic. If you want to do art for a living then get a job as graphic designer/artist or illustrator and develop and build your own brand on the side. I got a job in another field altogether because I'd be burned out drawing corporate art all day instead of stuff I actually like, and save all my creative art for my personal time.

Going viral isn't enough either, your piece might get like 50k likes yet get you no new followers at all. Making friends with more popular artists is the most efficient way to move up, but they can absolutely smell it when you're only approaching them for clout because you're not the first or the last one to do so. Instead of going for the people who already have a gigantic following, make friends with rising stars on your own level. You'll form way more authentic and fulfilling relationships and once you grow in popularity you're both sharing an audience you can promote each other to.

No. 1713311

>>1713308
It's not just you. The only exception I have in mind right about now is Gosho Aoyama's Case Closed where the women look like adults.

No. 1713312

>>1713308
>dad looks like an actual adult
"Adult" would be pushing it. The dad looks like he's fifteen years old in the face. But that only adds to why I don't like anime so much. Their faces are very frequently like the art world's version of unflavored, mass produced tofu squares. Completely fucking bland, way overdone, and only appreciated by people with shit-tier taste. I don't even see how people can disagree with how poorly designed the mother is for the ad. The fact that her face is identical to her small daughter's just says it all.

No. 1713330

File: 1696242055995.jpg (801.67 KB, 1080x1920, dde1f553755c0cd2ca99187b4b7d0b…)

>>1713308
if you had bothered to open any art program you can see that the mother and daughter dont have the same proportions on the bases on them having the same hairstyle why wont they? theyre related, its just a cute short ad

No. 1713331

>>1713330
Stop coping, you purposefully traced wrong just to mislead but they literally look the same and have the same proportions

No. 1713354

>>1713308
>>1713330
their faces are both moeblob and similar, but not the exact same. the kid has rounder cheeks and a way smaller skull, larger eyes, shorter philtrum, shorter distance between nose and eyes, and longer distance between eyes and eyebrows. moms neck and shoulders are also proportionately larger, even if you shrank their faces down to the same size.

tbh i think the real uncanny part is that everything else aside, the mom and kids face SIZES are basically the same. the overall sizes of their faces are way closer than the face proportions. and the moms skull is huge compared to her face, even the porn artists are drawing her with a bigger face.

No. 1713355

>>1713308
The dad looks like a generic 15yo shonen manga protagonist though.

No. 1713361

>>1713330
lol still looks the same. I don't get what you're trying to prove with the outline.

No. 1713365

why are we being so pressed about a MCDONALD'S advert? why don't you guy redline and critique Ronald Mcdonald or complain about how the Hamburgler is proportionally a child and bring into question why a child is being vilified for stealing food if we're going to be autistic about it.

No. 1713367

>>1713330
kek the way you intentionally drew over the actual lines on the mom's face to prove your point
animoids are mentally ill

No. 1713398

File: 1696248528771.png (16.03 KB, 557x194, jdkfvbpd9rguhf.PNG)

>>1711897
She doesn't share much about her personal life on twitter, she has only vaguely talked about being on jobhunt in march and then about not being able to work due to injuries back in april 2022, around the time when she was posting about commissions and patreon. Last I saw was this tweet about some classes. There have to be other circumstances with this person though, don't manga artists and people like Kim Jung Gi draw for hours each day without developing such issues? I know the former have assistants that take care of some parts, but even with that help there is still a lot of work done every day

No. 1713400

>>1713330
Did you do this on a phone or are your lines always this bad?

No. 1713409

>>1713398
some people have weak bodies

No. 1713438

When correcting mistakes on your sketches, is it better to erase the mistake area and redraw it completely from scratch, or is lassoing the mistake then sketching the corrected version on top effective too? For reference I’m trying to get better at anatomy and proportions. Like if I drew a shoulder too high up and I’m fixing it, should I erase the entire upper arm and redraw it completely? I’ve noticed redrawing takes me a few tries but lassoing and sketching on top is faster.

No. 1713440

>>1713438
Erase, otherwise you aren't learning anything, you're just editing.

No. 1713480

>>1713400
i did this in like 2 minutes sleep deprived so excuse the shaky lines kek but my point stands although the proportions are different as this nonnie pointed out>>1713354 the faces are copy paste ,anime artstyle suffers making the women look like children but in the end its just preference to style personally i dont like the moeblob look i dont know why this simple ass ad is causing this much outrage

No. 1713492

>>1713286
Right now is honestly a terrible time to try to live off an online art presence. Paypal is getting more bullshit fees by the day, not to mention the risk of getting your income locked for whatever random reason they decide. Patreon isn't doing great either from what I see, and ko-fi has its own share of issues.
At the end of the day your entire income will be dependent on sites that seem to all be in a form of turmoil right now.
And that's not to get into the fact that there's a global recession brewing (or already happening depending on who you ask) and one of the first things people will drop is any financial contributions to art content like commissions, merchandise etc.

No. 1713545

>>1713308
Plot twist they all siblings

No. 1713577

>>1713492
Coomers will always pay for custom porn. That's an avenue.

>>1713308
I agree with you. It's fake outrage.

No. 1713580

>>1713577
That's true, but once money gets tight they are probably going to keep supporting artists they already know instead of new ones. And it didn't sound like anon wanted to draw coom anyway

No. 1713589

>>1713308
>mcdonalds make a very creative loop animation for an ad even though they dont have to
>political spergs, coomers, nitpickers, schizos and trannies all join to shit on it for the dumbest reasons
all of you would be calling fido dido's commercials boring, soulles and lazy because they dont have backgrounds or something. I am just happy we got an ad with a little bit of effort instead of some shitty political statement or just people consuming the product, least these bazillion dollar comapnies can do is contribute to the world being a lil less soulless by paying artists instead of celebrities and trannies

No. 1713592

>>1713580
yes and no and I'm speaking from experience. A lot of people prefer a variety of artists and instead use specific ones who draw specific fetishes instead of using one artist for everything. I'm just using it as an example and will agree, as I've seen it happen to friends, that their PayPal are more susceptible to being locked due to drawing this, especially if you get the wrong person to be a douchebag and that doesn't even need to be a customer to report the account. Never, ever put donation links to Paypal, I will 100% always stand by that and make a separate Paypal for your business stuff. Just thought I'd put my two-cents in about how recession won't matter and then add in my big about the financial part.

No. 1713593

>>1713577
>Coomers will always pay for custom porn. That's an avenue.
Sure, but that solves only part of what I meant. There's still the issue that you're fully reliant on some websites that could implode at any moment, or fuck you over with new fees (something both paypal and patreon are currently doing).

No. 1713602

>>1713438
Lower the opacity of the sketch and draw over. That way you can see your previous mistake, and use it as a reference for the correction. Erasing it completely starts you over, and you're likely to just draw the same mistake again.

No. 1713603

>>1713593
You don't really have a choice, unfortunately.

I see it as a bank transaction fee like when you take money out of an establishment you don't bank with. It's just a transaction charge. For me, PayPal isn't that much, right now. The thing that does bother me is the transfer fees. I get the behind-the-scenes reason, they are actively having to allocate funds from one bank to another because the money isn't just magically digital, but the added fees on top of the transaction fees bother me, especially when it is increased vs the number of people who use the website. I don't know if it's because the website has to do the transaction for you on their side, plus they charge the "labor" of hosting the site. That's another thing, they pay their staff and because websites like these don't get donations, they take a part in hosting too. Not that millions of users aren't well over enough people to host the website for probably a few decades, but I don't see these sites imploding.

If they keep raising the prices, then I'm going to get upset because the number of users that rely on these sites should make up way more than enough for all these fees to not be raised when you take into account the cut the company is probably getting. They probably excuse it as a reason to keep low pay employees active because cost of living when in reality it's the PayPal hire ups that are just greedy. Like every company.

No. 1713607

>>1713589
>I am just happy we got an ad with a little bit of effort
Why are you happy about ads at all kek the consoomer mindset is crazy and it's insane how much weight americans especially place on ads, to the point where they can become pop culture and memes

No. 1713614

>>1713607
This wasn't an American ad. I don't even know why you are bringing this up. Americans are trying to make this an American issue and political and it's fucking stupid. Japan does ads like crazy too, they promote way more to consumerism than I see most places in America.

No. 1713616

>>1713607
i am not american and the ad isn't american either, i am just happy these big corporations are at least supporting artist. or would you rather have the left ad?

No. 1713631

>>1712950
>>1713017
>>1713023
>>1713111
Thank you anons i'll be checking them out later!

No. 1713634

>>1713616
I don't want ads at all

No. 1713635

>>1713634
ok but they are going to be made and exists anyways regardless of if you want them or not, so they might as well be at least creative and have effort put into them

No. 1713639

>>1713634
That's not a good enough reason to say the ad is bad.

No. 1713646

>>1713398
>Kim Jung Gi

he's dead, anon. drew himself to death like Kentaro Miura

No. 1713649

>>1713642
Ronald Mcdonald is the mythical terf who's killing black trannies ofc, spiders Georg style

No. 1713652

>>1713642
They were just supporting the BTLM thing. They are two different posting countries too, but same company. America wants brownie points and Japan is obsessed with traditional families and wanting people to have kids, so it will have an ad with both.

No. 1713658

File: 1696265535858.jpeg (234.72 KB, 640x857, jkrc4dj32srb1 (Large).jpeg)

>>1712239
A tranny scrote (like usual) to be more specific

No. 1713660

>>1713658
Which is crazy because the mother is literally just a version but older.

No. 1713662

>>1713660
they're pedos

No. 1713663

>>1713658
i hate coomers

No. 1713664

>>1713662
Yes, anon, I got that. I'm just pointing out the pointless reason to sexualize her when there is a carbon copy. Especially if anyone draws the girl with a sexualized woman-type body with tits and all. Then it's literally just the mom.

No. 1713668

>>1713664
i honestly dont think they coom to it anymore i think they just get the dopamine from seeing booba and porn because its so normalized

No. 1713669

>>1713660
Well, for starters men are likelier for rape 14 year olds than 24 year olds

No. 1713670

>>1713660
coomtards and especially trannies arent known for having much logic or morals, cause if they did they wouldnt be coomers lol

No. 1713671

>>1713616
Left > pedobait japanese cartoons

No. 1713672

>>1713669
Thanks for the daily reminder of why men are subhuman, even in their psychology.

No. 1713673

>>1713664
I'm just pointing out that it doesn't matter that there is an adult version for them to sexualize bc what they want is the child version. Look at the op. Sees an obvious child character and wants porn of them immediately. Fucking degenerates.

No. 1713674

All the examples of stunning inking in the thread are making me want to learn, are there any good resources for (traditional) inking? I only own some ballpoint pens and shitty years old microns, I'm willing to invest more into it but I have no idea where to start. Recommendations for supplies to buy? Any tutorials or processes that might help me figure this out? My lines always feel shaky. I've been told I need to slow down to improve them but then it just makes everything feel stiff.

No. 1713677

>>1713674
What kind of inking are you wanting to practice? Like with felt tip pen, brush, nib? Maybe you could pick up one of each and just try them out to see what you like. If you want brush and nib I would recommend buying a natural hair brush and some India ink (both can be found at art stores). Japanese inking nibs are cool too, you can find those in stores or online. I used to love inking with a brush. Just grab some paper and go nuts with it, your shakines will improve with time! I wish I had some specific tutorials for you but honestly it's just practice (I know, I know).

No. 1713678

>>1710565
Anyone can draw anything with the help of a computer, nonners. Art is only valuable when precious, and something you can screenshot is not one of a kind.

No. 1713686

>>1713677
Thanks nonita! I used to love inking with a brush a lot during school actually. Granted I was shit until my teachers gave me the advice to slow down kek then that gave me the issue of having stiff lines. I'll do some shopping around this week!

No. 1713693

>>1713686
Sure! Oh I just wanted to add, since you mentioned stiffness in your lines. I think that may be improved just by perhaps changing how you hold your arm/hand while you draw. You want a relaxed posture and larger, sweeping gestures across the page, not small movements with finger/wrists. Practicing gesture drawing can really help with this. You could even try gestures with ink if you're feeling spicy. Sorry I'm not able to look up anything atm but I'm sure youtube has some videos on hand/arm posture while drawing! And don't forget to have fun nonita~

No. 1713700

File: 1696268081129.png (2.43 MB, 1395x1445, cool inking.png)

>>1713674
same as you nonny! i wish i wasnt poor/talentless/retarded

No. 1713701

>>1713646
It says people like Kim Jung Gi tbf, and both of those at least made it to 47 and 54 while drawing every day. Their deaths didn't exactly stem from wrist issues

No. 1713707

File: 1696268361882.png (327.24 KB, 650x462, FosFRG_WIAAKBhT~2.png)

There's a client who wants me to draw her oc whos arab and has a hijab, but also wants a nude version of her. I'm going to get in trouble with the sjw, aren't I?

No. 1713708

>>1713707
thats probably a tranny larping

No. 1713732

>>1713708
100% sure it's a girl because her page is all pink and has they/them in the bio kek

No. 1713743

>>1713707
Tell the client(who's probably a troon)that you're uncomfortable posting the NSFW on your public account and will only send it privately.or better…reject the commission so your ass won't get cancelled

No. 1713767

>>1713732
trannies are even larping as fujos nowadays

No. 1713787

>>1713743
What are the chances of my dumbass getting cancelled? I already drew some nude version of other characters but since this one is arab and is wearing a hijab… I don't know.
Also I'm not popular or anything, but I don't want to play with fire either lmao

No. 1713804

>>1713732
all pink sounds like something a tranny would do as well though. and they know how they/them is associated with being used by actual females so they might choose it to larp better too.

No. 1713810

>>1713787
Is the commissioner themselves hijabi? If yes and it's just a regular nude you're probably fine because it shouldn't be too disrespectful, but if the person isn't muslim and you feel uncertain about this then say no. Getting a callout because of it seems unlikely to me, but you can always apologize and say that you weren't totally sure, did it for the money anyway and hoped the commissioner had no bad intentions and so on. If you don't post about it yourself it's unlikely to get out anyway

No. 1713821

>>1713810
no seriously religious hijabi is going to commision porn of a character, sure there are hijabi artists but these women are going to do normal art and not draw porn. if an actual hijabi is commisioning porn then i'd assume she's an unstable muslim-larper type and someone you do not want to involve yourself with. you don't need to give a reason for not drawing something, you can simply say not to a request. Would you feel comfortable drawing nun porn? Commisioning sexual art of religious women who specifically dress to desexualize themselves is creepy.

No. 1713822

>>1713804
oh
>>1713810
I don't wanna give too much info because I don't want to out myself kek but from what I've seen, the client seems to be a dark skinned FtM (idk why I attract these kinds of clients but moving on) so I'm not sure. I'm gonna ask anyway and in case they say no then I would not post the nude version. Thanks for your insight nona

No. 1713825

Not salty but I love how many fandoms have their own October challenges, it’s cute and I get to see my favorite less popular characters drawn if they’re lucky enough to be put on the list.
>>1713707
Just say you’re not comfortable drawing a religious character NSFW.

No. 1713840

>>1713227
Reading comprehension anon. Go back and watch the Free advert. It’s just like whar you posted. The gif is not a commercial.
>>1713312
Before the moe blob invasion anime characters actually had differing features so at a glance you could tell and adult from a teen or a child.
>>1713700
That manga (top left) is drawn really well. I saw a video of hers and the process is time consuming. NTA but I am not that patient.

No. 1713877

>>1713840
Imagine
>mangaka posts doodle instead of detailed masterpiece
>omg japan is falling behind! I feel bad for her. Amateur lol

No. 1713958

>>1713877
You can’t tell the difference between a sketch and finished piece? Yikes.

No. 1713964

does anyone have any tips, resources or places to look for jobs in animation?

i need to learn how to storyboard since that seems to be where a lot of the jobs are but as an autist i dont know how to learn without being handheld what to do for it and it seems like that is where all the jobs are. but I'm having trouble finding actual listings because everything that pops up is indeed but I heard they just steal job listings from websites so it is useless posting or filling out applications there.

No. 1713970

File: 1696287989363.png (364.74 KB, 914x585, MORPHO.png)

>>1713877
not only that but she's factually wrong that japanese animation is getting worse, it's actually getting better for some reason

No. 1713971

>>1713970
oh shit was also going to ask how do you nonnies study anatomy, because i am struggling with that

No. 1714039

>>1713971
Proko's anatomy stuff on YouTube because I'm basic af and new to taking anatomy seriously

No. 1714049

File: 1696295180565.png (885.97 KB, 1216x993, IMG_0380.png)

>>1713616
I’ve seen that comparison, terrible bait. the left tweet was from fucking June 2020 when basically every company was virtue-signalling for black people.
If you check the Mcdonalds twitter today, their latest tweet (September 18) is the pikachu happy meal. I scrolled through the media tab for a minute and still haven’t found any virtue-signalling.

No. 1714104

>>1714049
once a tranny cocksucker, always a tranny cocksucker

No. 1714108

>>1714039
Do you just copy or what do you do? I have no idea how to study besides copying the drawings

No. 1714125

File: 1696299901943.webm (2.92 MB, 854x480, anime girl dramatically runnin…)

>Ever since she was young, Komichi Akebi has always adored sailor uniforms, even going so far as to ask her mother to sew one if she succeeds in getting into her mother's alma mater, Roubai Academy. And thus, when she gets accepted into the prestigious school, Komichi is ecstatic. However, much to her surprise, the middle school no longer uses sailor uniforms as its dress code—making Komichi stand out from her schoolmates. Despite this, Komichi is granted permission to continue wearing the traditional attire.
>With renewed confidence, Komichi meets fascinating classmates as they experience school life together. Under the colorful shower of blossoming prospects, an exciting tomorrow awaits them!

How the fuck do you cope nonny? knowing that some generic ass CGDCT that doesnt even have a gimmick like ''cgdct but….insert hobby'' got a manga and an anime adaptation with this level of animation? it always made me sad that Japanese artists can come up with the most retarded, boring, overdone idea ever and get to publish a manga and later get an anime adaptation. Is it even possible to achieve anything but vague internet fame from being a western comic artist?. It makes me so fucking depressed to think about it. I feel like I have been sabotaged for being born outside Japan as an artist. I can only aspire to develop some western fanbase that's probably going to cancel me the second i dont choke on tranny dick. It's so demoralizing.

No. 1714235

>>1714125
Isn't this the braindead"wholesome" anime with the schoolgirl fingernail clipping and foot sniffing? Shit like this gets and keeps audiences because scrote weebs and otaku are fascinated by crossing their fetishistic obsessions with their idea of purity. Also, this clip looks impressive until you realize the animation is still choppy and full of shortcuts and effects to make it look better than it actually is. I've never seen this show but I guarantee the animation quality tanks the second there isn't a teenage girl's body to focus on. Japan's anime industry lives by constantly churning out flavor-of-the-month shit for a fast turnaround. It's all about squeezing money out of the audience. I'd be surprised if this episode took more than a week to animate.

French and Belgian animation mogs the fuck out of the best Japanese anime anyway. And their stuff isn't made using sweatshop animators living in crowdfunded tenements, earning less than 15yo konbini clerks while working twice the hours.

No. 1714246

File: 1696306261530.jpg (598.95 KB, 1080x2190, Screenshot_20231002_211010_Dis…)

Robaato trying to fight the artist who they hired on to do the pokemon movie lol RJ Palmer

No. 1714247

File: 1696306309727.jpg (415.81 KB, 1080x2190, Screenshot_20231002_211024_Dis…)

>>1714246
Robaato_art is notorious for never, ever meeting deadlines then blames everyone else every time.

No. 1714250

>>1714246
>>1714247
moid on moid callout will never not be funny

No. 1714254

>>1714125
>Is it even possible to achieve anything but vague internet fame from being a western comic artist?. It makes me so fucking depressed to think about it.
It's tough but comics is hell for creators no matter the nationality, so if you're in it for fame and not sheer love you're wasting your time. You could get your work adapted into a TV show like the walking dead, or look at more recent animation projects like Vivziepop's work and Lackadaisy have gotten. Homestuck is a multimedia project and more than simply a comic but does (despite all the setbacks and bullshit) have video games and a huge fanbase. You could pivot from comics into animation like Jhonen Vasquez did.

No. 1714262

>>1714254
i know its not easy even in Japan, but it at least feels like there is hope… i guess i will just upload my comic for myself and block the trannies that will eventually follow

No. 1714276

>>1714125
>Quality animation
>Anime girl "dramatic running"
That first person run cycle of the first few seconds looks like a spastic with chronic multiple sclerosis. Anime shit is thoroughly in need of touching grass if anyone thinks that's what running looks like in the first person, whether it's a underaged teenage girl or a full grown pedofile man running. What good is any animation if it's all for the fetish of pedofile males? Don't stress over this anon, the most egregious thing about this is that such pedofile shit is normalized.

No. 1714282

>>1714276
Its obviously supposed to be exaggerated, the whole anime is "overanimated" . I dont care if its pedophile shit or whatever it enrages me that if this pedo could have an anime series i could have too….if the west wasn't so shit

No. 1714294

>>1714262
it's taken years if not decades of dedication for most successful mangaka to reach that level. And while the success levels for western comic artists doesn't necessarily lead to shows, it still takes similar time to build a following. the japanese manga to magazine and anime pipeline is much more steady, and their market is healthier to a degree, but you have to remember japan's insane work culture and hours.

No. 1714385

this thread is so full of stinky weebs lmao(shitposting)

No. 1714395

>>1714294
True, I feel like the way they release comics wouldn't even work in other countries. Not only because the demand is lower in general but also because it would be impossible to find people who are willing to make 20-30 pages bi-monthly or monthly to have them published in a magazine. But it's not like western webcomics won't go anywhere, isn't Lore Olympus about to get an animated show despite the comic being trash? Just make simple slop based on something that people are already familiar with and make it look appealing. Also continue working on it. A lot of comics are started and abandoned after a few months, but if you push through you're bound to get readers

No. 1714407

File: 1696326221793.png (2.06 MB, 1200x2300, fuckrjpalmer.png)

>>1714246
I'm a pokemon fan so sorry for sperging out but RJ Palmer ruined the live action movie for me with his super shit gritty "real life" takes on pokemon that completely miss the fucking point of the designs and what makes pokemon appealing. He even influenced them to male squirtle act like a stupid waddling toddler and treecko a motionless gecko staring at you through the window. That's not how those pokemon look nor act, they're agile intelligent fighters like wtf I swear he's not even a pokemon fan and hiring was a huge mistake

he's the embodiment of pre-sonic of the sonic design controversy

No. 1714413

File: 1696326950449.png (644.36 KB, 1168x921, vee.png)

Do any of you know about this? I saw someone unrelated talk about this person getting "literally killed" by antis because they got her fired from her animation job(?)which made her spiral, but I can't find much more info because she seems to have moved accounts. The account is full of degeneracy, to the point where it feels like some kind of joke, so I can imagine why this stuff could get her fired if she was working on a kids show or something

No. 1714433

>>1714413
>25yr old child
>chronically online
>who woulda thought
We are hitting retard levels we haven't seen also , I remember her totally angst vent comics she lost her career over kiddie ships kek how embarrassing

No. 1714452

>>1714433
Interesting, are they still available somewhere? I feel kind of sorry for her because she seems genuinely mentally ill and I understand the stress that callouts cause, but why was she posting that shit in the first place when it can be connected to her real name and job?

No. 1714455

File: 1696333992778.png (233.47 KB, 1800x800, 0iokdfjdiz877teih.png)

>>1714413
I don't know why they were called antis, seems like it's just the worst friendgroup to be in

No. 1714468

>>1714455
Because they (the friends) made it into a pro/anti thing to get other people to throw tomatoes and harass her. It all just seems like a weird way of punishing her for not joining in their in-group drama.
I know the shipping stuff is degen, but I honestly feel bad for her for the same reasons as the other anon. She is not mentally stable. All the scrotes in the animation industry draw the same things as her or worse, and/or deliberately put their fetishes in children's shows (even some women are like that, like Rebecca Sugar). Kyle didn't do the whole callout on her because he was "so concerned and uncomfortable", by the way. He's just an obese, male Regina George with a personal axe to grind.
Biggest mistakes were talking to mentally ill "fans" on Discord, and letting her shipping stuff be public.

No. 1714510

>>1709204
?Why are so many teens furries now?
I've thought about this myself because even though I'm in my 30s, I've noticed that there are a lot of teens into the furry fandom and it's wild to me since when I was a teen on the internet back in the early 2000s, it was no where near as common to see furries. My guess is just well, social media. Teenagers are on sites like Amino and Twitter and furry art is bountiful on these platforms that teens spend their time on.

No. 1714518

>>1714413
Don't know anything about this but
>calls self 25-year-old child
>incest
>lolishota
I feel like if you draw any of these things, you should be blacklisted from making animations targeted toward kids regardless. I don't care if it's elements in a story you're making, that's fine, but if you have a twitter where you unabashedly talk about liking kids while trying to get into an industry geared towards children, then you're disgusting

No. 1714520

Nonnas, I have something I wanna get off my chest, just a bit of salt but I'm sick of popular artist cliques, seeing the same people on my feed and their rabid adoring fans.

I'll be the first to admit jealousy, but looking into what they do, and going so far as pledging to some of their patreon pages to study them for a month, I'm not doing anything different to what they are doing. I just want people to read my comics about my OCs nonnas, I just want to be well off and I'm tired of popular artists being uppity about who they outwardly like and follow and deign to reply to. I know it's a trust thing and once you hit a certain amount of people, you have to be careful. Part of me is glad social media is crumbling so you don't see as much of this bullshit anyway. I don't need commentary about logging off/not worrying about shit. I do plenty of that already. I just wanted to vent about how insular and stupid it all is.

No. 1714521

So as an artist who is not about the gender bullshit and has no patience for it but wants to start a new art account on Twitter and possibly try to make new friends, is it possible to find some success and/or make friends online as an artist who actually doesn't validate troons and non-binary? I'm a bit hesitant to take the plunge because I know that gender ideology has infected and plagued many of the online art world.

I don't intend to talk about gender critical stuff on my page, at least not a lot safe for maybe sharing a few things some radfems on Twitter post about ridiculous things being said by troons though I also want to make it clear that I don't validate "preferred" pronouns neither.

I'm just curious is all because it does sound like social suicide lol.

No. 1714523

>>1714521
just say youre esl thatll save you(i did the same kek)

No. 1714529

>>1714518
>>1714413
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XdfUJyVYhmaahTfbxLNU0W0yVz80hmptNrCQv7KSL6o/mobilebasic#h.l2kedg24dua
She gets into the drama here. Warning anons that it's long, but comprehensive and as screenshots.
@Atherist is her main account

No. 1714537

>>1713308
It's just an ad. If it's not your cup of tea, that's fine. It's fine to me tbh. not outstanding, just fine.

No. 1714542

>>1714529
Holy shit, that Jera discord drama is insane, these people are all unwell. Making a note to myself to never join any servers

No. 1714552

>>1714529
>it all circles back to proship vs. antiship drama
modern internet fandoms were a mistake

No. 1714555

>>1714413
About her getting fired from her job, I have to say she reaps what she sowed. Who would openly talk about liking lolisho, incest etc on a public Twitter account? Not just her, but everyone in general need to be more mindful about what they post on social media since just in a few minutes your boss can find your account (everything is connected: emal, phone, old links…) and the reverse, anyone with your acc can find where you work/your identity. Twitter has locked/private accounts for something.

No. 1714570

>>1714552
And the pro/anti discourse circles back to disliking someone and needing a reason to make others hate them too

No. 1714588

>>1714407
They were going to have a sonic situation without him. Him and tyson did better than studios could. He didn't run it lol having a hyper realistic pokemon movie was a mistake to begin with, but without these 2 artists it would be like an 80s creature feature. Also RJ did the art/concepts. He wasn't a lead, just worked in the movie as a creative consultant/concept artist and designer. He didn't tell the riggers how to animate or the studios how to use his designs.

No. 1714610

>>1714555
I mean plenty of male industry artists can do that shit without ever getting shit on for it. Unless men get the same consequences, it's over the top.

No. 1714634

>>1714555
Male artists on the Rugrats drew child porn of the characters as a haha funny joke. The fact is, men will NEVER be held to the same standards as women. John K is a literal abuser but Ren and Stimpy will never not be praised among the moids. JK Rowling is the worse woman in the world for stating her opinion (and not abusing anyone) Not defending this artist's degen interests, but the moid who went after her had ulterior motives. Can assure you he wasn't "DEEPLY uncomfortable" at all.

No. 1714638

File: 1696348736461.jpg (11.62 KB, 275x274, 1648171301432.jpg)

>>1714634
>discovered that the creator of Ren and Stimpy was a fucking pedo
>Steven King basically wrote CP in the book 'It'
>the artists of Spongebob drew porn of the characters behind Nickelodeon's back
>now just discovered that the creators of Rugrats made CP art of the characters, who are BABIES.
Males seem to be incapable of being fucking normal about their creations. Seriously, it's like you can't even trust a male that makes art for "innocent entertainment", because he always has sinister motives behind it. Even when a male makes darker forms of art, he always cranks the edginess higher than it should be by making it just disgusting instead of fascinating. I fucking hate males in anything that has to do with art. Cartoons, portraits, theater, acting, whatever. They always bring their unnecessary degenerate bullshit and can never EVER keep it the fuck away.

No. 1714645

>>1714634
The irony is that most of the hate that jk rowling gets is from women and trannies (abnormal moids) not even regular moids. It's depressing because it basically proves that many women would rather throw one of their own under the bus for a weird mutilated she-scrote. This also applies to pretty much any female creator when she makes a mistake. Even she-ra creator who chopped her own tits and is part of the same fucking camp, she got backlash for accidentally saying something that could be interpreted as being racist, and is despised by multiple trannies and lesbians for making catradora "toxic".

No. 1714661

>>1714645
exactly. they especially hate jkr bc she can't be bullied or silenced or erased. they can't get her fired from her job, they can't sue her into bankruptcy because she's too rich, they can't erase her legacy becuse she had such a huge influence in popular culture and her books are famous all over the world, they can't deplatform her because she's too famous.
the whole TRA movement isn't actually about advocacy. it's just repackaged men's right activism, the only goal is bullying and silencing women. and so she represents the ultimate enemy.

No. 1714670

>>1714638
I don't know why your singling out males. Rebecca Sugar drew worse porn of Ed and Double D than anything Hillenburg did.

No. 1714677

File: 1696350747820.png (623.91 KB, 1100x739, FCB6RVjX0AYu5_r.png)

>>1714634
The guy who fired her from his show did it to save himself, she was just in an unlucky spot because she befriended and then unfriended some mentally ill people over discord that had learned too much about her real life and developed a grudge while not working for people she was friends with that could've shielded her. The other people who call her out also make exceptions for themselves and their friends when they do the same things they like to call others out for, it's insane.

No. 1714682

>>1714670
People just draw porn too. Not all of it has to have secret tendencies hidden. Pretty sure a lot of people drew just "random dick here" at some point.

No. 1714685

>>1714670
Rebecca Sugar seems to be one of those examples of female art degens, but it seems to me that they're still less common than the male ones.

No. 1714731

File: 1696353301166.jpg (654.45 KB, 962x1945, Screenshot_20231003-190908_Sam…)

>>1714588
Nah his coomer ass is the reason they made sonic-"realism"-pokemon instead of making them look cartoony like they usually do but with better texture. I think they made a lot of pokemon look disgusting that would have been cute if they were just themselves but in 3D. I strongly believe barbie as an adaptation made it so big because it exactly captures barbie in real life and isn't a dark disturbing retelling of barbie like 99% of like adaptation movies are now.

No. 1714745

>>1714413
Didnt the faggot that made magi sword try to fuck her and when she refused he doxxed the shit out of her and got her blacklisted?

No. 1714760

File: 1696355082140.jpg (138.69 KB, 836x852, d8wayo1-37e3ef01-e8c5-4bd5-9d3…)

>>1714555
whats funny is that out of all people, its the magisword faggot calling her out, you know the guy with a kids cartoon where the female main character looks like this and all the female characters have boobies for no reason? he's the epitome of that meme where the female character is sexy and the male character is always goofy with a very cartoony design

No. 1714761

>>1714745
Seems like it. He would do things like offer to let her stay at his place before suddenly turning on her.

No. 1714765

>>1714634
The same people that hate Rowling are the same people that defend LOTR and Lovecraft. Women are held at autistically high standars for no reason other than the notion that women are supposed to be ''better than men'' and sexism.

No. 1714768

>>1714670
rebecca sugar drew weird edd ed and eddy porn when she was still a teen, it's not the same as grown ass men drawing porn for a shows they are working on. The rugrats guy actually went to jail for molesting children, and the spongebob porn book has a few pages missing, which makes me think they skipped over all the gross sandy misogynistic porn to save face

No. 1714770

File: 1696355948846.jpg (Spoiler Image,44.08 KB, 728x286, ff8fdbdfd38fdafa00cfab407ff2d8…)

>>1714638
Also, the Loud house guy drew incest shota comics and still got hired by nickelodeon to make a children's cartoon

No. 1714772

>>1714677
>>1714760
God it's suffocating trying to start an art career as a woman. "Successful" art moids think they're entitled to pussy like we're all living in the jungle where tha alpha male gets to have a harem when he wins. It's actually amazing that a lesbian like Noelle got as far as she did in this industry, even if she's gone full gendie now. It's 80% office politics and praising the right males, 20% art.

No. 1714780

>>1714276
pedo shit aside i hate 99% of "good" animation. Yes the animation is smooth but it just looks bad. She moves in a weird way. Animation doesn't have to be realistic but the stylisation looks like shit. It looks like it pains her to move why does she jitter so much? Its obivously animated by talented people but something about it looks so soulless

No. 1714783

File: 1696356459128.png (249.8 KB, 400x300, CLAMP stacies.png)

>>1714772
that's why i envy Japan too. Yes, yes, I know it's misogynistic too, but you aren't really tied to a studio or a clique of people, so you can form your own group with your female friends like CLAMP. A lot of female mangakas work alongside their childhood friends and i find that really sweet, though luck finding a western female artist that isnt delulu into gendie bullshit and a womanchildren with little to none commitment and responsability, though.

No. 1714795

>>1714523
Kek that would be funny. Do you really do this??

No. 1714819

>>1714731
He was a concept artist hired. By the studio. He didn't leverage them to look like this, they planned it to look like this and saught out someone who has adapted versions they were looking for. Even what you posted doesn't support your tinfoil he's to blame.

No. 1714820

In a perfect world, they would fire anyone, male or female, who makes public NSFW art of characters from the kids show they're working on.

No. 1714822

>>1714768
Nta, but why do your cartoon crushes stop being relevant when you turn 18? It's not wrong to ask draw porn of them. They are fiction. You can't say it's okay for kids to draw porn or minor characters but the second they turn 18, no more drawing anything porn you grew up with or your a pedo? This is the whole point of anons explaining why fiction is just fiction. Not everyone who draws porn of childhood characters is in to real children.

No. 1714825

>>1714822
i don't know, maybe i'm in a different boat, but when i come back to characters i had a crush on as a child, i end up no longer liking them. their written maturity is too childlike for me and i end up liking adult characters. i think this is the same for some others who move on to liking older characters instead

No. 1714826

>>1714822
I believe this is only true but for women, anyways i just think its unfair to put rebecca drawing cringe shit as a teen pre-SU to a convicted child abuser. Moids can never keep things in fiction, they always have to go and kill women because they saw it in an horror movie. They should be judged harsher than women for it because there is an actual risk of them hurting people, unlike wome who are just cringe and have the mento illness

No. 1714833

>>1714825
What if you liked older characters as a kid instead and wrote/drew about that instead?

No. 1714859

>>1714822
The same reason your irl crushes stop being relevant as you become an adult. It's not the worst thing in the world to remember your childhood crush fondly but it's definitely weird as shit to be an adult drawing porn of 2D minors

No. 1714863

>>1714859
i dont like my childhood crushes anymore but if i had to settle for ugly husbandos like tumblr sexymans or that richard ramirez guy from spiderverse just ebcause they are the only adult male characters i would off myself, they are so ugly

No. 1714868

>>1714863
>richard ramirez guy from spiderverse
GAH! Kek

No. 1714871

>>1714863
I mean, not all adult male characters look like that though? I didn't say don't have crushes, I just said it's weird to be an adult drawing porn of 2D minors

No. 1714879

File: 1696361507738.jpg (51.67 KB, 415x600, Flippy.600.1618218.jpg)

Why do Japanese artists love to draw every fucking character into looking like some tall, scrawny teenager? I understand it when the character is meant to be young and has that scrawny build, but they do it for characters that are not or wouldn't look like that. I've seen them do it to Eric Cartman in fanart. Felt nostalgic and took a peep at some humanized art of HTF characters, and the Japanese always draw the soldier bear to look like this anorexic eighteen-year-old that can't even lift a machine gun. In what world would a soldier that's strong enough to kill anything look like picrel?

No. 1714882

>>1714871
See this is some shitty logic. You should be able to draw whatever, just because other sexier versions of adults exist doesn't mean now an over 18 person must focus solely. Anons are finally slowly understanding.

No. 1714883

>>1714879
I hate that, I hate how it’s so hard to find artists that can draw appealing characters that just happen to have muscles drawn in a nice way. It’s like handsome characters can’t have muscles, as if there was a strict canon to follow or some shit. I feel this about most of my husbandos that are always drawn like skinny legends or retarded femboys, it’s only a few artists that take a few minutes of their days to draw muscles.

No. 1714886

File: 1696361965266.jpg (186.34 KB, 1193x1070, 67591487_p52.jpg)

>>1714879
i dont know but i think it's charming and funny as fuck, men draw female characters like bimbos with balloon tits let japanese horny women express themselves

No. 1714888

>>1700675
Not into shota but I love kids in animes but can't stand them IRL, and sex-wise I had a tentacle phase and a necrophilia phase the dead moid won't go soft and literally can't hurt you, idk why this isn't more common tbh but there's literally no appeal whatsoever to actual, real tentacled animals or corpses. Fiction is fiction.

No. 1714894

>>1714879
Thin men with bishonen faces are based. Just go look at western art if you want your musclepigs and fat men so much.

No. 1714899

>>1714894
>musclepigs and fat men
I'm just confused as to why japs always draw characters as teenagers with eating disorders when they canonically or would most likely look like the "musclepigs" and "fatasses" you say. I get the style for characters that actually are skinny and young, but then they make characters that are canonically rather ugly, chubby, or strong into that little box and always looks so dumb. It's like looking at fanart of Rose Quartz on the Japanese side of art, and seeing nothing but a super skinny version of her. I get that it's "just art", but it's so bizarre how that particular body type is so shilled.

No. 1714901

>>1714888
Kek this is not normal and you should be ashamed to admit this.

No. 1714903

The slider scale of reference for male bodies ITT is really telling of how limited your tastes are.

No. 1714905

>>1714899
Ignore those people, you can't have a genuine conversation about art here anymore without someone going
>well just go look somewhere else
or
>no matter what women do, men will always be worse
They all cut off any attempts at starting a dialogue
>>1714903
It's probably just the same person from before who believes the only body types for men are either borderline little boy or roidpig
>>1714879
There's some Japanese artists who are really good at drawing other body types, but they don't draw in your typical anime style. Most Japanese people who draw in generic anime don't bother to learn more than a handful of bodytypes in fear of drawing something "ugly" or with too many personal/definable features

No. 1714906

>>1714899
Japanese people tend to like thin bodies more, American people like muscular bodies more. Both groups of people are more likely to draw characters they like in ways they think look good. Beauty standards are just that, it's life.
>It's like looking at fanart of Rose Quartz on the Japanese side of art, and seeing nothing but a super skinny version of her.
Not really, because Flippy is just a cartoon bear with a similar body to the other cartoon animals. Humanization doesn't have to equate to realism, especially when the entire premise is silly, brightly-colored anthropomorphic animals who die and come back alive.

No. 1714909

>>1714905
>>1714903
You seem a bit irate a hyperbolic, half-joking statement about musclepigs and fat men, but are fine with saying a young man with a thin body looks like an "anorexic teenager". Please stop being sensitive and hypocritical, nonnies, it's not as mature as you'd like it to be, kek.

No. 1714910

>>1714899
Honestly that's why I can't get into anime characters that are shilled as attractive. They tend to be the same 3-5 body and face templates in different cosplays, especially in fanart.

No. 1714911

>>1714906
>Not really, because Flippy is just a cartoon bear with a similar body to the other cartoon animals. Humanization doesn't have to equate to realism, especially when the entire premise is silly, brightly-colored anthropomorphic animals who die and come back alive.
Well, that is true. I guess it's my personal taste because when I imagine a soldier that's been in many wars and is strong enough to rip faces off with his bare hands, I don't think of a body type that doesn't look particularly strong.

No. 1714912

>>1714909
Don't know if you're trying to imply we're the same person, but I'm only one of those anons kek, and I'm just weighing in on my opinion. Admittedly so, this conversation is a bit redundant in this thread now though

No. 1714913

>>1714901
Nta, but they're are other dynmanics to this that I'm not going to waste my time explaining to you. I'm with the anon that fiction is fiction. I hope you've never liked a single anthropomorphic character as a child or adult like Beast, Simba, any characters in Beastars or any undead chatacters reanimated and existing. For a lot of older anons, might be Billy from Hocus Pocus. Doesn't mean they want to fuck a corpse or an animal.

No. 1714915

>>1714909
I mean when you catch almost every anime version style of South Park depicting the canonically fatass Eric as a six feet all, super model thin, "bishonen", you get a bit impatient with people who act like anything other than that style is garbage.

No. 1714916

File: 1696363976649.jpg (116.74 KB, 600x536, 102095985_p46.jpg)

>>1714899
why do you wanna police how people draw eric cartman of all things? who cares? its fanart, people are allowed to interpret characters however they want

No. 1714917

>>1714915
I get that, but it's another thing to imply that women who find bishonens attractive like underage boys.

No. 1714918

>>1714913
Agreed, the "um the fictional character you like is problematic" thing is a waste of time. Are we going to make cartoons real? Is there any chance of someone on Twitter jumping into the screen, canonically having sex with the cartoon character and altering the course of the story? No? Then why should I give a fuck

No. 1714919

>>1714915
More men should be fat-shamed and have their representation erased from the public sphere.

No. 1714921

>>1714916
Just like with drawing chubby or muscular characters as super skinny, and super skinny characters as obese, I think it's weird when people stray so far from what that character looks like, or most likely would look like. If you're gonna draw a character, but change soooo many things about that character's appearance, why even draw them at all? It's like when westoids draw Junko Enoshima as this really fat, deeply dark-skinned girl instead of, you know, how she actually looks.

No. 1714922

>>1714917
Samefag as >>1714905 but I was talking about one anon in particular, not everyone
>>1714918
I mean, if you like something controversial, you should at least get a backbone when people admit they don't like it.

No. 1714928

>>1714922
>I mean, if you like something controversial, you should at least get a backbone when people admit they don't like it.
What do you mean by "get a backbone"? Anyone can like or dislike anything. I'm just confused on why it's important, because some people seem to make it their entire life to be hopping mad about strangers online liking some cartoon they don't like or think is controversial. At the end of the day, it all comes down to "I don't like it" or "I like it", and you can't argue someone into changing their own personal taste. Just seems pointless.

No. 1714929

>>1714921
we are talking about anime humanizations they are already as far away from canon as they could be, kek

No. 1714932

>>1714922
I'm moreso referring to all the muscly/hypermasculine man fans who accuse any woman who likes bishonens/feminine anime men of being pedo/ephebophiles

No. 1714934

>>1714917
Then I suppose I did exaggerate, and I take it back. I still feel like the model-thin body type being forced on characters that just aren't is still rather silly to look at.

No. 1714935

File: 1696364941472.jpg (50.6 KB, 564x670, cf6929cb0a3ca0bc0c0cdebcb798bf…)

>>1714929
I think it's like taking Po from Kung Fu Panda and making him a human twink; it just doesn't make sense
>>1714928
Yeah it is all opinions based. There's just many anons itt that take it as a personal attack when people don't like a very obviously controversial theme in art
>>1714932
Don't think anyone in this thread is doing that, but I do agree that that's pretty stupid

No. 1714936

>>1714912
Wasn't implying you were the same person, just responding to both of you. It's just kind of weird to be fine with insulting other women's tastes and low-key calling them pedos, but then get bothered at something as small as the word "musclepig".

No. 1714938

>>1714882
I'm sorry that it's weird as shit to be an adult drawing porn of characters that are depicted as minors, but it is. Nothing wrong with drawing minors, I just think you're a weirdo if you're compelled to draw porn of characters that are depicted as minors.

No. 1714942

>>1714906
Rose quartz from Steven universe is a humanized female being so it's also weird to change her character design like that. It's like, just draw skinny characters then..

No. 1714944

>>1714936
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit, no one's mad at the word roidpig and I never called them a pedo. Love yourself

No. 1714949

>>1714944
Only you said "roidpig", and I never said you personally called anyone a pedo. You're clearly so bothered you've surpassed poor reading comprehension and jumped staight to illiteracy. You are entitled to an obesity fetish, nobody's judging. Just stop malding at other women for not liking the same, hope that helps.

No. 1714951

>>1714938
what about people drawing jotaro lewds

No. 1714960

>>1714521
I can tell you that I don't engage. I literally post what I want and don't even touch the gendie topics. Yeah they follow me but I don't really interact much outside of limited commentary. I don't even have my gender in my bios anywhere. At the end of the day literally no one cares unless you make it an issue. And if someone else tries to make it an issue you ignore them like moids do. You shouldn't fear posting if you aren't giving them any ammo to begin with. And if your goal is to just post your art, that's just about anyone is going to care about anyway. Good luck nona!

No. 1714967

>>1714395
lore olympus follows the plot of sexy billionaire romances with a tumblr appealing artstyle and I'm surprised more western artists don't fill this niche. It gets a lot of hate and made fun of like those kinds of romance novels but they keep raking in the dough.

No. 1714968

>>1714929
Literally. Furry characters drawn as human is so up to personal interpretation and taste, it's a non-issue. Imagine if someone got mad over a humanized Donald Duck wearing pants or not having webbed feet.

No. 1714970

>>1714960
NTA but depending on the type of art, especially if you draw fanart, someone will eventually ask or comment on some fanart you made like calling the guy a woman instead because they think he's "totally trans." If you draw subjects that are more niche or not humanoid focused at all like landscapes, you have little to worry about.

>>1714521
For OG nonna, just don't talk about gender at all and avoid anyone with a shit ton of descriptors in their bio or characters that are common to be transwashed like Yamato from One Piece or Naoto from Persona. I've met at least one other woman that I talk to sometimes about our mutual interest and there seems to be no interest for gender topics at all from her. Good luck!

No. 1714972

>>1714833
This has been me, as a kid and teen I crushed on adult characters who even in a fantasy world wouldn't (and shouldn't) look at me twice, and now when I come back to them that disconnect doesn't exist anymore to interrupt kek

No. 1714976

>>1714951
They're also weird unless it's like the versions where he's an adult because he eventually does become one naturally. Like when people draw lewds of teen and kid Naruto when the adult one is right fuckin there

No. 1714980

>>1714976
The adult Naruto sucks. A lot of people do prefer the hyper active version that more fun and giddy on purpse because its endearing. Not because they want to fuck the child version. Minor characters are always, always depicted with bigger personalities. That's why people like those characters and why so much story revolves around them.

No. 1714982

>>1714780
Nta but I totally agree. So many anime out there are animated weirdly and I hate the unnatural movements and body language, which is unfortunate because usually the way it looks visually speaking is nice and has nice colors and clean lines etc. but the movements can ruin it. Western animation suffers less from this but has the opposite issue with the designs and colors not being that good, especially in 3D or flash animation. Hand drawn will always be the best.

No. 1714983

>>1714982
Have you not seen the messy shortcuts outside of squash and stretch in 2d animation in the west? Anons really have no idea what you're talking about.

No. 1714985

>>1714915
i consider art like to basically be gijinkas but of already human characters.

No. 1714987

>>1714820
Fr. And fire anyone who makes "adult jokes" in kids shows because imo that's retarded. And the "it's for the parents!" excuse doesn't work, my parents turned the tv off and yelled at me to go to my room whenever an adult joke played in a kids show, because sane parents know better to not let their kids be exposed to adult themes at a young age. Early porn exposure fetish and all that.

No. 1714990

>>1714863
Nta but just don't watch shit modern cartoons and video games, plus don't take tumblr's opinions on what's hot because they're all retarded. Watch shows you like and crush on characters you genuinely like. That's what I do and I'm happy with my current husbandos, all hot adult males from cartoons aimed at older kids and teenagers that I used to love as a kid.

No. 1714993

>>1714935
Ot and nta but this fan art is very adorable! Who's the artist? Do they have a pixiv or deviantart? I want to see their interpretation of the rest of the group lol

No. 1714996

>>1714983
What do you mean? Sorry I don't know what you're referring to. I'm not an artist or that deep in the animation discourse, I just like reading the rants and discussions here.

No. 1715002

>>1714996
Your critique is exactly why I said squash and stretch. You have no actual professional basis around what you're talking about. Japan is known for shitty shortcuts in animation all the time, in fact, it tends to get pointed out consistently more than Western animation when it comes to drawing 2D, especially frames. I'm not going to spend my time explaining everything, but if you think Japanese animation is superior somehow, you need a reality check. Both have strengths and weaknesses based on who is animating and the company, but neither is better than the other. Also the anon mentioning jittering that you replied to has no idea what actual jittering is in animation.

No. 1715003


No. 1715014

>>1715002
Oh, I see. But I still like the way anime looks on average compared to a western show, and western shows that look decent usually have anime influence on them. But at the end of the day they all outsource to korea and china, and some even outsource to india for 3D stuff so whatever.

No. 1715015

>>1715003
Thanks!

No. 1715016

>>1714949
You're the only one malding kek roidpig, musclepig, no one cares, they're all the same thing. You said "low-key calling them pedos" and now are claiming people have an obesity fetish. Sorry someone insulted your type in anime boys I guess
>>1714987
It's insane. What's even more crazy is why so many kids shows are centered around toilet humor and butt/twerking jokes. Teen Titans Go especially had this problem

No. 1715017

>>1715016
Take your meds, seriously. Only crazy people get this pissy over nothing.

No. 1715019

>>1715017
The call is coming from inside the house retard

No. 1715021

>>1715019
What a pathetic response.

No. 1715022

>>1714990
Exactly. Ignore all hype, fandoms are cancerous. Consume only what appeals to you and be happy.

No. 1715027

>>1715021
because it wasn't even a discussion to begin with lol you were only assuming people were arguing against you, and then calling people who told you you were wrong out for malding

No. 1715028

>>1714783
Agreed, I think Japan has more of a base "friend group" (as in actual friends, not nepo stuff and politics) culture when it comes to passion-related work like manga. It doesn't feel forced with them.

>>1714921
This is just kind of autistic, maybe log off. It's fan art for a reason.

No. 1715030

>>1715027
I don't even know what you're talking about. It just sounds like you got offended at something random, and revived an infight from hours ago to rage more. "Roidpig" or "musclepig" or whatever are not slurs, and not every anon is whoever you've been arguing with for weeks.

No. 1715033

>>1714901
>uwu most embarrassing behavior!
go join a church

No. 1715041

>>1715033
Seriously, that anon would never come here again if she knew about Ko-chan, or just looked at some of the threads in /g/.

No. 1715058

>>1714879
You just reminded me of the Flaky gender debate I was way too invested in as a teen. It was obvious to me she was a girl but I didn’t like when most gijinkas made her so girly because I read her as more of a tomboy. I know now that the Japanese artists just want to make their art cute and don’t care about being 100% accurate and they also draw characters in the Japanese ideal. That’s why they draw fat characters skinny or dark skinned characters lighter. The deliberately making her gender confusing and the pandering to fans shit in HTF was retarded, I guess they found the fan fighting over if Flaky was male or female funny. Today they’d use the same reasons as to why people were confused about her gender, her design not being pink or having eyelashes, to be a reason why she’s actually a tranny or gendie.

No. 1715060

>>1715058
>I know now that the Japanese artists just want to make their art cute and don’t care about being 100% accurate and they also draw characters in the Japanese ideal.
This. So many western people online seem unable to wrap their heads around this even today, lmao.

No. 1715080

>>1715033
More like go back to twitter

No. 1715086

>>1714990
>all hot adult males from cartoons aimed at older kids
can you give examples? because most modern cartoons have such a repelling style i cannot imagine unironically liking them, let alone wanting to fuck the characters

No. 1715101

>>1714125
This is probably a showpiece trailer they put their money into and the actual anime looks like dogshit. Happens all the time. But that said, yeah, I haven't watched anime in years because of this. It's not worth it, it's either CGDT or some shitty isekai/villainess/romcom that only relies on fanservice and scrote pandering. And I'm not saying this to be an edgy contrarian because I love anime, but the industry has completely lost all the dignity it once had.

>it always made me sad that Japanese artists can come up with the most retarded, boring, overdone idea ever and get to publish a manga and later get an anime adaptation.

Only now it doesn't even have to be a manga, most of them are light novel adaptations and straight out clones of an idea that has been regurgitated every single season for the past 2 years.

>I feel like I have been sabotaged for being born outside Japan as an artist.

I feel this a lot, anon. I sometimes want to punch a wall thinking about how unfair it is that some scrote in Japan created a lazy, shitty light novel about ogling a girl's boobs that reads like it was generated by a poorly worded chatgpt query yet scored fully animated adaptation out of it, a possibility every weeb on the planet can only dream of. I'm not even from the US so I have even less of a chance to gain any sort of a step beyond making a digital comic, and even if I was, it's next to impossible to get a decent animated show if you're not Noelle Stevenson or a boomer moid who worked on The Simpsons once.

No. 1715109

>>1714879
>This post
Was I transported back to 2005 or something? Anon sperging about "everyone only drawing scrawny twinks!!!" and Happy Tree Friends fanart? Go to /co/ to jerk off to your precious hypermuscular space marines.

No. 1715139

>>1715109
>Go to /co/ to jerk off to your precious hypermuscular space marines.
KEK

No. 1715142

File: 1696378987487.webm (2.66 MB, 854x480, overanimated anime girl.webm)

>>1715101
>This is probably a showpiece trailer they put their money into and the actual anime looks like dogshit.
I dont know why some of you are so salty at this fucking anime looking so good, kek. The anime is animated beautifully, and it has like 10 pages on Sakugabooru. For reference, kimi no na wa only has 5 pages. I don't know why but there has been an explosion of boring CGDCT with extremely polished and well done animation. Outside of pic rel there is also onimai and the new IM@S anime. Thank good that sakugabooru exists, so I don't have to watch boring anime only for the SAKUGA.

No. 1715151

>>1715142
Posters here are salty because very good animation was wasted on softcore pedophile fapping material.

No. 1715152

>>1715151
Samefag. Legit, smelling toenail bits? Leg length competitions? The manga was so obviously written by a man. I fucking hate it when men write anything involving teenage girls. They should all castrate themselves than do that shit.

No. 1715153

>>1715151
Yeah, i am salty too, but it's retarded to be like ''reee it isnt even good reee its shit'' when it's objectively really good animation. I though Japan was running out of money, so i am kinda amazed at how literal CGDCT shit is able to get such quality of animation. I imagine at this point the anime industry is completly run by passion-driven otakus who just want to draw cute girls.

No. 1715158

>>1714468
Exactly.

Even though the account was public, they only knew it was hers because she told them about it privately. You can argue whether that is a good or bad idea but if the first thing you do about being told about something in confidence is to go and tell other people- nevermind all the other shit that followed- that should be the first sign you are an untrustworthy piece of shit lawl

oh yeah and all this spiraled from someone not wanting to fuck someone. If Ang didn't draw porn that literally every other dude and woman in animation does or has done in some point. This is really just weaponizing pro/anti-ship content and tbh as long as your content isn't directly tied to your job or work draw whatever porn you want on the side it doesn't matter.

The only time you should lose your job is if you hurt someone else or if it is publically tied to that specific brand. But creating under a public alias that people only knew about because you told them in confidence? Should be fair game to do whatever you want.

oh and… all this from not wanting to fuck someone. It wasn't about protecting the children it was at the end of the day about an ego

No. 1715188

>>1715186
kek omg nooo she drew two characters kissing she's literally a child molester

No. 1715195

>>1714768
She also drew Marceline kissing Finn, which was well into her professional career. Yeah comparing her to convicted pedophiles is a bit much but so are your examples. Stephen King was literally bleeding cocaine, and the whole thing independent of that part reads like a weird schizo dream. However your Hillenburg example is the weirdest and most out of place. What makes what he did any more different than what Rebecca Sugar did? None of the characters in Spongebob are children anyway? Why are you extrapolating on "missing pages"?

No. 1715198

>>1715188
see>>1715195

No. 1715204

>>1714768
Also what's the name of the Rugrats guy? I can't find info on any Rugrats creator going to jail.

No. 1715206


No. 1715241

>>1715152
I only ever saw disconnected manga pages on Pinterest and thought the art was not only cute, but really competent; how delicate the girls were, the wrinkles in the clothes, the different poses. Then I actually read the manga and one of the very first chapters was the toenail clipping scene. What the fuck. Previously I thought that maybe the artist liked drawing CGDCT the same way someone loves to obsessively draw skateboarding maids in ankle-length dresses but after that fucking scene, you just couldn't read the manga without seeing a thin pedo veneer smeared all over it.

No. 1715246

>>1715206
since people are saying he's the creator, he isn't a creator but he did direct several episodes.

No. 1715261

>>1715246
i wasnt the retard saying he was the creator though, i said he was an storybaorder.

No. 1715264

File: 1696389272996.jpg (622.15 KB, 1536x2048, [22-06-15] 1537084399111483392…)

>>1715241
same, i almost got tricked into watching/reading it because the style seemed very feminine. He has that japanese AGP style, like hisashi eguchi.

No. 1715289

>>1715264
Japanese agp style completely captures the essence of cute though so its forgivable

No. 1715296

File: 1696391990237.jpg (385.82 KB, 1280x1801, tumblr_mj9z0zXkuC1ql7lmbo4_128…)

>>1715289
kek, agreed. it's funny how you can tell when a japanese author is agp, they have a weirdly cutesy style that doesn't feel too sexual at first glance.

No. 1715325

>>1714413
This whole drama makes sense once you realise a large proportion of the people who made call outs on here were TIMs or teenage girls

No. 1715366

>>1715142
>>1715153
Jesus this thread is so infested by moids it's unreal.

No. 1715375

>>1714879
Actually the new trend is to draw husbandos with massive pecs…

No. 1715383

>>1715366
>everyone that disagrees with me is a moid
The animation is nice even if it's not up to your snob standars, way more than a shitty CGDCT anime deserves

No. 1715384

>>1715375
I hate when they draw pecs like boobs, it's so disgusting

No. 1715388

>>1715375
It's just more troon projection. A few years ago it was all the rage for them to draw their husbandos with pinched waists, zippertits and hairy cunts. Now it's all about flab and pecs that look like ovoid Eiken teats rather than actual moid pectorals.

No. 1715394

why do all porn artists fucking suck at drawing. just absolutely garbage at making appealing/erotic art. idk

No. 1715396

>>1715394
When you're addicted to porn and having an orgasm all the time, it kind of takes your brain away from everything else, including focusing properly on any art skill.

No. 1715406

I love drawing sexy males I love drawing their cute faces contorted in pleasure, their impossibly sexy bodies, perfectly sculpted cocks… nonnies….

No. 1715409

>>1715406
How can i be like you… how do i get better at drawing hot guys. please… its so hard.

No. 1715415

>>1715406
nonnie living her best life

No. 1715426

>>1715409
I’m so horny for sexy men 24/7 I am drawing them and thinking about them all day, I am highly motivated. But my practical advice is that I study a lot of classic capcom artists.
>>1715415
I love my life I love existing.

No. 1715440

File: 1696416178805.png (935.54 KB, 1011x897, jackie_reallife_drawing.png)

Maybe I'm oversensitive as someone who has been both overweight and has had a ED + body dysmorphia, but if an artist drew me as significantly larger than I am and posted for everyone to see I may literally have killed myself in pure terror and humiliation. I hope those girls either never find out or that they have such high confidence it doesn't bother them.

No. 1715441

File: 1696416231425.jpg (162.72 KB, 553x989, 0a5603a59d3620f79e4e16fc23908f…)

>>1715426
But how do you draw perfectly sculpted cocks? Real cocks aren't very perfect looking…
Picture unrelated

No. 1715444

File: 1696416750784.png (334.59 KB, 701x630, Screenshot_20231004-115138_Bra…)

>>1715440
hahahaha… foul

No. 1715449

>>1715086
I'm talking about older cartoons, not modern ones. And no I can't give an example because they're too niche and I posted about some of them before and I don't wanna end up avatarfagging accidentally.

No. 1715450

>>1715440
she drew them as if a coomer would disgusting hopefully they never find this

No. 1715451

>>1715440
never thought i would see a fat fetish female artist. really weird to make people fatter than they are.

No. 1715453

>>1715444
it's like she doesn't realize being a large girl can be "traumatic" and having someone point it out, highlight and exaggerate it is pretty much just bullying even if she herself thinks she's just making silly cartoons. Using real people and putting like 1% blur on the face as if that makes the person unrecognizable seems so rude too

No. 1715454

>>1715440
>>1715451
muh exaggeration and stylization

No. 1715461

>>1715289
>Moid art
>Forgivable

No. 1715462

>>1715441
Long and smooth, a bit of a curve on the belly. Ideal head to shaft proportion is ~5-6 “heads” tall (lol). The glans should be round, nice cleaved chestnut shape. A modest slope to his corona. The frenulum and foreskin are important as well, most of your time rendering should be spent here. One thing I find that makes cocks especially aesthetic is making this area more red in hue compared to the glans, which is a bit more purple. His balls gotta be nice, smooth, and weighty while still looking supple and suitable for a slapping.
Cocks gotta be leaky and shiny too, dripping with excessive precum to show his desperation. In the same vein, it’s necessary to show the man’s face looking broken in pleasure (but never make him ugly, as a male’s face is also always meant to be beautiful for the audience to admire). It’s important to show both his throbbing cock alongside with what it is doing to him mentally. That’s eroticism.

I need to draw a sexy man getting his perky ass slapped and shooting loads of thick sperm right now.

No. 1715463

>>1715462
Damn nona, I really want to see your art of hot men with slappable balls!

No. 1715471

>>1715463
i'm sure nona's drawings are great, but it would be so funny if her art skills were terrible after that detailed description

No. 1715480

>>1715471
I have been drawing sexy males for the majority of my time on Earth. My power will only continue to grow.

No. 1715482

>>1715480
Kek. Please join us on the doodle board sometime, anonita.

No. 1715488

>>1715142
I'm sorry but, do people really think this is cute and well-done? The frames may be well-rendered but the movement is choppy and nonsensical. Look at when the girl ties up her hair, I literally can't tell what kind of movement the arms are supposed to be doing. They're moving but it looks like the girl is having a seizure and she can't remember how to tie her hair. They spend so much time on the clothing folds and hair strands but the animation itself isn't very good.

No. 1715495

>>1712936
I have recently started requiem vampire knight, and it is good

No. 1715496

File: 1696423112855.jpg (24.4 KB, 192x280, 1680533284911.jpg)

>>1715463
>men with slappable balls!
KEK I died

No. 1715497

File: 1696423116101.jpeg (191.27 KB, 735x1032, 110fa072-633f-459a-ae6b-c4ae22…)

>>1715495
Forgot picrel

No. 1715507

>>1715480
Damn I wish I could draw hot men all the time. Instead I have to draw commissions of ugly genderspecial ocs…

No. 1715523

>>1715507
Same nona.
The men I draw looks good but only in two angles and with 3 hours of just tweaking the face ugh

No. 1715527

File: 1696426181139.png (62.82 KB, 300x250, image_2023-10-05_002839755.png)


No. 1715530

>>1715497
seconding requiem vampire knight,, its really nice and interesting.

No. 1715537

File: 1696426888039.gif (9.07 MB, 498x280, luck-and-logic-anime-girl.gif)

>>1715488
Yeah, it reminded me of this gif kek I'm sure every frame looks good by itself but the movement is too much to be natural. Also what the fuck is that bit with her strand in her mouth?

No. 1715560

>>1715507
I am in a fortune position in which I can dedicate hours of my day to my craft and passion.
>>1715527
Men should be drawn in such a way where the viewer made subconsciously aware he is a merely a flesh piston to deliver countless cock strokes to his wife. Nothing is more an appealing than a man with thick quads and a tight ass (the anatomical center of cock propulsion). I study anatomy obsessively to draw his fuck muscles.
It’s my goal as an artist to send the world a message that men exist to be pleasure objects.

No. 1715578

File: 1696430002734.jpg (197.91 KB, 1000x1250, 22272401.jpg)

I'm sorry guys let me just rant a bit. W.I.T.C.H. was one of my favorite series growing up and the one thing that I appreciated the most was the lovely art but the style of the reboot is so damn lackluster… I know the og style had an anime influence but it still looked unique! And obviously the anatomy was better, the coloring was better, the rendering was better. This drawing might work for fanart but for a published edition it sucks. The composition in particular throws me off, it looks awkward and cheap. I also don't like the way their faces are drawn, just taking away all the character. A big point of W.I.T.C.H. was that every girl looked unique. Also Taranee's pose really fucking bothers me. I'm not saying this particular artist is bad it's just that this doesn't hold to the same standard

No. 1715579

File: 1696430106093.jpeg (24.11 KB, 499x500, KPOP_HIP-HOP_RNB INTERRACIAL I…)

>>1715560
>flesh piston
>supple, slapable balls
kekkkk this is why I keep coming back to this imageboard

No. 1715582

>>1715578
I think this looks super cute

No. 1715583

>>1715406
>>1715426
Yeah ok I'll hide this thread now

No. 1715591

>>1715578
you are totally right anon. my other gripe with the reboot apart from the the blandness of the style (in comparison) is why did they suck all the life out of them ? they look like dull ghosts, bring the tan back ! ugh i hate it. it's not an interesting artstyle but it's not really ugly either which honestly makes me more upset

No. 1715593

>>1715578
Whos that girl with white hair? I don't remember her.

No. 1715595

>>1715560
Have you considered doing requests in the /g/ husbando thread?

No. 1715601

>>1715595
I’ve never considered it before but now I am.
>>1715579
Thank you for your appreciation.
>>1715583
You reject my vision now but one day you will reflect on my words and realize I am right.

No. 1715602

>>1715591
It's just a very average artstyle that doesn't stand out. It's not offensive, but kinda stiff. And yes, they made a lot of changes to their personality and switched some things around, Taranee is now a mean jock, Cornelia is woobified and Hay Lin is the nerd ugh… also Will is an actual ginger now and took away her tan. The redesigns are pretty generic too. Taranee is probably the biggest offense to me personally

No. 1715605

File: 1696431468898.jpeg (1.17 MB, 1170x1606, IMG_6385.jpeg)

>>1715578
I find Taranees style cuter in the reboot than the original but apparently the story is completely different from the original…

No. 1715622

>>1715593
I think that's supposed to be Elyon?

No. 1715635

File: 1696433497944.png (664.19 KB, 541x678, 3ngs5g1bwn391.png)

>>1714638
Bleak but late to Stephen King, everything he's made has women being raped and/or victimized as a plot point. The rest are news to me though. The Spongebob one cuts real deep, Stephen Hillengburg must be rolling in his grave.

>>1714677
Its the same old tired song and dance.

>Men in animation draw the same kind of content all the time get to keep their jobs get to put it into mainstream media and be praised for it

Other pedofiles get to get away with it -why can't I!?

>It just feels unfair, why can't I publicly be a pedo!? uwu


>This is the equivalent of revenge porn(kek), people exposing my fictional/private kinks(of child abuse) publicly

I'm a pedo who put my pedophilic work out into the public for other predators and in doing so victimized children but I, the distributor of child pornography am the victim! uwu

>>1715406
>>1715462
>>1715426
Lesbian detected

No. 1715637

>>1715635
Bait detected.

No. 1715664

>>1715537
This appeals to the level 99 neet otaku who has been isolated from women for so long that they've forgotten what it looks like when they eat.

No. 1715680

>>1715537
I try not to hate on anime, but it's so hard not to hate so much of it.

No. 1715696

>>1715635
>lesbian detected
?

No. 1715700

>>1715696
It's just bait, ignore

No. 1715715

>>1715605
I think Hay Lin looks cute, and I know that hair like this is trendy at the moment, but I cannot help but immediately think about the "the token Asian girl with a random streak of colored hair" trope

No. 1715717

>>1715440
kek i like to copy from real people too(normally old cons) but why the fuck would you post it online? that's the shit that you keep to yourself or upload without the ref attached, how creepy

No. 1715719

>>1715488
>>1715537
it's good but it's literally this, there is so little to animate they overcompensate by making everything bouncy. Personally, i really like it, but i can understand its not everyone's cup of tea, however you cannot deny it's well done, that's just cope nonny

No. 1715728

>>1715719
That girl moves like those ai-interpolated 60fps videos kek

No. 1715731

>>1715578
>>1715605
No way they gave my girl Taranee the stupid zoomer broccoli haircut… Also her skin is borderline gray. I agree the og art is much better.

No. 1715732

>>1715728
ikr, couldn't they have used those movements for a scene that actually deserves the effort?

No. 1715738

>>1715728
>>1715732
some of you are some retarded, that's the joke

No. 1715743

>>1715440
I'd be so mad if someone gave me more of a waist definition than I have and gave me sexualized ideals to make my bigger body be more appealing.

No. 1715745

File: 1696442337664.jpg (119.95 KB, 585x800, skydoll.jpg)

>>1715578
Original artist is best known for picrel, I guess it could cause some problems in the current year kek.

No. 1715755

>>1715745
gross what the fuck, couldnt they hire any artist that wasnt a fucking coomer for their comics made for girls?

No. 1715770

>>1715745
They really calling anyone an artist these days

No. 1715785

>>1715635
>seething scrote posting schizobabble
How original

No. 1715789

File: 1696444394380.jpeg (38.91 KB, 1170x651, 625e13fb-696a-43ff-9545-a477e7…)

>>1715537
I dislike anime at times for these type of art tropes along with others, but the amount of western animation geared towards older audiences looks pretty slim (especially outside family guy clones), so I just read manga instead. Boom, no more weird animation

No. 1715796

>>1715578
Why does Taranee look like an ftm he/they now? In the original comic she was just as girly as her friends.

No. 1715804

>>1715755
Believe or not but Skydoll was shilled as a feminist comic back then, because it featured sex liberation themes (weird sex scenes) and matriarchy kek.

No. 1715805

>>1715796
Huh? She looks like a normal sporty looking girl. The way you described it I expected to see tranny art when it looks normal. Was it the sports bra you mistook for a binder

No. 1715812

File: 1696445483112.jpeg (1.46 MB, 1125x1898, A4E02A23-A111-47E8-BA8D-BDD8C4…)

>>1715440
She likes to exaggerate conventionally unattractive features, look at picrel of her drawing of herself in the Spiderverse style. Her nose isn’t that crooked irl. Even when they’re not there, for example the woman on the left doesn’t look like she has that belly or ass. (And also as other anons pointed out she’s made them look sexier at the same time fsr) It’s not wrong to exaggerate but she’s either naïve to how publicly posting these looks assholish or she’s doing a mean girl move. Like if she’s going to make a lesson out of this at least use stock photos or a movie for an example, at least those are actors and not just totally random normal people. If she chose celebrities she could have made the caricatures as mean as she wanted and no one would’ve cared.

No. 1715815

>>1715805
She's still cute, she just looks way different compared to the rest of the girls. In the original she had a nerdy thing going on and dressed in bright colors.

No. 1715816

>>1715804
feminist is just a scape goat to sexist porn and get away with it nowadays

No. 1715817

>>1715812
she's kind of a mediocre artist

No. 1715822

>>1715812
kek she made herself look so much uglier
>>1715755
i vividly remember that at some point the art of W.I.T.C.H. started getting more and more sexualized and it made me feel uncomfortable. it sucks because i always found the characters very relatable and for instance irma, will and cornelia reminded me of other girls from my life. they weren't trope-y and had very realistic problems

No. 1715888

>>1715560
>It’s my goal as an artist to send the world a message that men exist to be pleasure objects
Based, not enough males know this.

No. 1715891

>>1715785
I thought that post was meant to be sarcastic, am I missing something??

No. 1715907

File: 1696450707129.webm (1 MB, 576x1024, wtf.webm)

I dont use tiktok, can someone tell me whats up with monialynn? this is beyond creepy what the fuck, i though it was an edit

No. 1715911

>>1715907
is this bitch really glamorizing grooming right now or is she disturbed by the fact who she liked were pedos

No. 1715912

>>1715907
What part do you find creepy? And where are you following her if not tiktok kek don't tell me you like her art

No. 1715913

>>1715907
She seems horrified by that fact, not glamorizing it. This is the discussion we had upthread.

No. 1715917

>>1715912
i just saw it posted on a cringe tiktok compilation kek. i dont know why but it feels creepy to me

No. 1715918

>>1715917
i understand why i find it creepy its the ''i actually had a CHANCE'' part, it's very poorly worded

No. 1715924

>>1715578
There's a w.i.t.c.h. reboot??? Man, the art style looks tumblruan gendie woke-esque with all the horrible facial features, wrong weird skin tones, and terrible fashion sense. Why did they make Cornelia and Irma darker? And as another anon said, why did they make Teranee gray? And is the platinum blone supposed to be eleon?

No. 1715926

File: 1696452167974.png (Spoiler Image,7.26 MB, 3840x3202, FwrLnAyWIAAGobe.png)

>>1715917
I've seen that exact phrase used as a form of joke-coping about youtubers getting exposed for having talked with underage fans, don't know why she decided to make it this dramatic animation because it shifts the tone too much and makes the intent unclear. Her other art is about her DBH oc being with connor kek I'm always so baffled by women who draw these coomshit proportions and emotionless faces. It always feels like they are memeing themselves into this stuff because that's all they see online

No. 1715928

>>1715719
So they could animate all these unnatural movements but not mouth shapes that match the Japanese language pronunciation kek

No. 1715936

>>1715822
I read the entire comic but I don't remember it getting more sexual? But I remember in the early chapters Irma used her transformation to go on a date with an older boy which was weird. And I always thought their transformations making them appear older was strange, as well as their relationships being mostly with boys older than them who go to college by the end of the comics while thd girls are still in high school. I also remember the art style changing because of another artist taking over who had an ugly code lyoko knock off anime art style and it was painful to look at.

No. 1715939

>>1715812
I think she literally thinks she's being woke and inclusive by doing this. Like she's saying "I saw these fat women as inspiration and made them look sexy and curvy when we all know normal people wouldn't do that to these fatties, and look how not-perfect I am admitting to being with my crooked nose, aren't I nice and humble and inclusive".
I think she's just so woke she's gone all the way to rude performative asshole

No. 1715944

>>1715719
Now this example is a lot different than the other two above. There are more frames here, making the movement smoother for sure but again the movement is just so odd and wrong. Still not very well-done despite the number of frames and good rendering. Animation is about the movement, not about how many details there are in a frame.

>>1715789
Same. I used to watch a lot more anime but now I haven't seen one in years. Everything is catering to gross ugly coomers and the stories are boring. Plus the average style seems to be going to shit, I'm so tired of retarded-looking moe anime girls making random noises every two seconds.

No. 1715957

File: 1696454910856.jpeg (486.93 KB, 2048x2048, C318AB16-8371-4E18-AF83-74795B…)

>>1711189
But it is whimsical and nostalgically childish. Definitely not an exclusive style or attribute to japaneee artists, personally I think Yoshitomo Nara’s work looks like old school Scandinavian cartoons.

Either way, I only posted the Japanese gallery artists >>1710164 to show that the generalization of all Japanese art being sameface anime coomer art wasn’t true. Not to say it was superior to western art or to highlight those artists as flawless.

No. 1715999

>>1715719
The chicken nugget example is technically well animated but it's way too noticeably an example of what >>1715664 said but not specifically for women, for everything. It reminds of that story about Miyazaki telling the Spirited Away animators to make dragon Haku leaving the river look like a dog shaking of water after a bath and getting triggered because the animators didn't know what a dog leaving bath looked like.

I can see how someone could appreciate the animation of those things, but it makes me think that the animator are wasting their skill making scenes way too bouncy and jerky for no reason when it could have looked better with less effort.
And I hate when shows noticeably do your vidrel. It comes of as "pandering" in a way.

No. 1716040

File: 1696460021342.jpeg (1.85 MB, 1170x1797, IMG_6394.jpeg)

What is up with Cornelia’s eyebrows though

No. 1716068

>>1716040
This looks so generic. Like these tumblr cute art styles, easy to look at but so damn boring cus everyone looks the same. They butchered them and if that white haired girl is really elyon then it's worse than I thought.

No. 1716079

>>1716040
I actually think this is really cute. It's better to me than modern kids animation styles, and appeals to the rise in popularity of anime in the west. It will be good for kids

No. 1716083

>>1716040
You really can't beat the graphic novel style but it's too detailed for animation I guess

No. 1716086

>>1716040
Why isn't Irma and Will tomboys anymore? Why does it have to be Taranee who's a tomboy? because she's black? why isn't hay lin a weird girl with an alien aesthetic? I don't like this. They probably created it to compete with winx club season 9 reboot.

No. 1716089

>>1716086
Omg they gave Irma lipo and top surgery

No. 1716092

>>1716040
Goddayum they look so similiar to each other now. At least in the original you could see subtle differences between the girls' faces (Cornelia's face being longer, Hay Lin's eyes smaller). But now, they all have the "generic cute face".

No. 1716093

>>1716089
Legit, the fuck. Irma's literally supposed to be "thicker" than the rest of the girls.

No. 1716094

>>1716040
reminds me to how they ruined Monster High by making all of them into cutesy filtered tiktok/insta models, awful, just awful

No. 1716097

>>1716040
why do black characters often get such weird desaturated skintones? it looks so weird.

No. 1716109

File: 1696464173073.jpeg (191.99 KB, 800x341, IMG_5204.jpeg)

>>1715497
I like Olivier Ledroit‘s art. The story is pretty much moid edgelord bullshit so fair warning. He also worked on Wika.

No. 1716110

File: 1696464199688.png (227.35 KB, 350x341, witchh.png)

>>1716040
I hate how much they changed their character design. Hay Lin and Will have the skintone of printerpaper, Taranee looks ashy, Irma looks happy go lucky and Corneila has perment dipples now. Also hate that Hay Lin is now an Asian hair streak trope.

No. 1716149

>>1716093
I had a friend who specifically fell in love with this series because irma was "big boned" and so was she, that's how I was introduced. She was also funny and her weight meant alot in the series because it never detracted from her character. It's weird seeing them change basically the whole essence of her kek

No. 1716153

File: 1696467184340.jpg (418.32 KB, 1080x1740, 4eed300bbc20c0aa3b3c26162953fe…)

>>1716040
They MASSACRED my girl who tf is that platinum blonde Elsa bitch with the spiral perm

No. 1716195

File: 1696469762972.jpg (453.45 KB, 1080x1783, 1696350025908038.jpg)

anyone following this? i dont know if it's true or the artist is making it up for attention, but wild if true

No. 1716206

File: 1696470314897.png (420.07 KB, 590x1078, ginger faggot.png)

>>1716195
he's asking for money so this have to be fake right? but also why make up something as retarded as getting doxxed for using a ms paint tool bar when being a higurashi fan that's also a ginger enough? weird stuff

No. 1716255

File: 1696472352547.jpeg (892.76 KB, 1125x1015, 5929C335-3BF0-4F76-8B98-684240…)

>>1716195
I can believe it, they draw that ms paint animecore shit zoomers are big into but attracts the most insane fucking people. But at the same time they’re not taking the precautions like privating, not posting pictures of themselves, and not taking commissions which could open them up for scams like any normal person going through this situation would. Just shows what Twitter does to your brain.

No. 1716304

>>1716195
Hmm I don't know nonny but after taking a look at his profile I think this shit is fabricated.
And, I could be wrong but I don't think the drawings where made on ms paint, and there's the fact that all of the drawings are in poor quality so you can't see the pixels clearly.
Sahed for tinfoiling.

No. 1716629

What are anons' favorite ways to organize art inspirations? Stuff like references, favorite paintings, drawings in styles you want to achieve, that kind of thing. Pinterest is alright now that you can sub-section boards but it compresses the images and the braindead zoomer "OMG WHAT IS THIS" comments can get pretty annoying, not to mention that stuff you upload can get taken down at any time if it's deemed mature content. I also just download stuff to my hard drive + use a big pureref file but I worry for my storage space. Sorry if this is an autistic question I just like organizing things

No. 1716631

>>1716040
They butchered Hay Lin who the fuck is that… and that is not Elyon either they always iron out the cool designs into the most boring generic shit

No. 1716636

>>1716631
Elyon was my girl and they gave her a full lacefront I hate this

No. 1716637

>>1716040
I honestly hope they don't make Taranee a they/them. but I totally see it happening because she was the nerdy tomboy in the group.

No. 1716641

>>1716637
But she wasn't, she just had short hair. All of them were a degree of "tomboy" except hay Lin and Cornelia

No. 1716649

>>1716641
you don't get nonny, Taranee was the one who was good at math and that's a boy thing!!!

No. 1716672

>>1716195
its fake, animecore bitches are one of the most attention whorey people you can meet also i dont think theyre doxxing (if its true) just for the artist using a toolbar in their art i think its probably some other bullshit they are being harassed for, animecore artists are canabalize each other all the time or it could be they were trying to le 4chAN EDGEY

No. 1716675

>>1715488
Because the autistic weeb /beg/ scrotes in this thread think more movement = better animation and get personally offended every time someone doesn't think brainless malepandering anime waifu shit is the pinnacle of art. Seriously, this thread is so fucking chock full of men and they don't even bother to hide it. They're even more annoying and lacking of taste than the salty tiktok artists who come here to post petty drama of an artist they're jealous of. And on the off chance that it's actually scrotebrained women, then shame on them.

No. 1716678

>>1714970
>For OG nonna, just don't talk about gender at all
AYRT and see the thing is, I sorta want to make it vocally known that I don't support gender bullshit at all. I know this would be social suicide online but I want to put a line in the sand of being an artist who openly doesn't support gender ideology. The stereotype is that artists have to just accept trans bullshit and I want to be an example of just because you're an artist doesn't mean you have to support that.

Again, it's not like I intend to blather on and on about how stupid gender ideology is, I was just thinking of making a disclaimer pinned tweet or picture and letting it speak for itself.

No. 1716680

>>1715605
Is it just me or is Taranee drawn weirdly sexualized with the skintight clothes vacuumed to her body and pronouncing her curves? The way this artists draws her has bothered me since I saw the first promotional images because everyone else is portrayed as a normal teenage girl while Taranee is given this strangely sexy flare when in the original she was the nerdy brainiac in contrast to her more confident witch form.

Overall I find it so strange that they picked such a subpar artists for the job because the original comic was so known for the lively, intricate art style that going from that to the flat, deadfaced webtoon aesthetic seems so cheap. I doubt they gave a shit about making a good tribute since the purpose is to cash in on a nostalgic property.

No. 1716686

File: 1696492236852.jpg (332.57 KB, 2048x1152, F2PNqqpXkAAIOzf.jpg)

>>1715605
>I find Taranees style cuter in the reboot
I have to respectfully disagree

No. 1716688

>>1716678
Limit yourself to a short spiel, not pinned, just make it very clear and then leave it at that and not mention it again. Keeps it classy

No. 1716690

>>1716680
>Is it just me or is Taranee drawn weirdly sexualized with the skintight clothes vacuumed to her body and pronouncing her curves?
No, I have to agree. It gives off intentional troon vibes
>>1716686
The befores are a lot cuter to me, they could have toned down on the yellow skin but the style was so much more unique and iconic

No. 1716693

>>1716040
>What is up with Cornelia’s eyebrows though
oh my god she's doing the wiggle brow trend

>>1715957
now THIS is superior cartoons kek Little My, my beloved

No. 1716695

File: 1696493691954.png (314 KB, 396x401, susan.png)

>>1716040
Adding on, I really don't get what they were thinking with Will's mom

No. 1716698

>>1716680
Samefag to wonder why the fuck every "artist" in this post was written in plural as "artists", I have no idea how it happened but I guess autocorrect had its hand in it. I'm not a retard I swear

>>1716690
Good to know I'm not the only one kek, they're supposed to be like 13 so it feels so weird to have her look like such a pandering bombshell. It feels like the artist wanted to make her some fetishized "sexy strong black woman" stereotype and it feels inappropriate in contrast to how she was in the original. I don't think that's intentional, they just picked the wrong person for the job.

>>1716695
KEK what the fuck??? I'd love to know the reasoning behind this change, I know whitewashing is such a meme but if this isn't a clear example of it then I don't know what is. It's like they're trying to troll us.

No. 1716699

File: 1696494513531.jpg (167.52 KB, 700x961, 1696430551048.jpg)

>>1716680
Looking at some more pages, damn, you are onto something. What possessed them to turn a shy nerdy 13 year old girl into this?

Also the new artist @GiuliaAdragna on twitter said Taranee is her favorite redesign lol

No. 1716700

File: 1696495071197.jpeg (59.59 KB, 350x355, IMG_2380.jpeg)

>>1716040
Why did they uglify Cornelia so much? What are those brows and weird mouth, she looks like an alien. She was so pretty in the original too. She also doesn't have blue eyes and the brown eyes don't look the best in that design, all the other girls kept their eye color. Why does it seem like they were kinda virtue signaling with this… F for Elyon and Cornelia fans.

No. 1716701

>>1716700
Samefag, noticed they changed Will's eyes too. All the changes are ugly imo. One of the worst redesigns I've seen, very 2020 discontinued webtoon style.

No. 1716702

>>1716699
I'm guessing the artist really wanted to insert her own OC into the story and made Taranee that. It happens with a lot of reboots, the new artist is desperate to add their personal Mary Sue into the series' canon and it ends up being tacky and obvious as fuck, be it an entirely new character or just changing the original character around entirely. I normally like the confident tomboy type but it's pretty tone deaf to make the only black character that stereotype especially when the original character was the opposite.

No. 1716704

File: 1696496626039.jpg (250.43 KB, 1024x1024, FxTQM_4WIAEasRQ.jpg)

>>1716699
Wtf they made the one black girl a TIF just cause she has short hair ? They really can't help themselves, Taranee had such cute comfy fashion originally, it looks like she's showing off her double masectomy in your pic…

No. 1716705

File: 1696496683285.jpeg (2.28 MB, 1688x1228, IMG_2383.jpeg)

The new transformation outfit looks like pajamas. Faces aren't expressive. Honestly it looks like a fan made reboot someone would post on derviantart. Won't spam this thread with with any further kek

No. 1716706

>>1716704
>double mastectomy
Come on anon, she looks weirdly muscular but she obviously has breasts in that picture.

No. 1716707

>>1716629
I recently made a discord server for myself to save things, super useful with the way you can sort stuff into channels, add notes and pin things. The pictures are also saved without taking up space on your device

No. 1716710

>>1716706
Come on anon, she's very obviously TIF coded.

No. 1716714

>>1716704
So much of the original charm is lost by drawing outfits that match the boring current trends. I'm sure it's also done to cut the production time. You're insane for insisting on this "tif coded" shit though kek you're projecting a bit too much

>>1716705
The white skin and purple shading makes her look dead, why would they do this

No. 1716715

>>1716710
>tomboys are TIF coded!!!!!
Not this shit again good god you need to step back from the internet discourse

No. 1716716

>>1716715
Broccoli hairstyles are TIF-coded kek

No. 1716717

>>1716040
They’re supposed to be older when they transform but seem to be the same age still. It would make sense if Taranee got some defined muscle when she transformed but god they just had to make a 13 year old look like she’s ready for college sports.

No. 1716718

>>1716195
>>1716255
i've seen some of these "animecore" 'tards on pinterest and they're utter retards kek

No. 1716719

>>1716704
aw her outfits were so cute… she's one of my inspirations for fashion

No. 1716725

File: 1696500952453.jpg (2.5 MB, 2492x1714, flashback.jpg)

>Reboot Taranee already mogged by her flashback self who appears for 2 pages
She seems more shy like the original Taranee too, god it's like they're teasing people

No. 1716726

>>1716715
She's wearing a binder what more do you want kek

No. 1716728

>>1716726
That's a sports bra, anon. Jesus the anons on this site see a sporty tomboy and their mind immediately goes to tranny shit, some of you need to go outside more to work on that discourse brainrot.

No. 1716733

>>1716728
nta, but sports bras like that are very much tif coded now, it's not a reach at all to assume someone who works in liberal media intended to draw a tif/tif-bait when her original fashion style was incredibly different and girly, and the actual tomboy characters are not drawn like tomboys. It's not an accident, they know what they're doing

No. 1716737

>>1716733
>sports bras are tif coded
Have you been to a gym lately? Seems like you should retard.not everything is tif or tim coded

No. 1716741

>>1716733
Seek help

No. 1716744

>>1716733
You sound like one of those female commentary youtubers who never shut the fuck up about how femininity is demonized kekkk

No. 1716774

File: 1696510183412.jpg (227.78 KB, 1280x1280, a-whole-year-since-my-last-enb…)

>>1716737
>>1716741
>>1716744
Y'all just don't keep up with troon fashion trends (which is valid kek). "Tomboy" has literally been replaced with transmasc. Young girls don't claim to be tomboys anymore, they instead claim to be trans. She's not wearing a trendy colorful sports bra or athleisure fashion, she's wearing clothes that match how every fucking tif portray themselves in dark neutrals.

No. 1716787

>>1716698
Everyone looks so stereotypical and flat imo. Taranee for the reason you stated ofc, Hay Lin adding to the "asian girl with a dyed streak" list and dressing like an aliexpress uwu soft girl and even the white characters look more stereotypically white and "basic" somehow. Will looks like some moid author's ideal ginger waifu-next-door he based off some photo model and what was the point of making her mom look like THAT ? Cornelia looks like she gets pumpkin spice latte jokes made about her and what the hell's even going on with Elyon ? (insert joke about smoking weed here)

>>1716704
2000s fashion is more popular now than ever. All there was to do was remove a few dated elements like the ballet flats and leggings, better the transformation designs, upgrade the art style and there you had a reboot. They look like something out of late 2010s tumblr and that makes the whole thing look so dated already.

tl;dr I wish authors still went outside sometimes

No. 1716791

>>1714108
Yeah so far I've just been copying the assignment images of rib cages and whatever, using the simplified methods he teaches in the video and applying the tips he gives e.g. measuring using cranial units, so it's not mindless copying (I think, kek). Then when I wanna draw something for fun I try to apply what I just did, like take one of the rib cages and construct a pose for my husbando out of it.

No. 1716794

>>1716774
Actual brainrot kek I hope you can find the time to take a nice walk today nona

No. 1716795

>>1716704
we truly do live in the most soulless era for fashion, don't we? i seriously cant stand the fashion for this and the MH reboot, 2010s/20s fashion is so awful, plain and boring.

No. 1716815

I am glad that more and more japanese artists are opening youtube channels. western channels like proko that explain anatomy and other fundamentals are great, but i cannot stand the ones that dwelve more into the finishing touches/style/appeal like ethan becker and that other one equally obnoxious one with a hideous artstyle.

No. 1716874

>>1716255
surprised they aren't a tranny since this cyber/animecore aesthetic is popular among TIMs on Twitter.

No. 1716879

>>1716686
I'm going to throw up. Will doesn't look like herself anymore either.

No. 1716907

>>1716815
>ethan becker
My god I hate that moid so much he keeps sperging on about working on voltron and shit but his art is such ass festishizes black women so much while being a pasty ass white man his art disgusts me

No. 1716909

>>1715578
nooo why would they do a reboot, the original was perfect as it was. the new style is incredibly bland and lacks detail

No. 1716985

Drew a man with his ass and balls out again today.

No. 1716999

>>1716985
Pics or it didn't happen.

No. 1717030

>>1716707
You can make a discord for yourself? And you being the only member? Ily nona

No. 1717031

>>1716688
Okay, short and sweet but to the point lol.

No. 1717032

>>1716985
post it in the husbando thread nonnie or you're a moid

No. 1717053

>>1716815
Agree, I appreciate the focus on fundamentals from the western side and think they're just as important, but Japanese artists are way more focused on composition and how to make the image look interesting. Watching their tutorials about eyecatching and the usage of palettes has improved my art in leaps more than any fart-huffing ex animator making their content so hard to approach you need five years of art school to understand half of the theory when you just want to draw something fun.

No. 1717181

>>1716774
I understand what you're trying to say nonnie, not sure why you're getting so much vitriol. She looks like every piece of tif "genderfluid" art I've ever seen, in a way that looks intentional to me too. If I were you I'd stop explaining yourself before infight bans get handed out cause the more you're trying to explain yourself the angrier everyone is getting, even though imo you're not really saying anything unreasonable.
>>1716704
Aww I never read w.i.t.c.h. but I miss derpy fish eyed early 2000s art kek, it was so cute. Late 80s/early 90s anime too had the same derp eyes and it's very endearing to me

No. 1717207

>>1717053
>Japanese artists are way more focused on composition and how to make the image look interesting

Because they're teaching illustration, not drawing fundamentals, there's a huge difference. If you're looking for western artists who focus on teaching illustration, I rec the School of Visual Storytelling run by 3 children's book illustrators. Look out for their "how to fix your art" livestreams, which they put up for a few days for free before it goes behind a paywall. Illustration is a separate subject from drawing, and not many people know how to successfully teach it.

No. 1717219

>>1717181
>Aww I never read w.i.t.c.h. but I miss derpy fish eyed early 2000s art kek, it was so cute. Late 80s/early 90s anime too had the same derp eyes and it's very endearing to me
I second you on this nonna. Growing up in the 2000s, I cringed at a lot of the wannabe anime art styles like Witch but in hindsight, they have a nice charm to them that feels cozy to it. I also agree on 80s and 90s anime, I miss it but I think it's because I'm over the oversaturated colors, moe-face, and super cleaned with generic factor that a lot of newer anime goes for these days.

No. 1717228

>>1717207
The issue was that the Japanese are MORE focused on making the illustration presentable when westerners are hyperfocused on the old masters' stuff, it's derivative of all art schools still being based on the teachings of European classic art more about artist circlejerking than making something people find aesthetic. Sure there are western artists who know how to make an illustration look good but it's about the larger trends.

No. 1717237

>>1717207
something that i learnt through japanese artists is contra posto, i have no idea why but i dont remember any big western art channel talking about it and it helped my art a lot. i am glad i have english as a second language because there is so much good drawing content nowadays, when i was a kid you had to choose between how to draw manga-tier tutorials and university lectures

No. 1717297

File: 1696543360528.jpg (322.82 KB, 1074x600, Screenshot_20231005_230246_Gal…)

>>1716795
Mild sperg incoming I think it's cos with tiktokers churning out retarded "aesthetics" every 2 weeks instead of having a personality, including badly regurgitating interesting aesthetics from eras past, there is no defining 2020s look so clothes have to be bland but with bright colours for wide appeal. I was thinking about this while looking at the 3 new characters in the shitty clone high season 2. They tried to make them modern I guess but they look out of place and their designs don't even say anything about them, except for the Frida Kahlo one cos you can vaguely tell that's who she's meant to be.

No. 1717370

>>1716686
The appeal of witch was how visually interesting it was. Each had their own array of outfits, bedrooms, personalities, expression. It was visually fun to read. I never would have read it as a kid were it not for it being visually interesting, the original cartoon they tried was horrible too and the art style was vile and made them look like men for some reason

No. 1717371

>>1716695
THEY WHITEWASHED WILLS MOM? How do you whitewash a white lady

No. 1717374

File: 1696550087431.jpg (255.52 KB, 808x1200, EqUj6woWMAUGzly.jpg)

>>1716705
I bet their argument is that their bodies were "sexualized" "idealized" and "harmful" but I remember being like 11 years old reading this and thinking they were the coolest looking bitches ever. Their looks were amazing. Little girls aren't getting eating disorders over this kind of shit and im tired of them turning every new character design into a block of cheese now because of muh body issues. They were the western millenial child's sailor moon.

No. 1717375

>>1716715
You dont have to wear an obvious compression binder to be a tomboy. They massacred her AND gave her broccoli hair.

No. 1717389

>>1716704
>>1717375
Taranee was so adorable. They were all so adorable in the 2000s comic. The first artist was a moid but never went too far with oversexualization. You could beleive that the girls were fashion conscious teenagers who wanted to express their personalities while looking cute. The new girls dress like they shop exclusively at Temu and The Gap.
>>1716794
I get what she's trying to say. If reboot Taranee only had the tiktok broccoli hairstyle or the sports bra it would be one thing, but all of that combined with her suddenly becoming a stoic tomboy while all the other girls remain feminine says a lot. It would be different if Will or Irma were the boyish ones since they were both a little tomboyish in the 2000s comic. Troon and troon sympathizer twitter artists have been headcanoning darker-skinned female characters as trans for years now. I'm surprised neither she nor Irma were made obese as well.
>>1717374
The whole sperg over cartoons and toys giving little girls body image issues is getting so annoying. Barbie's boobs, the Winx girl's tiny waists, and Sailor Moon's long legs don't give little girls eating disorders, projection from their parents do. Little girls look at them and think "Wow, she's pretty. I like her" while dad gets a boner and mom gets mad at the cartoons for giving dad a boner. No one ever argues that GI Joes give little boys body image issues and they're all inhumanly jacked. It's just only ever girl-oriented media. People pretend to be concerned for the mental health of little girls then turn around and make fun of the ones who actually suffer from the same illnesses. It's never about their safety, just having something to shit on girls for liking.

No. 1717407

File: 1696552255094.jpeg (268.34 KB, 1242x1244, IMG_0418.jpeg)

>>1716705
>>1717374
This shit is so soulless lol. I don’t get why they even attempted a comic reboot. Imagine someone making manga reboots of the original naruto or sailor moon mangas. Why not just promote re-releases of the original comic?

No. 1717418

>>1717407
These faces are straight out of a shitty how-to-draw manga book. Magical girls are supposed to have eye-catching iconic costumes. These girls are just wearing MLM yoga outfits. And what's going on with Irma's feet?

No. 1717520

File: 1696559293974.jpg (490.86 KB, 1311x816, mossart.jpg)

What do you guys think about Dinolich/Moss Lawson. They illustrated a Graphic novel under the name "Hellaween". Theyre pretty successful and Im thinking maybe as a beginner it might be a good idea to try and learn from them but idk if its a bad idea

No. 1717524

>>1717520
whats there to learn? its a pretty generic basic cartoony artstyle

No. 1717526

>>1717520
It seems like a style inspired by Jhonen Vasquez, maybe check out his work instead, or similar stuff.

No. 1717535

>>1717526
Oh okay I will absolutely give his work a look
>>1717524
I just think the art looks very cute

No. 1717540

>>1716717
Not to defend the reboot but they're 16 in it

No. 1717545

File: 1696560960243.jpg (234.33 KB, 700x1013, [18-08-21] 1031960278429261825…)

Sorry for venting, depression has been hitting hard. I am the anon venting because Japanese artists can shit out the most boring uninspired garbage and get an anime adaptations and a bunch of readers/fans. I cant stop thinking about tsulala/rem's webcomic devil's candy, and how it would have gotten an anime adaptation already if it was made by a japanese artist for a japanese audience, and published in a japanese magazine. The art is beautiful, and on-par with some really popular manga that gets carried by style alone, the story is cutesy school bait, and it's overall pretty well done and enjoyable. I am 100% sure it would be way more popular if it was by a Japanese artist, and that though left me pretty blackpilled about being a western artist. I don't know, maybe i am just letting the depression cloud my mind, but seeing so many western artists make comics and most of them being forgotten because western readers only want to read manga by japanese artists, and western artists not having a real support system makes me so sad.

No. 1717554

>>1717545
Art as a form to make yourself known and praised by people is just a time sink mess that will make you feel more and more depressed as time goes by.
It doesn’t matter what you do, if you have a beautiful voice, if you can play a cool instrument, if you can paint realistic shit so real you can taste the peanut butter and the cheese of a sandwich, so great at writing that you can make people eat up 500 pages of nonsense in an hour… the moment you see someone being recognized before you, doesn’t matter the age, the sex or the place that person comes from, you will feel miserable.
I just believe in art as something that you have to do because your brain has ideas that you want to materialize, that’s it, if 50 people want to buy it, wonderful, but the more you try to turn your art into a product, the less you will love it and the more miserable you will feel.
It’s such an old story that I particularly can’t believe that sometimes I feel sad about not being better at art or not being recognized even though others are recognized for things that I personally consider less interesting and less appealing, than what I do or what someone else that I know can do.
In the end it’s all about remembering that while it hurts knowing that things are different everywhere, that studios will never welcome your ideas because they want products, that having a good idea doesn’t mean people won’t try to cancel you for saying an edgy joke in public when you were 13 years old, that maybe you will never get more than 100 followers (in which 20 of them are family and friends that never like or comment on your stuff unless it’s for the sake of politeness), that maybe you should just at least finish materializing your ideas and putting them out there so at least one person can like it and comment on it “I liked it!” Or so that you can at least say “well, at least I can’t say it isn’t out there”.

No. 1717555

>>1717407
>>1717418
I'm kekking harder at how stiff Hai Lin's pose is lmao. She does not look like she's floating at all, she 100% looks like the artist just drew her standing and then the editor had to rotate the drawing.

The art isn't that awful. One nonna said it looks like someone's fancomic, and I really agree. I think an official comic could had gotten away with having this style if it was a short side story/spinoff with some sort of gimmick going on, but for a reboot is just lmao.
What's even the point of rebooting it (especially with worse art)? I feel it's too easy to compare it to the old one and for people to drop it because of that.

No. 1717565

>>1717554
yeah, yeah i get the whole ''do art for yourself uwu'' that's not my point, tsulala/rem are obviously doing it for themselves considering that i have legit never heard anyone talk about devil's candy before, but it still depresses me how little people outside of japan give a shit about comics. i just wish we had our own support system, even china and korea have webtoon shit. it seems like the only way for people to give a shit about what you do in the west is to pander to the gender cult, like vivzie, or to furries like that boring comic abouts the cats that got a pilot recently.

No. 1717567

>>1717545
Devil’s candy was almost published by Tokyo pop back in the day. Had it got fully published by them I think it would have been fondly remembered like Dramacon but not a lot of buzz.

No. 1717569

>>1717565
Tbh most people don’t really give a shit about vivzie but yeah. Support systems won’t happen any sooner because everyone is too busy trying to cancel everyone else or too busy grooming children.
Is there even a way to start such a thing? Would it only work for the USA? Or would it accept people from other countries that aren’t asian? Idk, it sounds difficult knowing how retarded everyone is and how everyone is so petty nowadays that if your platform doesn’t include the option to say that you want to chop your breasts, or that a moid had a boner reading a comic about some little girls playing with toys at school, that you could get hashtag cancelled and your life completely ruined.

No. 1717618

File: 1696568241316.png (44.94 KB, 1860x112, 1696391558119.png)

>>1714413
Her friends and fans are now claiming shes in "EOL" but she lives alone and that this could take weeks/months. Important to note she's a notorious munchie. In her suicide note from 2019 before her exposure (https://web.archive.org/web/20190907172550/https://docs.google.com/document/d/18Jy4lLahTs7XWb4c31kw8O5nWyrQJC_6gbx27Nb4EWE/mobilebasic)
she talks about how no hospital would take her because they knew bullshit when they could see it kek.

No. 1717626

File: 1696568792652.jpg (449.06 KB, 900x1397, RCO024_1468852166.jpg)

>>1717407
The appeal of witch was the style specifically, there were not many visually detailed or interesting western-geared graphic novels. They completely tumblrized something that didn't need correction in the first place. It can also be noted that the young versions of themselves were still built like young girls, just non-obese ones. The transformation made them snatched but that was the appeal, its normal and not at all dysmorphia-inducing for young kids to see cool 'superhero' transformations like that and think wow, I want to look like that but no middle school girl is developing an ED from that anymore than they did from barbie or Lana del Rey. Adults always want an external factor to blame.

No. 1717632

>>1717389
Damn, I'm so sad they changed Taranee's personality. She was cute as the shy and nerdy one and I thought it was unique too since that archetype isn't often represented in black female characters. I'm also disappointed with Hay Lin's design. She was so spunky and weird and her design represented her personality so well. Now she looks like some generic anime girl. I guess the dyed streaks in her hair is supposed to represent how she's artistic, but now she's just one of the hundred other asian female characters with dyed streaks in their hair.

No. 1717636

File: 1696571246333.jpg (144.58 KB, 1104x621, asian-hairstreak-social.jpg)

>>1717632
I wonder if Asian women get tired of western cartoons representing them as the smol quirked up shorty with a single neon streak in their hair?
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/colored-streaks-on-asian-women-the-damaging-trope_b_580a54f5e4b0b1bd89fdb1b8

No. 1717644

I'm sorry but witch's early style reminds me of neopets faeries. I know that was the style at the time but it wasn't my favorite. The remake just looks generic, but it's generic for its time like the old one is.

No. 1717645

>>1717636
Do these types of Asian characters even resonate with Asian audiences? They seem like the western moid fantasies of a spunky manic pixie waifus more than a departure from the demure, submissive china doll stereotype.

No. 1717647

>>1717407
>black girl is masculine
>asian girl is a nerd
are we going backwards?

No. 1717648

File: 1696572446907.jpg (39.23 KB, 417x781, 3da003bd1f71232c5f24024105ec44…)

>>1717636
dont forget the glitch tech girl coomers were obssesed over

No. 1717649

>>1717645
All i know is that ABGs are way more common than whatever that trope is

No. 1717651

File: 1696573228469.jpg (287.81 KB, 600x900, 122_witch_by_galistar07water-d…)

>>1717644
Neopets fairies were cute too. Regardless the animation style is a thousand times worse, dated or not rather than tweaking it to be slightly more palletable for animation they instead tumblrized them. It at least had personality, they had every chance to give this a great color pallette and just fucked it up. The characters were diluted into something entirely different, they somehow racially stereotyped hay Lin even further and just decided they'd transmasc Taranee for being a, what, timid black girl? Just botched

No. 1717654

File: 1696574077920.jpg (515.35 KB, 900x1356, RCO024_1468806463.jpg)

I'm not like Disney adult-tier gayekeeping because I haven't thought about this series since i was a kid really but from a purely entertainment perspective I've noticed they completely remove every aspect of a series that made it appealing in reboots. Witch was popular among tweens because it offered a really colorful, detailed, fun art style that wasnt really geared to young girls at the time and the storyline also had emphasis on the lives of all the characters. You saw their rooms, their homes, their families, etc. It was pretty immersive. I was really young when I started reading it, so I did absorb it subconsciously and the topic is just reminding me of being really young and staring at the pictures, I could reread them over and over and they were shared between me and a few friends (2 boys actually, and 3 girls.) There was that like yassified LOTR emphasis on friendship but also a lot of conflict resolution, for instance Elyon being isolated by the antagonist and how it was the perfect representation of an abusive relationship and how a "cool" older man can seem perfect but is actually a monster grooming you and trying to keep you from those who love you. Obviously I'm an adult now and i don't actually spend my time waxing poetic about media meant for children, but we need to hold reboots at a much higher standard. This neverending cesspool of garbage is getting desperate.

No. 1717658

>>1717654
they wont stop until everything is rebooted, won't they? cant wait for the amazing chan and the chan clan reboot kek

No. 1717661

File: 1696575896465.jpg (9.85 KB, 259x194, EfWmcw3.jpg)

>>1715578
>>1715605
>>1716040
>one of the few girls' cartoons where the characters actually had distinctive faces and body types
>reboot turns them into the literal definition of same face syndrome
This looks so flat, boring and uninspired, completely devoid of the original's quirky y2k charm. Witch had such a fun comic-anime hybrid art style, how do you manage to fuck that up when anime is more mainstream than ever?
This is why I hate reboots, 9 times out of 10 they're the embodiment of picrel. Completely soulless

No. 1717667

File: 1696576493955.png (1.17 MB, 739x1024, topolino.png)

The reason this reboot looks as is it's italian comic industry produces way too much for a market that's way too small and pays the artists pennies. There's a gazillion publishing companies. It looks cheap because it's produced cheaply. If you are talented, fast and lucky enough you get snatched by Topolino, which is the main seller nation wise and a big one in Europe and the only title Disney cares for, more than Marvel even.
I got reached out by multiple comic companies and they expect you to make a 150 pages comic for the euro equivalent of 700-800$ and the promise of "royalties" that often have bullshit in the contract to take away those too.
t. Italian nonnie

No. 1717670

>>1717636
I'm so confused as to why this trend exists, it's so random and overdone and media just keeps doing it as if they're all being unique but it's always JUST the token Asian girl so it stands out like a sore thumb every time.

>>1717626
>>1717407
Idk how to say this other than it's such a delight to see anons discuss the witch comic, like even the bickering and disagreements are so wholesome to me thanks you're giving me the childhood experiences I missed out on because none of my friends liked it

No. 1717671

File: 1696577814530.jpg (142.85 KB, 936x720, 1615621357806.jpg)

nonnies with secret NSFW accounts, how do you keep your identity a secret? outside of having a different nick

No. 1717674

>>1717671
act like a different ethnicity and use different internet slang like using jaja instead of lol, do not reveal your workspace, if you make merch DO NOT USE THE SAME BGS(i almost got caught this way) change your style a bit and post the more raunchy stuff on private tweeter sites good luck nonnie

No. 1717675

>>1717626
I agree, also the appeal wasn't just the comic, it was the awesome magazine that came with it. It was fully illustrated as well, with various quizzes about friendship and witchcraft, there were dyi tutorials and cool presents every issue. I still have a lot of them because they were useful, pencil-cases, pens and WITCH themes bracelets and so on. I definitely think that if they started coming out again they'd sell really well.
I wonder if the new one is straight up just a comic? Or is it also a themed magazine?

No. 1717731

File: 1696587563326.jpg (70.2 KB, 564x594, 3ce40ac3aff06ee9aa7e86df6bbe34…)

>>1717407
The colors look incredibly dull compared to the original. The whole thing looks like uninspired AI generated bullshit

No. 1717829

>>1716695
>>1716705
>>1717407
Holy shit nonnas you just crushed me. As an Eurofag, WITCH was my life when I was 12, I wore all the merchandise like the necklace and the watch that came with the magazines and roleplayed them with my friends kek. The art looks terrible, why does western wannabe anime art from the 2000s look better than western wannabe anime art from the 2020s? It always has this Tumblr blobby look.

I also find it a bit racist that they not only erased all the features from Wil's mom to make her a genetic blonde soccer mom (she was so beautiful before), made Taranee who was shy and girly a Token Masculine Black Woman and gave Hay Lin the harejookyoo purple streak and korean poses? They were unique characters before and they have been reduced to racial stereotypes.

I also hate their transformations, I thought it was really cool and a huge plot point that they got adult bodies in their WITCH form. It was an interesting gimmick and opened topics about body image and such within the comic (with Irma for example).

This was the first western media for girls that I felt explored mature serious topics and didn't talk down to me like a dumb shopping and boy crazy toddler. A worse fate than the cartoon.

>>1716153
Elsie, I mean Elyon was my favorite too. I even got her comic special. If that ugly bleached blonde is her now I'm gonna kms

No. 1717840

File: 1696600689282.gif (4.13 MB, 500x392, tumblr_e7b8983a59bf8b8cc0505f8…)

>>1715578
Eurofags (including me) will just deny its existence, hopefully. They had the simplest option to just re-do the cartoon adaptation with the completed source material since the adaptation wasn't stellar. The creators had everything on a silver platter from plot to character design and I think a newer and accurate cartoon adaptation would've made some cash rather than this abomination.
It's all just a bad dreams nonnies

No. 1717870

>>1717671
Don't mention I do nsfw. I also draw a totally separate set of characters. Also I always use a separate email for my nsfw art as well. And obviously never share or even imply I've got an adult only account. People love to go "tee hee lewd" and that's the moment they fucked up because people can be nosey and WILL find it.

No. 1717911

>>1717870
Do you keep the nsfw account private then? Or are they both public?

No. 1717917

>>1717671
Where is the Archer picrel from. I want to know for very important reasons kek

No. 1717924

>>1716629
I used to use eagle cool to make various boards for art references based on media type, for example. You can also tag each file, browse by tags or by majority color. I'm pretty sure it also allows for viewing and rotating 3d models in gallery. It has a free 30 day trial and after that no subscriptions, just one time purchase. Right now I'm waiting for my student's license to get updated so I can get a discount when I'm going to buy.
Unfortunately so far at least all files are stored on your drive.
I also love organizing stuff and this app kinda scratches that itch. That, and I don't have to worry that all the dumb shit I saved on Pinterest or Twitter will get deleted and I'll lose it.

No. 1717938

>>1717675
I think it's more akin to a webtoon?

No. 1717957

>>1717911
Mine is public. People haven't made the connection even after all these years, unless I explicitly invite them, but even then it's gotta be someone I trust.

I keep it public because there are certain other artists I want to talk to that I wouldn't otherwise on my main account without some chucklefuck snooping into who I interact with. That, and it's funny to be hiding in plain sight.

No. 1717960

>>1717938

A little off topic but why does everything have to be a webtoon, what a shitty format to insist on because muh mobile device.
I really miss when media like witch had different ways to interact with it, via comic, magazine and cartoon, a lot more effort used to be put into people really liking and collecting things. Now it's all just fucking vaporware that's going to become lost media once link rot inevitably sets in.

No one is given the chance to deep dive into an interesting thing because it won't be trendy in 5 months. This witch reboot will be forgotten. It won't make a lasting impression on girls NOW, that's not the point. The point is always nostalgia money from the women who remember it. And brownie points if you add current politics and gendie talking points.

No. 1717970

>>1717545
fuck yes more devil's candy fans. it's so good (but i stopped keeping up with webcomics), i feel like an idiot for not buying the books when they were being sold in the past.

No. 1717974

>>1717674
don't fear get negative reputation if people find out?

No. 1718029

>>1717674
Race larping is a whole mental illness, anon. That's weird of you.

No. 1718105

>>1717924
Oh wow this is super cool! Thanks for the rec anon this is pretty much exactly what I was looking for

No. 1718180

>>1714935
This… is actually really good, wow

No. 1718197

>>1717671
I'm going to print off this image and gorilla glue it to my wall because I laughed way too hard

No. 1718202

File: 1696630033698.jpg (185.91 KB, 750x953, art.jpg)

Is the "don't repost/share" something new that artists are doing? I saw an anon post something earlier that had a similar disclaimer.

No. 1718220

>>1717407
I've been silently following this discourse but I have to say it. I think the new art is better. It's just cuter. And the witch outfits are cuter, too. I don't understand why everyone is bashing this.

No. 1718237

>>1718202
Probably because of art being reposted online without any credit to artists socials. And asking for credit didn't work, so they resorted to putting these watermark-like statements. This way no one will repost the art without credit because it's technically "ruined" now. But I'm not an artist, this is just my guess.

>>1718220
You must be 18+ to post here. Banter aside, you have low standards if the new art style looks good to you kek.

No. 1718238

>>1718202
>>1718237
Samefagging to add this is sort of a cute art, I like the hair, reminds me of my husbando's lol

No. 1718243

>>1718220
Cocomelon

No. 1718270

>>1718220
Don't know why everyone is jumping you for this kek but I agree. I think the art is really cute

No. 1718309

>>1718220
it looks so generic, there are probably thousands of webtoons with the same bland style, the original was at least unique. 2010s fashion also sucks ass

No. 1718371

>>1718029
I don't want my ass revealed as a NSFW bl artist while being a commercial artist (also whatever I draw technically falls into their copyright) so I do whatever I can with also using a vpn no way Leon getting railed is going to be their copyright, my example is extreme but you do what you must jajaja (also the nona asked how not to be revealed )

No. 1718376

>>1717636
I'm asian and I never really cared about these characters other than Nikki and Knives.. But Nikki is a punk girl from a 2004 cartoon and Knives only dyed her hair to copy Ramona. I dont think this stereotype is racist or anything, it's just boring. There are other asian characters anyway, it's not that much common of a stereotype.

No. 1718380

>>1717671
Just post and don't tell anyone it's you, not even friends. People fuck up when they reveal that they have a nsfw on main, it's very difficult to mask your style completely. Also, don't sign anything, even with your nsfw url. You don't need to worry about people making money off your nsfw, and if it gets reposted around, it's harder to trace back to you.

No. 1718416

>>1717671
The only way I know to be the most anonymous is through posting under anonymous on AO3. There’s no username attached, you won’t be getting too much interaction like comments in my experience and it’s not at all like other social media but great if you really just want to post your nsfw anonymously. You can even change settings so only logged in users can see it to really cut down on the audience that could see it. I pretty much post everything anonymously on AO3 since I don’t care about having a browsable gallery or gaining followers.
I don’t really suggest pretending to be ESL kek if you really want to mask how you write you could ask Chat GPT to write for you maybe? If you’re truly paranoid I’d upload anonymous on AO3, use a VPN, no putting writing or anything that could be significant to your area or culture into anything, and using a different (preferably something generic even if it hurts) art style on every post and if you’re posting in a small fandom avoid talking to anyone.

No. 1718431

>>1718220
I honestly don't mind it either. Tbh, the tv show got that ugly 4Kids treatment, the art in the original art is better than the tv was, but I don't understand the discourse with the new designs. I think it's just people gatekeeping their precious nostalgia for the most part.

No. 1718476

>>1716725
I don't know anything about WITCH but this girl's design here with the curls is so cute though?

No. 1718484

>>1718220
I don't agree with you but other nonnas immedeatly jumping you for having a different opinion is silly kek

>I think the new art is better. It's just cuter.

It is cute but it feels way flatter. The older style feels like it has more volume and detail. I think it would be serviceable in its own original comic, but it could be more "masterful" not a good choice of word but I don't really know how to say it and attaching it to a franchise is really setting it up to be compared with the old style.
Also
>the new art is better because it's cuter
This is actually something I really hate in a lot of modern reboots/franchises. I hate how every company apparently feels the need to make everything cute(r) so you get way more generic/safer looking stuff, like all the monster high characters being pastelified and rounded up, or puss in the last wish having oval irises by default instead of slanted also the humans imo looked like high budget lego friends compared to shrek's previous more realistic style

No. 1718599

>>1718416
I'm more suprised to know you can post comics on ao3! This helps alot nonnie! I try to change up the style as much as I can like changing how the face and brushwork looks but I still fear being found out I wish the nda didn't restricted me this much I just want to draw buff men getting blasted

No. 1718696

how do you nonnas feel about that new AI thing? I've been away from the online environment for a while, how are artists handling this?

No. 1718700

>>1718696
i feel like most of the fearmongering has vanished. yeah there are some fuckwits trying to pass ai art as real art (for example the scooby doo daphne's voice actor scam case) but i feel like most of it died down. i've seen more artists trying to use it as a tool to aid their creation process and being a little more accepting of ai as a tool in general. maybe it's my timeline in particular that's like that, but at least in my view things have calmed down. i haven't seen people whining about ai in a while now.

No. 1718702

>>1718696
The only thing that bothers me is the retards calling themselves "ai prompt artist" in their social media description kek
But that's all, what can I say, the non artists will get tired of using it eventually and the actual artists could use AI for reference.

No. 1718712

File: 1696687115236.png (231.32 KB, 1024x570, why-art-style-is-more-importan…)

About advice of changing art styles for differentiating sfw from nsfw accounts. Which styles you chose to? Did you adapted quickly? The thought itself exhaust me. Also do you use different email?

No. 1718727

>>1718712
It was easy for me, I just draw pets and animal crossing-esque characters on my main/commercial account, so since they don't really know how I actually draw humans (when I draw them for my main, it's usually on a chibi cutesy way) it's pretty hard to connect the NSFW and SFW accounts.
You sound too stressed to make a side account now though. If I were you, I would just draw NSFW on the side and keep it to myself as I slowly develop 2 different styles. If you still want to post it online, do it on a locked account and only allow follows from people totally unrelated to your main/followers. I think just something like coloring differently (cell-shading and paintery for example) and talking about different fandoms will throw people off.

No. 1718731

>>1718696
Honestly I think AI is being more dangerous to us as women than to us as artist. Yes, it sucks that companies are just using AI instead of hiring artists (isn't like publishers pay artists decently anyways), but I very much prefer losing the $2/page page work than the fact that anyone can make deepfakes in seconds with their phones.
When it comes to art I also feel this is NFTs 2.0, in a year they will most likely forget about it. But for porn? Not so much.

No. 1718741

File: 1696690691819.jpg (34.45 KB, 320x766, h8istw32tfsb1.jpg)

>>1718476
That's a flashback, she looks like this now

No. 1718747

>>1718731
We aren't going to have an nft resurgence.

No. 1718749

>>1718741
She IS cute, but it's character assassination because it doesn't feel like the same girl at all

No. 1718751

>>1718702
>retards calling themselves "ai prompt artist"
Like saying "I'm the ideas guy" which is code for "I have no skills whatsoever"

No. 1718770

File: 1696693448756.jpg (74.97 KB, 500x495, a5586f847562b9747a4be435818c5b…)

>>1718220
Well it's definitely not better, the new art is really stiff and awkward. See the poses and how weirdly Irma her feet is drawn and Cornelia her face. If you think its cuter, that more subjective I guess. The new art style reminds me a lot of what you currently find in western cartoons. But with bad atonomy. The newer outfits aren't better then the old ones imo. Only Will her new outfit is cute.

No. 1718786

>>1718747
Yes, that was my point.
>in a year they will most likely forget about it

No. 1718791

>>1717407
soulless, stiff, ugly, terrible, tumblr tier art
>>1718770
soulful, soft, pretty, kinda reminds me of older disney style too

No. 1718797

File: 1696694933379.jpg (44.18 KB, 550x710, 3671647272144318085541d3488521…)

>>1718220
Anons are being so dramatic about this post kekk. I don't think the new art is bad, or anywhere as bad as people are acting like, but it does feel like that dated "anime-but-not-too-anime" style that a lot of artists used to have. Almost like Baylee Jae, but her art is a lot worse.

No. 1718805

>>1718770
This art is not the same as the animation. Anons need to understand that you can find the old art ugly.

No. 1718824

>>1718797
Agree, I think that some anons are being delusional . Just because you’re nostalgic for it doesn’t mean it looks good .

No. 1718827

File: 1696697804440.jpg (80.74 KB, 1000x600, Witch.jpg)

>>1718220
I find that despite their efforts to make them more appealing to modern audiences and trying to make them more diverse, they actually fucked up and made them extremely samey in structure and shadow.

They could apply a soft tumblr pastel artstyle to the originals, but instead they drew Will and then used her as a base for everybody else, just changing the skin color, hair, body fat/muscle.
Look at picrel: it's kind of shit but sadly it's the only one I found where they're lined up in their transformed form.
They all have different facial structures, and they're actually supposed to have different, but still idealized, adult bodies. You can see it slightly in this picture but it's much more evident in the chapters drawn by Barbucci. This was and still is rare in many action-oriented comics, where female characters are all way too similar to eachother.
Hell, it was a problem in the original W.I.T.C.H. run too: only the good artists respected the proportions of the girls instead of doing a generic action body, but at least they never strayed too far with their faces.
Will is smaller, Hay Lin has big hands and feet and a thin body, Cornelia is a long girl, Taranee has bigger shoulders and arms and Irma got prominent curves.

I was never super into W.I.T.C.H. but I always found this aspect of it fun and it made it stand out among other magical girls.
This reboot keeps none of that, they all share the same structure both in face and body. The W.I.T.C.H. cartoon also didn't keep this aspect of the original comic and it's no surprise it's worse.

No. 1718828

File: 1696697980313.jpg (23.21 KB, 430x283, apre-1.jpg)

>>1718827
Samefag but it's more evident in this pic where they're 13. Even in their transformed shadows you can see the W.I.T.C.H. were all idealized, but different, action heroines.

No. 1718832

>>1718828
>>1718827
personally I hate these designs and it's the whole reason I didn't watch it as a kid. I couldn't stand the art style and much preferred Totally Spies as an anime knock-off look. It doesn't look as wonky and I really, really find the girl with glasses's hair so ugly in the original designs. The natural hair in the newer version is so much better looking. I get she is supposed to have dreads but if you think tentacles for hair is a good design, anons need some help with art.

No. 1718835

File: 1696698316418.jpg (366.65 KB, 564x847, 7e99d17e05debc69e2ea303e8904d8…)

i still love witch and it's kind of a comfort comic for me (never watched the show past a few episodes because i found it so ugly). i still have all my old comics from back in the day, and i'm currently collecting the hardback comic editions that are being released in my country. the new version, however, i'm not gonna touch. it doesn't exist to me. it probably appeals to the steven universe/nimona/woke netflix cartoon crowd, but not to me. i'm glad if others find enjoyment with it, i guess.

No. 1718836

File: 1696698414903.png (406.08 KB, 1412x796, mix and match Bitmoji avatars …)

>>1717407
They look like they were made in a dress up game, the style reminds me of Bitmojis with how flat and dead eyed everyone looks like. I'm sure the artist is doing her best but looking into her work even her own comic looks a lot better than whatever she's doing here. I'm not at all against the idea of a remake with a more modern style, but often "modern" seem to mean stripping away all the detail and depth from the original designs because detail = regressive and old-fashioned while simplified and flat = sleek and modern I guess.

No. 1718842

>>1718832
Like I said the appeal to me is about the structure. I always found Taranee's transformed hair weird and I would definitely change it to something more normal.
I'm not against the idea of a redesign, I just wish the redesigns kept the thing I found appealing in W.I.T.C.H.: body and face diversity.
They can totally have it in a cutesy pastel style much like they had it in the euromanga y2k style.

No. 1718843

>>1718832
Same tbh, I’ve always though W.I.T.C.H was ugly as fuck, but I also used to think it was for teenagers or something so I just thought it was my immature brain not understanding the appeal. Now I know that I just don’t like it because I think it’s really ugly.

No. 1718846

>>1718805
But we weren't talking about the animation? We are comparing the new and old comics. The animation for the series was indeed ugly looking, but from my understanding the reboot doesn't even have an animated series. I didn't even watch the animated witch show because it looks so ugly compared to the comics kek

No. 1718856

>>1718842
The old versions didn't have diversity in body shape, only the clothes they wore gave them a larger appearance, especially after transforming. they turned into the normal societal anorexic dream girl body.

No. 1718869

File: 1696701606669.jpg (371.32 KB, 2880x2880, 20231007_205940.jpg)

>>1718770
>only Will her new outfit is cute
Nah she looks like she's on her way to do some gymnastics or something (even though she was into swimming). Her older flowy big sleeved outfit is way cuter and more aesthetically pleasing to the eye

No. 1718873

>>1718856
>societal anaroxic dream girl
Next you're gonna say stylized art styles in cartoons aimed at girls totes cause eating disorders and body image issues in young girls because young girls are too retarded to tell the difference between a drawing and real life, right? God forbid a character is skinny in a stylized style. As if Irma wasn't the chubby one in the comics or anything.

No. 1718877

>>1718873
And you're going to go ahead and create an exaggeration that has nothing to do with what I said. Literally pointing out that diversity in the original designs didn't exist except this one is Asian and this one is black. Also pretty fucked up they made the 10lb heavier character the fat one when she transforms and looks just like the others. That's not diversity lol

No. 1718881

File: 1696702941032.jpg (18.62 KB, 282x600, 38ea0d0d7915a94bc37380e645eccb…)

>>1718873
I don't think this counts as chubby/fat

No. 1718891

>>1718877
I did not say diversity. I said diverse body types, which the original artists intended them to have.
It's not like Winx where the same body is copy-pasted, their bodies have different silhouettes and you can't draw Will with Cornelia's long body nor you can't draw Taranee with Irma's curvier (not fat- she's got more t&a) body. They're absolutely idealized but that's the point.
Like I explained and shown they're all different when they're drawn by the good artists, but this concept was thrown out of the window the more the comic got drawn out. It was thrown out of the cartoon, too, and this remake is doing the same thing.

No. 1718895

>>1718891
Nta. I loved witch and winx as a kid (the cartoons not the comics) and never noticed diverse bodytypes or the lack of. Sometimes you've got to wonder if the intended kid audience cares about the things you're complaining about as an adult..

No. 1718896

>>1718836
Bitmojis are meh in 2d but in 3d are straight up ugly

No. 1718901

File: 1696704058059.png (112.96 KB, 236x236, 42c9d0251c610f8786bec10801b21e…)

>>1718895
Idk, I noticed it because I copied the drawings. Imo it was part of what made it what it is and in general all of the artstyle made everyone look unique.

I am fine with cartoons like Winx where all the girls have the same body, but the moment the W.I.T.C.H. lose their proportions it feels like part of the character is missing. Like drawing The Hulk as a slim guy or something.
It's not that hard idk why people think I'm combative when I'm just explaining why I don't like the new ones.

No. 1718927

>>1718881
Tell me you haven't read the comic and are just judging shit you find on google. She was chubby in her child form and the WITCH older form having a "hot body" was a plot point when she used it to flirt because she felt insecure being her real self. That can't really go anywhere now because their forms do not change.

It's not a deal breaker for me if they don't transform into older girls but everything else about how the reboot looks is terrible.

No. 1718939

File: 1696706811885.png (204.22 KB, 400x572, IMG_0461.png)

>>1718832
>I really, really find the girl with glasses's hair so ugly in the original designs. The natural hair in the newer version is so much better looking.
Meh, I don’t have witch nostalgia and never read the comics or watched the cartoon. Still find the flair and details they add to Taranee’s original style way more appealing like in >>1716686 and >>1716704. The beaded lock of hair is especially cute.

New Taranee is just so fucking boring, she literally just dresses in black/gray colors with sweatpants and hoodies, no cute headscarves or beads like the original comics. They could’ve at least kept her beads considering those are common hair accessories for black girls.

No. 1718945

>>1718895
Well, I did care about the things everyone is complaining about when I was a kid. What made me like witch and not winx was that they look different from each other and I could see my friends in these characters. I was very into comics and girls in superhero comics didn't resemble normal teen girls at all, hell, even indie comics had young women looking like supermodels.
Idk how witch was published in other countries but in mine, the magazine that published it had the typical fashion ads of any teen girl magazine and they would put the types of clothing similar to the witch girls so you could look like them, even pointing out their different shapes and what would look better if you are this shape or that shape. I even remember one article about body image issues and they had interviews with real girls about that and touched the comics too, there was at least one instance where they talked about Irma's body shape and typical teen insecurities about growing up.
When they transformed to me it was just some normal preteen fantasy, that you'd think you will look so pretty and cool when you get older, idk, never thought that deep about it, transformation was only one part of their lives.
Anyway, if their bodies don't seem that different to you, their faces certainly are. The new style is cute but it's boring and samefacey and looks stiff. I wouldn't mind it if it was some tumblr/deviantart project of some fan but it's an official thing and it looks like crap compared to the original. Maybe kids these days don't care about anything anymore (I doubt it) but I remember very well witch being everything to me because of how they were drawn.

No. 1718951

File: 1696707307629.jpg (215.28 KB, 750x1248, tumblr_inline_onshqxFtME1rofj8…)

>>1718881
Good try but I'm talking about what she actually looks like when she's herself and not transformed. Pretty sure the point of the transformation is to conceal their identities, making them look drastically different by aging them up.

No. 1718955

>>1718945
Glad you enjoyed witch as a kid, but there's no reason to bash winx for having a stylized unrealistic art style in comparison. Winx is good too and it's unfair to dismiss thd plot and characters just because of muh body diversity bullshit. You're gonna end up sounding like a wokoid gendie fat activist. The point of cartoons and fiction is entertainment and escapism, so they shouldn't match reality and you don't have to see yourself or others around you in it to enjoy it. That's a narcissistic way to enjoy media.

No. 1718957

>>1718939
I genuinely don't get how people don't see a he/they aiden in this design. I could see this design in that cringe Boyfriends webcomic.

No. 1718959

>>1718955
Huh? I didn't bash it. I just explained the reason why I enjoyed witch and not winx and winx wasn't even the point of my post. Why every winx fan is so weird about it when you say why you didn't like it? Read the shit you're writing because there was no need to go that way for a cartoon.

No. 1718965

>>1717545
While I agree with your overall point, I think there's something else that makes an extremely big difference.
Devil's Candy used to (idk how it is now) get one page a week. The average manga gets around 15 pages a week, or 30+ each month depending on format it's going with. I'm going to be a hypocrite, because as much as the average mangaka's schedule is beyond depressing, it sure is nice knowing you get a solid amount of story each week or month.
Even with the rise of Korean webtoons, they are churned out at much higher speeds then the average western one. Of course there's a lot to be said about the funding behind it, and structures that allow for it, but you cannot compare it to how the average western webcomic will post a page or 2 every week. Honestly, more of them should adopt the Korean method of just using CSP materials for half the stuff in a frame because at least they all realize that nobody actually gives a shit about if you draw the castle by hand or use a model since they'll scroll past it right away.

No. 1718967

>>1718939
Same as you, never watched/no nostalgia for the original but they literally washed her out, the original glows in comparison to her and I think her outfit line up is so much better. They could have made her tomboyish without taking all her color away.
>They could've at least kept her beads
Yes and the way they draw her current hair looks very lazy to me. It's not hard to draw a vague lump of curls with squiggles coming out of it. Granted her original hair was pretty simple as well but if they wanted to make a statement they could've given her a cool braided style or something.

No. 1718968

File: 1696709135550.png (1.65 MB, 1370x1306, nu3.png)

>>1715745
fuck I'm ashamed but I still like his style

No. 1718975

>>1718939
taranee was never my fave when i read the comics but i really hate the new design. i don't think the "aggressive, angry, extremely sexy/grown up looking black girl" archetype is very progressive since black women are often portrayed as aggressive and angry, and many black women experience sexual assault because men think they look mature and sexual at a young age. maybe i'm reading too much into it but it just weirds me out how she looks so different from the other girls.

No. 1718976

>>1718832
I never really liked it's look either but it still baffles me that they went with the creative choice of "muted but in a muddy way" for a magical girl series

No. 1718989

File: 1696710200765.jpg (208.46 KB, 1024x1024, 158279497_281500023340090_7666…)

>>1718968
His artstyle is skilled and recognizable he is just a huge coomer.
Here is a little story: the original W.I.T.C.H. was created by three people. Elisabetta Gnone, Barbara Canepa and Alessandro Barbucci.
Gnone is an older woman known from writing a girly fantasy book series, Fairy Oak, while Canepa is known for writing girly emo comics about slim girls (she is fat herself and I have some dirt related to her weight between her and Barbucci if anyone cares).
Gnone and Canepa were the ones writing the story while Barbucci drew the designs with the help of Canepa as the colorist.
When Gnone went to oversee the original design proposals by Barbucci, she reprimended him for sexualizing them too much and made him redo them with a more teen girl-friendly approach lol.

Picrel is a recent W.I.T.C.H. pic by Barbucci.

No. 1718995

>>1718989
Tbf I adore this old art but his new style is also horrible kek what is this. What happened to Taranee

No. 1719002

>>1718995
No idea lol. Not all his recent Witch pics are horrid but that one is just bad.

No. 1719015

>>1718989
>>1718995
Holy shit I thought that was early concept art at first lol

>i have some dirt related to her weight between her and Barbucci if anyone cares

Please tell, I’m curious

No. 1719033

File: 1696713575336.jpg (438.09 KB, 842x1132, pageBonuslow.jpg)

>>1719015
So… as far as I know, Barbucci and Canepa left W.I.T.C.H. after some time to pursue a more avant-garde comic scene. They first made Monster Allergy with other people (I think?), but their first true pricy comic for mature audienced is Skydoll: it's a sci-fi art nouveau story about sex dolls, true love, death, fame, fortune… it's an adult work but it's written by Barbara Canepa, a woman, so while I never read it I expect it to be a little depressing and a little pretentious. I can tell you the art is well made because Barbucci can draw.
This is a detail that will come up later, but Canepa loves pricey, asian ball-jointed dolls, she collects them and Skydoll sometimes follows that aesthetic. She's not a good artist herself, she's a writer first and foremost, but her art direction is always a little gothic and she's obsessed with death and graveyards.

During their run of Skydoll, Barbucci brought Canepa with him to a trip to the US. Well, as soon as they returned to Italy, she dumped him and immediately went with another man. (Skydoll continued btw and I think it finished in the mid 2010s.)
Apparently they're still friends, but I'm inclined to believe Barbucci still resents Canepa and the reason is simple:
Some years after this break out happened, Barbucci wrote and drew a comic called Chosp. I never cared for Chosp but once at the comic book store I gave it a look and something piqued my interest amongst its panels of ugly-cute little kids and euromanga bimbo tits: the comic had a group of goth nerds who loved going around… graveyards. And the de-facto leader was a fat gothic lolita who collected asian BJD… she used them to attack Chosp (the protag) and she was a villain in the story.
Her name was "Trippy la Ciccia" which I'd loosely translate as "Lardy the Fattie".

On top of Trippy la Ciccia, Barbucci once didn't tag Canepa in a W.I.T.C.H. anniversarsy post on Instagram, which was definitely not an error seeing as he tagged literally everybody else he worked with for that project. Canepa even made a passive-aggressive comment about not being tagged, so yeah.

No. 1719035

File: 1696713647922.png (922.12 KB, 1050x1229, 567890.png)

I swear female artists that have "femboy" OCs are always a special kind of degenerate. Usually have strong pick me energy because coomer moids defend them.

No. 1719047

>>1719035
This looks like straight up shota, not “femboy” bullshit. I just hate coomer artists in general, what a waste of time and skills.

No. 1719048

>>1719047
99% of femboys are either women with Schrodinger's dick or underage boys.

No. 1719061

>>1719035
Female artists drawing grotesque porn of female characters are way more harmful and there's a huge abundance of them around, I'd much rather see your picrel than another Sakimichan pickme claiming that it's ~empowering~ or a female Shadman NLOG ~trolling the SJWs~.

No. 1719067

>>1719035
Why do their knees look like that kek
>>1719061
>i'd rather see shota over xyz!!!
Why do you guys always say then whenever someone bring up salt about some girl drawing shota art

No. 1719068

>>1719033
When you mentioned weight and Barbucci I figured it had something to do with him being a jerk, but damn. I don’t know what their relationship was like but he comes off way too pathetic for his age here, making a fat villainous caricature of your ex and purposely tagging everyone on insta but her sounds like petty high school shit. What, did she spit on him while dumping his ass?

No. 1719069

>>1718955
Nonny, you sound way too defensive about "wokoid body positivity bullshit".
People can dislike artstyles with lack of body diversity in a "this is not my artistic preference" way instead of a "this is problematic reee" way, and having to walk on eggshells to choose your words just so you don't accidentally trigger an "anti-wokoid"oid is lame.
Stop letting online woke discourse live in your head like that.

No. 1719074

>>1719068
Agreed. They do still work together for Skydoll so it's not all bad blood, but he's a petty idiot and he was not fooling anyone with having a blatant Canepa caricature in his own comic. It's way too specific.

No. 1719117

any nonnies here video recs about ambient occlusion? that AREN'T from marc brunet (hate the scrote dont mind me). i remember seeing a really good one a while ago but can't find it again kek

No. 1719135

>>1719117
Whats up with bucci, I only know him on a surface level and have watched his light and shadow videos to help me out

No. 1719152

>>1719061
genuinely curious, when did sakimichan say that?

No. 1719154

>>1718856
>Societal anorexic dream girl body
We are never going to get pretty fairy girls ever again omg. I can't think of a single kid that watched witch that developed an ED because of it.

No. 1719155

>>1718939
Whats the point in using the old reference material if you're making entirely different characters

No. 1719171

File: 1696725909464.jpg (304.25 KB, 1200x1200, F53x5_jXkAEI94z.jpg)

>>1719035
You just reminded me of this artist, she had femboy ocs and was (understandably) annoyed about tifs/tims/enbies calling the term a slur lmao. She's a trans-inclusive enby masc he/they lesbian and all the porn on her nsfw account is women (including a "trans femboy") getting fucked by men/TIMs with massive schlongs, and then there's the rare 1 or 2 yaoi posts, but all her art legit looks like it was made by some horny male.

Some of it can even be mistaken for shotacon with a 2-foot tall guy with dot eyes, kid proportions, and a magnum dong fucking a tall bimbo lady. But they're colorful humanoids with wings and bug antennae so she gets away with calling it a size difference. (very old milk) She once accidentally reblogged gangrape porn ("I-I didn't read the subtitles or notice the girl screaming crying while this creepy masked dude raped her") so I get the feeling she's into some non-twitter-approved degen shit.
She's drawn so much hornybait art that wouldn't appeal to normal women and complained whenever people criticized the huge titty/stick waist/bubble butt female bodies she often drew ("I'm a lesbian", "women can be curvy you know", etc). it was funny seeing her get surprised that most of her followers are moids- and then angry finding out a lot of them are coomer moids who fetishize lesbians, hate gays, and hate masculine women.

Picrel is her lesbian webtoon ocs by the way.

No. 1719178

>>1719171
Is the tumblr sexyman "biblically accurate" angel supposed to be female now
Lmao

No. 1719185

>>1719178
unforch the huge chest is just a new trend from yaoi and trannies where the pecs are get ~so big and squishy~ they resemble boobs to some extent

No. 1719193

>>1718959
Sorry, but witch fans have a superiority complex over liking witch more than winx and it seems so NLOGY for me so I get defensive of it.

No. 1719195

>>1719155
Easy fame using the name of a famous nostalgic IP

No. 1719196

>>1719171
she seems like a lesbian larper bi type from this. why would a lesbian be this obsessed with these kind of dick jokes and moid gaze shit? yes the answer is being a coomer but that's sad to consider.

No. 1719205

I apologize if this has been asked before but does anyone do art full time professionally? Do you still enjoy doing it as a job or does it become stressful?

No. 1719206

>>1718696
i have seen some artists use it and it makes me sad, i always unfollow when i find out someone is using AI

No. 1719210

>>1719035
the dont even look like femboys they are just cutesy anime boys, god i hate how scrotes that used to be like ''ewww free yucky anime is ruined!!1!'' now are all into femboys and turning cute male characters women like, like Link, into disgusting women with penises

No. 1719212

>>1700560

does anyone else feel like drawing pandering quirky moe slop because even after years of drawing and posting you get nowhere?

fuck yukiko snail lol she ruined a generation of artists
her art is goyslop equivalent of anime art

No. 1719213

>>1718712
Its the same as developing any other art style, only this one is supposed to NOT look like it was drawn by specifically you. Personally I just use pretty generic art styles but you don’t have to do that for an anon account, just make sure that it’s far enough from the public accounts that someone can’t pin it down as yours. It’s a good thing to be able to draw in any art style anyways. Ask your friends what the most noticeable traits of your art style, it’s a trend so they shouldn’t be suspicious unless you say “So I can change it up for my porn” lol. You’d be surprised at the little things that are unique to you. I think another anon mentioned signature styles already but change that up too, same with any hand writing too of course. And yes you should be using a different email, make sure the email can’t be tied to any public accounts by not naming it after any usernames or using it to sign up public accounts.

No. 1719340

>>1718951
Oh so you're talking about the reboot to the original before the other reboot. Yeah, she wasn't originally like that and that's not even chubby. They padded out her chest and drew her legs thicker but she looks normal whereas everyone else looks like they weight 70bs and she's 90lbs. I don't call that chubby or obese or fat or anything. The 90s/2000s really brainrotted so many people that they really saw Ugly Betty and this and thought "Yep that's fat fat fat" when it isn't at all. That character is not diverse in the least. I'm so sorry about your childhood.

No. 1719346

>>1718901
The new ones are ugly, I agree. You don't need to defend it. Same way some people don't like the look of pixar. People have personal styles, but it's not like they are going to change your mind by telling you their biased opinion.

No. 1719501

File: 1696759232984.png (86.46 KB, 961x95, Screenshot 2023-10-08 110020.p…)


No. 1719516

File: 1696762375916.jpg (731.26 KB, 1024x768, witch-pt.jpg)

>>1719340
NAYRT The way everyone was drawn became wildly inconsistent but, especially in early art, Irma was a chubby girl in the context of the artstyle. Her face was rounder and her body was a bigger, it's an undeniable fact about her design.
Obviously this is tied to the context of the comic and artstyle. You don't have to pretend it's not real because Irma looks normal to you. You also keep misunderstanding what people here meant by "diverse". It's not diverse as in a diversity quota where everyone has to be a certain race or a certain weight. It's diverse as in every member of the team is meant to have a different design with different body proportions and face structure. You can't exchange the bodies of the W.I.T.C.H. team members because otherwise it looks weird. It's part of their character like their personality is and it partially reflects it as well.

The new one has them have all the same body structure, just a little muscular or fatter depending on the character, not to mention the extremely similar facial structures. They did the bare minimum to make them look different and it hinges all on aspects external to their drawing constructions (hair, eyes, weight).

No. 1719529

>>1718951
>>1719516
As a child reading the comics, irma always looked chubby to me, but she was chubby in the 2000s way not actually fat. As an eurofag I compared her to the other girls around me and some had very similar vibes to her. There were very few actually fat kids, and basically no one was obese. Will is petite, taranee looked like an average girl and cornelia was similar to my tall classmate. Irma clearly has more of a stocky build and more curves than the other girls, the same way hay lin looks way more bony and sharp in comparison. In a modern context she would probably look more like fionna from adventure time, who is also chubby but not fat

No. 1719590

File: 1696772701883.jpg (39.93 KB, 300x450, 1686231418196072.jpg)

What's your achilles' heel in art? For me it's faces. It's probably going to take me years before i can draw faces in the very specific way I want. I don't think i have ever seen another artist achieve this style.

No. 1719634

>>1719590
I can't draw backgrounds, I can't. I love how the drawings I make look with solid colors.
I always wanted to make paintings like Trevor Brown but without the pedophiliac moid aspect but I can't fucking seem to incorporate backgrounds to my drawings

No. 1719645

File: 1696777426269.png (183.23 KB, 250x382, IMG_0073.png)

>>1717407
>>1717374
They seriously thought they were over sexualized? Bro the new Taranee transformation is in leggings and a bandeau. They keep drawing her with tight clothes and emphasis on her muscles. Did anybody else notice the belly ring that Cornelia has? The new transformations don’t look otherworldly at all and could pass as either streetwear or gym clothes. Look at how Hay Lin looks in later issues it’s still flowy and matches the silhouette of her first.

No. 1719764

>>1719590
Hands.
Specifically wrists. I'm so shit at connecting wrist to hand.

No. 1719830

>>1719590
Shading. I suck at shading so much, I have no idea what retardation keeps me from learning how to do it. I will draw intricate anatomy and detailed backgrounds but ask me to color them in and I'll die. No matter how much I try to study photographs and train myself my development is stuck at snail's pace.

No. 1719834

>>1719645
Lol but taranee is allowed to walk around in barely any clothes because she's butch now!! Nevermind the fact that her character would have never dressed in a compression binder and tiny shorts as an outfit. Girl would wear the coziest layers and they just decided whatever lets make her a token. Arent they in like 8th or 9th grade ffs

No. 1719835

>>1719590
The resolve to finish anything. Hands and feet are so easy to me that I feel so smug toward AI but I get so bored with drawing and the older I get the more I have zero interest in it at all.

No. 1719836

>>1719340
They don't look 70 pounds KEK is being thin really this abnormal now? They're KIDS too btw, I don't see many fat middle or high schoolers personally but I guess it depends on where you live.

No. 1719880

>>1719590
Drawing clean and consistent lineart. It's such a pain in the ass. And when I do end up finishing one they always look shit in the end anyway.

No. 1719882

File: 1696795708641.jpg (110.91 KB, 859x547, a1d.jpg)

>>1719590
i think line art for me, i cant seem to visualize it fully and i always feel its lacking something than my painted works i keep relearning it time and time again , i hate it i wish i had the skills of a old ink master

No. 1719904

>>1719516
No one is saying diversity as in race. They all mean diverse body types. The same word can be used. Stop trying to assume anons mean race.

No. 1719932

>>1719882
jesus anon I've been laughing at your picrel for like 10 minutes straight because I just came out of struggling with trying to make my lineart look like the fucking sketch and saw this

No. 1719956

>>1718371
Which Leon?

No. 1719998

nonas, how do you deal with an 'art friend' trying to watch you and copy every little thing you do on social media..?

No. 1720017

>>1719882
>>1719932
If you're struggling with the sketch vs lineart, try blurring your sketch before lining. Personally since I'm no longer as focused on trying to replicate exactly what I like about the sketch, my lineart turns out much better. IMO sketches will always look better to an extent though, I read it's because your brain fills in the blanks for you and you can't do that with finer lineart. Also explains why my sketches turn into dogshit when I colour them KEK

No. 1720042

>>1719998
Block them, skinwalkers are fucking creepy

No. 1720090

>>1719998
>>1720042
What do you do when an 'art friend' in your group won't stop trying to shove their genderspecial ocs and ideas into your stuff? I've been subtly trying to tell them that I'm not interested but coming out and saying it will be social suicide. I just want to illustrate my story in peace without someone who draws like a primary schooler pressuring me into making my ocs besties with their MTF self inserts.

No. 1720102

>>1720090
It doesn't have to be a gendie oc, it would still be annoying. If it's the same person maybe you can just go on the skinwalking angle if people ask why you blocked the troon.

No. 1720107

>>1720090
kek I was in this exact same situation but with some tiffies a few years back. idk, it only got better once I made it clear that it was an issue of them crossing my boundaries and that it had nothing to do with the genderspecial things (i left the entire friend group altogether though due to excessive mod infighting) Like, you don't really want to take the angle of hating the gendie shit, it's more about the person being a dick. I would still be bothered if someone kept trying to shoehorn their non gendie oc into my story.

No. 1720122

File: 1696818801458.jpg (1.35 MB, 2181x3659, [23-09-16] 1703061740672757876…)

>>1719882
if you are willing to get past the animu trash check rkgk artists, they tend to have the best lineart in digital in my opinion. they helped understand how to properly transition from sketch to lineart without it looking bad

No. 1720747

>>1720122
Holy fuck who is this nonnie I need to follow them STAT

No. 1720748

NOTICE

Thread has reached 1100 posts. The thread will be locked and you will be unable to post in it shortly after it exceeds 1200 posts. Please begin preparing a new thread and post a link to it when it's created.

No. 1720780

File: 1696849819405.jpg (Spoiler Image,479.26 KB, 1610x2704, [23-04-27] 1651608835029884932…)

>>1720747
@cyjalway
sorry nonny i have to inform you he's a coomer, but if you are willing to swim through anime coom his anatomy notes are some of the best i have ever seen

No. 1720796

>>1720102
kek were not the same anon believe it or not, im not sure why they responded to my post. but it wouldn't be as easy to block this one as unfortunately we run in the same circles of interest. she doesnt copy my art but likes to copy my posts. almost as if she's desperately trying to cling in case I get popular or some shit which i'm not interested in. gets possessive about my ocs though. I always make the mistake of trusting other artists to not be a turbo autist about being a normal friend, makes me wanna stop posting altogether so I can stop attracting gendies and weirdos.

No. 1720879

>>1720796
What does copying your posts mean? Does she draw the same themes or what? How do you even get into situations like that, I'm almost jealous. I've been posting for years and even on my popular 10k+ accounts I couldn't manage to make friends or even get into conversation beyond some polite complimenting

No. 1720919

>>1720879
Don't be jealous of this situation it's miserable. as a smaller artist it's more insular and hard to tell it's happening so I have to deal with her bullshit mostly by myself.
She has similar themes snoops around my mentions follows and conversations and posts similar takes and interests eerily & shortly after I do. I'm exhausted. I hate the concept of 'mutuals' watching her trying to claw attention towards herself by being around me fucking sucks.

No. 1720923

Does anyone else here struggle with adhd badly? I suspected I had it for a while but didn’t think it was a big deal until talking about it openly, realizing, wow, im extremely debilitated compared to normal people and not just “a little clumsy/lazy/scatterbrained/imagining”. Typical story, can’t focus, can’t commit to anything, absent-minded, hyperfocused at random.
My whole life I’ve been extremely prolific in art, with the catch that I absolutely cannot finish anything. I am talking dozens of half completed sketches per day. I have been drawing for hours a day for years but I barely have anything to actually show for it.
I talked to my psychiatrist, and after our next appointment she wants me to try medication. Does anyone have experience related to their art productivity before and after taking adhd medication?
I don’t know if it’s stupid of me but I’m banking on this making a difference. I want so badly to be a “normal” artist. I just want to be able to finish one fucking picture.

No. 1720948

>>1720923
same nonny, but sadly i dont have money for a psychiatrist/meds. Hope they help you focus.

No. 1720964

>>1720919
Just block her, collect evidence of her behaviour and share it quietly within your circles when someone asks or make a big callout if it's really blatant. If you're just in similar circles and not actually in a friendgroup you should just block or ignore her without fear of repercussions because there are none.

No. 1721000

>>1720122
goldship my beloved. i have a love-hate relationship with this coomerbrain

No. 1721006

>>1721000
to be fair its legally not allowed to be coomerbait, its more like moebait

No. 1721100

>>1720923
I've suffered with the same situation adhd meds help a bit but I would recommend going on your own pace start small like finishing small thumbnails (no details! Just blobs to visialize the whole piece and using sketchy lines in a small canvas 500x500px)it will give you a bit of joy of atleast finishing something and treat the piece as if your were commissioned to finish it so it'll give you a sense of urgency (basically training yourself to complete a piece even if you don't like it) as for finding references stick to a theme no matter how much a pin on pintrest interests you save it and move on,it's completely normal for a piece to take 2 weeks or even a month if it's heavy in detail don't beat yourself over it nonnie each artist has their limitations doesn't make them any less artistic

No. 1721205

>>1720923
I've got the opposite problem from my autism lol I reeeally struggle to start a new project if I have unfinished pieces so I force myself to finish art projects I've lost passion for just to get through with it. By the time I'm done I've lost the passion for the new idea I had so I end up wasting a lot of my passion energy

No. 1721211

>>1720923
obviously take this with a grain of salt because i dont know you but i wish someone had told me this a long time ago.. get your doctor to check your thyroid/levels. for the longest time i THOUGHT i had adhd and even had professional agree but my doctor found my thyroid levels unusual and explained it can give you the same symptoms (hard time focusing, absent minded, emotional disregulation) and instead of taking adhd meth i got given a simple hormone to take that kind of gave me my life back. either way hope you get the help you need good luck nonnie

No. 1721259

>>1720923
>can’t focus, can’t commit to anything, absent-minded
This is me too, though it's depression instead of adhd. Instead of unable to focus cos I'm distracted by other stuff, it's that I can't muster any focus in the fucking first place so I endlessly procrastinate without realising/admitting that's what I'm doing and the longest I've done it with art is several months. So what I do is incrementally introduce myself to the task. OK I'll think about doing art but I won't do it yet. I'll leaf through my sketchbook but won't draw anything yet. I'll sharpen my pencils and organise my supplies but won't use them yet. Edging myself basically lol? Eventually my worthless brain goes hurr durr I wanna draw something. Then I'll get hyperfocused to try and catch up on what I could've been doing all this time, and burn myself out and it's back to square one. I used to want to make art my career but that suuure as hell isn't happening.

No. 1721284

>>1720923
>I am talking dozens of half completed sketches per day.
I don't draw nearly as much as you do (I draw in short bursts throughout a week rather than in one day), but ritalin helped me at least consistently see art through the end. Ritalin has various side effects so make sure to ask her all about it. But also like the other anon said pls train yourself to try and finish things. Finishing doesn't mean a full render and all that. Sometimes a finish is a sketch, it's a cleaned up sketch, a lineart, so on and so forth. You're gonna bulldoze hard into burnout if you try to render everything frantically.

>>1721259
Wow, that's me basically. That's why I try to draw everything in bursts. Because I can't consistently keep drawing, when that motivation hits I have to get everything out of my head and do everything I want to do as fast as possible. This used to happen once per month, then I got on ritalin and finally it shortened to a week cycle. It's not perfect, but it's functional. From there I can simply schedule drawings over a week or month.

No. 1721437

I found some DILF artist pickme with 100k followers, how depressing

No. 1721441

>>1721437
lol also ofcourse she's a tranny supporter

No. 1721445

>>1721441
>>1721437
Who is it nonna?

No. 1721448

>>1721445
saagelious, she's the typical ''eww all anime men are dorito chined pretty boys i am so much better for liking gross old men over 40' she's also very obviously into ddld and even loli most than likely so she has to write the age of the girls in almost every picture so they dont accusse her of being a pedo, even though you can smell she's a ddlgfag

No. 1721469

>>1721448
Normally I'd defend the idea that women don't have to have 50 pound asses and balloon tits to look mature but her recent art is looking kinda sus. There are features that separate petite women from young girls and you can't tell me she's not intentionally blurring the line.
Women who wet themselves over "DILFs" either have bad luck with scrotes their own age, have actual daddy issues, or are autopedophiles who fantasize about being groomed by their idealized concept of an older man. A new daddy who can whisk them away from all of their depressing adult problems and treat them like a princess. That, or they troon out and become lolishota copers.

No. 1721488

>>1721469
yeah i normally dont have problem with women drawing whatever they want, it's her shitty attitude of shitting on bishies, being protroon(lets be honest her fanbase is 50%men 45% troons) and drawing very obvious ddlg stuff

No. 1721513

File: 1696907570475.jpeg (728.83 KB, 1170x1766, IMG_0515.jpeg)

>>1721437
>>1721448
>saagelius
Wait… is this Maariamph’s nsfw account lol? Chie and Jon are her characters from her phantomland comic. She’s been posted in these threads before for drama:
>>1180094
>>1180126

No. 1721537

>>1721513
For someone who just wants to be left alone with her kink she sure is a victim.

No. 1721704

>>1721448
(samefag as previous reply I just had to say another thing)
>she's the typical ''eww all anime men are dorito chined pretty boys i am so much better for liking gross old men over 40'
I really don’t get people who act like they’re special for liking dilfs but only draw women as young tiny innocent waifs as if young woman/older man hasn’t been a staple in romance forever lmao(even in platonic media too, where it’s an older dude looking after a little girl and older women are minimal, dead, or nowhere to be seen, while the reverse of the trope is almost nonexistent and usually coombait shit).
It’s older women who get the shorter end of the stick in every media ever.

Like, this artist’s main oc ship is a middle-aged white man and a tiny 20-something japanese woman, that’s not special that’s literally every moid’s fantasy since forever. You’re not better than sameface prettyboy anime for that.

No. 1721741

>>1721437
Her views and subject matter aside, she’s a good artist and draws porn. Of course she has a ton of followers, why are you surprised

No. 1721903

>>1721513
KEK why was she even whining about gay people if she has so many followers then

No. 1722070

>>1721211
…you could have saved me, nonna. I had no idea thyroid issues could manifest this way. I have a family history of thyroid disorders. I, calling my doctor to get my levels checked asap.

No. 1722085

>>1721469
>Women who wet themselves over "DILFs" either have bad luck with scrotes their own age, have actual daddy issues, or are autopedophiles who fantasize about being groomed by their idealized concept of an older man
Meh, I like anime older men because I think they look hot but I would not date a real old moid for all those reasons (I like older women too). Plus I hate Saagelius's art because the moids she draws are fat and her girls are tiny smol beans uwu.

No. 1722088

>>1721513
>>1721437
I have a friend just like this and I always get into arguments with her about how old men ain’t shit and virile young cartoon boys are superior in every way.

No. 1722194

File: 1696954282679.png (23.15 KB, 493x507, 1688070882532515.png)

Is it possible to never get good at drawing even if you study? recently started studying and i feel extremely retarded and demotivated. I dont think i am intelligent enough to remember all the bones/muscles, and i have autistically high skill goals too. Also, yes, i mix original stuff with my studies i dont just study like a monkey.

No. 1722199

>>1722194
Yes and no. I know some people say good artists can do a variety of types of art, but some people can't get good at other types. I don't think those people are less of artists, it's just not a popular type of design. That's why we have so, so, so many designs out in the world. If everyone stuck to only what they studied, there wouldn't be as much variety. I think you can form your own art based off of your 'bad art' and have a really unique design preference or art style.

No. 1722232

>>1722199
but i dont want an unique quirky style i want to be the leyendecker of yaoi

No. 1722245

>>1722232
Then you just don't have talent. Sucks to suck.

No. 1722247

>>1722245
isn't talent a cope though

No. 1722252

>>1722232
leyendecker worked extensively from live models and iirc photos anon, so if you wanna paint like leyendecker focus on life and photo studies. start fucking small though, and maybe do studies of your favourite food or whatever other objects you like to keep the beginner grind interesting. if/once you're past the still life point, a good goal is to reproduce your favourite leyendecker illustrations, bonus points if you sub in your own yaoi dudes. i believe in you, leyendecker fujo-chan

No. 1722255

>>1722088
All I know is I'm not interested in her wrinkly old man dick fantasies.

No. 1722257

>>1722247
No. Some people are just inheritantly better at things than others. Not everyone can sing even if they have a bunch of training. Not everyone can be an athlete, some people have medical conditions or are just lazy and don't give a fuck mentally. If you are going to go out of your way to say " i dont just study like a monkey" that's you're own doing if over the years you still haven't improved at all. Even with studying and no real advancement? You might just need to find something else you could be good at.

No. 1722262

>>1722194
Yes, but the problem is most likely that you aren't studing efficiently. I was in the same boat as you, I bought books, did figure drawing daily, studied muscles, and yet even though I reached a point where I would copy an image relatively well, I still didn't know how to apply them onto my original drawings.
There are tons of different art study methods and free courses on the internet, I would try different ones until you find one that fits your way of drawing/studying.

No. 1722287

>>1722194
Study things you actually think are fun to learn. Don't feel motivated to learn every muscle? Then don't study it. Chances are while drawing a person and you get stuck on how his arm muscles are supposed to flex you can easily google a reference in the moment and do a decent job of copying it and learn that way instead. It's easier if you have a specific goal like that

No. 1722304

>>1722287
copying without understand how the muscles work is extremely useless

No. 1722334

>>1722194
I have an insanely bad visual memory, I usually can’t draw without reference unless I’ve stared at or drawn the character/pose/item hundreds of times. Not to rely on the aphantasia meme but I’m pretty sure I have it. Part of studying is also getting better at observation. I’ve never thought about how a t shirt looks until I wanted to draw a character in a shirt with accurate wrinkles. For me drawing fast doesn’t help me at all if I don’t understand how it works. Doing timed “line of action” figure drawings for 30 seconds is worthless to me, I can’t remember anything. It’s fine if you take 1-2 hrs just on one figure. Really try to break the body down into basic shapes like cylinders, then draw more detailed muscles on top, it helps a lot more with learning. Also don’t learn every muscle/skeleton group at once, it’s fine for example if you are learning torsos and everything else looks stupid and ugly. Just work on it later, it’s a long process.

Also unironically incel lookism terms helps with drawing attractive faces. I don’t suggest looking into this if you have body dysmorphia though.

No. 1722412

I'm coming to the conclusion that I actually don't like being around other artists that do similar work to my own. I'm tempted to either not follow anyone or stop following other artists altogether and just post without the obligation of interacting with gendies or other artists who can't act mature.

No. 1722427

>>1722412
Do it. I went through something similar and you'll be so much better off.

No. 1722489

This is something I've been seeing a lot of when it comes to the art side of YouTube & Twitch scene but is anyone else annoyed when some of these artists/creators feel the need to emphasize how someone is a "child" when it comes to talking about events or situations? Maybe it's because my age (I'm in my 30s) but it's absolutely annoying to me sometimes when some of these creators feel the need to emphasize someone's age using the word "CHILD" or "children" when describing teenagers aged 16-18 and sometimes even 20-23. It's just so obnoxious imo. And I can't help but feel that it's being used as a way to say that whatever misdemeanor thing happens to them should be absolved and not used as a learning lesson. I understand the need to emphasize in situations such as sexual assault or sexual inappropriate behavior but aside from that, er no.

No. 1722667

>>1722489
Yeah safeguarding from inappropriate shit is understandable, putting an intense focus on someone's age is weird though and I've seen this a lot online not just with art. From minors going "omg I'm talking to an adult and I know more than you, take that!!!" and adults going "oh this poor little defenceless 17yo baby is just a minor and I am their saviour!!!" it's giving performative. People generally online are giving age obsessed anyway with stuff like "problematic people always age badly", ok so you genuinely believe the cartoons you watch, that ugly and old = evil.

No. 1722830

>>1722667
AYRT and thank you, I'm glad it's not just me lol

No. 1722845

>>1722304
>copying without understand how the muscles work is extremely useless
The copying IS the learning process in this case. Some people learn better by drawing it and seeing how the muscles connect than by just studying a textbook. You're essentially doing the same thing, just the context of how you get there is "in the moment" vs "reading a book". If you're drawing a torso up you don't need to know how the toe muscles work in that moment, so you focus your time and energy on your current need. Why do you think old masters taught by having their apprentices literally copy their paintings? To copy you have to think about why things are the way they are (like "why does the elbow bend this way, why is there a subtle shadow there but not here etc") and you get context, meaning it's easier to remember long term.

No. 1722852

>>1722489
It does come off as very silly, especially when you're from a country where the legal age isn't even 18. They'll act like a 17 year old is a little innocent baby, and a 19 year old is a mature adult… but only until they need an excuse to how they were an innocent baby too at 22. Like come on.

No. 1723288

>>1722852
>It does come off as very silly, especially when you're from a country where the legal age isn't even 18
This. It's weird seeing Americans act like 21 year olds are little kids cos that's when they're allowed to start legally drinking, how sad. Even in my country though there are people who act like anyone under 25 is a retard since the brain hasn't developed or whatever and are condescending when you can do something well, art related or otherwise yes I am a frustrated under 25 who has had to hear this a lot Sure you're not the pinnacle of maturity but you're not in diapers anymore either

No. 1723450

File: 1697051581518.jpg (279.76 KB, 1920x1355, sangsilnoh-1647197723119190017…)

how the fuck do people come up with poses to draw?
>inb4 pinterest
what do you search to get interesting/good poses

No. 1723453

>>1723450
Not an artist, but these look like photography and/or modeling poses. Also regular people who post aesthetic pictures of themselves online do poses like this. Cosplayers, too.

No. 1723456

>>1723450
the hardest pill to swallow is that you kinda just need to come up with a prompt for yourself to get an idea started. you CAN start with just pose referencing first if you want but your outcome will be much better if you have at least a vague idea like "woman gazing at lake at sunset" or something like that

No. 1723482

>>1723450
You can literally search for "reference" on pinterest and find tons of examples. And every picture leads to an array of similar ones. Start collecting what you come across

No. 1723509

>>1723450
I do my own poses for the most part, that way no one you need to credit.

No. 1723557

>>1723450
Pinterest sounds silly but it's really underrated as a legitimate pose catalogue. I have hundreds of interesting pose references saved there.

No. 1723563

>>1723509
Incoming hot take but unless you 100% trace/copy everything from a photo including the person and clothes and the entire setting in it I don't think you need to credit pose references for your drawings. Nobody can copyright a pose and it counts as fair use as it's derivative work. If I'm just referencing a pose from a random photograph while for drawing an entirely different character I think shaming people for not crediting comes off as needlessly petty. Yeah, the photography is someone else's artwork, I get it, but referencing isn't the same as copying.

No. 1723569

>>1723450
start with "drawing pose inspiration" or "reference poses" and start saving, the pinterest algorithm is actually really good at narrowing down your interests

No. 1723603

>>1722194
Trust me, you don't need to know all the muscles,as long as you know how to make it look right, knowing the names is worthless. The most important part is practice!

No. 1723626

what the fuck is up with the phenomenon of artists who can’t draw shitting on other artists so much? this girl in a group chat i’m in constantly rips on random artists for having bad anatomy, she mostly makes fun of their necks or their eye size. the thing is, she can barely draw anything outside of pretty tumblr girl sameface with cute sparkles. every other body part is completely deformed or straight up missing, with caved in ribcages and lopsided clavicles. she never tries to draw anything below the chest. i just don’t understand at all, i have infinitely more respect for someone making ugly pieces out of their comfort zone than someone like this.

No. 1723665

>If you are making money from fan art, whether you are selling it or otherwise benefiting financially, this is generally illegal. That said, even if you are making a profit, you may be able to get away with it if your work is considered a parody of the original work
How am I only finding out about this now?? I had no idea that that was a thing. So every time I took money from some horny fujo for drawing Jojo gay porn, I was breaking the law? How are all those artists on twitter earning money then???

No. 1723676

>>1723665
It's because most companies don't have time to take each individual artist to court, and sue them for infringing on their intellectual property. It would also cost the company more than they could likely get out of the artist.

No. 1723697

>>1723626
Simply, overcompensating

No. 1723826

>>1723665
its one of those laws absolutely no one enforces otherwise japan wouldnt have such a big fanwork community

No. 1723832

>>1723626
Low self esteem and the feeling of inadequacy from not being able to reach the impossible standards you set for yourself. Making fun of other artists' anatomy is such a crutch and /beg/ levels of fedora tipping, any idiot can point out obvious anatomy mistakes (despite making them themselves) but it's much harder to critique rendering and composition in a comprehensive way other than "this looks like shit".

>she can barely draw anything outside of pretty tumblr girl sameface with cute sparkles.

It's ALWAYS the people who stick to their own comfort zone and never challenge themselves. Hence, low self esteem that has to be compensated by lowering the value of other artists' work.

No. 1723846

File: 1697092819750.jpg (98.72 KB, 506x453, 1686534002947976.jpg)

>>1722194
nevermind nonnies, actually i am started to see the gains. Now i can look at a reference and know what am drawing, be able to do mastercopies more accurately and be more objective in whats ''wrong'' with my art. I got a long ass journey ahead, but it's a small step. Also does anyone have examples of what kind of studies i can do outside of ecorches, figure drawing, value studies and perspective studies?

No. 1723853

>Bad artists everywhere now using AI to generate art for them to trace and copy since they themselves are uninspired and lack real creativity but want to larp as proficient imaginative genius
Emily Autumn is finally the blueprint of something

No. 1723859

>>1723563
Same, I think giving credits to literally just a pose is kinda silly tbh. In a lot of the cases the photographer hasn't credited the models in the photo anyway, sometimes it's even photos of random people on the street. So the photographer gets away with using real people in their art without credit, but I can't copy a pose?

No. 1723862

my favourite artcow tbrainrot got suspended off twitter. did xitter(pronounced shitter) change its rules or something? kinda hilarious considering most of ellon fanboys are into lolishit and ellon himself is a weeb that's definetly into lolishit aswell

No. 1723920

>>1723862
Twitter has been suspending people for no reason all the time for the past few weeks, even simply changing your display name can shadowban/mark your account as suspicious kek
The other day I tried to send a DM and they locked me out of my account for a day

No. 1724191

>>1723665
I haven't heard of anyone ever actually getting into the slightest trouble unless they straight up use trademarked logos. The only things you'd need to avoid is Disney (spinoffs like kingdom hearts and twisted wonderland seem fine) and Sanrio.

No. 1724195

>>1724191
The Moomin Company is also particularly anal about protecting their IP to the point they're called the Disney of the Nordics for their bloodthirsty behavior, this is a thing not a lot of people know about when creating wholesome Moomin merch.

No. 1724203

>>1724195
Moomins are so overplayed. I don't know why they're so popular other than the fact that they're heckin wholesome Scandi characters. I doubt any Moomin worshippers have even seen the 90s anime, it was terrifying and ugly. If the Moomin creator was Polish or Russian they would've been laughed off as creepy Soviet cartoons.

It surprises me every day just how successfully Scandinavians market themselves as some magical fairytale place and make Americans and Japanese happily eat it up.

No. 1724209

>>1724203
Terrifying? What are you even sperging about, also Finland isn't a part of Scandinavia you silly burger

No. 1724218

>>1724209
It's up there and I don't care what Finland technically is, it sits comfortably in the twee and marketable category with the other Scandi countries.
And yes they were terrifying, I still remember the creepy music when that ice woman on a horse came on the screen, or the creepy purple thing.

No. 1724224

>>1724203
Another hour on LC, another strange and incorrect burger opinion.

No. 1724227

File: 1697127381012.jpg (191.82 KB, 960x960, Summer2015_2-960x960.jpg)

>>1724218
>Technically
It's just as ignorant as considering Poland and Germany the same just because they share a geographical border. Completely different culture, language family and history. I don't know why you're here aggressively dumping your childhood trauma about the 90's anime but like all of the marketability and aesthetics come from the original comics that centered around a carefree bohemian lifestyle, not the 90's anime which barely anyone outside of Finland and Japan has even watched. It's a mascot brand.

No. 1724229

>>1724203
I don't get the hype either, but I'm also not European so that's probably why. I wouldn't expect Euros to care about random cartoons or books I watched as a kid either.

No. 1724232

>>1724218
Do americans really see Scandi countries as "twee"? I thought we were associated with things like noir crime dramas and vikings.

No. 1724234

>>1724203
>terrifying and ugly
You sure we watched the same anime?

No. 1724242

File: 1697128324650.jpg (39.52 KB, 497x403, 9f66e99f40d91d104c84dbb45c6e78…)

>>1724203
>creepy Soviet cartoons
clown.

No. 1724244

>>1724242
What is this cartoon, it looks cute?

No. 1724253

>>1724244
NTA but it's an animated Winnie the Pooh movie made in Soviet Union in 1969. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnie-the-Pooh_(1969_film)

No. 1724254

>>1724232
You can thank that big 2017-2018 hype about "hygge" for the twee aspects. And maybe Frozen. It's not just an American view either, some East Asians and UK, at least, both have the same view about Scandinavia

No. 1724255

>>1724242
soviet cartoons are cute as fuck i wish more of them were translated

No. 1724264

File: 1697129493769.jpeg (25.81 KB, 204x300, IMG_6058.jpeg)

>>1724255
Best boy right here

No. 1724267

File: 1697129783364.mp4 (13.29 KB, 92x90, animation.gif (4).mp4)

>>1724218
>Finland
>creepy noise

No. 1724281

>>1724264
i remember there was some funny russian music video of some guy that looked like retro chad beating gopniks, it was sick as fuck but i dont speak russian so i havent been able to find it again

No. 1724311

>>1724209
a true scandinavian calls finland scandinavia without flinching, we adopted them and will not hear otherwise

No. 1724313

>>1724203
>Moomins are so overplayed
no, they're the best you just have shit taste anon. the books are magnificent works of art and the popular cartoon is cute

No. 1724317

>>1724227
>not the 90's anime which barely anyone outside of Finland and Japan has even watched.
anon that "anime" (we're really calling moomin an anime lmao) is fucking HUGE in all of the nordics, also the original books were written in swedish so it's not that huge of a stretch to call the books scandinavian since they're literally written in a scandinavian language by a native speaker who happened to live in finland

No. 1724319

>>1723665
On the topic of selling fanart, what's the best way to do it without ever getting in legal trouble? I'm sure sone nonas here have done it?

No. 1724363

>>1724319
just sell it? no one has ever been sued over fanart

No. 1724385

>>1724317
It was made in Japan and animated in Japanese style of the time. Hence, anime.

No. 1724412

>>1723846
>Also does anyone have examples of what kind of studies i can do outside of ecorches, figure drawing, value studies and perspective studies?

Draw characters from imagination interacting with each other. If you want to become the Leyendecker of yaoi, you need to be able to draw character interaction convincingly. Memorizing muscles and learning perspective isn't going to really get you there. I feel like no one really emphasizes how important it is to study how people behave. Normies don't admire Leyendecker for his unique painting ability, they see the humanity in the people he drew. That's arguably the hardest thing to learn, that plenty of popular artists haven't mastered yet (ie: the majority of instagirl artists)

No. 1724461

File: 1697146312518.jpg (35.21 KB, 500x681, 8bca69d0da281f15906d4260bcfdd8…)

I found this image on pinterest, and honestly im not sure what its trying to be

No. 1724465

File: 1697146598848.png (8.02 KB, 199x253, images.png)

>>1724461
maybe a joke art? he doesn't seem like a poor fundamental artist?

No. 1724467

>>1724281
Not so sure about the music video part, but "retro chad beating up gopniks" sounds like it might be captain pronin. The animation is kinda ass but some people like it in an ironic way.

No. 1724468

>>1724461
this feels like if someone hand drew a messed up AI generated image

No. 1724479

File: 1697147380143.jpg (Spoiler Image,112.94 KB, 1163x802, reference.jpg)

>>1724461
I think that's her ass? Like picrel, her back/butt is twisted towards us.

No. 1724498

File: 1697148923795.jpeg (165.01 KB, 736x1062, IMG_5231.jpeg)

girls is it masculine to have facial expressions

No. 1724499

LOCKING IMMINENT

Thread has exceeded 1200 posts and is about to be locked! Please create a new thread and post a link to it.

No. 1724500

>>1724498
it's a very retarded change honestly it looks like those japanese vs american boxcovers

No. 1724501

>>1724498
Nice! Personally it’s nice to see Peach with more emotional range rather than her typical vacant/happy expression. I’m personally happy with this change. Brings more depth to her character.

No. 1724504

>>1724498
So she finally doesnt look like a creepy sex doll? I'm glad they changed her face a bit. jfc

No. 1724505

>>1724500
Are the person posting on twt?

No. 1724507

>>1724501
Depth kek it's a cheap Disney face, the original looks so much more expressive imo and I actually prefer it

No. 1724508

>>1724498
I don't hate the original, but it does look like the second face fits more with the art/pose. The first almost looks like her head was slapped on there. The face change in the back also looks better



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]