[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]

/ot/ - off-topic

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File(20 MB max)
Video
Password
(For post deletion)

The site maintenance is completed but lingering issues are expected, please report any bugs here

File: 1686110283623.jpg (50.43 KB, 780x439, 162420932921.jpg)

No. 1599375

Have you been in an infight on Lolcow before? What did you argue about? How long ago was it? Has your viewpoint changed since then?
Navigate any lingering feelings on past arguments here.

No. 1599379

Sometimes when people are arguing I like to pretend I'm one of the people involved in the argument and post nonsensical bullshit to confuse both parties involved

No. 1599380

Who care

No. 1599384

kek I love this thread

No. 1599386

>>1599379
Thank you for this.

No. 1599387

I've been in infights before that have altered my view and personal experience of this website so much that I've started to hate it altogether.

No. 1599389

>>1599387
No you haven't

No. 1599394


No. 1599396

mental illness!

infighting in 1…2…

No. 1599398

>>1599387
I know this feeling, it's really complicating but there's not much you can do about it. I kind of have a love/hate relationship with Lolcow.

No. 1599399

>>1599398
No you don't

No. 1599401

>>1599398
I know what you mean when you say it's a complicated feeling, I have a complicated relationship with lots of things. As time has gone on and more things have become entrapped in this bittersweet hell of mine, it still hasn't gotten old and I haven't gotten used to the feeling each time it happens

No. 1599402

>>1599389
>>1599399
This nonna lol.

No. 1599405


No. 1599409

>>1599398
>>1599401
enemies to friends to lovers to enemies again, slow burn, fast paced, fluff, bad words, shenanigans, smut in later chapters

No. 1599416

>>1599401
You just made that up

No. 1599417

are we supposed to fight in this thread or?

No. 1599421

File: 1686113328045.png (51 KB, 435x368, 5ercdvyutgvh.PNG)

>>1599417
I don't know… are we?

No. 1599436

i've been in my share of of infights in here but i mostly don't remember what they were about. i kind of feel bad about it and i don't infight anymore because my life is less boring now

No. 1599848

i can't help correcting anons when they post verifiably false information and like half the time they or someone else goes "NUH UH AND ALSO YOU ARE FAT/THIN/OLD/YOUNG/MENTALLY ILL/FAKING MENTAL ILLNESS" and i guess it would end there if i didn't enjoy that kind of banter so much

No. 1599976

>>1599421
kek nona

No. 1600750

File: 1686236066273.jpg (72.76 KB, 564x1002, fbf73f75f4db747795efcdff0a67ce…)

Argued just a bit, but have no feelings about it. It's obvious those anons were not older than 18-20 y.o., and I was just the same at that age. Judgemental (especially to other young people), emotional, thinking in absolutes. They'll grow out of it.

Although there are sometimes anons that clearly don't even know what they're talking about and yet dare to argue overconfidently. Those anons need to shut it.

No. 1600754

File: 1686236303788.png (170.49 KB, 750x776, IMG_8639.png)

Sometimes I get in fights just because I want to vent and be angry at someone/something. Alternatively, sometimes I slink into fights already happening to try to make one of the sides angrier by pretending to be one of people involved.

No. 1600773

>>1600754
> pretending to be one of people involved
I hate when I’m infighting and someone does this but it’s really obviously not me based on the language used/point being made but the other anons just continue acting like it is me. Like yes I am being purposefully inflammatory but I wanted a funny and intellectually stimulating infight not to watch you uselessly sperg about an obvious strawman that literally nobody believes.

No. 1600774

>>1600773
>funny and intellectually stimulating infight
As if that'd happen.

No. 1600777

>>1600773
This is the kind of spergout I usually expect from shooting dumb arguments, strawmen or pretending to be someone. Good.

No. 1600778

>>1600777
I usually just leave at that point kek

No. 1600779

thankfully since i am medicated on an antipsychotic and quit smoking weed i have not/haven't been tempted to infight! the last one i had was in the consoom thread almost 2 months ago when i was in withdrawals from quitting weed still. my impulse control is much better now that im mentally stable. i see a stupid and/or wrong comment, and i don't snap back. it's ok if someone is stupid or wrong. i dont always need to be right. i've come to terms with it. i just report if need be (if it is obvious bait or a male, or if they are already infighting/derailing) and move on.

No. 1600788

File: 1686239722196.jpg (191.95 KB, 1080x1043, 338056780_240421341689363_8648…)


No. 1600790

>>1600788
Posting this as someone who even knows about lolcow has to be some new kind of galaxy brain

No. 1600802

Not really but I've been stalked by the schizos in several threads as if they hang out in all of them 24/7. I think they reply to themselves or pose as more than person to help stir things up when they don't get the attention they want tbh

No. 1602500

File: 1686370503770.jpg (81.91 KB, 534x728, santoro2.jpg)

Sometimes, I remember old infights where the other person was obviously being a psycho, some of them I wasn't even part of. There was really some vile shit said here once upon a time, probably a lot of it by literal failmales or trannies, but no way of knowing, and I guess it doesn't matter all that much. I can't help feeling bad that I was still reading and hanging out here because the rest of the internet was just as bad or worse (because scrotes). In quite a few ways, it makes me very thankful for the current Lolcow. At least we actually have mods now.
From time to time, I even have spiteful thoughts, but I know there's no point in that. I guess they had to have been miserable to say a lot of those things in the first place. I hope all those anons changed for the better, or got their just desserts if they're still so shitty. I hope I've changed, too, I know I've been pretty heated. I still get angry sometimes, but not in the same way.

No. 1602504

I don't infight. I just go on a different thread and passive aggressively vague about the other anon I find annoying.

No. 1602510

I just kinda forget the infights I've been on, I know I participate in them but I can't really recall their subjects.

No. 1602515

I got in a fight with L and Lightfags about how Matsuda from death note was the best husband material
My viewpoint has not changed at all.

No. 1602517

>>1602515
Mello is obviously the best, but godspeed nonna.

No. 1602520

File: 1686372728248.jpg (97.19 KB, 647x460, sewzq1dqbv421.jpg)

>>1602517
He's taken though

No. 1602606

So when's the fujoshi spergout starting?

No. 1602607

>>1600802
If you're identifiable enough on lolcor to be "stalked," you're doing something wrong.

No. 1605148

I've been in some infights over the years, but the only one that I can remember was like 2 years ago where an anon said black women can't really be oppressed by the patriarchy and said that I couldn't understand her view because I'm not black I am but I didn't feel the need to pull out my identity card to validate my opinion. Most of the time when an argument occurs on lolcow I don't actually feel bothered, I think that was the only time someone's opinion really bothered me. Other than that I don't really remember any insights I've personally been in here, but I love a good lighthearted infight and I remember those fondly.
It wasn't an infight but there was also a time an anon tried to ridicule me for using a frozen pie crust. This was also like 2 years ago. Fuck that bitch.

No. 1605154

>>1605148
I'm pretty sure I witnessed the frozen pie crust thing, 2 years fly by.

No. 1605156

>>1602607
If she's stalked on lc she's probably a personalityfag

No. 1605157

>>1605148
>black women can't really be oppressed by the patriarchy
wait what was even her reasoning…? can't wrap my head around this one

No. 1605161

>>1605157
Iirc her argument was essentially that a lot of black women are pickmes or have pickle tendencies. I basically told her that it's not specific to black women and that pickmes are still under the patriarchy.

No. 1605167

The ass eating debate. Somewhat recently.

No. 1605171

anyone ever switched sides? never took part in any fights but i warmed up to start appreciating rancefag a bit

No. 1605172

anyone ever switched sides? never took part in any fights but i warmed up to start appreciating rancefag a bit

No. 1605173

anyone ever switched sides? never took part in any fights but i warmed up to start appreciating rancefag a bit

No. 1605177

>>1605167
there's another one?

No. 1605183

>>1605167
knowing we post amongst moid ass eaters haunts me

No. 1605643

>>1605148
Sounds like either a racist or a huge self hater because black women are the most oppressed of all when it comes down to it.

No. 1605702

I argued about intersex ppl once but I was the ruhtard due to poor reading comprehension. We both actually agreed. Kek.

No. 1605713

>>1602607
>>1605156
>they're here

No. 1606170

>>1605713
no ones stalking you, its just that everyone hates you.

No. 1606421

>>1605713
Who the fuck are you?

No. 1606422

>>1605713
someone's off her meds

No. 1607951

>>1605173
What do you like about her?

No. 1607952

>>1607951
is this rancefag fishing for compliments

No. 1608170

Think I've had an argument over this before but I've also seen other anons fight over it when they post fanart and that's getting labeled a scrote for posting art that isn't a bit accurate to the female character or stylized. There's millions of twinks who are basically women without tits posted why can't I post cute art of animated girls or girls from video games? If you post fanart of Zelda with slightly larger tits then you're called a scrote, tranny or coomer but they'll turn around and post links raging boner or femboys.

No. 1608754

I once saw an anon here get dragged for venting about her breasts, because they assumed she was from the ass-eating thread in /shay/ where someone posted their own nudes. They continued going on about "deformed/ugly tits" even after people pointed out the anon wasn't from that thread and it was retarded to automatically assume she was. I didn't get why they kept it up after that at the time, but now I think they didn't care. They just wanted a free pass to be misogynistic to a non-cow. No matter how many man hate posts they made before or after, or how they insist they just care so much about women's dignity, they wanted a chance to share their "problematic" opinion in a way that'd hurt some random woman, and it made them happy to do so. They probably got like 1/100th of the happiness a moid feels when he's being cruel to a woman.

No. 1608756

>>1607952
The fuck. No
Stupid ass schizo bitch.

No. 1608757

>>1608754
I will never get nonnas who make a point about making other nonnas feel bad about their physical appearance. I get heated discussion, infighting and even a-logging someone who is extremely retarded but bodyshaming an anonymous on a mongolian basket weaving website is beyond me. I guess it makes sense if you have an eating disorder, body dysmorphia or very low self esteem so you need to constantly put others down.

No. 1608758

>>1608754
Like I have said many times. Most of the nonas here are not true radfems, they let men abuse them, continue to let it happen. They also enact male abuse onto women, mirroring them essentially. Misogyny, is sadly everywhere. No wonder where we go, as women, it is expected, as terrible as it sounds.

No. 1608760

>>1608758
Compared to years ago, this site is now infested with tradthots and pickmeishas, which are both glad to put other women down.

No. 1608762

>>1608754
I Agree with this, I also noticed a lot of anons bashing women for being "old" when they're just in their mid twenties or thirties. I can't tell you how many times I rolled my eyes at " she's doing this and she's pushing thirty" when in reality that person is like twenty four.
men shit on women for aging and other women doing it isn't helping.

No. 1608765

>>1608760
Yep. Pretty much. Was bound to happen.

No. 1608781

>>1608762
Sometimes they'll reach so hard with the age thing and call a 23 year old 'almost in her thirties' or mock a 'grown woman pushing [age they don't like]' for having an insecurity.

I just turned 30 and it stopped bothering me years ago, but the same people using my age as an insult will go and cry in the 30+ thread because they're scared of 'hitting the wall' and they deserve it.

No. 1608786

>>1608781
Nta but I think you're right.
I'm 24 and I used to be at my most insecure at 20 (fresh out of my teenage years, I was still trying to get used to being an adult) but since then I started to care a little less (gradually). I hope that in the future I will reach a point where I don't care at all.

No. 1608793

>>1608781
I'm 25 and my age never mattered to me until people started calling me out for aging and saying I'm "old enough to be someone's mother"
If you're interested in a hobby, media or past time You cant mention your age because it's seen as childish that you're still interested in said thing.
But, men are allowed to age and are praised for it.
A man fathering a child at 60+? Brave, inspiring and a good father. A woman birthing in her late 30s? Sad, selfish and no good.

No. 1608796

>>1608781
People hate in others what they themselves are most insecure about.

No. 1608798

>>1608796
Then nonas calling nonas pedos are pedos themselves, by that logic.

No. 1608810

>>1608762
Seeing women shit on women for ageing is painfully stupid and ironic.

No. 1608819

I got into infight in some threads about anons basically calling women who had sex with their long term bfs idiots who deserve any abuse that happens to them because they didn't save themselves for marriage or whatever and are giving moids sex for free. I still think that they feministed so hard they went back to misogyny because women sleeping with their long term partners aren't doing anything wrong, and I say that as a volcel. Got called a libfem supporting sex empowerment or whatever. Made me realise that the horseshoe theory is kinda true.

>>1608781
I really feel the shift in lolcow userbase being suddenly much younger, there's a lot of teens now, wonder where they came from.

No. 1608832

>>1608819
They're only shooting themselves in the foot by insulting older women, but I'm long past caring. If I tried to warn them of it I'd probably get called a bitter hag who's jealous of their youth and beauty lol, they deserve whatever issues they'll get in just a few years.

I'm very happy that I was never that delusional as a kid and looked forward to getting older and being an adult with a job.

No. 1608921

File: 1686921877901.jpeg (17.24 KB, 554x554, A122DC2C-2B3E-4842-A79A-54D534…)

>>1599375
A nona was mean to me in /g/ once and I often think about her. I’m too sensitive for this website.

No. 1608928

>>1608921
Aww I am sorry nonna I am sure you are a delightful person and one who is very empathetic and loving based on being a sensitive soul. Dont sweat it, anger and bullying usually have a root in some personal issue inside that person and not the reciptiant. I hope you can still enjoy your time here.

No. 1608930

>>1608921
when someone is mean on /g/ it hurts worse than when it happens on any other board. maybe she was a scrote? lol

No. 1608956

>>1608921
if it was me who was mean to you i'm really sorry. no excuses, just sorry.

No. 1608965

File: 1686927876909.jpeg (66.04 KB, 735x658, D1485280-F0CA-4144-B884-0AF7C8…)

>>1608928
>>1608930
>>1608956
thank you nonnies, I will think about you all instead when the /g/ post pops into my brain to randomly ruin my day again.

No. 1609020

>>1608758
>they let men abuse them
i bet you like to think yourself as some sort of feminist. genuinely retarded.

No. 1609248

File: 1686944590145.png (157.25 KB, 960x960, 4kji4j.png)

I have become a militant anti-sunscreenist
And it's your fault lolcor
Your fault

No. 1609250

I'm getting sick of the random aggro replies to any mention of sex. Even when I was the biggest prude on the planet I didn't dog on randoms for how they got busy. Get a life, skank

No. 1609274

some anons will come to the site and crash into the first opinion they dont align 100% with and start throwing their own shit. accusing me of being a sex pest scrote, a woman who "never faced misogyny in her life", an ex-anachan milking dysphoria topics for clout, etc. ive resolved that these anons are barking dogs but i do get mad for a few hours before throwing that shit away

honestly ive never joined an infight on here except in the retarded "lesbian" bicope hornyposting shit thread but lmao thats what threadOP gets for trying to trick actual lesbians and drag other confused bis down to her level

no one's changed my pov on things bc i lurk to get info instead of opening myself up to "debate" to internet randoms. by the time people get to that point, they've usually only deigned to speak to the other person just to feed their own egos

No. 1609493

>>1608754
i witnessed this too kek, apparently big nipples are considered ugly now?

ive seen shit like this in other female only feminist spaces, women criticizing males/their misogyny and then turning around and using the most degrading misogynistic insults towards women they dont like

No. 1609543

>>1609248
The militant pro-sunscreen people will have the last laugh on this. I hope you have tan skin.

No. 1609548

>>1609248
>>1609543
How is this even an argument, surely anons understand that different areas of the world have different UV levels and different skin types have different needs for sun protection

As a white australian living directly under a hole in the ozone layer, I need that shit

No. 1609569

I let every in-fight radically change my views. I am a chameleon. It’s the only way.

No. 1609585

>>1609274
>a woman who "never faced misogyny in her life"
Much of the time it's pakichan or romanianon

No. 1609592

>>1609548
i genuinely dont think they do because i brought this up and schizo anon acted like the cia has some sort of contract with Big Sunscreen.

No. 1609642

>>1609592
>>1609548
idk why you guys are taking it so seriously jesus.

No. 1609646

>>1609642
Don’t you know young ladies are making life decisions base on anonymous image board posts this is serious business

No. 1609761

>>1609548
Exactly, but it also goes the other way around - I saw girls slathering it on when I lived in Alaska because
>UV rays don't care if it's cloudy uwu!
I'll let you figure out how much sunlight a person gets there on average per year. I would understand wearing it in appropriate conditions like a really sunny day (and the sun there shines at a really sharp angle, when it does, which can be quite harsh) but these people will later wonder why their hair is thinning and their immune system failing.

No. 1609791

>>1609761
It was overcast, darkish and 17 degrees celsius where I was but the UV was rated 6. If it's spring-summer the UV will be moderate. Alaska can be UV 5. Perhaps they looked it up that day? Too many people seem to think you can 'know' by how sunny it looks or how hot it is. You can't. And UVA is constant which is why some people wear SPF all year round, I don't, but more recent studies have found Vit D3 synthesis still occurs with SPF on and considering the average white person needs as little as 9 minutes on 1/3 of their body during hours surrounding solar noon (11am-2pm) to receive adequate D3, I doubt they're doing much harm. POC live in cold climates and it takes longer (hours) to receive D3, which means some populations especially religious women are deficient, but it's not lead to horrendous health issues.

No. 1610432

>>1609761
wait til you see what skin cancer does for your hair and immune system

No. 1611566

Conversely, I get a mini serotonin rush whenever someone replies that my post was funny. Getting a compliment from a nonnie is worth like 4 normie compliments to me. I haven't been on the lolcaps thread yet but BY GOD if I ever did… that'd be a good day, I tell ya hwat

No. 1611573

sometimes when there are lesbian vs bi infights i ironically don't know what side to take as a bi woman with a strong preference for women, if the fight is based around nona's nigels or something. but i'm getting better at staying out of it.

No. 1611585

>>1611573
The lesbians will call you a "not like other bisexuals" and the bisexuals will call you a traitor; bi vs lesbian infights are the most braindead retarded retarded shit amd anybody who partakes has the IQ of a fucking ape.

No. 1612308

>>1611573
this is why I stay away from the bisexual threads, is always a godforsaken mess of bullshit. personally I'll always defend the bisexual woman regardless of if she is with a moid or not, sexual or dating history. We have it bad as it is.

No. 1612661

>>1609548
>As a white australian
Wel you're just in the wrong place.
I live where all my ancestors lived and if I needed more sun protection I'd have more melanin. But my ancestors skin lightened because they need the sun, it would be counter-evolutionary for me to put on sunscreen.

No. 1612667

>>1610432
Let's be real, you're slathering on sunscreen every 2 hours for the wrinkles, not the cancer. I even explicitly said I understand wearing it in appropriate conditions, but I guess the worms in your brain really like all that sunscreen you're absorbing since you can't read.

No. 1612669

>>1612667
the reason why someone does something is almost irrelevant if the thing is beneficial. you eat salad because you want to stay skinny and not get fat, not because it is healthy, see what I mean?

No. 1612673

>>1612669
Nta but it's not at all beneficial unless you moved half way across the planet to live where you don't belong like Aussie anon

No. 1612678

>>1612673
that's most of the anglo population outside britain, not only australia.

No. 1612679

>>1612669
I don't, because wearing sunscreen at 10AM in spring in Alaska is not beneficial in any way. You're just wasting money, the UV index is nowhere near high enough to warrant that. But I guess the marketing department of L'Oreal is doing a good job.

No. 1612684

>>1612678
Then market sunscreen only to expat Anglos.
But Big Sunscreen wants everyone to consoome it and they're marketing it as an essential part of skincare for everyone
And idiots are buying it.

No. 1612685

>>1612679
I'm not the alaska anon but you know alaska has summers too, right? also the sunrays hit the snow and burn really hot on clear winter days, it's nearly impossible going out without sunglasses. I don't get wearing sunscreen if it's cold and cloudy, but not my wallet.

No. 1612690

>>1612685
If Alaskans needed UV protection, the natives would be black

No. 1612693

>>1612690
the natives are definitely not light skinned, what are you on about?

No. 1612727

>>1612661
Take your meds

No. 1612746

>>1612661
Damn so you can send me back to my ancestral homelands of northwestern Germany from my shithole tropical burger land??? Oh wait you can’t and neither can I because I’m disabled and will be stuck in this shithole where my support system is forever. Fuck outta here

No. 1612750

>>1612690
You know how light skinned most East Asians are? And that meme about how whites age like milk and Asians look good until they look like grannies at 70? It’s because East Asians have a culture that highly values spf and avoiding the sun. That’s the only difference. Where people who treat suncare the way the typical East Asian does will also age gracefully rather than feed into the whole white people age like milk stereotype.

No. 1612751

>>1612685
Yeah, and if you'd read any of the previous replies I'd written, you'd see that I said wearing sunscreen makes sense in the summer, when appropriate. I even said the same thing you did about the sun rays. I'm specifically talking about people I know who wear it daily, reapply every 2 hours, even when the UV index is ridiculously low. Yet people are out here arguing with me about the Australian sun and skin cancer which I said nothing about.

No. 1612755

>>1612750
Asians not only have different diets but also different facial fat distribution which keeps them looking younger for longer. So, genetics. If you lose baby fat and start looking gaunt in your 30s you'll still have jowls and look older even if your skin is flawless.

No. 1612761

File: 1687257676944.jpeg (106.39 KB, 1093x762, 53380510-F71B-4B1C-A164-DD4C30…)

>>1612755
UV exposure literally causes accelerated facial fat loss

No. 1612772

>>1612761
Shit, really???

No. 1612795

>>1612772
Yes, really. Anti sunscreen chan has no response to this and is clearly a glowie who wants us to all look like garbage

No. 1612796

>>1612795
I think the point is not to harp on/worry about it all to such a ridiculous degree.

No. 1612843

>>1612761
It literally says excessive UV exposure in your screenshot. Moderate UV exposure is fine and necessary for the organism to function.
>>1612795
I only post on lolcow when I'm on the toilet, glad I'm on your mind 24/7 though x

No. 1612856

>>1612746
Whew– therapy breakthrough. This is the magic of infighting. 100% genuine question: Do you feel better about your bad situation after arguing with her about sunscreen or no?

No. 1612878

>>1599375
>>1612843
thank you my pro-sun sister, I'm glad I'm not alone in my desire to just fucking go outside my house occasionally without covering myself in the requisite Corporate Approved Mystery Unguents beforehand. Pro sunscreen nona, I'm sorry I upset you but you don't need to keep arguing, if you really think you'll look 25 at 45 then just keep on keeping on, when you're 45 and I'm dead my ghost will be really jealous of you, promise.

No. 1612882

>>1612878
samefag, my sides holy shit I just saw the tinfoil thread - I take back what I said nona, I'm not sorry I upset you at all! Your issues are deeper than sunscreen OCD, good lord. Get better soon x

No. 1612884

>>1608757
this is basically my went.
I get hating moids and people who are deranged but I dont get the superficial omg u fugly that is thrown to anons or cows lmao.
How sad and superficial you must be to just use that as a gotcha.Imagine being this deteriorated inside.

No. 1612888

>>1612878
Why do some people act like advice that's given to everyone is somehow infringing on their freedom? No one is actually stopping you from going outside without sunscreen. I bet no one has EVER stopped you from going out without sunscreen except your parents when you were literally a child.

No. 1612891

>>1612878
>just fucking go outside my house occasionally
If I only went outside occasionally I'd not wear sunscreen either.

No. 1612893

>>1612888
Nona please, if I tell you that I'm wearing sunscreen right now will you stop talking about sunscreen? I'm covered in sunscreen, I'm 8% water 92% titanium dioxide, ok? Also you're right I'm a CIA agent, but I learned the error of my ways, now I'm switching careers to Botox injector so I can protect all women from aging. If I see a woman out on the street with skin showing, well who knows if she's protected herself?? I grab the nearest garbage bag and throw it over her head, for her own safety. When the sun goes in I head to the nearest oncology department to berate all the lazy women there, how dare they let themselves get cancer? Then before bed I re-fill my hazmat suit with suncream, ready for tomorrow. You got your message across and I am saved, good job.

No. 1612895

>>1612878
I don't understand what's so hard about applying sunscreen

No. 1612896

>>1612895
The hard part is wanting to. Which I don't.

No. 1612897

>>1612893
You know you can stop answering, right?

No. 1612898

>>1612893
Even though I did tease you about the sunscreen thing at one point (maybe more than one idr), I only use sunscreen occasionally. I just don't understand why you care so much when no one else does.

No. 1612900

Idc about the infight but all I know I get a horrible rash in the summer if I don’t wear sunscreen. I also burn really easily.

No. 1612916

File: 1687271211663.jpg (71.57 KB, 1079x877, E5MBpGXWQAo_oNo.jpg)


No. 1612917

>>1612893
shawty got schizophrenia for real

No. 1612918

>>1612898
my tinfoil theory is that a PS clinic found this site and is trying to shill people to burn now look like shit later so they spend money trying to fix it.

No. 1612922

>>1612916
just a misguided attempt at humor, sorry. I didn't realise how serious this topic was.

No. 1612927

>>1612922
that was a joke too, chill. I'm not going to force you to do a sunscreen enema or something. if you want to look like shit be my guest lol

No. 1612929

>>1612927
Thank you nonnie, I will

No. 1612933

Since this thread has already been derailed anyway, I hate the anti-sunscreen anons because I just know they are in some cold or mild weathered country, while I'm melting away in the heat even in "winter".

No. 1612935

>>1612933
they wouldn't last 5 minutes in straya without sunscreen, hat, parasol and 2L of water.

No. 1612950

>>1612933
Sunscreen isn't just needed where it's hot, nona. All my worst sunburns happened in the snow.

No. 1612953

>>1612950
Well, okay, I guess they have no excuse then, but I still want them to suffer like I suffer.

No. 1612964

>>1611566
My caps are always stupid shit and I'm being laughed at not with it's not all that

No. 1612979

>>1612953
You’re right but a lot of people think that you only need sunscreen when it’s hot outside.

No. 1612999

>>1612933
not any of the anti-sunscreen anons but i don't put it on either because of autism sensory reasons and idgaf about wrinkles or beauty and i'm african, never been sunburnt no matter the amount of time i spend in the sun i just tan really dark kek

No. 1613036

>>1612964
I got a cap posted once and it was me being the haughty bitch I am and I was called a based queen

No. 1613046

I'm bummed about all the negativity here lately. Maybe it's just my own perception but anons will make the most innocuous post and be bombarded with the weirdest attitude. Some anons here are legitimately obsessed with men to the point where they are actively seeking out men on this imageboard and call any anon who doesn't align with their idea of how a woman apparently types as a moid. If you really think that anon is a moid why are you giving them attention? It's not funny or based to engage with a male to clap back and post dick mutilation pics if you really think it's a male. It honestly just seems like you're instigating on purpose. I've seen these overly aggressive anons try and justify their sperg behaviour but all you're doing is either giving a moid the attention he came for, or attacking another woman for not fitting into your little box of proper womanhood and imageboard culture. I've seen anons dog pile other posters for the smallest shit and it makes coming back here really exhausting. The oldfags I know don't even bother and I don't know why I still do. Always hoping things will even out, I guess. I'll always have the movie room.

No. 1613087

Whatever anon in the Vent thread constantly replying to other people with the most obvious ‘Just don’t do the thing’ advice needs to fuck off

No. 1613092

>>1613046
I would like to troll them but I am banned for "posting like a moid" after being called a moid so my theory is the mods are actually the schizo posters. They own this site and will run it into the ground.

No. 1613094

>>1613092
I was under the impression that anons who accused other posters of being male would get the same treatment as "hi cow" posts but I guess I misunderstood and they are allowednto run rampant and chase the userbase off the site.

No. 1613098

>>1613094
Some people are saying they do get banned but it doesn't show and I don't really believe that, even so they are able to come back. Personally the internet just reflects real life insanity, there are a lot of people like this just out there roaming around that choose to be completely miserable all the time. If my post gets banned then I am right and this site has no worth, if not then maybe there are just not enough mods to balance it. I've no idea how many people even moderate.

No. 1613121

As a bisexual who has both sucked a dick and licked a pussy I love telling anons in the bisexual or sexuality questioning threads that they should try actually sleeping with people (particularly women) to figure out if they’re sexually attracted to them or not. Newsflash nonnas: we live in a hyper capitalist society in which women’s bodies are objectified 24/7, if you just “think girls are pretty” because you’re pornsick please don’t run around telling everyone you’re bisexual. Don’t talk the talk if you’re unwilling to walk the walk. And it makes me laugh when the fence-sitting bitches in the questioning sexuality threads accuse me of being a meanie predatory lesbian, or whine about how it’s so haaaaaaaaard to find a boyfriend-free girl. Thank you for proving what I knew all along - you are in fact straight and just fishing for attention.

No. 1613131

>>1613121
If someone feels attracted they are attracted I think they know themselves better than you. You should grow up and care less about what a true bi is. Also it is hard to find a bf free girl if you won't tolerate any gendie or woke nonsense. I won't eat libfem pussy

No. 1613132

>>1613121
Oh my lord, no one actually cares. What a loser.

No. 1613155

>>1613121
I get you, the sheer difference between nonas who turn out to be bi or lesbian and nonas who are just porn-sick hets is so funny.

"The thought of partnering with a man feels me with dread but recently I've been getting these feelings about women and life seems so much more liveable that way, growing old together with another woman. I don't want to infringe on lesbians tho if I'm not one, should I keep wondering?" vs "I think Victoria Secret models are… kinda pretty and I could imagine them in porn scenarios. Am I lesbian? I like boys tho lol"

No. 1613157

File: 1687288949224.png (159.61 KB, 900x1352, astolfo.png)

i usually have people on my ass whenever i post a trap/infer that i enjoy feminine ukes in my BL and all it's done is make me more hard-headed. i'll never change

No. 1613158


No. 1613186

>>1613157
Probably cause you have shit taste even by trapfag standards.

No. 1613209


No. 1613392

>>1613157
Can you at least pick a husbando that isn't the Tranny Mascot

No. 1613394

>>1612795
Why would a glowie care about sunscreen though? Is there some kind of government sunscreen conspiracy kek

No. 1613699

I really hate this website when there's any kind of science fight, no one here ever reads anything

No. 1613839

>>1613699
Do you have an example?

No. 1614097

L8 but
>>1612693
It's most likely because Indigenous peoples of the Arctic traditionally consumed meaty diets high in vitamin D, thus reducing the necessity to develop light skin such as in northern Europe.
>>1612750
People of east Asian descent have thicker dermis than those of European descent, which limits the effect of UV rays on the skin—and simultaneously reducing the physical signs of aging.

All of this is to say I still recommend nonnies to wear sunscreen, regardless of your skin complexion, and apply it regularly for as long as you are outside. Make sure to use biodegradable sunscreen to protect our marine friends!

No. 1614233

>>1613839
the sunscreen posts

No. 1619474

Sage 4 no1curr but I've caused so many accidental infights by asking a dumb question, some nonnie would answer and another nonnie would go ballistic on the other. Always weird to see.

No. 1619479

>>1619474
LOL that's my favorite

No. 1627848

One of the most confusing infights I've ever been in was me replying to something (I don't remember what) with "neither" and an anon replying to say that neither would mean I'm ok with both. I explained that I thought she was getting it mixed up with either and two anons called me autistic. I still don't know what that was about but I think it may have been an anon just being embarrassed that she got neither and either mixed up, and called me an autist to cope.

No. 1627862

File: 1688792390498.jpg (213.57 KB, 1080x1583, Screenshot_20230708_102635_Chr…)

>>1627848
Kek I remember that, it was in the twitter hate thread >>1597754 I was also weirded out by it because despite being an ESL, either and neither is actually something I've never mixed up or gotten confused with before. It's quite easy to tell the difference between them imo. But the anon saying otherwise still made me double-check on the Internet.

No. 1627923

>>1619474
Same, my ADD, and therefore my poor reading comprehension, is lethal to other anons, it turns out.

No. 1628080

>>1627848
I saw that. I stared at my screen like… "huh?" then I just kept scrolling lol it made no sense

No. 1628319

>I got in a small in fight with someone who kept putting words in my mouth. They were triggered about something else, so they kept trying to inject that and accuse me of some shit.
> I made up a very dumb half true story, an anon was being really mean to me about it, so even though the story was half true and I was kinda hamming it up, I was kinda annoyed. Thinking back now I'm like, "bitch yeah that shit was weird, you were weird kek".
BUt i still think that anon was tripping a little

No. 1628809

File: 1688876759986.jpg (1.11 MB, 1672x2176, 09.jpg)

>>1628319
>I got in a small in fight with someone who kept putting words in my mouth. They were triggered about something else, so they kept trying to inject that and accuse me of some shit.
I've been there before, where I said something about my experiance with a certain thing and some anon blew a fuse and started a fight because I didn't say anything about a homemade thing despite me trying my hardest to explain in a calming matter that I didn't have any experiance with it and that I only foucsed on what I knew. After that I learned to just let go and ignore them.
Recent infight I was in, just showed me how willfully ignorant some anons are, how easily rallied up/ thin skinned they are and how you have to spell things out for them, yet they still don't get it and fume about like a child.
I'm tired of coddling them and hearing their inane complaints but at the same time they are so stubborn that I think nothing will get through to them.

No. 1630838

I'm salty cuz someone keeps accusing me of being a cow because I'm shitting on the man instead of the woman and it's tragic. I have less ill will against a woman than a man, why is that so hard to understand?

No. 1633477

I always thought anons were silly when they claimed to be able to tell apart (generic) posters by writing style, or complain about other anons who couldn't tell apart supposedly different poster by it, but maybe that's a fair argument on occasion. Sometimes farmers are writing dissertations on why they are right and the other person is wrong, then I could post something like "yadda yadda no dumdum" and someone will start replying as if we were all the same poster, won't even entertain the idea that more than one person could be disagreeing with them.

No. 1650159

>>1599375
i'm afraid of infighting because the mods might know i'm lying to win a discussion

No. 1650197

>>1650159
If you have to lie to win a fight you’ve already lost.

No. 1654854

>>1605167
Wasn't that in the Shayna thread kek?

No. 1655003

I remember being in a fight with an anon who wanted to shave her head as a joke and I tried to tell her it would look ugly and after some back and fourth calling her bald-chan she told me I need a strong bald woman to hold me at night or something and I remember it was late at night irl and I was laughing so hard it took me ages to go to sleep. I remember someone put it in a lolcow caps but it was so long ago I can’t remember which one but I want to find it and reminisce

No. 1657861

I jokingly told someone I hope someone spits on them (or something like that) because they said they didn't like avocados. I think they took it seriously and I felt bad but I also don't think I clarified I wasn't being serious. Anons started arguing about health foods after that, I checked out.

No. 1657866

>>1657861
that's why tards demand tone indicators, maybe they should stick to twitter/"X" where people use them all the fucking time kek

No. 1657884

File: 1691503770448.jpg (674.51 KB, 918x1761, 1662481610886.jpg)

>>1655003
was it this fight?
>>>/ot/1327759

picrel was a different thread though >>>/ot/1328887

No. 1657897

>>1657884
Damn, baldchan won that one. Get cuddled anti-baldchan.

No. 1657907

>>1657884
As someone with a shaved head, I am immediately adding "You want a strong bald bitch to hold you at night?" to my vocabulary, KEK.

No. 1658018

>>1657884
Yes!!!! Yes, that’s the one kek

No. 1663907

I got into a fight in /meta/ a couple months ago and honestly I don't even remember what it was about nor can I find it. I just remembered how confused I was and I think some other anons also replied and said it made no sense. I get into the most bizarre infights on here, like sometimes it feels like I'm falling into madness and the posts here are mere hallucinations.

No. 1664396

>>1663907
Were you spamming discord screenshots? I remember someone was spamming "proof" of the last admin being the new admin or whatever and everyone was like wtf is this schizo babble.

No. 1664410

There is a Baiting moid here who's starting shit. I wouldn't even be surprised if the fuck is samefagging like he always does.

No. 1664466

>>1657884
Bald chan is making me want to shave my hair off too shit

No. 1665427

>>1664396
Nah, that wasn't me. I'm going to search for the infight and post it here if I can find it because I literally cannot rest until I get closure on this. I literally cannot remember anything about it, it's like the infight was a traumatic experience and my brain wiped it from my memory to protect me from it. I'm starting to think it actually was a hallucination.

No. 1665436

>>1665427
Girl chill you probably just forgot lmfao.

No. 1665571

File: 1692120121427.jpg (50.08 KB, 839x867, cute sad cat.jpg)

>>1665436
You just don't get it nonny

No. 1665601

>>1665571
I get you nona. /meta/ is a strange place because it's full of butthurt people who got banned coming up with tinfoils about the admins and farmhands. Every infight I've seen there stopped making sense after 2-3 posts. You have to just go there and post your suggestion or whatever and then leave, it's kinda like when you go to the bank or whatever and have to avoid direct eye contact with the insane hobo talking to himself outside.

No. 1665842

>>1665601
what makes you think ayrt's infight had anything to do with that? There have been countless other topics.

No. 1665913

>>1665842
It was simply a comment on the vibe over there, not about her thing in particular. I didn’t even know I had said something to indicate a particular infight, I thought there was pretty much always someone doing what I vaguely described.

No. 1666672

I try as hard as I can to not infight, when I feel I'll make an angry reply I just drop it. One day I made a post on a thread, replied once and continued with my life. The next day or so I check the thread and there was a pretty big infight about it. I felt so bad, I wished I never posted that. I know it's not my fault the infight happened, but I still feel guilty about it. I don't expect everyone to be nice and sweet all the time, it's just the overly aggressive replies that feel so pointless and stupid. Ofc all of this is expected at some degree in any part of the internet, but I never liked contributing to this kinds of thing in any way. As angry and upset I can get at things, I never felt any sort of relief in putting it out on other people.

No. 1674337

>>1664466
Do it anon, going bald is actually pretty nice. If it weren't for judgement from other people I would go bald again.

No. 1674340

>>1674337
Don’t, I am the anon who told bald-chan not to do it

No. 1674343

>>1674340
You still need a strong bald bitch to hold you at night, I see.

No. 1674346

>>1674343
I do kek

No. 1674350

Sometimes I get into fights I'm not involved in because one side annoys me and I want to take the other anon's side. And then I get mistaken for the OP lol I feel like a busybody.

No. 1674357

>>1674350
Literally DARVO you sick fucking abuser

No. 1674359

File: 1692795383420.jpg (20.85 KB, 374x358, b41308ff05a01736e2918aeca58493…)

>>1674357
Are you ok nona?

No. 1674361

>>1674359
No you have abused and gaslit and darvoned me and I want my compensation you are fucking scum

No. 1674388

>>1674359
NTA, but someone tried to start an argument in another thread over the word "darvo" being "misused" on lolcow. They insisted whoever used that and/or "gaslight" must be one anon they've likely been fighting with. I feel like that's the same person going full schizo, best to ignore.

No. 1674413

>>1674388
Lmao you are so nutty and thin skinned

No. 1675366

>>1674388
Multiple anons use darvo and generally pseudo-jokingly. You need to stop spinning shit in your head.

No. 1675803

I love shitposting when I'm bored at work

No. 1675807

One time I said I fall in and out of (romantic) love fairly quickly, and an anon diagnosed me with either autism or psychopathy, I can't really remember which one. I was offended tbh. Tbf I don't think she was trying to be an ass, but I did not appreciate it.

No. 1675815

I posted a 4 min shitty doodle of a tif artist who's fetish was cutting off her limb and saw the fucking meltdown it caused. Glad to say I keked at her white knight's trying to portray her art as something in louvre

No. 1675822

>>1674350
Same kek

No. 1675825

>>1675815
That was weird to witness

No. 1675829

The autism of the people responding to the obvious pitt satire in the cat hate thread is fucking sending me

No. 1675837

>>1675829
Same, but tbf the people in that thread might be the most mentally ill users on /ot/.

No. 1675849

>>1675366
That's what everyone was saying to the same anon who was actually spiraling across threads. I think you have it confused. Anyway, the mods banned him/her.

No. 1676206

This one goes out to two anons in the Canada General thread—nona who says POC babies hate her and the nona who calls everyone racist any time they mention immigration.
Both of you suck and you cause TONS AND TONS of posts feeding into your stupid shit.

No. 1676487

>>1675849
>one anon said darvo
>another anon didnt like it for whatever reason
>said anon starts spamtrolling it sarcastically
Simple as.

No. 1676547

>>1676487
You know “spam trolling” just makes you look really really mad right? I doubt the original anon wanted anything other than that exact reaction. I swear this site is populated by BPD zoomers now

No. 1676556

>>1676547
What are you talking about? I look mad for…? I think you're said bpd zoomers because you whole sentence was retarded and doesn't even make sense

No. 1676560

>>1676556
General you. Are you high or retarded or both?

No. 1676564

>>1676560
Don't reply "you know [ ] right?" and expect an anon not to answer accordingly. It's like that anon who keeps starting posts with "Understand that [ ]" like learn to communicate in a way that makes sense

No. 1676570

>>1676564
Full offense but you are extremely mentally ill

No. 1676572

>>1676570
You know that if that understand that zoomers bpd newfags troll spam if that you know right?

No. 1676574

>>1676564
>>1676570
Are you two gonna get married or what?

No. 1676580

>>1676572
Hella mad

No. 1676583

>>1676574
No she stinks

No. 1676587

File: 1692944855655.png (548.55 KB, 1080x933, dtj-a_custom-7e852c13e15bf80e4…)


No. 1676594

>>1676587
Remember when I said I hope you get stabbed? I still hope so

No. 1676599

>>1676594
Schizophrenia eating you up

No. 1676603

>>1676599
If only you understood the art of schizoposting and didn’t do the whole raging BPD thing we would be having so much more fun together

No. 1676606

>>1676603
It's giving Blaine, ew

No. 1676610

>>1676606
Wow that didn’t last long with the pretending to be someone else(get a room retards)

No. 1676614

>>1676610
? Take your medication Roman(get a room retards)

No. 1676623


No. 1676720


No. 1680121

I feel like a lot of people on this site do fake “NTA” or “NTAYRT” to make out that other people are agreeing with them, but really it’s just them samefagging. It’s so glaringly obvious and embarrassing.

No. 1680134

>>1680121
I don't understand this mindset, multiple people can have the same opinions. Usually when actual samefagging happens a farmhand bans one of the posts as such.

No. 1680144

>>1680121
I say Nta when defending another nonnie because there's safety in numbers

No. 1680326

>>1680121
This sounds like cope, anon. The other anon is right, if it was actually samefagging they would get redtexted for doing so.

No. 1680379

>>1680326
you have to be kidding, it would be so easy to just post from another IP or device if you really wanted to. I can't imagine caring that much but some people do.

No. 1680602

File: 1693249859731.jpg (82.03 KB, 1200x675, pepe.jpg)


No. 1680625

>>1680121
Sounds like you're one of the retards that gets called out by multiple people and then goes "s-same fag/I bet you're a scrote" as a rebuttal.

No. 1680785

>>1680379
didn't a farmhand say they could tell when someone's ip hopping to samefag?

No. 1680789

>>1680785
Cookies can identify that but if theyre using multiple devices and clearing cookies, no

No. 1680803

>>1680121
Sometimes it's really obvious, I wish samefags were punished harder because it always makes infights 200% worse and it's usually the most mental ones who resort to it.

No. 1680830

>>1680785
please use your brain, people have tons of old devices, access to libraries, work tablets, etc. Any of them can use a vpn or switch to a dynamic IP to post. It's not hard at all unless the poster is lazy and dumb.

I tinfoil that some mods are the worst samefaggers though. Just a private tinfoil.

No. 1680835

>>1680830
Yeah, because it isnt like you have to be unbiased to apply to be a janny. The new jannies are genuinely terrible, I got banned for a painfully satirical post with 'learn to integrate' among other truly retarded bans that can only come from newfags. They just want to try to piece 'personalities' together but so many anons use the same vpn companies that it's just stupid.

No. 1680849

>>1680830
I'm pretty sure jannies can still see if someone is the same person, even if they use a different device. Iirc this was (somewhat) explained on a post history reveal in the past.
Anyway, you guys can't be serious if you think so many anons are samefagging and jannies just haven't caught them or redtexted them kek. Farmhands love exposing samefaggers (see the catpiss-chan debacle). Please just have to accept that there's more than 3 anons here and sometimes more than one people will voice their disagreement with you. Pretty immature to think everyone who disagrees is the same person.

No. 1680867

once an american anon misunderstood my post and was not only rude to me about it but also very factually incorrect, so i was gonna write her a long reply roasting her for being a stereotypical burger retard. then i saw that she deleted her reply and wrote a polite one, so i didn't. peace and love!

No. 1680884

>>1680867
Sounds like you care a lot.

No. 1680897

>>1680849
>even if they use a different device
They have no way of knowing if it's a diff device using a vpn. They can piece post history together through uncleared caches but thats per device.

No. 1680917

File: 1693273368586.png (84.38 KB, 1215x481, lolcow.PNG)

>>1680849
Samefag. Ok I found the explanation that staff/admin gave for how they can tell if an anon is the same person. It's from Kiki's post reveal. As far as I understand, even if they use a VPN to switch IP, they can still see the cookies and they can also tell if an IP address is from the same VPN service. So an anon probably could ban evade by using a different device and go undetected, but are most anons doing that for most infights? I doubt it.

No. 1680931

>>1680917
They found Kiki because she didn't clear her cache.

No. 1681780

>>1680931
How exactly did they know it was her though? Because it’s not like the cookies say “kiki’s laptop” so I just wonder how they’d know it was her. I have no idea if any of the admins who were here when that happened are still on the website though kek

No. 1681791

>>1681780
The one who did Kiki's reveal was our OG admin I'm pretty sure. He's not here anymore, admins never stay after leaving.

No. 1682011

>>1681780
iirc there were a handful of instances where Kiki posted without switching to a VPN, so the IP address (associated with specific cookies) traced directly to her smallish Florida hometown. This data was also cross-checked against IP/etc. data that PULL had, as Kiki had accounts there as well. The content of Kiki's posts was always pro-Ostrenga and often rabidly anti-Taylor R (and a few other weebs she hated). Her retarded way of typing was another clue (dem instead of them, retarded spellings, rhyming nonsense, SNS for "social media networks" - no one else really uses this acronym). iirc she had some systematic filenames for all the photos she posted as well.

There were mountains of evidence against Kiki. Which is why when anyone replies to an anon who can write in coherent, eloquent sentences with some accusation about it being an Ostrenga, I have to laugh. None of them can write in a normal or educated way. Attacks on posts using paragraphs are just ridiculous, Kiki could barely keep it together for two sentences before she went off the rails. Even now in her unhinged IG captions, it reads like bad fanfiction mixed with mania.

The posts that raise red flags for Kiki are usually short, angry, insulting to farmers, and try to argue that xyz threads should all be shut down since Ostrengas dint do nuttin and there's no milk etc. etc. (All this is just my opinion from reading all the Kiki posts + I study/research in a subfield of linguistics. People can change how they write but it's extremely hard to sustain that change when writing paragraphs vs. writing a couple phrases.)

No. 1682232

>>1682011
Anons are naive if they think that ip and cookies are the only giveaways. They never consider the content of their posts themselves. How many times have cows given themselves away with a screenshot with their icon in it? Dasha made a similar mistake when she posted Minas passport, nobody else would have had that photo. Of course her post history is similar to Kiki's with a fixation on the person they wanted to alog.

No. 1683410

File: 1693483917797.jpg (492.5 KB, 910x1273, Indian-chan.jpg)

The anon who lost his mind when anons said they didn't find Indian men attractive as they have high statistics for sexual abuse posted this after he got banned for the same. Infight a few weeks ago. He also posted a photoshopped picture of an insta model he followed in hopes of getting anons upset the same way he got upset when told he's unattractive but when it backfired and he got told only self hating brown men like that type of photoshopped pictures of instagirls instead of talking to normal women, he started spamming the thread until he got banned
Even now he calls anons femcels as if hes not the one chasing after instamodels and crying because some random women online told him he's ugly.

No. 1683419

>>1683410
The pic where a self admitted depiction of cringe has a trans flag kekkkk

No. 1683946

>>1682232
That's redundant and doesn't really mean anything. It's more about the burden of proof than anything else. Kiki for example was revealed because she was spamming gore and posting self abuse to try to make her thread seem more concerning than it was. People like Rita and Blaine are revealed because they are genuinely horrible, toxic, and want only to cause chaos and gain attention. Anons like kirbynon are harmless by comparison and pose no threat, stringing her posts together for example really would be a fruitless endeavor.

No. 1687292

File: 1693832954441.png (62.24 KB, 300x100, 1662675726706.png)

I made a post basically trying to say that I sometimes don't reply or even read replies when I can tell an anon is angry and possibly wanting to infight, and some anons sperged out at me (saying I just can't read, mostly). Tbh I thought my post was gonna be relatable for anons but I guess not. You never really know what is going to make some anon upset.

Also, does anyone remember how insane the Royal Drama threads were when QEII died? I didn't know there were so many royalists on LC until then. I think it was two whole threads filled with infighting and I enjoyed watching every bit of it. The best days on LC are the ones when a historical/big event happens.

No. 1687412

>>1675815
That one was weird, I think anons must've been trolling with the stuff about how complex that artists art is

No. 1688720

I find it interesting that we haven't really heard from anons who have instigated infights. Like not even in reply to other anons where they try to defend themselves. In fact, there really has not been much conflict in thisss thread considering what the topic is.

No. 1688729

>>1687292
Royalists need to be bullied more in every corner of internet.

No. 1697813

Only infighting I've really done was when people disagreed with me thinking an actress was too "masculine" and not conventionally pretty enough to play the role of a character who was supposed to be the unnaturally beautiful girl literally every male thirsts over, when imo she was super average at best and easily the "ugliest" actress in the series, so it looked like a parody. She's not a worse person or actress for not being conventionally pretty, it just means she didn't fit this one specific role!

No. 1706969

>>1706900
Don't listen to that tard. You don't have to sage your rants.

No. 1713117

some anon lost her fucking mind at me just because i said it was hypocritical for julia fox to pretend she's against abusers despite defending one, it was the weirdest reply i've gotten in a while. idg why criticizing this one celebrity causes a problem when that's what celebricows is for.

No. 1719672

I accidentally started an infight from posting about a bag a like. Anons started sperging about "normies on my board", anons fighting over luxury fashion brands, an anon saying I grew up watching Jeffree Starr on youtube. The whole thing was weird but there was a lot of stuff happening at the time so I think something was just in the air.

No. 1719824

lot of people in this thread are retards with no reading comprehension venting their bitterness towards nonnies they had a fight with because they didn't actually understand what the other person/people were saying kek

No. 1719829

>>1719824
well why don't you correct them then

No. 1719839

>>1719829
why? so that they can keep acting delusional and seeing and reading stuff that isn't there? these people are a lost cause running through threads crying about enemies that don't exist trying to correct them just adds to their victim complex

No. 1719848

>>1719839
Well if you're not gonna call anyone out then there was no point in this passive aggressive ass indirect.

No. 1725652

One time during when we had to bunker in crystalcafe, some anons were talking shit about us (farmers) and so I told them they should be grateful we're giving their site traffic but then I immediately felt bad and deleted it.

No. 1725697

>>1725652
well now this website gets about as much traffic as crystal cafe

No. 1725712

>>1725652
I don't get that because most users on cc are from lolcow. At least the original users are.

No. 1725714

>>1725712
Searching for things to bitch and moan about. There is no comeraderie in female spaces anymore kek, it's just police and destroy

No. 1725726

>>1725652
I miss the bunker

No. 1726497

>>1725652
I laughed out loud when I saw that cc had a lolcow hate thread a while ago (no idea if they still do)

No. 1726854

I never noticed how funny this threadpic is

No. 1726877

>>1726854
It brings me joy that a thing I threw together for some nonas fighting in a cow thread got reused

No. 1861892

>>1600779
>thankfully since i am medicated on an antipsychotic and quit smoking weed i have not/haven't been tempted to infight
So to create peace we just need to get all farmers on meds?

No. 1866952

File: 1706148040807.png (37.84 KB, 275x272, IMG_6128.png)

What’s with the stupid cunts moralizing everything nonas post in the vent thread or confessions threads etc? I would think those are the places to not immediately dogpile a nonny who is baring their soul anonymously. I hate the sanctimony.

No. 1866959

>>1866952
I will never understand fighting with someone over their vent or confession idk, I get being honest but infighting is so odd to me lol just close the page

No. 1866972

>>1866952
If you can't handle people reading and replying to "baring your soul" maybe you should get a diary

No. 1866976

>>1866952
Get. A. Diary.

No. 1866977

>>1866952
isn't the GIOYC thread more for that?

No. 1866979

>>1866959
You've never disagreed with someone online? You instantly close every page when someone says something that might be annoying or incorrect? Good for you if so but the internet would be a pretty dead place if everyone did that.

Personally I don't understand posting publicly if you can't handle people responding, get a diary if you just want to express yourself with no feedback

No. 1866984

File: 1706149689799.jpeg (195.29 KB, 750x1334, AFECA4E7-1057-4A8D-820B-CAEB58…)


No. 1866987

>>1866972
No you get a diary
>>1866976
And you. Get. A. Diary.

No. 1866996

i've argued against women about femininity so much on this site and i am always surprised how desperately it's clung to. women are literally a cucked sex, so desperately pushing and begging for and advocating for the tools of their own oppression. "yes yes yessss pleaseeee don't take away my foundation aaaiiieeeeee don't take away my heels it's natural for girls to like those things :((" GROW UP!!!!

No. 1867000

>>1866996
Plastic surgery, too. Luckily it's seemed to calm down in the recent months but there was a point last year where every conversation about it turned into retarded typical "it's their body they can do whatever they want uwu". Fuck off.

No. 1867003

>>1866996
I know I'm missing the point here, but out of all the makeup someone would want to cling to, why foundation? Shit clogs your pores and you don't even get to play with pretty colors like you can with eyeshadow! Personally don't get it though, most "feminine"(which isn't really feminine) things like makeup and heels and flimsy clothes are just too uncomfortable for me and a hassle to deal with.

No. 1867006

>>1866979
No because honestly I understand that with 7 billion people, we are bound to disagree and that if sonething makes me so upset, I just leave it alone. There's a time and place for feedback and sometimes nonnies are unpredictable. It goes both ways imo.

No. 1867008

>>1866996
I think the one that stood out to me was someone in the consoomer thread crying about how you get treated like shit for not wearing makeup. When you go outside 80% of women do not wear any makeup at all. Then again, i am not surprised. A lot of anons spend time nitpicking other women's bodies and have a lot of image issues they don't bother dealing with. Personally, i used to really want plastic surgery, but honestly, the behaviour of a lot of surgeons and also the fear of worsened body dysmorphia snapped me out of it.

No. 1867015

>>1866996
kek there was one sperg crying about bimbos being erased because anons in a thread said they were tired of generic big titty meek female main characters

No. 1867027

>>1867003
>why foundation?
Because smooth even skin is considered beautiful and applying foundation is much easier then fixing your skin. Women put on makeup to look better and anything else is a lie

>>1867008
I think more then 20% of women wear makeup they just make it subtle

No. 1867032

>>1867008
women are treated worse when they don't perform femininity, but males are shit at judging whether a woman is wearing makeup or not unless its made obvious. a butch woman wearing any amount of makeup will still receive more hostility than a bare-faced non-butch woman

No. 1867033

>>1867027
>Because smooth even skin is considered beautiful and applying foundation is much easier then fixing your skin
Which is ironic because foundation makes skin worse and doesn't really hide anything except minor "discoloration".

No. 1867040

>>1867033
It's absurd how much my skin cleared after I stopped wearing it. Painful acne into my twenties completely gone after a few months. Still get hormone zits every now and then, but nothing like the face full of angry red bumps there used to be.

No. 1867154

>>1867027
Idk having a giant cast of plaster on you doesnt really fix anything.

No. 1867303

>>1866952
Upset because anons made fun of the humblebragger or the anon who cleans up her male friend's piss?

No. 1867617

File: 1706209233848.jpeg (539.05 KB, 980x1000, IMG_5600.jpeg)

I’m so sad the vent thread is now locked, I wanna rip on this anon so bad.

No. 1867619

>>1867617
Kek, she's so pickme-ish.

No. 1867620

File: 1706209390675.jpeg (366.3 KB, 1003x1850, IMG_5601.jpeg)

>>1867617
Like no wonder they bullied her. She’s so deeply unlikeable.

No. 1867624

>>1867620
Any Patrick Bateman shit is so cringe, reeks of tiktok regardless of context.

No. 1867627

>>1867620
Patrick Bateman pic just gives too much scrotal energy.

No. 1867628

>>1867617
>>1867620
good for her.

No. 1867630

>>1867620
As I said in that thread, she needs to move on for her own sake. Holding onto these sorts of feelings to the point youre checking up on them only damages you in the long run. Move on, live well, be happy, leave them behind.

No. 1867651

>>1867620
If she hadn’t worded it in such a moidish way I think nonnas would’ve supported her kek

No. 1870395

File: 1706475585559.jpeg (297.38 KB, 726x678, IMG_0203.jpeg)

the amerifag thread is still being flooded with derailing a-loggers since the great Palestine/Israel debate. I’m still reeling a bit from the infighting. are there really nonnies here that harbor genuine pol/tard views or was it moid infiltrators stirring up shit? not accusing OP of being a moid obviously, but let’s all touch some grass

No. 1870440

>>1870395
It's not even against the rules to be posting that stuff. Things are politically intense in America right now…I just fail to see why everyone is suddenly policing each other over what goes where and whats derailing or not, It's fucking stupid. Don't like it scroll on?? The mod admin farmhand whoever the fuck has really screwed shit up this hellweek

No. 1870451

>>1870395
this gave me whiplash lol

No. 1870454

>>1870395
>that pic
The duality of farmer

No. 1870461

>>1870440
that reply to the farmhand comment is not remotely related to the posts that were banned. it wasn't about women's issues or rape it was mostly jew conspiracies and typical /pol/tard bait calling certain people subspecies etc. I saw the posts as they happened all in a very short time period and I saw a few spastic posts that got deleted sputtering angrily at the farmhand post. clearly they're still butthurt their bait got banned, or maybe that's someone who is butthurt they got banned for taking the bait during hellweek, who knows. their fault.

No. 1870487

>>1870461
Well there's an explanation. People are starting to think the site is suddenly run by males or a tranny or something and I can't blame them. They've been banning people left and right over extremely stupid things which don't even match up with the new stricter rules. I myself got banned in that thread for saying "I can't stand all the leftists screaming Free Palestine and just coincidentally saying nothing about Hamas being evil murdering rapist terrorists" I said literally nothing about racebaiting just gave my observation. And by the way Hamas is literally categorized as a terrorist group, I'm not saying it cause they're middle eastern. Then they called me a newfag when I asked why they banned me. They're giving ridiculously snarky and aggressive replies when people try to hold them accountable in the Hell week thread so yeah people are getting fed up. Something is fishy. I've been using the site for years, something is up.

No. 1870513

>>1870454
We hate men and love pie. Simple as.

No. 1870902

File: 1706523021018.jpeg (184.09 KB, 1107x406, IMG_5790.jpeg)

What the actual fuck is this in 2x? Have the males found us or is this just a terminal pickme? Like admonish her for cheating as much as you like but “I hope he beats you to death” is so fucking deranged it can only come from moid or tranny hands.

No. 1870905

>>1870902
It's a man.

No. 1870906

>>1870905
I didn’t think they were smart enough to find the board but I was obviously wrong.

No. 1870929

>>1870902
casual blackpill thread poster

No. 1870974

>>1870902
100% male, and not associated with black pill at all. If it were real black pill they'd know that women cheating on moids is based.

No. 1870987

>>1870974
Realistically, if it was a real black pill, they'd just judge anon for having sex with men at all.

No. 1871502

>>1870902
Haha, that was me. You can always count on female infidelity to trigger their cuck anxiety/abandonment issues.

No. 1871505

>>1870902
cheating on some scrote isn’t even a big deal. this had to have been a moid kek

No. 1871509

newfags in meta are so fucking annoying like why are you dragging out the same stupid argument

No. 1871511

>>1871509
>mlehh why are they responding
Go to a different thread if it upsets you when someone responds to being tagged

No. 1871545

>>1870906
They are OBSESSED with seething at female spaces and seeking out whatever lame, barely used Sekret Klub they can as long as they believe it's for women

No. 1871611

>>1871511
the anon still talking about the triple parenthesis is either trolling or just retarded

No. 1871798

I'm constantly reminded that some girls take this site way too seriously when I make a pun-based internet joke meant to be a little light-hearted and I have clearly mentally disturbed anons screeching "newfag newfag integrate integrate!!" at me like baby seagulls crying out for their mother's digested vomit-food. I've been browsing the farms for almost 5 years at this point and I swear only post 2022 have anons been so quick to call someone a newfag, as if browsing the farms for a long time is something prideful. It genuinely annoys me because I come to this website to have some fun with my girls when I'm drunk and feeling silly, not to get policed on how I post by 5 different mental defectives who can't grasp the concept of humour: the last in-fight I had I was genuinely laughing and being as emphatic as possible because I wanted to see if I'd get hit with the redtext just for having a bit of fun because I was bored.

No. 1871802

>>1871798
>and I swear only post 2022 have anons been so quick to call someone a newfag
That's because post 2022 (more like post 2020/pandemic era really) anons have ruined the site, so everyone's on edge.

No. 1871873

>>1871798
did you get the redtext?
I agree with you btw, it's insane that of all the various places online, an anon imageboard meant to let women express themselves free of male interference is the place where your opinion and way of expression is policed the most. It's changed a lot in the past couple years.

No. 1871900

>>1871873
>an anon imageboard meant to let women express themselves free of male interference
This has never been a free speech site. God I'm going to miss Hellweek.

No. 1872206

how often do you think you’ve been fighting with some anon in one thread thinking “god what a fucking retard” while also having a nice friendly chat with that same anon in a different thread kek

No. 1872208

File: 1706641999520.png (112.23 KB, 1160x194, yeah kek.png)

>>1871900
Yeah it is retard

No. 1872209

>>1872206
I'm 1000% sure I argued with one anon about one topic and had an interesting exchange of information with the same anon the next day. I want to believe it was the same woman because the topics were similar and so was the typing style. Sometimes I wish I wasn't ESL because I think I would notice writing styles more easily.

No. 1872210

>>1872206
Idk. The only times I've fought with anons they were the /pol/ type, so I don't think we've ever agreed on anything even on anon.

No. 1872309

>>1871873
Oh my gosh I've gotten the red texts several times, but what do you expect when the admin is a moid and most of the report-obsessed users are friendless creeps with no social skills? I've never actually clicked the report button because I just don't care that much.
>>1872209
I don't think writing styles are the "gotcha!" that some anons think they are. You can change your writing style pretty easily every post or even copy someone else's diction.
>>1871900
Whenever anons type this stuff I just think like "woah this dotard must be so fun at parties," like did you expect lolcow to stay the same for a decade? If you don't like /ot then don't browse it, that simple.

No. 1872334

>>1872309
wow you’re so cool nonnie I wish I was unbothered like you instead of a friendless creep who loves reporting dumbass shit!

No. 1872343

>>1872334
You don't have to wish - you just have to change. The first step is changing the way you think about yourself and others. You shouldn't be afraid to hope and have faith in yourself and others around you. I know you responded to my comment in bad faith; but I just laugh at
you because I feel bad for you.

No. 1872352

>>1872343
do you wanna kiss about it?

No. 1872361

File: 1706652851259.jpeg (447.33 KB, 2400x1600, IMG_1483.jpeg)

>>1872352
This could be us if we weren't both anon… the tension I have with the nonnies I fight with on here is insane I admit it you clocked me

No. 1872366

File: 1706653107449.jpeg (83.52 KB, 1280x718, IMG_0211.jpeg)

>>1872361
n-nonnie

No. 1872416

File: 1706656179675.png (111.29 KB, 1123x633, pairs.png)

I didn't participate in this infight, I don't know or care who is right or wrong, I just hate the last poster in picrel from the bottom of my heart.

No. 1872420

>>1872416
the anon camping in /meta/ almost drove me to alogging. it never ends

No. 1872450

>>1872420
At first I was the one freaking out because we can't discuss freely in the trans threads anymore (and look the threads are dead now) but I let it go, this other nonna I almost feel bad for her she can't chill tf out

No. 1872471

>>1872416
I’m literally right, ( is a parenthese. So it’s 6. Im sorry if it’s pissing you off I’m not saying anything with the intention of upsetting anyone or sounding angrily spirited

No. 1872496

>>1872471
I don't care honestly but parenthesis are a pair. When you use (them like this) that isn't two parenthesis, it's just one because they are a set. So the triple one is indeed just 3, not 6.

No. 1872498

>>1871798
I hate this too. Some anons really can't tell when someone is making an obvious joke and it sucks all the fun out the thread.

No. 1872501

On the subject of the parentheses it seems stupid to insist people should know it from 4chan. Even as a 4chan user back in the day I never went to /pol/ its a racist shithole. It's like the moidiest of all the boards

No. 1872504

>>1872450
I got banned for 'blog/derail' for asking a question about something trannies do in a tranny thread. I don't really get what was blogging about it, since I didn't give any anecdotes or talk about myself at all. Derail is also wrong, it was about trannies being disgusting.

Basically I have learned that any post more than 3-4 sentences bothers mods and they are more likely to pick some random reason to ban you if you aren't posting Tweet-length posts. Which is sad, this was always an imageboard but the mods never used to shit on loquacious on-topic posts

No. 1872518

>>1872501
It’s not even from 4chan that’s just where the most people have probably seen it but that’s neither here nor there. It was perfectly clear from the context of the posts it was used it that it was a form of emphasizing certain words to imply a certain meaning. Even if no one in the world had ever used parenthesis that way before, it was easy enough to understand what the intention was. A bunch of the followup discussion about it and the posts in meta are schizo baiting though so of course a lot of the comments about it all make no sense.

No. 1872523

>>1872504
Yeah they say "stricter moderation" but what they mean is ban people left and right even if not breaking the rules. I honestly think they're just doing this for the lulz

No. 1872536

>>1872523
Along those lines, I think my longest infight was with one person defending furries. I'm pretty sure it was one person, the mod itself, who banned everyone who called out furry degeneracy. Pretty sure we all got 3-day bans too.

No. 1872541

File: 1706666127378.gif (453.89 KB, 498x498, ree-pepe.gif)

>>1872471
( is a parenthesis
() is a pair of parentheses
I suppose (( is too a pair of parentheses, but a retarded useless one. People just suppress the word pair cause it is obvious we're talking about pairs because it's obvious they need to be in pairs

No. 1872605

>>1872309
Oh so you're the reason why there's so much infighting here.

No. 1872623

>>1872501
and if we're supposed to know it from 4chan…what about those of us who never went on 4chan?

No. 1872627

>>1872541
but a ( is one bracket. It is a singular bracket. Thats why there being 6 brackets total makes it a sextuple bracket set. Becuase 3 plus 3 equals 6

No. 1872631

>>1872627
No, ( is a parenthesis. { is a bracket.

No. 1872633

>>1872631
tomato tomato

No. 1872640

I hate anons who brag about infighting. I wish frequent self-admitted infighters got permabanned.
On a side note I wonder if the anons who say horrible things about my race and consider me a subspecies and downplay sexual abuse are the same ones being "nice" and using nicknames in another thread. This is why I don't trust anyone.

No. 1872675

I got in a infight about lolcow in real life.I'm still fucking pissed about it.

No. 1872684

>>1872675
kek how does that even happen?

No. 1872685

>>1872675
I use lolcow while me and my ______ talk. She'd constantly ask what i'm doing but in a rude voice I finally told her what the sites about.
She told me that she googled it and said it's "Female 4chan"and started ranting about what she knew from the internet, about how it's a bully site, racist etc.
I told her that while some of that can be true, read the rules. She refused saying, "I didn't know you were like that nona, didn't know you were like that".
it's like she likes to piss me off in that way, i know she was trolling but i was so fucking annoyed because other issues. She told me later she tried to post but she didn't know how to do it.
I told her she's a dumb ass and probably would get banned in a fucking mintue. she teases me about it, saying that she doesn't use "4chan boards" and because sometimes I can be retarded about my special interest, I curse her out about it.
I love her all the same but it's just something that is so annoying to me.
Sometimes I wonder if she uses this site and she's shiting it up, but i doubt it because she's a huge twitter user and is all about modern popular sites.
I sent her the black girl problems thread (i'm black) and whats funny is she read through it agruing with a lot of it, but still talks shit about lolcow and tries to be a weirdo to me about it.
It's playful but annoying trolling but hey thats life.

No. 1872686

>>1872685
>agreeing with a lot of it
not agruing. Sorry

No. 1872688

I feel like slapping myself in the face every time I've started arguing with an anon and ended up realizing it's Paki-chan like 4 posts in. I have no idea how she can be literally everywhere on this site.

No. 1872693

>>1872334
I love reporting infighting and seeing if the farmhands decide to do anything or if they agree with one of the infighters and only ban one or if they do nothing for like 3 days

No. 1872709

>>1872688
She's so freaking annoying I read the first line of a vent and can tell it's her, scroll two posts, its her again saying the same exact thing, scroll 4 posts its her again saying the same shit as before.

No. 1872731

>>1871798
Tangentially related but the autists who had a tard rage moment over "zoomerspeaking newfags" because someone used the term "Not the x" were hilarious in their spergery.

Reading comprehension has gotten really bad for the past 2 years here though. People take obvious jokes seriously or completely misread/misinterpret a post because they only read the first sentence and don't pay any attention to the rest of it so they start an infight over practically nothing. When they realize they're full of shit they start moving the goalposts and doing ridiculous damage control just to avoid admitting to being wrong or just walking away from an anonymous internet slapfight.

No. 1872749

>>1872688
i still don't know who paki-chan is and at this point i'm afraid to ask

No. 1872759

>>1872749
She's a personalityfagging farmer from Pakistan who derails every thread to either sperg about her country or accuse other women of being "pornsick", she specifically hates fujos and yumes as she sees them as "porn addicted degenerates" comparable to male pedophiles while she herself worships white men and specifically Varg Vikernes (a murderer and a current misogynistic tradfag). She's posted her hand multiple times to attention whore and has talked about her family in length, for some reason she has no interest in keeping anonymous and she's online for most of the day. She's made the same arguments for years and years and if you happen to come across her posts she'll repeat the same parts about pornsick women and pakistan ad nauseam with little to no variety.

No. 1872824

File: 1706704759296.png (223.78 KB, 1022x945, s.png)

>>1871798
>the farms

No. 1872827

>>1871798
>infights when people don’t like their teehee silly drunk posts
Get over it

No. 1872975

God, I want to infight so bad but I know I shouldn't. Just watched someone get mad at someone for "shaming women". This is lolcow. Stop getting mad. It's all the Twitter tourists in the fandom thread driving me insane.

No. 1872986

>>1872975
*tans are cringe but yeah don’t get mad just let them be cringe, who cares. Also no one should post lolcow screenshots in the Twitter/tumblr fandom thread that’s not what it’s for, especially not as a “call out” lmao reminding us our very own nonas are cringe like we hadn’t noticed or didn’t see. People are so mad, they should be chuckling.

No. 1872991

>>1872975
Kek that thread is so fun. Some anon will go "I hate this for an arbitrary reason" and a bunch of others will say that this is why women can't do anything nowadays and instead of letting it go the op will continue fighting for her opinion while telling others to let it go

No. 1873001

>>1872975
It's Paki-chan. Report her bullshit and don't reply.

No. 1873039

>>1872991
Exactly my issue with that thread. People take everything as a personal attack. They're almost exposing themselves every time they jump to defend anything in that thread
>>1873001
I don't think it's paki-chan. Also, that's another one of my issues with that thread is the fact that everyone throws around the paki-chan claim. I've even gotten called it once kek

No. 1873470

Really feelin bad that my confession about becoming a Mormon seemed to start a (particularly lame) religious infight. Wtf nonnas?

No. 1873489

>>1873470
Aren't you going to hell for using LC?

No. 1873494

>>1873470
I was too lazy to look for the source of that infight but if that’s what started it… lol

No. 1873503

>>1873489
Don’t start it again please

No. 1873559

I have a confession to make nonnas. I am pear-chan lmao. Yes, I kept it going for too long. Yes, I still think that there's nothing wrong with calling Shayna a big ole barrel body escalade. She is literally shaped like a fridge. I'm sorry to any nonners who feel offended when they have the same physically unattractive traits as a cow. But trying to get people to stop saying that ugly things are ugly is just retarded. No regerts.(retard)

No. 1873566

>>1873470
don’t tell me you were in the amerifag thread too
>>1873559
fucking kek

No. 1873577

>>1873489
Kek Mormons don’t really believe in the traditional Christian hell? AFAIK even atheists that aren’t like abhorrent mfers just end up in the lowest level of heaven
>>1873566
No I actually took a few weeks off so I was absent for those shenanigans

No. 1873590

>>1873577
Samefag to say that actually they do believe in a traditional hell but basically barely anyone is gonna end up there, and also anyone who does end up there is gonna be male, because no female is capable of being evil enough to burn in hell forever. That’s neat to me.

No. 1873596

>>1873590
I'm going to repeat this again:
>>1873091
heed this warning nona

No. 1873614

>>1873596
Kekk That sorta thing will literally get you excommunicated from the mainstream LDS church and I don’t want kids so I don’t think I’m a hot marriage commodity, but I appreciate being looked out for nonna

No. 1873632

File: 1706766735378.png (103.67 KB, 902x375, Screen Shot 2024-02-01 at 12.4…)

>>1872827
Tee hee hee no.
>>1872824
The actually retard-rays that are shooting out of this image are dangerous nonnie… The fact that you actually spent real time making this… That blows my mind I can't believe you would do something so futile and retarded like that. If you didn't make this image, I'll eat crow, but even if you didn't make it and just have it saved I think you should delete it from your computer. Having an image like this is like chewing 20 or 30 grams of tobacco. Also I'm sorry but if you haven't seen people refer to this site as the farms are you even really using this site? Also nowhere did I claim to be an "oldfag," you wouldn't catch me ever using those retarded terms, because again, I'm not a mental defective like you.

No. 1873636

>>1873632
nta but
>gets into drunk infights
>not a mental defective
come on now

No. 1873642

>>1873636
Girl YOU come on now don't you start with me too I'm not drunk enough to in-fight like this right now and the liquor stores are closed for the night. There is a difference between mentally unwell and mentally defective! I'm the former the other anon is the latter!

No. 1873649

>>1873577
>>1873590
hell is earth when you're a mormon woman, dying is actually a release from mormon scrotes.

No. 1873691

>>1873649
I haven’t talked to any missionaries from Utah/the Mormon belt/don’t live there so maybe that’s why I haven’t experienced this, they’ve all seemed like soft wholesome types. I’ve heard the culture in Utah itself can be pretty wild in a very not fun way. Those sodie shop chains are abominations, any geographic locale that can support multiple different chains of places putting half n half into Mountain Dew mixed with Red Bull and marshmallow peeps on top is filled with a type of mental jillness I’d like to keep my distance from.

No. 1873695

>>1873691
yeah being mormon cultist is fine but mixing soda is the abomination here.

No. 1873701

>>1873691
I have only ever driven through Utah, but just in driving through SLC you see so much Mormon cognitive dissonance. Literally 50% of the billboards are advertising for divorce lawyers. The other 50% are advertising a church. For one thing, I have never in my life seen a church that needs advertising. But the two of those together was very chuckle-worthy. Mormon logic is something else kek

No. 1873705

>>1873691
>Mountain Dew mixed with Red Bull
What's funny is Mormons can't even drink soda or anything with caffeine it in without risking going to Outer Darkness™.

No. 1873732

>>1873632
>the farms
you're still doing it kek but I don't blame you because even cerbmin did it when they were fresh. just more proof newfag culture took over

No. 1873741

File: 1706778610021.png (394.71 KB, 1174x773, idc enough to edit it.png)

>>1873732
Yeah I said "farms" again because it doesn't really matter. You're coming off super autistic by being this obsessed with other anon's choice of "farm" or "farms." You can go through any old thread and cmd+f (or ctrl+f if you're poor) and search for "farms" and you can see a million examples of honest & true nonnies not giving a single flying fuck about calling lolcow the "farms." I've gone ahead and done it and screenshotted 3 examples of anons saying "farms" in reference to lolcow I found in <2 minutes, the oldest comment being from 4+ years ago. Even though you're a mental defective though I still respect you for not denying my accusations and if you want we can still kiss to settle our arguement like me and the other nonnie did earlier itt.

No. 1873750

>>1873732
stfu no1curr

No. 1873768

>>1873741
kek I know who you are now

No. 1873773

>>1873768
ooga booga me moid. me no sage. consequences will never be the same!!!

No. 1873780

File: 1706782091084.jpg (70.61 KB, 1079x1172, 1000002444.jpg)

>>1873732
Nta but I've seen anons say the farms for years wtfym

No. 1873802

>>1873780
newfags have taken over. historically "the farms" has always been KF, I don't know what else to tell you, sorry. IDK why that anon got so aggro over it too. It's just facts and getting so upset about realizing she's misusing a term is embarrassing. It's not that big a deal and my meme infographic was tongue in cheek to keep other anons from falling into the same trap

No. 1873806

>>1873802
Lmao. It’s not a “trap”. You’re just retarded & can’t accept that words change meaning over time.

No. 1873809

>>1873802
I think "the farms" did come from Kiwifags flooding this site and farmers adapting it because we are also a farm, but I've been here since 2015 and we used to just call ourselves lolcow, or lc(f), "the farms" didn't get used until the big kiwi flooding a few years back.

No. 1873810

>>1873802
This anon is a perfect example of what this anon was talking about when they said:
>>1872731
>"When they realize they're full of shit they start moving the goalpost and doing ridiculous damage control just to avoid admitting to being wrong."

No. 1873812

>>1873773
>saging on ot

No. 1873813

>>1873802
Theyve used farms interchangeably for at least four years. Please contain your miserable autism and accept the fact that words do evolve in meaning and can be used casually and even jokingly or ironically. You are not going to die because people say the farms. You flipping out makes me want to start saying it off principle alone and im an elderfag.

No. 1873817

>>1873813
>I'd rather align myself with KF and conflate our site with a scrote forum than admit I never noticed the difference

No. 1873821

>>1873817
Except I live in objective reality, im not aligning myself with anything by saying "the farms" on fucking /ot/ if I want, just like I can also occasionally ironically say mog or []maxxing as a joke without aligning myself with 4ch. Some of you are so beyond ill. You actually kind of sound like a kiwifag angry that your territory has supposedly been encroached kek.

No. 1873825

File: 1706785049410.jpg (31.66 KB, 395x296, thank u nonnies i wuv u <3.jpg)

>>1873750
>>1873773
>>1873780
>>1873806
>>1873813
>>1873821
Thank you to all the beautiful-souled lovely nonnies that defended me from that retarded walrus-like creature.

No. 1873831

>>1873812
Yes, dumbshit. When you make an off-topic post, like you are doing, you sage. All you have done is derail the thread with your retard take. I thought this was supposed to be hellweek, but I have a sneaking suspicion that muh farmz anon is a janny with no self awareness.

No. 1873861

>>1873705
So it's not ok to drink coffee but at least it's ok to use LC?

No. 1873938

>>1873705
That used to be the case but I believe it was clarified in like 2013 that specifically only coffee and tea (from the regular tea plant - so white/black/green/oolong teas etc) are no goes. Caffeine wasn’t allowed before then. So now, no cold brews and no fraps or lattes but super sugary energy drinks and soda mixed with even more sugar syrups? Totally fine! Also Yerba maté is fine too which when it’s roasted before brewing is basically like super caffeinated black tea. They believe in continuing revelations and have a current prophet and all that.
>>1873861
KEK I don’t see why it wouldn’t be allowed?! There’s even a subReddit for lds people they are allowed online, even on sites where there is technically porn available, they just aren’t allowed to watch/view the porn. I already don’t watch/view porn.

No. 1874043

>>1873831
someone infought with me over the single time I wrote "farms" when I had a legit question in meta. I only wrote it because I'd seen it here a few times, including cerbmin posting it. Interesting theory kek.

I guess I like the idea of the different boards of lc being different pastures, like a farm complex. But I didn't ever write "farms" again after I was gaslit (yes) about it.

No. 1876106

>>1873559
KEK, jannie is a fridgechan confirmed

No. 1878955

you know, sometimes its just better to shut up and say nothing.

No. 1878979

I still think about the anon from the grooming thread that responded to my experience with her own, but instead of commiserating told me I should take more responsibility and dogged on me. For being groomed at 16 by a 31 year old 4chan scrote
I hope she's doing ok

No. 1879266

>>1878979
That thread became such a dumpster fire in the later half, this is why I can't gel with the "uwu I love my nonnies" view because too many times I see anons victim blaming women who were abused, raped, assaulted, groomed, etc. Some anons are okay but many are heartless.

No. 1880529

File: 1707307979750.jpg (272.8 KB, 855x823, 1000015707.jpg)

Seeing an anon in the fandom discussion thread get dogpiled by anons with 0 reading comprehension on an opinion i agree on

No. 1880549

>>1880529
come defend me, loser

No. 1881318

The best feeling is when you see someone reply to your post and their response contains such levels of retardation that you can stop yourself from responding to them, but then as you hit the post button and the page refreshes you realize that they've deleted their response because the read the idiocy of their words aloud. It feels like such a victory.

No. 1882346

I'm still peeved about the time I criticized a certain celeb on /g/ and got jumped on by so many retarded stans even though on every other board everyone knows he's trash. I never thought I'd say this, but I'm glad celebricow anons had my back. They're the best at calling out his shit.

No. 1883287

really hoping the dipshit replying on my post where i wasn't confident with how famous some insignificant moid was in 2012 was baiting. i can't imagine someone believing an anon is underage for not knowing about the level of fame some nobody musician was 14 years ago. do you think everyone on lolcow is american? how is someone underage for not remembering something like that… i just know i'm older than you, hope you have an awful day

No. 1886814

I always get called a man on here and a troll on 4chan for my posts and they aren't even crazy. Mundane blogposting. The tone policing is everywhere online now

No. 1886818

>>1882346
Who was it? Harry Styles? Drake?

No. 1886841

>>1886814
If this is a consistent issue for you, it may be the ‘tism I fear

No. 1889148

>>1889132
>but homophobe-chans will eat you alive for this and think you're implying they're all dirty dykes for reading BL.
Nta but this doesn't make sense, a lot of fujos identify as lesbian or bi(dont drag infights from other threads)

No. 1891178

I saw a post with an insult I hadn't heard before then that I thought was very apt so I used it in a different post and then that absolute weirdo got so butthurt over my use of her insult that she made a whole response to my post questioning why I'd "copy" her and then made another post malding about how her insult was totally trademarked or whatever because she was using it against a certain person even though it was a very general type of insult. The whole thing made me kek really hard I won't lie. I feel bad for people that think they have some kind of holy copyright over words.

No. 1891180

File: 1708148597182.png (781.59 KB, 1120x838, bog miasmo.png)

>>1891178
KEK narcs be getting offended(selfpostception pt.2 electric boogaloo)

No. 1891187

>>1891178
You are such a fucking baby. I'm not a narc and I'm not offended, I called you out because it's a bizarre thing to do and it's regularly done by schizos who camp the gioyc thread. It was an oddly specific one liner, now you're whining and brought it here in hopes someone will validate you.(infighting)

No. 1891260

>>1891187
Nta, but what does bog miasmo mean?

No. 1891264

>>1891260
NTAYRT. Miasma is like a funky odour. In olden times they thought sickness came from foul odours so "miasma" was the term they used to mean a group of bad germs or particulates that infect the air. In the first post that used the term. The retard that self-posted these two replies (the ones screencapped in >>1891180) got the word wrong and called it "miasmo" for some obtuse reason. They also seem to have self-posted it in the funny screencaps thread.

No. 1891267

>>1891264
I actually was only the first reply

No. 1891272

>>1891264
nta but that's not what selfposting is

No. 1900839

File: 1708842375163.png (66.24 KB, 3582x389, ddd.PNG)

getting accused of being nlog on this website is like getting a dog to howl at a siren (btw I am not a coward but the thread was full)

No. 1900842

>>1900839
And she was right kek

No. 1900844

>>1900839
So this thread is for talking about the feelings you may have after an in-fight, to reflect on the cringe you posted in the throws of the in-fight, to recognize the need to infight is inherently stupid. This thread isn't for what you posted. Your post is just a sad attempt to drag an attempted infight into a different thread because you want to feel vindicated for your retardation. You don't sound like a coward, you sound like a petulant weirdo who's obsessed with women's workout clothing and is so far-gone in her obsession with being right that she decided to screenshot a comment that disagreed with you to post here as if it was some kind of victory for yourself.

No. 1900846

>>1900844
if there's a more appropriate thread I'll post it there, I'm just sort of sick of it, like the word doesn't mean anything anymore really.

No. 1900848

>>1900846
You don't have to post other anons pwning you. You can just realize what they're saying is true and move on with your day.
>NLOG doesn't mean anything anymore really
Nope, it still means exactly what you think it means. You were behaving like an NLOG by critiquing normal mainstream athletic fashion and acting like you were better than the woman that chose to wear it. It'd be different if you had complained about how fashion companies pump out low-quality clothes for women, or how most fashion companies are led by scrotes that may influence the look of their clothing and how that can affect women, but instead you chose to outright attack a normal chick for wearing something 90% of women that workout wear. You wanted to be seen as correct in your opinion, which was: women shouldn't wear tight-fitting clothes because it makes us look "slutty," so much so that you decided to drag this topic onto a different thread to try and see if other anons would give you more asspats. The term NLOG is still apt for describing this type of behaviour.

No. 1900897

>>1900848
I’m nta but I am the original poster of that unpopular opinion, and women are not forced to buy and wear those gross moid gaze clothes goddam. Fleshtone asscrack tights are NOT the only workout clothes available. Being unable to critique women at all is such libfem behavior.

No. 1901001

>>1900897
You’re pitching a fit over athletic gear and pulling the scrotoid logic of acting like because something is revealing or tight fitting it must be to serve scrotes and the women wearing it are disgusting because …. You can see the outline of their ass? Sorry nonna lets all wear wide fit jeans and a hoodie three sizes too big so you’re not offended over having to see the vague details of a womans body. it’s not libfem reasoning to call you out for sounding like an actual incel poster and over sexualizing compression gear because it’s not modest enough for you kekw.

No. 1901023

>>1900897
I love knowing that every time I'm in the gym as a young woman, in my cute clothes in my amazing body I bust my ass for, its making women and men like you mald and seethe. Before this I didn't think anyone gave a shit what I wore to the gym except me and never thought about it but now I'll be celebrating it. If you actually went to the gym you'd know the vast majority of people don't even look your direction because they're hard focusing on their workout, try it sometime

No. 1901045

>>1901001
>because something is revealing or tight fitting it must be to serve scrotes
Different anon but literally what other purpose is there to make the clothes like that? Why aren't men's clothes designed the same way?

No. 1901046

File: 1708869117943.jpg (322.15 KB, 1080x1171, lulu.jpg)

I think I get what they mean. Women's athletic wear is owned and made by men, it's tight, humiliating and uncomfortable. I wish women would only wear clothes made and owned by women.

No. 1901051

>>1901046
I've always been mystified at how leggings and yoga pants get shilled as "comfortable" all the time when loose shorts and jogging pants exist + are more practical, easier to move in and won't cause as much sweating.

No. 1901063

>>1901046
Do you have any preferred brands? Yeah I can google but as you all know, it's extra work researching this shit & if you know some already, I can spend that time on my dissertation instead

No. 1901073

>>1901045
You have never worn compression gear for actual athletic reasons and it shows. Are you all so retarded that you cannot even conceptualize reasons why tight fitting clothing might just be the better option for working out especially when some of us aren’t just doing treadmill cardio holy shit. I guess the women who go to my womens only gym are there in hopes a fucking scrote will stop by. Touch grass fucks sake.(infighting)

No. 1901077

File: 1708873249020.jpg (172.13 KB, 1500x1500, 71H3GFDkhgL.jpg)

>>1901073
calm the fuck down this isn't the infight thread. it's the post-infight thread.

No. 1901095

>>1901051
That’s what I wear, loose fitting shorts, loose fitting light material pants, and black thicker material leggings that don’t purposefully conform to my asscrack and cameltoe. Things that apparently doesn’t exist according to some anons. People will also say they must wear the shortest tops and shorts possible in hot areas in the States because it’s sooo hot, like no, loose fitting baggy clothes are so much better for that, providing shade and wicking sweat away.

No. 1904638

File: 1709086690430.gif (472.35 KB, 498x498, sneefle.gif)

Nonas how do you deal with an unresolved infight? I was really mean to someone earlier on a thread, all because I misunderstood something. I acted really out of character and like I got really upset because I thought they were trying to make me seem crazy but really they weren't trying to make me seem crazy at all and it was all in my head. I apologized twice but they didn't say it's okay or anything, even though they replied. Now I feel so guilty and ashamed of my behaviour and I wish I could make it up to them but I don't know how to do it. Does anyone else struggle with being mean to other well-meaning anons by accident because sometimes we all make mistakes and if so how do you deal with it?

No. 1905590

>>1904638
I’ve experienced this as well, but at the end of the day, we’re all on an anonymous ib known for being aggro so nonnies need to be able to just move on after an infight

No. 1905597

>>1904638
Don't worry, Nonna, I literally forget about what I post after a day.

No. 1905600

>>1904638
i forgive you, warrior of light

No. 1905622

>>1904638
I often argue with people here then completely forget what I even said, maybe they're like that and don't mind at all

No. 1905650

>>1905622
nta but I personally remember all my fights. i still hold some old grudges tbh.

No. 1905691

>>1904638
Even if she doesn’t remember the fight later, you might. So maybe think about this feeling next time you feel like firing off. Sometimes I feel better when I step away and cool off, then respond later (or not at all)

No. 1906790

>>1904638
Kek I only remember a fight if the other poster is especially retarded. I don't even get mad, I think it's funny. Chances are the nonna in question either didn't read your crazy reply or the apologies, or she thought it was funny and moved on. You can stop overthinking now, we're all retards here, you're not alone kek.

No. 1911995

File: 1709611622006.jpg (128.24 KB, 1400x902, MV5BNTU-z.jpg)

is the anon who's deadly serious about the moral standards of bad horror movies still with us i wonder. why was she so angry? why did she feel she had to infight about it over the course of multiple days? there's no way some baiter incited a bunch of farmers into shitflinging about homosexual propaganda and the feminist merits of retarded b-movies or whatever the hell she was on about, right? had to have been one of the weirdest anon responses to a shitpost, i still think about her every now and again.

No. 1911996

>>1911995
Wait is this Mandy lane? I've been thinking about rewatching

No. 1911999

>>1911996
YES IT IS, great taste anon. if you do you should come post about it in mundane shit or something, mandy singlehandedly got me through high school.

No. 1912002

>>1911999
I kept forgetting I planned on rewatching and by the time I'd get home to do so I couldn't remember what I wanted to watch every time so thanks for this. I actually have gotten fuzzy about a lot of the details so it will be kind of like rewatching. I was trying to remember what b horror movie I've watched that had a sexy sweaty shirtless guy in a cowboy hat and was narrowed down to this and a few others kek

No. 1912030

>>1912010
WOLFS CREEK! Definitely not, that movie scared me so much too. I just vividly remember a Mandy Lane adjacent one where they're out on farmland and it's a glistening toned hot dude in straight leg jeans. We've probably seen all the same movies, I can't remember the names of most of them because I've seen too many. Do you remember the one where an English girl working at an airport is lured by her female coworker to their family home where she's held captive by her sadistic family? That one scared me almost as much as Wolf's Creek but I can't recall the title

No. 1912048

>>1912030
sorry i got shy about derailing and deleted but it sounds like we have similar taste which is cool. you might be looking for the movie mum & dad? been meaning to watch that one for a long time and never got around to it, to be honest. horror with batshit female leads that aren't revenge films are so underrated. have you seen the semi-recent netflix movie We Summon the Darkness? kind of cheesy but the girls are hilarious. trying to think of your naked cowboy movie but coming up blank…

No. 1912056

>>1912048
It's fine I'll find it eventually maybe. And yes mum&dad!! It was so low-budg and silly to be so afraid of it but in my defense it was 2008 and the father was repugnant. Yeah I remember watching that, I like cheesy horror like that too because at the very least the premise keeps you paying attention.

No. 1912058

>>1912056
that's okay, the old man from poltergeist 2 absolutely terrified me as a kid even though in hindsight the movies weren't that scary. if you're looking for more out there stuff give session 9, identity (2003), and slaughter (2009) a go. hope you have fun rewatching mandy lane ♥

No. 1912208

>>1911999
>>1911996
nooo, if you (re)watch it, come to the movie thread on /m/. we actually have movie discussions there sometimes

No. 1913951

An anon kept accusing me and another anon of samefagging over something stupid. I saw later that they ended up getting banned for samefagging and it made me kek.

No. 1914062

>>1913951
kek thread?

No. 1914066


No. 1915350

Americans who defend the system treating them like slaves will never not amuse me. The government could literally start shooting poor people and other people will tell them they're just not trying hard enough.(dont drag infights from other threads)

No. 1915447

>>1915350
this is the post infight thread

No. 1915673

File: 1709878237646.png (243.89 KB, 569x572, us.png)

There's been so much discussion of bi cyclying in the /g/ bisexual thread recently I'm convinced it's either some kind of troll attempt or the people posting it are either virgins or have no experience of one sex.

No. 1915724

>>1915673
I've never believed in bi cycling like I just like both sexes that's it really

No. 1915822

>>1915673
Bi-cycling isn't real kek.

No. 1915833

I just partook in the most retarded infight of my life about geese and animated children's TV shows. At times, this website feels unreal.

No. 1915852

>>1901045
>For compression
>For seeing muscle contraction for correcting form during exercises
>It's light weight for wearing under heavier layers of clothes In colder weather
>It's flattering for the figure if you have a large chest and wear a loose shirt rather than something more skin tight it can look very frumpy and unflattering
>It's good for temperature-sensitive skin, and skin sensitive to temperature changes. I have circulatory problems and exposing my legs always exacerbates this.
>They're comfortable to sleep in and as lounge wear
>They're lightweight and warm like stockings
>Like wearing stockings you don't have to shave/worry about retards losing their mind from the sight of leg hair.

Lululemon or whatever the fuck that overpriced dogshit is called is a waste of money but a cheap pair of 9 dollar leggings is both useful and comfortable. I won't stop wearing comfortable and flattering clothes because of moids.

No. 1915889

>>1915673
I wish it was fake… it seems like it's more related to commitment/attachment issues than bisexuality though. would explain why only some bisexuals relate

No. 1915907

>>1915822
It isn't. People just wanna justify being lascivious.

No. 1915945

>>1915822
Bi-sexuality isn't real

No. 1915967

>>1915945
Kys tradthot and or moid.(infighting)

No. 1915981

>>1915852
They're not comfortable at all, idg where this meme comes from

No. 1915987

>>1915967
You dont exist you're nothing sis

No. 1915992

>>1915673
>>1915724
>>1915822
>>1915907
i'm not the one who posts about it but why doesn't it sound real to you anons? isn't it just finding one sex attractive for a while, then switching to another and then it repeats? that doesn't sound unbelievable

No. 1915998

>>1915987
The state of LC moid serving handmaiden pickme tradthots. I wouldn't call myself bi but genuinely kill yourself.

No. 1916007

>>1915992
It happens to many bisexuals. I don't get people who deny this, are they bi in denial or are they so autistic that they simple don't understand that other people have different feelings than them?

No. 1916025

>>1915998
You're fucking retarded both posts were obviously satire.

No. 1916028

>>1916025
NTA but how do you know that? Such retarded opinions do exist.

No. 1916047

>>1916028
You thought I was being serious with "you're nothing sis"? Are you all this autistic suddenly

No. 1916060

>>1916025
Satire that reads perfectly dead pan. Yeah, sure. What exactly is the satire of being homophobic against women? This site has had an invasion of actual tradthots, moids and male defenders, so you can fuck off with this sad shitty excuse.

No. 1916318

>>1915673
I love how using the correct thread to vent about a very painful experience in my life makes you want to picrel me. Thanks. Other than being a fucking pedophile it seems like having a sexuality like mine is the only thing that gets you instantly despised by the rest of the LGB. I don’t understand why you have to be so cruel about it. I’m already suffering enough on a daily basis and now I can’t ever post about it anonymously on the correct thread without people talking about how much they hate me or what a liar I am. Like to give you some perspective here that I’m sure you don’t give a single fuck about, I already want to kill myself on a daily basis because of my sexuality, and then I come here and see that multiple people are vagueposting about how much they hate me for using the only outlet I have (I tried professional help, I was compared to a TIM by my therapist for no fucking reason). You would think I’m a fucking puppy killer or something the way people react to me.
I’ll stop posting about it. I understand there is nowhere for me to go in this world. I have to either find a way to accept it or die.

No. 1916330

>>1916318
Nonna… please calm down

No. 1916389

>>1916318
Keep posting, nona. It's their problem if they don't like what you have to say. Don't let people silence you like that, especially in the appropriate thread.

No. 1916586

>>1916007
i assume its mostly self-hating straight women

No. 1916643

File: 1709929125113.jpg (37.13 KB, 567x567, 1054547.jpg)

>>1916318
I'm not even interested in this topic but I'm rooting for you anyway because I hate it when anons drag harmless posts to other threads (like the time an anon posted someone's suicidal vent in the funny caps thread)

No. 1916693

>>1916389
I appreciate it anon. I’ll probably stop talking about it for a while though since they’re right, it gets brought up too much there lately (but for the record, I’m not the only one posting about it)
>>1916643
ayrt… thanks nona. I like your cute cat pic.
I must give off a bully-able aura because that was me too(the post that got capped), FML

No. 1917413

File: 1709980544539.jpeg (160.29 KB, 936x425, IMG_6445.jpeg)

Oh the irony..

No. 1918638

I got into too many scuffles today and I definitely will be waking up to a ban.

No. 1918668

>>1916643
If it's the post I think it is, it was in unpopular opinions, not the vent thread.

No. 1919208

>>1918668
nope, it was in the vent thread
>>>/ot/1896914
>>>/ot/1897223

No. 1924277

File: 1710394929858.jpeg (41.8 KB, 459x500, 1710378756516.jpeg)

Fell for an anon's bait and I just know I'm gonna catch a ban for chewing them out, even though they were the one shitting up the thread.

No. 1924298

>>1924277
>chewing them out
So you'll be banned for infighting because you got into a slap fight and couldn't resist? If they were really shitting up the thread and not just disagreeing with you, you just report.

No. 1924329

>>1924298
I know nona but it was too late for me to delete what I wrote kek

No. 1927336

I’m being mocked in the YouTube shorts/tiktok hate thread for saying this is an abnormal amount of food to eat at once. They’re calling me an anachan? Am I going insane? This is a full on binge.

No. 1927339

>>1927336
I eat like half of this a week no anachan just ARFID (real diagnosis) but still. She definitely shoved her fingers down her throat after she stopped recording.(rattle rattle)

No. 1927342

>>1927336
>>1927339
You’re both psychos who have never truly allowed yourselves to go on a vacation holy shit

No. 1927344

>>1927342
Yeah I eat a little more than usual on vacation but nowhere near this much. It’s an excessive amount . I bet you think you have a “slow metabolism” or that you’re “big boned” lmao.(rattle rattle)

No. 1927346

>>1927339
No youre insane

>>1927336
She's on vacation. She doesn't even show herself eating it, just a couple bites and she likely shared the food. You crossposted this for no reason you still sound like a hateful immature bitch

No. 1927347

>>1927336
It would be if she actually ate it. You're too gullible.

Don't bring active discussions to this thread, this is the post-infight thread. We were not even fighting. I was literally contributing in the appropriate thread for hating tiktoks/shorts (in my case I hate how they're staged like this one is). Please. I just want to shoot the shit a little, not come back from work today with a ban for infighting. Don't take everything so personally.

No. 1927349

>>1927347
It's always some crazy bitch who is in the wrong that comes here and thinks people will agree with them.

No. 1927350

>>1927336
You're being weird, that's not a binge. The food portions are pretty small so a proper meal would easily take 3-5 items.

No. 1927352

>>1927344
Kek calm down, I’ve never been fat.

No. 1927353

>>1927352
We are watching a very unhappy little girl project her miserable neuroses onto the rest of us in real time.

No. 1927360

based mods anachans are insufferable

No. 1927477

>>1927336
I watch this creator pretty religiously because she always shows up on those often cancerous and unavoidable YT shorts. Her real profession is a singer and she usually performs with a crew on cruise ships, she also has a boyfriend/fiance (?) and also friends so she probably shares her food with other people and doesn’t want to yknow maybe broadcast every moment of her life into her edited videos that probably take days to upload, edit and filter through to make sure it’s monetization-friendly for the chink-tok algorithm so she can make a buck. She’s not a mongoloidette glued to her computer like you, anon.(racebait)

No. 1927667

>>1927347
Lmfao you immediately called me an anachan and now you’re claiming I’m ugly just because I rightfully called out some binge eating mukbanger with an annoying fucking voice so
>we weren’t even fighting!
Is false. You decided to start an infight with me. You had to take it sooo personally just because you gorge your pie hole day in and day out
>I’ve never been fat!!!
Burgers never think they’re fat, because being a fat cunt in your country is so normal that only people who drive around on their rascal scooters are called fat. Come to Europe or even better, Asia and see what they think of you there.
>>1927353
If you’d ever had to struggle in your fucking life, and I don’t just mean struggling to get off the couch, you’d be rightfully disgusted by mukbangers and the way they gluttonously stuff their faces and waste food. You assume just because I hate it that I must be an anachan? I’m a normal person who isn’t a greedy gluttonous cunt and knows what it’s like to not know when my next meal is coming. Pull your head out of your ass because the whole fucking world is not America and we don’t binge eat for fun in the rest of the world.(infighting)

No. 1927670

>>1927667
girl calm down lmao

No. 1927672

>>1927353
>a very unhappy little girl project her neurosis on to us
Every accusation is a confession. You get raging and upset every time someone suggests maybe stuffing and gorging your face and wasting food isn’t a good thing and you throw around the most personal insults possible. Ugly! Miserable! No that’s you. Anyone who binge eats and stuffs their face is riddled with shame, YOU hate yourself, you’re ugly and you have no self control and you should stop gorging your fat hole and go to therapy, you disgusting fucking pig.

No. 1927673

>>1927667
This just sounds like you're projecting some poverty trauma on some random woman as if she's the leading cause of food waste in the world

No. 1927676

>>1927673
The same fat bitches who were defending her Immediately turned on her and called her a fucking whore the second someone mentioned she has onlyfans. I was never even horrible to her, they just took it so personally just because they know that they’re disgusting wasteful gluttonous binge eaters themselves.

No. 1927677

Oh my god shut the fuck up. Shut up. Shut up shut up

No. 1927678

>>1927477
She has an onlyfans where she posts feederism content. Yes I’m sooo jealous of her. Jesus Christ. She probably has even more shame based mental health conditions than you, fat whore.

No. 1927680

>>1927677
Fuck off, I’m not going to be digpiled by a bunch of fat cunts when I did absolutely nothing wrong. You people say the most horrible things about other women day in and day out and I can’t say that someone’s overeating and has an annoying voice? Fuck off and KYS

No. 1927681

>>1927680
>>1927678
>>1927676
>>1927672
this is really funny to watch dont stop

No. 1927683

>>1927681
Kill yourself you stupid cunt. See? THAT is A logging not whatever I was doing before. Get it right next time you retarded zoomer cunt.

No. 1927685

Maybe overeating is spiritually evil and that woman is dead inside and rightfully being called out by this fearless nona.

No. 1927687

>>1927683
kekkk okay

No. 1927689

>>1927336
I see this person occasionally, I don't typically like this sort of content but I like her and will stick around to watch her vids. That being said, this isn't the thread for this. Don't continue your ongoing infights in this thread.
>>1927676
She doesn't have an only fans, where'd you get that?

No. 1927690

>>1927685
i think shes having some kind of mental breakdown, i feel bad for finding this funny now

No. 1927693

>>1927680
>>1927667
Very interesting, pray tell, is a 19.5 BMI fat in your eyes? Cause if so yes spot on I’m just a projecting, waddlin fat burger kek

No. 1927694

>>1927685
didn't she only take like 5 bites of food, i doubt she even actually eats all of that

No. 1927696

>>1927693
>knowing what your exact bmi is
>bragging about being underweight
What did I say? Every accusation is a confession. Stop sticking your fingers down your throat and go to therapy.(infighting)

No. 1927698

>>1927696
19.5 bmi is not underweight

No. 1927699

>>1927694
I kind of understand the hatred of seeing someone happily eating processed slop. It's like watching Wall-E.

No. 1927700

>>1927694
Even if she ate every last bite who fucking cares kek. Chances are decent she’s sharing but eating a lot of food on vacation isn’t a one way ticket life sentence to fatassery

No. 1927708

I'd kill for a big mac right now

No. 1927709

>>1927696
I had to google my bmi and vomiting scares the shit out of me

No. 1927711

>>1927708
damn that does sound really good

No. 1927718

>>1927672
So true bestie. Everyone who eats even 1 more calorie than what they're allowed in a day, should be sent to the showers.
I'm joking

No. 1927719

>>1927680
Shut up and stop being mean, I’ll be as fat as I want nonnie

No. 1927720

>>1927708
I’m thinking of getting like a dozen tacos from Taco Bell and a chalupa for lunch, that will help me become fat right? Like immediately?

No. 1927721

>>1927708
I really want fried sushi now. I love sushi battered in tempura.

No. 1927723

>>1927711
I've been craving that specific taste for ages
>>1927720
Yum a crunch wrap would be great right now too
>>1927721
I love aburi sushi but can't eat it which sucks. Is fried sushi just the stuff on top or do they fry the whole lot?

No. 1927724

>>1927680
Gonna go get obese so I can cosplay as you

No. 1927726

>>1927723
The batter the whole log in tempura and fry it up, it’s so amazing and it’s never soggy or steamy, it’s always crispy and goes well with the fish

No. 1927728


No. 1928091

>>1927672
Damn this freaky angry cow replies to my post twice. "She" had to come back to it because she was malding so hard.

No. 1934207

I know I'm being a sensitive bitch baby but sometimes when nonas give unnecessarily vitriolic replies for no reason it hurts kek. It's happened more than once like
>I like (completely innocuous thing), does anyone else?
>what the fuck is wrong with you? why would you post that? (thing) sucks so much. you shitty fucking retard
and I KNOW there are people who come here to let out their rage. i know people think it's fun to start infights for no reason. most of the time I can laugh it off and ignore him. but sometimes when I'm feeling particularly vulnerable it hurts way more than it should. maybe that's a sign I'm spending too much time here and need to learn to socialize without anonymity though

No. 1934443

>>1934207
Kek I do the same, it upsets me a lot sometimes. I always feel pathetic about it but sometimes I just come here to piss about and have a laugh and people take me seriously and are mean.

No. 1936202

File: 1711206805929.png (112.8 KB, 2718x382, atj98027.png)

kek made me laugh

No. 1936223

>>1934207
This happened to me recently and I swear it bothered me for the rest of the day, but not because I'm seething over imageboard banter but because it's so fucking rampant and ruins all interesting conversations on the site. Every time a genuinely fascinating topic set for a good discussion comes up someone has to shit it up with this kind of "why do you retards like this you're a fucking idiot please kill yourself" hostility for no reason other than to bait infighting for "entertainment".

No. 1936287

>>1936223
This is what annoys me about it too. You see anons confessing to infighting for "fun" all the time. Just feels like these are understimulated anons exploiting anonymity to live out their Regina George fantasies.

No. 1936375

>>1936202
Why would that make you laugh?

No. 1936787

>>1936223
If it helps at all, there is a very small group of men that purposely come here to try to ruin your day and tell you every mundane thing you like is bad and stupid. One of them is schizophrenic and brags about it in /meta/ occasionally too. They want you to feel bad.

No. 1937093

I wish nonas stopped replying to male baiters while knowing well it's bait. That's why they keep coming back.

No. 1937095

>>1937093
At this point I report the bait itself and then the newfags that respond to the bait too. I think a lot of people don't stop to think if something is bait before they respond, especially if they're feeling infight-happy.

No. 1937423

>>1936223
Yeah, I've just started matching their energy right back at them while responding normally in the same comment to nice nonas. It's funny because they then throw a little crybaby fit, asking why I'm so obsessed and telling me to kill myself. They're so fragile that they can't handle the littlest bit of banter.

No. 1937448

I was mad at the farmhands for being easily manipulated so I baited and then reported some random nonny for infighting and she got banned. Felt great ngl. I am not even sorry about the nonny who got banned, it was blatantly obvious bait.

No. 1937514

>>1937448
but i'm sure someone reported your bait as well

No. 1937562

>>1937514
I have no way of knowing, since I didn't get banned.

No. 1937714

>>1937448
Sometimes it feels like there might be an autopilot and to get someone banned you just have to report. I wish that were the case, because i hate injustice.

No. 1937719

>>1937714
doubt it, some bait I reported in the past still remained unbanned and the baiters kept going

No. 1939668

I was not involved in any of the infighting or posting because I haven’t seen the movie, but I’m so tired of the poor things fighting in the movie thread on /m/ that I can’t imagine ever watching the movie because I’d be thinking about the annoying back and forth about it and definitely wouldn’t be able to enjoy it.

No. 1939728

Everyone on here is so tightly wound the minimodding is getting stupid as fuck lately too. Like me and some anon getting out chops busted in the song lyrics thread

No. 1939877

>>1939668
I'm going through some shit irl and was vague about it to someone (I don't trust/know her well enough to tell her about this but it involves a few things including assault). Anyway, she is kind of a fake performative feminist and recommended that I watch Poor Things to cheer me up. "My friend thought it was misogynistic and male-gazey, but I thought it was empowering and amazing!"

All I could think about was the countless posts on lc about this weird as shit movie and I just thanked her for the suggestion. Don't think I need to see this movie anytime in my life, esp not now.

No. 1942450

I must confess, I’ve engaged in a few retarded infights because I’m pretty easily riled up. While I’ve gotten a couple of bans because I swear farmhands lacked reading comprehension and/or the ability to detect sarcasm, I’ve also gotten a few bans that were completely justified. Whenever I get a ban for infighting, it’s so embarrassing afterwards. I feel like a rabid animal foaming at the mouth and lunging at the livestock while farmhands beat me back with a stick

No. 1944138

osa male partnered women are fucking pathetic. i hate getting called a scrote for calling a woman pathetic for clinging to some pathetic male(ban evading)

No. 1946534

I have seen the light, never infighting again. It's just arguing in circles I wasted almost an hour when I could've done something more productive. Sorry mods, this moment of weakness won't happen again.

No. 1950791

I am sorry for once again taking the bait. I am here to repent for my sins. but god damn some of you are retarded



Delete Post [ ]
[Return] [Catalog]
[ Rules ] [ ot / g / m ] [ pt / snow / w ] [ meta ] [ Server Status ]